Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2023, Vol. 64 ›› Issue (11): 2753-2755.DOI: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20221259
Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:2022-12-09
Online:2023-11-11
Published:2023-11-22
CLC Number:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnykx.cn/EN/10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20221259
| 处理 | 供试药剂 | 制剂用量 |
|---|---|---|
| T1 | 30 亿PIB·mL-1甘蓝夜蛾核型多角体病毒SC | 750 mL·hm-2 |
| T2 | 25%乙基多杀菌素WG | 180 g·hm-2 |
| T3 | 5%溴虫氟苯双酰胺SC | 300 mL·hm-2 |
| T4 | 5%溴虫氟苯双酰胺SC | 600 mL·hm-2 |
| T5 | 2.4%甲维苏云金SC | 600 mL·hm-2 |
| T6 | 30 亿PIB·mL-1甘蓝夜蛾核型多角体病毒SC+25%乙基多杀菌素WG | 600 mL·hm-2+120 g·hm-2 |
| T7 | 5%溴虫氟苯双酰胺SC | 450 mL·hm-2 |
| T8 | 20%氯虫苯甲酰胺(对照药剂) | 225 mL·hm-2 |
| T9 | 25%乙基多杀菌素WG | 120 g·hm-2 |
| T10 | 10%虫螨腈SC | 750 mL·hm-2 |
| T11 | 30亿PIB·mL-1甘蓝夜蛾核型多角体病毒SC+5%溴虫氟苯双酰胺SC | 600 mL·hm-2+300 mL·hm-2 |
| T12 | 25%乙基多杀菌素WG | 240 g·hm-2 |
| CK | 清水 | 0 |
| 处理 | 供试药剂 | 制剂用量 |
|---|---|---|
| T1 | 30 亿PIB·mL-1甘蓝夜蛾核型多角体病毒SC | 750 mL·hm-2 |
| T2 | 25%乙基多杀菌素WG | 180 g·hm-2 |
| T3 | 5%溴虫氟苯双酰胺SC | 300 mL·hm-2 |
| T4 | 5%溴虫氟苯双酰胺SC | 600 mL·hm-2 |
| T5 | 2.4%甲维苏云金SC | 600 mL·hm-2 |
| T6 | 30 亿PIB·mL-1甘蓝夜蛾核型多角体病毒SC+25%乙基多杀菌素WG | 600 mL·hm-2+120 g·hm-2 |
| T7 | 5%溴虫氟苯双酰胺SC | 450 mL·hm-2 |
| T8 | 20%氯虫苯甲酰胺(对照药剂) | 225 mL·hm-2 |
| T9 | 25%乙基多杀菌素WG | 120 g·hm-2 |
| T10 | 10%虫螨腈SC | 750 mL·hm-2 |
| T11 | 30亿PIB·mL-1甘蓝夜蛾核型多角体病毒SC+5%溴虫氟苯双酰胺SC | 600 mL·hm-2+300 mL·hm-2 |
| T12 | 25%乙基多杀菌素WG | 240 g·hm-2 |
| CK | 清水 | 0 |
| 处理 | 药后3 d | 药后7 d | 药后15 d | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 虫口数 | 防治效果/% | 虫口数 | 防治效果/% | 虫口数 | 防治效果/% | |
| T1 | 14.00 | 63.95±2.68 d | 23.33 | 51.39±2.43 e | 20.00 | 46.90±3.89 e |
| T2 | 0.67 | 98.85±3.08 a | 1.33 | 97.22±3.93 a | 10.33 | 72.57±1.50 bcd |
| T3 | 3.67 | 90.56±0.86 c | 4.67 | 90.28±2.37 bc | 16.00 | 57.52±2.68 de |
| T4 | 2.33 | 94.02±1.00 bc | 5.00 | 89.58±2.08 c | 2.67 | 92.92±1.90 a |
| T5 | 2.00 | 95.05±2.00 abc | 4.00 | 91.67±1.26 bc | 15.67 | 58.41±5.61 cde |
| T6 | 1.67 | 95.79±1.30 abc | 1.67 | 96.53±1.16 ab | 8.00 | 78.76±2.16 b |
| T7 | 1.00 | 98.31±3.90 ab | 3.00 | 93.75±3.06 abc | 9.67 | 74.34±3.05 bc |
| T8 | 3.67 | 90.56±0.86 c | 12.00 | 75.00±4.14 d | 12.67 | 66.37±1.07 bcd |
| T9 | 1.67 | 95.99±2.30 abc | 2.00 | 95.83±1.79 abc | 13.33 | 64.60±3.81 bcd |
| T10 | 12.00 | 69.88±1.07 d | 26.00 | 45.83±0.69 e | 28.00 | 25.66±2.02 f |
| T11 | 1.67 | 95.99±2.31 abc | 2.67 | 94.44±1.67 abc | 9.00 | 76.11±1.03 b |
| T12 | 1.67 | 95.79±1.30 abc | 1.67 | 96.53±1.16 ab | 9.33 | 75.22±5.21 b |
| CK | 38.67 | 0 | 48.00 | 0 | 37.67 | 0 |
| 处理 | 药后3 d | 药后7 d | 药后15 d | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 虫口数 | 防治效果/% | 虫口数 | 防治效果/% | 虫口数 | 防治效果/% | |
| T1 | 14.00 | 63.95±2.68 d | 23.33 | 51.39±2.43 e | 20.00 | 46.90±3.89 e |
| T2 | 0.67 | 98.85±3.08 a | 1.33 | 97.22±3.93 a | 10.33 | 72.57±1.50 bcd |
| T3 | 3.67 | 90.56±0.86 c | 4.67 | 90.28±2.37 bc | 16.00 | 57.52±2.68 de |
| T4 | 2.33 | 94.02±1.00 bc | 5.00 | 89.58±2.08 c | 2.67 | 92.92±1.90 a |
| T5 | 2.00 | 95.05±2.00 abc | 4.00 | 91.67±1.26 bc | 15.67 | 58.41±5.61 cde |
| T6 | 1.67 | 95.79±1.30 abc | 1.67 | 96.53±1.16 ab | 8.00 | 78.76±2.16 b |
| T7 | 1.00 | 98.31±3.90 ab | 3.00 | 93.75±3.06 abc | 9.67 | 74.34±3.05 bc |
| T8 | 3.67 | 90.56±0.86 c | 12.00 | 75.00±4.14 d | 12.67 | 66.37±1.07 bcd |
| T9 | 1.67 | 95.99±2.30 abc | 2.00 | 95.83±1.79 abc | 13.33 | 64.60±3.81 bcd |
| T10 | 12.00 | 69.88±1.07 d | 26.00 | 45.83±0.69 e | 28.00 | 25.66±2.02 f |
| T11 | 1.67 | 95.99±2.31 abc | 2.67 | 94.44±1.67 abc | 9.00 | 76.11±1.03 b |
| T12 | 1.67 | 95.79±1.30 abc | 1.67 | 96.53±1.16 ab | 9.33 | 75.22±5.21 b |
| CK | 38.67 | 0 | 48.00 | 0 | 37.67 | 0 |
| 处理 | 药后3 d | 药后7 d | 药后15 d | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 为害株数 | 保苗效果/% | 为害株数 | 保苗效果/% | 为害株数 | 保苗效果/% | |
| T1 | 23.00 | 19.78±4.13 d | 23.00 | 21.50±3.87 d | 23.00 | 52.44±2.39 e |
| T2 | 9.00 | 68.61±3.39 ab | 2.33 | 92.04±1.17 a | 6.00 | 88.00±2.96 ab |
| T3 | 7.00 | 75.58±3.49 ab | 6.33 | 78.38±2.08 b | 13.67 | 71.79±1.57 d |
| T4 | 5.67 | 80.23±2.27 a | 4.33 | 90.90±3.29 a | 5.33 | 89.62±3.66 a |
| T5 | 8.67 | 69.77±2.59 ab | 4.33 | 85.21±1.91 ab | 8.67 | 82.28±2.29 abcd |
| T6 | 6.00 | 79.07±2.88 a | 2.00 | 93.17±0.00 a | 5.33 | 89.09±1.65 ab |
| T7 | 7.67 | 73.26±2.68 ab | 2.67 | 85.21±2.41 ab | 5.67 | 88.65±2.81 ab |
| T8 | 6.67 | 76.75±2.13 a | 10.33 | 64.73±3.77 c | 12.33 | 75.60±6.43 cd |
| T9 | 11.67 | 59.31±4.19 b | 3.00 | 89.76±1.89 a | 8.33 | 82.77±0.52 abcd |
| T10 | 17.67 | 38.38±3.69 c | 19.67 | 32.88±3.82 d | 27.67 | 42.68±2.82 e |
| T11 | 7.00 | 75.58±1.35 ab | 4.00 | 86.35±1.66 ab | 11.00 | 77.33±1.64 bcd |
| T12 | 5.00 | 82.56±2.56 a | 3.00 | 89.76±3.99 a | 6.67 | 86.31±1.55 abc |
| CK | 28.67 | 0 | 29.33 | 0 | 48.33 | 0 |
| 处理 | 药后3 d | 药后7 d | 药后15 d | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 为害株数 | 保苗效果/% | 为害株数 | 保苗效果/% | 为害株数 | 保苗效果/% | |
| T1 | 23.00 | 19.78±4.13 d | 23.00 | 21.50±3.87 d | 23.00 | 52.44±2.39 e |
| T2 | 9.00 | 68.61±3.39 ab | 2.33 | 92.04±1.17 a | 6.00 | 88.00±2.96 ab |
| T3 | 7.00 | 75.58±3.49 ab | 6.33 | 78.38±2.08 b | 13.67 | 71.79±1.57 d |
| T4 | 5.67 | 80.23±2.27 a | 4.33 | 90.90±3.29 a | 5.33 | 89.62±3.66 a |
| T5 | 8.67 | 69.77±2.59 ab | 4.33 | 85.21±1.91 ab | 8.67 | 82.28±2.29 abcd |
| T6 | 6.00 | 79.07±2.88 a | 2.00 | 93.17±0.00 a | 5.33 | 89.09±1.65 ab |
| T7 | 7.67 | 73.26±2.68 ab | 2.67 | 85.21±2.41 ab | 5.67 | 88.65±2.81 ab |
| T8 | 6.67 | 76.75±2.13 a | 10.33 | 64.73±3.77 c | 12.33 | 75.60±6.43 cd |
| T9 | 11.67 | 59.31±4.19 b | 3.00 | 89.76±1.89 a | 8.33 | 82.77±0.52 abcd |
| T10 | 17.67 | 38.38±3.69 c | 19.67 | 32.88±3.82 d | 27.67 | 42.68±2.82 e |
| T11 | 7.00 | 75.58±1.35 ab | 4.00 | 86.35±1.66 ab | 11.00 | 77.33±1.64 bcd |
| T12 | 5.00 | 82.56±2.56 a | 3.00 | 89.76±3.99 a | 6.67 | 86.31±1.55 abc |
| CK | 28.67 | 0 | 29.33 | 0 | 48.33 | 0 |
| [1] | 姜玉英, 刘杰, 谢茂昌, 等. 2019年我国草地贪夜蛾扩散为害规律观测[J]. 植物保护, 2019, 45(6):10-19. |
| [2] | 李定银, 郅军锐, 张涛, 等. 草地贪夜蛾对4种寄主植物的偏好性[J]. 植物保护, 2019, 45(6):50-54. |
| [3] | 何莉梅, 葛世帅, 陈玉超, 等. 草地贪夜蛾的发育起点温度、有效积温和发育历期预测模型[J]. 植物保护, 2019, 45(5):18-26. |
| [4] | 李永平, 张帅, 王晓军, 等. 草地贪夜蛾抗药性现状及化学防治策略[J]. 植物保护, 2019, 45(4):14-19. |
| [1] | JU Yawen, XU Peng, FU Yousheng, CAO Kaige. Research on the prevention and control of wheat scab by endophytic fungal fermentation broth [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(6): 1429-1433. |
| [2] | WU Shuinv, FANG Yihao. Field efficacy demonstration of 200 g·L-1 chlorantraniliprole and 150 g·L-1 indoxacarb against Spodoptera frugiperda on maize [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(6): 1441-1444. |
| [3] | SHEN Zujin, SHEN Yuejun, YAO Zhangliang, XU Weidong, LU Qiang. Screening test of pesticides for the prevention and control of rice bakanae disease [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(5): 1203-1207. |
| [4] | LI Jianzhong, SHEN Ying, LIANG Weifang, JIANG Jianfeng, XU Gangyong, WANG Xiaodong, CHEN Jianbing, YANG Yong. Application of normalized prevention and control technology of rice bacterial leaf blight [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(4): 957-961. |
| [5] | FANG Yunfeng, YAO Zhangliang. Two kinds of intelligent monitoring and evaluation system to rice leaf roller Cnaphalocrocis medinalis and rice stem borer Chilo suppressalis [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(3): 652-656. |
| [6] | FU Sheng, REN Jie, YANG Fengli. Effect of 9 herbicides on weed control effect and yield in single-cropping late rice direct seeding field [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(3): 657-660. |
| [7] | QI Yueyue, SHAO Yu, ZHANG Ping, HU Zonglin, NIU Jianguo, FENG Xingkai, HU Yongyang. Combined virulence of prothioconazole and fluazole hydroxylamine compounds against fusarium head blight [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(3): 667-671. |
| [8] | ZHANG Fuqiang, ZHANG Hongjie, ZHANG Guo, YU Julong, WANG Junwen, QI Junsheng. Comparison of the application effects of two kinds of immune inducers and conventional agents in wheat [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(3): 672-675. |
| [9] | Jihui WEN, Yi YAO, Yibo LI, Qisheng SONG, Zhi WANG. Application of sexual attractants in the detection and booby-trapping of rice leaf roller [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(2): 385-389. |
| [10] | ZHANG Fuxian, SHEN Shengfa, SHAO Xiaowei, WU Liehong. Experimental study on the occurrence of sweet potato weevil in the field [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(1): 139-143. |
| [11] | LI Zilin, YANG Ji, LIU Xiaohui, MA Yiwen, TANG Yuanxiang, LI Xuewei. Comparative study on the control effects of different agents on tobacco viral disease [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(1): 162-165. |
| [12] | WANG Xiaofei, ZHOU Changyong, LI Meixia, MAO Jia, CHEN Yali, QI Yingjie, QIAN Xin, CHEN Xianghua, ZHENG Lei, CAO Kaige. Field control effect of 22.4% fluazole aniline seed treatment suspension on rice diseases [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(1): 170-174. |
| [13] | . [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 64(12): 2920-2922. |
| [14] | . [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 64(12): 2923-2925. |
| [15] | . [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 64(12): 2939-2943. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
