
Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2026, Vol. 67 ›› Issue (10): 2409-2414.DOI: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20250549
Previous Articles Next Articles
YANG Shengnan1(
), LI Guiyong1, ZHANG Jianbo2, LIU Jiahao1, LUO Yue1, CHEN Zhong3, TENG Jiusheng4, HAN Xuekun1(
)
Received:2025-08-01
Online:2026-10-11
Published:2026-10-19
Contact:
HAN Xuekun
CLC Number:
YANG Shengnan, LI Guiyong, ZHANG Jianbo, LIU Jiahao, LUO Yue, CHEN Zhong, TENG Jiusheng, HAN Xuekun. Quality changes of Yangguang 1 citrus under room temperature and low temperature storage conditions[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(10): 2409-2414.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnykx.cn/EN/10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20250549
| 贮藏时间/d | 单果重/g | 果实横径/mm | 果实纵径/mm | 果形指数 | 果皮重/g | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 室温 | 低温 | 室温 | 低温 | 室温 | 低温 | 室温 | 低温 | 室温 | 低温 | |
| 0 | 166.34±16.52 | 170.97±13.50 | 69.04±2.33 | 70.07±0.98 | 60.74±2.02 | 60.67±3.75 | 0.88±0.01 | 0.87±0.04 | 24.44±2.92 | 26.39±3.73 |
| 30 | 163.85±13.47 | 161.79±15.43 | 68.59±2.00 | 68.19±2.20 | 60.80±2.97 | 61.59±2.33 | 0.89±0.04 | 0.90±0.04 | 27.65±3.52 | 29.36±4.72 |
| 60 | 150.27±18.91 | 155.15±13.76 | 66.76±3.79 | 68.06±2.31 | 57.95±3.39 | 60.62±3.05 | 0.87±0.04 | 0.89±0.04 | 24.94±5.05 | 30.52±3.10* |
| 90 | 148.92±12.86 | 153.06±14.42 | 66.60±1.79 | 67.52±2.30 | 58.12±2.17 | 60.06±2.21 | 0.87±0.03 | 0.89±0.02 | 24.54±2.79 | 28.01±4.79 |
| 120 | 132.39±2.75 | 150.79±4.84** | 63.35±1.55 | 66.50±1.31** | 53.95±2.91 | 58.65±1.90** | 0.85±0.05 | 0.88±0.03 | 21.67±2.75 | 26.69±4.84* |
| 贮藏时间/d | 果皮厚度/mm | 色差指数 | L* | a* | b* | |||||
| 室温 | 低温 | 室温 | 低温 | 室温 | 低温 | 室温 | 低温 | 室温 | 低温 | |
| 0 | 2.03±0.35 | 1.88±0.25 | 3.47±0.41 | 3.38±1.02 | 70.84±0.81 | 71.60±2.86 | 17.24±2.37 | 17.06±4.68 | 70.06±2.28 | 71.23±1.45 |
| 30 | 2.03±0.31 | 2.17±0.53 | 3.89±0.41 | 4.25±0.87 | 70.14±0.81 | 69.67±2.06 | 19.23±1.65 | 19.86±3.32 | 70.61±1.68 | 67.52±2.24* |
| 60 | 1.90±0.28 | 2.49±0.44** | 4.52±0.98 | 4.24±0.97 | 69.60±2.04 | 69.80±2.33 | 21.99±3.95 | 20.67±4.10 | 70.52±2.57 | 70.22±1.57 |
| 90 | 1.86±0.24 | 2.41±0.34** | 5.16±0.89 | 4.88±0.69 | 67.84±1.58 | 68.44±1.46 | 24.12±3.75 | 22.68±2.89 | 69.21±1.19 | 68.07±1.19 |
| 120 | 1.67±0.32 | 2.10±0.44* | 5.55±0.97 | 6.05±2.41 | 66.83±1.89 | 66.02±6.26 | 25.52±3.46 | 26.94±6.42 | 69.35±2.33 | 69.80±2.34 |
Table 1 Appearance quality of Yangguang 1 citrus fruits at different storage temperatures
| 贮藏时间/d | 单果重/g | 果实横径/mm | 果实纵径/mm | 果形指数 | 果皮重/g | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 室温 | 低温 | 室温 | 低温 | 室温 | 低温 | 室温 | 低温 | 室温 | 低温 | |
| 0 | 166.34±16.52 | 170.97±13.50 | 69.04±2.33 | 70.07±0.98 | 60.74±2.02 | 60.67±3.75 | 0.88±0.01 | 0.87±0.04 | 24.44±2.92 | 26.39±3.73 |
| 30 | 163.85±13.47 | 161.79±15.43 | 68.59±2.00 | 68.19±2.20 | 60.80±2.97 | 61.59±2.33 | 0.89±0.04 | 0.90±0.04 | 27.65±3.52 | 29.36±4.72 |
| 60 | 150.27±18.91 | 155.15±13.76 | 66.76±3.79 | 68.06±2.31 | 57.95±3.39 | 60.62±3.05 | 0.87±0.04 | 0.89±0.04 | 24.94±5.05 | 30.52±3.10* |
| 90 | 148.92±12.86 | 153.06±14.42 | 66.60±1.79 | 67.52±2.30 | 58.12±2.17 | 60.06±2.21 | 0.87±0.03 | 0.89±0.02 | 24.54±2.79 | 28.01±4.79 |
| 120 | 132.39±2.75 | 150.79±4.84** | 63.35±1.55 | 66.50±1.31** | 53.95±2.91 | 58.65±1.90** | 0.85±0.05 | 0.88±0.03 | 21.67±2.75 | 26.69±4.84* |
| 贮藏时间/d | 果皮厚度/mm | 色差指数 | L* | a* | b* | |||||
| 室温 | 低温 | 室温 | 低温 | 室温 | 低温 | 室温 | 低温 | 室温 | 低温 | |
| 0 | 2.03±0.35 | 1.88±0.25 | 3.47±0.41 | 3.38±1.02 | 70.84±0.81 | 71.60±2.86 | 17.24±2.37 | 17.06±4.68 | 70.06±2.28 | 71.23±1.45 |
| 30 | 2.03±0.31 | 2.17±0.53 | 3.89±0.41 | 4.25±0.87 | 70.14±0.81 | 69.67±2.06 | 19.23±1.65 | 19.86±3.32 | 70.61±1.68 | 67.52±2.24* |
| 60 | 1.90±0.28 | 2.49±0.44** | 4.52±0.98 | 4.24±0.97 | 69.60±2.04 | 69.80±2.33 | 21.99±3.95 | 20.67±4.10 | 70.52±2.57 | 70.22±1.57 |
| 90 | 1.86±0.24 | 2.41±0.34** | 5.16±0.89 | 4.88±0.69 | 67.84±1.58 | 68.44±1.46 | 24.12±3.75 | 22.68±2.89 | 69.21±1.19 | 68.07±1.19 |
| 120 | 1.67±0.32 | 2.10±0.44* | 5.55±0.97 | 6.05±2.41 | 66.83±1.89 | 66.02±6.26 | 25.52±3.46 | 26.94±6.42 | 69.35±2.33 | 69.80±2.34 |
贮藏 时间/d | 出汁率/% | 可食率/% | 可滴定酸含量/% | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 室温 | 低温 | 室温 | 低温 | 室温 | 低温 | |
| 0 | 36.97±5.59 | 41.61±7.13 | 85.24±1.94 | 84.55±2.10 | 1.05±0.06 | 1.00±0.17 |
| 30 | 47.19±2.24 | 45.34±7.28 | 83.12±1.87 | 81.76±3.14 | 0.74±0.10 | 0.70±0.15 |
| 60 | 50.68±4.32 | 57.61±6.19* | 83.53±1.51 | 80.32±1.09** | 0.65±0.12 | 0.68±0.12 |
| 90 | 45.94±3.45 | 52.03±5.56* | 83.48±1.74 | 81.72±2.52 | 0.52±0.07 | 0.64±0.18 |
| 120 | 50.85±5.65 | 52.06±5.03 | 83.53±2.53 | 82.20±3.73 | 0.44±0.09 | 0.44±0.10 |
贮藏 时间/d | 可溶性固形物含量/% | 糖酸比 | 维生素C含量/(mg?kg-1) | |||
| 室温 | 低温 | 室温 | 低温 | 室温 | 低温 | |
| 0 | 14.65±0.91 | 13.84±1.29 | 14.04±1.23 | 14.11±2.06 | 302.50±29.70 | 276.50±58.40 |
| 30 | 17.12±0.97 | 17.90±1.63 | 23.28±2.33 | 26.39±4.28 | 419.40±42.20 | 390.20±52.80 |
| 60 | 17.19±0.99 | 16.87±1.00 | 27.47±5.52 | 25.25±3.50 | 523.60±97.90 | 447.60±43.30 |
| 90 | 16.51±1.58 | 16.92±1.74 | 32.27±3.39 | 27.98±6.36 | 372.00±70.20 | 350.50±47.40 |
| 120 | 16.60±1.68 | 16.66±2.03 | 39.53±8.43 | 39.12±6.46 | 377.40±34.50 | 303.60±60.80* |
Table 2 Fruit intrinsic quality of Yangguang 1 citrus at different storage temperatures
贮藏 时间/d | 出汁率/% | 可食率/% | 可滴定酸含量/% | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 室温 | 低温 | 室温 | 低温 | 室温 | 低温 | |
| 0 | 36.97±5.59 | 41.61±7.13 | 85.24±1.94 | 84.55±2.10 | 1.05±0.06 | 1.00±0.17 |
| 30 | 47.19±2.24 | 45.34±7.28 | 83.12±1.87 | 81.76±3.14 | 0.74±0.10 | 0.70±0.15 |
| 60 | 50.68±4.32 | 57.61±6.19* | 83.53±1.51 | 80.32±1.09** | 0.65±0.12 | 0.68±0.12 |
| 90 | 45.94±3.45 | 52.03±5.56* | 83.48±1.74 | 81.72±2.52 | 0.52±0.07 | 0.64±0.18 |
| 120 | 50.85±5.65 | 52.06±5.03 | 83.53±2.53 | 82.20±3.73 | 0.44±0.09 | 0.44±0.10 |
贮藏 时间/d | 可溶性固形物含量/% | 糖酸比 | 维生素C含量/(mg?kg-1) | |||
| 室温 | 低温 | 室温 | 低温 | 室温 | 低温 | |
| 0 | 14.65±0.91 | 13.84±1.29 | 14.04±1.23 | 14.11±2.06 | 302.50±29.70 | 276.50±58.40 |
| 30 | 17.12±0.97 | 17.90±1.63 | 23.28±2.33 | 26.39±4.28 | 419.40±42.20 | 390.20±52.80 |
| 60 | 17.19±0.99 | 16.87±1.00 | 27.47±5.52 | 25.25±3.50 | 523.60±97.90 | 447.60±43.30 |
| 90 | 16.51±1.58 | 16.92±1.74 | 32.27±3.39 | 27.98±6.36 | 372.00±70.20 | 350.50±47.40 |
| 120 | 16.60±1.68 | 16.66±2.03 | 39.53±8.43 | 39.12±6.46 | 377.40±34.50 | 303.60±60.80* |
| 指标 | PC1 | PC2 | PC3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 果皮厚度 | 0.11 | 0.41 | -0.18 |
| 单果重 | 0.38 | 0.04 | -0.03 |
| 果皮重 | 0.16 | 0.42 | -0.06 |
| 果形指数 | 0.15 | 0.39 | -0.13 |
| 出汁率 | -0.25 | 0.30 | 0.07 |
| 可食率 | 0.11 | -0.44 | 0.10 |
| 可溶性固形物含量 | -0.22 | 0.32 | 0.26 |
| 可滴定酸含量 | 0.37 | -0.11 | 0.13 |
| 糖酸比 | -0.37 | 0.06 | -0.21 |
| 色差指数 | -0.35 | 0.04 | -0.37 |
| 维生素C含量 | -0.13 | 0.18 | 0.82 |
| 果实横径 | 0.38 | 0.08 | -0.01 |
| 果实纵径 | 0.34 | 0.23 | -0.07 |
| 特征值 | 6.51 | 4.45 | 1.09 |
| 方差贡献率/% | 50.07 | 34.24 | 8.36 |
| 累计方差贡献率/% | 50.07 | 84.31 | 92.67 |
| 方差贡献率权重 | 0.54 | 0.37 | 0.09 |
Table 3 Principal component analysis of fruit quality of Yangguang 1 citrus
| 指标 | PC1 | PC2 | PC3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 果皮厚度 | 0.11 | 0.41 | -0.18 |
| 单果重 | 0.38 | 0.04 | -0.03 |
| 果皮重 | 0.16 | 0.42 | -0.06 |
| 果形指数 | 0.15 | 0.39 | -0.13 |
| 出汁率 | -0.25 | 0.30 | 0.07 |
| 可食率 | 0.11 | -0.44 | 0.10 |
| 可溶性固形物含量 | -0.22 | 0.32 | 0.26 |
| 可滴定酸含量 | 0.37 | -0.11 | 0.13 |
| 糖酸比 | -0.37 | 0.06 | -0.21 |
| 色差指数 | -0.35 | 0.04 | -0.37 |
| 维生素C含量 | -0.13 | 0.18 | 0.82 |
| 果实横径 | 0.38 | 0.08 | -0.01 |
| 果实纵径 | 0.34 | 0.23 | -0.07 |
| 特征值 | 6.51 | 4.45 | 1.09 |
| 方差贡献率/% | 50.07 | 34.24 | 8.36 |
| 累计方差贡献率/% | 50.07 | 84.31 | 92.67 |
| 方差贡献率权重 | 0.54 | 0.37 | 0.09 |
| 处理 | PC1 得分 | PC2 得分 | PC3 得分 | 综合 得分 | 排名 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 低温贮藏60 d | 0.24 | 3.38 | 0.42 | 1.42 | 1 |
| 低温贮藏30 d | 1.09 | 2.22 | 0.04 | 1.41 | 2 |
| 低温贮藏0 d | 3.66 | -2.38 | -0.46 | 1.05 | 3 |
| 室温贮藏0 d | 3.50 | -2.31 | -0.19 | 1.02 | 4 |
| 室温贮藏30 d | 1.26 | 0.69 | 0.87 | 1.01 | 5 |
| 低温贮藏90 d | -0.17 | 1.87 | -0.81 | 0.53 | 6 |
| 室温贮藏60 d | -1.33 | -0.42 | 2.11 | -0.68 | 7 |
| 低温贮藏120 d | -2.10 | 0.67 | -1.86 | -1.05 | 8 |
| 室温贮藏90 d | -1.49 | -1.07 | -0.22 | -1.22 | 9 |
| 室温贮藏120 d | -4.66 | -2.64 | 0.09 | -3.48 | 10 |
Table 4 Comprehensive scores and rankings of fruit quality of Yangguang 1 citrus under different treatments
| 处理 | PC1 得分 | PC2 得分 | PC3 得分 | 综合 得分 | 排名 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 低温贮藏60 d | 0.24 | 3.38 | 0.42 | 1.42 | 1 |
| 低温贮藏30 d | 1.09 | 2.22 | 0.04 | 1.41 | 2 |
| 低温贮藏0 d | 3.66 | -2.38 | -0.46 | 1.05 | 3 |
| 室温贮藏0 d | 3.50 | -2.31 | -0.19 | 1.02 | 4 |
| 室温贮藏30 d | 1.26 | 0.69 | 0.87 | 1.01 | 5 |
| 低温贮藏90 d | -0.17 | 1.87 | -0.81 | 0.53 | 6 |
| 室温贮藏60 d | -1.33 | -0.42 | 2.11 | -0.68 | 7 |
| 低温贮藏120 d | -2.10 | 0.67 | -1.86 | -1.05 | 8 |
| 室温贮藏90 d | -1.49 | -1.07 | -0.22 | -1.22 | 9 |
| 室温贮藏120 d | -4.66 | -2.64 | 0.09 | -3.48 | 10 |
| [1] | 张文龙,万润楚,郑妮,等. 柑橘不育系新品种阳光1号[J]. 园艺学报,2024,51(9):2221-2222. |
| [2] | 苏卿,周志钦. 采后因素对果蔬产品营养和质量安全的影响研究现状[J]. 食品工业科技,2012,33(19):362-369. |
| [3] | 孙立方,柯甫志,孙建华,等. 杂柑媛小春果实的贮藏特性及生理性状变化研究[J]. 浙江农业科学,2023,64(5):1195-1198. |
| [4] | 李果果,欧智涛,陈东奎,等. 沃柑低温环境贮藏的品质变化分析[J]. 江苏农业科学,2019,47(17):219-221. |
| [5] | Sun Y, Li Y Y, Xu Y,et al. The effects of storage temperature,light illumination,and low-temperature plasma on fruit rot and change in quality of postharvest Gannan navel oranges[J]. Foods,2022,11(22):3707. |
| [6] | 何义仲,陈兆星,刘润生,等. 不同贮藏方式对赣南纽荷尔脐橙果实品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学,2014,47(4):736-748. |
| [7] | Guo X M, Luo T, Han D M,et al. Analysis of metabolomics associated with quality differences between room-temperature- and low-temperature-stored Litchi chinensis [J]. Food Science & Nutrition,2019,7(11):3560-3569. |
| [8] | 刘萍,刘晓凤,林子桢,等. 贮藏温度和采收期对沙糖橘贮藏品质的影响[J]. 西南农业学报,2025,38(1):72-85. |
| [9] | 刘萍,刘晓凤,林子桢,等. 贮藏温度和采收期对W.默科特柑橘贮藏品质的影响[J]. 果树学报,2024,41(8):1649-1664. |
| [10] | Deng W J, Wu J L, Da Y R,et al. Effect of temperature treatment on fruit quality and immunoregulation of Satsuma(Citrus unshiu Marc.)during storage[J]. Food Science & Nutrition,2020,8(10):5443-5451. |
| [11] | 勾邦睿. 完熟栽培温州蜜柑果实适宜采收期与贮藏温度研究[D]. 杭州:浙江大学,2021. |
| [12] | 李文广,赖恒鑫,彭良志,等. 云南沃柑二次开花的果实品质分析[J]. 果树学报,2022,39(2):184-192. |
| [13] | 娄伟,李梦媛,柳嘉程,等. 不同硒源强化对赣南脐橙鲜样硒含量及贮藏果品质的影响[J]. 中国南方果树,2024,53(S1):32-37. |
| [14] | 荆佳伊,刘晓佳,邓丽莉,等. 采收成熟度对晚熟W.默科特柑橘贮藏期品质的影响[J]. 农业工程学报,2021,37(5):303-309. |
| [15] | 郭静,金燕,廖满余,等. 湖南省主栽柑橘品质及贮藏性的比较[J]. 食品研究与开发,2023,44(14):20-29. |
| [16] | 奚昕琰,杨淑娜,王颖,等. 采收期和贮藏时间对红美人杂柑果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学,2021,62(3):538-540. |
| [17] | Kang C, Cao J P, Sun J,et al. Comparison of physiochemical characteristics of Citrus reticulata cv. Shatangju fruit with different fruit sizes after storage[J]. Food Packaging and Shelf Life,2022,31:100774. |
| [18] | Lin X, Wei Q J, Zeng L C,et al. Osmolytes and CsAQP expression jointly influence water physiology in the peel and pulp of orange(Citrus sinensis(L.)Osbeck)fruit during postharvest water loss[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science,2024,15:1475574. |
| [19] | Ding Y D, Chang J W, Ma Q L,et al. Network analysis of postharvest senescence process in citrus fruits revealed by transcriptomic and metabolomic profiling[J]. Plant Physiology,2015,168(1):357-376. |
| [20] | 李保祥,余易琳,何悦,等. 壳聚糖-纳米纤维素复合涂膜对砂糖橘贮藏保鲜效果的影响[J]. 食品科学,2021,42(13):185-192. |
| [21] | Ge X X, Cao T T, Yi L H,et al. Low and high storage temperature inhibited the coloration of Mandarin fruit(Citrus unshiu Marc.)with different mechanism[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,2022,102(15):6930-6941. |
| [22] | Aispuro-Hernández E, Vera-Guzmán A M, Vargas-Arispuro I,et al. Low-temperature storage regulates the expression of genes related to peel pigments of grapefruit[J]. Scientia Horticulturae,2019,254:208-214. |
| [23] | 魏雅君,杨力,马惠玲. 预处理对增加红富士苹果细胞壁物质降解和出汁率的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业,2011,37(11):75-80. |
| [24] | 于乐谦,杨力,马惠玲,等. 2种预处理方法对秦冠苹果果实细胞壁物质降解和出汁率的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2012,40(11):159-164. |
| [25] | Xiong B, Han L L, Ou Y H,et al. Effects of different postharvest treatments on fruit quality,sucrose metabolism,and antioxidant capacity of Newhall navel oranges during storage[J]. Plants,2025,14(5):802. |
| [26] | Yu J W, Tseng Y, Pham K,et al. Starch and sugars as determinants of postharvest shelf life and quality:some new and surprising roles[J]. Current Opinion in Biotechnology,2022,78:102844. |
| [27] | 朱亚猛,谢超,郑炜,等. 臭氧处理协同低压静电场对青见柑橘低温贮藏品质的影响[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报,2022,13(19):6416-6422. |
| [28] | 李文云,罗怿,王小柯,等. 留树贮藏对椪柑果实品质和呼吸强度的影响[J]. 西南农业学报,2024,37(3):568-576. |
| [29] | 高丽,龙勇,陈德勇,等. 不同采收期和冷藏期对四川清见杂柑品质特性的影响[J]. 现代食品科技,2024,40(9):209-218. |
| [30] | 杨阳,唐宁,李正国,等. 5个晚熟柑橘品种果实发育期品质变化研究[J]. 西南农业学报,2014,27(1):263-267. |
| [31] | Mditshwa A, Magwaza L S, Tesfay S Z,et al. Postharvest factors affecting vitamin C content of citrus fruits:a review[J]. Scientia Horticulturae,2017,218:95-104. |
| [32] | 王海宏,周慧娟,陈召亮,等. 25%咪鲜胺水乳剂对宫川柑橘贮藏期品质及病害的影响[J]. 食品与机械,2010,26(3):44-46. |
| [1] | SUN Li, WANG Rong, ZHANG Shuwen, YU Zheping, ZHANG Yang, QU Jing, ZHANG Qi. Effects of calcium and boron on fruit quality and storage tolerance of Chinese bayberry [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(9): 2163-2167. |
| [2] | YE Xiongfang, CHEN Ke, HE Dongping, RONG Song, XIANG Tao, GU Likai, YU Yongqi, FAN Anli, YANG Zhe, ZHANG Yulong, WANG Huaying. Comparative study of six taste-oriented tomato varieties under greenhouse substrate cultivation [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(9): 2172-2176. |
| [3] | FAN Mingliang, FENG Kongjun, ZHOU Kaile, YANG Shuai, HE Bing, ZHOU Yong, PAN Feiyun, ZHENG Lin, LAN Liyan, FU Ruijie, DAI Fen. Effects of chemical fertilizer replacement by bio-nano-selenium fertilizer on fruit quality of Hongmeiren citrus and soil nutrients [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(9): 2183-2186. |
| [4] | XIAO Huan, XIE Hongjiang, LI Yabing, LIANG Xiao, LEI Fuchen, FENG Shengli, WEI Jie. Effects of amino acid selenium foliar fertilizer on fruit quality and selenium content of Korla fragrant pear [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(7): 1714-1717. |
| [5] | WANG Shulu, YU Zheping, LIANG Senmiao, SUN Li, SONG Yang, QI Xingjiang, ZHANG Shuwen. Effects of integrated water and fertilizer management in protected cultivation on the growth and fruit quality of Myrica rubra [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(6): 1333-1336. |
| [6] | ZHANG Zhixiong, HUANG Jindao, ZHANG Bo, LIANG Senmiao. Effect of spring pruning and foliar nutrition on the fruit setting rate and fruit quality of Myrica rubra [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(6): 1337-1341. |
| [7] | XIE Pu, YAN Shuang, WANG Honglin, ZHENG Qianming. Comprehensive evaluation of fruit quality of five Morella nana samples from Guizhou [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(6): 1342-1348. |
| [8] | LEI Kangqi, YANG Han, WU Yuyong, QI Yetong, ZHANG Lin, YAO Ying, ZHOU Huifen. Effects of two potassium⁃solubilizing bacterial strains on fruit quality of Chinese bayberry [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(6): 1349-1354. |
| [9] | WU Bibo, WANG Rong, XU Qinyi, ZHENG Kebin, WU Jiangxing, QIU Qiangqiang, YE Xiaoming, FAN Shulei. Effects of different mulching methods on microclimate and economic traits of Myrica rubra [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(6): 1355-1359. |
| [10] | NI Xiaojun, LIANG Senmiao. Effects of film partition on yield and fruit quality of mountain bayberry in facility cultivation [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(6): 1360-1365. |
| [11] | ZHANG Jiajia. Effects of different grass types on soil properties and fruit quality in a mountain Myrica rubra orchard [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(6): 1366-1370. |
| [12] | ZHANG Jianbin, WU Yuyong, YING Zhengzheng, SUN Li, ZHANG Shuwen, YANG Han, LI Jiasheng, YU Qiaomei. Effects of Rhodobacter sphaeroides metabolites on growth and fruit quality of Chinese bayberry [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(6): 1371-1377. |
| [13] | PAN Shanxiang, HUANG Jindao, LIANG Senmiao. Effect of the "three adjustments and one unification" technology on yield and fruit quality of high-altitude Myrica rubra [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(6): 1395-1399. |
| [14] | ZHANG Bo, HUANG Jindao, ZHANG Zhixiong, LIANG Senmiao. Effect of tree shape on the growth and fruit quality of Citrus Beni Madonna [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(6): 1507-1510. |
| [15] | JIANG Yuliang, GONG Yao, MIAO Yunchun, WANG Cheng, YUAN Baiyu, ZHANG Lu, ZHAO Yucheng, ZHONG Min. Study on grafting compatibility between rootstock Yezhuang 1 and watermelon variety Jingjia 301 [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(5): 1117-1122. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||