Several types of stem and leaf herbicides for the control effect of weeds in wheat fields in southern Zhejiang

doi:10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20240739

Abstract

Abstract:

To improve the effectiveness of weed control in wheat fields and to determine its safety and weed control effects, a comparative experiment on the effect of different stem and leaf herbicides treatments for controlling weeds in wheat fields was conducted during the 3-leaf and 1-heart stage of wheat (when the dominant weed species, Alopecurus aequalis, is at the 2-leaf and 1-heart stage). The results showed that the control effect of manual spray treatment was superior to that of aerial spray treatment. When 5% azolinoxin emulsified oil (2 250 mL·hm^-2) was applied in the wheat field where the absolute dominant weed population was Alopecurus aequalis, its plant control effect and fresh weight control effect against Alopecurus aequalis for 60 days was 100.00%, and the overall control effect against the weed population was over 90.00%. And the plant control effect and fresh weight control effect against the weed population of 107 g·L^-1 pinoxaden triple pre-mix emulsifiable concentrate(1 950 mL·hm^-2) or a combination of 5% pinoxaden emulsifiable concentrate(1 500 mL·hm^-2)+200 g·L^-1 fluroxypyr emulsifiable concentrate(900 mL·hm^-2) was over 95.00% weed control effect. In contrast, the application of fenoxaprop-P-ethyl provided low or negative effect against the Alopecurus aequalis population in the test field, and it is not recommended for application as a stem and leaf treatment herbicide in wheat fields dominated by Alopecurus aequalis.

Key words: southern Zhejiang, wheat field weeds, stem and leaf herbicides, control effect

CLC Number:

S451.2

FENG Yifu, NI Ming, WANG Zhizhou, CHEN Hong, FANG Hui. Several types of stem and leaf herbicides for the control effect of weeds in wheat fields in southern Zhejiang[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(9): 2230-2234.

Figures/Tables 2

References 11

[1]	阮赞誉, 沈秋兰, 居梦婷, 等. 几种茎叶处理除草剂对冬小麦田杂草的防效试验[J]. 上海农业科技, 2020(6): 155-156.
[2]	杜复生. 枣阳市麦田杂草优势种群动态及防除对策[J]. 湖北植保, 2000(6): 30-31.
[3]	项秉晗, 李迪, 潘苏峰, 等. 浙南稻麦连作区苗期麦田杂草种类及群落特征: 以黄岩区为例[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2023, 43(9): 34-42.
[4]	卢红, 张迪, 姜英, 等. 小麦田看麦娘对精噁唑禾草灵的抗药性水平[J]. 杂草学报, 2018, 36(3): 19-23.
[5]	夏秋霞. 江阴市麦田杂草发生现状与防除对策[J]. 上海农业科技, 2020(5): 144-145, 150.
[6]	朱阿秀, 张绍明, 鞠国钢, 等. 近年江苏省麦田杂草发生情况及防除对策[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2018, 38(7): 54-57.
[7]	武鹏, 于荣. 5%唑啉草酯乳油高效液相色谱分析方法研究[J]. 农药科学与管理, 2016, 37(4): 48-50.
[8]	谢英杰, 王国宾, 王宝聚, 等. 植保无人机喷施除草剂喷头选择及参数优化[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2021, 42(4): 61-69.
[9]	缪建锟, 杨皓, 闫晗, 等. 植保无人机喷施26%噻酮·异恶唑悬浮剂与38%莠去津悬浮剂混配剂防除春玉米田杂草效果[J]. 杂草学报, 2023, 41(2): 72-77.
[10]	王玛丽. 安徽省小麦田看麦娘抗药性及其抗性突变快速检测[D]. 合肥: 安徽农业大学, 2023.
[11]	俞航. 精噁唑禾草灵对菵草的毒物兴奋效应及相关种群治理[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2023.

处理	单子叶杂草				双子叶杂草				总体
处理	株数/ 株	株防治效果/%	地上部鲜重/g	鲜重防治效果/%	株数/ 株	株防治效果/%	地上部鲜重/g	鲜重防治效果/%	株数/ 株	株防治效果/%	地上部鲜重/g	鲜重防治效果/%
1	1.33 d	99.33 a	0.01 d	99.87 a	87.33 a	-58.79 e	2.17 a	-487.39 e	88.67 c	65.00 c	2.19 d	79.35 b
2	4.00 d	97.98 a	0.03 d	99.67 a	48.00 c	12.73 d	0.96 b	-159.46 d	52.00 d	79.47 b	0.99 d	90.62 ab
3	10.00 cd	94.96 ab	0.16 d	98.43 a	14.67 f	73.33 a	0.05 d	85.59 a	24.67 e	90.26 a	0.21 d	97.99 a
4	14.00 cd	92.94 ab	0.56 d	94.52 a	21.33 def	61.21 bc	0.09 d	76.58 ab	35.33 de	86.05 ab	0.65 d	93.89 a
5	24.00 c	87.90 b	0.38 d	96.28 a	16.00 ef	70.91 ab	0.05 d	87.39 a	40.00 de	84.21 ab	0.43 d	95.97 a
6	10.00 cd	94.96 ab	0.10 d	99.02 a	22.00 def	60.00 c	0.09 d	75.68 ab	32.00 e	87.37 a	0.19 d	98.21 a
7	246.00 a	-24.04 d	17.80 a	-74.17 c	24.67 d	55.15 c	0.12 cd	67.57 b	270.67 a	-6.84 e	17.92 a	-69.22 d
8	185.33 b	6.55 c	6.61 c	35.36 b	42.67 c	22.42 d	0.27 cd	27.93 c	228.00 b	10.00 d	6.87 c	35.10 c
9	195.33 b	1.51 c	16.82 a	-64.58 c	23.33 de	57.58 c	0.23 cd	38.74 c	218.67 b	13.68 d	17.05 a	-60.97 d
10	198.33 b	—	10.22 b	—	55.00 b	—	0.37 c	—	253.33 a	—	10.59 b	—

处理	单子叶杂草				双子叶杂草				总体
处理	株数/ 株	株防治效果/%	地上部鲜重/g	鲜重防治效果/%	株数/ 株	株防治效果/%	地上部鲜重/g	鲜重防治效果/%	株数/ 株	株防治效果/%	地上部鲜重/g	鲜重防治效果/%
1	1.33 d	99.33 a	0.01 d	99.87 a	87.33 a	-58.79 e	2.17 a	-487.39 e	88.67 c	65.00 c	2.19 d	79.35 b
2	4.00 d	97.98 a	0.03 d	99.67 a	48.00 c	12.73 d	0.96 b	-159.46 d	52.00 d	79.47 b	0.99 d	90.62 ab
3	10.00 cd	94.96 ab	0.16 d	98.43 a	14.67 f	73.33 a	0.05 d	85.59 a	24.67 e	90.26 a	0.21 d	97.99 a
4	14.00 cd	92.94 ab	0.56 d	94.52 a	21.33 def	61.21 bc	0.09 d	76.58 ab	35.33 de	86.05 ab	0.65 d	93.89 a
5	24.00 c	87.90 b	0.38 d	96.28 a	16.00 ef	70.91 ab	0.05 d	87.39 a	40.00 de	84.21 ab	0.43 d	95.97 a
6	10.00 cd	94.96 ab	0.10 d	99.02 a	22.00 def	60.00 c	0.09 d	75.68 ab	32.00 e	87.37 a	0.19 d	98.21 a
7	246.00 a	-24.04 d	17.80 a	-74.17 c	24.67 d	55.15 c	0.12 cd	67.57 b	270.67 a	-6.84 e	17.92 a	-69.22 d
8	185.33 b	6.55 c	6.61 c	35.36 b	42.67 c	22.42 d	0.27 cd	27.93 c	228.00 b	10.00 d	6.87 c	35.10 c
9	195.33 b	1.51 c	16.82 a	-64.58 c	23.33 de	57.58 c	0.23 cd	38.74 c	218.67 b	13.68 d	17.05 a	-60.97 d
10	198.33 b	—	10.22 b	—	55.00 b	—	0.37 c	—	253.33 a	—	10.59 b	—

处理	单子叶杂草				双子叶杂草				总体
处理	株数/ 株	株防治效果/%	地上部鲜重/g	鲜重防治效果/%	株数/ 株	株防治效果/%	地上部鲜重/g	鲜重防治效果/%	株数/ 株	株防治效果/%	地上部鲜重/g	鲜重防治效果/%
1	37.67 e	85.98 c	13.23 e	83.99 b	13.33 b	-207.93 c	1.70 b	-82.80 b	51.00 e	81.32 c	14.93 e	82.14 c
2	0 g	100.00 a	0 f	100.00 a	26.00 a	-500.46 d	5.50 a	-491.40 c	26.00 f	90.48 b	5.50 f	93.42 b
3	2.00 fg	99.26 ab	0.50 f	99.40 a	0 e	100.00 a	0 d	100.00 a	2.00 g	99.27 a	0.50 f	99.40 a
4	6.33 fg	97.64 ab	1.37 f	98.35 a	0 e	100.00 a	0 d	100.00 a	6.33 g	97.68 a	1.37 f	98.37 ab
5	12.33 f	95.41 b	3.83 f	95.36 a	0.33 e	92.30 ab	0.03 d	96.42 a	12.67 g	95.36 a	3.87 f	95.37 ab
6	4.33 fg	98.39 ab	2.13 f	97.42 a	0.67 de	84.60 ab	0.03 d	96.42 a	5.00 g	98.17 a	2.17 f	97.41 ab
7	227.33 c	15.39 e	76.40 c	7.58 d	0 e	100.00 a	0 d	100.00 a	227.33 c	16.73 e	76.40 c	8.61 e
8	77.00 d	71.34 d	35.87 d	56.61 c	1.67 d	61.51 b	0.27 d	71.33 a	78.67 d	71.18 d	36.13 d	56.78 d
9	296.33 a	-10.30 f	101.93 a	-23.30 e	0 e	100.00 a	0 d	100.00 a	296.33 a	-8.55 f	101.93 a	-21.93 f
10	268.67 b	—	82.67 b	—	4.33 c	—	0.93 c	—	273.00 b	—	83.60 b	—

处理	单子叶杂草				双子叶杂草				总体
处理	株数/ 株	株防治效果/%	地上部鲜重/g	鲜重防治效果/%	株数/ 株	株防治效果/%	地上部鲜重/g	鲜重防治效果/%	株数/ 株	株防治效果/%	地上部鲜重/g	鲜重防治效果/%
1	37.67 e	85.98 c	13.23 e	83.99 b	13.33 b	-207.93 c	1.70 b	-82.80 b	51.00 e	81.32 c	14.93 e	82.14 c
2	0 g	100.00 a	0 f	100.00 a	26.00 a	-500.46 d	5.50 a	-491.40 c	26.00 f	90.48 b	5.50 f	93.42 b
3	2.00 fg	99.26 ab	0.50 f	99.40 a	0 e	100.00 a	0 d	100.00 a	2.00 g	99.27 a	0.50 f	99.40 a
4	6.33 fg	97.64 ab	1.37 f	98.35 a	0 e	100.00 a	0 d	100.00 a	6.33 g	97.68 a	1.37 f	98.37 ab
5	12.33 f	95.41 b	3.83 f	95.36 a	0.33 e	92.30 ab	0.03 d	96.42 a	12.67 g	95.36 a	3.87 f	95.37 ab
6	4.33 fg	98.39 ab	2.13 f	97.42 a	0.67 de	84.60 ab	0.03 d	96.42 a	5.00 g	98.17 a	2.17 f	97.41 ab
7	227.33 c	15.39 e	76.40 c	7.58 d	0 e	100.00 a	0 d	100.00 a	227.33 c	16.73 e	76.40 c	8.61 e
8	77.00 d	71.34 d	35.87 d	56.61 c	1.67 d	61.51 b	0.27 d	71.33 a	78.67 d	71.18 d	36.13 d	56.78 d
9	296.33 a	-10.30 f	101.93 a	-23.30 e	0 e	100.00 a	0 d	100.00 a	296.33 a	-8.55 f	101.93 a	-21.93 f
10	268.67 b	—	82.67 b	—	4.33 c	—	0.93 c	—	273.00 b	—	83.60 b	—

[1]	ZHANG Xin, ZHANG Chunhua, WANG Cheng, CHEN Guoqi. Study on the application effect of flufenacet in rice fields [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(9): 2208-2212.
[2]	QIAN Cheng, CHEN Zengqian, LIU Xiaotong, WEI Haohua, ZHANG Juan, WANG Ke, YU Xianwen, HUANG Jun. Analysis of the effect of five kinds of chemical agents on the emergency control of Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(6): 1456-1459.
[3]	YING Jiali, WEN Shuangshuang, CAI Yunfei, YE Youju, QIAN Renjuan. Preliminary report on the cultivation and selection of fruit radish in Southern Zhejiang [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(5): 1114-1119.
[4]	YUAN Zhongqin, GU Guowei. Control effect of different fungicides on wheat scab and prospect for reducing dosage [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(5): 1216-1220.
[5]	LUO Qin, YAO Xiaoming, SHOU Menghui, ZHOU Yujie. Evaluation of different adjuvants on the control effect of rice diseases and insect pests by spraying drone [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(4): 986-991.
[6]	YU Yanfang, HU Yang, HE Shijie, XU Hongle, LEI Haixia, WANG Xiaoxiao, LI Huilong, ZHU Junde. Evaluation of control effects and crop safety of six herbicides and their combinations against weeds in direct-seeded rice fields [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(2): 430-436.
[7]	BAI Jianping, XU Weidong, LU Qiang, YAO Zhangliang. Field control effect of 40% prothioconazole·tebuconazole mixture on rice sheath blight [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(2): 437-439.
[8]	HUANG Qian. Control effects of different concentrations of two herbicides, single agent and compound agent on broad-leaved weeds in rapeseed field [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(1): 158-162.
[9]	LIU Pengfei, QIN Weiming, ZHANG Yizhi, WU Yuefu, WANG Hongli, QI He, LOU Binggan. Field efficacy trials of 22 fungicides against pear fire blight [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(9): 2152-2159.
[10]	SU Shiwen, FU Cunnian, SHI Jianlei, WANG Kelei, CHEN Xianzhi, ZAI Wenshan. Effects of different plant growth regulators on tomato plug seedling in southern Zhejiang [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(5): 1031-1036.
[11]	FU Sheng, REN Jie, YANG Fengli. Effect of 9 herbicides on weed control effect and yield in single-cropping late rice direct seeding field [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(3): 657-660.
[12]	YAN Manman, ZHENG Jianchao. Study on the prevention and control effect of 6% oligosaccharides·β chain protein on tomato yellow leaf curl virus disease under different planting periods and densities [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(12): 2964-2967.
[13]	LIU Yongan, DENG Lizhang, GAO Xiteng, HUANG Yechang, YUE Gaohong, PAN Binrong. Preliminary study on harvest time of green wheat kernel of different waxy wheat lines in Southern Zhejiang [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(11): 2547-2551.
[14]	MENG Pengxiang, ZHU Yan, WANG Xiaoxuan, SHANG Jintao. Control effect of technology combining seal and elimination for weeds in direct-sowing rice fields [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(11): 2665-2667.
[15]	CHEN Jianghua, DI Rui, XIAO Shan, CHAI Weigang, REN Shaopeng, CHEN Ruoxia. Study on the application techniques of controlling the first generation of Chilo suppressalis by releasing Trichogramma japonicum in early-season rice fields [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(11): 2676-2679.