Quality evaluation and correlation analysis of different flavor⁃type tomato varieties in eastern Zhejiang

doi:10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20250470

Abstract

Abstract:

To screen for high-quality flavor-type tomato varieties that align with consumer preferences，this study utilized 11 flavor-type tomato varieties as experimental materials. Key indicators，including fruit appearance traits and nutritional quality，were systematically measured，and a comprehensive evaluation was conducted by combining sensory assessments. The results revealed that there were significant （p<0.05） variations in appearance traits among different varieties，including individual fruit weight，pulp thickness，and hardness. In terms of nutritional quality，Hangza 614 exhibited the highest soluble solids content （8.83%），while Hangza 612 showed the highest sugar-to-acid ratio （10.92）. The sensory evaluation scores highlighted Hangza 614（8.4 points）and Hangza 604（8.3 points）as outstanding performers，with their fruits featuring soft，glutinous flesh and rich flavor profiles. Correlation analysis revealed that sensory scores exhibited positive correlations with the number of ventricles and the sugar-to-acid ratio at p<0.01 and p<0.05 level， respectively， with the correlation coefficient of 0.810 and 0.675， respectively，while showing a highly significantly （p<0.01）negative correlation with pulp thickness（correlation coefficient of -0.889）. In summary，Hangza 614 and Hangza 604 demonstrated excellent overall taste，characterized by a higher number of ventricles，a superior sugar-to-acid ratio，and thinner pulp，making them suitable for promotion and application in eastern Zhejiang.

Key words: flavor-type tomato, nutritional quality, sensory evaluation, sugar-to-acid ratio

CLC Number:

S641.2

LIANG Liwei, CHEN Yingen, XU Weihang, ZHENG Jirong, WANG Hong. Quality evaluation and correlation analysis of different flavor⁃type tomato varieties in eastern Zhejiang[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(5): 1088-1091.

Figures/Tables 4

References 7

[1]	沈年桥，李康宁，卢绍恺，等. 小小番茄果，撬动大产业［J］. 长江蔬菜，2024（8）：7-9.
	SHEN N Q， LI K N， LU S K，et al. Development status and countermeasures of characteristic advantage tomato industry in Cangnan County［J］. Journal of Changjiang Vegetables，2024（8）：7-9.
[2]	张卫红，葛立傲，陈红辉，等. 番茄产业引领振兴之路，全力助推高质量发展：上海金山区番茄研发中心成长纪实［J］. 长江蔬菜，2024（21）：66-68.
	ZHANG W H， GE L A， CHEN H H，et al. Growth documentary of tomato research and development center in Jinshan District of Shanghai［J］. Journal of Changjiang Vegetables，2024（21）：66-68.
[3]	TIEMAN D， ZHU G T， RESENDE M F R Jr，，et al. A chemical genetic roadmap to improved tomato flavor［J］. Science，2017，355（6323）：391-394.
[4]	BALDWIN E A， SCOTT J W， SHEWMAKER C K，et al. Flavor trivia and tomato aroma：biochemistry and possible mechanisms for control of important aroma components［J］. HortScience，2000，35（6）：1013-1022.
[5]	蔡润，孙正梁，胡京昂，等. 不同口感型番茄品种的品质鉴定及多元统计分析［J］. 中国蔬菜，2023（11）：87-97.
	CAI R， SUN Z L， HU J A，et al. Quality identification and multivariate statistical analysis of different palatable tomato varieties［J］. China Vegetables，2023（11）：87-97.
[6]	王丹丹，齐连芬，张庆银，等. 日光温室不同施肥量对番茄果实品质的影响［J］. 河北农业大学学报，2019，42（3）：71-75.
	WANG D D， QI L F， ZHANG Q Y，et al. Determination and comprehensive analysis of tomato fruit quality under different fertilizer amount in solar greenhouse［J］. Journal of Agricultural University of Hebei，2019，42（3）：71-75.
[7]	蔡润. 口感型番茄品种筛选与评价［D］. 杨凌：西北农林科技大学，2024.
	CAI R. Selection and evaluation of palatable tomato varieties［D］. Yangling：Northwest A & F University，2024.

品种	单果重/g	果实横径/mm	果实纵径/mm	果形指数	果肉厚度/mm	硬度/（10⁵Pa）	心室数	果皮颜色	种腔颜色
嘉红100	132.27±14.05 b	63.08±5.06 bc	46.50±2.14 cd	0.74±0.03 d	6.66±0.82 a	7.50±0.50 bc	4.67±0.58 e	红	红
杭杂106	89.92±5.55 cd	50.38±4.54 e	48.16±2.84 c	0.96±0.07 a	6.09±0.35 ab	8.33±0.58 ab	2.00±0 f	橘红	红
杭杂601	92.38±14.31 cd	58.84±5.30 cd	45.28±2.27 cd	0.77±0.05 cd	6.11±0.17 ab	6.50±0.50 cd	6.00±1.00 de	红	绿
杭杂602	100.41±27.50 c	55.81±2.99 cde	43.05±0.86 de	0.77±0.05 cd	3.93±0.11 de	4.67±0.58 e	10.00±2.00 ab	红	绿
杭杂604	74.22±3.52 de	51.28±1.24 e	40.71±2.15 e	0.79±0.03 bcd	3.56±0.39 e	7.17±0.29 bc	8.67±0.58 bc	红	深绿
杭杂605	60.31±4.30 e	50.79±1.19 e	41.39±2.42 e	0.81±0.07 bc	3.61±1.70 e	5.67±0.58 de	8.67±1.15 bc	红	绿
杭杂606	98.24±5.05 c	60.79±3.73 cd	44.17±1.80 de	0.73±0.03 d	3.60±0.48 e	7.17±1.26 bc	8.33±1.53 bc	红	深绿
杭杂607	73.29±4.58 de	54.62±1.35 de	41.12±1.00 e	0.75±0.02 cd	5.05±0.08 bc	9.00±0.87 a	7.00±0 cd	红	绿
杭杂612	193.33±13.91 a	73.45±6.52 a	54.85±3.32 b	0.75±0.03 cd	4.93±0.19 cd	8.33±2.08 ab	10.67±1.15 a	粉	深绿
杭杂613	102.23±10.60 c	70.28±1.01 ab	60.52±2.38 a	0.86±0.02 b	4.88±0.31 cd	6.50±0.50 cd	7.00±0 cd	粉	红
杭杂614	82.01±8.22 cd	60.12±7.67 cd	43.53±2.58 de	0.72±0.05 d	3.77±0.34 e	7.17±0.29 bc	9.33±1.15 ab	红	绿

品种	单果重/g	果实横径/mm	果实纵径/mm	果形指数	果肉厚度/mm	硬度/（10⁵Pa）	心室数	果皮颜色	种腔颜色
嘉红100	132.27±14.05 b	63.08±5.06 bc	46.50±2.14 cd	0.74±0.03 d	6.66±0.82 a	7.50±0.50 bc	4.67±0.58 e	红	红
杭杂106	89.92±5.55 cd	50.38±4.54 e	48.16±2.84 c	0.96±0.07 a	6.09±0.35 ab	8.33±0.58 ab	2.00±0 f	橘红	红
杭杂601	92.38±14.31 cd	58.84±5.30 cd	45.28±2.27 cd	0.77±0.05 cd	6.11±0.17 ab	6.50±0.50 cd	6.00±1.00 de	红	绿
杭杂602	100.41±27.50 c	55.81±2.99 cde	43.05±0.86 de	0.77±0.05 cd	3.93±0.11 de	4.67±0.58 e	10.00±2.00 ab	红	绿
杭杂604	74.22±3.52 de	51.28±1.24 e	40.71±2.15 e	0.79±0.03 bcd	3.56±0.39 e	7.17±0.29 bc	8.67±0.58 bc	红	深绿
杭杂605	60.31±4.30 e	50.79±1.19 e	41.39±2.42 e	0.81±0.07 bc	3.61±1.70 e	5.67±0.58 de	8.67±1.15 bc	红	绿
杭杂606	98.24±5.05 c	60.79±3.73 cd	44.17±1.80 de	0.73±0.03 d	3.60±0.48 e	7.17±1.26 bc	8.33±1.53 bc	红	深绿
杭杂607	73.29±4.58 de	54.62±1.35 de	41.12±1.00 e	0.75±0.02 cd	5.05±0.08 bc	9.00±0.87 a	7.00±0 cd	红	绿
杭杂612	193.33±13.91 a	73.45±6.52 a	54.85±3.32 b	0.75±0.03 cd	4.93±0.19 cd	8.33±2.08 ab	10.67±1.15 a	粉	深绿
杭杂613	102.23±10.60 c	70.28±1.01 ab	60.52±2.38 a	0.86±0.02 b	4.88±0.31 cd	6.50±0.50 cd	7.00±0 cd	粉	红
杭杂614	82.01±8.22 cd	60.12±7.67 cd	43.53±2.58 de	0.72±0.05 d	3.77±0.34 e	7.17±0.29 bc	9.33±1.15 ab	红	绿

品种	可溶性固形物含量/%	总酸含量/%	糖酸比
嘉红100	6.47±0.12 e	0.68±0.05 c	9.57±0.74 def
杭杂106	4.60±0.01 g	0.56±0.04 d	8.27±0.57 g
杭杂601	6.80±0.26 d	0.76±0.04 b	8.96±0.68 efg
杭杂602	5.27±0.06 f	0.60±0.04 d	8.79±0.63 fg
杭杂604	7.93±0.06 b	0.77±0.05 ab	10.39±0.81 abcd
杭杂605	6.53±0.06 e	0.60±0.02 d	10.83±0.43 ab
杭杂606	7.60±0.17 c	0.80±0.03 ab	9.56±0.15 def
杭杂607	7.93±0.06 b	0.81±0.04 ab	9.87±0.52 bcde
杭杂612	6.53±0.06 e	0.60±0.03 d	10.92±0.45 a
杭杂613	6.53±0.15 e	0.67±0.01 c	9.72±0.16 cdef
杭杂614	8.83±0.06 a	0.83±0.06 a	10.63±0.78 abc

品种	可溶性固形物含量/%	总酸含量/%	糖酸比
嘉红100	6.47±0.12 e	0.68±0.05 c	9.57±0.74 def
杭杂106	4.60±0.01 g	0.56±0.04 d	8.27±0.57 g
杭杂601	6.80±0.26 d	0.76±0.04 b	8.96±0.68 efg
杭杂602	5.27±0.06 f	0.60±0.04 d	8.79±0.63 fg
杭杂604	7.93±0.06 b	0.77±0.05 ab	10.39±0.81 abcd
杭杂605	6.53±0.06 e	0.60±0.02 d	10.83±0.43 ab
杭杂606	7.60±0.17 c	0.80±0.03 ab	9.56±0.15 def
杭杂607	7.93±0.06 b	0.81±0.04 ab	9.87±0.52 bcde
杭杂612	6.53±0.06 e	0.60±0.03 d	10.92±0.45 a
杭杂613	6.53±0.15 e	0.67±0.01 c	9.72±0.16 cdef
杭杂614	8.83±0.06 a	0.83±0.06 a	10.63±0.78 abc

品种	评分	口感描述
嘉红100	6.3	沙脆，较酸，风味浓郁
杭杂106	5.8	生硬，较酸，风味寡淡
杭杂601	5.9	沙脆，较酸，风味中等
杭杂602	7.8	软糯，酸甜，风味浓郁
杭杂604	8.3	软糯，酸甜，风味浓郁
杭杂605	8.1	软糯，较酸，风味浓郁
杭杂606	7.9	软糯，甜，风味浓郁
杭杂607	7.6	软糯，较酸，风味中等
杭杂612	7.6	软糯，酸，风味中等
杭杂613	6.3	沙软，偏甜，风味寡淡
杭杂614	8.4	软糯，甜，风味中等