纳米碳叶面肥对大田烟草品质的影响

doi:10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20231108

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为明确纳米叶面肥在烟草生长中最佳喷施时期及其作用,在云南玉溪澄江烟区开展田间试验,研究了纳米碳叶面肥(NCF)在不同时期对烟草品质的影响,叶面喷施NCF对烟叶总氮含量有显著的提升效果,与CK相比,中、上部烟叶平均分别提升7.37%与14.45%。还原糖平均降低了17.41%;对烟碱含量有显著的降低效果,中、上部烟叶中烟碱含量平均分别降低了23.84%、33.87%。且NCF不同时期喷施均显著提高了中部烟叶钾含量,平均提高了12.50%。4个喷施时期处理间,其中T1处理(在团棵期、旺长期和打顶期进行3次喷施)对烟草品质提升最大。总之,叶面喷施NCF后,使烟草不同程度地提氮增钾、降烟碱。

关键词: 纳米碳, 叶面肥, 烟草品质

Abstract:

In order to determine the optimal application period of nano-foliar fertilizer in tobacco growth and its role, a field experiment was conducted in Chengjiang tobacco area of Yuxi, Yunnan Province to study the effects of nano-carbon foliar fertilizer (NCF) on tobacco quality at different periods. NCF spraying on leaves significantly increased the total nitrogen content of tobacco leaves. The average increase of middle and upper tobacco leaves was 7.37% and 14.45% respectively. Reducing sugar decreased by 17.41% on average. The nicotine content in middle and upper tobacco leaves decreased by 23.84% and 33.87% respectively. In addition, the potassium content of central tobacco leaves was significantly increased by 12.50% on average when NCF was applied in different periods. Among the four spraying periods, T1 treatment (spraying three times in the group growth period, flourishing period and peak period) had the greatest impact on the quality of tobacco. In conclusion, after spraying NCF on the leaf surface, the tobacco can improve nitrogen, increase potassium and reduce nicotine in different degrees.

Key words: nano-carbon, foliar fertilizer, tobacco quality

中图分类号:

S572

罗贞宝, 王文凯, 赵二卫, 翟绪, 于松, 陈丹, 张龙, 杨肖娥. 纳米碳叶面肥对大田烟草品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2025, 66(3): 609-614.

LUO Zhenbao, WANG Wenkai, ZHAO Erwei, ZHAI Xu, YU Song, CHEN Dan, ZHANG Long, Yang Xiaoe. Effect of the nano-carbon foliar fertilizer on tobacco quality in field[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(3): 609-614.

图/表 5

参考文献 26

[1]	李静, 张锡洲, 李廷轩, 等. 钾肥运筹对烤烟钾吸收利用的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015, 21(4): 969-978.
[2]	秦松, 刘大翠, 刘静, 等. 土壤肥力对烟叶化学成分及品质的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2007, 38(5): 901-905.
[3]	李燕婷, 李秀英, 肖艳, 等. 叶面肥的营养机理及应用研究进展[J]. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(1): 162-172.
[4]	贾望立, 张强. 叶面营养在烤烟生产上的应用研究进展[J]. 科技资讯, 2011(32): 80.
[5]	李晓越, 段淑辉, 周志成, 等. 不同叶面肥对烤烟Cd吸收及烟叶品质的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018, 24(5): 1330-1337.
[6]	董华芳, 罗茂萍, 陈雨峰, 等. 新型叶面肥对烤烟生长发育及产量质量的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2020, 59(12): 64-67.
[7]	李小龙, 孙占伟, 过伟民, 等. 纳米碳增效肥料对烟草农艺性状和经济指标的影响[J]. 土壤, 2016, 48(4): 831-834.
[8]	MAHDY A M, SHERIF F K, ELKHM2TIB E A, et al. Seed priming in nanoparticles of water treatment residual can increase the germination and growth of cucumber seedling under salinity stress[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 2020, 43(12): 1862-1874.
[9]	KHM2RDIA N, MEENA R H, JAT G, et al. Soil properties influenced by the foliar application of nano fertilizers in maize (Zea mays L.) crop[J]. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science, 2022: 99-111.
[10]	TIWARI D K, DASGUPTA-SCHUBERT N, VILLASEÑOR CENDEJAS L M, et al. Interfacing carbon nanotubes (CNT) with plants: enhancement of growth, water and ionic nutrient uptake in maize (Zea mays) and implications for nanoagriculture[J]. Applied Nanoscience, 2014, 4(5): 577-591.
[11]	KHODAKOVSKAYA M, DERVISHI E, MAHMOOD M, et al. Carbon nanotubes are able to penetrate plant seed coat and dramatically affect seed germination and plant growth[J]. ACS Nano, 2009, 3(10): 3221-3227.
[12]	WANG X P, HM2N H Y, LIU X Q, et al. Multi-walled carbon nanotubes can enhance root elongation of wheat (Triticum aestivum) plants[J]. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 2012, 14(6): 841.
[13]	LOWRY G V, AVELLAN A, GILBERTSON L M. Opportunities and challenges for nanotechnology in the agri-tech revolution[J]. Nature Nanotechnology, 2019, 14: 517-522.
[14]	AVELLAN A, YUN J, ZHM2NG Y L, et al. Nanoparticle size and coating chemistry control foliar uptake pathways, translocation, and leaf-to-rhizosphere transport in wheat[J]. ACS Nano, 2019, 13(5): 5291-5305.
[15]	MASTRONARDI E, MONREAL C, DEROSA M C. Personalized medicine for crops? opportunities for the application of molecular recognition in agriculture[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2018, 66(26): 6457-6461.
[16]	ZAHRA Z, HM2BIB Z, HYUN H, et al. Overview on recent developments in the design, application, and impacts of nano fertilizers in agriculture[J]. Sustainability, 2022, 14(15): 9397.
[17]	国家烟草专卖局.烟草及烟草制品水溶性糖的测定连续流动法: YC/T 159—2002[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2004.
[18]	国家烟草专卖局.烟草及烟草制品总植物碱的测定连续流动(硫氰酸钾)法: YC/T 468—2021[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2022.
[19]	国家烟草专卖局.烟草及烟草制品总氮的测定连续流动法: YC/T 161—2002[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2004.
[20]	国家烟草专卖局.烟草及烟草制品氯的测定连续流动法: YC/T 162—2011[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2011.
[21]	国家烟草专卖局.烟草及烟草制品钾的测定连续流动法: YC/T 217—2007[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2007.
[22]	陈瑞泰. 中国烟草栽培学[M]. 上海: 科学技术出版社, 2005:10-14.
[23]	杨玉玲, 卢晓延, 周先国, 等. 喷施含腐植酸与微量元素的叶面肥对烤烟产质量的效应[J]. 西南农业学报, 2013, 26(5): 1966-1970.
[24]	邢少峰, 刘海轮, 和文祥, 等. 培肥对烟田土壤化学性质及烟草品质的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2010, 19(1): 126-130.
[25]	殷宪国, 董晓文. 复合叶面营养液开发现状与研制[J]. 湖北化工, 1991 (1): 42-44.
[26]	李雪飞, 胡静静, 王庆菊, 等. 微量元素喷施对紫叶桃叶片花色苷含量及其合成酶活性的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2010, 46(12): 75-79.

处理	总氮含量/%	烟碱含量/%	总糖含量/%	还原糖含量/%
CK	2.51±0.06 c	1.72±0.17 a	20.81±0.56 a	15.20±0.68 a
T1	2.69±0.08 b	1.20±0.04 b	15.55±0.63 c	10.57±0.57 d
T2	2.68±0.04 b	1.31±0.18 b	18.63±1.81 b	12.20±0.65 c
T3	2.78±0.10 a	1.36±0.20 b	17.54±0.35 b	13.12±0.95 b
T4	2.63±0.04 b	1.36±0.22 b	15.96±0.54 c	12.94±0.39 b
处理	钾含量/%	氯含量/%	氮碱比	糖碱比
CK	1.44±0.12 b	0.22±0.04 a	1.47±0.17 b	12.03±1.34 a
T1	1.77±0.34 a	0.17±0.01 b	2.26±0.09 a	13.04±0.54 a
T2	1.82±0.03 a	0.23±0.07 a	2.07±0.29 a	14.60±3.53 a
T3	1.45±0.36 b	0.26±0.01 a	2.09±0.33 a	13.21±2.11 a
T4	1.44±0.06 b	0.24±0.06 a	1.98±0.34 a	12.01±1.88 a

处理	总氮含量/%	烟碱含量/%	总糖含量/%	还原糖含量/%
CK	2.51±0.06 c	1.72±0.17 a	20.81±0.56 a	15.20±0.68 a
T1	2.69±0.08 b	1.20±0.04 b	15.55±0.63 c	10.57±0.57 d
T2	2.68±0.04 b	1.31±0.18 b	18.63±1.81 b	12.20±0.65 c
T3	2.78±0.10 a	1.36±0.20 b	17.54±0.35 b	13.12±0.95 b
T4	2.63±0.04 b	1.36±0.22 b	15.96±0.54 c	12.94±0.39 b
处理	钾含量/%	氯含量/%	氮碱比	糖碱比
CK	1.44±0.12 b	0.22±0.04 a	1.47±0.17 b	12.03±1.34 a
T1	1.77±0.34 a	0.17±0.01 b	2.26±0.09 a	13.04±0.54 a
T2	1.82±0.03 a	0.23±0.07 a	2.07±0.29 a	14.60±3.53 a
T3	1.45±0.36 b	0.26±0.01 a	2.09±0.33 a	13.21±2.11 a
T4	1.44±0.06 b	0.24±0.06 a	1.98±0.34 a	12.01±1.88 a

处理	总氮含量/%	烟碱含量/%	总糖含量/%	还原糖含量/%
CK	2.63±0.04 c	1.86±0.01 a	20.34±0.14 a	13.94±0.09 a
T1	2.98±0.01 b	1.31±0.03 b	16.91±0.30 b	11.29±0.12 b
T2	3.17±0.04 a	1.26±0.03 b	14.78±2.28 b	10.09±1.30 c
T3	3.19±0.06 a	1.12±0.01 c	16.01±0.38 b	11.90±0.34 b
T4	2.70±0.01 c	1.23±0.08 b	16.77±0.31 b	12.77±0.45 a
处理	钾含量/%	氯含量/%	氮碱比	糖碱比
CK	1.13±0.03 b	0.21±0.01 a	1.42±0.03 d	10.97±0.07 b
T1	1.29±0.02 a	0.11±0.01 b	2.28±0.05 c	12.92±0.21 a
T2	1.11±0.04 b	0.24±0.06 a	2.52±0.04 b	11.79±2.11 a
T3	1.24±0.02 a	0.24±0.01 a	2.84±0.03 a	14.23±0.43 a
T4	1.29±0.03 a	0.14±0.01 b	2.19±0.14 c	13.65±1.12 a

处理	总氮含量/%	烟碱含量/%	总糖含量/%	还原糖含量/%
CK	2.63±0.04 c	1.86±0.01 a	20.34±0.14 a	13.94±0.09 a
T1	2.98±0.01 b	1.31±0.03 b	16.91±0.30 b	11.29±0.12 b
T2	3.17±0.04 a	1.26±0.03 b	14.78±2.28 b	10.09±1.30 c
T3	3.19±0.06 a	1.12±0.01 c	16.01±0.38 b	11.90±0.34 b
T4	2.70±0.01 c	1.23±0.08 b	16.77±0.31 b	12.77±0.45 a
处理	钾含量/%	氯含量/%	氮碱比	糖碱比
CK	1.13±0.03 b	0.21±0.01 a	1.42±0.03 d	10.97±0.07 b
T1	1.29±0.02 a	0.11±0.01 b	2.28±0.05 c	12.92±0.21 a
T2	1.11±0.04 b	0.24±0.06 a	2.52±0.04 b	11.79±2.11 a
T3	1.24±0.02 a	0.24±0.01 a	2.84±0.03 a	14.23±0.43 a
T4	1.29±0.03 a	0.14±0.01 b	2.19±0.14 c	13.65±1.12 a