doi:10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20221139

Abstract

CLC Number:

S667.6

Figures/Tables 3

References 16

[1]	卓燕. 东魁杨梅的优质高产栽培技术[J]. 农业与技术, 2020, 40(18): 103-105.
[2]	倪海枝, 陈方永, 王引, 等. 东魁杨梅优质丰产栽培技术概述[J]. 浙江柑橘, 2019, 36(2): 26-30.
[3]	孙钧. 浙江省杨梅产业现状与发展对策[J]. 浙江柑橘, 2005, 22(4): 34-36.
[4]	王剑, 王嵘, 俞浙萍, 等. 不同杀菌剂对衰弱病杨梅营养生长和果实品质提升的影响[J]. 云南农业科技, 2022(3): 6-10.
[5]	颜丽菊, 罗冬芳, 陈钦红, 等. 不同药剂防治东魁杨梅肉葱病效果研究[J]. 现代农业科技, 2011(19): 187-188.
[6]	陈祖枝. 福安市杨梅肉葱病发生特点调查研究[J]. 现代农业科技, 2018(19): 137-138.
[7]	梁森苗, 任海英, 郑锡良, 等. 浙江杨梅病虫害种类及其为害部位[J]. 中国南方果树, 2017, 46(5): 28-30.
[8]	林文才. 杨梅生产中生理性问题与病虫害治理方案探讨[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2017, 37(2): 30-32.
[9]	申继忠, 余武秀. 如何证明植物生物刺激剂的功效声明[J]. 世界农药, 2022, 44(5): 6-14,28.
[10]	谢尚强, 王文霞, 张付云, 等. 植物生物刺激素研究进展[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2019, 35(3): 487-496.
[11]	颜丽菊, 罗冬芳, 陈钦红, 等. 不同药剂防治东魁杨梅肉葱病效果研究[J]. 现代农业科技, 2011(19): 187-188.
[12]	陈方永, 倪海枝, 王引, 等. 杨梅肉葱病腐烂病发病情况调查与防治对策研究[J]. 中国南方果树, 2011, 40(5): 53-55.
[13]	包日在, 俞浙萍, 张淑文, 等. 东魁杨梅肉葱病果实矿质元素和内源激素的变化分析[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2022, 63(10): 2372-2376.
[14]	孟赐福, 曹志洪, 姜培坤, 等. 杨梅的需钾特性及施钾对杨梅的增产效应[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2006(5): 46-48.
[15]	吴益伟, 孟赐福, 傅庆林, 等. 成龄木叶杨梅树需肥量的初步研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 1995, 7(4): 301-303.
[16]	梁森苗, 郭秀珠, 郑锡良, 等. 杨梅结果树各器官的矿质营养特性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(10): 1669-1677.

处理	病情指数	可溶性固形物含量
T1,美梅1 000倍	23.50±2.97 b	11.41±0.34 a
T2,丽维格500倍	22.68±5.01 b	11.06±0.23 a
CK,对照组	37.08±4.12 a	11.13±0.26 a
F、P	F=3.846,P<0.05	F=0.415,P>0.05

处理	病情指数	可溶性固形物含量
T1,美梅1 000倍	23.50±2.97 b	11.41±0.34 a
T2,丽维格500倍	22.68±5.01 b	11.06±0.23 a
CK,对照组	37.08±4.12 a	11.13±0.26 a
F、P	F=3.846,P<0.05	F=0.415,P>0.05

果实情况	处理	钾元素含量	钙元素含量	镁元素含量	锌元素含量	磷元素含量	硼元素含量
正常果	美梅1 000倍	1 470.56±12.58 a	24.31±2.50 e	41.89±3.66 a	0.90±0.03 a	40.96±0.96 a	1.37±0.14 a
	丽维格500倍	1 420.53±5.67 ab	38.14±1.85 d	35.28±3.76 a	0.89±0.02 a	36.98±3.16 a	1.35±0.14 a
	对照组	1 367.32±25.90 bc	45.20±1.09 c	34.61±1.28 a	0.98±0.01 a	46.71±3.25 a	1.43±0.16 a
肉葱果	美梅1 000倍	1 400.15±32.13 abc	67.17±1.22 b	38.78±1.65 a	0.87±0.03 a	35.65±3.47 a	1.04±0.02 a
	丽维格500倍	1 310.39±43.83 c	61.13±1.70 b	31.05±3.54 a	0.90±0.02 a	40.64±5.34 a	1.19±0.11 a
	对照组	1 210.40±34.86 d	100.32±2.88 a	31.87±1.45 a	0.89±0.01 a	40.02±0.19 a	1.26±0.08 a
F、P		F=10.096, P<0.05	F=180.397, P<0.05	F=2.192, P>0.05	F=1.998, P>0.05	F=1.432, P>0.05	F=1.323, P>0.05

果实情况	处理	钾元素含量	钙元素含量	镁元素含量	锌元素含量	磷元素含量	硼元素含量
正常果	美梅1 000倍	1 470.56±12.58 a	24.31±2.50 e	41.89±3.66 a	0.90±0.03 a	40.96±0.96 a	1.37±0.14 a
	丽维格500倍	1 420.53±5.67 ab	38.14±1.85 d	35.28±3.76 a	0.89±0.02 a	36.98±3.16 a	1.35±0.14 a
	对照组	1 367.32±25.90 bc	45.20±1.09 c	34.61±1.28 a	0.98±0.01 a	46.71±3.25 a	1.43±0.16 a
肉葱果	美梅1 000倍	1 400.15±32.13 abc	67.17±1.22 b	38.78±1.65 a	0.87±0.03 a	35.65±3.47 a	1.04±0.02 a
	丽维格500倍	1 310.39±43.83 c	61.13±1.70 b	31.05±3.54 a	0.90±0.02 a	40.64±5.34 a	1.19±0.11 a
	对照组	1 210.40±34.86 d	100.32±2.88 a	31.87±1.45 a	0.89±0.01 a	40.02±0.19 a	1.26±0.08 a
F、P		F=10.096, P<0.05	F=180.397, P<0.05	F=2.192, P>0.05	F=1.998, P>0.05	F=1.432, P>0.05	F=1.323, P>0.05

叶片来源	处理	钾元素含量	钙元素含量	镁元素含量	锌元素含量	磷元素含量	硼元素含量
正常果叶片	美梅1 000倍	5 950.14±206.13 a	5 090.37±52.20 e	404.67±67.75 a	29.50±2.68 a	219.06±7.78 a	44.75±1.16 a
	丽维格500倍	6 510.18±300.29 a	6 310.13±5.83 c	463.98±75.53 a	27.26±1.36 a	234.50±4.71 a	44.29±0.47 a
	对照组	6 450.15±223.41 a	6 380.41±46.39 bc	482.98±82.14 a	25.76±2.17 a	228.36±2.99 a	43.46±2.11 a
肉葱果叶片	美梅1 000倍	6 220.27±179.71 a	5 730.31±17.16 d	595.25±42.70 a	23.33±0.13 a	240.65±2.25 a	44.30±0.81 a
	丽维格500倍	6 170.19±172.77 a	6 450.09±10.34 b	545.60±25.32 a	28.52±3.38 a	219.98±6.12 a	43.78±1.32 a
	对照组	6 520.26±150.09 a	7 020.26±11.53 a	393.19±69.15 a	24.37±0.32 a	220.60±3.76 a	46.20±0.76 a
F、P		F=2.249, P>0.05	F=490.001, P<0.05	F=1.534, P>0.05	F=1.364, P>0.05	F=0.737, P>0.05	F=0.613, P>0.05

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 3

References 16

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	YING Zhengzheng, ZHANG Jianbin, WU Shijun, ZHANG Shuwen, YU Zheping, SUN Li, LIANG Senmiao, WU Yuyong. Effect of facility cultivation on the quality and benefit of Myrica rubra [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(3): 670-674.
[2]	YING Zhengzheng, WANG Shouhua, ZHANG Jianbin, WU Shijun, YE Fang, WU Yuyong. Production model and ecological functions of the composite cultivation system of ancient bayberry-tea tree in Xianju [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(1): 67-71.
[3]	LIANG Senmiao, YU Zheping, SONG Yang, ZHOU Shu, ZHANG Shuwen. Effect of full steel pipe vertical trellis on the yield and fruit quality of Chinese bayberry [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(12): 2952-2955.
[4]	LI Chenhao, KONG Haimin, LI Gang, HAO Yue, REN Haiying, WANG Jing, CHEN Yupei, YAN Jun, LIN Baoyi. Study on the effects of rapeseed cake organic fertilizer on soil fertility regulation and tree vigor improvement in facility cultivation bayberry orchards [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(11): 2668-2674.
[5]	YING Junjie, YING Zhengzheng, SHEN Ying, LIU Xiaotong, ZHANG Zhijun, ZHANG Juan, XIANG Jiaqing, GU Huifen, HUANG Jun. Effect of different green measures of prevention and control on bayberry Drosophila [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(5): 1221-1226.
[6]	YING Zhengzheng, REN Haiying, ZHANG Jianbin, SHI Wei, WU Yuyong, WANG Qi, WU Shijun. Effect of Bacillus preparation on the prevention and control of fruit rot disease and fruit quality in greenhouse bayberry [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(5): 1227-1231.
[7]	LIANG Senmiao, YU Zheping, WANG Jingbo, SUN Li, QI Xingjiang, ZHANG Shuwen. Efficacy of low sugar to vinegar ratio attractants against fruit flies on Chinese bayberry [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(3): 697-701.
[8]	LIU Chenxing, CAO Yan, XIA Qile. Effects of different drying treatments on the structure and activity of polysaccharides from Biqi bayberry pomace [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(2): 467-470.
[9]	LAN Haiyan, QIU Zhongcan, DING Fei, QI Xingjiang, QIU Dongliang, ZHENG Xiliang, LIANG Senmiao, ZHANG Shuwen. Effect of greenhouse facilities on the flowering and fruit quality of Myrica rubra [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(1): 115-119.
[10]	YU Zheping, ZHANG Shuwen, LIANG Senmiao, SUN Li, REN Haiying, ZHENG Xiliang, QI Xingjiang. Effects of three inducers on the resistance of twig blight disease and fruit quality of Chinese bayberry [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(12): 2921-2924.
[11]	HONG Leidong, HONG Chunlai, ZHU Weijing, ZHU Fengxiang, WANG Weiping, ZHANG Shuwen, SUN Li, ZOU Xiuqin, QI Xingjiang, YAO Yanlai. Effect of specialized bio-organic fertilizer on soil improvement and fruit quality enhancement in declined Chinese bayberry [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(11): 2617-2622.
[12]	YU Zheping, LIANG Senmiao, ZHANG Shuwen, SUN Li, ZHENG Xiliang, REN Haiying, SHAN Linwen, QI Xingjiang. Effect of accompanying plants on soil nutrients and fruit quality of Myrica rubra [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(10): 2434-2437.
[13]	ZHENG Xiliang, SUN Li, QI Xingjiang, LIANG Senmiao, YU Zheping, ZHANG Qi, ZHANG Shuwen. Correlation analysis between fruit quality indicators and soil fertility factors in Chinese bayberry [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(9): 2112-2118.
[14]	SUN Li, ZHANG Shuwen, YU Zheping, ZHENG Xiliang, QI Xingjiang. Research progress on the protected cultivation and intelligent management technology of Myrica rubra [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(9): 2119-2124.
[15]	TANG Xujun, WU Mengjiao, FENG Xingli, LI Shuangwei, XU Minjie, HAN Kaiyuan, HUA Shan. Research and application of facilities, mechanization, and digital production technology for Chinese red bayberry [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(8): 1770-1775.