Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2025, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (1): 168-171.DOI: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20231004
Previous Articles Next Articles
AO Cun(), SHI Daliang, NIU Xiaojun, ZHANG Lin, GUO Minming, ZHAO Yun*(
)
Received:
2023-10-13
Online:
2025-01-11
Published:
2025-01-14
CLC Number:
AO Cun, SHI Daliang, NIU Xiaojun, ZHANG Lin, GUO Minming, ZHAO Yun. Comparison of quality of different shaped yellow tea processed from Zhonghuang 1[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(1): 168-171.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnykx.cn/EN/10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20231004
处理 | 外形 | 汤色 | 香气 | 滋味 | 叶底 | 总分 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
评语 | 评分 | 评语 | 评分 | 评语 | 评分 | 评语 | 评分 | 评语 | 评分 | ||
卷曲形 | 稍卷曲,较紧结,显毫,嫩黄鲜润 | 91 | 浅嫩黄明亮 | 93.0 | 嫩甜,带花香,微闷 | 92.0 | 较甘醇,有花香,微闷 | 92.0 | 尚细嫩成朵,嫩黄明亮 | 90.5 | 91.7 |
朵形 | 朵形,多毫,嫩黄鲜润 | 91 | 浅嫩黄明亮 | 92.5 | 嫩甜 | 93.0 | 较甘醇,有嫩香 | 93.0 | 尚细嫩成朵,嫩黄鲜亮 | 91.0 | 92.3 |
凤形 | 凤形,较挺直,略有毫,嫩黄,润 | 90 | 浅黄明亮 | 91.0 | 较嫩甜,微闷 | 91.0 | 浓醇,微涩,微水闷,有嫩香 | 89.0 | 尚细嫩成朵,嫩黄明亮 | 90.5 | 90.1 |
扁形 | 扁平,较挺直,尚光,嫩黄,润 | 88 | 黄稍深,明亮 | 88.0 | 有嫩香,略闷 | 88.0 | 浓尚醇,微高火,略苦涩,略闷 | 87.0 | 尚细嫩成朵,嫩黄鲜亮 | 91.0 | 88.0 |
条形 | 稍弯,较紧结,多毫,嫩绿黄,润 | 90 | 嫩绿黄明亮 | 91.0 | 嫩鲜,带清香 | 90.0 | 较浓醇,嫩鲜,微涩 | 91.0 | 尚细嫩成朵,嫩绿黄鲜亮 | 90.0 | 90.4 |
Table 1 Sensory evaluation results of different shapes of yellow tea
处理 | 外形 | 汤色 | 香气 | 滋味 | 叶底 | 总分 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
评语 | 评分 | 评语 | 评分 | 评语 | 评分 | 评语 | 评分 | 评语 | 评分 | ||
卷曲形 | 稍卷曲,较紧结,显毫,嫩黄鲜润 | 91 | 浅嫩黄明亮 | 93.0 | 嫩甜,带花香,微闷 | 92.0 | 较甘醇,有花香,微闷 | 92.0 | 尚细嫩成朵,嫩黄明亮 | 90.5 | 91.7 |
朵形 | 朵形,多毫,嫩黄鲜润 | 91 | 浅嫩黄明亮 | 92.5 | 嫩甜 | 93.0 | 较甘醇,有嫩香 | 93.0 | 尚细嫩成朵,嫩黄鲜亮 | 91.0 | 92.3 |
凤形 | 凤形,较挺直,略有毫,嫩黄,润 | 90 | 浅黄明亮 | 91.0 | 较嫩甜,微闷 | 91.0 | 浓醇,微涩,微水闷,有嫩香 | 89.0 | 尚细嫩成朵,嫩黄明亮 | 90.5 | 90.1 |
扁形 | 扁平,较挺直,尚光,嫩黄,润 | 88 | 黄稍深,明亮 | 88.0 | 有嫩香,略闷 | 88.0 | 浓尚醇,微高火,略苦涩,略闷 | 87.0 | 尚细嫩成朵,嫩黄鲜亮 | 91.0 | 88.0 |
条形 | 稍弯,较紧结,多毫,嫩绿黄,润 | 90 | 嫩绿黄明亮 | 91.0 | 嫩鲜,带清香 | 90.0 | 较浓醇,嫩鲜,微涩 | 91.0 | 尚细嫩成朵,嫩绿黄鲜亮 | 90.0 | 90.4 |
处理 | 游离氨基酸浓度/ (mg·mL-1) | 茶多酚浓度/ (mg·mL-1) | 水浸出物浓度/ (mg·mL-1) | 咖啡碱浓度/ (mg·mL-1) | 非酯型儿茶素浓度/ (mg·mL-1) | 酯型儿茶素浓度/ (mg·mL-1) | 儿茶素总浓度/ (mg·mL-1) | 酚氨比 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
卷曲形 | 0.55±0.01 c | 0.75±0.02 c | 3.11±0.09 c | 0.47±0.02 c | 0.12±0.00 d | 0.33±0.01 e | 0.45±0.01 e | 1.37±0.03 d |
朵形 | 0.53±0.02 c | 0.80±0.04 c | 3.21±0.11 c | 0.52±0.02 ab | 0.13±0.00 d | 0.40±0.02 d | 0.53±0.02 d | 1.51±0.04 c |
凤形 | 0.73±0.03 b | 1.19±0.02 b | 4.40±0.14 b | 0.53±0.02 ab | 0.19±0.01 b | 0.63±0.02 b | 0.82±0.03 b | 1.63±0.05 b |
扁形 | 0.80±0.00 a | 1.45±0.02 a | 4.90±0.10 a | 0.55±0.01 a | 0.22±0.00 a | 0.78±0.02 a | 1.00±0.03 a | 1.81±0.02 a |
条形 | 0.72±0.02 b | 1.17±0.03 b | 4.17±0.07 b | 0.50±0.00 bc | 0.17±0.00 c | 0.59±0.00 c | 0.76±0.00 c | 1.61±0.04 b |
Table 2 Concentration of physical and chemical components and the ratio of tea polyphenols to amino acid in tea infusion
处理 | 游离氨基酸浓度/ (mg·mL-1) | 茶多酚浓度/ (mg·mL-1) | 水浸出物浓度/ (mg·mL-1) | 咖啡碱浓度/ (mg·mL-1) | 非酯型儿茶素浓度/ (mg·mL-1) | 酯型儿茶素浓度/ (mg·mL-1) | 儿茶素总浓度/ (mg·mL-1) | 酚氨比 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
卷曲形 | 0.55±0.01 c | 0.75±0.02 c | 3.11±0.09 c | 0.47±0.02 c | 0.12±0.00 d | 0.33±0.01 e | 0.45±0.01 e | 1.37±0.03 d |
朵形 | 0.53±0.02 c | 0.80±0.04 c | 3.21±0.11 c | 0.52±0.02 ab | 0.13±0.00 d | 0.40±0.02 d | 0.53±0.02 d | 1.51±0.04 c |
凤形 | 0.73±0.03 b | 1.19±0.02 b | 4.40±0.14 b | 0.53±0.02 ab | 0.19±0.01 b | 0.63±0.02 b | 0.82±0.03 b | 1.63±0.05 b |
扁形 | 0.80±0.00 a | 1.45±0.02 a | 4.90±0.10 a | 0.55±0.01 a | 0.22±0.00 a | 0.78±0.02 a | 1.00±0.03 a | 1.81±0.02 a |
条形 | 0.72±0.02 b | 1.17±0.03 b | 4.17±0.07 b | 0.50±0.00 bc | 0.17±0.00 c | 0.59±0.00 c | 0.76±0.00 c | 1.61±0.04 b |
处理 | 游离氨基酸 含量/% | 茶多酚含量/ % | 水浸出物 含量/% | 咖啡碱 含量/% | 非酯型儿茶素 含量/% | 酯型儿茶素 含量/% | 儿茶素总 含量/% | 酚氨比 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
卷曲形 | 5.45±0.09 a | 16.23±0.17 ab | 41.98±0.08 bc | 3.23±0.02 a | 2.61±0.01 b | 9.34±0.06 b | 11.95±0.05 b | 2.98±0.07 a |
朵形 | 5.39±0.09 a | 15.68±0.54 b | 41.69±0.06 c | 3.23±0.02 a | 2.60±0.01 bc | 9.32±0.16 b | 11.92±0.15 b | 2.91±0.10 a |
凤形 | 5.54±0.08 a | 17.07±0.06 a | 43.03±0.69 ab | 3.22±0.08 a | 2.62±0.04 b | 9.26±0.26 b | 11.88±0.29 b | 3.08±0.04 a |
扁形 | 5.50±0.14 a | 16.16±0.05 ab | 41.95±0.43 bc | 3.20±0.01 a | 2.56±0.00 c | 9.07±0.04 b | 11.63±0.04 b | 2.94±0.07 a |
条形 | 5.57±0.10 a | 16.67±0.57 a | 43.18±0.55 a | 3.20±0.03 a | 2.71±0.01 a | 9.89±0.09 a | 12.60±0.10 a | 2.99±0.06 a |
Table 3 Content of physical and chemical components and the ratio of tea polyphenols to amino acid in dried tea
处理 | 游离氨基酸 含量/% | 茶多酚含量/ % | 水浸出物 含量/% | 咖啡碱 含量/% | 非酯型儿茶素 含量/% | 酯型儿茶素 含量/% | 儿茶素总 含量/% | 酚氨比 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
卷曲形 | 5.45±0.09 a | 16.23±0.17 ab | 41.98±0.08 bc | 3.23±0.02 a | 2.61±0.01 b | 9.34±0.06 b | 11.95±0.05 b | 2.98±0.07 a |
朵形 | 5.39±0.09 a | 15.68±0.54 b | 41.69±0.06 c | 3.23±0.02 a | 2.60±0.01 bc | 9.32±0.16 b | 11.92±0.15 b | 2.91±0.10 a |
凤形 | 5.54±0.08 a | 17.07±0.06 a | 43.03±0.69 ab | 3.22±0.08 a | 2.62±0.04 b | 9.26±0.26 b | 11.88±0.29 b | 3.08±0.04 a |
扁形 | 5.50±0.14 a | 16.16±0.05 ab | 41.95±0.43 bc | 3.20±0.01 a | 2.56±0.00 c | 9.07±0.04 b | 11.63±0.04 b | 2.94±0.07 a |
条形 | 5.57±0.10 a | 16.67±0.57 a | 43.18±0.55 a | 3.20±0.03 a | 2.71±0.01 a | 9.89±0.09 a | 12.60±0.10 a | 2.99±0.06 a |
处理 | GC | EGC | C | EGCG | EC | GCG | ECG | CG |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
卷曲形 | 37.0±0.3 d | 44.8±1.2 e | 9.0±0.2 c | 251.2±8.8 d | 26.1±0.6 c | 5.2±0.0 e | 75.7±2.2 e | 2.6±0.1 bc |
朵形 | 37.0±1.1 d | 53.4±1.6 d | 8.6±0.3 c | 299.8±12.9 c | 27.9±0.6 c | 6.7±0.2 d | 87.1±3.6 d | 3.2±0.1 b |
凤形 | 59.0±1.0 b | 82.0±5.7 b | 13.0±0.4 b | 481.9±13.5 b | 40.5±2.2 b | 11.5±0.0 b | 134.7±3.0 b | 3.1±0.5 bc |
扁形 | 72.0±2.5 a | 90.1±0.4 a | 15.6±0.8 a | 596.0±16.9 a | 47.2±0.9 a | 19.2±0.6 a | 163.6±4.8 a | 4.4±0.0 a |
条形 | 46.5±0.8 c | 73.8±0.4 c | 13.2±0.1 b | 452.1±2.0 b | 39.8±0.2 b | 9.3±0.2 c | 125.3±1.0 c | 2.4±0.3 c |
Table 4 Concentration of various catechins in tea infusion 单位:μg·mL-1
处理 | GC | EGC | C | EGCG | EC | GCG | ECG | CG |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
卷曲形 | 37.0±0.3 d | 44.8±1.2 e | 9.0±0.2 c | 251.2±8.8 d | 26.1±0.6 c | 5.2±0.0 e | 75.7±2.2 e | 2.6±0.1 bc |
朵形 | 37.0±1.1 d | 53.4±1.6 d | 8.6±0.3 c | 299.8±12.9 c | 27.9±0.6 c | 6.7±0.2 d | 87.1±3.6 d | 3.2±0.1 b |
凤形 | 59.0±1.0 b | 82.0±5.7 b | 13.0±0.4 b | 481.9±13.5 b | 40.5±2.2 b | 11.5±0.0 b | 134.7±3.0 b | 3.1±0.5 bc |
扁形 | 72.0±2.5 a | 90.1±0.4 a | 15.6±0.8 a | 596.0±16.9 a | 47.2±0.9 a | 19.2±0.6 a | 163.6±4.8 a | 4.4±0.0 a |
条形 | 46.5±0.8 c | 73.8±0.4 c | 13.2±0.1 b | 452.1±2.0 b | 39.8±0.2 b | 9.3±0.2 c | 125.3±1.0 c | 2.4±0.3 c |
处理 | GC | EGC | C | EGCG | EC | GCG | ECG | CG |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
卷曲形 | 0.77±0.00 ab | 0.78±0.00 b | 0.43±0.00 a | 4.45±0.05 b | 0.64±0.01 bc | 2.58±0.04 b | 1.77±0.03 a | 0.54±0.01 a |
朵形 | 0.74±0.00 b | 0.77±0.01 b | 0.44±0.01 a | 4.43±0.07 b | 0.64±0.00 b | 2.55±0.05 bc | 1.80±0.04 a | 0.54±0.01 a |
凤形 | 0.77±0.02 ab | 0.81±0.01 a | 0.43±0.01 a | 4.42±0.20 b | 0.62±0.01 c | 2.52±0.01 bc | 1.78±0.05 a | 0.53±0.00 a |
扁形 | 0.74±0.00 b | 0.76±0.00 b | 0.43±0.01 a | 4.34±0.03 b | 0.63±0.00 bc | 2.46±0.02 c | 1.75±0.01 a | 0.51±0.00 b |
条形 | 0.78±0.01 a | 0.81±0.01 a | 0.43±0.01 a | 4.79±0.05 a | 0.69±0.01 a | 2.71±0.02 a | 1.84±0.03 a | 0.55±0.01 a |
Table 5 Content of various catechins in dried tea 单位:%
处理 | GC | EGC | C | EGCG | EC | GCG | ECG | CG |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
卷曲形 | 0.77±0.00 ab | 0.78±0.00 b | 0.43±0.00 a | 4.45±0.05 b | 0.64±0.01 bc | 2.58±0.04 b | 1.77±0.03 a | 0.54±0.01 a |
朵形 | 0.74±0.00 b | 0.77±0.01 b | 0.44±0.01 a | 4.43±0.07 b | 0.64±0.00 b | 2.55±0.05 bc | 1.80±0.04 a | 0.54±0.01 a |
凤形 | 0.77±0.02 ab | 0.81±0.01 a | 0.43±0.01 a | 4.42±0.20 b | 0.62±0.01 c | 2.52±0.01 bc | 1.78±0.05 a | 0.53±0.00 a |
扁形 | 0.74±0.00 b | 0.76±0.00 b | 0.43±0.01 a | 4.34±0.03 b | 0.63±0.00 bc | 2.46±0.02 c | 1.75±0.01 a | 0.51±0.00 b |
条形 | 0.78±0.01 a | 0.81±0.01 a | 0.43±0.01 a | 4.79±0.05 a | 0.69±0.01 a | 2.71±0.02 a | 1.84±0.03 a | 0.55±0.01 a |
[1] | 梅宇, 张朔. 2022年中国茶叶生产与内销形势分析[J]. 中国茶叶, 2023, 45(4): 25-30. |
[2] | 金晶, 刁学刚, 冯海强. 2019年浙江茶产业现状及发展趋势预测[J]. 中国茶叶, 2020, 42(3): 53-57. |
[3] | 王丽鸳, 赵容波, 成浩, 等. 叶色特异茶树品种选育现状[J]. 中国茶叶, 2020, 42(1): 15-19. |
[4] | 黄茶育种协作组. 特异优质茶树新品种“中黄1号”选育研究[J]. 中国茶叶, 2014, 36(9): 8-9,17. |
[5] | 阚君杰, 白瑞娟. ‘中黄1号’茶树在山东日照茶区移栽技术[J]. 山东林业科技, 2018, 48(6): 48-49, 51. |
[6] | 重庆市农业技术推广总站特经科. 重庆引种中黄1号、黄金芽等茶树新品种试验示范成功[J]. 植物医生, 2016, 29(5): 18. |
[7] | 虞德飞, 李传德, 刘颖. 镇江地区中黄1号、中黄2号适应性对比试验[J]. 中国茶叶, 2020, 42(10): 28-31. |
[8] | 敖存, 黄海涛, 毛宇骁, 等. 鸠16加工龙井茶的工艺[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2022, 63(2): 334-337. |
[9] | 唐贵珍. 中国典型黄茶感官品质及滋味品质成分研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2019. |
[10] | 张明露, 彭玙舒, 尹杰. 不同闷黄时间和温度对黄茶品质的影响[J]. 耕作与栽培, 2018(3): 12-14. |
[1] | SU Hang, ZHOU Guoyan, SONG Xiaofei, LI Xiaoli, YAN Liying, XIE Yang. Effect of fertilizer reduction combined with organic water-soluble fertilizer on quality and yield of greenhouse cucumber [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(1): 106-110. |
[2] | LAN Haiyan, QIU Zhongcan, DING Fei, QI Xingjiang, QIU Dongliang, ZHENG Xiliang, LIANG Senmiao, ZHANG Shuwen. Effect of greenhouse facilities on the flowering and fruit quality of Myrica rubra [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(1): 115-119. |
[3] | LI Ronghui, WANG Danying, CHU Guang. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer management on yield, nitrogen use efficiency and grain quality of high-quality hybrid rice variety Huazheyou 210 [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(1): 20-24. |
[4] | ZHU Kai, ZHANG Qunxiang. Study on the impact of network social interaction on risk perception of agricultural product quality and safety [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(1): 267-273. |
[5] | YAN Jiaqi, HONG Leidong, FANG Yuxian, WANG Meiyun, HONG Chunlai, YAO Yanlai. Effects of replacing chemical fertilizers with organic fertilizers on soil properties, yield and quality of Ipomoea batatas [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(1): 57-61. |
[6] | ZHOU Weiyu, KONG Guanghui, ZHANG Guanghai, ZHAO Gaokun, WU Yuping, LI Wei, LI Yongping, YAO Heng, WANG Na. Effects of different peanut organic fertilizers on the yield, quality, and soil physicochemical properties of Yunxue 38 [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(1): 72-78. |
[7] | LIU Jianjun, CAO Anquan, PENG Jiuhua, WANG Lixiang, CHEN Heqing, YANG Zaijun, ZHANG Fengshou, XUE Gang. Effects of microbial agents on soil microorganisms and yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(1): 79-85. |
[8] | WANG Jianjun, SONG Jian, CUI Yongtao, FAN Honghuan, TANG Liqun. Breeding and cultivation techniques of super-high yield, high-quality and early-maturity indica-japonica hybrid rice Zheyou 915 [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(9): 2014-2018. |
[9] | LIU Guoxia, WANG Shaomei, XU Fangzheng, CHENG Tingming, MAO Dongping, ZHANG Guangyu, GENG Ruimei, JIANG Caihong, ZHU Qifa. Research on ecological adaptability positioning and screening of high quality flue-cured tobacco varieties (lines) in Southern Anhui [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(9): 2075-2085. |
[10] | ZHENG Xiliang, SUN Li, QI Xingjiang, LIANG Senmiao, YU Zheping, ZHANG Qi, ZHANG Shuwen. Correlation analysis between fruit quality indicators and soil fertility factors in Chinese bayberry [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(9): 2112-2118. |
[11] | YANG Jianqiang, GAO Jiarui, LIU Chaochao, WANG Qiaoling. Effects of different dosages of soil conditioner on the growth of Puccinellia tenuiflora and soil nutrients [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(9): 2138-2142. |
[12] | LIU Yuhong, CHEN Liping, XU Mingfei, YE Jueyu, SUN Caixia. Investigation and analysis of the quality indicators for Wencheng waxy yam [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(9): 2174-2178. |
[13] | FENG Renfang, WU Shaohui, LAN Liuxin. Study on the effect of water-soluble fertilizer on the quality of early-maturing Citrus unshiu Marc. cv. Miyagawa Wase [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(8): 1776-1780. |
[14] | ZHANG Yubo, ZHANG Chengyi, LI Si, HE Yong, HE Yongchoulin, HU Meihua. Preliminary report of six new strawberry varieties planted in greenhouses in Fenghua District, Ningbo City [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(8): 1781-1785. |
[15] | WEI Jiafeng, MA Xinyuan, ZHANG Ruiping. Effects of different application amount of silicon fertilizer on growth and fruit quality of apple [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(8): 1814-1820. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||