Suitability selection for different peach varieties and their performance traits in island areas

doi:10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20230866

Abstract

Abstract:

To optimize the peach variety structure in the Zhoushan island area, new and excellent peach varieties were introduced through experiments, and excellent varieties suitable for the island climate characteristics were screened to improve planting efficiency. In 2022, five peach varieties including Yuanmeng, Jinxia, Yufei, Zaoyou 1 and Zaoyou 2 were introduced in Dinghai District, Zhoushan City, with the conventional variety Hujingyulu as the control. The phenology, disease and pest development, growth and fruiting habits, and fruit economic characteristics of six peach varieties were observed to comprehensively evaluate their adaptability in island areas. The results showed that all five introduced peach varieties were suitable for promotion and cultivation in the Zhoushan island area. The soluble solid content was highest in the early maturing variety Jinxia, reaching 16.8%, and the maturity period was 15 days earlier than the control Hujingyulu; From the comparison of single plant yield, Yufei was the best, with a single fruit weight of 132 g and a single plant yield of 96 kg.

Key words: peach, Zhoushan, island, fruit quality, diseases and pests

CLC Number:

S662.1

Cite this article

LIU Jinglei, WANG Ming, ZHENG Renjie, YANG Shaona. Suitability selection for different peach varieties and their performance traits in island areas[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(12): 2911-2914.

share this article

Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: http://www.zjnykx.cn/EN/10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20230866

http://www.zjnykx.cn/EN/Y2024/V65/I12/2911

Figures/Tables 5

Table 1 Comparison of main phenological stages of peach trees of different varieties

品种	萌芽期 (月-日)	始花期 (月-日)	盛花期 (月-日)	成熟期 (月-日)
湖景玉露	03-22	04-05	04-10	07-05
圆梦	03-22	04-08	04-15	07-20
玉妃	03-15	03-26	04-01	07-11
金霞	03-15	03-24	03-29	06-20
早油1	03-13	03-24	03-30	06-01
早油2	03-16	03-26	03-30	06-02

Table 1 Comparison of main phenological stages of peach trees of different varieties

品种	萌芽期 (月-日)	始花期 (月-日)	盛花期 (月-日)	成熟期 (月-日)
湖景玉露	03-22	04-05	04-10	07-05
圆梦	03-22	04-08	04-15	07-20
玉妃	03-15	03-26	04-01	07-11
金霞	03-15	03-24	03-29	06-20
早油1	03-13	03-24	03-30	06-01
早油2	03-16	03-26	03-30	06-02

Table 2 Comparison of botanical traits of peach trees of different varieties

品种	树势	树姿	萌芽力	成枝力	成花难易	自花结实能力
湖景玉露	强健	易萌发侧枝	中等	中等	易	强
圆梦	强健	不易萌发侧枝	中等	中等	易	强
玉妃	强健	易萌发侧枝	强	强	易	强
金霞	强健	易萌发侧枝	强	强	易	强
早油1	强健	不易萌发侧枝	中等	中等	易	强
早油2	强健	不易萌发侧枝	中等	中等	易	强

Table 2 Comparison of botanical traits of peach trees of different varieties

品种	树势	树姿	萌芽力	成枝力	成花难易	自花结实能力
湖景玉露	强健	易萌发侧枝	中等	中等	易	强
圆梦	强健	不易萌发侧枝	中等	中等	易	强
玉妃	强健	易萌发侧枝	强	强	易	强
金霞	强健	易萌发侧枝	强	强	易	强
早油1	强健	不易萌发侧枝	中等	中等	易	强
早油2	强健	不易萌发侧枝	中等	中等	易	强

Table 3 Comparison of occurrence of diseases and pests in peach trees of different varieties

品种	穿孔病	缩叶病	褐腐病	桃小食心虫
湖景玉露	发生	发生	发生	发生
圆梦	发生	未发生	未发生	发生
玉妃	发生	未发生	未发生	发生
金霞	发生	未发生	未发生	发生
早油1	未发生	未发生	未发生	发生
早油2	未发生	未发生	未发生	发生

Table 3 Comparison of occurrence of diseases and pests in peach trees of different varieties

品种	穿孔病	缩叶病	褐腐病	桃小食心虫
湖景玉露	发生	发生	发生	发生
圆梦	发生	未发生	未发生	发生
玉妃	发生	未发生	未发生	发生
金霞	发生	未发生	未发生	发生
早油1	未发生	未发生	未发生	发生
早油2	未发生	未发生	未发生	发生

Table 4 Comparison of yield of peach trees of different varieties

品种	最大单果重/g	试验期单株产量/kg
湖景玉露	159	112
圆梦	139	92
玉妃	132	96
金霞	82	65
早油1	85	65
早油2	112	88

Table 4 Comparison of yield of peach trees of different varieties

品种	最大单果重/g	试验期单株产量/kg
湖景玉露	159	112
圆梦	139	92
玉妃	132	96
金霞	82	65
早油1	85	65
早油2	112	88

Table 5 Comparison of fruit quality of peach

品种	果香	果色	外观	可溶性固形物含量/%
湖景玉露	明显	粉红色	毛桃	13.7
圆梦	不明显	粉红色	毛桃	16.5
玉妃	不明显	深红色	毛桃	12.2
金霞	明显	深红色	油桃	16.8
早油1	明显	朱红色	油桃	11.8
早油2	明显	朱红色	油桃	12.2

Table 5 Comparison of fruit quality of peach

品种	果香	果色	外观	可溶性固形物含量/%
湖景玉露	明显	粉红色	毛桃	13.7
圆梦	不明显	粉红色	毛桃	16.5
玉妃	不明显	深红色	毛桃	12.2
金霞	明显	深红色	油桃	16.8
早油1	明显	朱红色	油桃	11.8
早油2	明显	朱红色	油桃	12.2

References 7

[1]	王力荣. 我国桃产业现状与发展建议[J]. 中国果树, 2021(10):1-5.
[2]	俞明亮, 王力荣, 王志强, 等. 新中国果树科学研究70年: 桃[J]. 果树学报, 2019, 36(10):1283-1291.
[3]	敖艳飞, 宋贞富, 肖祎, 等. 16个新优桃品种在安顺地区的引种试验[J]. 耕作与栽培, 2020, 40(5):59-61.
[4]	张建鹏. 5个早熟桃新品种引种栽培及果实品质分析[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2023 (5):244-247.
[5]	孙萍, 林贤锐, 沈建生, 等. 17个中晚熟桃品种在浙江金华的引种表现[J]. 中国南方果树, 2022, 51(1):166-170.
[6]	郑鹏华, 俞波, 曹武. 5个桃品种在浙北地区的比较评价[J]. 中国南方果树, 2022, 51(3):171-173.
[7]	王力荣, 朱更瑞. 桃种质资源描述规范和数据标准[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2005.

Related Articles 15

[1]	ZHENG Xiliang, SUN Li, QI Xingjiang, LIANG Senmiao, YU Zheping, ZHANG Qi, ZHANG Shuwen. Correlation analysis between fruit quality indicators and soil fertility factors in Chinese bayberry [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(9): 2112-2118.
[2]	FENG Renfang, WU Shaohui, LAN Liuxin. Study on the effect of water-soluble fertilizer on the quality of early-maturing Citrus unshiu Marc. cv. Miyagawa Wase [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(8): 1776-1780.
[3]	ZHANG Yubo, ZHANG Chengyi, LI Si, HE Yong, HE Yongchoulin, HU Meihua. Preliminary report of six new strawberry varieties planted in greenhouses in Fenghua District, Ningbo City [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(8): 1781-1785.
[4]	WEI Jiafeng, MA Xinyuan, ZHANG Ruiping. Effects of different application amount of silicon fertilizer on growth and fruit quality of apple [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(8): 1814-1820.
[5]	DI Huatao, LI Jinfeng, WAN Chunyan, CHEN Xueping, HUO Hengzhi, CHEN Bingyi. Effect of different composite substrate on growth and fruit quality of strawberry cultivar Benihoppe [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(8): 1821-1825.
[6]	SUN Li, ZHENG Xiliang, LIANG Senmiao, ZHANG Qi, YU Zheping, QI Xingjiang, ZHANG Shuwen. Differential analysis of soil factor affecting the formation of fruit quality in different Myric rubra varieties [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(8): 1826-1832.
[7]	ZHOU Jinghan. Comparative test of melon varieties in early spring in Zhoushan [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(5): 1079-1082.
[8]	LIU Jianwei, FANG Hanhan, NI Xiaoming, YU Xuan, XU Jie, NI Jianping, QIAN Yi, WANG Lifang, ZHU Luomei. Effects of different tree shape of peach tree on fruit yield, quality and agricultural production cost in the mountainous areas of northern Zhejiang [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(3): 614-617.
[9]	SUN Qinan, ZHANG Shuo, ZHU Weijing, CHEN Miaojin, GU Qing, ZHANG Xiaobin. Effects of different straw mulching patterns on the soil and fruit of peach orchards [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(3): 618-622.
[10]	ZHU Ming, ZHANG Yue, ZHANG Mingke. Effects of 5 microbial treatments on growth and fruit quality of Cucumis sativus L. [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(3): 680-684.
[11]	XIAO Yunpu, XU Lili, CHEN Xiangao, CAI Houcai, YE Yongfeng. Current situation, problems and countermeasures of marine ranch construction and management in Nanji Islands [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(3): 693-699.
[12]	YU Zheping, ZHANG Shuwen, LIANG Senmiao, SUN Li, REN Haiying, ZHENG Xiliang, QI Xingjiang. Effects of three inducers on the resistance of twig blight disease and fruit quality of Chinese bayberry [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(12): 2921-2924.
[13]	FAN Fangjuan, LIU Xubo, YANG Ji, YAN Fuhua, YANG Xianyu, TAN Xiaoliang. Introduction performance of peach variety Zhongtao 5 at different altitudes in Lishui [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(12): 2925-2927.
[14]	YANG Xinqin, WU Xinyi, LI Guojing, WU Xiaohua, WANG Jian, WANG Ying, LIU Tingfu, WANG Baogen. High quality and efficient cultivation mode of Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. based on environmentally-friendly control methods for disease and pest [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(12): 2972-2976.
[15]	HONG Leidong, HONG Chunlai, ZHU Weijing, ZHU Fengxiang, WANG Weiping, ZHANG Shuwen, SUN Li, ZOU Xiuqin, QI Xingjiang, YAO Yanlai. Effect of specialized bio-organic fertilizer on soil improvement and fruit quality enhancement in declined Chinese bayberry [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(11): 2617-2622.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Comments

Abstract
Figures/Tables
References
Related Articles
Recommended Articles
Metrics
Comments

TOP