Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2021, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (7): 1278-1280.DOI: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20210703
Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:2021-05-20
Online:2021-07-14
Published:2021-07-11
CLC Number:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnykx.cn/EN/10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20210703
| 组别 | 株高/cm | 根长/cm | 根系体积/mL |
|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 22.5±1.5 a | 16.9±0.8 a | 1.51±0.16 a |
| T1 | 13.3±0.5 e | 9.8±0.3 e | 0.59±0.11 e |
| T2 | 15.1±0.7 d | 9.7±0.2 e | 0.58±0.15 e |
| T3 | 17.2±1.1 c | 10.1±0.9 d | 0.62±0.21 e |
| T4 | 17.1±0.9 c | 11.3±1.1 c | 0.79±0.22 d |
| T5 | 16.1±1.0 d | 10.8±0.8 c | 0.72±0.12 d |
| T6 | 18.2±1.2 b | 12.7±1.3 b | 0.97±0.22 c |
| T7 | 18.9±0.6 b | 13.8±0.3 b | 1.15±0.17 b |
| 组别 | 株高/cm | 根长/cm | 根系体积/mL |
|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 22.5±1.5 a | 16.9±0.8 a | 1.51±0.16 a |
| T1 | 13.3±0.5 e | 9.8±0.3 e | 0.59±0.11 e |
| T2 | 15.1±0.7 d | 9.7±0.2 e | 0.58±0.15 e |
| T3 | 17.2±1.1 c | 10.1±0.9 d | 0.62±0.21 e |
| T4 | 17.1±0.9 c | 11.3±1.1 c | 0.79±0.22 d |
| T5 | 16.1±1.0 d | 10.8±0.8 c | 0.72±0.12 d |
| T6 | 18.2±1.2 b | 12.7±1.3 b | 0.97±0.22 c |
| T7 | 18.9±0.6 b | 13.8±0.3 b | 1.15±0.17 b |
| 组别 | 叶绿素a含量/ (μmol·g-1) | 叶绿素b含量/ (μmol·g-1) | 总叶绿素含量/ (μmol·g-1) | 叶绿素 a/b |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 3.05±0.33 a | 1.44±0.21 a | 4.49±0.29 a | 2.12±0.09 d |
| T1 | 2.01±0.11 e | 0.66±0.05 e | 2.67±0.12 e | 3.05±0.13 a |
| T2 | 2.14±0.13 d | 0.78±0.11 d | 2.92±0.15 d | 2.74±0.15 b |
| T3 | 2.55±0.24 c | 1.08±0.17 b | 3.63±0.22 c | 2.36±0.22 c |
| T4 | 2.54±0.16 c | 1.11±0.18 b | 3.70±0.31 b | 2.28±0.31 c |
| T5 | 2.45±0.14 c | 0.82±0.12 d | 3.25±0.22 d | 2.99±0.13 a |
| T6 | 2.77±0.22 b | 0.99±0.32 c | 3.76±0.33 b | 2.80±0.23 b |
| T7 | 2.85±0.26 b | 1.18±0.19 c | 4.03±0.31 b | 2.41±0.32 b |
| 组别 | 叶绿素a含量/ (μmol·g-1) | 叶绿素b含量/ (μmol·g-1) | 总叶绿素含量/ (μmol·g-1) | 叶绿素 a/b |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 3.05±0.33 a | 1.44±0.21 a | 4.49±0.29 a | 2.12±0.09 d |
| T1 | 2.01±0.11 e | 0.66±0.05 e | 2.67±0.12 e | 3.05±0.13 a |
| T2 | 2.14±0.13 d | 0.78±0.11 d | 2.92±0.15 d | 2.74±0.15 b |
| T3 | 2.55±0.24 c | 1.08±0.17 b | 3.63±0.22 c | 2.36±0.22 c |
| T4 | 2.54±0.16 c | 1.11±0.18 b | 3.70±0.31 b | 2.28±0.31 c |
| T5 | 2.45±0.14 c | 0.82±0.12 d | 3.25±0.22 d | 2.99±0.13 a |
| T6 | 2.77±0.22 b | 0.99±0.32 c | 3.76±0.33 b | 2.80±0.23 b |
| T7 | 2.85±0.26 b | 1.18±0.19 c | 4.03±0.31 b | 2.41±0.32 b |
| 组别 | MDA含量/(nmol·g-1) | SOD活性/(U·g-1) |
|---|---|---|
| CK | 12.7±1.3 e | 57.3±1.7 a |
| T1 | 19.9±4.2 a | 38.8±3.7 c |
| T2 | 18.4±3.2 a | 40.6±2.7 c |
| T3 | 16.6±3.4 c | 43.5±2.1 c |
| T4 | 16.2±1.1 c | 44.1±2.3 a |
| T5 | 17.8±2.3 b | 40.3±4.2 b |
| T6 | 16.1±2.7 c | 45.7±1.9 c |
| T7 | 14.3±2.1 d | 48.1±3.5 d |
| 组别 | MDA含量/(nmol·g-1) | SOD活性/(U·g-1) |
|---|---|---|
| CK | 12.7±1.3 e | 57.3±1.7 a |
| T1 | 19.9±4.2 a | 38.8±3.7 c |
| T2 | 18.4±3.2 a | 40.6±2.7 c |
| T3 | 16.6±3.4 c | 43.5±2.1 c |
| T4 | 16.2±1.1 c | 44.1±2.3 a |
| T5 | 17.8±2.3 b | 40.3±4.2 b |
| T6 | 16.1±2.7 c | 45.7±1.9 c |
| T7 | 14.3±2.1 d | 48.1±3.5 d |
| 组别 | 脯氨酸含量/(μg·g-1) |
|---|---|
| CK | 47.3±0.5 d |
| T1 | 62.2±2.5 a |
| T2 | 59.3±3.1 a |
| T3 | 56.9±4.2 a |
| T4 | 56.6±1.1 c |
| T5 | 57.4±2.3 b |
| T6 | 53.6±2.7 b |
| T7 | 53.5±2.1 a |
| 组别 | 脯氨酸含量/(μg·g-1) |
|---|---|
| CK | 47.3±0.5 d |
| T1 | 62.2±2.5 a |
| T2 | 59.3±3.1 a |
| T3 | 56.9±4.2 a |
| T4 | 56.6±1.1 c |
| T5 | 57.4±2.3 b |
| T6 | 53.6±2.7 b |
| T7 | 53.5±2.1 a |
| [1] | 方鑫, 严涵, 姚鹏程. 不同禾本科植物对锌锰复合胁迫的响应差异[J]. 农业与技术, 2018, 38(21):11-13, 19. |
| [2] | 严涵, 方鑫, 朱贤豪, 等. 锌、锰单一及复合胁迫对水稻幼苗生理生化特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2019, 60(2):237-240. |
| [3] | 刘文星. 外源硒缓解烟草镉毒害及基因型差异的机理研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2015. |
| [4] | 张恩智, 蹇川, 张笑, 等. 抗坏血酸和铁系还原剂修复铬污染土壤[J]. 化工环保, 2020, 46(6):619-624. |
| [5] | 郭天荣, 姚鹏程, 张子栋, 等. 铝毒和低磷胁迫下水稻幼苗抗氧化系统的响应[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2013, 27(6):653-657. |
| [6] | 吴振球, 吴岳轩. 铜、锌对水稻幼苗生长及超氧物歧化酶的影响[J]. 植物生理学报, 1990, 16(2):139-146. |
| [7] | 邵邻相, 黄伯钟, 丁淑静. 锌、锰、铁和铜离子对水稻幼苗生长及SOD活性的影响[J]. 种子, 2001, 20(6):16-17, 19. |
| [8] |
SIMS D A, GAMON J A. Relationships between leaf pigment content and spectral reflectance across a wide range of species, leaf structures and developmental stages[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2002, 81(2/3):337-354.
DOI URL |
| [9] |
DEMIRAL T, TÜRKAN I. Comparative lipid peroxidation, antioxidant defense systems and proline content in roots of two rice cultivars differing in salt tolerance[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2005, 53(3):247-257.
DOI URL |
| [10] | 张志良, 瞿伟菁. 植物生理学实验指导[M]. 3版. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2003. |
| [11] | 王镜岩, 朱圣庚, 徐长法. 生物化学[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2005. |
| [12] | GILL S S, TUTEJA N. Cadmium stress tolerance in crop plants[J]. Plant Signaling & Behavior, 2011, 6(2):215-222. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
