Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2025, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (5): 1126-1132.DOI: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20240076
Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Zhiwei1a,2(), QIN Yaoguo1b, YONG Qinqin1a, LIU Baiqing1a, LIU Jinxiong1a, DUAN Fang1a, LI Yilin1a, YANG Cuiqi1a1a,*(
)
Received:
2024-01-25
Online:
2025-05-11
Published:
2025-05-20
CLC Number:
ZHANG Zhiwei, QIN Yaoguo, YONG Qinqin, LIU Baiqing, LIU Jinxiong, DUAN Fang, LI Yilin, YANG Cuiqia. Effects of biodegradable mulch film coverage on soil temperature, moisture, and yield of summer-sown sweet potato[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(5): 1126-1132.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnykx.cn/EN/10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20240076
移栽后天数/ d | 土壤深度/ cm | 土壤温度/℃ | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | ||
40 | 0 | 26.28 c | 26.41 c | 26.67 c | 28.46 a | 27.58 b | 28.62 a |
5 | 25.76 c | 26.13 c | 26.22 c | 28.13 ab | 27.56 b | 28.42 a | |
15 | 24.37 d | 24.97 c | 24.88 cd | 26.17 b | 26.42 ab | 26.92 a | |
25 | 23.61 b | 24.14 b | 24.13 b | 24.83 a | 25.26 a | 25.18 a | |
70 | 0 | 31.85 a | 30.29 b | 30.13 b | 30.40 b | 30.04 b | 30.35 b |
5 | 31.79 a | 29.42 bc | 29.53 bc | 28.94 c | 29.42 ab | 29.74 b | |
15 | 30.21 a | 28.14 bc | 28.35 bc | 28.00 c | 28.28 bc | 28.66 b | |
25 | 28.56 a | 27.28 b | 27.51 b | 27.19 b | 27.45 b | 27.64 b | |
100 | 0 | 31.63 a | 30.59 bc | 30.57 bc | 31.29 ab | 30.48 bc | 30.14 c |
5 | 30.97 a | 29.42 b | 29.59 b | 30.12 ab | 29.64 b | 29.34 b | |
15 | 29.79 a | 28.33 b | 28.52 b | 28.94 ab | 28.47 b | 28.26 b | |
25 | 27.70 a | 27.08 a | 27.12 a | 27.38 a | 26.84 a | 27.24 a | |
130 | 0 | 17.67 a | 17.33 a | 17.37 a | 17.30 a | 17.29 a | 17.48 a |
5 | 17.09 a | 16.92 a | 16.84 a | 16.84 a | 16.90 a | 16.99 a | |
15 | 16.64 a | 16.47 a | 16.53 a | 16.39 a | 16.54 a | 16.52 a | |
25 | 16.40 a | 16.21 a | 16.31 a | 16.26 a | 16.34 a | 16.34 a |
Table 1 Effects of different treatments on soil temperature
移栽后天数/ d | 土壤深度/ cm | 土壤温度/℃ | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | ||
40 | 0 | 26.28 c | 26.41 c | 26.67 c | 28.46 a | 27.58 b | 28.62 a |
5 | 25.76 c | 26.13 c | 26.22 c | 28.13 ab | 27.56 b | 28.42 a | |
15 | 24.37 d | 24.97 c | 24.88 cd | 26.17 b | 26.42 ab | 26.92 a | |
25 | 23.61 b | 24.14 b | 24.13 b | 24.83 a | 25.26 a | 25.18 a | |
70 | 0 | 31.85 a | 30.29 b | 30.13 b | 30.40 b | 30.04 b | 30.35 b |
5 | 31.79 a | 29.42 bc | 29.53 bc | 28.94 c | 29.42 ab | 29.74 b | |
15 | 30.21 a | 28.14 bc | 28.35 bc | 28.00 c | 28.28 bc | 28.66 b | |
25 | 28.56 a | 27.28 b | 27.51 b | 27.19 b | 27.45 b | 27.64 b | |
100 | 0 | 31.63 a | 30.59 bc | 30.57 bc | 31.29 ab | 30.48 bc | 30.14 c |
5 | 30.97 a | 29.42 b | 29.59 b | 30.12 ab | 29.64 b | 29.34 b | |
15 | 29.79 a | 28.33 b | 28.52 b | 28.94 ab | 28.47 b | 28.26 b | |
25 | 27.70 a | 27.08 a | 27.12 a | 27.38 a | 26.84 a | 27.24 a | |
130 | 0 | 17.67 a | 17.33 a | 17.37 a | 17.30 a | 17.29 a | 17.48 a |
5 | 17.09 a | 16.92 a | 16.84 a | 16.84 a | 16.90 a | 16.99 a | |
15 | 16.64 a | 16.47 a | 16.53 a | 16.39 a | 16.54 a | 16.52 a | |
25 | 16.40 a | 16.21 a | 16.31 a | 16.26 a | 16.34 a | 16.34 a |
移栽后天数/ d | 深度/ cm | 土壤湿度/% | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | ||
40 | 0 | 72.22 b | 80.44 a | 79.67 a | 80.22 a | 79.11 a | 80.89 a |
5 | 80.11 d | 86.56 bc | 89.22 a | 85.89 bc | 84.78 c | 88.11 ab | |
15 | 95.00 a | 92.56 ab | 94.11 ab | 92.44 b | 91.89 b | 94.11 ab | |
25 | 98.44 a | 98.11 a | 97.89 a | 98.00 a | 98.67 a | 99.00 a | |
70 | 0 | 86.38 a | 85.88 a | 86.13 a | 84.50 a | 84.50 a | 85.88 a |
5 | 88.63 a | 87.13 a | 87.88 a | 88.63 a | 88.38 a | 88.38 a | |
15 | 94.75 a | 95.13 a | 94.88 a | 94.88 a | 95.13 a | 94.50 a | |
25 | 97.50 a | 96.25 a | 97.50 a | 98.50 a | 97.50 a | 97.50 a | |
100 | 0 | 85.78 a | 85.56 a | 84.67 a | 84.00 a | 84.22 a | 84.44 a |
5 | 88.00 a | 89.44 a | 88.33 a | 87.89 a | 89.33 a | 89.33 a | |
15 | 92.11 a | 91.89 a | 91.89 a | 91.11 a | 92.11 a | 92.56 a | |
25 | 96.00 a | 98.00 a | 97.40 a | 96.20 a | 97.20 a | 97.00 a | |
130 | 0 | 95.89 a | 95.22 a | 95.00 a | 95.11 a | 94.67 a | 94.67 a |
5 | 96.78 a | 97.22 a | 96.89 a | 96.89 a | 96.78 a | 96.89 a | |
15 | 98.33 a | 98.56 a | 98.33 a | 98.33 a | 98.33 a | 98.56 a | |
25 | 98.89 a | 98.89 a | 98.89 a | 98.78 a | 98.67 a | 98.78 a |
Table 2 Effects of different treatments on soil moisture
移栽后天数/ d | 深度/ cm | 土壤湿度/% | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | ||
40 | 0 | 72.22 b | 80.44 a | 79.67 a | 80.22 a | 79.11 a | 80.89 a |
5 | 80.11 d | 86.56 bc | 89.22 a | 85.89 bc | 84.78 c | 88.11 ab | |
15 | 95.00 a | 92.56 ab | 94.11 ab | 92.44 b | 91.89 b | 94.11 ab | |
25 | 98.44 a | 98.11 a | 97.89 a | 98.00 a | 98.67 a | 99.00 a | |
70 | 0 | 86.38 a | 85.88 a | 86.13 a | 84.50 a | 84.50 a | 85.88 a |
5 | 88.63 a | 87.13 a | 87.88 a | 88.63 a | 88.38 a | 88.38 a | |
15 | 94.75 a | 95.13 a | 94.88 a | 94.88 a | 95.13 a | 94.50 a | |
25 | 97.50 a | 96.25 a | 97.50 a | 98.50 a | 97.50 a | 97.50 a | |
100 | 0 | 85.78 a | 85.56 a | 84.67 a | 84.00 a | 84.22 a | 84.44 a |
5 | 88.00 a | 89.44 a | 88.33 a | 87.89 a | 89.33 a | 89.33 a | |
15 | 92.11 a | 91.89 a | 91.89 a | 91.11 a | 92.11 a | 92.56 a | |
25 | 96.00 a | 98.00 a | 97.40 a | 96.20 a | 97.20 a | 97.00 a | |
130 | 0 | 95.89 a | 95.22 a | 95.00 a | 95.11 a | 94.67 a | 94.67 a |
5 | 96.78 a | 97.22 a | 96.89 a | 96.89 a | 96.78 a | 96.89 a | |
15 | 98.33 a | 98.56 a | 98.33 a | 98.33 a | 98.33 a | 98.56 a | |
25 | 98.89 a | 98.89 a | 98.89 a | 98.78 a | 98.67 a | 98.78 a |
处理 | 茎长/cm | 茎粗/mm | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
40 d | 70 d | 100 d | 130 d | 40 d | 70 d | 100 d | 130 d | |
CK | 33.69 d | 79.59 c | 102.87 b | 125.58 b | 5.28 b | 9.06 c | 12.13 c | 14.38 c |
T1 | 39.84 c | 105.12 ab | 123.42 a | 151.75 a | 6.48 a | 10.55 ab | 14.84 a | 14.68 bc |
T2 | 40.97 bc | 109.07 a | 121.16 a | 152.00 a | 6.70 a | 10.27 ab | 14.46 ab | 14.28 c |
T3 | 39.06c | 106.07 ab | 117.65 a | 153.03 a | 6.80 a | 9.78 bc | 14.20 ab | 14.72 bc |
T4 | 43.03 ab | 101.62 b | 118.04 a | 154.47 a | 6.91 a | 11.03 a | 13.33 b | 15.78 ab |
T5 | 43.98 a | 108.18 ab | 120.46 a | 155.9 a | 6.26 a | 10.84 a | 13.59 b | 15.99 a |
处理 | 茎节数 | 分枝数 | ||||||
40 d | 70 d | 100 d | 130 d | 40 d | 70 d | 100 d | 130 d | |
CK | 18.11 c | 32.63 b | 42.75 a | 43.83 a | 7.67 c | 7.33 ab | 7.33 a | 6.78 a |
T1 | 22.33 a | 36.33 a | 42.67 a | 42.67 a | 12.78 a | 6.56 bc | 4.89 b | 4.13 c |
T2 | 20.44 b | 35.71 a | 41.17 a | 42.33 a | 11.89 ab | 6.22 c | 5.11 b | 4.88 bc |
T3 | 21.56 ab | 34.89 a | 41.20 a | 42.20 a | 11.89 ab | 6.00 c | 5.33 b | 4.89 bc |
T4 | 21.78 ab | 31.30 b | 40.14 a | 43.67 a | 11.11 b | 6.89 bc | 5.44 b | 5.11 b |
T5 | 20.67 b | 32.89 b | 42.25 a | 44.50 a | 11.56 b | 8.00 a | 7.89 a | 6.78 a |
Table 3 Effects of different treatments on the growth of sweet potato branches
处理 | 茎长/cm | 茎粗/mm | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
40 d | 70 d | 100 d | 130 d | 40 d | 70 d | 100 d | 130 d | |
CK | 33.69 d | 79.59 c | 102.87 b | 125.58 b | 5.28 b | 9.06 c | 12.13 c | 14.38 c |
T1 | 39.84 c | 105.12 ab | 123.42 a | 151.75 a | 6.48 a | 10.55 ab | 14.84 a | 14.68 bc |
T2 | 40.97 bc | 109.07 a | 121.16 a | 152.00 a | 6.70 a | 10.27 ab | 14.46 ab | 14.28 c |
T3 | 39.06c | 106.07 ab | 117.65 a | 153.03 a | 6.80 a | 9.78 bc | 14.20 ab | 14.72 bc |
T4 | 43.03 ab | 101.62 b | 118.04 a | 154.47 a | 6.91 a | 11.03 a | 13.33 b | 15.78 ab |
T5 | 43.98 a | 108.18 ab | 120.46 a | 155.9 a | 6.26 a | 10.84 a | 13.59 b | 15.99 a |
处理 | 茎节数 | 分枝数 | ||||||
40 d | 70 d | 100 d | 130 d | 40 d | 70 d | 100 d | 130 d | |
CK | 18.11 c | 32.63 b | 42.75 a | 43.83 a | 7.67 c | 7.33 ab | 7.33 a | 6.78 a |
T1 | 22.33 a | 36.33 a | 42.67 a | 42.67 a | 12.78 a | 6.56 bc | 4.89 b | 4.13 c |
T2 | 20.44 b | 35.71 a | 41.17 a | 42.33 a | 11.89 ab | 6.22 c | 5.11 b | 4.88 bc |
T3 | 21.56 ab | 34.89 a | 41.20 a | 42.20 a | 11.89 ab | 6.00 c | 5.33 b | 4.89 bc |
T4 | 21.78 ab | 31.30 b | 40.14 a | 43.67 a | 11.11 b | 6.89 bc | 5.44 b | 5.11 b |
T5 | 20.67 b | 32.89 b | 42.25 a | 44.50 a | 11.56 b | 8.00 a | 7.89 a | 6.78 a |
处理 | 干物质量/g | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
40 d | 70 d | 100 d | 130 d | |
CK | 487 c | 2 494 c | 6 717 c | 10 443 b |
T1 | 1 339 b | 5 705 ab | 14 356 a | 17 868 a |
T2 | 1 352 b | 6 380 a | 12 837 ab | 16 825 a |
T3 | 1 424 b | 4 211 b | 11 622 ab | 18 460 a |
T4 | 2 122 a | 5 885 a | 14 478 a | 18 295 a |
T5 | 845 c | 4 253 b | 9 849 bc | 17 046 a |
Table 4 Effect of different treatments on dry matter accumulation of sweet potato
处理 | 干物质量/g | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
40 d | 70 d | 100 d | 130 d | |
CK | 487 c | 2 494 c | 6 717 c | 10 443 b |
T1 | 1 339 b | 5 705 ab | 14 356 a | 17 868 a |
T2 | 1 352 b | 6 380 a | 12 837 ab | 16 825 a |
T3 | 1 424 b | 4 211 b | 11 622 ab | 18 460 a |
T4 | 2 122 a | 5 885 a | 14 478 a | 18 295 a |
T5 | 845 c | 4 253 b | 9 849 bc | 17 046 a |
处理 | 有效株数 | 单株结薯数 | 单薯重/kg | 产量/(kg·hm-2) | 较CK增产/% | 商品薯率/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 37.08 b | 3.30 a | 0.36 c | 38 544 c | 0 | 61.33 c |
T1 | 45.96 a | 3.83 a | 0.39 bc | 57 414 b | 48.96 | 80.20 a |
T2 | 44.21 a | 3.50 a | 0.85 a | 67 654 a | 75.52 | 80.01 a |
T3 | 46.57 a | 4.16 a | 0.38 bc | 63 380 ab | 64.44 | 80.03 a |
T4 | 43.13 a | 4.00 a | 0.64 ab | 56 220 b | 45.86 | 78.61 a |
T5 | 30.00 c | 3.00 a | 0.64 ab | 56 054 b | 45.43 | 70.45 b |
Table 5 Effect of different treatments on yield and its components of sweet potato
处理 | 有效株数 | 单株结薯数 | 单薯重/kg | 产量/(kg·hm-2) | 较CK增产/% | 商品薯率/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 37.08 b | 3.30 a | 0.36 c | 38 544 c | 0 | 61.33 c |
T1 | 45.96 a | 3.83 a | 0.39 bc | 57 414 b | 48.96 | 80.20 a |
T2 | 44.21 a | 3.50 a | 0.85 a | 67 654 a | 75.52 | 80.01 a |
T3 | 46.57 a | 4.16 a | 0.38 bc | 63 380 ab | 64.44 | 80.03 a |
T4 | 43.13 a | 4.00 a | 0.64 ab | 56 220 b | 45.86 | 78.61 a |
T5 | 30.00 c | 3.00 a | 0.64 ab | 56 054 b | 45.43 | 70.45 b |
处理 | 移栽后40 d | 移栽后70 d | 移栽后100 d | 移栽后130 d |
---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
T2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
T3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
T4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
T5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Table 6 Grades of mulch film degradation rates
处理 | 移栽后40 d | 移栽后70 d | 移栽后100 d | 移栽后130 d |
---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
T2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
T3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
T4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
T5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
[1] | 杜社妮, 白岗栓. 玉米地膜覆盖的土壤环境效应[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2007, 25(5): 56-59. |
[2] | 李江辉, 贾峥嵘, 王凌云, 等. 甘薯垄作覆膜的增温保墒效果及其对产量的影响[J]. 山西农业科学, 2016, 44(4): 494-497. |
[3] | 李雪英, 朱海波, 刘刚, 等. 地膜覆盖对甘薯垄内温度和产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2012(1): 121-123. |
[4] | 陈登峰, 王秀茹, 杜韬, 等. 东北黑土区覆膜滴灌下田间微气候和作物生长特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2016, 30(4): 296-302, 317. |
[5] | 汪宝卿, 杜召海, 解备涛, 等. 地膜覆盖对土壤水分和夏薯苗期根系建成的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2014, 46(2): 41-45, 51. |
[6] | 马志民, 刘兰服, 姚海兰, 等. 不同覆膜方式对甘薯生长发育的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2012, 21(5): 103-107. |
[7] | 刘莉莎, 何素兰, 李育明, 等. 四川丘陵地区地膜覆盖对甘薯营养生长和产量的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2015, 43(5): 82-84. |
[8] | 王庆美. 紫甘薯产量和品质形成生理机制及对弱光、地膜覆盖响应研究[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2007. |
[9] | 王振振. 地膜覆盖影响甘薯块根形成和膨大的生理基础[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2012. |
[10] | 解备涛, 汪宝卿, 王庆美, 等. 甘薯地膜覆盖研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2013, 29(36): 28-32. |
[11] | 李云, 宋吉轩, 石乔龙. 覆膜对甘薯生长发育和产量的影响[J]. 南方农业学报, 2012, 43(8): 1124-1128. |
[12] | 李云, 李晓慧, 宋吉轩, 等. 甘薯不同垄宽条件下的滴灌试验研究[J]. 江西农业学报, 2015, 27(8): 21-24. |
[13] | 马蕾, 吕金良. 我国农用地膜使用现状及回收机制研究[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2019(11): 19-23. |
[14] | 韩文贺, 朱昆仑, 刘子语, 等. 山东典型薯田中氧化生物双降解地膜残留特点研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2019, 47(10): 67-69. |
[15] | 张丹, 王雪力, 王怡, 等. 土壤中残膜量及分布状态对玉米种子萌发特性的影响[J]. 赤峰学院学报(自然科学版), 2019, 35(11): 33-35. |
[16] | 刘艳霞. 中国农村地膜残留污染现状及治理对策思考[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2014. |
[17] | 刘敏, 黄占斌, 杨玉姣. 可生物降解地膜的研究进展与发展趋势[J]. 中国农学通报, 2008, 24(9): 439-443. |
[18] | 梁志虎. 不同可降解农用地膜对土壤环境的影响研究[J]. 中国水土保持, 2018(7): 31-33, 69. |
[19] | 白慧义, 杨立城, 王生, 等. 降解膜在马铃薯全膜覆盖栽培生产上应用探讨[J]. 青海农技推广, 2016(1): 48-49. |
[20] | 杨相昆, 魏建军, 张占琴, 等. 可降解地膜对棉田土壤温湿度的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2015, 28(4): 1736-1741. |
[21] | 高旭华, 陈明周, 黄瑶珠, 等. 生物降解膜覆盖马铃薯增产机理研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(17): 140-144. |
[22] | 梅丽, 董雯怡, 周继华, 等. 生物降解地膜的性能及在北京鲜食玉米和甘薯生产上的应用[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2021, 26(10): 54-65. |
[23] | 石晓昀, 刘明慧, 杨武娟, 等. 甘薯可降解地膜覆盖栽培技术研究进展[J]. 中国种业, 2020(11): 25-28. |
[24] | 肖强, 叶文景, 朱珠, 等. 利用数码相机和Photoshop软件非破坏性测定叶面积的简便方法[J]. 生态学杂志, 2005, 24(6): 711-714. |
[25] | 员学锋, 吴普特, 汪有科. 地膜覆盖保墒灌溉的土壤水、热以及作物效应研究[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2006, 25(1): 25-29. |
[26] | 董秀荣, 王荣堂. 地膜覆盖作物农田光温效应研究[J]. 长江大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 8(2): 220-222. |
[27] | HOU F Y, ZHANG L M, XIE B T, et al. Effect of plastic mulching on the photosynthetic capacity, endogenous hormones and root yield of summer-sown sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L). Lam.) in Northern China[J]. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 2015, 37(8): 164. |
[28] | 史春余, 王振林, 余松烈. 土壤通气性对甘薯产量的影响及其生理机制[J]. 中国农业科学, 2001, 34(2): 173-178. |
[29] | 江苏省农业科学院, 山东省农业科学院. 中国甘薯栽培学[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 1984. |
[30] | BRODHAGEN M, GOLDBERGER J R, HAYES D G, et al. Policy considerations for limiting unintended residual plastic in agricultural soils[J]. Environmental Science & Policy, 2017, 69: 81-84. |
[31] | QI R M, JONES D L, LI Z, et al. Behavior of microplastics and plastic film residues in the soil environment: a critical review[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 703: 134722. |
[32] | 刘姝彤, 张宝时, 金胜利, 等. 不同全生物可降解地膜降解特征及其对马铃薯产量的影响[J]. 中国农技推广, 2019, 35(12): 65-68. |
[33] | 赵桂涛, 刘中聚, 王世伟, 等. 甘薯田间降解膜试验分析[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2018, 57(1): 16-18. |
[1] | WANG Weiwei, WU Yongcheng, MEI Yi, YOU Chun, ZU Yanxia, SHEN Feng, LIU Zhe, ZHANG Lina, FENG Ruchao, ZHENG Jiaqiu. Impacts of organic fertilizer replacing chemical fertilizer on yield and soil properties of pepper [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(5): 1062-1065. |
[2] | TENG Liyao, FAN Chenggen, ZHANG Zuqing, LI Yun, LIU Yang, XIAO Peng, HUA Liqin, OUYANG Weiwei, XU Xiaojuan, CHEN Ronghua. Comprehensive agronomic traits and yield analysis of new peanut varieties [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(5): 1066-1071. |
[3] | YUE Yani, WANG Ying, GAO Xianyi, TAO Yujia, LIN Tingwei, LIU Shudong, XU Jingcheng, QI Huijuan. Effects of fruit number on yield and quality of melon cultivated in greenhouse [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(5): 1082-1086. |
[4] | CHEN Yanhua, SUN Lian, LU Yan, HU Liang, LI Fangyong, HAN Kefeng. Effect of earthworm organic liquid fertilizer on strawberry growth [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(5): 1087-1090. |
[5] | WANG Dongqun, CHENG Meiling, WANG Li. Absorption characteristics of N,P, K,Fe,Cu and Mn in cabbage Chunfeng 007 [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(5): 1104-1108. |
[6] | CAI Pan, ZHANG Liquan, SHI Nuyi, QI Zirong, XU Linying. Planting density experiment of three different ginger varieties [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(5): 1133-1137. |
[7] | CHEN Xiang, XU Lijun, QIAN Zhongming, HONG Meiping, HUANG Jiaqi, HE Kuangyi, WU Lingen, ZHUANG Haifeng, HU Meihua. Degradation characteristics of full biodegradable mulch film and its effect on soil physicochemical properties and benefits of early spring potato [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(5): 1138-1144. |
[8] | YANG Dehai, MA Junjie, PENG Xiaoci, ZHAO Weijin, XIE Yiyan, YANG Yan, FENG Canhu, PENG Ren, HUANG Wei, XUE Bo, WANG Yannan, OUYANG Chengren. Effects of different topping measures on yield and quality of K326 in Dali tobacco-growing areas [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(5): 1163-1166. |
[9] | ZHANG Quanfeng, LIU Cheng, JIANG Cong, ZHANG Yaofeng, NI Xiyuan, SHI Jianghua, WANG Tanliu, YU Huasheng, FU Ying. New multi-resistant, high-quality, mechanization-suitable rapeseed variety Zheyouza 59 [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(5): 1181-1184. |
[10] | ZHANG Xinyue, YE Shenghai, DONG Junjie, FU Haowei, LI Youfa. Breeding of new indica-japonica hybrid rice combination Zhejingjiayou 710 with high yield and good quality [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(4): 830-833. |
[11] | QIAN Yanjie, LI Cheng, YAO Yanhong, HU Mingyong, WANG Wei, JIANG Yu, LUO Wei, XIAO Feifei, WANG Shaoxi. Selection experiment of high-yield regenerated rice varieties suitable for Changsha Region [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(4): 848-853. |
[12] | TAO Ruofu, XIA Ruda. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer reduction combined with foliar silicon fertilizer on agronomic traits and yield of Huazheyou 261 [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(4): 854-857. |
[13] | LIU Guoqun, ZHU Chunquan, LIU Xiaoxia, LI Ronghui, YAN Wenting, SUN Xiuhua, SHANG Xiaolan, ZHU Lianfeng, TIAN Wenhao, ZHANG Junhua. Effects of different new fertilizer application on yield and quality of rice [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(4): 858-862. |
[14] | LI Shufen, CHAI Wenbo, XU Hanyuan, ZHU Qing, LI Hongtao, YUAN Chao, WANG Jun. Analysis of high yield and stable yield of silage maize in Huanghuaihai Region based on GGE biplot [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(4): 863-868. |
[15] | LIANG Mingran, DENG Qiwen, YAN Xiancheng, HUANG Dongrui, LIN Xiaonan, WANG Gangfeng, MAI Jiaqi. Screening test of high-quality fresh waxy corn varieties in Zhaoqing City [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(4): 874-878. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||