Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2025, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (4): 1005-1010.DOI: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20240019
LAI Zeping1(), LU Wenjing1, CHEN Di1, ZHANG Cen1, XIAO Chaogeng1, PAN Leiming2, GU Xiuying3, XU Shuangyang2, ZHU Haojie4, YE Qin4,*(
)
Received:
2024-01-08
Online:
2025-04-11
Published:
2025-05-09
Contact:
YE Qin
CLC Number:
LAI Zeping, LU Wenjing, CHEN Di, ZHANG Cen, XIAO Chaogeng, PAN Leiming, GU Xiuying, XU Shuangyang, ZHU Haojie, YE Qin. Study on detecting honey quality based on FTIR technology[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(4): 1005-1010.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnykx.cn/EN/10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20240019
品种 | 每100 g样品 中葡萄糖含量/g | 每100 g样品 中果糖含量/g |
---|---|---|
洋槐蜜 | 30.9 | 42.6 |
枇杷蜜 | 30.0 | 39.7 |
土蜂蜜 | 31.5 | 33.8 |
多花种蜂蜜 | 32.3 | 35.5 |
薰衣草蜜 | 31.2 | 34.8 |
荆条蜜 | 31.5 | 34.7 |
椴树蜂蜜 | 33.0 | 34.9 |
党参蜂蜜 | 31.2 | 36.0 |
黄芪蜂蜜 | 31.0 | 35.9 |
桂花蜜 | 32.6 | 37.0 |
野菊花蜜 | 29.6 | 36.8 |
雪脂莲蜜 | 31.4 | 37.5 |
枸杞蜜 | 32.8 | 38.1 |
益母草蜜 | 30.9 | 36.6 |
果葡糖浆 | 23.2 | 31.0 |
Table 1 Physico-chemical results of glucose and fructose content in honey samples and fructose syrups
品种 | 每100 g样品 中葡萄糖含量/g | 每100 g样品 中果糖含量/g |
---|---|---|
洋槐蜜 | 30.9 | 42.6 |
枇杷蜜 | 30.0 | 39.7 |
土蜂蜜 | 31.5 | 33.8 |
多花种蜂蜜 | 32.3 | 35.5 |
薰衣草蜜 | 31.2 | 34.8 |
荆条蜜 | 31.5 | 34.7 |
椴树蜂蜜 | 33.0 | 34.9 |
党参蜂蜜 | 31.2 | 36.0 |
黄芪蜂蜜 | 31.0 | 35.9 |
桂花蜜 | 32.6 | 37.0 |
野菊花蜜 | 29.6 | 36.8 |
雪脂莲蜜 | 31.4 | 37.5 |
枸杞蜜 | 32.8 | 38.1 |
益母草蜜 | 30.9 | 36.6 |
果葡糖浆 | 23.2 | 31.0 |
建模方法 | 葡萄糖 | 果糖 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
r | RMSEC | RMSEP | r | RMSEC | RMSEP | |
PLS | 0.982 4 | 1.30 | 1.92 | 0.986 6 | 1.54 | 1.58 |
PCR | 0.975 7 | 1.53 | 2.13 | 0.976 2 | 2.05 | 2.02 |
CLS | 0.089 9 | 7.22 | 7.36 | 0.158 8 | 9.65 | 9.35 |
SMLR | 0.945 7 | 2.26 | 2.67 | 0.898 9 | 4.15 | 3.70 |
Table 2 Effect of four chemometric methods on the stability of models for glucose and fructose indicators in honey
建模方法 | 葡萄糖 | 果糖 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
r | RMSEC | RMSEP | r | RMSEC | RMSEP | |
PLS | 0.982 4 | 1.30 | 1.92 | 0.986 6 | 1.54 | 1.58 |
PCR | 0.975 7 | 1.53 | 2.13 | 0.976 2 | 2.05 | 2.02 |
CLS | 0.089 9 | 7.22 | 7.36 | 0.158 8 | 9.65 | 9.35 |
SMLR | 0.945 7 | 2.26 | 2.67 | 0.898 9 | 4.15 | 3.70 |
预处理方法 | 葡萄糖 | 果糖 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
r | RMSEC | RMSEP | r | RMSEC | RMSEP | |
原始 | 0.982 4 | 1.30 | 1.92 | 0.986 6 | 1.54 | 1.58 |
SNV | 0.973 3 | 1.60 | 2.15 | 0.987 8 | 1.47 | 1.53 |
一阶导数 | 0.984 0 | 1.24 | 2.26 | 0.987 8 | 1.48 | 1.53 |
二阶导数 | 0.937 6 | 2.42 | 3.68 | 0.984 3 | 1.67 | 1.81 |
3点平滑 | 0.982 4 | 1.30 | 1.92 | 0.986 6 | 1.54 | 1.58 |
5点平滑 | 0.982 4 | 1.30 | 1.92 | 0.986 6 | 1.54 | 1.58 |
MSC | 0.973 4 | 1.60 | 2.15 | 0.987 8 | 1.48 | 1.53 |
Table 3 PLS full-wave spectral model pre-processing of glucose and fructose in 546 samples
预处理方法 | 葡萄糖 | 果糖 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
r | RMSEC | RMSEP | r | RMSEC | RMSEP | |
原始 | 0.982 4 | 1.30 | 1.92 | 0.986 6 | 1.54 | 1.58 |
SNV | 0.973 3 | 1.60 | 2.15 | 0.987 8 | 1.47 | 1.53 |
一阶导数 | 0.984 0 | 1.24 | 2.26 | 0.987 8 | 1.48 | 1.53 |
二阶导数 | 0.937 6 | 2.42 | 3.68 | 0.984 3 | 1.67 | 1.81 |
3点平滑 | 0.982 4 | 1.30 | 1.92 | 0.986 6 | 1.54 | 1.58 |
5点平滑 | 0.982 4 | 1.30 | 1.92 | 0.986 6 | 1.54 | 1.58 |
MSC | 0.973 4 | 1.60 | 2.15 | 0.987 8 | 1.48 | 1.53 |
区间选择 | 波谱区间/cm-1 | r | RMSEC | RMSEP |
---|---|---|---|---|
iPLS-100 | 1 200~1 300 | 0.553 7 | 5.80 | 6.07 |
iPLS-200 | 1 000~1 200 | 0.987 3 | 1.11 | 1.99 |
iPLS-300 | 1 000~1 300 | 0.987 7 | 1.09 | 1.94 |
iPLS-400 | 800~1 200 | 0.991 6 | 0.91 | 0.94 |
iPLS-500 | 900~1 400 | 0.990 6 | 0.95 | 1.87 |
iPLS-1 000 | 400~1 400 | 0.989 6 | 1.00 | 1.92 |
Table 4 Effect of different spectral intervals on the model for glucose indicator in honey
区间选择 | 波谱区间/cm-1 | r | RMSEC | RMSEP |
---|---|---|---|---|
iPLS-100 | 1 200~1 300 | 0.553 7 | 5.80 | 6.07 |
iPLS-200 | 1 000~1 200 | 0.987 3 | 1.11 | 1.99 |
iPLS-300 | 1 000~1 300 | 0.987 7 | 1.09 | 1.94 |
iPLS-400 | 800~1 200 | 0.991 6 | 0.91 | 0.94 |
iPLS-500 | 900~1 400 | 0.990 6 | 0.95 | 1.87 |
iPLS-1 000 | 400~1 400 | 0.989 6 | 1.00 | 1.92 |
区间选择 | 波谱区间/cm-1 | r | RMSEC | RMSEP |
---|---|---|---|---|
iPLS-100 | 900~1 000 | 0.988 0 | 1.46 | 1.38 |
iPLS-200 | 1 000~1 200 | 0.988 3 | 1.45 | 1.40 |
iPLS-300 | 1 000~1 300 | 0.988 2 | 1.45 | 1.46 |
iPLS-400 | 800~1 200 | 0.993 5 | 1.03 | 0.99 |
iPLS-500 | 900~1 400 | 0.989 2 | 1.38 | 1.29 |
iPLS-1000 | 400~1 400 | 0.989 5 | 1.37 | 1.45 |
Table 5 Effect of different spectral intervals on the model for fructose indicator in honey
区间选择 | 波谱区间/cm-1 | r | RMSEC | RMSEP |
---|---|---|---|---|
iPLS-100 | 900~1 000 | 0.988 0 | 1.46 | 1.38 |
iPLS-200 | 1 000~1 200 | 0.988 3 | 1.45 | 1.40 |
iPLS-300 | 1 000~1 300 | 0.988 2 | 1.45 | 1.46 |
iPLS-400 | 800~1 200 | 0.993 5 | 1.03 | 0.99 |
iPLS-500 | 900~1 400 | 0.989 2 | 1.38 | 1.29 |
iPLS-1000 | 400~1 400 | 0.989 5 | 1.37 | 1.45 |
验证 | 化学值 | 预测值 | 相对误差/% |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 52.08 | 51.56 | 1.01 |
2 | 34.16 | 34.14 | 0.06 |
3 | 39.96 | 39.79 | 0.43 |
4 | 36.94 | 36.85 | 0.24 |
5 | 39.26 | 39.22 | 0.10 |
6 | 33.50 | 33.37 | 0.39 |
7 | 53.68 | 52.19 | 2.85 |
8 | 46.52 | 46.34 | 0.39 |
9 | 53.48 | 52.87 | 1.15 |
10 | 32.20 | 32.01 | 0.59 |
11 | 33.82 | 33.80 | 0.06 |
12 | 34.64 | 34.37 | 0.79 |
13 | 32.10 | 31.81 | 0.94 |
14 | 33.52 | 32.26 | 3.91 |
15 | 42.50 | 42.13 | 0.88 |
16 | 34.24 | 33.93 | 0.91 |
17 | 35.84 | 35.73 | 0.31 |
18 | 51.88 | 51.58 | 0.58 |
19 | 45.42 | 45.24 | 0.40 |
20 | 49.96 | 49.05 | 1.86 |
平均相对误差/% | 0.89 |
Table 6 Validation of the glucose indicator model with 20 unknown samples
验证 | 化学值 | 预测值 | 相对误差/% |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 52.08 | 51.56 | 1.01 |
2 | 34.16 | 34.14 | 0.06 |
3 | 39.96 | 39.79 | 0.43 |
4 | 36.94 | 36.85 | 0.24 |
5 | 39.26 | 39.22 | 0.10 |
6 | 33.50 | 33.37 | 0.39 |
7 | 53.68 | 52.19 | 2.85 |
8 | 46.52 | 46.34 | 0.39 |
9 | 53.48 | 52.87 | 1.15 |
10 | 32.20 | 32.01 | 0.59 |
11 | 33.82 | 33.80 | 0.06 |
12 | 34.64 | 34.37 | 0.79 |
13 | 32.10 | 31.81 | 0.94 |
14 | 33.52 | 32.26 | 3.91 |
15 | 42.50 | 42.13 | 0.88 |
16 | 34.24 | 33.93 | 0.91 |
17 | 35.84 | 35.73 | 0.31 |
18 | 51.88 | 51.58 | 0.58 |
19 | 45.42 | 45.24 | 0.40 |
20 | 49.96 | 49.05 | 1.86 |
平均相对误差/% | 0.89 |
验证 | 化学值 | 预测值 | 相对误差/% |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 39.10 | 38.81 | 0.75 |
2 | 40.65 | 40.18 | 1.17 |
3 | 48.40 | 47.69 | 1.49 |
4 | 39.55 | 38.68 | 2.25 |
5 | 41.10 | 40.31 | 1.96 |
6 | 47.90 | 47.58 | 0.67 |
7 | 47.40 | 45.40 | 4.41 |
8 | 56.70 | 55.90 | 1.43 |
9 | 46.30 | 45.38 | 2.03 |
10 | 52.50 | 51.80 | 1.35 |
11 | 36.00 | 34.63 | 3.96 |
12 | 39.35 | 38.45 | 2.34 |
13 | 50.20 | 49.68 | 1.05 |
14 | 46.20 | 45.85 | 0.76 |
15 | 49.90 | 49.57 | 0.67 |
16 | 59.20 | 59.19 | 0.02 |
17 | 58.30 | 58.23 | 0.12 |
18 | 45.70 | 45.42 | 0.62 |
19 | 43.00 | 42.47 | 1.25 |
20 | 64.70 | 63.49 | 1.91 |
平均相对误差/% | 1.51 |
Table 7 Validation of the fructose indicator model with 20 unknown samples
验证 | 化学值 | 预测值 | 相对误差/% |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 39.10 | 38.81 | 0.75 |
2 | 40.65 | 40.18 | 1.17 |
3 | 48.40 | 47.69 | 1.49 |
4 | 39.55 | 38.68 | 2.25 |
5 | 41.10 | 40.31 | 1.96 |
6 | 47.90 | 47.58 | 0.67 |
7 | 47.40 | 45.40 | 4.41 |
8 | 56.70 | 55.90 | 1.43 |
9 | 46.30 | 45.38 | 2.03 |
10 | 52.50 | 51.80 | 1.35 |
11 | 36.00 | 34.63 | 3.96 |
12 | 39.35 | 38.45 | 2.34 |
13 | 50.20 | 49.68 | 1.05 |
14 | 46.20 | 45.85 | 0.76 |
15 | 49.90 | 49.57 | 0.67 |
16 | 59.20 | 59.19 | 0.02 |
17 | 58.30 | 58.23 | 0.12 |
18 | 45.70 | 45.42 | 0.62 |
19 | 43.00 | 42.47 | 1.25 |
20 | 64.70 | 63.49 | 1.91 |
平均相对误差/% | 1.51 |
[1] | 王琪琦, 杜欣玥, 高西贝, 等. 蜂蜜功能活性及药用价值研究进展[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2022, 13(18): 5849-5854. |
[2] | 高文佳, 张海华, 马雪巍, 等. 基于中红外光谱法快速检测蜂蜜中还原糖的研究[J]. 中国蜂业, 2017, 68(5):52-54. |
[3] | MOBAROK ALI A T, AL-HUMAYYD M S, AL-SWAYEH O A. Does a glucose-fructose-sucrose-maltose mixture (as present in honey) really possess gastric protection effects?[J]. Pharmacological Research, 2001, 43(5):511-512. |
[4] | WEI G X, HUANG J K, YANG. Honey safety standards and its impacts on China’s honey export[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2012, 11(4):684-693. |
[5] | 中国养蜂学会. 2021中国蜂蜜出口情况[J]. 蜜蜂杂志, 2022, 42(1): 62-63. |
[6] | 赵延华, 刘成雁, 韩旭, 等. 傅里叶变换红外光谱法快速鉴别掺假蜂蜜[J]. 理化检验-化学分册, 2012, 48(2):136-139. |
[7] | PALUMBO D, GIORNI A, MINOCCHI R, et al. Optimization of machine learning techniques for the determination of clinical parameters in dried human serum samples from FTIR spectroscopic data[J]. Vibrational Spectroscopy, 2022, 121: 103408. |
[8] | 虞佳, 武春. 基于FTIR技术的食用植物油快速鉴别[J]. 黑龙江大学自然科学学报, 2022, 39(2):246-252. |
[9] | 郭城. 基于FTIR光谱的蜂王浆贮存条件判别及品质快速检测[D]. 杭州: 中国计量大学, 2021. |
[10] | 杜渝, 祝义伟, 肖琳, 等. 蜂蜜中水分果糖和葡萄糖的近红外定量分析模型[J]. 农产品加工学刊, 2012(6):121-123, 126. |
[11] | 赵苏艳. 衰减全反射红外光谱(ATR)在橡胶物证分析中的应用研究[J]. 云南化工, 2019, 46(1):66-68. |
[12] | 李水芳, 张欣, 李姣娟, 等. 拉曼光谱法无损检测蜂蜜中的果糖和葡萄糖含量[J]. 农业工程学报, 2014(6):249-255. |
[13] | 屠振华, 朱大洲, 籍保平, 等. 红外光谱技术在蜂蜜质量检测中的研究进展[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2010, 30(11):2971. |
[1] | ZHAO Zhongting, FAN Haichao, ZHANG Zhiheng, ZHANG Guihua. Effect of defoliation and ripening time on cotton yield and quality [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(3): 600-603. |
[2] | LUO Zhenbao, WANG Wenkai, ZHAO Erwei, ZHAI Xu, YU Song, CHEN Dan, ZHANG Long, Yang Xiaoe. Effect of the nano-carbon foliar fertilizer on tobacco quality in field [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(3): 609-614. |
[3] | FENG Zhansheng, LIANG Senmiao. Introduction performance and high-quality and efficient cultivation technology of Dongkui bayberry in Huaping County [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(3): 652-657. |
[4] | WANG Yang, MOU Wangbin, LIANG Senmiao. Effect of slope planting on the growth and fruiting of Dongkui bayberry [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(3): 658-661. |
[5] | GUO Taike, ZHAO Dandan, WENG Yayi, WANG Keying, HE Yuanhai, YAO Jigang, CHEN Wenxuan. Fluid ice preservation technology and its effects on storage quality of fresh food [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(3): 706-711. |
[6] | WANG Xiaoyu, WU Pan, WANG Chengli, YUE Wanfu. Study on honey identification based on fluorescence quantitative PCR method [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(3): 730-736. |
[7] | SONG Zhi, GUO Xinsong, FAN Zhongqing, QIAO Jiale, YIN Jing, SUN Xiao, LIU Tongxin, HONG Pizheng, DING Fangjun, YANG Yongcheng. Effects of irrigation water amount and humic acid dosage on yield, quality and water use of tomato [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(2): 336-343. |
[8] | GAO Jingwen, ZHANG Yuanyuan, YANG Yan, WANG Feng. Effects of reduced fertilization combined with soil amendment application on yield of Asparagus officinalis L. and soil quality under acidic conditions [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(2): 370-375. |
[9] | CUN Daize, LI Jing, DONG Jianmei, LAI Xinpu, YANG Di, PAN Li, DU Yuxia. Study on the quality change of citrus fruit at mature stage in hot and humid area of Yunnan [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(2): 386-394. |
[10] | YAN Haofeng, FANG Linguan, LOU Shulin, HUANG Haitao. Application of constant temperature far-infrared aroma extraction technology in improving flavor quality of tea resources in summer and autumn [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(2): 463-466. |
[11] | CHEN Jie, CAO Kuirong, WANG Baojun, JIANG Qifan. Effects of rice-crayfish co-cultivation on rice diseases and pests control and rice quality [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(2): 483-486. |
[12] | LIAN Zhenghua, CHEN Yiding, KONG Haimin, CHEN Hongjin. Quality evaluation of supplementary cultivated land and current problem analysis in Zhejiang Province [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(2): 507-510. |
[13] | MENG Huabing, ZHANG Qiyan, ZHOU Jinting, SUN Li, QIN Yebo. Current situation and development suggestions of rice industry in Wuxing District [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(2): 530-535. |
[14] | SU Hang, ZHOU Guoyan, SONG Xiaofei, LI Xiaoli, YAN Liying, XIE Yang. Effect of fertilizer reduction combined with organic water-soluble fertilizer on quality and yield of greenhouse cucumber [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(1): 106-110. |
[15] | LAN Haiyan, QIU Zhongcan, DING Fei, QI Xingjiang, QIU Dongliang, ZHENG Xiliang, LIANG Senmiao, ZHANG Shuwen. Effect of greenhouse facilities on the flowering and fruit quality of Myrica rubra [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(1): 115-119. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||