Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2025, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (2): 457-462.DOI: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20231099
Previous Articles Next Articles
SHAO Juan1(), JIANG Ting1, WANG Xiaodong1,2, ZHU Xiangdong3, ZHANG Tao3
Received:
2023-11-10
Online:
2025-02-11
Published:
2025-03-24
CLC Number:
SHAO Juan, JIANG Ting, WANG Xiaodong, ZHU Xiangdong, ZHANG Tao. Effect of phenolic extracts from Chuzhou chrysanthemum on delaying aging of rice during storage period[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(2): 457-462.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnykx.cn/EN/10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20231099
滁菊提取物浓度/% | 大米硬度/g | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 d | 40 d | 80 d | 120 d | 160 d | |
0 | 880.5±1.3 a A | 982.9±2.0 a B | 1 004.8±6.3 a C | 1 026.3±8.4 a D | 1 042.1±2.0 a E |
0.02 | 877.1±5.4 a A | 973.2±7.0 a B | 987.9±4.5 b C | 1 002.3±2.6 b D | 1 025.8±2.1 b E |
0.04 | 870.9±3.1 a A | 946.8±7.9 b B | 971.3±2.6 c C | 993.3±8.1 b D | 1 009.2±1.6 c E |
0.06 | 878.0±20.1 a A | 919.8±13.1 c B | 936.9±8.9 d C | 952.1±6.0 c D | 980.9±3.4 d E |
0.08 | 879.4±9.8 a A | 902.3±2.7 cd B | 918.4±2.8 e C | 938.4±6.8 d D | 965.0±2.5 e E |
0.10 | 868.8±4.9 a A | 887.3±9.8 d B | 904.1±1.7 f C | 929.7±8.3 e D | 950.2±8.4 f E |
Table 1 Effect of different concentrations of phenolic extract from Chuzhou chrysanthemum on rice hardness at different time
滁菊提取物浓度/% | 大米硬度/g | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 d | 40 d | 80 d | 120 d | 160 d | |
0 | 880.5±1.3 a A | 982.9±2.0 a B | 1 004.8±6.3 a C | 1 026.3±8.4 a D | 1 042.1±2.0 a E |
0.02 | 877.1±5.4 a A | 973.2±7.0 a B | 987.9±4.5 b C | 1 002.3±2.6 b D | 1 025.8±2.1 b E |
0.04 | 870.9±3.1 a A | 946.8±7.9 b B | 971.3±2.6 c C | 993.3±8.1 b D | 1 009.2±1.6 c E |
0.06 | 878.0±20.1 a A | 919.8±13.1 c B | 936.9±8.9 d C | 952.1±6.0 c D | 980.9±3.4 d E |
0.08 | 879.4±9.8 a A | 902.3±2.7 cd B | 918.4±2.8 e C | 938.4±6.8 d D | 965.0±2.5 e E |
0.10 | 868.8±4.9 a A | 887.3±9.8 d B | 904.1±1.7 f C | 929.7±8.3 e D | 950.2±8.4 f E |
滁菊提取物浓度/% | 米饭弹性 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 d | 40 d | 80 d | 120 d | 160 d | |
0 | 0.79±0.18 a E | 0.73±0.02 d D | 0.64±0.08 e C | 0.53±0.03 e B | 0.42±0.01 e A |
0.02 | 0.77±0.25 a E | 0.74±0.07 cd D | 0.67±0.03 d C | 0.54±0.04 e B | 0.43±0.04 e A |
0.04 | 0.79±0.21 a D | 0.77±0.11 bc C | 0.71±0.04 c B | 0.58±0.03 d A | 0.47±0.03 d A |
0.06 | 0.77±0.11 a D | 0.75±0.08 ab C | 0.70±0.07 c B | 0.59±0.02 c A | 0.52±0.02 c A |
0.08 | 0.78±0.08 a E | 0.77±0.02 ab D | 0.72±0.04 b C | 0.66±0.09 b B | 0.60±0.08 b A |
0.10 | 0.78±0.01 a D | 0.78±0.06 a C | 0.74±0.05 a B | 0.69±0.03 a A | 0.63±0.05 a A |
Table 2 Effect of different concentrations of phenolic extract from Chuzhou chrysanthemum on rice elasticity at different time
滁菊提取物浓度/% | 米饭弹性 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 d | 40 d | 80 d | 120 d | 160 d | |
0 | 0.79±0.18 a E | 0.73±0.02 d D | 0.64±0.08 e C | 0.53±0.03 e B | 0.42±0.01 e A |
0.02 | 0.77±0.25 a E | 0.74±0.07 cd D | 0.67±0.03 d C | 0.54±0.04 e B | 0.43±0.04 e A |
0.04 | 0.79±0.21 a D | 0.77±0.11 bc C | 0.71±0.04 c B | 0.58±0.03 d A | 0.47±0.03 d A |
0.06 | 0.77±0.11 a D | 0.75±0.08 ab C | 0.70±0.07 c B | 0.59±0.02 c A | 0.52±0.02 c A |
0.08 | 0.78±0.08 a E | 0.77±0.02 ab D | 0.72±0.04 b C | 0.66±0.09 b B | 0.60±0.08 b A |
0.10 | 0.78±0.01 a D | 0.78±0.06 a C | 0.74±0.05 a B | 0.69±0.03 a A | 0.63±0.05 a A |
滁菊提取物浓度/% | 咀嚼性/g | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 d | 40 d | 80 d | 120 d | 160 d | |
0 | 174.5±1.55 a D | 192.8±0.84 a C | 208.9±2.12 a B | 217.4±2.89 a A | 218.8±0.63 a A |
0.02 | 173.9±6.21 a D | 190.7±1.35 ab C | 205.0±3.26 a B | 211.4±1.49 b B | 214.8±3.98 ab A |
0.04 | 171.3±2.77 a E | 190.5±2.92 ab D | 201.1±0.38 b C | 206.8±3.56 bc B | 210.2±0.33 b A |
0.06 | 174.2±2.48 a E | 187.5±1.16 ab D | 196.4±2.77 b C | 203.9±0.63 bc B | 211.5±2.58 b A |
0.08 | 176.7±4.13 a E | 185.1±2.26 b D | 197.0±3.39 b C | 202.1±4.03 c B | 204.1±0.89 c A |
0.10 | 175.1±0.25 a E | 183.68±1.42 c D | 187.9±2.39 c C | 192.3±2.75 d B | 198.5±1.62 d A |
Table 3 Effect of different concentrations of phenolic extract from Chuzhou chrysanthemum on rice chewability at different time
滁菊提取物浓度/% | 咀嚼性/g | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 d | 40 d | 80 d | 120 d | 160 d | |
0 | 174.5±1.55 a D | 192.8±0.84 a C | 208.9±2.12 a B | 217.4±2.89 a A | 218.8±0.63 a A |
0.02 | 173.9±6.21 a D | 190.7±1.35 ab C | 205.0±3.26 a B | 211.4±1.49 b B | 214.8±3.98 ab A |
0.04 | 171.3±2.77 a E | 190.5±2.92 ab D | 201.1±0.38 b C | 206.8±3.56 bc B | 210.2±0.33 b A |
0.06 | 174.2±2.48 a E | 187.5±1.16 ab D | 196.4±2.77 b C | 203.9±0.63 bc B | 211.5±2.58 b A |
0.08 | 176.7±4.13 a E | 185.1±2.26 b D | 197.0±3.39 b C | 202.1±4.03 c B | 204.1±0.89 c A |
0.10 | 175.1±0.25 a E | 183.68±1.42 c D | 187.9±2.39 c C | 192.3±2.75 d B | 198.5±1.62 d A |
滁菊提取物 浓度/% | 脂肪酸含量/(mg·kg-1) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 d | 40 d | 80 d | 120 d | 160 d | |
0 | 1.63 a E | 1.75 a D | 2.05 a C | 2.15 a B | 2.22 a A |
0.02 | 1.63 a C | 1.68 b C | 1.96 b B | 2.06 b B | 2.19 b A |
0.04 | 1.65 a D | 1.66 bc D | 1.85 c C | 1.93 c B | 2.12 c A |
0.06 | 1.63 a E | 1.66 bc D | 1.75 d C | 1.83 d B | 2.07 d A |
0.08 | 1.64 a D | 1.65 bc D | 1.70 de C | 1.77 eB | 1.95 e A |
0.10 | 1.63 a D | 1.64 c D | 1.68 e C | 1.72 f B | 1.84 f A |
Table 4 Effect of different concentrations of phenolic extract from Chuzhou chrysanthemum on rice fatty acid content at different time
滁菊提取物 浓度/% | 脂肪酸含量/(mg·kg-1) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 d | 40 d | 80 d | 120 d | 160 d | |
0 | 1.63 a E | 1.75 a D | 2.05 a C | 2.15 a B | 2.22 a A |
0.02 | 1.63 a C | 1.68 b C | 1.96 b B | 2.06 b B | 2.19 b A |
0.04 | 1.65 a D | 1.66 bc D | 1.85 c C | 1.93 c B | 2.12 c A |
0.06 | 1.63 a E | 1.66 bc D | 1.75 d C | 1.83 d B | 2.07 d A |
0.08 | 1.64 a D | 1.65 bc D | 1.70 de C | 1.77 eB | 1.95 e A |
0.10 | 1.63 a D | 1.64 c D | 1.68 e C | 1.72 f B | 1.84 f A |
滁菊提取物浓度/% | 淀粉溶解度/% | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 d | 40 d | 80 d | 120 d | 160 d | |
0 | 22.8±0.919 a A | 24.6±0.424 c B | 26.3±0.141 e C | 27.7±0.141 f D | 29.4±0.141 e E |
0.02 | 23.0±0.212 a A | 25.1±0.071 b B | 27.7±0.071 d C | 28.8±0.141 e D | 30.4±0.495 d E |
0.04 | 22.6±1.061 a A | 25.4±0.141 b B | 28.3±0.141 c C | 29.4±0.070 d D | 31.3±0.071 c E |
0.06 | 22.7±0.495 a A | 25.2±0.141 b B | 30.3±0.283 b C | 32.6±0.205 c D | 33.6±0.212 b E |
0.08 | 21.9±0.707 a A | 26.3±0.141 a B | 32.3±0.283 a C | 33.1±0.070 b D | 33.4±0.141 b E |
0.10 | 22.3±0.778 a A | 26.2±1.458 a B | 32.6±2.416 a C | 34.6±0.354 a D | 35.6±0.141 a D |
Table 5 Effect of different concentrations of phenolic extract from Chuzhou chrysanthemum on rice starch solubility at different time
滁菊提取物浓度/% | 淀粉溶解度/% | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 d | 40 d | 80 d | 120 d | 160 d | |
0 | 22.8±0.919 a A | 24.6±0.424 c B | 26.3±0.141 e C | 27.7±0.141 f D | 29.4±0.141 e E |
0.02 | 23.0±0.212 a A | 25.1±0.071 b B | 27.7±0.071 d C | 28.8±0.141 e D | 30.4±0.495 d E |
0.04 | 22.6±1.061 a A | 25.4±0.141 b B | 28.3±0.141 c C | 29.4±0.070 d D | 31.3±0.071 c E |
0.06 | 22.7±0.495 a A | 25.2±0.141 b B | 30.3±0.283 b C | 32.6±0.205 c D | 33.6±0.212 b E |
0.08 | 21.9±0.707 a A | 26.3±0.141 a B | 32.3±0.283 a C | 33.1±0.070 b D | 33.4±0.141 b E |
0.10 | 22.3±0.778 a A | 26.2±1.458 a B | 32.6±2.416 a C | 34.6±0.354 a D | 35.6±0.141 a D |
滁菊提取物浓度/% | 淀粉膨胀度/% | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 d | 40 d | 80 d | 120 d | 160 d | |
0 | 17.0±0.354 a A | 16.1±0.071 a B | 15.4±0.354 a C | 12.5±0.212 a D | 10.4±0.141 a E |
0.02 | 16.9±1.202 a A | 15.8±0.141 a B | 14.6±0.212 b C | 11.7±0.071 b D | 9.4±0.141 b E |
0.04 | 17.1±0.424 a A | 15.3±0.071 b B | 13.6±0.141 c C | 11.3±0.141 c D | 8.8±0.141 c E |
0.06 | 16.9±0.776 a A | 14.8±0.071 c B | 13.1±0.071 cd C | 10.8±0.071 d D | 8.1±0.212 d E |
0.08 | 16.8±0.071 a A | 14.5±0.071 c B | 12.8±0.141 d C | 10.1±0.071 e D | 7.2±0.283 e E |
0.10 | 16.8±0.424 a A | 14.1±0.283 d B | 12.2±0.071 e C | 9.3±0.212 f D | 7.1±0.212 e E |
Table 6 Effect of different concentrations of phenolic extract from Chuzhou chrysanthemum on swelling degree of rice starch at different time
滁菊提取物浓度/% | 淀粉膨胀度/% | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 d | 40 d | 80 d | 120 d | 160 d | |
0 | 17.0±0.354 a A | 16.1±0.071 a B | 15.4±0.354 a C | 12.5±0.212 a D | 10.4±0.141 a E |
0.02 | 16.9±1.202 a A | 15.8±0.141 a B | 14.6±0.212 b C | 11.7±0.071 b D | 9.4±0.141 b E |
0.04 | 17.1±0.424 a A | 15.3±0.071 b B | 13.6±0.141 c C | 11.3±0.141 c D | 8.8±0.141 c E |
0.06 | 16.9±0.776 a A | 14.8±0.071 c B | 13.1±0.071 cd C | 10.8±0.071 d D | 8.1±0.212 d E |
0.08 | 16.8±0.071 a A | 14.5±0.071 c B | 12.8±0.141 d C | 10.1±0.071 e D | 7.2±0.283 e E |
0.10 | 16.8±0.424 a A | 14.1±0.283 d B | 12.2±0.071 e C | 9.3±0.212 f D | 7.1±0.212 e E |
[1] | 蔡沙, 李森, 管骁, 等. 陈化度对大米成分和蒸煮品质的影响研究[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2022, 43(12): 9-15. |
[2] | 谢雅茜, 方智毅, 郭培俊, 等. 不同包装材料和真空度对真空包装大米脂肪酸值的影响[J]. 粮食储藏, 2016, 45(2): 31-34. |
[3] | 陈冰洁, 乔勇进, 张怡, 等. 包装材料厚度对大米贮藏品质的影响[J]. 上海农业学报, 2022, 38(2): 114-120. |
[4] | 郑海英, 范小平, 黄苇, 等. 大米的陈化与包装保鲜研究进展[J]. 粮食与油脂, 2023, 36(5): 8-12. |
[5] | 张红建, 谢更祥, 邹易, 等. 不同包装材料对大米品质的影响[J]. 粮油食品科技, 2018, 26(4): 27-30. |
[6] | 李蟠莹, 戴涛涛, 陈军, 等. 原花青素对大米淀粉老化性质的影响[J]. 食品工业科技, 2018, 39(18): 6-11. |
[7] | 韩雪琴, 黄立新, 郝娟, 等. 没食子酸与大米淀粉的相互作用[J]. 现代食品科技, 2021, 37(10): 103-111. |
[8] | 王欢, 贾强, 黄利华, 等. 红树莓多酚提取物对大米淀粉理化性质和体外消化性能的影响[J]. 食品科技, 2021, 46(9): 265-270. |
[9] | 贾雨朦, 陈芹芹, 毕金峰, 等. 滁菊的功能成分及其体外抗氧化活性[J]. 食品科学, 2019, 40(23): 66-72. |
[10] | 鲍雨婷, 孙玥, 李雪玲, 等. 滁菊粉对面团特性和面包风味及其抗氧化活性的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2023, 44(4): 107-114. |
[11] | 舒俊生, 黄桂东, 毛健. 滁菊95%乙醇提取液中黄酮类和酚酸类物质的鉴定及分离[J]. 中国食品学报, 2013, 13(4): 207-213. |
[12] | ISTRATI D, VIZIREANU C, IORDǍCHESCU G, et al. Physico-chemical characteristics and antioxidant activity of goji fruits jam and jelly during storage[J]. Annals of the University of Dunarea de Jos of Gaiati, 2013, 37(2):100-110. |
[1] | ZU Ruochuan, WANG Jingbo. Effects of chemical fertilizer reduction on soil fertility, rice yield and nitrogen and phosphorus nutrient uptake in Tai Lake region [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(2): 293-297. |
[2] | JIANG Shenyue, WANG Lifang, ZHANG Haijuan, SHAO Sainan, JIANG Huaqin, MENG Qingjiu, QIAN Yi, XUE Zhaokun, JIANG Yugen, YE Zhengqian. Study on the effect of straw mixed fertilizer on rice yield and soil fertility [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(2): 298-303. |
[3] | WANG Honghui, ZHANG Xianping, WANG Qinxia, ZHU Weijun, QIN Yebo, WANG Zhigang, JIANG Libin. Comparative study on bowl seedling machine transplanting and carpet seedling machine transplanting under different sowing dates of early rice [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(2): 304-308. |
[4] | SHEN Jianxun, QI Yongbin, WANG Linyou, CHEN Mingxiang, LYU Xiangchao, ZHANG Haodi, HUANG Huifang. Efficient high yield seed production technology of long-grain indica-japonica hybrid rice variety Zheyou 77 [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(2): 309-312. |
[5] | WENG Fei, WANG Yi, XU Naixia, LI Qingkui. Effects of spraying iron chlorine e6 at different stages on the lodging resistance of japonica rice [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(2): 313-317. |
[6] | CAO Mengjiao, YAO Zhangliang, WANG Yeqing, YE Liping, YING Chao, CHEN Yiping. Control effect of commonly used pesticides on Chilo suppressalis Walker and leaf roller borer in early rice [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(2): 421-424. |
[7] | CHEN Hong, YE Xuhao, SUN Xiaoyu, FANG Hui, TANG Xuejun. Control effect of cyproflanilide suspension on Chilo suppressalis Walker in indica-japonica hybrid rice [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(2): 425-429. |
[8] | YU Yanfang, HU Yang, HE Shijie, XU Hongle, LEI Haixia, WANG Xiaoxiao, LI Huilong, ZHU Junde. Evaluation of control effects and crop safety of six herbicides and their combinations against weeds in direct-seeded rice fields [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(2): 430-436. |
[9] | BAI Jianping, XU Weidong, LU Qiang, YAO Zhangliang. Field control effect of 40% prothioconazole·tebuconazole mixture on rice sheath blight [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(2): 437-439. |
[10] | ZHOU Dan, ZHANG Jinpeng, LIU Mei, HU Dayan, YUAN Julin, ZHOU Zhijin. Study on the effect of embedded raceway aquaculture for Micropterus salmoides in rice fields [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(2): 475-482. |
[11] | CHEN Jie, CAO Kuirong, WANG Baojun, JIANG Qifan. Effects of rice-crayfish co-cultivation on rice diseases and pests control and rice quality [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(2): 483-486. |
[12] | MENG Huabing, ZHANG Qiyan, ZHOU Jinting, SUN Li, QIN Yebo. Current situation and development suggestions of rice industry in Wuxing District [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(2): 530-535. |
[13] | LI Ronghui, WANG Danying, CHU Guang. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer management on yield, nitrogen use efficiency and grain quality of high-quality hybrid rice variety Huazheyou 210 [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(1): 20-24. |
[14] | JIANG Shenyue, XUE Zhaokun, JIANG Huaqin, MENG Qingjiu, SHAO Sainan, DIAO Zhihan, YU Keru, YE Zhengqian, JIANG Yugen. Discussion on the rapid fertilization technology for the restoration of non-grain cultivated land [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(1): 218-223. |
[15] | XIA Qiongmei, YAN Sandan, ZHUO Xiaofang, LONG Ruiping, ZHU Haiping, LI Guiyong, YANG Jiu, YANG Congdang. Analysis of the difference in indica rice yield at different altitudes in Yunnan [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(1): 25-29. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||