Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2025, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (2): 329-335.DOI: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20231033
Previous Articles Next Articles
SUN Xiaowei1(
), YAO Jian1, WANG Jing1, HE Bing1, ZHANG Xingbo1, LI Jianhua1, XUE Gang2,*()
Received:2023-10-25
Online:2025-02-11
Published:2025-03-24
CLC Number:
SUN Xiaowei, YAO Jian, WANG Jing, HE Bing, ZHANG Xingbo, LI Jianhua, XUE Gang. Study on tobacco-based crop rotation and intercropping mode in Xuchang tobacco area[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(2): 329-335.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnykx.cn/EN/10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20231033
| 作物 | 处理 | 有机质含量/ (g·kg-1) | 全氮含量/ (g·kg-1) | 碱解氮含量/ (mg·kg-1) | 有效磷含量/ (mg·kg-1) | 速效钾含量/ (mg·kg-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 白菜 | T1 | 12.85 | 0.79 | 97.65 | 15.77 | 94.26 |
| T2 | — | — | — | — | — | |
| T3 | — | — | — | — | — | |
| T4 | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 小麦 | T1 | 12.63 | 0.83 | 97.78 | 15.75 | 92.05 |
| T2 | 12.81 | 0.81 | 98.05 | 15.82 | 94.85 | |
| T3 | — | — | — | — | — | |
| T4 | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 大麦 | T1 | — | — | — | — | — |
| T2 | — | — | — | — | — | |
| T3 | 12.83 | 0.80 | 98.12 | 15.85 | 94.88 | |
| T4 | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 油菜 | T1 | — | — | — | — | — |
| T2 | — | — | — | — | — | |
| T3 | — | — | — | — | — | |
| T4 | 12.82 | 0.81 | 98.08 | 15.83 | 94.91 | |
| 烟草 | T1 | 12.96 | 0.88 | 108.36 | 15.89 | 102.68 |
| T2 | 13.15 | 0.86 | 109.25 | 16.02 | 111.84 | |
| T3 | 13.46 | 0.91 | 115.37 | 16.15 | 122.61 | |
| T4 | 13.04 | 0.84 | 109.01 | 15.95 | 110.32 |
Table 1 Soil nutrient content before fertilization in cropland with different crops
| 作物 | 处理 | 有机质含量/ (g·kg-1) | 全氮含量/ (g·kg-1) | 碱解氮含量/ (mg·kg-1) | 有效磷含量/ (mg·kg-1) | 速效钾含量/ (mg·kg-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 白菜 | T1 | 12.85 | 0.79 | 97.65 | 15.77 | 94.26 |
| T2 | — | — | — | — | — | |
| T3 | — | — | — | — | — | |
| T4 | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 小麦 | T1 | 12.63 | 0.83 | 97.78 | 15.75 | 92.05 |
| T2 | 12.81 | 0.81 | 98.05 | 15.82 | 94.85 | |
| T3 | — | — | — | — | — | |
| T4 | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 大麦 | T1 | — | — | — | — | — |
| T2 | — | — | — | — | — | |
| T3 | 12.83 | 0.80 | 98.12 | 15.85 | 94.88 | |
| T4 | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 油菜 | T1 | — | — | — | — | — |
| T2 | — | — | — | — | — | |
| T3 | — | — | — | — | — | |
| T4 | 12.82 | 0.81 | 98.08 | 15.83 | 94.91 | |
| 烟草 | T1 | 12.96 | 0.88 | 108.36 | 15.89 | 102.68 |
| T2 | 13.15 | 0.86 | 109.25 | 16.02 | 111.84 | |
| T3 | 13.46 | 0.91 | 115.37 | 16.15 | 122.61 | |
| T4 | 13.04 | 0.84 | 109.01 | 15.95 | 110.32 |
| 处理 | 株高/ cm | 茎围/ cm | 节距/ cm | 叶片数 | 最大 叶长/cm | 最大 叶宽/cm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | 158.96 | 13.25 | 8.56 | 25.32 | 67.89 | 36.52 |
| T2 | 165.24 | 14.13 | 8.86 | 26.59 | 69.35 | 38.61 |
| T3 | 176.87 | 16.57 | 9.02 | 27.84 | 71.58 | 40.58 |
| T4 | 155.34 | 12.27 | 8.31 | 24.57 | 67.12 | 35.64 |
Table 2 Agronomic traits of flue-cured tobacco under different cropping patterns
| 处理 | 株高/ cm | 茎围/ cm | 节距/ cm | 叶片数 | 最大 叶长/cm | 最大 叶宽/cm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | 158.96 | 13.25 | 8.56 | 25.32 | 67.89 | 36.52 |
| T2 | 165.24 | 14.13 | 8.86 | 26.59 | 69.35 | 38.61 |
| T3 | 176.87 | 16.57 | 9.02 | 27.84 | 71.58 | 40.58 |
| T4 | 155.34 | 12.27 | 8.31 | 24.57 | 67.12 | 35.64 |
| 处理 | 30 d | 60 d | 90 d | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 花叶病/ % | 黑胫病/ % | 花叶病/ % | 黑胫病/ % | 花叶病/ % | 黑胫病/ % | |
| T1 | 2.58 | 6.94 | 8.54 | 18.26 | 12.58 | 25.36 |
| T2 | 1.23 | 5.87 | 3.91 | 16.45 | 6.95 | 22.51 |
| T3 | 8.69 | 3.25 | 28.36 | 11.63 | 35.68 | 13.84 |
| T4 | 5.58 | 4.65 | 14.56 | 12.58 | 18.63 | 16.65 |
Table 3 Tobacco diseases under different cropping patterns
| 处理 | 30 d | 60 d | 90 d | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 花叶病/ % | 黑胫病/ % | 花叶病/ % | 黑胫病/ % | 花叶病/ % | 黑胫病/ % | |
| T1 | 2.58 | 6.94 | 8.54 | 18.26 | 12.58 | 25.36 |
| T2 | 1.23 | 5.87 | 3.91 | 16.45 | 6.95 | 22.51 |
| T3 | 8.69 | 3.25 | 28.36 | 11.63 | 35.68 | 13.84 |
| T4 | 5.58 | 4.65 | 14.56 | 12.58 | 18.63 | 16.65 |
| 处理 | 作物种类 | 667 m2产量/kg | 均价/(元·kg-1) | 667 m2产值/元 | 上六片比例/% | 上等烟比例/% | 中等烟比例/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | 白菜 | 6 000.00 | 0.60 | 3 600.00 | — | — | — |
| 小麦 | 450.00 | 3.16 | 1 422.00 | — | — | ||
| 烟叶 | 240.00 | 28.00 | 6 720.00 | 0 | 68.00 | ||
| T2 | 小麦 | 550.00 | 3.16 | 1 738.00 | — | — | — |
| 烟叶 | 258.60 | 28.50 | 7 370.10 | 0 | 69.50 | ||
| T3 | 烟叶 | 260.00 | 32.00 | 8 320.00 | 15.00 | 60.00 | 32.00 |
| T4 | 油菜 | 175.00 | 6.60 | 1 155.00 | — | — | 25.00 |
| 烟叶 | 275.50 | 31.50 | 8 678.25 | 14.80 | 62.50 | — |
Table 4 Income and tobacco grade for different cropping patterns
| 处理 | 作物种类 | 667 m2产量/kg | 均价/(元·kg-1) | 667 m2产值/元 | 上六片比例/% | 上等烟比例/% | 中等烟比例/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | 白菜 | 6 000.00 | 0.60 | 3 600.00 | — | — | — |
| 小麦 | 450.00 | 3.16 | 1 422.00 | — | — | ||
| 烟叶 | 240.00 | 28.00 | 6 720.00 | 0 | 68.00 | ||
| T2 | 小麦 | 550.00 | 3.16 | 1 738.00 | — | — | — |
| 烟叶 | 258.60 | 28.50 | 7 370.10 | 0 | 69.50 | ||
| T3 | 烟叶 | 260.00 | 32.00 | 8 320.00 | 15.00 | 60.00 | 32.00 |
| T4 | 油菜 | 175.00 | 6.60 | 1 155.00 | — | — | 25.00 |
| 烟叶 | 275.50 | 31.50 | 8 678.25 | 14.80 | 62.50 | — |
| 作物种类 | 种子(苗)/元 | 肥料/元 | 农药/元 | 用工/元 | 共计/元 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 白菜 | 90.00 | 400.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 690.00 |
| 小麦/大麦 | 105.00 | 300.00 | 60.00 | 150.00 | 615.00 |
| 油菜 | 30.00 | 200.00 | 40.00 | 100.00 | 370.00 |
| 烟草 | 70.00 | 334.00 | 200.00 | 1 705.00 | 2 309.00 |
Table 5 Cost of 667 m2 for different cropping patterns
| 作物种类 | 种子(苗)/元 | 肥料/元 | 农药/元 | 用工/元 | 共计/元 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 白菜 | 90.00 | 400.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 690.00 |
| 小麦/大麦 | 105.00 | 300.00 | 60.00 | 150.00 | 615.00 |
| 油菜 | 30.00 | 200.00 | 40.00 | 100.00 | 370.00 |
| 烟草 | 70.00 | 334.00 | 200.00 | 1 705.00 | 2 309.00 |
| 处理 | 烟农667 m2成本/元 | 667 m2地租/元 | 667 m2烟农收入/元 | 烟农667 m2收益/元 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | 3 614.00 | 800.00 | 11 742.00 | 7 328.00 |
| T2 | 2 924.00 | 800.00 | 9 108.10 | 5 384.10 |
| T3 | 2 924.00 | 800.00 | 8 320.00 | 4 596.00 |
| T4 | 2 679.00 | 800.00 | 9 833.25 | 6 354.25 |
Table 6 Benefits of different cropping patterns
| 处理 | 烟农667 m2成本/元 | 667 m2地租/元 | 667 m2烟农收入/元 | 烟农667 m2收益/元 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | 3 614.00 | 800.00 | 11 742.00 | 7 328.00 |
| T2 | 2 924.00 | 800.00 | 9 108.10 | 5 384.10 |
| T3 | 2 924.00 | 800.00 | 8 320.00 | 4 596.00 |
| T4 | 2 679.00 | 800.00 | 9 833.25 | 6 354.25 |
| 处理 | 颜色 | 成熟度 | 叶片结构 | 身份 | 油分 | 色度 | 组织特征 | 柔韧度 | 光泽度 | 总分 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | 8.00 | 8.00 | 7.50 | 8.00 | 5.50 | 5.50 | 5.50 | 5.50 | 5.50 | 7.03 |
| T2 | 8.00 | 8.00 | 7.50 | 7.50 | 5.50 | 5.50 | 5.50 | 5.50 | 5.50 | 6.93 |
| T3 | 8.00 | 7.50 | 7.50 | 7.50 | 5.50 | 5.50 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 6.78 |
| T4 | 8.00 | 7.50 | 7.00 | 7.00 | 5.50 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 6.53 |
Table 7 Appearance quality of middle flue-cured tobacco leaves under different cropping patterns
| 处理 | 颜色 | 成熟度 | 叶片结构 | 身份 | 油分 | 色度 | 组织特征 | 柔韧度 | 光泽度 | 总分 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | 8.00 | 8.00 | 7.50 | 8.00 | 5.50 | 5.50 | 5.50 | 5.50 | 5.50 | 7.03 |
| T2 | 8.00 | 8.00 | 7.50 | 7.50 | 5.50 | 5.50 | 5.50 | 5.50 | 5.50 | 6.93 |
| T3 | 8.00 | 7.50 | 7.50 | 7.50 | 5.50 | 5.50 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 6.78 |
| T4 | 8.00 | 7.50 | 7.00 | 7.00 | 5.50 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 6.53 |
| 处理 | 总糖 含量/% | 还原糖 含量/% | 烟碱 含量/% | 总氮 含量/% | 钾含量/ % | 氯含量/ % | 两糖比 | 糖碱比 | 氮碱比 | 钾氯比 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | 25.38 a | 23.70 a | 2.27 b | 2.02 c | 1.03 b | 0.79 b | 0.93 a | 10.42 a | 0.89 b | 1.30 b |
| T2 | 22.98 bc | 21.50 b | 2.66 a | 2.47 a | 0.90 bc | 0.98 a | 0.94 a | 8.10 c | 0.93 a | 0.92 bc |
| T3 | 23.21 b | 22.00 ab | 2.34 b | 2.16 b | 1.57 a | 0.61 c | 0.95 a | 9.39 b | 0.92 ab | 2.57 a |
| T4 | 21.24 c | 19.97 c | 2.73 a | 2.44 a | 0.84 c | 1.08 a | 0.94 a | 7.32 d | 0.90 ab | 0.78 c |
Table 8 Conventional chemical compositions and coordination of middle flue-cured tobacco leaves under different cropping patterns
| 处理 | 总糖 含量/% | 还原糖 含量/% | 烟碱 含量/% | 总氮 含量/% | 钾含量/ % | 氯含量/ % | 两糖比 | 糖碱比 | 氮碱比 | 钾氯比 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | 25.38 a | 23.70 a | 2.27 b | 2.02 c | 1.03 b | 0.79 b | 0.93 a | 10.42 a | 0.89 b | 1.30 b |
| T2 | 22.98 bc | 21.50 b | 2.66 a | 2.47 a | 0.90 bc | 0.98 a | 0.94 a | 8.10 c | 0.93 a | 0.92 bc |
| T3 | 23.21 b | 22.00 ab | 2.34 b | 2.16 b | 1.57 a | 0.61 c | 0.95 a | 9.39 b | 0.92 ab | 2.57 a |
| T4 | 21.24 c | 19.97 c | 2.73 a | 2.44 a | 0.84 c | 1.08 a | 0.94 a | 7.32 d | 0.90 ab | 0.78 c |
| 处理 | 香气质 | 香气量 | 浓度 | 柔细度 | 余味 | 杂气 | 刺激性 | 劲头 | 燃烧性 | 灰色 | 总分 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | 6.50 | 6.50 | 5.50 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.50 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 63.50 |
| T2 | 6.50 | 6.50 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 62.20 |
| T3 | 6.50 | 6.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 4.50 | 4.50 | 4.50 | 5.00 | 4.50 | 60.00 |
| T4 | 6.00 | 6.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 4.50 | 4.50 | 5.00 | 4.50 | 5.00 | 4.50 | 58.50 |
Table 9 Sensory quality of middle flue-cured tobacco leaves under different cropping patterns
| 处理 | 香气质 | 香气量 | 浓度 | 柔细度 | 余味 | 杂气 | 刺激性 | 劲头 | 燃烧性 | 灰色 | 总分 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | 6.50 | 6.50 | 5.50 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.50 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 63.50 |
| T2 | 6.50 | 6.50 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 62.20 |
| T3 | 6.50 | 6.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 4.50 | 4.50 | 4.50 | 5.00 | 4.50 | 60.00 |
| T4 | 6.00 | 6.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 4.50 | 4.50 | 5.00 | 4.50 | 5.00 | 4.50 | 58.50 |
| [1] | 吴玉红, 王吕, 崔月贞, 等. 轮作模式及秸秆还田对水稻产量、稻米品质及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2021, 27(11): 1926-1937. |
| [2] | 孟宇辉, 金文俊, 董召荣, 等. 江淮地区不同水旱轮作模式的资源利用效率与经济效益比较[J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(11): 3357-3365. |
| [3] | 张鹏, 钟川, 周泉, 等. 不同冬种模式对稻田土壤碳库管理指数的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2019, 27(8): 1163-1171. |
| [4] | 彭云, 赵正雄, 李忠环, 等. 不同前茬对烤烟生长、产量和质量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2010, 36(2): 335-340. |
| [5] | 刘优雄, 周冀衡, 邓小刚, 等. 不同前作土壤对烤烟生长和化学成分影响的研究[J]. 作物研究, 2010, 24(3): 173-177. |
| [6] | 晋艳, 杨宇虹, 段玉琪, 等. 烤烟轮作、连作对烟叶产量质量的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2004, 17(S1): 267-271. |
| [7] | 何俊瑜, 陈博, 任艳芳, 等. 连作对烤烟根际与非根际土壤养分含量的影响[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 39(6): 585-590. |
| [8] | 李洪斌, 张杨珠, 廖超林, 等. 烟稻轮作下烤烟的施肥及养分吸收效应[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 38(6): 656-661. |
| [9] | 杨扬, 赵润野, 许明晓. 烟草作物布局及烟草轮作制度研究[J]. 种子科技, 2017, 35(6): 68-69. |
| [10] | 苟小梅, 曾兴鑫, 张毅, 等. 烤烟油菜轮作与施肥对植烟土壤磷素含量及有效性的影响[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2019, 37(4): 452-458. |
| [11] | 王家顺, 李志友, 陆引罡. 不同轮作方式对烤烟生长发育和品质的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2015, 44(9): 25-27, 31. |
| [12] | 刘浩, 周冀衡, 张毅, 等. 不同土壤类型前茬作物对烤烟化学成分和品质的影响[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 41(5): 491-495. |
| [13] | 张汉球. 麦烟套种综合利用研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2010, 38(30): 16840-16841. |
| [14] | 贾志红, 易建华, 苏以荣, 等. 烟区轮作与连作土壤细菌群落多样性比较[J]. 生态环境学报, 2010, 19(7): 1578-1585. |
| [15] | 方树民, 唐莉娜, 陈顺辉, 等. 作物轮作对土壤中烟草青枯菌数量及发病的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2011, 19(2): 377-382. |
| [16] | 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000. |
| [17] | 赵炯平, 邓小华, 江智敏, 等. 不同绿肥翻压还土后植烟土壤主要养分动态变化[J]. 作物研究, 2015, 29(2): 161-165. |
| [18] | 廖恒, 况胜剑, 王文华, 等. 烤烟绿肥的研究进展[J]. 农技服务, 2021, 38(10): 62-66. |
| [19] | 蔡兴宏. 烟草良繁田绿肥种植技术[J]. 北京农业, 2015(14): 71. |
| [20] | 代勇, 尹乐, 代先强. 绿肥翻压对植烟土壤养分状况的影响[J]. 南方农业, 2020, 14(17): 191-192. |
| [21] | 李集勤, 黄振瑞, 杨少海, 等. 八种绿肥对土壤营养和烤烟产质量的影响[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2020, 41(6): 24-29. |
| [22] | 查宏波, 赵芳, 陶永萍, 等. 绿肥翻压还田对连作烟地烤烟农艺性状、经济性状和化学成分的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2019, 58(6): 101-103. |
| [23] | 吴青, 张振臣, 林松, 等. 麦烟套种防治烟草花叶病试验研究[J]. 河南农业科学, 1991(6): 16-19. |
| [24] | 刘华. 植烟土壤改良和保护技术研究[J]. 植物医生, 2009, 22(5): 42-44. |
| [25] | 刘国顺, 李正, 敬海霞, 等. 连年翻压绿肥对植烟土壤微生物量及酶活性的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2010, 16(6): 1472-1478. |
| [26] | 闫洪洋, 马宇, 王少峰. 黑麦草对烤烟的掩青效应研究[J]. 江西农业学报, 2008, 20(7): 110-111. |
| [27] | 任杰, 刘新民, 冯长春, 等. 凉山促进烟农增收种植模式调查分析[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2019, 40(4): 84-91. |
| [1] | ZU Ruochuan, WANG Jingbo. Effects of chemical fertilizer reduction on soil fertility, rice yield and nitrogen and phosphorus nutrient uptake in Tai Lake region [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(2): 293-297. |
| [2] | LI Qingxiang, TIAN Yunong, BI Yiming, MEI Gaofu. Present situation and suggestions on pesticide registration of tobacco bacterial diseases in China [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(2): 405-410. |
| [3] | HE Xiaobing, HUANG Kunpeng, LI Junying, BU Yating, ZHAO Lang, WANG Mingxin, ZHANG Fusheng, YIN Guangyu, YANG Nan, XU Yueqi. Structure and diversity of microbial community in rhizosphere soil of tobacco root rot caused by Fusarium [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(2): 411-420. |
| [4] | CHEN Jie, CAO Kuirong, WANG Baojun, JIANG Qifan. Effects of rice-crayfish co-cultivation on rice diseases and pests control and rice quality [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(2): 483-486. |
| [5] | WANG Jiali, MA Yan, GAO Qian, LU Zhaojun, ZHANG Jianmei, WANG Lianhong, WANG Wenping. Overview of active components and applications of plant derived fungicides in China [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(1): 138-145. |
| [6] | WU Bo, ZHANG Guoyong, ZHAO Yan, MA Wufei, ZHOU Xuanlun. Application of the “detection and elimination method” in the purification of animal diseases in large-scale pig farms in Wenzhou [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(1): 197-200. |
| [7] | GUO Xinsong, LIU Tongxin, HONG Pizheng, GAO Han, JING Jiyue, DING Fangjun. Effects of organic substance composting inoculants under straw returning on wheat yield and soil chemical characteristics [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(1): 44-50. |
| [8] | LIU Jianjun, CAO Anquan, PENG Jiuhua, WANG Lixiang, CHEN Heqing, YANG Zaijun, ZHANG Fengshou, XUE Gang. Effects of microbial agents on soil microorganisms and yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(1): 79-85. |
| [9] | XU Yan, ZHANG Quanfeng, FENG Yucao, XIAO Jiarui, SUN Yiming, FENG Yufei. Breeding of rape variety Zhenongyou 12 with high oil content, disease resistance and cold tolerance [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(9): 2064-2068. |
| [10] | LIU Guoxia, WANG Shaomei, XU Fangzheng, CHENG Tingming, MAO Dongping, ZHANG Guangyu, GENG Ruimei, JIANG Caihong, ZHU Qifa. Research on ecological adaptability positioning and screening of high quality flue-cured tobacco varieties (lines) in Southern Anhui [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(9): 2075-2085. |
| [11] | YANG Jianqiang, GAO Jiarui, LIU Chaochao, WANG Qiaoling. Effects of different dosages of soil conditioner on the growth of Puccinellia tenuiflora and soil nutrients [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(9): 2138-2142. |
| [12] | WEN Wei, PAN Jianqing, YU Bo, XIE Jing, MA Junwei, YANG Yan, WANG Feng. Study on the application effect of the main acidification management model for grape cultivated land in Changxing County [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(8): 1838-1842. |
| [13] | JIANG Liming, CHEN Yijie, YUAN Xiufang, LI Junxing. Isolation, virulence gene identification, and antimicrobial resistance analysis of hybrid enterotoxigenic and Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (ETEC/STEC) strain from pigs [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(8): 1939-1943. |
| [14] | SUN Yuxiao, TIAN Jianwei, YANG Haizhou, LIU Yan, NIE Bin, ZHANG Ningxin, WANG Gang, YIN Zhongchun, PENG Wuxing. Effects of partial replacement of chemical nitrogen with organic nitrogen on the yield, quality, and chemical composition of flue-cured tobacco [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(6): 1340-1345. |
| [15] | CAI Yi, YANG Jian, YANG Yang, CHENG Zhimin, XIE Bing, TANG Ming, YANG Yide, YAN Min. Comprehensive evaluation of new flue-cured tobacco varieties in Yibin [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(6): 1346-1350. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
