Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2024, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (4): 908-912.DOI: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20230594
Previous Articles Next Articles
JI Zhenmeng(
), SHEN Yesong, YIN Min, ZHU Li, LI Yafang, SUN Kouzhong*()
Received:2023-06-28
Online:2024-04-11
Published:2024-04-22
CLC Number:
JI Zhenmeng, SHEN Yesong, YIN Min, ZHU Li, LI Yafang, SUN Kouzhong. Principal component analysis of yield and traits of sweet corn varieties in Yancheng City[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(4): 908-912.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnykx.cn/EN/10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20230594
| 品种 | 倒伏 | 茎腐病 | 大斑病 | 小斑病 | 穗腐病 | 粗缩病 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 病级 | 病株率/% | 病级 | 病株率/% | 病级 | 病株率/% | 病级 | 病株率/% | 病级 | 病株率/% | ||
| 皇金翠7号 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 粤甜43号 | 0 | 1 | 0.8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 亨甜302 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.8 |
| 金冠2054 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 碧莹808 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1.6 |
| 斯达甜240 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 荆恒甜19号 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 亨甜329 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 亨甜99 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 亨白甜328 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 金银131 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 京科甜909 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 粤甜3211 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 中农大甜413 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 品种 | 螟害率/ % | 丝黑穗病 | 瘤黑粉病 | 矮花叶病 | 纹枯病 | ||||||
| 病级 | 病株率/% | 病级 | 病株率/% | 病级 | 病株率/% | 病级 | 病株率/% | ||||
| 皇金翠7号 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 粤甜43号 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 亨甜302 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 金冠2054 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 碧莹808 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 斯达甜240 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 荆恒甜19号 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 亨甜329 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 亨甜99 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 亨白甜328 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 金银131 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 京科甜909 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 粤甜3211 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 中农大甜413 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
Table 1 Resistance of sweet corn
| 品种 | 倒伏 | 茎腐病 | 大斑病 | 小斑病 | 穗腐病 | 粗缩病 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 病级 | 病株率/% | 病级 | 病株率/% | 病级 | 病株率/% | 病级 | 病株率/% | 病级 | 病株率/% | ||
| 皇金翠7号 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 粤甜43号 | 0 | 1 | 0.8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 亨甜302 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.8 |
| 金冠2054 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 碧莹808 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1.6 |
| 斯达甜240 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 荆恒甜19号 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 亨甜329 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 亨甜99 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 亨白甜328 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 金银131 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 京科甜909 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 粤甜3211 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 中农大甜413 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 品种 | 螟害率/ % | 丝黑穗病 | 瘤黑粉病 | 矮花叶病 | 纹枯病 | ||||||
| 病级 | 病株率/% | 病级 | 病株率/% | 病级 | 病株率/% | 病级 | 病株率/% | ||||
| 皇金翠7号 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 粤甜43号 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 亨甜302 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 金冠2054 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 碧莹808 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 斯达甜240 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 荆恒甜19号 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 亨甜329 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 亨甜99 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 亨白甜328 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 金银131 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 京科甜909 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 粤甜3211 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 中农大甜413 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 品种 | 产量/(kg·hm-2) | 比CK/% | 位次 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 皇金翠7号 | 9 562.5 cC | 20.04 | 5 |
| 粤甜43号 | 10 729.2 bB | 28.74 | 3 |
| 亨甜302 | 9 625.0 cC | 20.56 | 4 |
| 金冠2054 | 9 187.5 cdCD | 16.78 | 7 |
| 碧莹808 | 8 125.0 gFG | 5.90 | 13 |
| 斯达甜240 | 9 583.3 cC | 20.22 | 6 |
| 荆恒甜19号 | 8 770.8 defDEF | 12.83 | 10 |
| 亨甜329 | 8 333.3 fgEF | 8.25 | 12 |
| 亨甜99 | 9 187.5 cdCD | 16.78 | 8 |
| 亨白甜328 | 8 958.3 deCDE | 14.65 | 9 |
| 金银131 | 8 604.2 efgDEF | 11.14 | 11 |
| 京科甜909 | 10 854.2 bB | 29.56 | 2 |
| 粤甜3211 | 11 916.7 aA | 35.84 | 1 |
| 中农大甜413 | 7 645.8 hG | 0.00 | 14 |
Table 2 Yield of each variety tested
| 品种 | 产量/(kg·hm-2) | 比CK/% | 位次 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 皇金翠7号 | 9 562.5 cC | 20.04 | 5 |
| 粤甜43号 | 10 729.2 bB | 28.74 | 3 |
| 亨甜302 | 9 625.0 cC | 20.56 | 4 |
| 金冠2054 | 9 187.5 cdCD | 16.78 | 7 |
| 碧莹808 | 8 125.0 gFG | 5.90 | 13 |
| 斯达甜240 | 9 583.3 cC | 20.22 | 6 |
| 荆恒甜19号 | 8 770.8 defDEF | 12.83 | 10 |
| 亨甜329 | 8 333.3 fgEF | 8.25 | 12 |
| 亨甜99 | 9 187.5 cdCD | 16.78 | 8 |
| 亨白甜328 | 8 958.3 deCDE | 14.65 | 9 |
| 金银131 | 8 604.2 efgDEF | 11.14 | 11 |
| 京科甜909 | 10 854.2 bB | 29.56 | 2 |
| 粤甜3211 | 11 916.7 aA | 35.84 | 1 |
| 中农大甜413 | 7 645.8 hG | 0.00 | 14 |
| 指标 | 株高/ cm | 穗位高/ cm | 空秆率/ % | 双穗率/ % | 成株 叶片数 | 行粒数 | 单穗重/ g | 穗行数 | 籽粒深度/ cm | 秃尖长/ cm | 穗长/ cm | 生育期/ d |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 最大值 | 233.60 | 113.00 | 12.10 | 3.25 | 22.20 | 43.00 | 304.36 | 18.80 | 1.18 | 3.72 | 22.06 | 85.00 |
| 最小值 | 173.20 | 50.40 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 17.00 | 32.40 | 186.06 | 13.20 | 0.75 | 0.20 | 16.70 | 76.00 |
| 平均值 | 206.27 | 81.34 | 4.34 | 0.35 | 19.29 | 38.63 | 248.38 | 17.01 | 0.94 | 1.45 | 19.75 | 78.64 |
| 标准差 | 19.12 | 18.79 | 3.72 | 0.88 | 1.70 | 3.11 | 37.14 | 1.59 | 0.15 | 0.95 | 1.79 | 2.92 |
| 变异系数/% | 9.27 | 23.10 | 85.84 | 255.22 | 8.82 | 8.05 | 14.95 | 15.93 | 65.35 | 9.05 | 3.72 | 9.27 |
Table 3 Agronomic traits of each tested variety
| 指标 | 株高/ cm | 穗位高/ cm | 空秆率/ % | 双穗率/ % | 成株 叶片数 | 行粒数 | 单穗重/ g | 穗行数 | 籽粒深度/ cm | 秃尖长/ cm | 穗长/ cm | 生育期/ d |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 最大值 | 233.60 | 113.00 | 12.10 | 3.25 | 22.20 | 43.00 | 304.36 | 18.80 | 1.18 | 3.72 | 22.06 | 85.00 |
| 最小值 | 173.20 | 50.40 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 17.00 | 32.40 | 186.06 | 13.20 | 0.75 | 0.20 | 16.70 | 76.00 |
| 平均值 | 206.27 | 81.34 | 4.34 | 0.35 | 19.29 | 38.63 | 248.38 | 17.01 | 0.94 | 1.45 | 19.75 | 78.64 |
| 标准差 | 19.12 | 18.79 | 3.72 | 0.88 | 1.70 | 3.11 | 37.14 | 1.59 | 0.15 | 0.95 | 1.79 | 2.92 |
| 变异系数/% | 9.27 | 23.10 | 85.84 | 255.22 | 8.82 | 8.05 | 14.95 | 15.93 | 65.35 | 9.05 | 3.72 | 9.27 |
| 主成分 | 初始特征值 | 提取平方和载入 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 合计 | 方差/% | 累积/% | 合计 | 方差/% | 累积/% | |
| 1 | 5.874 | 48.951 | 48.951 | 5.874 | 48.951 | 48.951 |
| 2 | 1.854 | 15.448 | 64.399 | 1.854 | 15.448 | 64.399 |
| 3 | 1.419 | 11.827 | 76.226 | 1.419 | 11.827 | 76.226 |
| 4 | 1.114 | 9.281 | 85.507 | 1.114 | 9.281 | 85.507 |
| 5 | 0.739 | 6.159 | 91.666 | |||
Table 4 Characteristic values and contribution rates of agronomic trait correlation matrix of each variety
| 主成分 | 初始特征值 | 提取平方和载入 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 合计 | 方差/% | 累积/% | 合计 | 方差/% | 累积/% | |
| 1 | 5.874 | 48.951 | 48.951 | 5.874 | 48.951 | 48.951 |
| 2 | 1.854 | 15.448 | 64.399 | 1.854 | 15.448 | 64.399 |
| 3 | 1.419 | 11.827 | 76.226 | 1.419 | 11.827 | 76.226 |
| 4 | 1.114 | 9.281 | 85.507 | 1.114 | 9.281 | 85.507 |
| 5 | 0.739 | 6.159 | 91.666 | |||
| 农艺性状 | 第1主成分 | 第2主成分 | 第3主成分 | 第4主成分 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 株高 | 0.602 | -0.138 | -0.702 | 0.168 |
| 穗位高 | 0.867 | -0.013 | -0.450 | 0.081 |
| 空秆率 | 0.410 | 0.526 | 0.181 | 0.554 |
| 双穗率 | 0.555 | 0.090 | 0.201 | 0.585 |
| 成株叶片数 | 0.899 | -0.101 | -0.267 | -0.179 |
| 行粒数 | 0.472 | -0.712 | 0.408 | 0.193 |
| 单穗重 | 0.885 | -0.155 | 0.193 | -0.216 |
| 穗行数 | 0.724 | 0.314 | 0.100 | 0.172 |
| 籽粒深度 | 0.749 | -0.437 | 0.289 | -0.232 |
| 秃尖长 | 0.324 | 0.812 | 0.087 | -0.410 |
| 穗长 | 0.767 | 0.239 | 0.478 | -0.200 |
| 生育期 | 0.832 | 0.057 | -0.217 | -0.152 |
| 特征值 | 5.874 | 1.854 | 1.419 | 1.114 |
| 贡献率/% | 48.951 | 15.448 | 11.827 | 9.281 |
Table 5 Principal component analysis of each trait of tested sweet corn varieties
| 农艺性状 | 第1主成分 | 第2主成分 | 第3主成分 | 第4主成分 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 株高 | 0.602 | -0.138 | -0.702 | 0.168 |
| 穗位高 | 0.867 | -0.013 | -0.450 | 0.081 |
| 空秆率 | 0.410 | 0.526 | 0.181 | 0.554 |
| 双穗率 | 0.555 | 0.090 | 0.201 | 0.585 |
| 成株叶片数 | 0.899 | -0.101 | -0.267 | -0.179 |
| 行粒数 | 0.472 | -0.712 | 0.408 | 0.193 |
| 单穗重 | 0.885 | -0.155 | 0.193 | -0.216 |
| 穗行数 | 0.724 | 0.314 | 0.100 | 0.172 |
| 籽粒深度 | 0.749 | -0.437 | 0.289 | -0.232 |
| 秃尖长 | 0.324 | 0.812 | 0.087 | -0.410 |
| 穗长 | 0.767 | 0.239 | 0.478 | -0.200 |
| 生育期 | 0.832 | 0.057 | -0.217 | -0.152 |
| 特征值 | 5.874 | 1.854 | 1.419 | 1.114 |
| 贡献率/% | 48.951 | 15.448 | 11.827 | 9.281 |
| 参试品种 | 综合 主成分得分 | 排序 | 参试品种 | 综合 主成分得分 | 排序 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 皇金翠7号 | 1.09 | 3 | 亨甜329 | -1.84 | 14 |
| 粤甜43号 | 0.22 | 5 | 亨甜99 | -0.91 | 12 |
| 亨甜302 | 1.07 | 4 | 亨白甜328 | 2.31 | 1 |
| 金冠2054 | 1.83 | 2 | 金银131 | 0.14 | 6 |
| 碧莹808 | -0.20 | 7 | 京科甜909 | -0.59 | 9 |
| 斯达甜240 | -0.68 | 10 | 粤甜3211 | -1.35 | 13 |
| 荆恒甜19号 | -0.27 | 8 | 中农大甜413 | -0.80 | 11 |
Table 6 Comprehensive scores of the test materials
| 参试品种 | 综合 主成分得分 | 排序 | 参试品种 | 综合 主成分得分 | 排序 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 皇金翠7号 | 1.09 | 3 | 亨甜329 | -1.84 | 14 |
| 粤甜43号 | 0.22 | 5 | 亨甜99 | -0.91 | 12 |
| 亨甜302 | 1.07 | 4 | 亨白甜328 | 2.31 | 1 |
| 金冠2054 | 1.83 | 2 | 金银131 | 0.14 | 6 |
| 碧莹808 | -0.20 | 7 | 京科甜909 | -0.59 | 9 |
| 斯达甜240 | -0.68 | 10 | 粤甜3211 | -1.35 | 13 |
| 荆恒甜19号 | -0.27 | 8 | 中农大甜413 | -0.80 | 11 |
| [1] | 胡俏强, 吉善良, 陈舜权, 等. 超甜玉米新品种晶甜9号的选育[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2016, 44(36): 81-83. |
| [2] | 严雨洁, 盛力立, 倪江, 等. 鲜食甜玉米品种比较与筛选试验[J]. 上海蔬菜, 2023(1): 1-4. |
| [3] | 江均平, 孙艳丽, 裴志超, 等. 北京鲜食甜玉米营养成分分析与评价[J]. 中国食物与营养, 2020, 26(8): 55-59. |
| [4] | 李昂, 刘瑞涵, 王俊英. 中国甜玉米贸易结构分析[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2020(11): 17-22. |
| [5] | 纪从亮. 江苏鲜食玉米产业化开发的实践与启示[J]. 江苏农村经济, 2015(8): 26-28. |
| [6] | 陈舜权, 胡俏强, 潘玖琴, 等. 江苏省鲜食玉米产业现状及发展对策[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2015, 43(32): 320-321, 331. |
| [7] | 李坤, 黄长玲. 我国甜玉米产业发展现状、问题与对策[J]. 中国糖料, 2021, 43(1): 67-71. |
| [8] | 唐丽敏, 钱双宏, 李正润, 等. 玉米品种区域试验产量及性状主成分分析[J]. 云南农业, 2022(12): 60-65. |
| [9] | 王俊花, 闫建宾, 王瑞钢. 基于主成分、聚类和灰色关联度分析的超甜玉米杂交组合综合评价[J]. 南方农业学报, 2020, 51(5): 1108-1114. |
| [10] | 曹翔翔. 玉米大、小斑病发生流行原因及防治对策[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2011, 31(7): 28-29. |
| [11] | 陈方. 秋玉米纹枯病的发生与防治[J]. 植物保护, 1986, 12(5): 27-28. |
| [12] | 赵丽琨. 玉米茎腐病的发生原因与防治对策[J]. 种子科技, 2020, 38(1): 103-104. |
| [13] | 马苍江, 张正. 山西省不同地区玉米病害发生情况及原因分析[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2010, 30(2): 17-19. |
| [14] | 刘萍. 中国鲜食甜、糯玉米品种试验产量与品质评价体系的建设[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2007. |
| [1] | HUANG Yechang, ZENG Wei, DENG Lizhang, KANG Yuliu, PAN Binrong. Experimental study on field fertilizer efficiency of fresh corn soil testing and formula fertilization in Wenzhou [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(3): 536-540. |
| [2] | XIE Xiaocong, ZHENG Xiaokang, XU Xinxin, LI Xiaoli, SHI Liyun, BAO Rizai. Effect of partial substitution of chemical fertilizer with organic fertilizer on yield and nitrogen use efficiency of maize [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(3): 541-544. |
| [3] | Zhonglin NIU, Xiaochun JIN, Lili WU, Rulai LI, Baifu JIANG, Qingsheng WANG, Nannan WANG. Field control efficacy of different herbicide dosages and their effects on maize safety [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(2): 382-384. |
| [4] | HU Ji, ZHENG Huazhang, YANG Yangyang. Screening and selection trial for fresh maize variety introduction in Yuyao City [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(1): 52-55. |
| [5] | . [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 64(12): 2850-2852. |
| [6] | . [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 64(8): 1849-1853. |
| [7] | . [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 64(6): 1429-1437. |
| [8] | . [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 64(4): 931-934. |
| [9] | . [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 64(3): 567-569. |
| [10] | . [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 64(3): 578-581. |
| [11] | . [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 64(3): 582-587. |
| [12] | . [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 64(1): 199-203. |
| [13] | . [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 63(12): 2785-2790. |
| [14] | . [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 63(12): 2791-2794. |
| [15] | . [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 63(12): 2802-2804. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
