Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2025, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (1): 51-56.DOI: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20231102
Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHU Changan1(), HAO Quanyou2, LI Qianrong3, LI Zhaofeng4,*(
)
Received:
2023-11-12
Online:
2025-01-11
Published:
2025-01-14
CLC Number:
ZHU Changan, HAO Quanyou, LI Qianrong, LI Zhaofeng. Study on the components of plant height in spring wheat in Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(1): 51-56.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnykx.cn/EN/10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20231102
性状 | 地点 | 最小值 | 最大值 | 平均值 | 标准差 | 变异系数/% | 广义遗传力/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高/cm | 石河子 | 68.55 | 89.90 | 81.28 Cc | 4.83 | 5.95 | 68.95 |
永宁 | 80.00 | 111.70 | 99.90 Aa | 7.56 | 7.57 | ||
元谋 | 75.70 | 112.24 | 91.64 Bb | 6.78 | 7.40 | ||
穗长/cm | 石河子 | 7.35 | 11.60 | 8.76 Bb | 0.72 | 8.25 | 74.80 |
永宁 | 8.50 | 13.33 | 10.27 Aa | 0.91 | 8.86 | ||
元谋 | 8.49 | 13.25 | 10.38 Aa | 1.14 | 10.99 | ||
L1/cm | 石河子 | 21.30 | 38.55 | 32.02 Cc | 3.46 | 10.82 | 76.84 |
永宁 | 29.27 | 44.90 | 37.87 Bb | 3.49 | 9.23 | ||
元谋 | 27.47 | 44.91 | 38.73 Aa | 3.75 | 9.67 | ||
L2/cm | 石河子 | 14.90 | 22.65 | 18.69 Bb | 1.76 | 9.40 | 74.99 |
永宁 | 16.33 | 33.50 | 23.14 Aa | 3.02 | 13.07 | ||
元谋 | 12.33 | 22.41 | 18.08 Cc | 1.80 | 9.96 | ||
L3/cm | 石河子 | 9.20 | 14.11 | 11.31 Cc | 1.01 | 8.94 | 63.26 |
永宁 | 10.47 | 19.00 | 14.80 Aa | 1.74 | 11.76 | ||
元谋 | 9.97 | 15.51 | 11.99 Bb | 1.53 | 12.74 | ||
L4/cm | 石河子 | 5.45 | 8.85 | 7.17 Cc | 0.79 | 11.00 | 65.13 |
永宁 | 6.83 | 11.83 | 9.17 Aa | 1.13 | 12.36 | ||
元谋 | 5.45 | 11.69 | 8.09 Bb | 1.40 | 17.30 | ||
L5/cm | 石河子 | 1.50 | 5.66 | 3.22 Cc | 0.91 | 28.34 | 40.59 |
永宁 | 2.50 | 6.70 | 4.88 Aa | 1.01 | 20.73 | ||
元谋 | 2.27 | 9.54 | 4.37 Bb | 1.72 | 39.44 | ||
IL | 石河子 | 0.55 | 0.67 | 0.62 Aa | 0.03 | 4.66 | 53.29 |
永宁 | 0.57 | 0.67 | 0.61 Bb | 0.03 | 4.24 | ||
元谋 | 0.55 | 0.67 | 0.62 Aa | 0.03 | 4.58 | ||
I1 | 石河子 | 0.55 | 0.70 | 0.63 Bb | 0.03 | 4.91 | 79.47 |
永宁 | 0.54 | 0.68 | 0.62 Cc | 0.03 | 4.77 | ||
元谋 | 0.61 | 0.76 | 0.68 Aa | 0.03 | 4.47 | ||
I2 | 石河子 | 0.58 | 0.68 | 0.62 Bb | 0.02 | 3.58 | 66.00 |
永宁 | 0.55 | 0.69 | 0.61 Bc | 0.03 | 5.63 | ||
元谋 | 0.53 | 0.67 | 0.68 Aa | 0.03 | 4.47 | ||
I3 | 石河子 | 0.56 | 0.65 | 0.61 Bb | 0.02 | 3.87 | 61.39 |
永宁 | 0.55 | 0.67 | 0.62 Aa | 0.02 | 3.90 | ||
元谋 | 0.51 | 0.66 | 0.60 Bb | 0.03 | 5.59 | ||
I4 | 石河子 | 0.59 | 0.80 | 0.70 Aa | 0.02 | 3.87 | 46.70 |
永宁 | 0.59 | 0.77 | 0.66 Bb | 0.04 | 6.22 | ||
元谋 | 0.53 | 0.75 | 0.66 Bb | 0.06 | 8.57 |
Table 1 Descriptive statistical analysis of plant height components in different test sites
性状 | 地点 | 最小值 | 最大值 | 平均值 | 标准差 | 变异系数/% | 广义遗传力/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高/cm | 石河子 | 68.55 | 89.90 | 81.28 Cc | 4.83 | 5.95 | 68.95 |
永宁 | 80.00 | 111.70 | 99.90 Aa | 7.56 | 7.57 | ||
元谋 | 75.70 | 112.24 | 91.64 Bb | 6.78 | 7.40 | ||
穗长/cm | 石河子 | 7.35 | 11.60 | 8.76 Bb | 0.72 | 8.25 | 74.80 |
永宁 | 8.50 | 13.33 | 10.27 Aa | 0.91 | 8.86 | ||
元谋 | 8.49 | 13.25 | 10.38 Aa | 1.14 | 10.99 | ||
L1/cm | 石河子 | 21.30 | 38.55 | 32.02 Cc | 3.46 | 10.82 | 76.84 |
永宁 | 29.27 | 44.90 | 37.87 Bb | 3.49 | 9.23 | ||
元谋 | 27.47 | 44.91 | 38.73 Aa | 3.75 | 9.67 | ||
L2/cm | 石河子 | 14.90 | 22.65 | 18.69 Bb | 1.76 | 9.40 | 74.99 |
永宁 | 16.33 | 33.50 | 23.14 Aa | 3.02 | 13.07 | ||
元谋 | 12.33 | 22.41 | 18.08 Cc | 1.80 | 9.96 | ||
L3/cm | 石河子 | 9.20 | 14.11 | 11.31 Cc | 1.01 | 8.94 | 63.26 |
永宁 | 10.47 | 19.00 | 14.80 Aa | 1.74 | 11.76 | ||
元谋 | 9.97 | 15.51 | 11.99 Bb | 1.53 | 12.74 | ||
L4/cm | 石河子 | 5.45 | 8.85 | 7.17 Cc | 0.79 | 11.00 | 65.13 |
永宁 | 6.83 | 11.83 | 9.17 Aa | 1.13 | 12.36 | ||
元谋 | 5.45 | 11.69 | 8.09 Bb | 1.40 | 17.30 | ||
L5/cm | 石河子 | 1.50 | 5.66 | 3.22 Cc | 0.91 | 28.34 | 40.59 |
永宁 | 2.50 | 6.70 | 4.88 Aa | 1.01 | 20.73 | ||
元谋 | 2.27 | 9.54 | 4.37 Bb | 1.72 | 39.44 | ||
IL | 石河子 | 0.55 | 0.67 | 0.62 Aa | 0.03 | 4.66 | 53.29 |
永宁 | 0.57 | 0.67 | 0.61 Bb | 0.03 | 4.24 | ||
元谋 | 0.55 | 0.67 | 0.62 Aa | 0.03 | 4.58 | ||
I1 | 石河子 | 0.55 | 0.70 | 0.63 Bb | 0.03 | 4.91 | 79.47 |
永宁 | 0.54 | 0.68 | 0.62 Cc | 0.03 | 4.77 | ||
元谋 | 0.61 | 0.76 | 0.68 Aa | 0.03 | 4.47 | ||
I2 | 石河子 | 0.58 | 0.68 | 0.62 Bb | 0.02 | 3.58 | 66.00 |
永宁 | 0.55 | 0.69 | 0.61 Bc | 0.03 | 5.63 | ||
元谋 | 0.53 | 0.67 | 0.68 Aa | 0.03 | 4.47 | ||
I3 | 石河子 | 0.56 | 0.65 | 0.61 Bb | 0.02 | 3.87 | 61.39 |
永宁 | 0.55 | 0.67 | 0.62 Aa | 0.02 | 3.90 | ||
元谋 | 0.51 | 0.66 | 0.60 Bb | 0.03 | 5.59 | ||
I4 | 石河子 | 0.59 | 0.80 | 0.70 Aa | 0.02 | 3.87 | 46.70 |
永宁 | 0.59 | 0.77 | 0.66 Bb | 0.04 | 6.22 | ||
元谋 | 0.53 | 0.75 | 0.66 Bb | 0.06 | 8.57 |
性状 | 石河子与永宁 | 石河子与元谋 | 永宁与元谋 |
---|---|---|---|
株高 | 0.457** | 0.458** | 0.440** |
穗长 | 0.518** | 0.713** | 0.351* |
L1 | 0.468** | 0.646** | 0.457** |
L2 | 0.522** | 0.463** | 0.649** |
L3 | 0.368* | 0.229 | 0.501** |
L4 | 0.503** | 0.411** | 0.366* |
L5 | 0.334* | 0.364* | 0.008 |
IL | 0.260 | 0.398* | 0.124 |
I1 | 0.506** | 0.515** | 0.268** |
I2 | 0.485** | 0.219 | 0.407* |
I3 | 0.513** | 0.207 | 0.395* |
I4 | 0.209 | 0.353* | 0.043 |
Table 2 Correlation coefficient of different traits among different test sites
性状 | 石河子与永宁 | 石河子与元谋 | 永宁与元谋 |
---|---|---|---|
株高 | 0.457** | 0.458** | 0.440** |
穗长 | 0.518** | 0.713** | 0.351* |
L1 | 0.468** | 0.646** | 0.457** |
L2 | 0.522** | 0.463** | 0.649** |
L3 | 0.368* | 0.229 | 0.501** |
L4 | 0.503** | 0.411** | 0.366* |
L5 | 0.334* | 0.364* | 0.008 |
IL | 0.260 | 0.398* | 0.124 |
I1 | 0.506** | 0.515** | 0.268** |
I2 | 0.485** | 0.219 | 0.407* |
I3 | 0.513** | 0.207 | 0.395* |
I4 | 0.209 | 0.353* | 0.043 |
性状 | 穗长 | 小穗数 | 穗粒数 | 千粒重 | 穗粒重 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
石河子 | 永宁 | 元谋 | 石河子 | 永宁 | 元谋 | 石河子 | 永宁 | 元谋 | 石河子 | 永宁 | 元谋 | 石河子 | 永宁 | 元谋 | |
L1 | 0.329** | 0.427** | 0.329* | 0.098 | -0.098 | 0.304 | 0.247 | 0.016 | 0.172 | 0.266 | -0.021 | 0.269 | 0.408** | 0.057 | 0.029 |
L2 | 0.065 | -0.061 | 0.073 | -0.081 | -0.346* | 0.049 | 0.164 | -0.368* | -0.295 | 0.012 | 0.148 | 0.230 | 0.193 | -0.224 | -0.135 |
L3 | 0.005 | -0.017 | -0.032 | 0.277 | -0.017 | 0.188 | 0.340* | -0.153 | -0.218 | -0.156 | 0.238 | -0.023 | 0.236 | 0.006 | -0.202 |
L4 | 0.054 | -0.124 | 0.144 | 0.362* | -0.154 | -0.127 | 0.283 | -0.154 | -0.127 | -0.133 | 0.485** | 0.040 | 0.184 | 0.193 | 0.155 |
L5 | 0.142 | 0.137 | 0.219 | 0.383* | 0.114 | 0.051 | 0.281 | 0.010 | 0.005 | -0.002 | 0.288 | -0.050 | 0.271 | 0.231 | 0.223 |
IL | -0.449** | 0.004 | -0.185 | -0.508** | -0.304 | -0.022 | -0.365* | -0.159 | 0.042 | 0.317* | -0.269 | 0.243 | 0.153 | -0.308 | -0.151 |
I1 | -0.047 | 0.373* | 0.159 | 0.136 | 0.299 | 0.190 | 0.063 | 0.436** | 0.333** | 0.180 | -0.164 | 0.023 | 0.009 | 0.270 | 0.115 |
I2 | -0.129 | -0.024 | 0.087 | -0.396* | -0.287 | -0.147 | -0.274 | -0.191 | -0.041 | 0.145 | -0.077 | 0.177 | 0.076 | -0.191 | 0.064 |
I3 | -0.163 | 0.152 | -0.212 | -0.225 | 0.069 | 0.123 | -0.076 | 0.017 | -0.033 | -0.067 | -0.259 | -0.051 | 0.112 | -0.196 | -0.329** |
I4 | -0.207 | -0.280 | -0.223 | -0.291 | -0.123 | -0.107 | -0.240 | -0.077 | -0.020 | 0.141 | -0.023 | 0.174 | 0.125 | -0.113 | -0.150 |
Table 3 Correlation coefficient between plant height components and yield traits
性状 | 穗长 | 小穗数 | 穗粒数 | 千粒重 | 穗粒重 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
石河子 | 永宁 | 元谋 | 石河子 | 永宁 | 元谋 | 石河子 | 永宁 | 元谋 | 石河子 | 永宁 | 元谋 | 石河子 | 永宁 | 元谋 | |
L1 | 0.329** | 0.427** | 0.329* | 0.098 | -0.098 | 0.304 | 0.247 | 0.016 | 0.172 | 0.266 | -0.021 | 0.269 | 0.408** | 0.057 | 0.029 |
L2 | 0.065 | -0.061 | 0.073 | -0.081 | -0.346* | 0.049 | 0.164 | -0.368* | -0.295 | 0.012 | 0.148 | 0.230 | 0.193 | -0.224 | -0.135 |
L3 | 0.005 | -0.017 | -0.032 | 0.277 | -0.017 | 0.188 | 0.340* | -0.153 | -0.218 | -0.156 | 0.238 | -0.023 | 0.236 | 0.006 | -0.202 |
L4 | 0.054 | -0.124 | 0.144 | 0.362* | -0.154 | -0.127 | 0.283 | -0.154 | -0.127 | -0.133 | 0.485** | 0.040 | 0.184 | 0.193 | 0.155 |
L5 | 0.142 | 0.137 | 0.219 | 0.383* | 0.114 | 0.051 | 0.281 | 0.010 | 0.005 | -0.002 | 0.288 | -0.050 | 0.271 | 0.231 | 0.223 |
IL | -0.449** | 0.004 | -0.185 | -0.508** | -0.304 | -0.022 | -0.365* | -0.159 | 0.042 | 0.317* | -0.269 | 0.243 | 0.153 | -0.308 | -0.151 |
I1 | -0.047 | 0.373* | 0.159 | 0.136 | 0.299 | 0.190 | 0.063 | 0.436** | 0.333** | 0.180 | -0.164 | 0.023 | 0.009 | 0.270 | 0.115 |
I2 | -0.129 | -0.024 | 0.087 | -0.396* | -0.287 | -0.147 | -0.274 | -0.191 | -0.041 | 0.145 | -0.077 | 0.177 | 0.076 | -0.191 | 0.064 |
I3 | -0.163 | 0.152 | -0.212 | -0.225 | 0.069 | 0.123 | -0.076 | 0.017 | -0.033 | -0.067 | -0.259 | -0.051 | 0.112 | -0.196 | -0.329** |
I4 | -0.207 | -0.280 | -0.223 | -0.291 | -0.123 | -0.107 | -0.240 | -0.077 | -0.020 | 0.141 | -0.023 | 0.174 | 0.125 | -0.113 | -0.150 |
[1] | FAN M S, SHEN J B, YUAN L X, et al. Improving crop productivity and resource use efficiency to ensure food security and environmental quality in China[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2012, 63(1): 13-24. |
[2] | WAN J M. Genetic crop improvement: a guarantee for sustainable agricultural production[J]. Engineering, 2018, 4(4): 431-432. |
[3] | 付美玉, 熊宏春, 周春云, 等. 小麦矮秆突变体je0098的遗传分析与其矮秆基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 580-589. |
[4] | 李姗, 黄允智, 刘学英, 等. 作物氮肥利用效率遗传改良研究进展[J]. 遗传, 2021, 43(7): 629-640. |
[5] | 姜朋, 何漪, 张旭, 等. 宁麦9号与扬麦158株高及其构成因素的遗传解析[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(6): 858-868. |
[6] | 朱新开, 郭文善, 李春燕, 等. 小麦株高及其构成指数与产量及品质的相关性[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2009, 29(6): 1034-1038. |
[7] | 龚胤书, 魏淑红, 彭正松, 等. 硬粒小麦ANW16F株高及构成因子与部分产量性状遗传研究[J]. 西南农业学报, 2021, 34(2): 229-235. |
[8] | 毕晓静, 史秀秀, 马守才, 等. 小麦农艺性状的主基因+多基因遗传分析[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2013, 33(4): 630-634. |
[9] | 温明星, 李东升, 胡芳芳, 等. 宁麦9号×镇麦168小麦F2群体产量相关性状的遗传模型分析[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2018, 38(4): 386-394. |
[10] | 余马, 张洪, 左文松, 等. 小麦株高及其构成因子QTL定位研究[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2017, 35(4): 465-475. |
[11] | 梁永波, 李浩然, 张志慧, 等. 黄淮北部不同小麦品种(系)株型性状与产量关系研究[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2022, 42(5): 546-555. |
[12] | 赵红梅, 杨艳君, 李洪燕, 等. 不同保墒耕作与播种方式对旱地小麦农艺性状及产量的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2016, 35(5): 74-78. |
[13] | 马艳明, 冯智宇, 王威, 等. 新疆冬小麦品种农艺及产量性状遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(12): 1997-2007. |
[14] | 杨朋娟, 张世文, 王振山, 等. 多环境评估谷子资源主要农艺性状遗传参数[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2022, 23(4): 1046-1054. |
[15] | 刘兆晔, 于经川, 牟春生, 等. 小麦株高构成指数的研究[J]. 莱阳农学院学报, 2000, 17(2): 120-123. |
[16] | 李召锋, 艾尼瓦尔, 仲家楷, 等. 异地种植春小麦主要农艺性状变化规律研究[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2014, 51(7): 1184-1189. |
[17] | 李振玺, 张万宝. 宁夏引黄灌区渠道砌护对地下水位的影响[J]. 人民黄河, 2010, 32(11): 81-83. |
[18] | 丁启振, 周金龙, 杜明亮, 等. 新疆石河子-昌吉地区2016—2020年地下水位动态特征分析[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2022, 41(2): 109-117. |
[19] | 雷振生, 林作楫. 黄淮麦区冬小麦合理株型结构研究[J]. 华北农学报, 1994, 9(4): 27-32. |
[20] | 崔淑佳, 潘晓萍, 高居荣, 等. 不同小麦品种(系)株高及节间长度研究[J]. 山东农业科学, 2014, 46(10): 19-22. |
[21] | 赵万春, 王红. 小麦株高及其构成因素的遗传和相关性研究[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2003, 23(4): 28-31. |
[22] | 姚金保, 任丽娟, 张平平, 等. 小麦株高及节间长度的杂种优势和遗传分析[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2011, 27(4): 717-722. |
[23] | 欧俊梅, 王治斌, 李生荣, 等. 矮秆糯小麦株高及各节间长度与产量性状遗传研究[J]. 华北农学报, 2014, 29(S1): 213-217. |
[24] | 李召锋, 黄润, 刘晓欢, 等. 新疆春小麦资源茎秆形态特征与抗倒性的关系[J]. 西南农业学报, 2017, 30(4): 717-721. |
[25] | 李前荣, 张东海, 崔凤娟, 等. 宁夏引黄灌区春小麦抗倒性研究[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2022, 42(12): 1457-1463. |
[1] | SU Hang, ZHOU Guoyan, SONG Xiaofei, LI Xiaoli, YAN Liying, XIE Yang. Effect of fertilizer reduction combined with organic water-soluble fertilizer on quality and yield of greenhouse cucumber [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(1): 106-110. |
[2] | HUANG Hongming, WU Meijuan, WANG Nuan, CAO Chunxin, FU Xujun, WU Zaogui. Effects of fertilization on the yield and benefit of fresh autumn soybean [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(1): 111-114. |
[3] | LAN Haiyan, QIU Zhongcan, DING Fei, QI Xingjiang, QIU Dongliang, ZHENG Xiliang, LIANG Senmiao, ZHANG Shuwen. Effect of greenhouse facilities on the flowering and fruit quality of Myrica rubra [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(1): 115-119. |
[4] | XU Min, ZHANG Fujian, SONG Jiawei, GU Jingyu, SHENG Haian, LEI Lifeng, YAO Wenwu, LU Yan, GONG Kai, JIANG Huiping. Cultivation and screening of new cultivars of Ranunculus asiaticus L. in Venlo greenhouse [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(1): 127-132. |
[5] | LI Ronghui, WANG Danying, CHU Guang. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer management on yield, nitrogen use efficiency and grain quality of high-quality hybrid rice variety Huazheyou 210 [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(1): 20-24. |
[6] | JIANG Shenyue, XUE Zhaokun, JIANG Huaqin, MENG Qingjiu, SHAO Sainan, DIAO Zhihan, YU Keru, YE Zhengqian, JIANG Yugen. Discussion on the rapid fertilization technology for the restoration of non-grain cultivated land [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(1): 218-223. |
[7] | XIA Qiongmei, YAN Sandan, ZHUO Xiaofang, LONG Ruiping, ZHU Haiping, LI Guiyong, YANG Jiu, YANG Congdang. Analysis of the difference in indica rice yield at different altitudes in Yunnan [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(1): 25-29. |
[8] | FANG Wenying, CHEN Jiaqi, CHU Daiwei, DING Mengjia, YAO Ping, JIN Yimin, LUO Tianzi, SHEN Xinglian, MO Honghua, HUANG Yuying, ZHENG Xiaoxiao, ZHU Defeng. Effects of high temperature during the period of heading and flowering on setting rate and yield of hybrid rice [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(1): 30-34. |
[9] | ZHANG Xufeng, JIANG Yufei, WANG Luyou, XIANG Tianyong, HE Weiqiang, LUO Lujia. Effects of combined application of biogas slurry and chemical fertilizer on soil quality and rice yield in tillage layer [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(1): 35-39. |
[10] | JI Li, LI Chuanzhe, DONG Qingjun, ZHONG Ping, SUN Chunmei, SHAO Wenqi, CHEN Chuan. Effect of seed dressing with chemicals on the growth and yield of dryland wheat along the Huaihe River Area [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(1): 40-43. |
[11] | YAN Jiaqi, HONG Leidong, FANG Yuxian, WANG Meiyun, HONG Chunlai, YAO Yanlai. Effects of replacing chemical fertilizers with organic fertilizers on soil properties, yield and quality of Ipomoea batatas [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(1): 57-61. |
[12] | ZHANG Kunchang, LI Yongquan, LYU Yuzhou, WANG Chuan, WU Jinyi, WU Hongfei, CEN Yingyuan, LIAO Boyong, TU Panfeng. Effect of different proportion of foliar fertilizer on the growth and fruit setting of Camellia oleifera [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(1): 62-71. |
[13] | ZHOU Weiyu, KONG Guanghui, ZHANG Guanghai, ZHAO Gaokun, WU Yuping, LI Wei, LI Yongping, YAO Heng, WANG Na. Effects of different peanut organic fertilizers on the yield, quality, and soil physicochemical properties of Yunxue 38 [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(1): 72-78. |
[14] | LIU Jianjun, CAO Anquan, PENG Jiuhua, WANG Lixiang, CHEN Heqing, YANG Zaijun, ZHANG Fengshou, XUE Gang. Effects of microbial agents on soil microorganisms and yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(1): 79-85. |
[15] | XU Yueming, XIN Haibin, HU Qiuqian, LIU Ping. Analysis on agronomic traits and yield of soybean and maize under strip compound planting with chemical control agents [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(1): 86-91. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||