Trapping effect of four kinds of armyworm plates on the adults of fruit flies in vegetable field

doi:10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.202301477

Abstract

Abstract:

The trapping effects of four manufacturers' sticky boards on fruit fly adults was studied and the influence of hanging height on the trapping effectiveness of sticky boards was clarified. The results showed that the fruit flies trapped in the vegetable fields of Yongkang City were identified as two species, pumpkin fruit fly and striped fruit fly, with the pumpkin fruit fly being the main species. The proportion of trapped female flies was the highest for the Wanyingmi brand sticky board, accounting for 35.14% of the total trapped females. The trapping effect of the Nongzhuangbao brand sticky board was the best. Within 3 days, the average number of fruit flies trapped per sticky board was 170.22, which was significantly higher than that of the other three sticky boards. When applying sticky boards to trap and kill fruit flies in towel gourd fields, the hanging height of the sticky board should be in the middle and lower part of the towel gourd rack.

Key words: fruit flies, sticky insect boards, trap effect

CLC Number:

S433.89

Yuehong LI, Min WANG, Shengguang XIA. Trapping effect of four kinds of armyworm plates on the adults of fruit flies in vegetable field[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(2): 371-374.

Figures/Tables 4

Fig.1 Morphological characteristics of each part of fruit flies

Table 1 Trapping effect of 4 types of sticky insect boards

黏虫板品牌	诱捕总数	雌成虫比例/%	南瓜实蝇		具条实蝇
黏虫板品牌	诱捕总数	雌成虫比例/%	占诱捕总数/%	雌成虫比例/%	占诱捕总数/%	雌成虫比例/%
神捕	808	23.02	93.94	23.45	6.06	16.33
实蝇信息素	761	19.32	93.43	19.69	6.57	14.00
万蝇迷	962	35.14	94.91	34.30	5.09	16.33
农庄宝	6 128	0.24	91.02	0.27	8.98	0

Fig.2 Trapping effect of sticky insect boards produced by 4 manufacturers on fruit flies

Fig.3 Trapping effect of sticky insect boards with different hanging heights on fruit flies

References 22

[1]	BELOKOBYLSKIJ S A, ZALDIVAR-RIVERÓN A, QUICKE D L J. Phylogeny of the Genera of the parasitic wasps subfamily Doryctinae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) based on morphological evidence[J]. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2004, 142(3): 369-404.
[2]	吴佳教, 梁帆, 梁广勤. 实蝇类重要害虫鉴定图册[M]. 广州: 广东科技出版社, 2009.
[3]	刘慎思, 张桂芬, 万方浩. 基于mtDNA COI基因的离腹寡毛实蝇属常见种DNA条形码识别和系统发育分析[J]. 昆虫学报, 2014, 57(3): 343-355.
[4]	梁广勤, 梁帆, 赵菊鹏, 等. 中国实蝇检疫研究概况[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2008, 30(4): 361-369.
[5]	张小亚, 陈国庆, 孟幼青, 等. 台州果蔬混栽橘园用性诱剂监测实蝇种群动态及效果评价[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2011, 52(6): 1368-1370.
[6]	陈涵. 应用ME和GF-120防治橘小实蝇的研究[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2008.
[7]	邝平, 李钊, 汤家红, 等. 几种橘小实蝇诱杀产品田间比较试验[J]. 中国南方果树, 2018, 47(1): 44-45.
[8]	王艳俏, 何春玲, 崔灿, 等. 金华市金东区橘小实蝇绿色防控示范区建设及成效[J]. 基层农技推广, 2020, 8(10): 91-93.
[9]	阿不都拉·艾克拜尔, 阿不都瓦哈·艾再孜, 阿地力·沙塔尔, 等. 枣实蝇对不同色差黄色黏虫板的趋性研究[J]. 新疆农业大学学报, 2017, 40(4): 283-287.
[10]	薛皇娃, 吴伟坚. 瓜实蝇对虚拟波长下不同颜色的趋性[J]. 昆虫学报, 2013, 56(2): 161-166.
[11]	汪燕琴, 孟幼青, 施祖华. 不同种类黄色粘板诱集柑橘小实蝇的效果[J]. 浙江柑橘, 2011, 28(3): 23-25.
[12]	李月红, 何陆芳, 叶良松, 等. 柑橘小实蝇成虫对不同色板的趋性差异[J]. 浙江柑橘, 2010, 27(4): 24-25.
[13]	戴建青, 韩诗畴, 李军, 等. 黄板加信息素对黄曲条跳甲成虫的田间诱集作用[J]. 南方农业学报, 2013, 44(3): 422-425.
[14]	付佑胜, 赵桂东, 潘建平, 等. 橘小实蝇引诱物质研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2006, 34(9): 1919-1921.
[15]	刘坤付, 周琼, 谭敏, 等. 岳麓山周边地区实蝇发生动态监测[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2012, 34(4): 420-424.
[16]	周庆贤, 梁帆, 梁广勤, 等. 应用光波技术诱捕橘小实蝇试验[J]. 广东农业科学, 2008, 35(3): 62-63, 76.
[17]	李月红, 张小亚, 孟幼青. “好黏”等不同诱剂对橘小实蝇的诱杀作用分析[J]. 中国南方果树, 2011, 40(4): 49-50.
[18]	孙太华. 4种黄色黏虫板对灌阳雪梨园果实蝇诱捕试验[J]. 广西植保, 2017, 30(3): 38-39.
[19]	匡石滋, 田世尧, 曾杨, 等. 黄板诱杀技术在防治橘小实蝇成虫中的应用研究[J]. 广东农业科学, 2009, 36(10): 105-106.
[20]	李月红, 黄子洪, 孟幼青. 好黏色板对柑橘小实蝇的诱杀效果[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2012, 53(5): 707-708.
[21]	龚碧涯, 刘慧, 向敏, 等. 悬挂方式对实蝇黏虫板诱杀橘小实蝇和天敌效果的影响[J]. 中国南方果树, 2019, 48(4): 17-20.
[22]	陈汉杰, 张金勇, 涂洪涛, 等. 苹果、梨园悬挂黄色粘板诱虫的生态效应[J]. 果树学报, 2012, 29(1): 86-89.