
Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2026, Vol. 67 ›› Issue (8): 1848-1854.DOI: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20250761
Previous Articles Next Articles
CHEN Jinfei(
), LI Pengquan, LIU Weicheng(
), DING Wenyong, JI Dewei, CHEN Chen
Received:2025-10-14
Online:2026-08-11
Published:2026-08-20
Contact:
LIU Weicheng
CLC Number:
CHEN Jinfei, LI Pengquan, LIU Weicheng, DING Wenyong, JI Dewei, CHEN Chen. Effects of fermented feed as a replacement for trash fish on growth performance,digestive enzyme activity,and flesh quality of Bostrychus sinensis[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(8): 1848-1854.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnykx.cn/EN/10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20250761
| 饲料种类 | 粗蛋白含量 | 水分含量 | 灰分含量 | 粗脂肪含量 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 白鲢鱼肉 | 188±5 | 765±2 | 12±1 | 18±3 |
| 冰鲜梅鱼(小杂鱼) | 167±14 | 670±1 | 17±1 | 134±8 |
| 发酵饲料 | 290±1 | 411±2 | 94±1 | 55±1 |
Table 1 Nutrient composition of the experimental feed
| 饲料种类 | 粗蛋白含量 | 水分含量 | 灰分含量 | 粗脂肪含量 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 白鲢鱼肉 | 188±5 | 765±2 | 12±1 | 18±3 |
| 冰鲜梅鱼(小杂鱼) | 167±14 | 670±1 | 17±1 | 134±8 |
| 发酵饲料 | 290±1 | 411±2 | 94±1 | 55±1 |
| 饲料种类 | C14:0含量 | C15:0含量 | C16:0含量 | C17:0含量 | C18:0含量 | C20:0含量 | C22:0含量 | SFA含量 | C14:1含量 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 白鲢鱼肉 | 4.66 | 1.33 | 20.6 | 1.25 | 5.38 | 0.49 | 0.24 | 33.95 | 0.12 | |||||
| 冰鲜梅鱼(小杂鱼) | 3.76 | 0.67 | 28.2 | 0.56 | 4.60 | 0.34 | 0.16 | 38.29 | 0.06 | |||||
| 发酵饲料 | 4.95 | 0.43 | 17.5 | 0.36 | 4.45 | 0.29 | 0.16 | 28.14 | 0.04 | |||||
| 饲料种类 | C16:1含量 | C18:1含量 | C18:1 t含量 | C20:1含量 | C24:1含量 | C22:1含量 | MUFA含量 | C18:2含量 | C18:3 ALA含量 | |||||
| 白鲢鱼肉 | 10.40 | 20.3 | 0.62 | 1.70 | 0.07 | 0.25 | 33.46 | 6.99 | 8.81 | |||||
| 冰鲜梅鱼(小杂鱼) | 10.60 | 21.4 | 0.12 | 2.19 | 0.52 | 0.16 | 35.05 | 4.96 | 1.25 | |||||
| 发酵饲料 | 6.08 | 27.5 | 0.09 | 3.37 | 0.66 | 0.40 | 38.14 | 9.88 | 2.83 | |||||
| 饲料种类 | C18:3GLA含量 | C20:3含量 | C22:2含量 | C20:4含量 | C20:5含量 | C22:6含量 | PUFA含量 | |||||||
| 白鲢鱼肉 | 0.86 | 1.37 | 0.59 | 3.05 | 6.28 | 4.53 | 32.48 | |||||||
| 冰鲜梅鱼(小杂鱼) | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.30 | 1.15 | 5.56 | 13.3 | 26.72 | |||||||
| 发酵饲料 | 0.15 | 0.24 | 0.81 | 0.78 | 9.47 | 9.56 | 33.72 | |||||||
Table 2 Fatty acid composition of experimental feed(total fatty acid)
| 饲料种类 | C14:0含量 | C15:0含量 | C16:0含量 | C17:0含量 | C18:0含量 | C20:0含量 | C22:0含量 | SFA含量 | C14:1含量 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 白鲢鱼肉 | 4.66 | 1.33 | 20.6 | 1.25 | 5.38 | 0.49 | 0.24 | 33.95 | 0.12 | |||||
| 冰鲜梅鱼(小杂鱼) | 3.76 | 0.67 | 28.2 | 0.56 | 4.60 | 0.34 | 0.16 | 38.29 | 0.06 | |||||
| 发酵饲料 | 4.95 | 0.43 | 17.5 | 0.36 | 4.45 | 0.29 | 0.16 | 28.14 | 0.04 | |||||
| 饲料种类 | C16:1含量 | C18:1含量 | C18:1 t含量 | C20:1含量 | C24:1含量 | C22:1含量 | MUFA含量 | C18:2含量 | C18:3 ALA含量 | |||||
| 白鲢鱼肉 | 10.40 | 20.3 | 0.62 | 1.70 | 0.07 | 0.25 | 33.46 | 6.99 | 8.81 | |||||
| 冰鲜梅鱼(小杂鱼) | 10.60 | 21.4 | 0.12 | 2.19 | 0.52 | 0.16 | 35.05 | 4.96 | 1.25 | |||||
| 发酵饲料 | 6.08 | 27.5 | 0.09 | 3.37 | 0.66 | 0.40 | 38.14 | 9.88 | 2.83 | |||||
| 饲料种类 | C18:3GLA含量 | C20:3含量 | C22:2含量 | C20:4含量 | C20:5含量 | C22:6含量 | PUFA含量 | |||||||
| 白鲢鱼肉 | 0.86 | 1.37 | 0.59 | 3.05 | 6.28 | 4.53 | 32.48 | |||||||
| 冰鲜梅鱼(小杂鱼) | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.30 | 1.15 | 5.56 | 13.3 | 26.72 | |||||||
| 发酵饲料 | 0.15 | 0.24 | 0.81 | 0.78 | 9.47 | 9.56 | 33.72 | |||||||
| 处理 | 初始体重/g | 终末体重/g | 终末体长/cm | 存活率/% | 增重率/% | 特定生长率/% | 肥满度/ (g·cm-3) | 脏体比/% | 肝体比/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HM | 21.35±1.23 a | 72.06±16.91 a | 14.83±1.13 a | 84.06±10.94 a | 238.22±79.74 a | 1.32±0.27 a | 2.17±0.18 a | 13.72±4.68 ab | 5.88±0.90 a |
| FD | 20.77±0.49 a | 66.88±15.14 a | 14.60±1.11 a | 86.47±8.74 a | 221.94±72.94 a | 1.27±0.27 a | 2.11±0.16 a | 11.89±4.38 b | 3.87±1.28 b |
| CTF | 21.28±0.34 a | 71.08±21.05 a | 14.91±1.41 a | 64.55±3.17 b | 234.67±99.49 a | 1.30±0.33 a | 2.09±0.17 a | 15.06±4.66 a | 6.28±0.89 a |
Table 3 Growth performance and body profile indices of Bostrychus sinensis under different treatments
| 处理 | 初始体重/g | 终末体重/g | 终末体长/cm | 存活率/% | 增重率/% | 特定生长率/% | 肥满度/ (g·cm-3) | 脏体比/% | 肝体比/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HM | 21.35±1.23 a | 72.06±16.91 a | 14.83±1.13 a | 84.06±10.94 a | 238.22±79.74 a | 1.32±0.27 a | 2.17±0.18 a | 13.72±4.68 ab | 5.88±0.90 a |
| FD | 20.77±0.49 a | 66.88±15.14 a | 14.60±1.11 a | 86.47±8.74 a | 221.94±72.94 a | 1.27±0.27 a | 2.11±0.16 a | 11.89±4.38 b | 3.87±1.28 b |
| CTF | 21.28±0.34 a | 71.08±21.05 a | 14.91±1.41 a | 64.55±3.17 b | 234.67±99.49 a | 1.30±0.33 a | 2.09±0.17 a | 15.06±4.66 a | 6.28±0.89 a |
| 处理 | 胃蛋白酶活性/ (U·mg-1) | 脂肪酶活性/(U·g-1) | 淀粉酶活性/(U·mg-1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| HM | 19.62±6.64 b | 16.17±1.65 b | 0.59±0.04 a |
| FD | 46.05±4.47 a | 29.78±1.18 a | 0.46±0.07 b |
| CTF | 7.69±1.03 c | 32.23±2.49 a | 0.32±0.02 c |
Table 4 Digestive enzyme activity of Bostrychus sinensis under different treatments
| 处理 | 胃蛋白酶活性/ (U·mg-1) | 脂肪酶活性/(U·g-1) | 淀粉酶活性/(U·mg-1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| HM | 19.62±6.64 b | 16.17±1.65 b | 0.59±0.04 a |
| FD | 46.05±4.47 a | 29.78±1.18 a | 0.46±0.07 b |
| CTF | 7.69±1.03 c | 32.23±2.49 a | 0.32±0.02 c |
| 处理 | 粗蛋白含量 | 水分含量 | 灰分含量 | 粗脂肪含量 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HM | 177.7±5.9 a | 767.3±5.1 a | 22.7±6.4 a | 14.7±2.5 a |
| FD | 191.3±10.0 a | 759.7±10.0 a | 25.0±8.0 a | 14.3±0.6 a |
| CTF | 175.3±16.1 a | 768.0±11.8 a | 18.3±2.5 a | 16.7±3.8 a |
Table 5 Nutrient composition of Bostrychus sinensis under different treatments
| 处理 | 粗蛋白含量 | 水分含量 | 灰分含量 | 粗脂肪含量 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HM | 177.7±5.9 a | 767.3±5.1 a | 22.7±6.4 a | 14.7±2.5 a |
| FD | 191.3±10.0 a | 759.7±10.0 a | 25.0±8.0 a | 14.3±0.6 a |
| CTF | 175.3±16.1 a | 768.0±11.8 a | 18.3±2.5 a | 16.7±3.8 a |
| 处理 | C14:0含量 | C15:0含量 | C16:0含量 | C17:0含量 | C18:0含量 | C20:0含量 | C22:0含量 | SFA含量 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HM | 3.65±0.10 a | 0.68±0.10 a | 23.40±0.26 a | 0.46±0.07 a | 5.85±0.08 a | 0.31±0.01 a | 0.11±0.01 a | 34.46±0.31 a | |||||
| FD | 3.70±0.08 a | 0.69±0.17 a | 22.50±1.15 a | 0.48±0.12 a | 5.88±0.14 a | 0.32±0.02 a | 0.14±0.04 a | 33.71±1.34 a | |||||
| CTF | 3.65±0.12 a | 0.64±0.03 a | 23.10±0.10 a | 0.45±0.02 a | 5.79±0.02 a | 0.32±0.01 a | 0.14±0.01 a | 34.09±0.11 a | |||||
| 处理 | C14:1含量 | C16:1含量 | C18:1含量 | C18:1 t含量 | C20:1含量 | C22:1含量 | C24:1含量 | MUFA含量 | |||||
| HM | 0.07±0.01 a | 10.73±0.42 a | 25.07±0.15 a | 0.22±0.07 a | 1.79±0.06 a | 0.17±0.02 a | 0.31±0.07 a | 38.36±0.59 a | |||||
| FD | 0.53±0.41 a | 9.95±1.50 a | 25.03±0.31 a | 0.24±0.10 a | 1.92±0.36 a | 0.19±0.06 a | 0.34±0.13 a | 38.20±0.77 a | |||||
| CTF | 0.08±0.01 a | 11.10±0.30 a | 24.87±0.42 a | 0.21±0.03 a | 1.89±0.06 a | 0.20±0.01 a | 0.40±0.03 a | 38.75±0.58 a | |||||
| 处理 | C18:2含量 | C18:3 ALA含量 | C18:3 GLA含量 | C20:3含量 | C20:4含量 | C20:5含量 | C22:2含量 | C22:6含量 | PUFA含量 | ||||
| HM | 5.21±0.33 a | 3.55±1.34 a | 0.19±0.04 a | 0.27±0.09 a | 1.50±0.20 a | 5.26±0.12 a | 0.51±0.05 a | 10.72±1.56 a | 27.21±0.63 a | ||||
| FD | 6.31±1.94 a | 3.65±1.82 a | 0.20±0.05 a | 0.29±0.12 a | 1.50±0.42 a | 5.60±0.58 a | 0.59±0.09 a | 10.41±1.82 a | 28.55±2.04 a | ||||
| CTF | 5.21±0.11 a | 2.72±0.42 a | 0.18±0.02 a | 0.22±0.03 a | 1.38±0.08 a | 5.35±0.30 a | 0.50±0.03 a | 11.60±0.46 a | 27.16±0.45 a | ||||
Table 6 Fatty acid composition of Bostrychus sinensis under different treatments
| 处理 | C14:0含量 | C15:0含量 | C16:0含量 | C17:0含量 | C18:0含量 | C20:0含量 | C22:0含量 | SFA含量 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HM | 3.65±0.10 a | 0.68±0.10 a | 23.40±0.26 a | 0.46±0.07 a | 5.85±0.08 a | 0.31±0.01 a | 0.11±0.01 a | 34.46±0.31 a | |||||
| FD | 3.70±0.08 a | 0.69±0.17 a | 22.50±1.15 a | 0.48±0.12 a | 5.88±0.14 a | 0.32±0.02 a | 0.14±0.04 a | 33.71±1.34 a | |||||
| CTF | 3.65±0.12 a | 0.64±0.03 a | 23.10±0.10 a | 0.45±0.02 a | 5.79±0.02 a | 0.32±0.01 a | 0.14±0.01 a | 34.09±0.11 a | |||||
| 处理 | C14:1含量 | C16:1含量 | C18:1含量 | C18:1 t含量 | C20:1含量 | C22:1含量 | C24:1含量 | MUFA含量 | |||||
| HM | 0.07±0.01 a | 10.73±0.42 a | 25.07±0.15 a | 0.22±0.07 a | 1.79±0.06 a | 0.17±0.02 a | 0.31±0.07 a | 38.36±0.59 a | |||||
| FD | 0.53±0.41 a | 9.95±1.50 a | 25.03±0.31 a | 0.24±0.10 a | 1.92±0.36 a | 0.19±0.06 a | 0.34±0.13 a | 38.20±0.77 a | |||||
| CTF | 0.08±0.01 a | 11.10±0.30 a | 24.87±0.42 a | 0.21±0.03 a | 1.89±0.06 a | 0.20±0.01 a | 0.40±0.03 a | 38.75±0.58 a | |||||
| 处理 | C18:2含量 | C18:3 ALA含量 | C18:3 GLA含量 | C20:3含量 | C20:4含量 | C20:5含量 | C22:2含量 | C22:6含量 | PUFA含量 | ||||
| HM | 5.21±0.33 a | 3.55±1.34 a | 0.19±0.04 a | 0.27±0.09 a | 1.50±0.20 a | 5.26±0.12 a | 0.51±0.05 a | 10.72±1.56 a | 27.21±0.63 a | ||||
| FD | 6.31±1.94 a | 3.65±1.82 a | 0.20±0.05 a | 0.29±0.12 a | 1.50±0.42 a | 5.60±0.58 a | 0.59±0.09 a | 10.41±1.82 a | 28.55±2.04 a | ||||
| CTF | 5.21±0.11 a | 2.72±0.42 a | 0.18±0.02 a | 0.22±0.03 a | 1.38±0.08 a | 5.35±0.30 a | 0.50±0.03 a | 11.60±0.46 a | 27.16±0.45 a | ||||
| 处理 | 血清溶菌酶活性/(μg·mL-1) | 肝脏溶菌酶活性/(μg·mg-1) | 肝脏总抗氧化能力/(U·mg-1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| HM | 119.84±8.84 a | 37.58±2.28 a | 3.42±0.89 a |
| FD | 33.33±2.10 c | 9.10±3.57 c | 2.37±0.68 b |
| CTF | 44.97±9.03 b | 28.28±4.20 b | 1.07±0.66 c |
Table 7 Serum,liver lysozyme activity and liver total antioxidant capacity of Bostrychus sinensis under different treatments
| 处理 | 血清溶菌酶活性/(μg·mL-1) | 肝脏溶菌酶活性/(μg·mg-1) | 肝脏总抗氧化能力/(U·mg-1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| HM | 119.84±8.84 a | 37.58±2.28 a | 3.42±0.89 a |
| FD | 33.33±2.10 c | 9.10±3.57 c | 2.37±0.68 b |
| CTF | 44.97±9.03 b | 28.28±4.20 b | 1.07±0.66 c |
| [1] | 陆宇哲,潘红平,王帅,等. 3种不同来源中华乌塘鳢成鱼肉质比较分析[J]. 南方农业学报,2018,49(10):2047-2054. |
| [2] | Zhang Y T, Hong W S, Qiu H T,et al. Androgen induces olfactory expression of prostaglandin E2 receptor Ep1 in the burrow-living fish Bostrychus sinensis [J]. The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology,2019,188:156-165. |
| [3] | Zhang Y T, Huang S, Qiu H T,et al. Optimal salinity for rearing Chinese black sleeper(Bostrychus sinensis)fry[J]. Aquaculture,2017,476:37-43. |
| [4] | Peh W Y X, Chew S F, Ching B Y,et al. Roles of intestinal glutamate dehydrogenase and glutamine synthetase in environmental ammonia detoxification in the euryhaline four-eyed sleeper,Bostrychus sinensis [J]. Aquatic Toxicology,2010,98(1):91-98. |
| [5] | 粟文,韩维栋,谢恩义,等. 湛江红树林区地埋管网系统中华乌塘鳢保育研究[J]. 南方水产科学,2018,14(4):66-71. |
| [6] | Zhang Y T, Li Z, Chen S X,et al. Optimization of the culture methods for nursing Chinese black sleeper(Bostrychus sinensis Lacépède,1801)fry using an orthogonal array design[J]. Journal of Applied Ichthyology,2015,31(6):1096-1101. |
| [7] | 沈斌,魏可,殷小龙,等. 养殖中华乌塘鳢致病性弧菌的分离鉴定[J]. 浙江海洋大学学报(自然科学版),2019(5):387-394. |
| [8] | 周真真. 中华乌塘鳢LGP2、MDA5和MAVS基因分子克隆及免疫应答分析[D]. 舟山:浙江海洋大学,2019. |
| [9] | Wei K, Ding Y H, Yin X L,et al. Molecular cloning,expression analyses and functional characterization of a goose-type lysozyme gene from Bostrychus sinensis(Family:Eleotridae)[J]. Fish & Shellfish Immunology,2020,96:41-52. |
| [10] | Ye G L, Dong X H, Yang Q H,et al. A formulated diet improved digestive capacity,immune function and intestinal microbiota structure of juvenile hybrid grouper(Epinephelus fuscoguttatus ♀ × Epinephelus lanceolatus ♂)when compared with chilled trash fish[J]. Aquaculture,2020,523:735230. |
| [11] | Shapawi R, Mustafa S, Ng W K. A comparison of the growth performance and body composition of the humpback grouper,Cromileptes altivelis fed on farm-made feeds,commercial feeds or trash fish[J]. Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science,2011,6(5):523-534. |
| [12] | Kim J H, Gomez D K, Choresca C H,et al. Detection of major bacterial and viral pathogens in trash fish used to feed cultured flounder in Korea[J]. Aquaculture,2007,272:105-110. |
| [13] | Gomez D K, Mori K I, Okinaka Y,et al. Trash fish can be a source of betanodaviruses for cultured marine fish[J]. Aquaculture,2010,302(3/4):158-163. |
| [14] | 黄昇. 酸化海水引起中华乌塘鳢皮肤溃烂病的研究[D]. 厦门:厦门大学,2018. |
| [15] | Mohamad N, Amal M N A, Yasin I S M,et al. Vibriosis in cultured marine fishes:a review[J]. Aquaculture,2019,512:734289. |
| [16] | Xu J H, Qin J, Yan B L,et al. Effects of dietary lipid levels on growth performance,feed utilization and fatty acid composition of juvenile Japanese seabass(Lateolabrax japonicus)reared in seawater[J]. Aquaculture International,2011,19(1):79-89. |
| [17] | 周兴,牛化欣. 颗粒饲料和杂鱼对半滑舌鳎生长和饲料利用率的影响[J]. 饲料工业,2020,41(8):48-52. |
| [18] | 吴仁协,洪万树,张其永,等. 中华乌塘鳢成鱼消化酶活性的研究[J]. 厦门大学学报(自然科学版),2007,46(1):118-122. |
| [19] | 桑永明. 方正银鲫幼鱼对饲料蛋白质和脂肪需求量的研究[D]. 哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2018. |
| [20] | 高擘为,杨航,何明,等. 亚东鲑幼鱼饲料蛋白和脂肪适宜水平的研究[J]. 水生生物学报,2020(3):470-478. |
| [21] | 郭鑫伟,谭北平,迟淑艳,等. 摄食不同蛋白质水平饲料的珍珠龙胆石斑鱼幼鱼生长与血清激素和消化酶活性的相关性分析[J]. 水产学报,2019,43(8):1808-1820. |
| [22] | 周华. 饲料碳水化合物水平对鳡幼鱼生长、体成分及糖代谢酶活性的影响[D]. 武汉:华中农业大学,2011. |
| [23] | Hidalgo M C, Urea E, Sanz A. Comparative study of digestive enzymes in fish with different nutritional habits. Proteolytic and amylase activities[J]. Aquaculture,1999,170(3/4):267-283. |
| [24] | 颉江,李飞扬,刘晓玲,等. 饲料脂肪水平对宽体沙鳅幼鱼生长和肌肉脂肪酸组成及脂肪酶的影响[J]. 西南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2013,38(11):76-83. |
| [25] | 桑永明,杨瑶,尹航,等. 饲料蛋白水平对方正银鲫幼鱼生长、体成分、肝脏生化指标和肠道消化酶活性的影响[J]. 水生生物学报,2018,42(4):736-743. |
| [26] | 丁立云,张利民,王际英,等. 饲料蛋白水平对星斑川鲽幼鱼生长、体组成及血浆生化指标的影响[J]. 中国水产科学,2010,17(6):1285-1292. |
| [27] | 向枭,周兴华,陈建,等. 饲料蛋白水平及鱼粉蛋白含量对齐口裂腹鱼生长、体组成及消化酶活性的影响[J]. 中国粮油学报,2012,27(5):74-80,106. |
| [28] | 叶文娟,韩冬,朱晓鸣,等. 饲料蛋白水平对泥鳅幼鱼生长和饲料利用的影响[J]. 水生生物学报,2014,38(3):571-575. |
| [29] | 彭墨. 饲料脂肪水平和脂肪酸组成对大菱鲆幼鱼脂沉积的影响[D]. 青岛:中国海洋大学,2014. |
| [30] | 许友卿,韩进华,陈亨德,等. 高度不饱和脂肪酸对水生动物生长、发育和繁殖的影响与机理[J]. 水产科学,2018,37(2):271-277. |
| [31] | 王煜恒,刘文斌,王会聪,等. 饲料中亚油酸和亚麻酸含量对团头鲂幼鱼生长、体成分和消化酶活性的影响[J]. 大连海洋大学学报,2014,29(4):373-380. |
| [32] | 戚常乐,林黑着,黄忠,等. 亚麻酸对卵形鲳鲹幼鱼生长性能、消化酶活性及抗氧化能力的影响[J]. 南方水产科学,2016,12(6):59-67. |
| [33] | 徐后国. 饲料脂肪酸对鲈鱼幼鱼生长、健康及脂肪和脂肪酸累积的影响[D]. 青岛:中国海洋大学,2013. |
| [34] | 谢帝芝,王树启,游翠红,等. 鱼类高度不饱和脂肪酸合成的影响因素及其机理[J]. 中国水产科学,2013(2):456-466. |
| [35] | Zhang S H, Xu Q Q, Boscari E,et al. Characterization and expression analysis of g- and c-type lysozymes in Dabry's sturgeon(Acipenser dabryanus)[J]. Fish & Shellfish Immunology,2018,76:260-265. |
| [36] | Liu Q N, Xin Z Z, Zhang D Z,et al. Molecular identification and expression analysis of a goose-type lysozyme(LysG)gene in yellow catfish Pelteobagrus fulvidraco [J]. Fish & Shellfish Immunology,2016,58:423-428. |
| [37] | Gao C B, Fu Q, Zhou S,et al. The mucosal expression signatures of g-type lysozyme in turbot(Scophthalmus maximus)following bacterial challenge[J]. Fish & Shellfish Immunology,2016,54:612-619. |
| [38] | 孙金辉,范泽,张美静,等. 饲料蛋白水平对鲤幼鱼肝功能和抗氧化能力的影响[J]. 南方水产科学,2017,13(3):113-119. |
| [39] | 高婷婷,李勇,张家国,等. 蛋白质营养对工业化养殖大菱鲆生长、消化和免疫的效应[J]. 海洋科学,2012,36(10):73-80. |
| [1] | WANG Li, SONG Lingen, CHEN Zhe, JIANG Luxin, SHI Like, YE Jian, FAN Peng, LI Tingyi, TANG Jinyu. Comparison of growth performance and muscle nutritional components between Taihu No. 3 and native stock of Macrobrachium nipponense under rice-prawn rotation system [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(8): 1882-1887. |
| [2] | ZHANG Kun, YUAN Lu, ZHENG Fangyu, LI Jiayu, LIU Lu, GAN Lingfeng, SHAO Tingting, DING Linling, CHEN Yunlei, ZHONG Qunbin, ZHANG Lei. Effects of feeding with Pomacea canaliculata on growth performance and carcass quality of Shaoxing ducks [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(6): 1551-1555. |
| [3] | BAO Junjie, SUN Yan, XU Bingji, QIN Shidi, YAN Feifei, ZHAO Ayong, WANG Baiqing, XU Jian. Effects of lysozyme on production performance,viscus weight,serum biochemical indicators and lipid metabolism of laying hens [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(2): 477-480. |
| [4] | YAO Xiaohong, SUN Hong, ZHAO Zhiwei, WU Yifei, ZHOU Hanghai, SHEN Qi, WANG Xin, FU Yuan, TANG Jiangwu. Effect of Chlorella vulgaris feed prepared from kitchen waste phase change liquid on the growth performance and nutrient composition of Macrobrachium rosenbergii [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(6): 1257-1262. |
| [5] | HE Linqiang, JIN Jing, YUAN Fan, LI Heng, CHEN Xiaoming, DING Xueyan, ZHOU Fan, BEI Yijiang. Effects of small-scale cage aquaculture on Opsariichthys bidens Gunther based on pond [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(6): 1277-1281. |
| [6] | XU Xiaomei, LI Guiping, YANG Su, CAO Yongqing, LIN Yumei, YU Bo, LI Guoqin, ZENG Tao, TIAN Yong, TAO Zhengrong, SHEN Junda, WANG Donglei, SUN Meihao, LU Lizhi. Studies on growth performance, slaughter performance and muscle quality of Shaoxing ducks under grassland-pond conditions [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(4): 967-970. |
| [7] | Ying GE, Jinghui FAN, Qinghai LI, Hang LIU, Huanhuan WANG, Yinghui WEI, Lei ZHANG. Effects of low protein diets on growth performance and carcass quality of yellow feather broilers [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(2): 454-458. |
| [8] | MA Guangying, YAO Xingda, ZUO Ziwei, ZHAN Shuxia, ZHOU Yuan, XIE Lupeng. Analysis of introduction performance and application potential of edible Hemerocallis varieties in Hangzhou [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(12): 2893-2898. |
| [9] | SU Siyuan, ZHANG Zhiyong, HU Chunmei, LIU Binbin, LIU Junfeng, WANG Honglin, KOU Jing, WU Jianmei. Effects of disease and insect pests on nutrient composition of mulberry leaves and economic characters of silkworm [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(11): 2733-2737. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||