Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2024, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (3): 574-582.DOI: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20230207
Previous Articles Next Articles
WEN Diandian(), WANG Ning, ZHANG Yuzhu, TONG Fang, DUAN Jinhui, WANG Yuanxiu*(
), YANG Lu*(
)
Received:
2023-03-03
Online:
2024-03-11
Published:
2024-04-08
CLC Number:
WEN Diandian, WANG Ning, ZHANG Yuzhu, TONG Fang, DUAN Jinhui, WANG Yuanxiu, YANG Lu. Effects of different fertilization schemes on the growth, development, and fruit quality of indoor planted tomatoes[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(3): 574-582.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnykx.cn/EN/10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20230207
施肥方案 | 施肥方式 | 施用量 |
---|---|---|
CK | 只浇水 | 适量清水 |
T1 | 只施营养液 | 2.296 mL·株-1 |
T2 | 只施磷肥 | 1.708 mL·株-1 |
T3 | 只施小颗粒肥料 | 5粒 |
T4 | 营养液+磷肥 | 营养液:2.296 mL·株-1;磷肥:1.708 mL·株-1 |
T5 | 营养液+小颗粒肥料 | 营养液:2.296 mL·株-1;小颗粒肥料:5粒 |
T6 | 磷肥+小颗粒肥料 | 磷肥:1.708 mL·株-1;小颗粒肥料:5粒 |
T7 | 营养液+磷肥+小颗粒肥料 | 营养液:2.296 mL·株-1;磷肥:1.708 mL·株-1;小颗粒肥料:5粒 |
Table 1 Different fertilization schemes for tomato
施肥方案 | 施肥方式 | 施用量 |
---|---|---|
CK | 只浇水 | 适量清水 |
T1 | 只施营养液 | 2.296 mL·株-1 |
T2 | 只施磷肥 | 1.708 mL·株-1 |
T3 | 只施小颗粒肥料 | 5粒 |
T4 | 营养液+磷肥 | 营养液:2.296 mL·株-1;磷肥:1.708 mL·株-1 |
T5 | 营养液+小颗粒肥料 | 营养液:2.296 mL·株-1;小颗粒肥料:5粒 |
T6 | 磷肥+小颗粒肥料 | 磷肥:1.708 mL·株-1;小颗粒肥料:5粒 |
T7 | 营养液+磷肥+小颗粒肥料 | 营养液:2.296 mL·株-1;磷肥:1.708 mL·株-1;小颗粒肥料:5粒 |
处理 | 第二侧枝长度/cm | 第二侧枝主叶长度/cm | 第二侧枝主叶宽度/cm | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
定植后40 d | 定植后80 d | 定植后40 d | 定植后80 d | 定植后40 d | 定植后80 d | |
CK | 3.48±0.48 c | 3.92±0.48 de | 2.05±0.27 c | 1.63±0.20 e | 1.08±0.19 d | 0.63±0.11 de |
T1 | 4.00±0.47 c | 3.53±0.89 e | 2.23±0.33 c | 1.72±0.35 e | 1.27±0.11 d | 0.64±0.20 de |
T2 | 3.37±0.82 c | 3.21±1.21 e | 2.07±0.38 c | 1.46±0.56 e | 1.35±0.42 cd | 0.58±0.29 e |
T3 | 4.88±0.29 b | 11.24±1.15 a | 3.45±0.43 ab | 5.58±0.38 a | 1.72±0.20 ab | 2.26±0.34 a |
T4 | 3.58±0.39 c | 5.21±0.50 d | 2.25±0.13 c | 2.64±0.14 d | 1.00±0.21 d | 0.95±0.09 d |
T5 | 5.38±0.33 ab | 9.78±1.48 b | 3.78±0.28 a | 5.32±0.66 ab | 1.63±0.09 bc | 1.74±0.38 bc |
T6 | 4.83±0.90 b | 9.37±1.19 b | 3.28±0.46 b | 4.84±0.50 b | 1.23±0.41 d | 1.81±0.27 b |
T7 | 6.12±0.61 a | 7.56±1.12 c | 3.77±0.24 a | 4.23±0.47 c | 2.00±0.15 a | 1.45±0.08 c |
Table 2 Growth indicators of the second lateral branch of tomato plants under different fertilization schemes
处理 | 第二侧枝长度/cm | 第二侧枝主叶长度/cm | 第二侧枝主叶宽度/cm | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
定植后40 d | 定植后80 d | 定植后40 d | 定植后80 d | 定植后40 d | 定植后80 d | |
CK | 3.48±0.48 c | 3.92±0.48 de | 2.05±0.27 c | 1.63±0.20 e | 1.08±0.19 d | 0.63±0.11 de |
T1 | 4.00±0.47 c | 3.53±0.89 e | 2.23±0.33 c | 1.72±0.35 e | 1.27±0.11 d | 0.64±0.20 de |
T2 | 3.37±0.82 c | 3.21±1.21 e | 2.07±0.38 c | 1.46±0.56 e | 1.35±0.42 cd | 0.58±0.29 e |
T3 | 4.88±0.29 b | 11.24±1.15 a | 3.45±0.43 ab | 5.58±0.38 a | 1.72±0.20 ab | 2.26±0.34 a |
T4 | 3.58±0.39 c | 5.21±0.50 d | 2.25±0.13 c | 2.64±0.14 d | 1.00±0.21 d | 0.95±0.09 d |
T5 | 5.38±0.33 ab | 9.78±1.48 b | 3.78±0.28 a | 5.32±0.66 ab | 1.63±0.09 bc | 1.74±0.38 bc |
T6 | 4.83±0.90 b | 9.37±1.19 b | 3.28±0.46 b | 4.84±0.50 b | 1.23±0.41 d | 1.81±0.27 b |
T7 | 6.12±0.61 a | 7.56±1.12 c | 3.77±0.24 a | 4.23±0.47 c | 2.00±0.15 a | 1.45±0.08 c |
处理 | 叶绿素a含量/(mg·g-1) | 叶绿素b含量/(mg·g-1) | 叶绿素总含量/(mg·g-1) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
定植后41 d | 定植后44 d | 定植后41 d | 定植后44 d | 定植后41 d | 定植后44 d | |
CK | 1.14±0.04 a | 1.00±0.10 ab | 0.42±0.05 c | 0.32±0.06 d | 1.56±0.09 c | 1.32±0.15 c |
T1 | 1.15±0.06 a | 0.93±0.12 b | 0.44±0.07 c | 0.31±0.04 d | 1.59±0.13 c | 1.24±0.16 c |
T2 | 1.07±0.10 ab | 0.98±0.21 ab | 0.38±0.10 c | 0.38±0.14 d | 1.45±0.20 c | 1.36±0.35 c |
T3 | 1.01±0.05 b | 1.01±0.03 ab | 1.75±0.20 a | 1.76±0.14 a | 2.76±0.15 a | 2.78±0.11 a |
T4 | 1.16±0.03 a | 1.21±0.01 a | 1.07±0.12 b | 0.85±0.07 c | 2.23±0.09 b | 2.06±0.07 b |
T5 | 1.00±0.02 b | 1.11±0.05 ab | 1.82±0.08 a | 1.33±0.25 b | 2.82±0.06 a | 2.44±0.20 ab |
T6 | 0.99±0.03 b | 1.11±0.06 ab | 1.82±0.12 a | 1.32±0.27 b | 2.82±0.09 a | 2.43±0.21 ab |
T7 | 0.99±0.02 b | 1.02±0.03 ab | 1.87±0.08 a | 1.72±0.12 a | 2.85±0.06 a | 2.74±0.10 a |
Table 3 Effects of different fertilization schemes on chlorophyll content of tomato seedlings
处理 | 叶绿素a含量/(mg·g-1) | 叶绿素b含量/(mg·g-1) | 叶绿素总含量/(mg·g-1) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
定植后41 d | 定植后44 d | 定植后41 d | 定植后44 d | 定植后41 d | 定植后44 d | |
CK | 1.14±0.04 a | 1.00±0.10 ab | 0.42±0.05 c | 0.32±0.06 d | 1.56±0.09 c | 1.32±0.15 c |
T1 | 1.15±0.06 a | 0.93±0.12 b | 0.44±0.07 c | 0.31±0.04 d | 1.59±0.13 c | 1.24±0.16 c |
T2 | 1.07±0.10 ab | 0.98±0.21 ab | 0.38±0.10 c | 0.38±0.14 d | 1.45±0.20 c | 1.36±0.35 c |
T3 | 1.01±0.05 b | 1.01±0.03 ab | 1.75±0.20 a | 1.76±0.14 a | 2.76±0.15 a | 2.78±0.11 a |
T4 | 1.16±0.03 a | 1.21±0.01 a | 1.07±0.12 b | 0.85±0.07 c | 2.23±0.09 b | 2.06±0.07 b |
T5 | 1.00±0.02 b | 1.11±0.05 ab | 1.82±0.08 a | 1.33±0.25 b | 2.82±0.06 a | 2.44±0.20 ab |
T6 | 0.99±0.03 b | 1.11±0.06 ab | 1.82±0.12 a | 1.32±0.27 b | 2.82±0.09 a | 2.43±0.21 ab |
T7 | 0.99±0.02 b | 1.02±0.03 ab | 1.87±0.08 a | 1.72±0.12 a | 2.85±0.06 a | 2.74±0.10 a |
施肥方案 | 横径/cm | 种子数量/个 |
---|---|---|
T3 | 17.93±1.86 b | 13.00±5.78 a |
T5 | 18.87±2.39 a | 17.60±8.84 a |
T6 | 17.46±1.82 b | 12.20±6.46 a |
T7 | 17.13±1.46 b | 16.19±10.33a |
Table 4 Effects of different fertilization schemes on the size of tomato fruits and number of seeds during the color breaking period
施肥方案 | 横径/cm | 种子数量/个 |
---|---|---|
T3 | 17.93±1.86 b | 13.00±5.78 a |
T5 | 18.87±2.39 a | 17.60±8.84 a |
T6 | 17.46±1.82 b | 12.20±6.46 a |
T7 | 17.13±1.46 b | 16.19±10.33a |
[1] | ROUSEFF R L, RUIZ PEREZ-CACHO P, JABALPURWALA F. Historical review of citrus flavor research during the past 100 years[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2009, 57(18):8115-8124. |
[2] | 杨新琴, 杜叶红, 林辉, 等. 浙江省番茄产业可持续发展对策的探讨[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2018, 59(10):1739-1742. |
[3] | 杨心彪, 李兴需, 刘睿, 等. 鲜食番茄成熟过程中果实营养成分的动态变化[J]. 华中农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 41(3):191-199. |
[4] | 金同铭. 番茄的营养价值与保健作用[J]. 蔬菜, 1998(3): 32. |
[5] | HASHIM M M, EL-BELTAGY A, JONES R. Chemical analysis and fruit quality in some new tomato lines growing under saline condition at the north coast of Egypt[J]. Egyptian Journal of Horticulture, 1990, 17: 113-121. |
[6] | TIEMAN D, ZHU G T, RESENDE M F R, et al. A chemical genetic roadmap to improved tomato flavor[J]. Science, 2017, 355(6323): 391-394. |
[7] | 刘迁杰, 贾凯, 陈健, 等. 不同施氮量对复合沙培番茄叶绿素含量及光合特性日变化的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2020(5):8-14. |
[8] | 韩洪润. 不同的基质配比对番茄幼苗生长的影响[J]. 青海农林科技, 2020(2):16-20. |
[9] | 程国亭, 娄茜棋, 栗现芳, 等. 番茄果实风味物质组成及其影响因素研究进展[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2022(7):23-33. |
[10] | 余玲欢, 樊怀福. 水分亏缺对番茄生长、产量和果实品质的影响[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2020, 33(11):39-42. |
[11] | 廉晓娟, 梁新书, 杨军, 等. 不同追肥水平对设施番茄产量、品质、养分吸收和土壤养分变化的影响[J]. 长江蔬菜, 2019(22):65-68. |
[12] | 徐盛生, 曲美玲. 沼肥对日光温室番茄生长的影响[J]. 中国果菜, 2022, 42(6):60-62, 79. |
[13] | 董洁, 邹志荣, 燕飞, 等. 不同施肥水平对大棚番茄产量和品质的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2009(12): 38-41. |
[14] | 李吉进, 邹国元, 宋东涛, 等. 有机肥和化肥对番茄产量和品质的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2009, 40(6):1330-1332. |
[15] | 王芳. 山东阳谷县日光温室番茄无公害高产栽培技术[J]. 农业工程技术, 2021, 41(34):60-62. |
[16] | 刘海英. 山东聊城日光温室番茄品种比较试验[J]. 农业工程技术, 2022, 42(10):72-73. |
[17] | 马秀丽. 温室番茄配方施肥技术[J]. 农业工程技术(温室园艺), 2007, 27(2):46-47. |
[18] | 穆俊祥, 曹兴明, 刘拴成. 氮、磷、钾缺素培养对番茄幼苗生长的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2015(6):40-42. |
[19] | 阿不都外力·卡力阿不都, 夏依买尔旦·艾白都力, 李烨, 等. 氮、磷、钾、钙营养胁迫对加工番茄幼苗光合色素及光合特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2013, 50(1):71-76. |
[20] | SCHMITZ-EIBERGER M, HAEFS R, NOGA G. Calcium deficiency-Influence on the antioxidative defense system in tomato plants[J]. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2002, 159(7):733-742. |
[21] | 肖家欣. 植物生理学实验[M]. 合肥: 安徽人民出版社, 2010. |
[22] | 马宏飞, 卢生有, 韩秋菊, 等. 紫外分光光度法测定五种果蔬中维生素C的含量[J]. 化学与生物工程, 2012, 29(8):92-94. |
[23] | 潘晖. 氮磷钾肥不同配比在加工番茄上的应用效果[J]. 农村科技, 2017(1):23-24. |
[24] | 郑新娟, 徐柏林. 氮磷钾肥对设施番茄产量与含糖量的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2019, 47(21):151-152, 169. |
[25] | 苗晋莉, 王智芳. 氮磷钾肥对设施番茄产量与含糖量的影响[J]. 河南农业, 2022(20):25-27. |
[26] | 袁亭亭, 宋小艺, 王忠宾, 等. 嫁接与施肥对番茄产量及氮、磷、钾吸收利用效率的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2011, 17(1): 131-136. |
[27] | 张钰, 郭世荣, 孙锦. 营养液浓度和用量对醋糟基质栽培番茄生长、产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2013(3):87-91. |
[28] | 任瑞珍, 武占会, 陈海丽, 等. 无基质营养液育苗的营养液浓度对黄瓜幼苗生长的影响[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2012(20):49-55. |
[29] | 林多, 黄丹枫, 杨延杰, 等. 营养液浓度对基质栽培网纹甜瓜生长和品质的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2007, 22(2):184-186. |
[30] | 王鹏勃, 李建明, 丁娟娟, 等. 水肥耦合对温室袋培番茄品质、产量及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(2):314-323. |
[31] | 潘可可, 刘恩玲, 朱剑桥, 等. 磷肥不同施用水平对设施番茄产量、品质的影响[J]. 上海农业科技, 2011(6):113-115. |
[1] | ZHANG Wenjun, ZHANG Qingfu, YANG Liu, SONG Jiajun, HE Jiguang, YANG Zaijun, XIONG Chengliang. Effects of different types of potassium fertilizer and application period on upper leaf quality of tobacco in Changsha [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(3): 549-554. |
[2] | WANG Pu, LI Baicheng, WANG Li, GUO Wenqi, HAN Xiaoyong, YIN Jianmei, JIN Lin, JIANG Lu, ZHANG Peitong. Study on the growth and development characteristics of taro in photovoltaic facilities in northern Jiangsu [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(3): 583-586. |
[3] | LIU Jianwei, FANG Hanhan, NI Xiaoming, YU Xuan, XU Jie, NI Jianping, QIAN Yi, WANG Lifang, ZHU Luomei. Effects of different tree shape of peach tree on fruit yield, quality and agricultural production cost in the mountainous areas of northern Zhejiang [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(3): 614-617. |
[4] | SUN Qinan, ZHANG Shuo, ZHU Weijing, CHEN Miaojin, GU Qing, ZHANG Xiaobin. Effects of different straw mulching patterns on the soil and fruit of peach orchards [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(3): 618-622. |
[5] | ZHENG Ting, WEI Lingzhu, QIAN Jichang, CHENG Jianhui, XIANG Jiang, WU Jiang. Fig quality and safety production technology [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(3): 627-632. |
[6] | ZHANG Fuqiang, ZHANG Hongjie, ZHANG Guo, YU Julong, WANG Junwen, QI Junsheng. Comparison of the application effects of two kinds of immune inducers and conventional agents in wheat [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(3): 672-675. |
[7] | ZHU Ming, ZHANG Yue, ZHANG Mingke. Effects of 5 microbial treatments on growth and fruit quality of Cucumis sativus L. [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(3): 680-684. |
[8] | HUANG Jingyi, ZHENG Kaidi, QIAO Jiajia, QIU Man, HAN Xiang, FENG Bo. Effects of rearing condition on the survival of Acisoma panorpoides nymphs [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(3): 641-646. |
[9] | Bo LI. Effect of exogenous substances on yield and quality of upper tobacco leaves [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(2): 301-306. |
[10] | Cheng YANG, Yongfeng AI, Bowen LU, Dajiang SONG, Fenghua PAN. Effect of structural optimization on yield and quality of tobacco upper leaf in Tongren [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(2): 307-313. |
[11] | Wenjun ZHANG, Chengliang XIONG, Qingfu ZHANG, Weiyuan YAO, Tao XIA, Song GUO, Liu YANG. Effect of fertilizer synergist on growth and development of flue-cured tobacco and yield and quality of upper tobacco leaves [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(2): 314-319. |
[12] | Zhe WANG, Yuhang WANG, Xiaoqing WANG, Huaifu FAN. Effect of LED light quality control on celery growth and yield in plant factory [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(2): 340-344. |
[13] | Ruchao FENG, Zhe LIU, Shaogui GUO, Lina ZHANG, Jie ZHANG, Feng SHEN, Jiaqiu ZHENG, Yi MEI. Study on the application effect of Ruikangdun microbial agent on autumn continuous cropping watermelon [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(2): 345-349. |
[14] | Hui YU, Lei CHEN, Ran DU, Hongmei YAO, Jinyan LUO. The occurrence, harm, interception and control measures of Tomato leaf curl New Delhi virus [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(2): 375-381. |
[15] | Songlian CAI, Shanfen WU. Formula optimization of potato oat whole grain nutritional noodles [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(2): 405-408. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||