Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2024, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (1): 108-112.DOI: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20221225
Previous Articles Next Articles
ZENG Yannan(), ZHAO Hanwei, JI Hongting, WANG Qingnan, CHENG Rundong, WANG Yong, WANG Shihong, ZHAO Hejuan(
)
Received:
2022-12-20
Online:
2024-01-11
Published:
2024-01-17
CLC Number:
ZENG Yannan, ZHAO Hanwei, JI Hongting, WANG Qingnan, CHENG Rundong, WANG Yong, WANG Shihong, ZHAO Hejuan. Effects of foliar fertilizers on the growth of vegetable sweet potato under different fertilization levels[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(1): 108-112.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnykx.cn/EN/10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20221225
处理 | 基肥 | 叶面肥 |
---|---|---|
CK1 | 常规施肥 | 空白(对照1) |
CK2 | 减氮施肥 | 空白(对照2) |
1 | 常规施肥 | 氨基酸肥1 |
2 | 减氮施肥 | 氨基酸肥1 |
3 | 常规施肥 | 氨基酸肥2 |
4 | 减氮施肥 | 氨基酸肥2 |
5 | 常规施肥 | 花多多 |
6 | 减氮施肥 | 花多多 |
7 | 常规施肥 | 菜籽饼肥 |
8 | 减氮施肥 | 菜籽饼肥 |
Table 1 Experimental treatment design
处理 | 基肥 | 叶面肥 |
---|---|---|
CK1 | 常规施肥 | 空白(对照1) |
CK2 | 减氮施肥 | 空白(对照2) |
1 | 常规施肥 | 氨基酸肥1 |
2 | 减氮施肥 | 氨基酸肥1 |
3 | 常规施肥 | 氨基酸肥2 |
4 | 减氮施肥 | 氨基酸肥2 |
5 | 常规施肥 | 花多多 |
6 | 减氮施肥 | 花多多 |
7 | 常规施肥 | 菜籽饼肥 |
8 | 减氮施肥 | 菜籽饼肥 |
处理 | 嫩茎长/ cm | 嫩茎粗/ mm | 叶柄长/ cm | 叶长/ cm | 叶宽/ cm | 叶面积/ cm2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK1 | 12.33 a | 6.45 ab | 10.03 a | 8.53 a | 7.41 ab | 63.33 ab |
CK2 | 12.28 a | 5.97 b | 9.71 a | 8.38 a | 6.80 b | 57.26 b |
1 | 13.12 a | 6.57 a | 10.19 a | 9.16 a | 7.90 a | 72.35 a |
2 | 12.90 a | 6.24 ab | 9.72 a | 8.87 a | 7.46 ab | 66.21 ab |
3 | 12.54 a | 6.48 ab | 10.05 a | 9.10 a | 7.81 a | 71.19 ab |
4 | 12.90 a | 6.33 ab | 9.93 a | 8.64 a | 7.49 ab | 65.74 ab |
5 | 13.18 a | 6.65 a | 10.03 a | 9.29 a | 7.80 a | 72.55 a |
6 | 12.99 a | 6.44 ab | 9.76 a | 8.84 a | 7.56 ab | 67.06 ab |
7 | 13.61 a | 6.64 a | 10.20 a | 9.22 a | 7.78 a | 71.82 ab |
8 | 12.86 a | 6.42 ab | 9.79 a | 8.75 a | 7.71 a | 67.45 ab |
Table 2 Effects of different treatments on the growth of vegetable sweet potato shoot tips
处理 | 嫩茎长/ cm | 嫩茎粗/ mm | 叶柄长/ cm | 叶长/ cm | 叶宽/ cm | 叶面积/ cm2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK1 | 12.33 a | 6.45 ab | 10.03 a | 8.53 a | 7.41 ab | 63.33 ab |
CK2 | 12.28 a | 5.97 b | 9.71 a | 8.38 a | 6.80 b | 57.26 b |
1 | 13.12 a | 6.57 a | 10.19 a | 9.16 a | 7.90 a | 72.35 a |
2 | 12.90 a | 6.24 ab | 9.72 a | 8.87 a | 7.46 ab | 66.21 ab |
3 | 12.54 a | 6.48 ab | 10.05 a | 9.10 a | 7.81 a | 71.19 ab |
4 | 12.90 a | 6.33 ab | 9.93 a | 8.64 a | 7.49 ab | 65.74 ab |
5 | 13.18 a | 6.65 a | 10.03 a | 9.29 a | 7.80 a | 72.55 a |
6 | 12.99 a | 6.44 ab | 9.76 a | 8.84 a | 7.56 ab | 67.06 ab |
7 | 13.61 a | 6.64 a | 10.20 a | 9.22 a | 7.78 a | 71.82 ab |
8 | 12.86 a | 6.42 ab | 9.79 a | 8.75 a | 7.71 a | 67.45 ab |
处理 | 重复1/% | 重复2/% | 重复3/% | 重复4/% | 平均/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK1 | 9.87 | 9.84 | 9.97 | 9.70 | 9.84 a |
CK2 | 10.12 | 9.63 | 9.82 | 9.83 | 9.85 a |
1 | 10.21 | 10.11 | 9.09 | 9.28 | 9.67 ab |
2 | 9.71 | 9.51 | 9.51 | 9.63 | 9.59 ab |
3 | 9.25 | 9.81 | 9.48 | 9.69 | 9.56 ab |
4 | 10.03 | 8.99 | 9.38 | 9.12 | 9.38 ab |
5 | 9.56 | 9.45 | 9.79 | 9.13 | 9.48 ab |
6 | 9.13 | 9.38 | 9.61 | 9.81 | 9.48 ab |
7 | 8.88 | 9.36 | 9.51 | 9.09 | 9.21 b |
8 | 9.42 | 9.33 | 8.67 | 9.32 | 9.19 b |
Table 3 Effects of different treatments on shoot tip dry matter rate of vegetable sweet potato
处理 | 重复1/% | 重复2/% | 重复3/% | 重复4/% | 平均/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK1 | 9.87 | 9.84 | 9.97 | 9.70 | 9.84 a |
CK2 | 10.12 | 9.63 | 9.82 | 9.83 | 9.85 a |
1 | 10.21 | 10.11 | 9.09 | 9.28 | 9.67 ab |
2 | 9.71 | 9.51 | 9.51 | 9.63 | 9.59 ab |
3 | 9.25 | 9.81 | 9.48 | 9.69 | 9.56 ab |
4 | 10.03 | 8.99 | 9.38 | 9.12 | 9.38 ab |
5 | 9.56 | 9.45 | 9.79 | 9.13 | 9.48 ab |
6 | 9.13 | 9.38 | 9.61 | 9.81 | 9.48 ab |
7 | 8.88 | 9.36 | 9.51 | 9.09 | 9.21 b |
8 | 9.42 | 9.33 | 8.67 | 9.32 | 9.19 b |
处理 | 各采摘期产量/g | 累计产量/g | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||
CK1 | 585.98 a | 1 288.95 a | 1 968.00 ab | 1 695.90 a | 1 870.20ab | 1 993.41a | 1 470.86 ab | 10 873.30 a |
CK2 | 471.03 a | 908.29 a | 1 216.60 c | 993.00 b | 1 072.20 b | 1 239.03 b | 991.26 b | 6 891.41 c |
1 | 602.89 a | 1 340.36 a | 2 010.80 ab | 1 804.30 a | 1 943.10 ab | 2 021.21 a | 1 675.17 a | 11 397.83 a |
2 | 553.65 a | 1 062.04 a | 1 629.40 abc | 1 382.60 ab | 1 398.30 ab | 1 277.17 b | 1 213.25 ab | 8 516.41 bc |
3 | 594.02 a | 1 336.66 a | 1 985.70 ab | 1 772.50 a | 1 974.50 ab | 2 067.38 a | 1 534.18 ab | 11 264.94 a |
4 | 591.75 a | 1 024.50 a | 1 509.90 bc | 1 320.80 ab | 1 480.90 ab | 1 638.67 ab | 1 210.59 ab | 8 777.11 b |
5 | 593.95 a | 1 342.68 a | 2 020.60 ab | 1 749.50 a | 2 257.70 a | 2 054.11 a | 1 627.82 a | 11 646.36 a |
6 | 578.35 a | 1 008.06 a | 1 670.80 abc | 1 296.60 ab | 1 531.40 ab | 1 497.73 ab | 1 204.17 ab | 8 787.11 b |
7 | 597.39 a | 1 489.70 a | 2 103.00 a | 1 786.10 a | 2 127.50 a | 2 071.57 a | 1 560.33 ab | 11 735.59 a |
8 | 565.17 a | 1 491.03 a | 1 653.30 abc | 1 467.50 ab | 2 070.30 ab | 1 992.62 a | 1 420.43 ab | 10 660.35 a |
Table 4 Effects of different treatments on shoot tip yield of vegetable sweet potato
处理 | 各采摘期产量/g | 累计产量/g | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||
CK1 | 585.98 a | 1 288.95 a | 1 968.00 ab | 1 695.90 a | 1 870.20ab | 1 993.41a | 1 470.86 ab | 10 873.30 a |
CK2 | 471.03 a | 908.29 a | 1 216.60 c | 993.00 b | 1 072.20 b | 1 239.03 b | 991.26 b | 6 891.41 c |
1 | 602.89 a | 1 340.36 a | 2 010.80 ab | 1 804.30 a | 1 943.10 ab | 2 021.21 a | 1 675.17 a | 11 397.83 a |
2 | 553.65 a | 1 062.04 a | 1 629.40 abc | 1 382.60 ab | 1 398.30 ab | 1 277.17 b | 1 213.25 ab | 8 516.41 bc |
3 | 594.02 a | 1 336.66 a | 1 985.70 ab | 1 772.50 a | 1 974.50 ab | 2 067.38 a | 1 534.18 ab | 11 264.94 a |
4 | 591.75 a | 1 024.50 a | 1 509.90 bc | 1 320.80 ab | 1 480.90 ab | 1 638.67 ab | 1 210.59 ab | 8 777.11 b |
5 | 593.95 a | 1 342.68 a | 2 020.60 ab | 1 749.50 a | 2 257.70 a | 2 054.11 a | 1 627.82 a | 11 646.36 a |
6 | 578.35 a | 1 008.06 a | 1 670.80 abc | 1 296.60 ab | 1 531.40 ab | 1 497.73 ab | 1 204.17 ab | 8 787.11 b |
7 | 597.39 a | 1 489.70 a | 2 103.00 a | 1 786.10 a | 2 127.50 a | 2 071.57 a | 1 560.33 ab | 11 735.59 a |
8 | 565.17 a | 1 491.03 a | 1 653.30 abc | 1 467.50 ab | 2 070.30 ab | 1 992.62 a | 1 420.43 ab | 10 660.35 a |
处理 | 各采摘期分枝数 | 累计分枝数 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||
CK1 | 117 a | 140 ab | 213 a | 243 ab | 180 a | 228 a | 183 a | 1304 a |
CK2 | 92 a | 97 b | 146 a | 156 c | 115 b | 138 b | 90 b | 834 c |
1 | 126 a | 141ab | 215 a | 247 a | 185 a | 235 a | 183a | 1 332 a |
2 | 119 a | 121 ab | 166 a | 186 bc | 137 ab | 159 ab | 132 ab | 1 020 bc |
3 | 123 a | 144 ab | 217 a | 244 ab | 168 ab | 236 a | 183 a | 1 315 a |
4 | 118 a | 115 ab | 167 a | 167 ab | 139 ab | 170 ab | 129 ab | 1 005 bc |
5 | 119 a | 144 ab | 217 a | 248 a | 191 a | 235 a | 204 a | 1 358 a |
6 | 118 a | 111 ab | 174 a | 158 c | 151 ab | 189 ab | 140 ab | 1 041 bc |
7 | 123 a | 159 a | 217 a | 249 a | 185 a | 229 a | 199 a | 1 361 a |
8 | 119 a | 138 ab | 176 a | 200 abc | 175 a | 198 ab | 187 a | 1 193 ab |
Table 5 Effects of different treatments on the number of branches of vegetable sweet potato
处理 | 各采摘期分枝数 | 累计分枝数 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||
CK1 | 117 a | 140 ab | 213 a | 243 ab | 180 a | 228 a | 183 a | 1304 a |
CK2 | 92 a | 97 b | 146 a | 156 c | 115 b | 138 b | 90 b | 834 c |
1 | 126 a | 141ab | 215 a | 247 a | 185 a | 235 a | 183a | 1 332 a |
2 | 119 a | 121 ab | 166 a | 186 bc | 137 ab | 159 ab | 132 ab | 1 020 bc |
3 | 123 a | 144 ab | 217 a | 244 ab | 168 ab | 236 a | 183 a | 1 315 a |
4 | 118 a | 115 ab | 167 a | 167 ab | 139 ab | 170 ab | 129 ab | 1 005 bc |
5 | 119 a | 144 ab | 217 a | 248 a | 191 a | 235 a | 204 a | 1 358 a |
6 | 118 a | 111 ab | 174 a | 158 c | 151 ab | 189 ab | 140 ab | 1 041 bc |
7 | 123 a | 159 a | 217 a | 249 a | 185 a | 229 a | 199 a | 1 361 a |
8 | 119 a | 138 ab | 176 a | 200 abc | 175 a | 198 ab | 187 a | 1 193 ab |
处理 | 烫后颜色 | 香味 | 苦涩味 | 甜味 | 脆嫩度 | 纤维量 | 综合评分 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK1 | 翠绿 | 略香 | 无 | 无 | 一般 | 无 | 75 |
CK2 | 翠绿 | 略香 | 无 | 无 | 一般 | 无 | 75 |
1 | 翠绿 | 略香 | 无 | 微甜 | 脆 | 无 | 85 |
2 | 翠绿 | 略香 | 无 | 微甜 | 脆 | 无 | 85 |
3 | 翠绿 | 略香 | 无 | 微甜 | 脆 | 无 | 80 |
4 | 翠绿 | 略香 | 无 | 微甜 | 脆 | 无 | 80 |
5 | 翠绿 | 略香 | 无 | 无 | 一般 | 无 | 75 |
6 | 翠绿 | 略香 | 无 | 无 | 一般 | 无 | 80 |
7 | 翠绿 | 略香 | 无 | 微甜 | 脆 | 无 | 85 |
8 | 翠绿 | 略香 | 无 | 微甜 | 脆 | 无 | 85 |
Table 6 Taste performance of vegetable sweet potato stem tips in different treatment
处理 | 烫后颜色 | 香味 | 苦涩味 | 甜味 | 脆嫩度 | 纤维量 | 综合评分 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK1 | 翠绿 | 略香 | 无 | 无 | 一般 | 无 | 75 |
CK2 | 翠绿 | 略香 | 无 | 无 | 一般 | 无 | 75 |
1 | 翠绿 | 略香 | 无 | 微甜 | 脆 | 无 | 85 |
2 | 翠绿 | 略香 | 无 | 微甜 | 脆 | 无 | 85 |
3 | 翠绿 | 略香 | 无 | 微甜 | 脆 | 无 | 80 |
4 | 翠绿 | 略香 | 无 | 微甜 | 脆 | 无 | 80 |
5 | 翠绿 | 略香 | 无 | 无 | 一般 | 无 | 75 |
6 | 翠绿 | 略香 | 无 | 无 | 一般 | 无 | 80 |
7 | 翠绿 | 略香 | 无 | 微甜 | 脆 | 无 | 85 |
8 | 翠绿 | 略香 | 无 | 微甜 | 脆 | 无 | 85 |
[1] | 郭小丁, 张允刚, 史新敏. 菜用型甘薯嫩梢的开发利用[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2001(4): 40-41. |
[2] | 赵波, 张青, 张晓宇, 等. 茎尖菜用甘薯品种产量及品质分析[J]. 北京农学院学报, 2011, 26(1): 1-3. |
[3] | 王庆南, 赵荷娟, 程润东, 等. 菜用甘薯台农71的分枝发生规律及其应用[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2006, 34(6): 84-85, 206. |
[4] | 甘学德, 黄洁. 菜用型甘薯的研究概况及发展对策[J]. 热带农业科学, 2009, 29(9): 29-33, 45. |
[5] | 苑方武. 叶面肥的作用和喷施注意事项[J]. 农民致富之友, 2019(7): 142. |
[6] | 张静. 叶面肥及其在作物上的应用[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2007, 13(7): 143-144. |
[7] | 彭智平, 杨少海, 操君喜, 等. 专用叶面肥对黄瓜和节瓜产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2006(10): 21-22. |
[8] | 王炎, 李振宙, 周良, 等. 叶面喷施硼肥对苦荞根际土壤养分、植株生长及产量的影响[J]. 南方农业学报, 2018, 49(2): 253-257. |
[9] | 李燕婷, 李秀英, 肖艳, 等. 叶面肥的营养机理及应用研究进展[J]. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(1): 162-172. |
[10] | 谢英添, 马江黎, 吴文丽, 等. 7种不同叶面肥对西瓜生长、产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2021, 34(12): 63-67. |
[11] | 刘敏德, 何声团. 不同叶面肥组合对小型西瓜长势和品质的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2017(22): 59-62. |
[12] | 孙新娥, 申明, 王中华, 等. 两种叶面肥对日光温室芸豆叶片光合作用和果实品质的影响[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2011, 34(3): 37-42. |
[13] | 成学慧. 三种叶面肥对设施栽培葡萄与草莓植株生长和果实品质的影响[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2012. |
[14] | 胡晨曦, 张永吉, 李子恒, 等. 不同叶面肥喷施时期对樱桃番茄生长和产量的影响[J]. 长江蔬菜, 2020(10): 66-69. |
[1] | Bo LI. Effect of exogenous substances on yield and quality of upper tobacco leaves [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(2): 301-306. |
[2] | Cheng YANG, Yongfeng AI, Bowen LU, Dajiang SONG, Fenghua PAN. Effect of structural optimization on yield and quality of tobacco upper leaf in Tongren [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(2): 307-313. |
[3] | Wenjun ZHANG, Chengliang XIONG, Qingfu ZHANG, Weiyuan YAO, Tao XIA, Song GUO, Liu YANG. Effect of fertilizer synergist on growth and development of flue-cured tobacco and yield and quality of upper tobacco leaves [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(2): 314-319. |
[4] | Zhe WANG, Yuhang WANG, Xiaoqing WANG, Huaifu FAN. Effect of LED light quality control on celery growth and yield in plant factory [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(2): 340-344. |
[5] | Ruchao FENG, Zhe LIU, Shaogui GUO, Lina ZHANG, Jie ZHANG, Feng SHEN, Jiaqiu ZHENG, Yi MEI. Study on the application effect of Ruikangdun microbial agent on autumn continuous cropping watermelon [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(2): 345-349. |
[6] | Songlian CAI, Shanfen WU. Formula optimization of potato oat whole grain nutritional noodles [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(2): 405-408. |
[7] | Ying GE, Jinghui FAN, Qinghai LI, Hang LIU, Huanhuan WANG, Yinghui WEI, Lei ZHANG. Effects of low protein diets on growth performance and carcass quality of yellow feather broilers [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(2): 454-458. |
[8] | Yan ZHANG, Xiaokai FAN, Ruiheng XU, Ying WANG, Cuilian LIU, Haibin XIN. Study on the effect of nitrogen reduction and efficiency increase of deep fertilization on rice machine insertion [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(2): 253-257. |
[9] | Minhua JIANG, Yi DING, Haoran MENG, Kuan LI, Chao ZHANG, Yimin PAN. Effect of reduction of organic slow-release fertilizer application rates and time on late rice yield in Wucheng Distrist [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(2): 258-261. |
[10] | Huifang JIN, Guofu KONG, Fangzhen LI, Xiujuan WEN, Binghu XIAO, Yefang SUN, Haibo ZHANG. Effects of biochar-based fertilizer on physical and chemical properties of paddy soil,crop yield,and fertilizer reduction [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(2): 262-267. |
[11] | Yupei CHEN, Jianqiang LI, Haimin XU, Zhonglin WANG, Yingjie SHAN, Jie WANG, Weifeng ZHU, Ruohui LU. Effects of different zinc application methods on rice growth [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(2): 268-271. |
[12] | Li MEI, Fanyu MENG, Jihong ZHOU, Junying WANG, Jun LUO, Wanhong FENG, Fei GAO, Yan WANG, Yang ZHANG. Selection of winter wheat varieties suitable for wide extension in Beijing [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(2): 279-286. |
[13] | Yiming JIN, Bingfang LUO, Liansong MAO, Zhixin TAN. Field fertilizer efficiency test of wheat quota application of slow-release fertilizer [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(2): 292-295. |
[14] | Dongxing WANG, Juanhua TAO, Qiwei SHI, Yanan WANG, Jinchuan MA. Effects of different combinations of organic fertilizers and chemical fertilizers on tea yield and quality [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(2): 296-300. |
[15] | HE Yuehua, XUE Zhankui, XU Jingjing, SHI Jiawei, JIN Li, LIU Huifang. Effects of different slow-release fertilizer application rate and management on agronomic traits and yield of hybrid late rice [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(1): 37-40. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||