Effect of adding chitosan oligosaccharide to the diet on the immune performance and antioxidant performance of Columba

doi:10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20220536

Abstract

Abstract:

The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of adding chitosan oligosaccharide to the diet on the production performance, immune organ index, slaughter performance, and immune performance of Columba. The results showed that adding different amounts of chitosan oligosaccharides to the diet could improve the production performance of Columba. Compared with the control group, the feed to weight ratios of the COSL group, COSM group, and COSH group were significantly (p<0.05) reduced. Adding chitosan oligosaccharide to the diet can improve the slaughter performance of Columba. Compared with the control group, the full clearance rates and semi clearance rates of Columba of the COSL group, COSM group, and COSH group were significantly increased. Compared with the control group, the COSM and COSH groups significantly increased the contents of total protein (TP), albumin (ALB), globulin (GLB), immunoglobulin A (IgA), immunoglobulin G (IgG), and immunoglobulin M (IgM) in the serum of Columba, while significantly reducing the content of tumor necrosis factor alpha(TNF-α). Compared with the COSM group, the COSH group showed a significant increase in ALB content and a significant decrease in TNF-α content. Compared with the control group and COSL group, the COSM group and COSH group showed significant increases in total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC), superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) activity, catalase (CAT) activity in serum, while malondialdehyde (MDA) content was significantly reduced. The SOD activity, GSH-Px activity, and CAT activity in the COSH group were significantly higher than those in the COSM group. Under the conditions of this experiment, the addition of 400 mg·kg^-1 chitosan oligosaccharide to the diet for Columba showed the best effect.

Key words: chitosan oligosaccharide, Columba, slaughter performance, immune performance, antioxidant performance

CLC Number:

S966.12

WANG Gongxu, SUN Hanxue, LI Guoqin, LU Lizhi, LI Haiying. Effect of adding chitosan oligosaccharide to the diet on the immune performance and antioxidant performance of Columba[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(12): 3057-3062.

Figures/Tables 5

References 22

[1]	孙晓珊, 王铮, 林冬梅, 等. 常见植物提取物在禽类养殖中的应用[J]. 今日畜牧兽医, 2021, 37(4):72-74.
[2]	李晓晶, 朴香淑, 袁书林, 等. 壳寡糖替代金霉素对肉仔鸡生长性能和免疫功能的影响[J]. 饲料与畜牧, 2007(1): 16-18.
[3]	徐小龙, 周鲁宁, 张斌, 等. 壳寡糖替代抗生素对肉仔鸡生长性能及免疫功能的影响[J]. 饲料广角, 2016(17):33-37.
[4]	徐晨希, 王志跃, 杨海明, 等. 壳寡糖和丁酸梭菌对肉仔鸡生长性能、血清生化指标及内脏器官相对重的影响[J]. 中国家禽, 2018, 40(18):26-30.
[5]	闫冰雪, 王焕杰, 陈小鸽, 等. 壳寡糖对肉仔鸡生长性能、屠宰性能、骨骼参数及钙磷代谢的影响[J]. 饲料工业, 2019, 40(3): 44-48.
[6]	白洁. 饲粮添加壳寡糖对肉鸡生产性能、免疫性能、抗氧化性能及肠道发育的影响[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2018.
[7]	孟晓. 壳寡糖对蛋鸡生产性能及免疫功能的影响[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2014.
[8]	张得才, 王志跃, 杨海明, 等. 蚕沙对14-70日龄仔鹅生长性能、体尺性状、屠宰性能和脏器指数的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2014, 26(12):3772-3780.
[9]	王月超, 蔡辉益, 闫海洁, 等. 爱拔益加肉公鸡骨骼肌生长发育规律及组织学特性[J]. 动物营养学报, 2014, 26(4):1085-1094.
[10]	吴红翔, 欧阳捡云, 刘三凤, 等. 木寡糖益生素和益生素对广东麻鸡屠宰性能及肌肉品质的影响[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2006, 28(6): 899-902.
[11]	王怀蓬, 乌日娜. 低聚木糖对AA肉仔鸡生产性能和屠宰性能的影响[J]. 粮食与饲料工业, 2008(7): 35-36.
[12]	史宇涛, 马志鹏, 张俊梅, 等. 壳寡糖对白羽肉鸡生长性能及血清生化指标和肠道形态的影响[J]. 武汉轻工大学学报, 2020, 39(3): 8-12.
[13]	蔡文娣, 初金鑫, 付辰炜, 等. 壳寡糖对正常小鼠免疫功能的影响[J]. 中国海洋药物, 2010, 29(4): 42-45.
[14]	黄曼曼. 不同剂型丁酸钠对蛋鸭生产性能及肠道健康的影响[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2021.
[15]	杨海英, 杨在宾, 杨维仁, 等. 益生素和低聚木糖对断奶仔猪生产性能、消化酶活性、血液指标和肠道微生物的影响[J]. 中国兽医学报, 2009(7): 914-919.
[16]	李晓丽, 董淑丽, 何万领, 等. 果寡糖对不同生长阶段固始鸡血液生化指标的影响[J]. 中国粮油学报, 2010, 25(4): 43-45, 55.
[17]	RÜTTING T, BRANDT H, CLAUΒ W, et al. Comparative study of predator avoidance behaviour of pheasants (Phasianus colchicus) of different genetic origin[J]. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 2007, 53(3): 171-177.
[18]	李阳, 常文环, 张姝, 等. 饲粮添加壳寡糖和干酪乳杆菌对肉鸡生长性能、肌肉品质及抗氧化性能的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2016, 28(5): 1450-1461.
[19]	黄凤华, 郑新民, 张元珍, 等. 诊断超声波照射对大鼠睾丸总抗氧化能力、丙二醛及脂质过氧化物酶水平和生殖细胞凋亡的影响[J]. 武汉大学学报(医学版), 2007, 28(1): 85-88.
[20]	寇庆, 梁咪娟, 陶亮亮. 酵母硒对肉鸡组织硒含量及抗氧化能力的影响[J]. 粮食与饲料工业, 2012(1): 48-50.
[21]	臧珉, 陈斌. 壳寡糖抑菌及抗氧化性的研究[J]. 中国野生植物资源, 2016, 35(6): 27-30.
[22]	孙雅煊, 刘婷, 戴雪伶, 等. 壳寡糖抗小鼠脑缺血/再灌注作用研究[J]. 中国药理学通报, 2010, 26(9):1180-1184.

组别	平均日增重/g	平均日采食量/g	料重比
对照组	1.63±0.05 a	45.16±0.99 a	27.71±0.69 a
COSL	1.83±0.11 a	43.76±0.99 a	23.91±0.86 b
COSM	1.67±0.15 a	44.65±1.03 a	26.74±0.87 b
COSH	1.79±0.12 a	42.18±1.07 a	23.56±0.97 b

组别	平均日增重/g	平均日采食量/g	料重比
对照组	1.63±0.05 a	45.16±0.99 a	27.71±0.69 a
COSL	1.83±0.11 a	43.76±0.99 a	23.91±0.86 b
COSM	1.67±0.15 a	44.65±1.03 a	26.74±0.87 b
COSH	1.79±0.12 a	42.18±1.07 a	23.56±0.97 b

组别	屠宰率	半净膛率	全净膛率	胸肌率	腿肌率
对照组	93.15±0.12 a	83.97±2.02 b	77.51±1.77 b	27.57±1.02 a	6.47±0.29 a
COSL	93.19±0.27 a	87.90±1.59 a	81.95±1.61 a	27.97±0.38 a	6.54±0.18 a
COSM	92.82±0.24 a	88.25±0.74 a	82.47±0.76 a	28.97±1.84 a	6.69±0.12 a
COSH	92.91±0.17 a	89.37±0.46 a	82.69±0.63 a	28.43±0.80 a	6.74±0.43 a

组别	屠宰率	半净膛率	全净膛率	胸肌率	腿肌率
对照组	93.15±0.12 a	83.97±2.02 b	77.51±1.77 b	27.57±1.02 a	6.47±0.29 a
COSL	93.19±0.27 a	87.90±1.59 a	81.95±1.61 a	27.97±0.38 a	6.54±0.18 a
COSM	92.82±0.24 a	88.25±0.74 a	82.47±0.76 a	28.97±1.84 a	6.69±0.12 a
COSH	92.91±0.17 a	89.37±0.46 a	82.69±0.63 a	28.43±0.80 a	6.74±0.43 a

组别	脾脏	法氏囊
对照组	1.83±0.19 a	0.50±0.06 a
COSL	1.65±0.22 a	0.60±0.05 a
COSM	1.40±0.22 a	0.63±0.09 a
COSH	1.86±0.16 a	0.66±0.04 a