Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2025, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (4): 805-812.DOI: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20240741
Previous Articles Next Articles
MO Junjie(), WU Xiangyun, LIU Wentong, CHEN Churun, GAO Zhichao
Received:
2024-09-18
Online:
2025-04-11
Published:
2025-05-09
CLC Number:
MO Junjie, WU Xiangyun, LIU Wentong, CHEN Churun, GAO Zhichao. Study on variability of separated generations in rice population breeding[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(4): 805-812.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnykx.cn/EN/10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20240741
群体 | SPAD值 | 株高 | 单株穗数 | 剑叶长 | 穗长 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
均值 | CV/% | 均值/cm | CV/% | 均值 | CV/% | 均值/cm | CV/% | 均值/cm | CV/% | |
海S1 | 30.21 c | 9.51 | 81.95 d | 4.05 | 22.82 a | 27.98 | 15.98 d | 11.90 | 19.35 d | 7.02 |
HH12 | 31.99 b | 10.24 | 112.09 a | 4.96 | 6.24 d | 27.98 | 24.51 a | 10.00 | 26.23 a | 4.35 |
F2 | 30.79 bc | 11.70 | 96.66 c | 8.35 | 11.69 c | 36.79 | 21.62 b | 16.35 | 23.13 c | 8.77 |
F3 | 31.52 bc | 11.70 | 98.33 c | 8.56 | 14.07 b | 35.98 | 19.79 c | 18.86 | 22.52 c | 11.13 |
混合F2 | 34.06 a | 8.43 | 106.68 b | 13.49 | 6.36 d | 55.75 | 22.14 b | 18.72 | 24.32 b | 16.49 |
混合F3 | 34.71 a | 8.69 | 99.74 c | 11.15 | 12.60 bc | 47.21 | 21.23 b | 16.68 | 22.64 c | 12.32 |
群体 | 不育株率 | 穗粒数 | 结实率 | 千粒重 | 收获指数 | |||||
均值/% | CV/% | 均值 | CV/% | 均值/% | CV/% | 均值/g | CV/% | 均值 | CV/% | |
海S1 | 100.00 a | 0 | 78.28 d | 15.51 | 0.64 d | 65.32 | 19.65 b | 22.09 | 0 c | 0 |
HH12 | 0 e | 0 | 154.31 a | 15.21 | 81.75 a | 6.87 | 22.08 ab | 2.89 | 0.48 a | 11.10 |
F2 | 26.26 b | 68.11 | 104.25 c | 23.10 | 61.22 bc | 56.76 | 22.96 a | 25.85 | 0.38 b | 55.42 |
F3 | 19.23 c | 74.78 | 86.42 d | 37.38 | 55.67 c | 62.52 | 20.81 b | 33.74 | 0.31 c | 61.04 |
混合F2 | 13.41 d | 57.12 | 127.44 b | 37.36 | 67.25 b | 42.45 | 23.11 a | 17.39 | 0.37 bc | 40.74 |
混合F3 | 16.73 cd | 82.24 | 93.37 cd | 33.74 | 62.79 bc | 45.30 | 21.23 ab | 23.14 | 0.36 bc | 46.96 |
Table 1 Comparison of agronomic traits among different generations of rice hybrid Hai S1/HH12 population and mixed population
群体 | SPAD值 | 株高 | 单株穗数 | 剑叶长 | 穗长 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
均值 | CV/% | 均值/cm | CV/% | 均值 | CV/% | 均值/cm | CV/% | 均值/cm | CV/% | |
海S1 | 30.21 c | 9.51 | 81.95 d | 4.05 | 22.82 a | 27.98 | 15.98 d | 11.90 | 19.35 d | 7.02 |
HH12 | 31.99 b | 10.24 | 112.09 a | 4.96 | 6.24 d | 27.98 | 24.51 a | 10.00 | 26.23 a | 4.35 |
F2 | 30.79 bc | 11.70 | 96.66 c | 8.35 | 11.69 c | 36.79 | 21.62 b | 16.35 | 23.13 c | 8.77 |
F3 | 31.52 bc | 11.70 | 98.33 c | 8.56 | 14.07 b | 35.98 | 19.79 c | 18.86 | 22.52 c | 11.13 |
混合F2 | 34.06 a | 8.43 | 106.68 b | 13.49 | 6.36 d | 55.75 | 22.14 b | 18.72 | 24.32 b | 16.49 |
混合F3 | 34.71 a | 8.69 | 99.74 c | 11.15 | 12.60 bc | 47.21 | 21.23 b | 16.68 | 22.64 c | 12.32 |
群体 | 不育株率 | 穗粒数 | 结实率 | 千粒重 | 收获指数 | |||||
均值/% | CV/% | 均值 | CV/% | 均值/% | CV/% | 均值/g | CV/% | 均值 | CV/% | |
海S1 | 100.00 a | 0 | 78.28 d | 15.51 | 0.64 d | 65.32 | 19.65 b | 22.09 | 0 c | 0 |
HH12 | 0 e | 0 | 154.31 a | 15.21 | 81.75 a | 6.87 | 22.08 ab | 2.89 | 0.48 a | 11.10 |
F2 | 26.26 b | 68.11 | 104.25 c | 23.10 | 61.22 bc | 56.76 | 22.96 a | 25.85 | 0.38 b | 55.42 |
F3 | 19.23 c | 74.78 | 86.42 d | 37.38 | 55.67 c | 62.52 | 20.81 b | 33.74 | 0.31 c | 61.04 |
混合F2 | 13.41 d | 57.12 | 127.44 b | 37.36 | 67.25 b | 42.45 | 23.11 a | 17.39 | 0.37 bc | 40.74 |
混合F3 | 16.73 cd | 82.24 | 93.37 cd | 33.74 | 62.79 bc | 45.30 | 21.23 ab | 23.14 | 0.36 bc | 46.96 |
群体 | SPAD值 | 株高 | 单株穗数 | 剑叶长 | 穗长 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
均值 | CV/% | 均值/cm | CV/% | 均值 | CV/% | 均值/cm | CV/% | 均值/cm | CV/% | |
海S1 | 30.21 c | 9.51 | 81.95 e | 4.05 | 22.82 a | 27.98 | 15.98 d | 11.90 | 19.35 c | 7.02 |
HH11 | 32.73 b | 6.77 | 113.00 a | 5.74 | 9.58 c | 30.48 | 23.52 a | 9.59 | 23.96 a | 6.16 |
F2 | 31.40 c | 9.39 | 94.51 d | 8.38 | 11.69 b | 45.04 | 20.32 c | 14.29 | 22.82 b | 6.14 |
F3 | 31.83 bc | 10.67 | 107.25 b | 11.17 | 7.60 cd | 52.59 | 20.43 c | 15.61 | 24.76 a | 13.63 |
混合F2 | 34.06 a | 8.43 | 106.68 b | 13.49 | 6.36 d | 55.75 | 22.14 b | 18.72 | 24.32 a | 16.49 |
混合F3 | 34.71 a | 8.69 | 99.74 c | 11.15 | 12.60 b | 47.21 | 21.23 bc | 16.68 | 22.64 b | 12.32 |
群体 | 不育株率 | 穗粒数 | 结实率 | 千粒重 | 收获指数 | |||||
均值/% | CV/% | 均值 | CV/% | 均值/% | CV/% | 均值/g | CV/% | 均值 | CV/% | |
海S1 | 100.00 a | 0 | 78.28 d | 15.51 | 0.64 c | 65.32 | 19.65 b | 22.09 | 0 c | 0 |
HH11 | 0 e | 0 | 146.49 a | 31.87 | 74.84 a | 10.13 | 19.96 b | 8.50 | 00.50 a | 13.84 |
F2 | 22.91 b | 63.27 | 113.31 b | 21.87 | 58.74 b | 61.01 | 22.66 ab | 12.95 | 00.37 b | 61.41 |
F3 | 10.12 d | 76.99 | 126.86 b | 31.90 | 65.92 ab | 52.40 | 22.38 ab | 23.68 | 00.36 b | 52.65 |
混合F2 | 13.41 cd | 57.12 | 127.44 b | 37.36 | 67.25 ab | 42.45 | 23.11 a | 17.39 | 00.37 b | 40.74 |
混合F3 | 16.73 c | 82.24 | 93.37 c | 33.74 | 62.79 b | 45.30 | 21.23 b | 23.14 | 00.36 b | 46.96 |
Table 2 Comparison of agronomic traits among different generations of rice hybrid Hai S1/HH11 population and mixed population
群体 | SPAD值 | 株高 | 单株穗数 | 剑叶长 | 穗长 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
均值 | CV/% | 均值/cm | CV/% | 均值 | CV/% | 均值/cm | CV/% | 均值/cm | CV/% | |
海S1 | 30.21 c | 9.51 | 81.95 e | 4.05 | 22.82 a | 27.98 | 15.98 d | 11.90 | 19.35 c | 7.02 |
HH11 | 32.73 b | 6.77 | 113.00 a | 5.74 | 9.58 c | 30.48 | 23.52 a | 9.59 | 23.96 a | 6.16 |
F2 | 31.40 c | 9.39 | 94.51 d | 8.38 | 11.69 b | 45.04 | 20.32 c | 14.29 | 22.82 b | 6.14 |
F3 | 31.83 bc | 10.67 | 107.25 b | 11.17 | 7.60 cd | 52.59 | 20.43 c | 15.61 | 24.76 a | 13.63 |
混合F2 | 34.06 a | 8.43 | 106.68 b | 13.49 | 6.36 d | 55.75 | 22.14 b | 18.72 | 24.32 a | 16.49 |
混合F3 | 34.71 a | 8.69 | 99.74 c | 11.15 | 12.60 b | 47.21 | 21.23 bc | 16.68 | 22.64 b | 12.32 |
群体 | 不育株率 | 穗粒数 | 结实率 | 千粒重 | 收获指数 | |||||
均值/% | CV/% | 均值 | CV/% | 均值/% | CV/% | 均值/g | CV/% | 均值 | CV/% | |
海S1 | 100.00 a | 0 | 78.28 d | 15.51 | 0.64 c | 65.32 | 19.65 b | 22.09 | 0 c | 0 |
HH11 | 0 e | 0 | 146.49 a | 31.87 | 74.84 a | 10.13 | 19.96 b | 8.50 | 00.50 a | 13.84 |
F2 | 22.91 b | 63.27 | 113.31 b | 21.87 | 58.74 b | 61.01 | 22.66 ab | 12.95 | 00.37 b | 61.41 |
F3 | 10.12 d | 76.99 | 126.86 b | 31.90 | 65.92 ab | 52.40 | 22.38 ab | 23.68 | 00.36 b | 52.65 |
混合F2 | 13.41 cd | 57.12 | 127.44 b | 37.36 | 67.25 ab | 42.45 | 23.11 a | 17.39 | 00.37 b | 40.74 |
混合F3 | 16.73 c | 82.24 | 93.37 c | 33.74 | 62.79 b | 45.30 | 21.23 b | 23.14 | 00.36 b | 46.96 |
群体 | SPAD值 | 株高 | 单株穗数 | 剑叶长 | 穗长 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
均值 | CV/% | 均值/cm | CV/% | 均值 | CV/% | 均值/cm | CV/% | 均值/cm | CV/% | |
海S1 | 30.21 c | 9.51 | 81.95 d | 4.05 | 22.82 a | 27.98 | 15.98 c | 11.90 | 19.35 d | 7.02 |
振红 | 33.69 ab | 9.40 | 124.93 a | 6.15 | 5.56 c | 27.82 | 27.33 a | 13.66 | 29.55 a | 5.99 |
F2 | 33.88 ab | 13.65 | 104.16 b | 7.25 | 10.89 b | 34.15 | 21.73 b | 13.88 | 24.33 b | 7.34 |
F3 | 32.94 b | 10.07 | 105.71 b | 9.51 | 11.80 b | 36.34 | 21.94 b | 14.95 | 25.27 b | 10.65 |
混合F2 | 34.06 ab | 8.43 | 106.68 b | 13.49 | 6.36 c | 55.75 | 22.14 b | 18.72 | 24.32 b | 16.49 |
混合F3 | 34.71 a | 8.69 | 99.74 c | 11.15 | 12.60 b | 47.21 | 21.23 b | 16.68 | 22.64 c | 12.32 |
群体 | 不育株率 | 穗粒数 | 结实率 | 千粒重 | 收获指数 | |||||
均值/% | CV/% | 均值 | CV/% | 均值/% | CV/% | 均值/g | CV/% | 均值 | CV/% | |
海S1 | 100.00 a | 0 | 78.28 e | 15.51 | 0.64 c | 65.32 | 19.65 b | 22.09 | 0 c | 0 |
振红 | 0 d | 0 | 210.62 a | 18.45 | 79.92 a | 8.62 | 23.24 a | 4.78 | 0.43 a | 15.13 |
F2 | 18.67 b | 65.23 | 116.37 bc | 18.39 | 64.17 b | 59.66 | 22.23 ab | 25.89 | 0.35 b | 59.36 |
F3 | 15.98 bc | 80.66 | 110.53 c | 39.23 | 68.87 b | 40.01 | 22.93 ab | 20.83 | 0.39 ab | 38.60 |
混合F2 | 13.41 c | 57.12 | 127.44 b | 37.36 | 67.25 b | 42.45 | 23.11 a | 17.39 | 0.37 ab | 40.74 |
混合F3 | 16.73 bc | 82.24 | 93.37 d | 33.74 | 62.79 b | 45.30 | 21.23 b | 23.14 | 0.36 b | 46.96 |
Table 3 Comparison of agronomic traits among different generations of rice hybrid Hai S1/Zhenhong population and mixed population
群体 | SPAD值 | 株高 | 单株穗数 | 剑叶长 | 穗长 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
均值 | CV/% | 均值/cm | CV/% | 均值 | CV/% | 均值/cm | CV/% | 均值/cm | CV/% | |
海S1 | 30.21 c | 9.51 | 81.95 d | 4.05 | 22.82 a | 27.98 | 15.98 c | 11.90 | 19.35 d | 7.02 |
振红 | 33.69 ab | 9.40 | 124.93 a | 6.15 | 5.56 c | 27.82 | 27.33 a | 13.66 | 29.55 a | 5.99 |
F2 | 33.88 ab | 13.65 | 104.16 b | 7.25 | 10.89 b | 34.15 | 21.73 b | 13.88 | 24.33 b | 7.34 |
F3 | 32.94 b | 10.07 | 105.71 b | 9.51 | 11.80 b | 36.34 | 21.94 b | 14.95 | 25.27 b | 10.65 |
混合F2 | 34.06 ab | 8.43 | 106.68 b | 13.49 | 6.36 c | 55.75 | 22.14 b | 18.72 | 24.32 b | 16.49 |
混合F3 | 34.71 a | 8.69 | 99.74 c | 11.15 | 12.60 b | 47.21 | 21.23 b | 16.68 | 22.64 c | 12.32 |
群体 | 不育株率 | 穗粒数 | 结实率 | 千粒重 | 收获指数 | |||||
均值/% | CV/% | 均值 | CV/% | 均值/% | CV/% | 均值/g | CV/% | 均值 | CV/% | |
海S1 | 100.00 a | 0 | 78.28 e | 15.51 | 0.64 c | 65.32 | 19.65 b | 22.09 | 0 c | 0 |
振红 | 0 d | 0 | 210.62 a | 18.45 | 79.92 a | 8.62 | 23.24 a | 4.78 | 0.43 a | 15.13 |
F2 | 18.67 b | 65.23 | 116.37 bc | 18.39 | 64.17 b | 59.66 | 22.23 ab | 25.89 | 0.35 b | 59.36 |
F3 | 15.98 bc | 80.66 | 110.53 c | 39.23 | 68.87 b | 40.01 | 22.93 ab | 20.83 | 0.39 ab | 38.60 |
混合F2 | 13.41 c | 57.12 | 127.44 b | 37.36 | 67.25 b | 42.45 | 23.11 a | 17.39 | 0.37 ab | 40.74 |
混合F3 | 16.73 bc | 82.24 | 93.37 d | 33.74 | 62.79 b | 45.30 | 21.23 b | 23.14 | 0.36 b | 46.96 |
群体 | SPAD值 | 株高 | 单株穗数 | 剑叶长 | 穗长 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
均值 | CV/% | 均值/cm | CV/% | 均值 | CV/% | 均值/cm | CV/% | 均值/cm | CV/% | |||
海S1 | 30.21 c | 9.51 | 81.95 e | 4.05 | 22.82 a | 27.98 | 15.98 d | 11.90 | 19.35 e | 7.02 | ||
JX99 | 33.30 b | 10.54 | 121.83 b | 5.73 | 5.89 c | 38.18 | 26.07 a | 14.73 | 28.42 b | 7.72 | ||
F2 | 32.79 b | 8.56 | 130.23 a | 6.82 | 5.76 c | 32.75 | 25.34 a | 13.91 | 29.66 a | 6.43 | ||
F3 | 33.35 b | 13.12 | 127.77 a | 4.90 | 5.67 c | 33.01 | 23.86 b | 12.08 | 29.18 ab | 6.50 | ||
混合F2 | 34.06 ab | 8.43 | 106.68 c | 13.49 | 6.36 c | 55.75 | 22.14 c | 18.72 | 24.32 c | 16.49 | ||
混合F3 | 34.71 a | 8.69 | 99.74 d | 11.15 | 12.60 b | 47.21 | 21.23 c | 16.68 | 22.64 d | 12.32 | ||
群体 | 不育株率 | 穗粒数 | 结实率 | 千粒重 | 收获指数 | |||||||
均值/% | CV/% | 均值 | CV/% | 均值/% | CV/% | 均值/g | CV/% | 均值 | CV/% | |||
海S1 | 100.00 a | 0 | 78.28 d | 15.51 | 0.64 c | 65.32 | 19.65 d | 22.09 | 0 c | 0 | ||
JX99 | 0 c | 0 | 178.87 b | 20.33 | 83.34 a | 7.97 | 23.93 ab | 6.35 | 0.43 a | 15.54 | ||
F2 | 13.21 b | 85.69 | 208.13 a | 22.65 | 79.17 a | 7.35 | 23.27 ab | 4.94 | 0.43 a | 15.76 | ||
F3 | 15.44 b | 76.49 | 184.10 b | 31.78 | 83.46 a | 9.34 | 24.59 a | 4.41 | 0.42 a | 14.94 | ||
混合F2 | 13.41 b | 57.12 | 127.44 c | 37.36 | 67.25 b | 42.45 | 23.11 b | 17.39 | 0.37 b | 40.74 | ||
混合F3 | 16.73 b | 82.24 | 93.37 d | 33.74 | 62.79 b | 45.30 | 21.23 c | 23.14 | 0.36 b | 46.96 |
Table 4 Comparison of agronomic traits among different generations of rice hybrid Hai S1/JX99 population and mixed population
群体 | SPAD值 | 株高 | 单株穗数 | 剑叶长 | 穗长 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
均值 | CV/% | 均值/cm | CV/% | 均值 | CV/% | 均值/cm | CV/% | 均值/cm | CV/% | |||
海S1 | 30.21 c | 9.51 | 81.95 e | 4.05 | 22.82 a | 27.98 | 15.98 d | 11.90 | 19.35 e | 7.02 | ||
JX99 | 33.30 b | 10.54 | 121.83 b | 5.73 | 5.89 c | 38.18 | 26.07 a | 14.73 | 28.42 b | 7.72 | ||
F2 | 32.79 b | 8.56 | 130.23 a | 6.82 | 5.76 c | 32.75 | 25.34 a | 13.91 | 29.66 a | 6.43 | ||
F3 | 33.35 b | 13.12 | 127.77 a | 4.90 | 5.67 c | 33.01 | 23.86 b | 12.08 | 29.18 ab | 6.50 | ||
混合F2 | 34.06 ab | 8.43 | 106.68 c | 13.49 | 6.36 c | 55.75 | 22.14 c | 18.72 | 24.32 c | 16.49 | ||
混合F3 | 34.71 a | 8.69 | 99.74 d | 11.15 | 12.60 b | 47.21 | 21.23 c | 16.68 | 22.64 d | 12.32 | ||
群体 | 不育株率 | 穗粒数 | 结实率 | 千粒重 | 收获指数 | |||||||
均值/% | CV/% | 均值 | CV/% | 均值/% | CV/% | 均值/g | CV/% | 均值 | CV/% | |||
海S1 | 100.00 a | 0 | 78.28 d | 15.51 | 0.64 c | 65.32 | 19.65 d | 22.09 | 0 c | 0 | ||
JX99 | 0 c | 0 | 178.87 b | 20.33 | 83.34 a | 7.97 | 23.93 ab | 6.35 | 0.43 a | 15.54 | ||
F2 | 13.21 b | 85.69 | 208.13 a | 22.65 | 79.17 a | 7.35 | 23.27 ab | 4.94 | 0.43 a | 15.76 | ||
F3 | 15.44 b | 76.49 | 184.10 b | 31.78 | 83.46 a | 9.34 | 24.59 a | 4.41 | 0.42 a | 14.94 | ||
混合F2 | 13.41 b | 57.12 | 127.44 c | 37.36 | 67.25 b | 42.45 | 23.11 b | 17.39 | 0.37 b | 40.74 | ||
混合F3 | 16.73 b | 82.24 | 93.37 d | 33.74 | 62.79 b | 45.30 | 21.23 c | 23.14 | 0.36 b | 46.96 |
[1] | 杨纪珂. 水稻群体育种法的数量遗传理论根据[J]. 遗传, 1980, 2(4): 38-42. |
[2] | 黄耀祥. 水稻杂交育种“组群筛选法”之研究[J]. 广东农业科学, 1980, 7(1): 5-13. |
[3] | 陈金灿, 陈顺佳, 黄耀祥. 组群筛选法的育种效应: “双桂一号”的育成[J]. 广东农业科学, 1983, 10(3): 4-5, 3. |
[4] | 黄耀祥. 水稻生态育种新发展: 两源并举组群筛选超优势稻的选育研究[J]. 广东农业科学, 2003, 30(3):2-6. |
[5] | 梁青, 陈伟雄, 刘峰, 等. 改良组群筛选法在优质稻育种上的应用[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2017, 45(8):21-23. |
[6] | 梁青, 陈伟雄, 王秋燕, 等. 大穗型优质高产水稻新品种广源占5号的选育[J]. 广东农业科学, 2009, 36(7): 21-22. |
[7] | 陈雪瑜, 陈伟雄, 王秋燕, 等. 水稻新品种广丰香8号的选育及栽培技术[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2009(10):103-104. |
[8] | 陈伟雄, 陈雪瑜, 王秋燕, 等. 特优质水稻新品种粳丝粘1号的选育[J]. 中国农业信息, 2009(8):30-31. |
[9] | 梁青, 刘峰, 陈伟雄, 等. 优质稻新品种广源占15号的选育及栽培技术要点[J]. 中国稻米, 2016, 22(4):97-98. |
[10] | 李继开. 试论水稻群体育种[J]. 盐碱地利用, 1985, 15(1):35-40. |
[11] | 李继开, 李振宇, 王志兴, 等. 水稻群体育种理论与实践[J]. 垦殖与稻作, 2004, 34(1):3-5. |
[12] | 李继开, 李振宇, 郭文强, 等. 粳型水稻光敏核不育系GB028S的选育[J]. 杂交水稻, 1997, 12(4): 4-6. |
[13] | 李继开, 李振宇. 盐丰47选育技术报告[J]. 作物研究, 2007, 21(3): 277-279. |
[14] | 王素玲, 李珣, 李继开. 水稻新品种辽河5号选育技术报告[J]. 北方水稻, 2009, 39(1):63-64,66. |
[15] | 李宗鎏, 陈红弟, 李肖玉, 等. 利用光(温)敏核不育系开展水稻常规品种的选育[J]. 广东农业科学, 2000, 27(3):2-4. |
[16] | 李宗鎏, 李肖玉, 陈红弟, 等. 穗科占831的选育及栽培技术[J]. 广东农业科学, 1999, 26(2):4-5. |
[17] | 李宗鎏, 李肖玉, 陈红弟. 穗科占981的选育及应用[J]. 广东农业科学, 2001, 28(3):9-10. |
[18] | 雷建勋, 李泽炳, 万经猛, 等. 利用光敏核不育性进行水稻轮回选择育种新方法的研究[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 1990, 9(4): 491-493. |
[19] | 雷建勋, 李泽炳, 万经猛, 等. 利用光敏核不育性进行水稻轮回选择育种的初步研究[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 1996, 15(2): 110-116. |
[20] | 罗良清, 魏和清. 统计学[M]. 北京: 中国财政经济出版社,2011:49. |
[21] | 杨德卫, 张海峰, 余文权. 我国水稻种质资源创新研究与利用进展[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2024, 25(4):855-868. |
[22] | 管俊娇, 张建华, 奎丽梅, 等. 籼型水稻两用核不育系遗传多样性与抗性品质基因分析[J]. 中国种业, 2024(2):57-62,67. |
[23] | 杨远柱, 王凯, 符辰建, 等. 中国水稻商业化育种成就与展望[J]. 中国稻米, 2021, 27(4):35-44. |
[24] | 武晶, 黎裕. 基于作物种质资源的优异等位基因挖掘:进展与展望[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2019, 20(6):1380-1389. |
[25] | 瞿华香, 张玉烛, 张岳平, 等. 不同栽培模式对水稻产量及农艺性状的影响[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2009(5):27-30. |
[26] | 李春寿, 叶胜海, 陈炎忠, 等. 高产粳稻品种的产量构成因素分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2005, 17(4):177-181. |
[27] | SELLAMUTHU R, LIU G F, RANGANATHAN C B, et al. Genetic analysis and validation of quantitative trait loci associated with reproductive-growth traits and grain yield under drought stress in a doubled haploid line population of rice (Oryza sativa L.)[J]. Field Crops Research, 2011, 124(1):46-58. |
[28] | 谢志梅, 张少红, 肖应辉, 等. 水稻收获指数分子遗传研究进展[J]. 广东农业科学, 2015, 42(15):1-6. |
[29] | 全成哲, 李淑芳, 李鹤南, 等. 吉林省73份审定水稻品种的表型性状遗传多样性研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2024(3):64-75. |
[30] | 李继开, 王素玲, 李珣, 等. 21世纪水稻产量大突破的战略构想[J]. 北方水稻, 2017, 47(6):41-46. |
[31] | 吕文彦, 曹萍, 曹炳晨, 等. 水稻香糯新品种沈农香糯1号选育报告[J]. 辽宁农业科学, 1997(4):53-55. |
[32] | 李琦, 李珣, 李继开. 辽宁水稻育种方法的三次重大突破[J]. 北方水稻, 2010, 40(1):71-74. |
[33] | 陈代喜. 杉木遗传测定的研究[J]. 广西林业科学, 1994, 23(2): 65-71. |
[34] | 欧光道, 伏军, 荣冶粗. 群体双亲选育超级稻的设想与研究进展[J]. 种子, 2001, 20(1): 61-62. |
[35] | 刘君, 蔡泉, 付连双, 等. 春小麦多父本杂交对F3影响的研究[J]. 东北农业大学学报, 2004, 35(6):680-684. |
[36] | 李春萍, 邱轶辉, 夏厚胤, 等. 紫花苜蓿多父本F1代低蒸腾及产量性状的隶属函数分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1416-1422. |
[37] | 田大成. 水稻异交栽培学:杂交水稻高产制种原理与技术[M]. 成都: 四川科学技术出版社,1991. |
[38] | 朱英国. 水稻雄性不育生物学[M]. 武汉: 武汉大学出版社, 2000. |
[39] | 常志远, 涂英文. 水稻开花授粉习性探讨[J]. 江西农业学报, 1989, 1(2):1-7. |
[40] | 田大成, 黄三奎, 段永国, 等. 水稻不育系花时和受粉时间与异交结实率的关系[J]. 杂交水稻, 2004, 19(3): 50-54. |
[41] | 谢留杰, 段敏, 曾国应, 等. 8个籼型两用核不育系育性及开花习性研究[J]. 杂交水稻, 2016, 31(6):32-35,41. |
[42] | 丁获蛟, 蔡壮夫. 水稻发育特性与制种花期相遇的关系[J]. 杂交水稻, 2001, 16(1): 12-14. |
[43] | 黄帮超, 陶有凤, 秦琴, 等. 机插杂交稻制种异交结实特性研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(20):3960-3974. |
[44] | 石明松. 对光照长度敏感的隐性雄性不育水稻的发现与初步研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 1985, 18(2):44-48. |
[45] | 李继开, 王素玲, 朱德文. 水稻群体育种的技术集成[J]. 北方水稻, 2011, 41(4):78-80. |
[1] | CHEN Yupei, SHAN Yingjie, LU Ruohui, ZHU Weifeng, KONG Haimin. Interpretation of local standard “Fertilization requirement of rice, wheat and rape in different regions” of Zhejing Province [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(4): 801-804. |
[2] | ZHOU Hui, LIN Zhenpeng, ZHOU Haiping, WANG Chengbao, XU Xiuru, ZHONG Linping, MA Guohua. Detection and analysis of resistance/susceptibility genes of rice blast and bacterial blight in 23 core rice materials [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(4): 813-818. |
[3] | FAN Dejia, CHEN Shiqiang, HE Zhentian, ZHANG Rong, WANG Ruqin, CHENG Menghao, WANG Jianhua. Character analysis of rice varieties approved through different test channels in Jiangsu Province [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(4): 819-825. |
[4] | LI Kun, LIU Zhonglai, CAO Guojun, PAN Shiwen, YU Xuan, ZHANG Yiyue, WANG Zhiquan. Study on productivity of 4 conventional japonica rice varieties in northern Jiangxi Province [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(4): 826-829. |
[5] | ZHANG Xinyue, YE Shenghai, DONG Junjie, FU Haowei, LI Youfa. Breeding of new indica-japonica hybrid rice combination Zhejingjiayou 710 with high yield and good quality [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(4): 830-833. |
[6] | ZHANG Chengxiang, LI Bai, LU Jingen, GAO Rongcun. Breeding of a new high-quality and disease-resistant three-line hybrid japonica rice variety Jiayou 10 [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(4): 834-837. |
[7] | QI Yongbin, WANG Linyou, LYU Xiangchao, JIANG Genshui, ZHANG Haodi. Breeding, characteristics and cultivation techniques of a new high yield and long-grain indica and japonica hybrid rice variety Zheyou 77 [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(4): 838-842. |
[8] | WANG Wei, QI Yongbin, WANG Junmin, XIAO Changming, LI Kekuan, LIU Chaogang, LIU Qinglong. Breeding and application of round grain specialized two-line early indica rice restorer line Fu 269 [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(4): 843-847. |
[9] | QIAN Yanjie, LI Cheng, YAO Yanhong, HU Mingyong, WANG Wei, JIANG Yu, LUO Wei, XIAO Feifei, WANG Shaoxi. Selection experiment of high-yield regenerated rice varieties suitable for Changsha Region [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(4): 848-853. |
[10] | TAO Ruofu, XIA Ruda. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer reduction combined with foliar silicon fertilizer on agronomic traits and yield of Huazheyou 261 [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(4): 854-857. |
[11] | LIU Guoqun, ZHU Chunquan, LIU Xiaoxia, LI Ronghui, YAN Wenting, SUN Xiuhua, SHANG Xiaolan, ZHU Lianfeng, TIAN Wenhao, ZHANG Junhua. Effects of different new fertilizer application on yield and quality of rice [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(4): 858-862. |
[12] | CHEN Yixiang, ZHANG Xiaomei, GOU Yuhong, XIA Zaixing, GUO Tao, ZHANG Bisheng. Evaluation of disease resistance and high yield of different fresh waxy maize varieties [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(4): 879-884. |
[13] | LUO Qin, YAO Xiaoming, SHOU Menghui, ZHOU Yujie. Evaluation of different adjuvants on the control effect of rice diseases and insect pests by spraying drone [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(4): 986-991. |
[14] | SHI Lingli, WANG Yin. Study on the benefit-sharing model of utilizing brittle culm rice to promote the development of the mountain spring water fish farming system in Kaihua of Zhejiang [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(3): 546-550. |
[15] | CAI Daming, LU Xin, LI Penghao, WANG Weiping, ZHOU Zhiguo, HONG Chunlai. Effects of perishable waste organic fertilizer application on rice growth and soil physicochemical properties [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(3): 566-571. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||