Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2024, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (3): 505-512.DOI: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20230147
Previous Articles Next Articles
XIN Haibin(), YANG Xuqing, XU Ruiheng, WANG Ying, ZHANG Yan, FAN Xiaokai
Received:
2023-02-25
Online:
2024-03-11
Published:
2024-04-08
CLC Number:
XIN Haibin, YANG Xuqing, XU Ruiheng, WANG Ying, ZHANG Yan, FAN Xiaokai. Effects of different fertilization patterns of three slow-releasefertilizers on wheat yield and economic benefits[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(3): 505-512.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnykx.cn/EN/10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20230147
播期 (月-日) | 处理 | 基肥 | 分蘖肥 | 孕穗肥 | N | P2O5 | K2O | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
尿素 | 复合肥 | 汉枫 | 沃夫特 | 茂施 | 尿素 | 汉枫 | 尿素 | 复合肥 | 汉枫 | |||||
11-05 | 1 | 0 | 40.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10.4 | 0 | 12.4 | 10.0 | 0 | 18.0 | 7.5 | 7.5 |
2 | 0 | 0 | 69.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18.0 | 8.3 | 8.3 | |
3 | 0 | 0 | 41.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15.7 | 0 | 0 | 18.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | |
4 | 6.2 | 0 | 30.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12.4 | 10.0 | 0 | 18.0 | 5.1 | 5.1 | |
5 | 0 | 0 | 41.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18.0 | 8.3 | 8.3 | |
6 | 0 | 0 | 37.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24.9 | 16.2 | 7.5 | 7.5 | |
7 | 0 | 0 | 37.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24.9 | 0 | 0 | 16.2 | 4.5 | 4.5 | |
8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 43.2 | 15.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18.0 | 6.5 | 2.6 | |
9 | 7.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30.0 | 0 | 0 | 12.4 | 10.0 | 0 | 18.0 | 6.0 | 3.3 | |
10 | 7.2 | 0 | 0 | 30.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12.4 | 10.0 | 0 | 18.0 | 6.0 | 3.3 | |
11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 43.2 | 0 | 15.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18.0 | 6.5 | 2.6 | |
CK | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
12-01 | 1 | 0 | 40.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10.4 | 0 | 12.4 | 10.0 | 0 | 18.0 | 7.5 | 7.5 |
2 | 0 | 0 | 69.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18.0 | 8.3 | 8.3 | |
3 | 0 | 0 | 41.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15.7 | 0 | 0 | 18.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | |
4 | 6.2 | 0 | 30.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12.4 | 10.0 | 0 | 18.0 | 5.1 | 5.1 | |
5 | 0 | 0 | 41.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18.0 | 8.3 | 8.3 | |
6 | 0 | 0 | 37.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24.9 | 16.2 | 7.5 | 7.5 | |
7 | 0 | 0 | 37.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24.9 | 0 | 0 | 16.2 | 4.5 | 4.5 | |
8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 43.2 | 15.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18.0 | 6.5 | 2.6 | |
9 | 7.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30.0 | 0 | 0 | 12.4 | 10.0 | 0 | 18.0 | 6.0 | 3.3 | |
10 | 7.2 | 0 | 0 | 30.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12.4 | 10.0 | 0 | 18.0 | 6.0 | 3.3 | |
11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 43.2 | 0 | 15.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18.0 | 6.5 | 2.6 | |
CK | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Table 1 667 m2 fertilization rate under different treatments
播期 (月-日) | 处理 | 基肥 | 分蘖肥 | 孕穗肥 | N | P2O5 | K2O | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
尿素 | 复合肥 | 汉枫 | 沃夫特 | 茂施 | 尿素 | 汉枫 | 尿素 | 复合肥 | 汉枫 | |||||
11-05 | 1 | 0 | 40.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10.4 | 0 | 12.4 | 10.0 | 0 | 18.0 | 7.5 | 7.5 |
2 | 0 | 0 | 69.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18.0 | 8.3 | 8.3 | |
3 | 0 | 0 | 41.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15.7 | 0 | 0 | 18.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | |
4 | 6.2 | 0 | 30.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12.4 | 10.0 | 0 | 18.0 | 5.1 | 5.1 | |
5 | 0 | 0 | 41.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18.0 | 8.3 | 8.3 | |
6 | 0 | 0 | 37.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24.9 | 16.2 | 7.5 | 7.5 | |
7 | 0 | 0 | 37.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24.9 | 0 | 0 | 16.2 | 4.5 | 4.5 | |
8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 43.2 | 15.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18.0 | 6.5 | 2.6 | |
9 | 7.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30.0 | 0 | 0 | 12.4 | 10.0 | 0 | 18.0 | 6.0 | 3.3 | |
10 | 7.2 | 0 | 0 | 30.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12.4 | 10.0 | 0 | 18.0 | 6.0 | 3.3 | |
11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 43.2 | 0 | 15.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18.0 | 6.5 | 2.6 | |
CK | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
12-01 | 1 | 0 | 40.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10.4 | 0 | 12.4 | 10.0 | 0 | 18.0 | 7.5 | 7.5 |
2 | 0 | 0 | 69.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18.0 | 8.3 | 8.3 | |
3 | 0 | 0 | 41.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15.7 | 0 | 0 | 18.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | |
4 | 6.2 | 0 | 30.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12.4 | 10.0 | 0 | 18.0 | 5.1 | 5.1 | |
5 | 0 | 0 | 41.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18.0 | 8.3 | 8.3 | |
6 | 0 | 0 | 37.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24.9 | 16.2 | 7.5 | 7.5 | |
7 | 0 | 0 | 37.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24.9 | 0 | 0 | 16.2 | 4.5 | 4.5 | |
8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 43.2 | 15.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18.0 | 6.5 | 2.6 | |
9 | 7.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30.0 | 0 | 0 | 12.4 | 10.0 | 0 | 18.0 | 6.0 | 3.3 | |
10 | 7.2 | 0 | 0 | 30.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12.4 | 10.0 | 0 | 18.0 | 6.0 | 3.3 | |
11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 43.2 | 0 | 15.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18.0 | 6.5 | 2.6 | |
CK | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
播期 (月-日) | 处理 | 667 m2茎蘖数/万 | 出苗率/ % | 茎蘖 成穗率/% | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
基本苗 | 12月17日 | 1月17日 | 2月17日 | 3月17日 | 成熟期 | ||||
11-05 | 1 | 16.14 | 21.49 | 24.32 | 50.41 | 42.40 | 29.98 | 58.69 | 59.47 |
2 | 16.55 | 23.35 | 23.83 | 49.64 | 43.14 | 30.01 | 60.18 | 60.46 | |
3 | 16.51 | 22.22 | 21.44 | 47.46 | 45.91 | 29.18 | 60.04 | 61.48 | |
4 | 16.02 | 22.01 | 19.46 | 47.99 | 46.62 | 30.14 | 58.25 | 62.80 | |
5 | 15.91 | 22.65 | 20.53 | 46.02 | 45.57 | 29.65 | 57.85 | 64.43 | |
6 | 15.91 | 22.64 | 19.81 | 41.46 | 39.09 | 28.54 | 57.85 | 68.84 | |
7 | 16.23 | 21.58 | 18.76 | 43.94 | 37.97 | 28.75 | 59.02 | 65.43 | |
8 | 16.47 | 23.04 | 18.99 | 46.96 | 41.45 | 29.71 | 59.89 | 63.27 | |
9 | 16.60 | 22.55 | 19.36 | 42.73 | 49.70 | 29.61 | 60.36 | 69.30 | |
10 | 16.00 | 22.90 | 20.12 | 43.34 | 43.57 | 29.87 | 58.18 | 68.92 | |
11 | 16.62 | 23.01 | 18.84 | 41.83 | 44.17 | 29.71 | 60.44 | 67.26 | |
CK | 16.34 | 17.32 | 16.67 | 26.52 | 33.33 | 18.34 | 59.42 | 55.03 | |
12-01 | 1 | 20.76 | 20.76 | 43.37 | 40.17 | 31.08 | 51.90 | 71.66 | |
2 | 20.51 | 20.51 | 47.23 | 40.79 | 30.95 | 51.28 | 65.53 | ||
3 | 20.88 | 20.88 | 49.36 | 40.48 | 30.84 | 52.20 | 62.48 | ||
4 | 20.98 | 20.98 | 50.39 | 35.54 | 30.48 | 52.45 | 60.49 | ||
5 | 20.52 | 20.52 | 46.27 | 38.93 | 31.16 | 51.30 | 67.34 | ||
6 | 20.43 | 20.43 | 41.21 | 44.80 | 30.26 | 51.08 | 73.43 | ||
7 | 20.76 | 20.76 | 40.90 | 37.70 | 29.81 | 51.90 | 72.89 | ||
8 | 20.47 | 20.47 | 45.45 | 36.46 | 30.81 | 51.18 | 67.79 | ||
9 | 20.21 | 20.21 | 48.74 | 34.92 | 31.03 | 50.53 | 63.66 | ||
10 | 20.83 | 20.83 | 47.83 | 42.19 | 30.22 | 52.08 | 63.18 | ||
11 | 20.44 | 20.44 | 46.88 | 40.79 | 29.68 | 51.10 | 63.31 | ||
CK | 20.38 | 20.38 | 24.41 | 32.44 | 18.41 | 50.95 | 56.75 |
Table 2 Effects of different treatments on stem tillering dynamics of wheat
播期 (月-日) | 处理 | 667 m2茎蘖数/万 | 出苗率/ % | 茎蘖 成穗率/% | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
基本苗 | 12月17日 | 1月17日 | 2月17日 | 3月17日 | 成熟期 | ||||
11-05 | 1 | 16.14 | 21.49 | 24.32 | 50.41 | 42.40 | 29.98 | 58.69 | 59.47 |
2 | 16.55 | 23.35 | 23.83 | 49.64 | 43.14 | 30.01 | 60.18 | 60.46 | |
3 | 16.51 | 22.22 | 21.44 | 47.46 | 45.91 | 29.18 | 60.04 | 61.48 | |
4 | 16.02 | 22.01 | 19.46 | 47.99 | 46.62 | 30.14 | 58.25 | 62.80 | |
5 | 15.91 | 22.65 | 20.53 | 46.02 | 45.57 | 29.65 | 57.85 | 64.43 | |
6 | 15.91 | 22.64 | 19.81 | 41.46 | 39.09 | 28.54 | 57.85 | 68.84 | |
7 | 16.23 | 21.58 | 18.76 | 43.94 | 37.97 | 28.75 | 59.02 | 65.43 | |
8 | 16.47 | 23.04 | 18.99 | 46.96 | 41.45 | 29.71 | 59.89 | 63.27 | |
9 | 16.60 | 22.55 | 19.36 | 42.73 | 49.70 | 29.61 | 60.36 | 69.30 | |
10 | 16.00 | 22.90 | 20.12 | 43.34 | 43.57 | 29.87 | 58.18 | 68.92 | |
11 | 16.62 | 23.01 | 18.84 | 41.83 | 44.17 | 29.71 | 60.44 | 67.26 | |
CK | 16.34 | 17.32 | 16.67 | 26.52 | 33.33 | 18.34 | 59.42 | 55.03 | |
12-01 | 1 | 20.76 | 20.76 | 43.37 | 40.17 | 31.08 | 51.90 | 71.66 | |
2 | 20.51 | 20.51 | 47.23 | 40.79 | 30.95 | 51.28 | 65.53 | ||
3 | 20.88 | 20.88 | 49.36 | 40.48 | 30.84 | 52.20 | 62.48 | ||
4 | 20.98 | 20.98 | 50.39 | 35.54 | 30.48 | 52.45 | 60.49 | ||
5 | 20.52 | 20.52 | 46.27 | 38.93 | 31.16 | 51.30 | 67.34 | ||
6 | 20.43 | 20.43 | 41.21 | 44.80 | 30.26 | 51.08 | 73.43 | ||
7 | 20.76 | 20.76 | 40.90 | 37.70 | 29.81 | 51.90 | 72.89 | ||
8 | 20.47 | 20.47 | 45.45 | 36.46 | 30.81 | 51.18 | 67.79 | ||
9 | 20.21 | 20.21 | 48.74 | 34.92 | 31.03 | 50.53 | 63.66 | ||
10 | 20.83 | 20.83 | 47.83 | 42.19 | 30.22 | 52.08 | 63.18 | ||
11 | 20.44 | 20.44 | 46.88 | 40.79 | 29.68 | 51.10 | 63.31 | ||
CK | 20.38 | 20.38 | 24.41 | 32.44 | 18.41 | 50.95 | 56.75 |
播期 (月-日) | 处理 | 叶龄 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12月17日 | 1月17日 | 2月17日 | 3月17日 | 成熟期 | ||
11-05 | 1 | 3.7 | 4.9 | 6.5 | 9.8 | 10.9 |
2 | 3.9 | 5.2 | 6.8 | 9.8 | 11.0 | |
3 | 3.7 | 4.9 | 6.7 | 9.8 | 11.2 | |
4 | 3.7 | 4.9 | 6.7 | 9.6 | 11.1 | |
5 | 3.7 | 4.9 | 6.6 | 9.6 | 11.0 | |
6 | 3.7 | 4.8 | 6.5 | 9.8 | 10.9 | |
7 | 3.7 | 4.8 | 6.5 | 9.8 | 10.9 | |
8 | 3.7 | 4.9 | 6.9 | 10.0 | 11.3 | |
9 | 3.7 | 4.9 | 6.9 | 9.5 | 11.1 | |
10 | 3.7 | 4.9 | 6.8 | 9.9 | 11.0 | |
11 | 3.7 | 4.9 | 6.8 | 9.6 | 11.0 | |
CK | 3.5 | 4.6 | 6.1 | 9.4 | 10.6 | |
12-01 | 1 | 2.3 | 5.3 | 7.2 | 9.9 | |
2 | 2.5 | 5.4 | 7.3 | 9.9 | ||
3 | 2.4 | 5.3 | 7.2 | 10.0 | ||
4 | 2.3 | 5.2 | 7.1 | 10.0 | ||
5 | 2.4 | 5.2 | 7.2 | 9.9 | ||
6 | 2.4 | 5.2 | 7.1 | 9.8 | ||
7 | 2.4 | 5.2 | 7.1 | 9.8 | ||
8 | 2.4 | 5.2 | 7.2 | 10.0 | ||
9 | 2.4 | 5.2 | 7.1 | 10.0 | ||
10 | 2.4 | 5.2 | 7.2 | 10.0 | ||
11 | 2.4 | 5.1 | 7.3 | 10.0 | ||
CK | 2.4 | 4.9 | 6.8 | 9.6 |
Table 3 Effect of different treatments on leaf age of wheat
播期 (月-日) | 处理 | 叶龄 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12月17日 | 1月17日 | 2月17日 | 3月17日 | 成熟期 | ||
11-05 | 1 | 3.7 | 4.9 | 6.5 | 9.8 | 10.9 |
2 | 3.9 | 5.2 | 6.8 | 9.8 | 11.0 | |
3 | 3.7 | 4.9 | 6.7 | 9.8 | 11.2 | |
4 | 3.7 | 4.9 | 6.7 | 9.6 | 11.1 | |
5 | 3.7 | 4.9 | 6.6 | 9.6 | 11.0 | |
6 | 3.7 | 4.8 | 6.5 | 9.8 | 10.9 | |
7 | 3.7 | 4.8 | 6.5 | 9.8 | 10.9 | |
8 | 3.7 | 4.9 | 6.9 | 10.0 | 11.3 | |
9 | 3.7 | 4.9 | 6.9 | 9.5 | 11.1 | |
10 | 3.7 | 4.9 | 6.8 | 9.9 | 11.0 | |
11 | 3.7 | 4.9 | 6.8 | 9.6 | 11.0 | |
CK | 3.5 | 4.6 | 6.1 | 9.4 | 10.6 | |
12-01 | 1 | 2.3 | 5.3 | 7.2 | 9.9 | |
2 | 2.5 | 5.4 | 7.3 | 9.9 | ||
3 | 2.4 | 5.3 | 7.2 | 10.0 | ||
4 | 2.3 | 5.2 | 7.1 | 10.0 | ||
5 | 2.4 | 5.2 | 7.2 | 9.9 | ||
6 | 2.4 | 5.2 | 7.1 | 9.8 | ||
7 | 2.4 | 5.2 | 7.1 | 9.8 | ||
8 | 2.4 | 5.2 | 7.2 | 10.0 | ||
9 | 2.4 | 5.2 | 7.1 | 10.0 | ||
10 | 2.4 | 5.2 | 7.2 | 10.0 | ||
11 | 2.4 | 5.1 | 7.3 | 10.0 | ||
CK | 2.4 | 4.9 | 6.8 | 9.6 |
播期 (月-日) | 处理 | 株高/ cm | 穗下节间 长/cm | 穗长/ cm | 节间数 | (穗下节间长+ 穗长)/株高/% | 结实小穗 排数 | 退化小穗 排数 | 退化小穗 排数占比/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
11-05 | 1 | 84.5 | 32.6 | 9.6 | 4.7 | 49.8 | 18.0 | 2.5 | 12.2 |
2 | 82.6 | 31.2 | 8.5 | 4.9 | 48.1 | 16.8 | 3.3 | 16.4 | |
3 | 82.5 | 31.0 | 9.6 | 4.8 | 49.2 | 17.6 | 2.5 | 12.4 | |
4 | 83.9 | 32.3 | 9.8 | 4.7 | 50.2 | 18.0 | 2.4 | 11.8 | |
5 | 86.5 | 34.4 | 9.7 | 4.8 | 51.0 | 18.4 | 2.3 | 11.1 | |
6 | 82.0 | 31.1 | 9.2 | 4.6 | 49.1 | 17.6 | 2.7 | 13.3 | |
7 | 80.8 | 31.3 | 9.0 | 4.5 | 49.9 | 17.3 | 2.9 | 14.4 | |
8 | 81.3 | 31.3 | 9.3 | 4.9 | 49.9 | 17.1 | 2.7 | 13.6 | |
9 | 84.8 | 33.3 | 9.7 | 4.6 | 50.6 | 17.8 | 1.8 | 9.2 | |
10 | 83.8 | 32.9 | 9.4 | 4.9 | 50.4 | 17.9 | 2.4 | 11.8 | |
11 | 79.0 | 30.6 | 8.5 | 4.6 | 49.5 | 16.3 | 2.5 | 13.3 | |
CK | 66.5 | 26.7 | 5.2 | 3.9 | 48.0 | 10.1 | 5.6 | 35.7 | |
12-01 | 1 | 79.6 | 30.7 | 8.7 | 4.5 | 49.5 | 17.9 | 1.8 | 9.1 |
2 | 77.8 | 30.1 | 7.8 | 4.3 | 48.7 | 16.6 | 1.9 | 10.3 | |
3 | 79.4 | 30.9 | 8.4 | 4.8 | 49.5 | 17.2 | 2.3 | 11.8 | |
4 | 80.6 | 32.0 | 8.8 | 4.7 | 50.6 | 17.9 | 1.3 | 6.8 | |
5 | 80.2 | 31.7 | 8.6 | 4.8 | 50.2 | 17.5 | 1.9 | 9.8 | |
6 | 78.7 | 28.5 | 8.1 | 4.7 | 46.5 | 16.8 | 2.1 | 11.1 | |
7 | 78.8 | 30.8 | 8.0 | 4.7 | 49.2 | 17.0 | 1.9 | 10.1 | |
8 | 79.1 | 30.9 | 8.4 | 4.6 | 49.7 | 17.1 | 2.0 | 10.5 | |
9 | 81.8 | 32.1 | 9.1 | 4.4 | 50.3 | 18.0 | 1.7 | 8.6 | |
10 | 79.3 | 31.2 | 8.8 | 4.2 | 50.4 | 18.1 | 1.8 | 9.0 | |
11 | 77.2 | 28.6 | 8.1 | 4.3 | 47.6 | 17.6 | 2.2 | 11.1 | |
CK | 58.7 | 23.1 | 4.9 | 3.5 | 47.7 | 9.5 | 5.0 | 34.5 |
Table 4 Effects of different treatments on plant traits of wheat
播期 (月-日) | 处理 | 株高/ cm | 穗下节间 长/cm | 穗长/ cm | 节间数 | (穗下节间长+ 穗长)/株高/% | 结实小穗 排数 | 退化小穗 排数 | 退化小穗 排数占比/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
11-05 | 1 | 84.5 | 32.6 | 9.6 | 4.7 | 49.8 | 18.0 | 2.5 | 12.2 |
2 | 82.6 | 31.2 | 8.5 | 4.9 | 48.1 | 16.8 | 3.3 | 16.4 | |
3 | 82.5 | 31.0 | 9.6 | 4.8 | 49.2 | 17.6 | 2.5 | 12.4 | |
4 | 83.9 | 32.3 | 9.8 | 4.7 | 50.2 | 18.0 | 2.4 | 11.8 | |
5 | 86.5 | 34.4 | 9.7 | 4.8 | 51.0 | 18.4 | 2.3 | 11.1 | |
6 | 82.0 | 31.1 | 9.2 | 4.6 | 49.1 | 17.6 | 2.7 | 13.3 | |
7 | 80.8 | 31.3 | 9.0 | 4.5 | 49.9 | 17.3 | 2.9 | 14.4 | |
8 | 81.3 | 31.3 | 9.3 | 4.9 | 49.9 | 17.1 | 2.7 | 13.6 | |
9 | 84.8 | 33.3 | 9.7 | 4.6 | 50.6 | 17.8 | 1.8 | 9.2 | |
10 | 83.8 | 32.9 | 9.4 | 4.9 | 50.4 | 17.9 | 2.4 | 11.8 | |
11 | 79.0 | 30.6 | 8.5 | 4.6 | 49.5 | 16.3 | 2.5 | 13.3 | |
CK | 66.5 | 26.7 | 5.2 | 3.9 | 48.0 | 10.1 | 5.6 | 35.7 | |
12-01 | 1 | 79.6 | 30.7 | 8.7 | 4.5 | 49.5 | 17.9 | 1.8 | 9.1 |
2 | 77.8 | 30.1 | 7.8 | 4.3 | 48.7 | 16.6 | 1.9 | 10.3 | |
3 | 79.4 | 30.9 | 8.4 | 4.8 | 49.5 | 17.2 | 2.3 | 11.8 | |
4 | 80.6 | 32.0 | 8.8 | 4.7 | 50.6 | 17.9 | 1.3 | 6.8 | |
5 | 80.2 | 31.7 | 8.6 | 4.8 | 50.2 | 17.5 | 1.9 | 9.8 | |
6 | 78.7 | 28.5 | 8.1 | 4.7 | 46.5 | 16.8 | 2.1 | 11.1 | |
7 | 78.8 | 30.8 | 8.0 | 4.7 | 49.2 | 17.0 | 1.9 | 10.1 | |
8 | 79.1 | 30.9 | 8.4 | 4.6 | 49.7 | 17.1 | 2.0 | 10.5 | |
9 | 81.8 | 32.1 | 9.1 | 4.4 | 50.3 | 18.0 | 1.7 | 8.6 | |
10 | 79.3 | 31.2 | 8.8 | 4.2 | 50.4 | 18.1 | 1.8 | 9.0 | |
11 | 77.2 | 28.6 | 8.1 | 4.3 | 47.6 | 17.6 | 2.2 | 11.1 | |
CK | 58.7 | 23.1 | 4.9 | 3.5 | 47.7 | 9.5 | 5.0 | 34.5 |
播期 (月-日) | 处理 | 667 m2有效 穗数/万 | 每穗实粒数 | 千粒重/ g | 667 m2理论 产量/kg | 667 m2实际 产量/kg | 较常规施肥 产量±/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
11-05 | 1 | 29.98 | 39.1 | 40.16 | 470.8 | 425.8 | 0.0 |
2 | 30.01 | 37.4 | 39.66 | 445.1 | 394.9 | -7.3 | |
3 | 29.18 | 39.9 | 40.51 | 471.7 | 422.5 | -0.8 | |
4 | 30.14 | 40.9 | 40.04 | 493.6 | 446.6 | 4.9 | |
5 | 29.65 | 39.9 | 42.00 | 496.9 | 453.4 | 6.5 | |
6 | 28.54 | 39.6 | 40.19 | 454.2 | 409.7 | -3.8 | |
7 | 28.75 | 39.2 | 40.11 | 452.0 | 406.4 | -4.6 | |
8 | 29.71 | 38.6 | 40.33 | 462.5 | 417.3 | -2.0 | |
9 | 29.61 | 39.4 | 41.54 | 484.6 | 431.4 | 1.3 | |
10 | 29.87 | 38.6 | 41.53 | 478.8 | 429.6 | 0.9 | |
11 | 29.71 | 38.0 | 40.18 | 453.0 | 398.7 | -6.4 | |
CK | 18.34 | 29.3 | 38.50 | 206.9 | 181.2 | -57.4 | |
12-01 | 1 | 31.08 | 38.6 | 37.98 | 455.6 | 411.1 | 0.0 |
2 | 30.95 | 34.6 | 38.55 | 412.8 | 370.4 | -9.9 | |
3 | 30.84 | 37.3 | 38.04 | 437.6 | 390.8 | -4.9 | |
4 | 30.48 | 38.9 | 38.84 | 460.5 | 416.6 | 1.3 | |
5 | 31.16 | 38.0 | 37.99 | 449.8 | 403.0 | -2.0 | |
6 | 30.26 | 37.4 | 38.08 | 431.0 | 386.5 | -6.0 | |
7 | 29.81 | 38.7 | 36.60 | 422.2 | 383.0 | -6.8 | |
8 | 30.81 | 37.6 | 38.26 | 442.2 | 387.4 | -5.8 | |
9 | 31.03 | 39.0 | 38.51 | 466.0 | 420.8 | 2.4 | |
10 | 30.22 | 39.3 | 37.85 | 449.5 | 403.5 | -1.8 | |
11 | 29.68 | 38.5 | 37.03 | 423.1 | 380.6 | -7.4 | |
CK | 18.41 | 28.1 | 35.20 | 182.1 | 163.1 | -60.3 |
Table 5 Effects of different treatments on wheat yield and its constituent factors
播期 (月-日) | 处理 | 667 m2有效 穗数/万 | 每穗实粒数 | 千粒重/ g | 667 m2理论 产量/kg | 667 m2实际 产量/kg | 较常规施肥 产量±/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
11-05 | 1 | 29.98 | 39.1 | 40.16 | 470.8 | 425.8 | 0.0 |
2 | 30.01 | 37.4 | 39.66 | 445.1 | 394.9 | -7.3 | |
3 | 29.18 | 39.9 | 40.51 | 471.7 | 422.5 | -0.8 | |
4 | 30.14 | 40.9 | 40.04 | 493.6 | 446.6 | 4.9 | |
5 | 29.65 | 39.9 | 42.00 | 496.9 | 453.4 | 6.5 | |
6 | 28.54 | 39.6 | 40.19 | 454.2 | 409.7 | -3.8 | |
7 | 28.75 | 39.2 | 40.11 | 452.0 | 406.4 | -4.6 | |
8 | 29.71 | 38.6 | 40.33 | 462.5 | 417.3 | -2.0 | |
9 | 29.61 | 39.4 | 41.54 | 484.6 | 431.4 | 1.3 | |
10 | 29.87 | 38.6 | 41.53 | 478.8 | 429.6 | 0.9 | |
11 | 29.71 | 38.0 | 40.18 | 453.0 | 398.7 | -6.4 | |
CK | 18.34 | 29.3 | 38.50 | 206.9 | 181.2 | -57.4 | |
12-01 | 1 | 31.08 | 38.6 | 37.98 | 455.6 | 411.1 | 0.0 |
2 | 30.95 | 34.6 | 38.55 | 412.8 | 370.4 | -9.9 | |
3 | 30.84 | 37.3 | 38.04 | 437.6 | 390.8 | -4.9 | |
4 | 30.48 | 38.9 | 38.84 | 460.5 | 416.6 | 1.3 | |
5 | 31.16 | 38.0 | 37.99 | 449.8 | 403.0 | -2.0 | |
6 | 30.26 | 37.4 | 38.08 | 431.0 | 386.5 | -6.0 | |
7 | 29.81 | 38.7 | 36.60 | 422.2 | 383.0 | -6.8 | |
8 | 30.81 | 37.6 | 38.26 | 442.2 | 387.4 | -5.8 | |
9 | 31.03 | 39.0 | 38.51 | 466.0 | 420.8 | 2.4 | |
10 | 30.22 | 39.3 | 37.85 | 449.5 | 403.5 | -1.8 | |
11 | 29.68 | 38.5 | 37.03 | 423.1 | 380.6 | -7.4 | |
CK | 18.41 | 28.1 | 35.20 | 182.1 | 163.1 | -60.3 |
播期 (月-日) | 处理 | 667 m2实收 产量/kg | 单价/ (元·kg-1) | 667 m2成本构成/元 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
种子 | 肥料 | 农药 | 机械 | 人工 | 租金 | ||||
11-05 | 1 | 425.8 | 2.4 | 44 | 175.26 | 61 | 174 | 30 | 320 |
2 | 394.9 | 2.4 | 44 | 228.46 | 61 | 164 | 30 | 320 | |
3 | 422.5 | 2.4 | 44 | 173.08 | 61 | 169 | 30 | 320 | |
4 | 446.6 | 2.4 | 44 | 164.78 | 61 | 169 | 30 | 320 | |
5 | 453.4 | 2.4 | 44 | 234.01 | 61 | 169 | 30 | 320 | |
6 | 409.7 | 2.4 | 44 | 210.61 | 61 | 169 | 30 | 320 | |
7 | 406.4 | 2.4 | 44 | 155.79 | 61 | 169 | 30 | 320 | |
8 | 417.3 | 2.4 | 44 | 180.00 | 61 | 169 | 30 | 320 | |
9 | 431.4 | 2.4 | 44 | 173.08 | 61 | 169 | 30 | 320 | |
10 | 429.6 | 2.4 | 44 | 173.08 | 61 | 169 | 30 | 320 | |
11 | 398.7 | 2.4 | 44 | 155.79 | 61 | 169 | 30 | 320 | |
CK | 181.2 | 2.4 | 44 | 0 | 61 | 159 | 30 | 320 | |
12-01 | 1 | 411.1 | 2.4 | 70 | 175.26 | 50 | 167 | 30 | 320 |
2 | 370.4 | 2.4 | 70 | 228.46 | 50 | 157 | 30 | 320 | |
3 | 390.8 | 2.4 | 70 | 173.08 | 50 | 162 | 30 | 320 | |
4 | 416.6 | 2.4 | 70 | 164.78 | 50 | 162 | 30 | 320 | |
5 | 403.0 | 2.4 | 70 | 234.01 | 50 | 162 | 30 | 320 | |
6 | 386.5 | 2.4 | 70 | 210.61 | 50 | 162 | 30 | 320 | |
7 | 383.0 | 2.4 | 70 | 155.79 | 50 | 162 | 30 | 320 | |
8 | 387.4 | 2.4 | 70 | 180.00 | 50 | 162 | 30 | 320 | |
9 | 420.8 | 2.4 | 70 | 173.08 | 50 | 162 | 30 | 320 | |
10 | 403.5 | 2.4 | 70 | 173.08 | 50 | 162 | 30 | 320 | |
11 | 380.6 | 2.4 | 70 | 155.79 | 50 | 162 | 30 | 320 | |
CK | 163.1 | 2.4 | 70 | 0 | 50 | 152 | 30 | 320 |
Table 6 Effect of different treatments on economic benefits of wheat
播期 (月-日) | 处理 | 667 m2实收 产量/kg | 单价/ (元·kg-1) | 667 m2成本构成/元 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
种子 | 肥料 | 农药 | 机械 | 人工 | 租金 | ||||
11-05 | 1 | 425.8 | 2.4 | 44 | 175.26 | 61 | 174 | 30 | 320 |
2 | 394.9 | 2.4 | 44 | 228.46 | 61 | 164 | 30 | 320 | |
3 | 422.5 | 2.4 | 44 | 173.08 | 61 | 169 | 30 | 320 | |
4 | 446.6 | 2.4 | 44 | 164.78 | 61 | 169 | 30 | 320 | |
5 | 453.4 | 2.4 | 44 | 234.01 | 61 | 169 | 30 | 320 | |
6 | 409.7 | 2.4 | 44 | 210.61 | 61 | 169 | 30 | 320 | |
7 | 406.4 | 2.4 | 44 | 155.79 | 61 | 169 | 30 | 320 | |
8 | 417.3 | 2.4 | 44 | 180.00 | 61 | 169 | 30 | 320 | |
9 | 431.4 | 2.4 | 44 | 173.08 | 61 | 169 | 30 | 320 | |
10 | 429.6 | 2.4 | 44 | 173.08 | 61 | 169 | 30 | 320 | |
11 | 398.7 | 2.4 | 44 | 155.79 | 61 | 169 | 30 | 320 | |
CK | 181.2 | 2.4 | 44 | 0 | 61 | 159 | 30 | 320 | |
12-01 | 1 | 411.1 | 2.4 | 70 | 175.26 | 50 | 167 | 30 | 320 |
2 | 370.4 | 2.4 | 70 | 228.46 | 50 | 157 | 30 | 320 | |
3 | 390.8 | 2.4 | 70 | 173.08 | 50 | 162 | 30 | 320 | |
4 | 416.6 | 2.4 | 70 | 164.78 | 50 | 162 | 30 | 320 | |
5 | 403.0 | 2.4 | 70 | 234.01 | 50 | 162 | 30 | 320 | |
6 | 386.5 | 2.4 | 70 | 210.61 | 50 | 162 | 30 | 320 | |
7 | 383.0 | 2.4 | 70 | 155.79 | 50 | 162 | 30 | 320 | |
8 | 387.4 | 2.4 | 70 | 180.00 | 50 | 162 | 30 | 320 | |
9 | 420.8 | 2.4 | 70 | 173.08 | 50 | 162 | 30 | 320 | |
10 | 403.5 | 2.4 | 70 | 173.08 | 50 | 162 | 30 | 320 | |
11 | 380.6 | 2.4 | 70 | 155.79 | 50 | 162 | 30 | 320 | |
CK | 163.1 | 2.4 | 70 | 0 | 50 | 152 | 30 | 320 |
[1] | DIMKPA C O, FUGICE J, SINGH U, et al. Development of fertilizers for enhanced nitrogen use efficiency-Trends and perspectives[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 731: 139113. |
[2] | 胡铁军, 张怀杰, 郑佩君, 等. 3种缓控释肥在双季稻上的应用效果比较[J]. 上海农业科技, 2019(6): 96-97. |
[3] | 刘兆辉, 吴小宾, 谭德水, 等. 一次性施肥在我国主要粮食作物中的应用与环境效应[J]. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(20): 3827-3839. |
[4] | 程金秋, 朱盈, 魏海燕, 等. 缓控释肥料在水稻上的应用效果综述[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2017, 45(17): 11-15. |
[5] | 贵会平, 宋美珍, 李健, 等. 缓/控释肥发展现状及在棉花上的应用前景[J]. 中国棉花, 2016, 43(8): 16-20. |
[6] | 郑文魁, 李成亮, 窦兴霞, 等. 不同包膜类型控释氮肥对小麦产量及土壤生化性质的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2016, 30(2): 162-167, 174. |
[7] | 卢艳丽, 白由路, 王磊, 等. 华北小麦—玉米轮作区缓控释肥应用效果分析[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2011, 17(1): 209-215. |
[8] | 宋亚栋. 不同缓控释肥对小麦产量品质与养分利用效率的影响[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2023. |
[9] | 刘春梅, 罗胜国, 刘元英. 控释尿素对春小麦根系活力和籽粒蛋白质含量的影响[J]. 黑龙江八一农垦大学学报, 2012, 24(4): 4-7. |
[10] | 党建友, 杨峰, 屈会选, 等. 复合包裹控释肥对小麦生长发育及土壤养分的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2008, 16(6):1365-1370. |
[11] | 翟彩娇, 崔士友, 张蛟, 等. 缓/控释肥发展现状及在农业生产中的应用前景[J]. 农学学报, 2022, 12(1): 22-27. |
[12] | 常凤, 王海标, 陶静静, 等. 减氮配施控释尿素对冬小麦产量及氮肥效率的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(25): 1-6. |
[13] | 宋挚, 范仲卿, 于晓东, 等. 不同控释期包膜尿素氮素释放对小麦氮素利用的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2020, 52(12): 51-58. |
[14] | 吴振宇, 周子军, 杨阳, 等. 新型缓释尿素的缓释特性及其在土壤中转化研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(6):84-90. |
[15] | 马泉, 唐紫妍, 王梦尧, 等. 树脂包膜缓释肥与尿素配施对稻茬冬小麦产量、氮肥利用率与效益的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2019, 39(10): 1202-1210. |
[16] | 刘苹, 李庆凯, 林海涛, 等. 不同缓控释肥对小麦产量、氮素吸收及氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2020, 52(2): 70-74. |
[17] | 顾颖慧, 刘虹丹, 刘文成, 等. 硫包衣缓释肥施用方式调控红皮强筋小麦产量、品质及氮效率的特征分析[J]. 南方农业学报, 2021, 52(9): 2382-2390. |
[18] | 张明伟, 马泉, 陈京都, 等. 缓控释肥在冬小麦上的应用研究进展及展望[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2022, 50(2): 15-21. |
[1] | ZHAI Wenxi, LI Xiangling, YANG Qing, WANG Jian, YANG Min, LIU Xueru, HAN Jinling. Dry matter accumulation characteristics of sweet potato cultivated with film mulching [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(3): 489-496. |
[2] | WANG Yanqin, LI Wuyang, MENG Xiangang, LUO Guanghong. Effects of Chlamydomonas debaryana powder on growth and physiological indices of wheat seedlings under salt stress [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(3): 497-504. |
[3] | JIANG Minhua, DING Yi, LI Kuan, MENG Haoran, PAN Yimin, ZHANG Chao. Effects of polyurethane coated slow-release fertilizers on yield and utilization efficiencies of nutrients of double-cropping rice [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(3): 521-524. |
[4] | ZHANG Huaijie, HU Tiejun, XU Rongrong. Effect of stable nitrogen fertilizer on economic characters and fertilizer utilization efficiency of Yongyou 15 [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(3): 531-535. |
[5] | HUANG Yechang, ZENG Wei, DENG Lizhang, KANG Yuliu, PAN Binrong. Experimental study on field fertilizer efficiency of fresh corn soil testing and formula fertilization in Wenzhou [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(3): 536-540. |
[6] | XIE Xiaocong, ZHENG Xiaokang, XU Xinxin, LI Xiaoli, SHI Liyun, BAO Rizai. Effect of partial substitution of chemical fertilizer with organic fertilizer on yield and nitrogen use efficiency of maize [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(3): 541-544. |
[7] | ZHANG Wenjun, ZHANG Qingfu, YANG Liu, SONG Jiajun, HE Jiguang, YANG Zaijun, XIONG Chengliang. Effects of different types of potassium fertilizer and application period on upper leaf quality of tobacco in Changsha [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(3): 549-554. |
[8] | ZHONG Yangmin, LIU Tingfu, LI Hanmei, LIU Chengwei, MA Ruifang, RUAN Meiying, WANG Linlin. Effects of different base fertilizer treatments on the growth and yield of vegetable broad beans [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(3): 567-570. |
[9] | ZENG Yannan, ZHAO Hanwei, JI Hongting, CHENG Rundong, WANG Shihong, WANG Yong, ZHAO Hejuan. Effects of uniconazole concentrations on the growth characteristics and yield of fresh sweet potato [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(3): 587-591. |
[10] | LI Huoliang, HAN Kefeng. Effect of comprehensive nutrient management model on yield and soil nutrient content of Vitis vinifera L. [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(3): 608-613. |
[11] | ZHENG Ting, WEI Lingzhu, QIAN Jichang, CHENG Jianhui, XIANG Jiang, WU Jiang. Fig quality and safety production technology [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(3): 627-632. |
[12] | FU Sheng, REN Jie, YANG Fengli. Effect of 9 herbicides on weed control effect and yield in single-cropping late rice direct seeding field [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(3): 657-660. |
[13] | CAI Xinyi, XIANG Binghan, PAN Sufeng, YING Junjie, YAN Chengjin. Weed community composition in the hilly wheat area of eastern Zhejiang Province [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(3): 661-666. |
[14] | ZHANG Fuqiang, ZHANG Hongjie, ZHANG Guo, YU Julong, WANG Junwen, QI Junsheng. Comparison of the application effects of two kinds of immune inducers and conventional agents in wheat [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(3): 672-675. |
[15] | Bo LI. Effect of exogenous substances on yield and quality of upper tobacco leaves [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(2): 301-306. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||