Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2025, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (5): 1133-1137.DOI: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20250143
Previous Articles Next Articles
CAI Pan1(), ZHANG Liquan1, SHI Nuyi2, QI Zirong1, XU Linying1,*(
)
Received:
2025-02-25
Online:
2025-05-11
Published:
2025-05-20
CLC Number:
CAI Pan, ZHANG Liquan, SHI Nuyi, QI Zirong, XU Linying. Planting density experiment of three different ginger varieties[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(5): 1133-1137.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnykx.cn/EN/10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20250143
时期 | 株距/cm | 株高/cm | 茎粗/mm | 分枝数 | 根鲜重/g | 茎鲜重/g | 叶鲜重/g | 根茎鲜重/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
发棵期 | 15 | 56.14±4.89 d | 9.98±0.74 e | 4.20±0.45 g | 10.73±0.68 e | 50.28±5.57 d | 37.02±2.03 f | 91.78±5.47 e |
20 | 55.32±5.13 d | 9.46±0.49 e | 4.40±0.55 g | 9.45±0.82 e | 56.70±6.47 d | 39.90±3.08 f | 95.74±8.43 e | |
25 | 55.44±4.19 d | 9.68±0.77 e | 5.60±0.89 f | 10.05±0.55 e | 54.50±6.01 d | 37.48±2.99 f | 94.22±5.79 e | |
根茎膨大期 | 15 | 63.64±3.23 c | 11.14±0.73 cd | 10.60±0.55 e | 19.68±1.00 d | 167.86±6.94 c | 76.22±7.50 e | 217.40±15.39 d |
20 | 62.56±2.18 c | 11.92±0.46 cd | 12.20±0.45 d | 20.56±1.37 d | 177.32±9.68 c | 92.52±5.89 d | 257.60±11.53 c | |
25 | 65.58±4.46 bc | 11.69±0.56 d | 13.40±0.55 c | 24.08±1.90 c | 174.50±7.30 c | 99.98±3.78 c | 268.88±15.60 c | |
收获期 | 15 | 76.76±2.48 a | 12.24±0.68 bc | 13.80±0.84 bc | 41.59±3.15 b | 246.50±6.09 a | 106.36±5.44 c | 294.62±9.36 b |
20 | 70.42±2.51 b | 13.60±0.78 a | 14.40±0.55 b | 40.80±2.61 b | 244.04±8.66 ab | 117.36±6.77 b | 318.62±18.64 a | |
25 | 68.96±4.29 b | 12.81±0.30 ab | 16.80±0.84 a | 44.94±3.41 a | 235.48±7.00 b | 134.32±6.49 a | 334.10±13.80 a |
Table 1 Comparison of plant growth of Lishui Xiaohuang ginger under different density levels
时期 | 株距/cm | 株高/cm | 茎粗/mm | 分枝数 | 根鲜重/g | 茎鲜重/g | 叶鲜重/g | 根茎鲜重/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
发棵期 | 15 | 56.14±4.89 d | 9.98±0.74 e | 4.20±0.45 g | 10.73±0.68 e | 50.28±5.57 d | 37.02±2.03 f | 91.78±5.47 e |
20 | 55.32±5.13 d | 9.46±0.49 e | 4.40±0.55 g | 9.45±0.82 e | 56.70±6.47 d | 39.90±3.08 f | 95.74±8.43 e | |
25 | 55.44±4.19 d | 9.68±0.77 e | 5.60±0.89 f | 10.05±0.55 e | 54.50±6.01 d | 37.48±2.99 f | 94.22±5.79 e | |
根茎膨大期 | 15 | 63.64±3.23 c | 11.14±0.73 cd | 10.60±0.55 e | 19.68±1.00 d | 167.86±6.94 c | 76.22±7.50 e | 217.40±15.39 d |
20 | 62.56±2.18 c | 11.92±0.46 cd | 12.20±0.45 d | 20.56±1.37 d | 177.32±9.68 c | 92.52±5.89 d | 257.60±11.53 c | |
25 | 65.58±4.46 bc | 11.69±0.56 d | 13.40±0.55 c | 24.08±1.90 c | 174.50±7.30 c | 99.98±3.78 c | 268.88±15.60 c | |
收获期 | 15 | 76.76±2.48 a | 12.24±0.68 bc | 13.80±0.84 bc | 41.59±3.15 b | 246.50±6.09 a | 106.36±5.44 c | 294.62±9.36 b |
20 | 70.42±2.51 b | 13.60±0.78 a | 14.40±0.55 b | 40.80±2.61 b | 244.04±8.66 ab | 117.36±6.77 b | 318.62±18.64 a | |
25 | 68.96±4.29 b | 12.81±0.30 ab | 16.80±0.84 a | 44.94±3.41 a | 235.48±7.00 b | 134.32±6.49 a | 334.10±13.80 a |
时期 | 株距/cm | 株高/cm | 茎粗/mm | 分枝数 | 根鲜重/g | 茎鲜重/g | 叶鲜重/g | 根茎鲜重/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
发棵期 | 15 | 57.92±2.86 d | 9.68±0.56 c | 6.80±0.84 f | 10.22±0.78 e | 58.38±6.65 d | 32.88±4.11 d | 95.76±6.63 f |
20 | 58.70±4.18 d | 9.45±0.43 c | 7.20±0.84 f | 9.67±0.38 e | 58.08±6.69 d | 35.08±3.53 d | 92.76±7.79 f | |
25 | 58.16±7.76 d | 9.68±0.86 c | 8.60±0.55 e | 10.43±0.77 e | 58.42±7.27 d | 32.88±4.18 d | 93.88±8.77 f | |
根茎膨大期 | 15 | 72.10±5.11 c | 11.49±0.71 b | 13.20±0.84 d | 21.17±1.27 d | 176.56±7.67 c | 92.22±5.24 c | 202.56±18.36 e |
20 | 68.70±7.70 c | 11.79±0.64 b | 12.40±0.55 d | 20.92±1.09 d | 171.62±4.63 c | 88.74±4.68 c | 244.76±11.84 d | |
25 | 67.68±4.45 c | 11.60±0.59 b | 14.80±0.84 c | 24.32±1.20 c | 170.72±11.67 c | 89.22±3.13 c | 273.02±15.89 c | |
收获期 | 15 | 87.42±2.90 a | 13.58±0.58 a | 16.60±0.89 b | 38.50±1.79 b | 283.04±13.48 a | 116.20±5.56 b | 309.66±19.49 b |
20 | 79.58±3.47 b | 13.64±0.62 a | 16.20±0.84 b | 39.68±2.84 b | 261.38±13.32 b | 121.46±6.68 b | 323.58±14.77 b | |
25 | 78.66±3.97 b | 13.63±0.51 a | 18.60±0.89 a | 43.37±2.93 a | 256.08±10.64 b | 133.58±6.38 a | 342.10±16.39 a |
Table 2 Comparison of plant growth of Jiaxing Hongzhao ginger under different density levels
时期 | 株距/cm | 株高/cm | 茎粗/mm | 分枝数 | 根鲜重/g | 茎鲜重/g | 叶鲜重/g | 根茎鲜重/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
发棵期 | 15 | 57.92±2.86 d | 9.68±0.56 c | 6.80±0.84 f | 10.22±0.78 e | 58.38±6.65 d | 32.88±4.11 d | 95.76±6.63 f |
20 | 58.70±4.18 d | 9.45±0.43 c | 7.20±0.84 f | 9.67±0.38 e | 58.08±6.69 d | 35.08±3.53 d | 92.76±7.79 f | |
25 | 58.16±7.76 d | 9.68±0.86 c | 8.60±0.55 e | 10.43±0.77 e | 58.42±7.27 d | 32.88±4.18 d | 93.88±8.77 f | |
根茎膨大期 | 15 | 72.10±5.11 c | 11.49±0.71 b | 13.20±0.84 d | 21.17±1.27 d | 176.56±7.67 c | 92.22±5.24 c | 202.56±18.36 e |
20 | 68.70±7.70 c | 11.79±0.64 b | 12.40±0.55 d | 20.92±1.09 d | 171.62±4.63 c | 88.74±4.68 c | 244.76±11.84 d | |
25 | 67.68±4.45 c | 11.60±0.59 b | 14.80±0.84 c | 24.32±1.20 c | 170.72±11.67 c | 89.22±3.13 c | 273.02±15.89 c | |
收获期 | 15 | 87.42±2.90 a | 13.58±0.58 a | 16.60±0.89 b | 38.50±1.79 b | 283.04±13.48 a | 116.20±5.56 b | 309.66±19.49 b |
20 | 79.58±3.47 b | 13.64±0.62 a | 16.20±0.84 b | 39.68±2.84 b | 261.38±13.32 b | 121.46±6.68 b | 323.58±14.77 b | |
25 | 78.66±3.97 b | 13.63±0.51 a | 18.60±0.89 a | 43.37±2.93 a | 256.08±10.64 b | 133.58±6.38 a | 342.10±16.39 a |
时期 | 株距/cm | 株高/cm | 茎粗/mm | 分枝数 | 根鲜重/g | 茎鲜重/g | 叶鲜重/g | 根茎鲜重/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
发棵期 | 15 | 66.70±3.55 d | 10.15±0.36 c | 7.20±0.45 f | 10.75±0.60 e | 93.44±6.72 d | 43.76±3.73 c | 108.10±8.05 f |
20 | 59.74±5.99 e | 10.43±0.84 c | 7.80±0.84 f | 10.39±0.70 e | 86.56±6.18 d | 41.28±3.51 c | 118.50±7.91 f | |
25 | 58.20±5.32 e | 9.79±0.74 c | 9.20±0.84 e | 10.16±0.50 e | 93.10±5.35d | 39.78±2.82 c | 112.34±6.02 f | |
根茎膨大期 | 15 | 82.32±3.57 bc | 11.91±0.66 b | 15.40±0.55 d | 23.34±1.47 d | 198.34±14.27 c | 106.62±10.95 b | 293.32±19.30 e |
20 | 76.66±5.21 c | 11.89±0.58 b | 15.60±0.55 d | 23.08±1.45 d | 211.18±10.64 c | 114.30±7.39 b | 285.62±15.55 e | |
25 | 75.94±6.02 c | 11.57±0.43 b | 17.20±0.84 c | 25.80±1.81 c | 203.98±11.61 c | 104.22±8.20 b | 321.32±10.35 d | |
收获期 | 15 | 93.22±6.26 a | 13.90±0.49 a | 18.60±0.55 b | 42.07±2.84 b | 273.24±17.83 b | 142.30±9.86 a | 351.20±10.47 c |
20 | 87.26±3.78 b | 14.36±0.79 a | 19.00±0.71 b | 42.23±2.50 b | 300.72±8.54 a | 152.44±8.25 a | 371.12±18.42 b | |
25 | 85.04±3.88 b | 13.57±0.77 a | 20.80±1.30 a | 47.49±1.55 a | 286.46±16.49 ab | 142.96±10.85 a | 420.34±23.74 a |
Table 3 Comparison of plant growth of Laiwu little ginger under different density levels
时期 | 株距/cm | 株高/cm | 茎粗/mm | 分枝数 | 根鲜重/g | 茎鲜重/g | 叶鲜重/g | 根茎鲜重/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
发棵期 | 15 | 66.70±3.55 d | 10.15±0.36 c | 7.20±0.45 f | 10.75±0.60 e | 93.44±6.72 d | 43.76±3.73 c | 108.10±8.05 f |
20 | 59.74±5.99 e | 10.43±0.84 c | 7.80±0.84 f | 10.39±0.70 e | 86.56±6.18 d | 41.28±3.51 c | 118.50±7.91 f | |
25 | 58.20±5.32 e | 9.79±0.74 c | 9.20±0.84 e | 10.16±0.50 e | 93.10±5.35d | 39.78±2.82 c | 112.34±6.02 f | |
根茎膨大期 | 15 | 82.32±3.57 bc | 11.91±0.66 b | 15.40±0.55 d | 23.34±1.47 d | 198.34±14.27 c | 106.62±10.95 b | 293.32±19.30 e |
20 | 76.66±5.21 c | 11.89±0.58 b | 15.60±0.55 d | 23.08±1.45 d | 211.18±10.64 c | 114.30±7.39 b | 285.62±15.55 e | |
25 | 75.94±6.02 c | 11.57±0.43 b | 17.20±0.84 c | 25.80±1.81 c | 203.98±11.61 c | 104.22±8.20 b | 321.32±10.35 d | |
收获期 | 15 | 93.22±6.26 a | 13.90±0.49 a | 18.60±0.55 b | 42.07±2.84 b | 273.24±17.83 b | 142.30±9.86 a | 351.20±10.47 c |
20 | 87.26±3.78 b | 14.36±0.79 a | 19.00±0.71 b | 42.23±2.50 b | 300.72±8.54 a | 152.44±8.25 a | 371.12±18.42 b | |
25 | 85.04±3.88 b | 13.57±0.77 a | 20.80±1.30 a | 47.49±1.55 a | 286.46±16.49 ab | 142.96±10.85 a | 420.34±23.74 a |
品种 | 株距/cm | 小区产量/kg | 667 m2产量/kg |
---|---|---|---|
丽水小黄姜 | 15 | 41.77±1.30 d | 1 856.52±57.69 d |
20 | 36.40±0.73 e | 1 617.87±32.59 e | |
25 | 33.51±1.08 f | 1 489.13±48.13 f | |
嘉兴红爪姜 | 15 | 44.63±1.14 c | 1 983.41±50.56 c |
20 | 41.38±1.20 d | 1 839.11±53.25 d | |
25 | 37.57±1.09 e | 1 669.78±48.40 e | |
莱芜小姜 | 15 | 48.46±0.96 b | 2 153.66±42.65 b |
20 | 53.21±1.33 a | 2 364.87±58.95 a | |
25 | 45.10±1.28 c | 2 004.30±56.76 c |
Table 4 Effects of planting density on ginger yield of three ginger varieties
品种 | 株距/cm | 小区产量/kg | 667 m2产量/kg |
---|---|---|---|
丽水小黄姜 | 15 | 41.77±1.30 d | 1 856.52±57.69 d |
20 | 36.40±0.73 e | 1 617.87±32.59 e | |
25 | 33.51±1.08 f | 1 489.13±48.13 f | |
嘉兴红爪姜 | 15 | 44.63±1.14 c | 1 983.41±50.56 c |
20 | 41.38±1.20 d | 1 839.11±53.25 d | |
25 | 37.57±1.09 e | 1 669.78±48.40 e | |
莱芜小姜 | 15 | 48.46±0.96 b | 2 153.66±42.65 b |
20 | 53.21±1.33 a | 2 364.87±58.95 a | |
25 | 45.10±1.28 c | 2 004.30±56.76 c |
品种 | 株距/cm | 干物质含量/% | 淀粉含量/% | 可溶性蛋白含量/ (mg·g-1) | 游离氨基酸含量/ (mg·g-1) | 抗坏血酸含量/ (mg·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
丽水小黄姜 | 15 | 12.99±0.23 b | 7.25±0.69 c | 4.50±0.19 b | 0.42±0.04 b | 24.3±2.4 a |
20 | 12.96±0.70 b | 7.10±0.78 c | 4.48±0.22 b | 0.41±0.04 b | 23.5±2.9 a | |
25 | 13.31±0.47 b | 7.24±0.66 c | 4.36±0.27 b | 0.47±0.06 ab | 24.1±2.7 a | |
嘉兴红爪姜 | 15 | 13.47±0.53 b | 6.84±0.65 c | 3.82±0.21 c | 0.43±0.04 b | 23.9±1.5 a |
20 | 12.89±0.68 b | 7.15±0.68 c | 3.79±0.26 c | 0.44±0.04 b | 24.0±1.8 a | |
25 | 14.35±0.43 a | 7.48±0.52 c | 3.68±0.16 c | 0.41±0.03 b | 24.9±1.2 a | |
莱芜小姜 | 15 | 13.49±0.38 b | 8.58±0.67 b | 5.38±0.20 a | 0.57±0.05 a | 24.5±1.1 a |
20 | 13.32±0.31 b | 9.21±0.25 ab | 5.25±0.14 a | 0.55±0.05 a | 24.6±2.0 a | |
25 | 14.83±0.29 a | 9.91±0.33 a | 5.23±0.32 a | 0.52±0.05 a | 24.4±2.2 a |
Table 5 Effects of planting density on nutritional quality of three ginger varieties
品种 | 株距/cm | 干物质含量/% | 淀粉含量/% | 可溶性蛋白含量/ (mg·g-1) | 游离氨基酸含量/ (mg·g-1) | 抗坏血酸含量/ (mg·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
丽水小黄姜 | 15 | 12.99±0.23 b | 7.25±0.69 c | 4.50±0.19 b | 0.42±0.04 b | 24.3±2.4 a |
20 | 12.96±0.70 b | 7.10±0.78 c | 4.48±0.22 b | 0.41±0.04 b | 23.5±2.9 a | |
25 | 13.31±0.47 b | 7.24±0.66 c | 4.36±0.27 b | 0.47±0.06 ab | 24.1±2.7 a | |
嘉兴红爪姜 | 15 | 13.47±0.53 b | 6.84±0.65 c | 3.82±0.21 c | 0.43±0.04 b | 23.9±1.5 a |
20 | 12.89±0.68 b | 7.15±0.68 c | 3.79±0.26 c | 0.44±0.04 b | 24.0±1.8 a | |
25 | 14.35±0.43 a | 7.48±0.52 c | 3.68±0.16 c | 0.41±0.03 b | 24.9±1.2 a | |
莱芜小姜 | 15 | 13.49±0.38 b | 8.58±0.67 b | 5.38±0.20 a | 0.57±0.05 a | 24.5±1.1 a |
20 | 13.32±0.31 b | 9.21±0.25 ab | 5.25±0.14 a | 0.55±0.05 a | 24.6±2.0 a | |
25 | 14.83±0.29 a | 9.91±0.33 a | 5.23±0.32 a | 0.52±0.05 a | 24.4±2.2 a |
[1] | 李港, 彭慧敏, 蔡小东, 等. 5个生姜品种对淹水胁迫的生理响应及耐涝性评价[J]. 南方农业学报, 2022, 53(8): 2196-2204. |
[2] | 杨映, 张玲玲, 梁华儒, 等. 生姜种质资源耐干热性评价及其鉴定指标筛选[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2024, 32(5): 860-876. |
[3] | 李荟, 姜栋柱, 龚敏, 等. 重庆市新引进生姜品种农艺性状评价与筛选[J]. 耕作与栽培, 2024, 44(2): 39-44. |
[4] | 吴家丽, 曹家洪, 肖春光, 等. 不同姜块大小及密度对白水生姜生长的影响[J]. 长江蔬菜, 2023(18): 58-60. |
[5] | 李录久, 金继运, 陈防, 等. 钾、氮配施对生姜产量和品质及钾素利用的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2009, 15(3): 643-648. |
[6] | 李凌云. 莱芜小姜群体结构与产量构成因素试验分析[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2016(4): 125-127. |
[7] | 张玲玲, 周洁, 刘燃, 等. 生姜抗姜瘟病品种资源鉴定及其抗病生化机制[J]. 植物保护学报, 2023, 50(3): 767-779. |
[8] | 刘小岑, 吴艳碧, 田野, 等. 干旱胁迫对不同品种生姜苗期生长发育的影响[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2024, 47(5): 843-853. |
[9] | 王洁, 朱学栋, 孙冲, 等. 生姜品种对镉胁迫的生理响应及耐镉性评价[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2023, 42(11): 2410-2421. |
[10] | 高照海, 亓玉生, 毕京荣. 生姜茎基腐病的发生与绿色安全防治技术[J]. 蔬菜, 2022(4): 47-50. |
[11] | 侯月玲, 张西森, 潘云平, 等. 安丘生姜适宜播种期探讨[J]. 现代农村科技, 2015(16): 52-53. |
[12] | 李录久, 刘荣乐, 陈防, 等. 不同氮水平对生姜产量和品质及氮素吸收的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2010, 16(2): 382-388. |
[13] | 付丽军, 王永存, 张璐, 等. 生物有机肥部分替代化肥对生姜产量、养分利用效率及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2023, 36(8): 77-83. |
[14] | 郑开友, 任云, 李洪雷, 等. 玉米/生姜套作模式下玉米株型与行宽对生姜光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2022, 48(3): 310-320. |
[15] | 郭冬生, 彭小兰. 蒽酮比色法和酶水解法两种淀粉测定方法的比较研究[J]. 湖南文理学院学报(自然科学版), 2007, 19(3): 34-36, 48. |
[16] | 张志良. 植物生理学实验指导[M]. 2版. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 1990. |
[17] | 李合生. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000. |
[18] | 周弦, 刘续立, 熊诗洁, 等. 主要气候因子对长江上游生姜种植区姜瘟病发生动态的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2022, 51(5): 71-83. |
[19] | 王超飞, 段合明. 不同种植密度对生姜种植效果的影响[J]. 种子科技, 2021, 39(18): 135-136. |
[20] | 王奕斐, 王进成, 常建伟, 等. 生姜增加分枝的技术措施[J]. 蔬菜, 2021(4): 44-46. |
[21] | 邵宏升. 不同地力条件下种植密度及其与施肥互作对生姜产量的影响[J]. 蔬菜, 2024(6): 45-51. |
[22] | 徐坤, 赵德婉, 蒋先明. 应用15N示踪研究生姜吸氮规律[J]. 园艺学报, 1993, 20(2): 161-165. |
[1] | WANG Weiwei, WU Yongcheng, MEI Yi, YOU Chun, ZU Yanxia, SHEN Feng, LIU Zhe, ZHANG Lina, FENG Ruchao, ZHENG Jiaqiu. Impacts of organic fertilizer replacing chemical fertilizer on yield and soil properties of pepper [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(5): 1062-1065. |
[2] | TENG Liyao, FAN Chenggen, ZHANG Zuqing, LI Yun, LIU Yang, XIAO Peng, HUA Liqin, OUYANG Weiwei, XU Xiaojuan, CHEN Ronghua. Comprehensive agronomic traits and yield analysis of new peanut varieties [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(5): 1066-1071. |
[3] | YUE Yani, WANG Ying, GAO Xianyi, TAO Yujia, LIN Tingwei, LIU Shudong, XU Jingcheng, QI Huijuan. Effects of fruit number on yield and quality of melon cultivated in greenhouse [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(5): 1082-1086. |
[4] | CHEN Yanhua, SUN Lian, LU Yan, HU Liang, LI Fangyong, HAN Kefeng. Effect of earthworm organic liquid fertilizer on strawberry growth [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(5): 1087-1090. |
[5] | WANG Dongqun, CHENG Meiling, WANG Li. Absorption characteristics of N,P, K,Fe,Cu and Mn in cabbage Chunfeng 007 [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(5): 1104-1108. |
[6] | ZHANG Zhiwei, QIN Yaoguo, YONG Qinqin, LIU Baiqing, LIU Jinxiong, DUAN Fang, LI Yilin, YANG Cuiqia. Effects of biodegradable mulch film coverage on soil temperature, moisture, and yield of summer-sown sweet potato [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(5): 1126-1132. |
[7] | YANG Dehai, MA Junjie, PENG Xiaoci, ZHAO Weijin, XIE Yiyan, YANG Yan, FENG Canhu, PENG Ren, HUANG Wei, XUE Bo, WANG Yannan, OUYANG Chengren. Effects of different topping measures on yield and quality of K326 in Dali tobacco-growing areas [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(5): 1163-1166. |
[8] | ZHANG Quanfeng, LIU Cheng, JIANG Cong, ZHANG Yaofeng, NI Xiyuan, SHI Jianghua, WANG Tanliu, YU Huasheng, FU Ying. New multi-resistant, high-quality, mechanization-suitable rapeseed variety Zheyouza 59 [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(5): 1181-1184. |
[9] | ZHANG Xinyue, YE Shenghai, DONG Junjie, FU Haowei, LI Youfa. Breeding of new indica-japonica hybrid rice combination Zhejingjiayou 710 with high yield and good quality [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(4): 830-833. |
[10] | QIAN Yanjie, LI Cheng, YAO Yanhong, HU Mingyong, WANG Wei, JIANG Yu, LUO Wei, XIAO Feifei, WANG Shaoxi. Selection experiment of high-yield regenerated rice varieties suitable for Changsha Region [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(4): 848-853. |
[11] | TAO Ruofu, XIA Ruda. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer reduction combined with foliar silicon fertilizer on agronomic traits and yield of Huazheyou 261 [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(4): 854-857. |
[12] | LIU Guoqun, ZHU Chunquan, LIU Xiaoxia, LI Ronghui, YAN Wenting, SUN Xiuhua, SHANG Xiaolan, ZHU Lianfeng, TIAN Wenhao, ZHANG Junhua. Effects of different new fertilizer application on yield and quality of rice [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(4): 858-862. |
[13] | LI Shufen, CHAI Wenbo, XU Hanyuan, ZHU Qing, LI Hongtao, YUAN Chao, WANG Jun. Analysis of high yield and stable yield of silage maize in Huanghuaihai Region based on GGE biplot [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(4): 863-868. |
[14] | LIANG Mingran, DENG Qiwen, YAN Xiancheng, HUANG Dongrui, LIN Xiaonan, WANG Gangfeng, MAI Jiaqi. Screening test of high-quality fresh waxy corn varieties in Zhaoqing City [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(4): 874-878. |
[15] | CHEN Yixiang, ZHANG Xiaomei, GOU Yuhong, XIA Zaixing, GUO Tao, ZHANG Bisheng. Evaluation of disease resistance and high yield of different fresh waxy maize varieties [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(4): 879-884. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||