Comparative experiment on greenhouse cultivation and wild cultivation of Ganoderma lucidum

doi:10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20231080

Abstract

Abstract:

Basswood Ganoderma lucidum and bag Ganoderma lucidum were used as materials to carry out greenhouse cultivation and understory imitation wild cultivation management. The effects of cultivation methods and materials on the growth cycle, fruiting body agronomic traits and nutrient content of Ganoderma lucidum were compared, and the effects of harvest time during the maturity period of Ganoderma lucidum on the nutrient composition of fruiting body and spore powder cultivated in greenhouses were discussed. The results showed that the understory imitation wild cultivated Ganoderma lucidum bud earlier, but the total growth cycle was longer than that of the greenhouse cultivation. Under the same cultivation mode, the agronomic traits of basswood Ganoderma lucidum were better than those of bag material. With the same cultivation materials, the contents of polysaccharides, triterpenoids and sterols in the understory imitation wild cultivated Ganoderma lucidum were higher. The content of polysaccharides in fruiting bodies harvested at the early stage was the highest, and then decreased slowly, while the content of triterpenes and sterols was the opposite. The spore powder collected in the early stage had the highest content of polysaccharides, triterpenoids and sterols. This experiment preliminarily provided a scientific basis for the optimization of cultivation materials, cultivation methods and harvesting time of Ganoderma lucidum.

Key words: Ganoderma lucidum, greenhouse cultivation, understory imitation wild cultivation, comparative analysis

CLC Number:

S567.3+1

FENG Qing. Comparative experiment on greenhouse cultivation and wild cultivation of Ganoderma lucidum[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(3): 627-632.

Figures/Tables 7

References 14

[1]	赵友兴, 吴兴亮, 黄圣卓. 中国药用菌物化学成分与生物活性研究进展[J]. 贵州科学, 2013, 31(1): 18-27.
[2]	ZHANG J S, TANG Q J, ZHOU C Y, et al. GLIS, a bioactive proteoglycan fraction from Ganoderma lucidum, displays anti-tumour activity by increasing both humoral and cellular immune response[J]. Life Sciences, 2010, 87(19/20/21/22): 628-637.
[3]	ZENG Q H, ZHOU F, LEI L, et al. Ganoderma lucidum polysaccharides protect fibroblasts against UVB-induced photoaging[J]. Molecular Medicine Reports, 2017, 15(1): 111-116.
[4]	TANG X Q, CAI W X, XU B J. Comparison of the chemical profiles and antioxidant and antidiabetic activities of extracts from two Ganoderma species (Agaricomycetes)[J]. International Journal of Medicinal Mushrooms, 2016, 18(7): 609-620.
[5]	王灿琴, 覃晓娟, 吴圣进, 等. 大棚与林下仿野生栽培灵芝比较试验[J]. 食用菌, 2015, 37(6): 40-41.
[6]	国家药典委员会. 中华人民共和国药典-一部: 2020年版[M]. 北京: 中国医药科技出版社, 2020: 1088.
[7]	邢茜, 安文杰, 张江萍, 等. 不同栽培方式灵芝营养成分和安全性的分析研究[J]. 山西林业科技, 2019, 48(4): 8-11.
[8]	李学龙, 李超, 李跃, 等. 不同栽培模式对灵芝菌株农艺性状及活性成分积累的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(9): 2045-2055.
[9]	李钦艳, 钟莹莹, 李忠, 等. 不同生长阶段灵芝子实体和孢子粉活性成分分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(1): 49-54.
[10]	刘义军, 卜梦婷, 刘洋洋, 等. 灵芝不同生长阶段营养品质变化规律研究[J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2020, 35(6): 1061-1066.
[11]	宝萍萍, 图力古尔, 包海鹰. 栽培灵芝不同生长阶段多糖和三萜类化合物的含量测定[J]. 菌物研究, 2011, 9(2): 110-113, 118.
[12]	姚松君. 灵芝三萜的超声波提取工艺及其指纹图谱检测方法的研究[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2010.
[13]	王金艳, 杨志空, 梁锐, 等. 灵芝孢子粉中三萜和甾醇分析测定方法的研究[C]// 第十二届药用真菌学术研讨会论文集. 福州, 2023: 113.
[14]	周春红, 董佳. 人工栽培灵芝与野生灵芝活性成分的比较分析[J]. 中国食物与营养, 2010, 16(12): 65-68.

栽培方式	栽培原料	覆土至现蕾所需时间/d	现蕾至开片所需时间/d	开片至成熟所需时间/d	生长周期/ d	日平均温度/ ℃	日平均相对湿度/%
大棚栽培	椴木	28	15	16	59	35.3	72.6
仿野生栽培	椴木	26	19	19	64	30.5	64.5
大棚栽培	袋料	27	13	15	55	35.2	72.4
仿野生栽培	袋料	23	15	19	57	30.4	65.0

栽培方式	栽培原料	覆土至现蕾所需时间/d	现蕾至开片所需时间/d	开片至成熟所需时间/d	生长周期/ d	日平均温度/ ℃	日平均相对湿度/%
大棚栽培	椴木	28	15	16	59	35.3	72.6
仿野生栽培	椴木	26	19	19	64	30.5	64.5
大棚栽培	袋料	27	13	15	55	35.2	72.4
仿野生栽培	袋料	23	15	19	57	30.4	65.0

栽培方式	栽培原料	单芝鲜重/g	伞盖宽径/cm	伞盖窄径/cm	伞盖厚度/mm	芝柄长度/cm	芝柄直径/mm
大棚栽培	椴木	160.03±70.71 A a	13.17±1.86 A a	6.43±0.82 B b	11.23±0.41 A a	7.93±0.89 A a	19.63±3.94 A a
仿野生栽培	椴木	85.03±35.01 A b	13.20±2.24 A a	10.01±2.92 A a	9.20±0.56 B b	6.83±0.86 A b	15.17±2.96 B b
大棚栽培	袋料	27.60±14.06 B c	8.19±1.66 B b	4.54±0.89 C c	11.68±0.92 A a	6.22±1.11 A c	10.42±2.48 C c
仿野生栽培	袋料	31.41±12.60 B c	8.63±1.81 B b	4.93±0.79 C c	9.54±0.67 B b	5.41±1.65 A c	11.15±1.82 C c

栽培方式	栽培原料	单芝鲜重/g	伞盖宽径/cm	伞盖窄径/cm	伞盖厚度/mm	芝柄长度/cm	芝柄直径/mm
大棚栽培	椴木	160.03±70.71 A a	13.17±1.86 A a	6.43±0.82 B b	11.23±0.41 A a	7.93±0.89 A a	19.63±3.94 A a
仿野生栽培	椴木	85.03±35.01 A b	13.20±2.24 A a	10.01±2.92 A a	9.20±0.56 B b	6.83±0.86 A b	15.17±2.96 B b
大棚栽培	袋料	27.60±14.06 B c	8.19±1.66 B b	4.54±0.89 C c	11.68±0.92 A a	6.22±1.11 A c	10.42±2.48 C c
仿野生栽培	袋料	31.41±12.60 B c	8.63±1.81 B b	4.93±0.79 C c	9.54±0.67 B b	5.41±1.65 A c	11.15±1.82 C c

采收日期	单芝鲜重/g	伞盖宽径/cm	伞盖窄径/cm	伞盖厚度/mm	芝柄长度/cm	芝柄直径/mm
2022-08-26	160.03±70.71 a	13.17±1.86 a	6.43±0.82 a	11.23±0.41 b	7.93±0.89 a	19.63±3.94 a
2022-09-07	109.69±52.97 a	12.44±3.17 a	6.75±1.41 a	12.35±1.53 b	7.25±0.93 a	17.56±3.80 ab
2022-09-19	111.79±52.18 a	12.56±1.72 a	6.06±1.35 a	15.40±2.80 a	7.58±0.55 a	14.82±2.89 b