Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2024, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (2): 307-313.DOI: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20220819
Previous Articles Next Articles
Cheng YANG(), Yongfeng AI, Bowen LU, Dajiang SONG, Fenghua PAN(
)
Received:
2022-07-05
Online:
2024-02-11
Published:
2024-02-28
Contact:
Fenghua PAN
CLC Number:
Cheng YANG, Yongfeng AI, Bowen LU, Dajiang SONG, Fenghua PAN. Effect of structural optimization on yield and quality of tobacco upper leaf in Tongren[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(2): 307-313.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnykx.cn/EN/10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20220819
指标 | 权重 |
---|---|
成熟度 | 0.15 |
颜色 | 0.10 |
叶片结构 | 0.20 |
身份 | 0.20 |
油分 | 0.10 |
色度 | 0.10 |
叶片组织 | 0.05 |
柔韧性 | 0.05 |
光泽度 | 0.05 |
Table 1 Weight of each index of the appearance quality of the upper leaf
指标 | 权重 |
---|---|
成熟度 | 0.15 |
颜色 | 0.10 |
叶片结构 | 0.20 |
身份 | 0.20 |
油分 | 0.10 |
色度 | 0.10 |
叶片组织 | 0.05 |
柔韧性 | 0.05 |
光泽度 | 0.05 |
处理 | 株高/ cm | 茎围/ cm | 节距/ cm | 最大叶 面积/cm2 | 顶叶 面积/cm2 | 倒三叶 面积/cm2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1B1 | 128.71 a | 9.47 bc | 6.73 c | 1 410.01 b | 407.67 e | 1 037.60 b |
A1B2 | 123.32 b | 9.76 ab | 6.82 bc | 1 475.02 a | 543.91 a | 1 058.59 ab |
A1B3 | 121.44 bc | 9.53 bc | 6.86 bc | 1 460.38 a | 478.93 c | 1 054.06 ab |
A2B1 | 121.35 bc | 9.42 bc | 6.75 c | 1 232.16 e | 332.00 f | 846.83 e |
A2B2 | 129.23 a | 9.94 a | 7.14 a | 1 409.02 b | 454.73 cd | 996.25 c |
A2B3 | 123.45 b | 9.63 ab | 7.12 a | 1 303.90 d | 437.84 d | 971.93 c |
A3B1 | 117.46 c | 9.21 c | 6.63 c | 1 327.07 d | 402.04 e | 919.17 d |
A3B2 | 120.82 bc | 9.45 bc | 6.75 c | 1 467.44 a | 541.30 a | 1 067.58 a |
A3B3 | 129.26 a | 9.96 a | 6.92 b | 1 363.55 c | 507.60 b | 1 049.17 ab |
Table 2 Agronomic traits of flue-cured tobacco treated with different structure optimization at 90 days after transplanting
处理 | 株高/ cm | 茎围/ cm | 节距/ cm | 最大叶 面积/cm2 | 顶叶 面积/cm2 | 倒三叶 面积/cm2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1B1 | 128.71 a | 9.47 bc | 6.73 c | 1 410.01 b | 407.67 e | 1 037.60 b |
A1B2 | 123.32 b | 9.76 ab | 6.82 bc | 1 475.02 a | 543.91 a | 1 058.59 ab |
A1B3 | 121.44 bc | 9.53 bc | 6.86 bc | 1 460.38 a | 478.93 c | 1 054.06 ab |
A2B1 | 121.35 bc | 9.42 bc | 6.75 c | 1 232.16 e | 332.00 f | 846.83 e |
A2B2 | 129.23 a | 9.94 a | 7.14 a | 1 409.02 b | 454.73 cd | 996.25 c |
A2B3 | 123.45 b | 9.63 ab | 7.12 a | 1 303.90 d | 437.84 d | 971.93 c |
A3B1 | 117.46 c | 9.21 c | 6.63 c | 1 327.07 d | 402.04 e | 919.17 d |
A3B2 | 120.82 bc | 9.45 bc | 6.75 c | 1 467.44 a | 541.30 a | 1 067.58 a |
A3B3 | 129.26 a | 9.96 a | 6.92 b | 1 363.55 c | 507.60 b | 1 049.17 ab |
处理 | 667 m2 产量/kg | 均价/ (元·kg-1) | 667 m2 产值/元 | 上等烟 比例/% | 中上等烟 比例/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1B1 | 75.07 a | 31.36 a | 2 354.32 a | 63.72 a | 98.32 a |
A1B2 | 68.29 b | 30.58 a | 2 088.39 b | 63.56 a | 97.65 a |
A1B3 | 60.36 c | 28.12 b | 1 697.32 c | 58.33 b | 97.01 a |
A2B1 | 73.32 a | 31.66 a | 2 321.56 a | 64.81 a | 98.55 a |
A2B2 | 67.69 b | 30.54 a | 2 067.36 b | 64.03 a | 98.63 a |
A2B3 | 61.13 c | 28.49 b | 1 741.59 c | 59.03 b | 97.98 a |
A3B1 | 76.24 a | 31.33 a | 2 388.63 a | 63.22 a | 98.08 a |
A3B2 | 67.62 b | 31.07 a | 2 101.23 b | 62.42 a | 98.15 a |
A3B3 | 60.21 c | 28.56 b | 1 719.60 c | 58.34 b | 97.81 a |
Table 3 Economic properties of upper tobacco leaves under different structure optimization treatments
处理 | 667 m2 产量/kg | 均价/ (元·kg-1) | 667 m2 产值/元 | 上等烟 比例/% | 中上等烟 比例/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1B1 | 75.07 a | 31.36 a | 2 354.32 a | 63.72 a | 98.32 a |
A1B2 | 68.29 b | 30.58 a | 2 088.39 b | 63.56 a | 97.65 a |
A1B3 | 60.36 c | 28.12 b | 1 697.32 c | 58.33 b | 97.01 a |
A2B1 | 73.32 a | 31.66 a | 2 321.56 a | 64.81 a | 98.55 a |
A2B2 | 67.69 b | 30.54 a | 2 067.36 b | 64.03 a | 98.63 a |
A2B3 | 61.13 c | 28.49 b | 1 741.59 c | 59.03 b | 97.98 a |
A3B1 | 76.24 a | 31.33 a | 2 388.63 a | 63.22 a | 98.08 a |
A3B2 | 67.62 b | 31.07 a | 2 101.23 b | 62.42 a | 98.15 a |
A3B3 | 60.21 c | 28.56 b | 1 719.60 c | 58.34 b | 97.81 a |
处理 | 颜色 | 成熟度 | 叶片结构 | 身份 | 油分 | 色度 | 叶片组织 | 柔韧 | 光泽度 | 总分 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1B1 | 7.00 | 7.00 | 7.00 | 6.50 | 5.50 | 5.50 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 6.30 |
A1B2 | 8.50 | 8.00 | 8.50 | 7.50 | 5.50 | 7.00 | 6.00 | 6.00 | 5.50 | 7.38 |
A1B3 | 7.00 | 7.00 | 7.00 | 6.50 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 6.20 |
A2B1 | 7.00 | 7.50 | 7.00 | 7.50 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 6.48 |
A2B2 | 7.00 | 7.00 | 7.00 | 7.00 | 5.00 | 4.50 | 5.00 | 4.50 | 5.00 | 6.23 |
A2B3 | 7.50 | 7.00 | 7.00 | 7.50 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 4.50 | 5.00 | 6.43 |
A3B1 | 7.50 | 7.00 | 7.00 | 7.00 | 5.00 | 6.00 | 5.50 | 5.50 | 5.00 | 6.50 |
A3B2 | 7.50 | 7.50 | 7.50 | 7.50 | 5.00 | 6.00 | 5.50 | 5.50 | 5.00 | 6.78 |
A3B3 | 7.50 | 7.50 | 7.50 | 7.50 | 5.00 | 6.00 | 5.50 | 5.50 | 5.00 | 6.78 |
Table 4 Appearance quality of upper tobacco leaves treated with different structure optimization
处理 | 颜色 | 成熟度 | 叶片结构 | 身份 | 油分 | 色度 | 叶片组织 | 柔韧 | 光泽度 | 总分 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1B1 | 7.00 | 7.00 | 7.00 | 6.50 | 5.50 | 5.50 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 6.30 |
A1B2 | 8.50 | 8.00 | 8.50 | 7.50 | 5.50 | 7.00 | 6.00 | 6.00 | 5.50 | 7.38 |
A1B3 | 7.00 | 7.00 | 7.00 | 6.50 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 6.20 |
A2B1 | 7.00 | 7.50 | 7.00 | 7.50 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 6.48 |
A2B2 | 7.00 | 7.00 | 7.00 | 7.00 | 5.00 | 4.50 | 5.00 | 4.50 | 5.00 | 6.23 |
A2B3 | 7.50 | 7.00 | 7.00 | 7.50 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 4.50 | 5.00 | 6.43 |
A3B1 | 7.50 | 7.00 | 7.00 | 7.00 | 5.00 | 6.00 | 5.50 | 5.50 | 5.00 | 6.50 |
A3B2 | 7.50 | 7.50 | 7.50 | 7.50 | 5.00 | 6.00 | 5.50 | 5.50 | 5.00 | 6.78 |
A3B3 | 7.50 | 7.50 | 7.50 | 7.50 | 5.00 | 6.00 | 5.50 | 5.50 | 5.00 | 6.78 |
处理 | 香气质 | 香气量 | 透发性 | 杂气 | 细腻度 | 柔和度 | 圆润感 | 刺激性 | 干燥感 | 余味 | 总分 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1B1 | 6.00 | 6.50 | 5.00 | 5.50 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 4.50 | 5.00 | 4.50 | 5.00 | 67.50 |
A1B2 | 6.00 | 6.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.50 | 5.50 | 5.50 | 5.00 | 5.50 | 69.10 |
A1B3 | 6.50 | 6.00 | 5.50 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.50 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 68.50 |
A2B1 | 6.00 | 6.50 | 5.00 | 5.50 | 5.50 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 4.50 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 68.50 |
A2B2 | 6.50 | 6.00 | 5.50 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 4.50 | 5.00 | 67.50 |
A2B3 | 6.00 | 6.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.50 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 4.50 | 4.50 | 66.00 |
A3B1 | 6.00 | 6.50 | 5.00 | 5.50 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 4.50 | 5.00 | 4.50 | 5.00 | 67.50 |
A3B2 | 6.00 | 6.50 | 5.50 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 4.50 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 67.50 |
A3B3 | 6.50 | 6.00 | 5.50 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.50 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 68.50 |
Table 5 Sensory quality of upper tobacco leaves treated with different structure optimization
处理 | 香气质 | 香气量 | 透发性 | 杂气 | 细腻度 | 柔和度 | 圆润感 | 刺激性 | 干燥感 | 余味 | 总分 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1B1 | 6.00 | 6.50 | 5.00 | 5.50 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 4.50 | 5.00 | 4.50 | 5.00 | 67.50 |
A1B2 | 6.00 | 6.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.50 | 5.50 | 5.50 | 5.00 | 5.50 | 69.10 |
A1B3 | 6.50 | 6.00 | 5.50 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.50 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 68.50 |
A2B1 | 6.00 | 6.50 | 5.00 | 5.50 | 5.50 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 4.50 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 68.50 |
A2B2 | 6.50 | 6.00 | 5.50 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 4.50 | 5.00 | 67.50 |
A2B3 | 6.00 | 6.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.50 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 4.50 | 4.50 | 66.00 |
A3B1 | 6.00 | 6.50 | 5.00 | 5.50 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 4.50 | 5.00 | 4.50 | 5.00 | 67.50 |
A3B2 | 6.00 | 6.50 | 5.50 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 4.50 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 67.50 |
A3B3 | 6.50 | 6.00 | 5.50 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.50 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 68.50 |
处理 | 总糖含量/% | 还原糖含量/% | 烟碱含量/% | 总氮含量/% | 钾含量/% | 氯含量/% | 两糖比 | 糖碱比 | 钾氯比 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1B1 | 24.57 c | 22.40 c | 3.21 b | 2.01 c | 1.55 de | 0.19 d | 0.91 d | 6.97 bc | 8.16 c |
A1B2 | 25.24 bc | 22.75 c | 2.72 c | 1.84 d | 1.43 e | 0.12 e | 0.90 d | 8.36 b | 11.92 a |
A1B3 | 22.15 de | 19.59 d | 3.11 b | 2.34 b | 1.78 bc | 0.21 c | 0.88 e | 6.30 c | 8.48 c |
A2B1 | 26.24 b | 24.86 ab | 3.42 a | 2.37 b | 1.81 b | 0.23 c | 0.94 bc | 7.27 c | 7.87 d |
A2B2 | 26.12 b | 24.78 ab | 2.53 d | 2.32 b | 1.87 b | 0.28 a | 0.95 b | 9.79 a | 6.68 e |
A2B3 | 20.95 e | 20.12 d | 3.19 b | 2.54 a | 2.26 a | 0.29 a | 0.96 ab | 6.31 c | 7.79 d |
A3B1 | 22.96 d | 20.71 d | 2.69 cd | 2.00 c | 1.09 f | 0.11 e | 0.90 d | 7.70 b | 9.91 b |
A3B2 | 28.33 a | 26.30 a | 2.49 d | 2.14 c | 1.41 e | 0.26 b | 0.93 c | 10.56 a | 5.42 f |
A3B3 | 25.07 bc | 24.44 b | 3.26 ab | 2.10 c | 1.63 cd | 0.26 b | 0.97 a | 7.50 bc | 6.27 e |
Table 6 Conventional chemical composition and coordination of tobacco leaves treated with different structure optimization
处理 | 总糖含量/% | 还原糖含量/% | 烟碱含量/% | 总氮含量/% | 钾含量/% | 氯含量/% | 两糖比 | 糖碱比 | 钾氯比 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1B1 | 24.57 c | 22.40 c | 3.21 b | 2.01 c | 1.55 de | 0.19 d | 0.91 d | 6.97 bc | 8.16 c |
A1B2 | 25.24 bc | 22.75 c | 2.72 c | 1.84 d | 1.43 e | 0.12 e | 0.90 d | 8.36 b | 11.92 a |
A1B3 | 22.15 de | 19.59 d | 3.11 b | 2.34 b | 1.78 bc | 0.21 c | 0.88 e | 6.30 c | 8.48 c |
A2B1 | 26.24 b | 24.86 ab | 3.42 a | 2.37 b | 1.81 b | 0.23 c | 0.94 bc | 7.27 c | 7.87 d |
A2B2 | 26.12 b | 24.78 ab | 2.53 d | 2.32 b | 1.87 b | 0.28 a | 0.95 b | 9.79 a | 6.68 e |
A2B3 | 20.95 e | 20.12 d | 3.19 b | 2.54 a | 2.26 a | 0.29 a | 0.96 ab | 6.31 c | 7.79 d |
A3B1 | 22.96 d | 20.71 d | 2.69 cd | 2.00 c | 1.09 f | 0.11 e | 0.90 d | 7.70 b | 9.91 b |
A3B2 | 28.33 a | 26.30 a | 2.49 d | 2.14 c | 1.41 e | 0.26 b | 0.93 c | 10.56 a | 5.42 f |
A3B3 | 25.07 bc | 24.44 b | 3.26 ab | 2.10 c | 1.63 cd | 0.26 b | 0.97 a | 7.50 bc | 6.27 e |
[1] | 骆园, 张欢欢, 熊德中. 培肥措施对植烟土壤主要理化性状及烟草经济效益的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2016, 32(2): 351-356. |
[2] | 张谦, 胡剑波. 新形势下云南烟草经济发展的SWOT分析与对策[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2011, 39(6): 3722-3725. |
[3] | 蒋志兴, 施维, 龚明明, 等. 新常态下烟草经济增长的途径[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2016, 22(3): 116-120. |
[4] | 张国春. 重庆万州烤烟种植气候生态适宜性规律分析[J]. 大气科学研究与应用, 2015(1): 109-115. |
[5] | 普光彪, 刘敬业, 冉邦定. 玉溪烤烟适宜气候生态类型划分[J]. 玉溪师专学报, 1995, 11(4): 54-57. |
[6] | 王小东, 许自成, 刘占卿, 等. 液膜覆盖对烟田土壤水热状况和烤烟生长发育的影响[J]. 节水灌溉, 2008(4): 8-10, 14. |
[7] | 高家合, 杨宇虹. 不同生态环境对烤烟内在质量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2006, 22(5): 168-170. |
[8] | 曹仕明, 李进平, 吴自友, 等. 不同生态环境与烤烟质量特征的关系[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2010, 38(10): 42-45. |
[9] | 颜侃, 陈宗瑜. 不同生态条件对烤烟形态及相关生理指标的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(10): 3087-3097. |
[10] | 马京民, 马聪, 王建刚, 等. 灵山烟区生态环境及其烤烟质量评价[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2006, 8(5): 83-89. |
[11] | 陈文, 刘红恩, 王勇, 等. 烟田微生态环境对烤烟光合作用影响研究进展[J]. 江西农业学报, 2011, 23(2): 85-88. |
[12] | 冯吉, 孙光伟, 刘丹, 等. 不同海拔、打顶时期及留叶数对烤烟产量和品质的影响[J]. 山西农业科学, 2019, 47(11): 1937-1940, 1946. |
[13] | 和占辉, 尹浩, 张雪奇, 等. 打顶时间和留叶数对丽江烟叶等级结构及品质的影响[J]. 现代农业科技, 2019(3): 12-14. |
[14] | 邵雪莲, 刘润生, 曾浩, 等. 不同打顶时间及留叶数对云烟87产质量的影响[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2017(6): 130-134. |
[15] | 岳耀稳, 张仲友, 李世金, 等. 不同打顶时期和留叶数对黄山烤烟产质量的影响[J]. 现代农业科技, 2015(16): 13-14. |
[16] | 齐凌峰, 张明乾, 李菁菁, 等. 烟叶油润度参比样的制作与分析[J]. 福建农业科技, 2020(3): 32-35. |
[17] | 王正旭, 陈明辉, 申国明, 等. 施氮量和留叶数对烤烟红花大金元产质量的影响[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2011, 32(3): 76-79. |
[18] | 王正旭, 向德恩, 孟贵星, 等. 施氮量和留叶数对中烟100产质量的影响[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2011, 32(S1): 45-49. |
[19] | 申宴斌, 刘彦中, 马剑雄, 等. 不同留叶数对烤烟新品种NC297生长及产质量的影响[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2009, 30(6): 57-60, 64. |
[20] | 汤一卒, 江华山, 徐克芳, 等. 烤烟栽培若干农艺措施的产质效应: Ⅰ.农艺措施与产量[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 1993, 16(3): 1-5. |
[21] | REAGAN T E, RABB R L, COLLINS W K. Tobacco budworm: influence of early topping and sucker control practices on infestations in flue-cured tobacco[J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 1974, 67(4): 551-552. |
[22] | CRAFTS-BRANDNER S J. Nonstructural carbohydrate metabolism during leaf ageing in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum)[J]. Physiologia Plantarum, 1991, 82(2): 299-305. |
[23] | HIBI N, HIGASHIGUCHI S, HASHIMOTO T, et al. Gene expression in tobacco low-nicotine mutants[J]. The Plant Cell, 1994, 6(5): 723-735. |
[24] | HASHIMOTO T, YAMADA Y. Alkaloid biogenesis: molecular aspects[J]. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, 1994, 45: 257-285. |
[25] | 史宏志, 张建勋. 烟草生物碱[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2004. |
[26] | 余志虹, 陈建军, 林锐锋, 等. 不同打顶方式对烤烟农艺性状及上部叶可用性的影响[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2012, 33(4): 429-433. |
[27] | 宋淑芳, 陈建军, 周冀衡. 留叶数对烤烟品质形成的影响[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2012, 33(6): 39-43, 47. |
[28] | 武云杰, 杨铁钊, 张小全, 等. 打顶时期对不同烤烟品种烘烤特性的影响[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2013, 34(6): 30-37. |
[1] | Bo LI. Effect of exogenous substances on yield and quality of upper tobacco leaves [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(2): 301-306. |
[2] | Wenjun ZHANG, Chengliang XIONG, Qingfu ZHANG, Weiyuan YAO, Tao XIA, Song GUO, Liu YANG. Effect of fertilizer synergist on growth and development of flue-cured tobacco and yield and quality of upper tobacco leaves [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(2): 314-319. |
[3] | Xiaoxiang CHEN, Wenjun ZHANG, Zhengguang ZHAI, Zhiqiang XU, Huabing LIU, Yongjian ZHONG, Zhimin JIANG. PPI network analysis of differentially expressed mRNA in the roots of tobacco varieties resistant to Meloidogyne incongnita (Kofold&White) Chitwood [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(2): 395-400. |
[4] | Quanwei GUO, Chengshuang ZHANG, Yuhua WANG, Zengbo FAN, Yong ZHANG, Zhiyong ZENG, Shilei LI. Research and application of multi-element clean heating system for tobacco baking [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(2): 409-412. |
[5] | LI Zilin, YANG Ji, LIU Xiaohui, MA Yiwen, TANG Yuanxiang, LI Xuewei. Comparative study on the control effects of different agents on tobacco viral disease [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(1): 162-165. |
[6] | LI Bo, CHEN Xiaoxiang, ZHANG Wenjun, ZHAI Zhengguang, LIU Huabing, JIANG Zhimin, XU Zhiqiang. Effects of exogenous GA3 and ABA on endogenous hormone regulation and conventional chemical composition of flue-cured tobacco [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(1): 181-189. |
[7] | FAN Yuxin, WANG Lijun, BAI Feng, XU Chensheng, DUAN Weidong, SHEN Hongtao, WANG Yanfang, LIU Ling. Analysis on the changes of chemical components and sensory quality of Fujian Nanping redried tobacco strips during natural aging [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(1): 190-196. |
[8] | GUO Quanwei, ZHANG Yinghua, CUI Zhijun, WANG Shuke, DU Yuhai, FAN Zengbo, LIU Yang, ZHANG Yong, WANG Yi. Effect of Yandashuai organic fertilizer on yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(1): 61-65. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||