Effects of feeding with Pomacea canaliculata on growth performance and carcass quality of Shaoxing ducks

doi:10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20250776

Abstract

Abstract:

The experiment aims to investigate the effects of Pomacea canaliculata on growth performance，carcass quality，and meat quality of Shaoxing ducks. 240 5-week-old Shaoxing ducks were selected and randomly divided into 2 groups，with 4 replicates in each group. The control group was fed with a corn-soybean meal basic diet，while the experimental group contained 3% chilled Pomacea canaliculata（crushed with shell，calculated as air-dried matter）. The energy and protein content of the two diets were the same. The results showed that compared with the control group，the final weight and total weight gain of Shaoxing ducks in the experimental group were significantly（p<0.05）increased by 4.4% and 11.3%，respectively，and the feed-to-weight ratio was significantly reduced by 10.0%. Compared with the control，the apparent digestibility of crude protein，crude fiber and calcium in the experimental group was increased by 3.64，4.17，and 2.57 percentage points，respectively. The eviscerated yield rate，leg muscle rate，chest muscle rate and abdominal fat rate of Shaoxing ducks in the experimental group were significantly increased by 2.8，0.4，1.1，and 0.8 percentage points，respectively. Meanwhile，the muscle redness value a^* and lightness value L^* were significantly higher than those in the control group. The experiment results showed that the addition of chilled Pomacea canaliculata to the feed could significantly improve the growth performance，feed absorption and utilization rate，carcass quality and meat color of Shaoxing ducks.

Key words: Pomacea canaliculata, Shaoxing duck, growth performance, carcass quality

CLC Number:

S834⁺.83

ZHANG Kun, YUAN Lu, ZHENG Fangyu, LI Jiayu, LIU Lu, GAN Lingfeng, SHAO Tingting, DING Linling, CHEN Yunlei, ZHONG Qunbin, ZHANG Lei. Effects of feeding with Pomacea canaliculata on growth performance and carcass quality of Shaoxing ducks[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(6): 1551-1555.

Figures/Tables 5

References 12

[1]	张平远. 用福寿螺粉代替鱼粉作水产饲料蛋白源［J］. 现代渔业信息，2007（11）：35.
	ZHANG P Y. Using Pomacea canaliculata powder instead of fish meal as protein source of aquatic feed［J］. Journal of Modern Fisheries Information，2007（11）：35.
[2]	罗渡，牟希东，宋红梅，等. 不同生境福寿螺（Pomacea canaliculata）的营养成分及其利用价值［J］. 生态学杂志，2012，31（8）：2004-2010.
	LUO D， MU X D， SONG H M，et al. Nutritional components and utilization values of golden apple snails（Pomacea canaliculata）in different habitats［J］. Chinese Journal of Ecology，2012，31（8）：2004-2010.
[3]	薛玲华，颜若彤，韩晓磊. 2种壳色福寿螺营养成分研究［J］. 水产养殖，2024，45（7）：20-25.
	XUE L H， YAN R T， HAN X L. Comparative analysis of the two-shell color Pomacea canaliculata nutrition［J］. Journal of Aquaculture，2024，45（7）：20-25.
[4]	刘军，谭济才，黄新，等. 稻田养鸭防控福寿螺的效果及对水稻产量的影响［J］. 湖南农业大学学报（自然科学版），2011，37（2）：185-188.
	LIU J， TAN J C， HUANG X，et al. Effect of controlling the golden apple snail and of heightening rice-output by breeding ducks in paddy field［J］. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University（Natural Sciences），2011，37（2）：185-188.
[5]	郑建平. 福寿螺的人工养殖技术及其干粉代替鱼粉饲喂肉鸡的对比试验［J］. 饲料工业，1996，17（3）：31-34.
	ZHENG J P. Artificial culture technology of Ampulla canaliculata and comparative experiment of feeding broilers with dry powder instead of fish meal［J］. Feed Industry，1996，17（3）：31-34.
[6]	徐智威，胡鉴轩，顾泽茂，等. 2个品种鸭稻田控草、除虫及捕食残余克氏原螯虾效率的比较［J］. 华中农业大学学报，2025，44（3）：104-111.
	XU Z W， HU J X， GU Z M，et al. Comparason on efficiency of two duck varieties in weed control，pest management，and predation on residual crayfish in rice fields［J］. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University，2025，44（3）：104-111.
[7]	叶胜强，龚萍，梁振华，等. 高温对稻-鸭共生模式下肉鸭行为学、生长性能及除草效果的影响［J］. 华中农业大学学报，2025，44（3）：156-163.
	YE S Q， GONG P， LIANG Z H，et al. Effects of high temperature on behavior，growth performance and weeding control efficacy of meat duck in rice-duck co-culture［J］. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University，2025，44（3）：156-163.
[8]	白涛，关宇红. 低鱼粉、无鱼粉与含鱼粉日粮对北京鸭饲喂效果的观察［J］. 黑龙江畜牧兽医，2003（7）：22.
	BAI T， GUAN Y H. Observation on addition of lower fish meal，non-fish meal and fish meal diet on feeding efficiency in Beijing duck［J］. Heilongjiang Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine，2003（7）：22.
[9]	周根来，杨晓志，殷洁鑫，等. 豌豆蛋白粉对1～4周龄高邮鸭生长性能、养分表观消化率、消化器官发育及血清生化指标的影响［J］. 动物营养学报，2017，29（10）：3648-3656.
	ZHOU G L， YANG X Z， YIN J X，et al. Effects of pea gluten meal on growth performance，nutrient apparent digestibility，digestive organs development and serum biochemical indexes of Gaoyou ducks aged from 1 to 4 weeks［J］. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition，2017，29（10）：3648-3656.
[10]	李梦婷，刘金苓，赵本良，等. 入侵动物福寿螺内生纤维素酶特性及应用研究进展［J］. 生态学杂志，2021，40（2）：559-567.
	LI M T， LIU J L， ZHAO B L，et al. Research progress on characteristics and applications of endogenous cellulase in apple snail［J］. Chinese Journal of Ecology，2021，40（2）：559-567.
[11]	徐琳，郑璐. 日粮添加发酵豆粕对肉鸭生长性能、屠宰性能及经济效益的影响［J］. 中国饲料，2023（24）：102-105.
	XU L， ZHENG L. Effects of fermented soybean meal on growth，slaughter performance and economic benefit of cherry valley ducks［J］. China Feed，2023（24）：102-105.
[12]	沈如勇，冯宇隆，韩雪，等. 低蛋白饲粮对28～63日龄三穗鸭生长性能和屠宰性能的影响［J］. 中国畜牧杂志，2024，60（9）：288-292.
	SHEN R Y， FENG Y L， HAN X，et al. Effects of low protein diet on growth performance and slaughter performance of 28 to 63-day-old Sansui duck［J］. Chinese Journal of Animal Science，2024，60（9）：288-292.

组分	含量
组分	对照组	试验组
玉米	64	66
豆粕	21	17
小麦麸	10	9
福寿螺	0	3
预混饲料	5	5
代谢能/（MJ·kg^-1）	11.40	11.20
粗蛋白	15.82	15.93
粗脂肪	4.18	4.04
粗纤维	3.55	3.47
钙	0.92	0.94
总磷	0.61	0.65
赖氨酸	0.95	0.97
蛋氨酸	0.32	0.32

组分	含量
组分	对照组	试验组
玉米	64	66
豆粕	21	17
小麦麸	10	9
福寿螺	0	3
预混饲料	5	5
代谢能/（MJ·kg^-1）	11.40	11.20
粗蛋白	15.82	15.93
粗脂肪	4.18	4.04
粗纤维	3.55	3.47
钙	0.92	0.94
总磷	0.61	0.65
赖氨酸	0.95	0.97
蛋氨酸	0.32	0.32

组别	初始体重/g	终体重/g	总增重/g	料重比
对照组	821±21	1 424±33	603±26	5.51±0.24
试验组	816±23	1 487±35^*	671±27^**	4.96±0.20^**

组别	初始体重/g	终体重/g	总增重/g	料重比
对照组	821±21	1 424±33	603±26	5.51±0.24
试验组	816±23	1 487±35^*	671±27^**	4.96±0.20^**

组别	干物质表观消化率	粗蛋白表观消化率	粗纤维表观消化率	粗脂肪表观消化率	钙表观消化率	总磷表观消化率
对照组	76.78±2.66	65.67±2.30	33.87±1.42	70.00±2.69	41.08±1.05	52.43±1.86
试验组	77.37±1.93	69.31±1.32^*	38.04±1.95^*	67.46±2.48	43.65±1.26^*	53.75±1.18