Effects of different full-biodegradable mulching films on greenhouse fresh peanut yield

doi:10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20240570

Abstract

Abstract:

Nine kinds of full-biodegradable mulching films were selected for the cultivation of facility fresh peanuts in early spring in Hangzhou City. The yield analysis showed that the full-biodegradable mulching films increased the yield significantly compared with the bare soil cultivation (control), and the yield of 10 μm black film was the most prominent, reaching 950.16 kg per 667 m², with an increase of 61.6% compared with the control. The production of 8 μm white film was stable in the range of 857.81-880.90 kg per 667 m², and the increase rate was 45.9%-49.8%. The yield of 6 μm white film and 10 μm films in other colors increased 28.1% on average. The economic benefit analysis showed that the profit of 10 μm black film reached 10 852.6 yuan per 667 m², and the profit of 8 μm white film reached 9 781.8 yuan. Environment investigation showed that there was no need to remove and recycle films after harvesting, so there was no residual pollution problem of mulching film. In conclusion, it is recommended to use 10 μm black and 8 μm white full-biodegradable mulching film for the cultivation of greenhouse fresh peanuts in Hangzhou in early spring.

Key words: full-biodegradable mulching film, fresh peanut, yield, economic benefit

CLC Number:

S316

XU Chuchu, LI Kunyu, WANG Huaying, SUN Shuni, SHEN Diwen, LI Feng, WU Bin, WANG Huafeng. Effects of different full-biodegradable mulching films on greenhouse fresh peanut yield[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(3): 645-651.

Figures/Tables 6

References 11

[1]	周龙, 王芳, 赵伟丽, 等. 作物地膜覆盖栽培研究进展[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2019, 58(S2): 75-81.
[2]	WILCOX C, VAN SEBILLE E, HARDESTY B D. Threat of plastic pollution to seabirds is global, pervasive, and increasing[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015, 112(38): 11899-11904.
[3]	张凯, 郭继民, 王坤, 等. 全生物降解地膜在农业生产中的推广应用前景分析[J]. 中国果菜, 2023, 43(4): 62-66.
[4]	曹晓庆, 李璐, 张锋伟, 等. 五种常见可降解地膜的研究应用现状和展望[J]. 核农学报, 2023, 37(5): 1076-1087.
[5]	沈毓骏, 王铭伦. 花生地膜覆盖栽培助其下针的敷土法[J]. 耕作与栽培, 1984, 4(5): 11.
[6]	应金耀, 周华萍. 萧山区耕地地力评价与管理[M]. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2023: 111-119.
[7]	王玉芝, 许贵民, 王郁兰. 地膜覆盖栽培花生增产效果的研究[J]. 吉林农业大学学报, 1981, 3(2): 27-31.
[8]	白成鑫, 高嘉聪, 曾檬, 等. 3种Maillard反应前体物质对稻草木质素腐解及腐殖质组成的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(6): 39-43.
[9]	苏玲, 姜贵全, 庞久寅, 等. 木质素基聚电解质交联薄膜的透光性和透气性[J]. 功能材料, 2018, 49(6): 6097-6102.
[10]	王娇阳. 改性木质素增强聚乳酸包装膜性能的研究[D]. 天津: 天津科技大学, 2021.
[11]	彭振英, 单雷, 张智猛, 等. 花生株型与高产[J]. 花生学报, 2019, 48(2): 69-72.

编号	颜色	规格/ μm	主要成分	处理简称
1	白色	6	PLA/PBAT	新白6
2	白色	8	PLA/PBAT	新白8
3	白色	10		PLA/PBAT	新白10
4	白色	8	PLA/PBAT	浙白8
5	白色	10	PLA/PBAT	浙白10
6	银黑色	10		PLA/PBAT	浙银10
7	白色	8	PLA/PBAT	昶白8
8	白色	10	PLA/PBAT	昶白10
9	黑色	10		PLA/PBAT	昶黑10
10	裸地	—		PLA/PBAT/木质素	对照

编号	颜色	规格/ μm	主要成分	处理简称
1	白色	6	PLA/PBAT	新白6
2	白色	8	PLA/PBAT	新白8
3	白色	10		PLA/PBAT	新白10
4	白色	8	PLA/PBAT	浙白8
5	白色	10	PLA/PBAT	浙白10
6	银黑色	10		PLA/PBAT	浙银10
7	白色	8	PLA/PBAT	昶白8
8	白色	10	PLA/PBAT	昶白10
9	黑色	10		PLA/PBAT	昶黑10
10	裸地	—		PLA/PBAT/木质素	对照

处理简称	株高/cm	开展度/cm	小区穴数/个	每穴株数/株	分枝数/个
新白6	63.33±4.97 a A	41.67±3.90 a A	72.0±0 ab A	1.8±0.2 a A	12.1±2.5 a A
新白8	69.30±0.14 a A	41.70±5.96 a A	76.3±3.8 ab A	1.9±0.3 a A	13.3±2.5 a A
新白10	64.90±3.92 a A	39.37±6.34 a A	68.0±0 ab A	1.6±0.2 a A	11.6±1.9 a A
浙白8	67.30±0.71 a A	39.67±7.51 a A	72.3±2.5 ab A	1.6±0.2 a A	12.9±2.4 a A
浙白10	68.43±6.75 a A	41.87±6.77 a A	72.0±7.5 ab A	1.9±0.4 a A	13.1±0.2 a A
浙银10	64.57±2.74 a A	40.20±5.30 a A	69.0±7.9 ab A	1.6±0.2 a A	11.7±1.0 a A
昶白8	61.87±6.79 a A	39.20±0.00 a A	67.5±0.7 a A	2.0±0 a A	14.2±0.9 a A
昶白10	63.69±2.31 a A	41.93±1.36 a A	75.5±0.7 ab A	1.7±0.2 a A	11.9±0.9 a A
昶黑10	68.39±6.00 a A	43.88±5.11 a A	77.7±8.0 ab A	1.8±0 a A	12.8±0.3 a A
对照	61.83±4.68 a A	42.40±3.14 a A	79.5±2.1 b A	1.6±0.2 a A	10.7±2.3 a A

处理简称	株高/cm	开展度/cm	小区穴数/个	每穴株数/株	分枝数/个
新白6	63.33±4.97 a A	41.67±3.90 a A	72.0±0 ab A	1.8±0.2 a A	12.1±2.5 a A
新白8	69.30±0.14 a A	41.70±5.96 a A	76.3±3.8 ab A	1.9±0.3 a A	13.3±2.5 a A
新白10	64.90±3.92 a A	39.37±6.34 a A	68.0±0 ab A	1.6±0.2 a A	11.6±1.9 a A
浙白8	67.30±0.71 a A	39.67±7.51 a A	72.3±2.5 ab A	1.6±0.2 a A	12.9±2.4 a A
浙白10	68.43±6.75 a A	41.87±6.77 a A	72.0±7.5 ab A	1.9±0.4 a A	13.1±0.2 a A
浙银10	64.57±2.74 a A	40.20±5.30 a A	69.0±7.9 ab A	1.6±0.2 a A	11.7±1.0 a A
昶白8	61.87±6.79 a A	39.20±0.00 a A	67.5±0.7 a A	2.0±0 a A	14.2±0.9 a A
昶白10	63.69±2.31 a A	41.93±1.36 a A	75.5±0.7 ab A	1.7±0.2 a A	11.9±0.9 a A
昶黑10	68.39±6.00 a A	43.88±5.11 a A	77.7±8.0 ab A	1.8±0 a A	12.8±0.3 a A
对照	61.83±4.68 a A	42.40±3.14 a A	79.5±2.1 b A	1.6±0.2 a A	10.7±2.3 a A

处理简称	单株果数	饱果率/%	双荚率/%	单果荚重/g
新白6	29.0±6.7 bc A	90.59±1.72 b C	76.39±4.39 b AB	2.03±0.15 ab A
新白8	26.3±0.6 abc A	88.39±3.25 b ABC	76.49±0.36 b AB	2.08±0.26 ab A
新白10	21.5±4.5 ab A	82.65±3.36 a AB	72.63±8.82 ab AB	2.39±0.31 ab A
浙白8	24.6±0.6 abc A	90.31±1.64 b C	75.27±6.49 b AB	2.78±0.78 b A
浙白10	24.7±2.5 abc A	87.43±4.27 ab ABC	73.72±2.82 ab AB	2.11±0.28 ab A
浙银10	23.6±5.7 abc A	89.12±0.58 b ABC	80.01±3.15 b B	2.58±0.25 b A
昶白8	30.8±2.8 c A	90.14±1.17 b BC	75.72±4.34 b AB	1.73±0.45 a A
昶白10	20.9±1.0 ab A	85.29±2.70 ab ABC	64.89±3.91 a A	1.75±0.04 a A
昶黑10	25.8±4.2 abc A	82.39±2.58 a A	73.92±3.00 ab AB	2.09±0.06 ab A
对照	18.9±5.1 a A	88.83±1.38 b ABC	74.32±2.93 b AB	2.48±0.29 ab A