Evaluation of contribution rate of plant protection to the prevention and control of wheat disease，pest，and weeds in Haiyan County，2024

doi:10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20250903

Abstract

Abstract:

To objectively evaluate the role of plant protection in wheat production，a field experiment was conducted in Haiyan County in 2024. Seven treatments were established，including no disease control，no pest control，one-time disease control，strict disease and pest control，farmer self-initiated control，unified control，and a blank control（no control of any diseases or pests）. The control effectiveness and plant protection contribution rates for wheat diseases and pests were comprehensively assessed. The results showed that the plant protection contribution rates for the treatments of no disease control，no pest control，one-time disease control，strict control，farmer self-initiated control，and unified control were 9.23%，30.31%，10.57%，36.98%，26.91%，and 28.64%，respectively. Based on a weighted calculation incorporating the area proportions of each control treatment type，the overall plant protection contribution rate for wheat disease and pest control in Haiyan County was determined to be 28.01%.

Key words: wheat disease and pests, control effect, plant protection contribution rate

CLC Number:

S435.12

Cite this article

LU Fang, SUN Xie, ZHU Xiaoqun, JIANG Chunyue. Evaluation of contribution rate of plant protection to the prevention and control of wheat disease，pest，and weeds in Haiyan County，2024[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(4): 976-979.

share this article

Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: http://www.zjnykx.cn/EN/10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20250903

http://www.zjnykx.cn/EN/Y2026/V67/I4/976

Figures/Tables 4

Table 1 Control effects of different treatments on major weed species

处理	猪秧秧		看麦娘		罔草		野老鹳草
处理	株防效	鲜重防效	株防效	鲜重防效	株防效	鲜重防效	株防效	鲜重防效
严格防治区	100.00	100.00	84.38	83.30	90.76	93.27	71.43	94.10
农民自防区	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00	98.32	98.96	100.00	100.00
统防统治区	100.00	100.00	91.67	92.21	99.16	99.61	100.00	100.00

Table 1 Control effects of different treatments on major weed species

处理	猪秧秧		看麦娘		罔草		野老鹳草
处理	株防效	鲜重防效	株防效	鲜重防效	株防效	鲜重防效	株防效	鲜重防效
严格防治区	100.00	100.00	84.38	83.30	90.76	93.27	71.43	94.10
农民自防区	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00	98.32	98.96	100.00	100.00
统防统治区	100.00	100.00	91.67	92.21	99.16	99.61	100.00	100.00

Table 2 Control effects of different treatments on wheat scab

病情

指数

Table 2 Control effects of different treatments on wheat scab

处理

病穗率/%

病穗防

效/%

病情

指数

病指防

效/%

一次防病区

4.67

70.83

1.33

78.38

完全不防治区

16.00

6.17

严格防治区

2.67

83.33

0.67

89.19

Table 3 Control effects of different treatments on wheat aphids

处理	平均百株蚜数量	防效/%
完全不防治区	79.96	0
农民自防区	2.12	97.35
统防统治区	27.68	65.38

Table 3 Control effects of different treatments on wheat aphids

处理	平均百株蚜数量	防效/%
完全不防治区	79.96	0
农民自防区	2.12	97.35
统防统治区	27.68	65.38

Table 4 Plant protection contribution rate for wheat disease，pest and weed control in Haiyan County

处理	667 m²产量/kg	挽回损失率/%	实际损失率/%	植保贡献率/%	面积占比/%
不防病区	207.30	9.23	27.75	9.23	0.02
不治虫区	267.78	30.31	6.67	30.31	0.03
完全不防治区	180.82	0	36.98	0	0.01
一次防病区	211.15	10.57	26.41	10.57	10.62
严格防治区	286.93	36.98	0	36.98	19.31
农民自防区	258.03	26.91	10.07	26.91	18.08
统防统治区	263.00	28.64	8.34	28.64	51.93

Table 4 Plant protection contribution rate for wheat disease，pest and weed control in Haiyan County

处理	667 m²产量/kg	挽回损失率/%	实际损失率/%	植保贡献率/%	面积占比/%
不防病区	207.30	9.23	27.75	9.23	0.02
不治虫区	267.78	30.31	6.67	30.31	0.03
完全不防治区	180.82	0	36.98	0	0.01
一次防病区	211.15	10.57	26.41	10.57	10.62
严格防治区	286.93	36.98	0	36.98	19.31
农民自防区	258.03	26.91	10.07	26.91	18.08
统防统治区	263.00	28.64	8.34	28.64	51.93

References 3

[1]	胡永伟. 小麦病虫草害发生特点与防控［J］. 农机市场，2023（11）：69-70.
	HU Y W. Occurrence characteristics and control of wheat diseases，pests and weeds［J］. Agricultural Machinery Market，2023（11）：69-70.
[2]	范向红. 小麦病虫草害发生特点与防控措施［J］. 新农业，2022（3）：4-5.
	FAN X H. Occurrence characteristics and control measures of wheat diseases，pests and weeds［J］. Modern Agriculture，2022（3）：4-5.
[3]	刘万才. 试论植物保护贡献率的测算方法［J］. 中国植保导刊，2021，41（8）：5-8.
	LIU W C. Discussion of the evaluation of plant protection contribution rate［J］. China Plant Protection，2021，41（8）：5-8.

Related Articles 15

[1]	TANG Yongyu, CHEN Guofa, YUAN Jiangcheng, LI Guoping, WANG Yanni, LI Zilin, LUO Yingkun, LI Chengjie, HE Biao. Evaluation of the control effect of 5 different pesticides on tobacco Meloidogyne disease [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(4): 970-975.
[2]	GU Tianfei, YING Junjie, TANG Sizhong, GU Huifen, CHEN Lingyong, XIANG Jiaqing, ZHU Guiping. Application effect of the key technology of "one spray and three preventions" at the wheat panicle stage in southeast Zhejiang of China [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(2): 449-454.
[3]	LIAN Jianjun, XU Hubin, CHENG Ying, ZHANG Junmei, CHEN Xugen, WU Qiqi, DENG Liangdong, JIAO Chen, LI Hongye. Screening of fungicides for control of citrus brown spot caused by Alternaria spp. [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(2): 455-462.
[4]	FENG Yifu, NI Ming, WANG Zhizhou, CHEN Hong, FANG Hui. Several types of stem and leaf herbicides for the control effect of weeds in wheat fields in southern Zhejiang [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(9): 2230-2234.
[5]	ZHANG Xin, ZHANG Chunhua, WANG Cheng, CHEN Guoqi. Study on the application effect of flufenacet in rice fields [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(9): 2208-2212.
[6]	QIAN Cheng, CHEN Zengqian, LIU Xiaotong, WEI Haohua, ZHANG Juan, WANG Ke, YU Xianwen, HUANG Jun. Analysis of the effect of five kinds of chemical agents on the emergency control of Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(6): 1456-1459.
[7]	YUAN Zhongqin, GU Guowei. Control effect of different fungicides on wheat scab and prospect for reducing dosage [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(5): 1216-1220.
[8]	LUO Qin, YAO Xiaoming, SHOU Menghui, ZHOU Yujie. Evaluation of different adjuvants on the control effect of rice diseases and insect pests by spraying drone [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(4): 986-991.
[9]	BAI Jianping, XU Weidong, LU Qiang, YAO Zhangliang. Field control effect of 40% prothioconazole·tebuconazole mixture on rice sheath blight [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(2): 437-439.
[10]	YU Yanfang, HU Yang, HE Shijie, XU Hongle, LEI Haixia, WANG Xiaoxiao, LI Huilong, ZHU Junde. Evaluation of control effects and crop safety of six herbicides and their combinations against weeds in direct-seeded rice fields [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(2): 430-436.
[11]	MAO Jisheng, ZHAO Loujun, ZHANG Xiao, YAO Zhangliang, LU Qiang, XU Weidong. Study on control effects of different compound herbicides against annual weeds in wheat fields [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(10): 2436-2439.
[12]	QI Zaihua, CHEN Hong, CAI Jianjun, PAN Wei, FENG Yifu, WANG Enguo. Study of the control effect of 80% monosultap soluble powder against borer pest by unmanned aerial vehicle in early rice [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(10): 2440-2443.
[13]	HUANG Qian. Control effects of different concentrations of two herbicides, single agent and compound agent on broad-leaved weeds in rapeseed field [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(1): 158-162.
[14]	LIU Pengfei, QIN Weiming, ZHANG Yizhi, WU Yuefu, WANG Hongli, QI He, LOU Binggan. Field efficacy trials of 22 fungicides against pear fire blight [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(9): 2152-2159.
[15]	FU Sheng, REN Jie, YANG Fengli. Effect of 9 herbicides on weed control effect and yield in single-cropping late rice direct seeding field [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(3): 657-660.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Comments

Abstract
Figures/Tables
References
Related Articles
Recommended Articles
Metrics
Comments

TOP