Study of the effect of biochar on alleviating the continuous cropping obstacle of Curcuma wenyujin Y.H. Chen & C. Ling

doi:10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20240339

Abstract

Abstract:

This study compared the yield and plant phenotype of Curcuma wenyujin Y.H.Chen & C.Ling in continuous cropping soils treated with different application amounts of biochar, and found that the application of biochar can promote the yield and plant growth of Curcuma wenyujin Y.H.Chen & C.Ling. By testing the content of volatile oil and nutrient elements in different parts of Curcuma wenyujin Y.H.Chen & C.Ling, it was found that the content of volatile oil and nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium nutrient element contents of Curcuma wenyujin Y.H.Chen & C.Ling. were significantly increased by the application of biochar, and that the effect of the promotion was best when biochar was applied at 300 kg per 667 m². In this study, the activities of catalase, urease and sucrase in soil were tested, and the results showed that the application of biochar could improve the enzyme activities in soil. It can be inferred that the application of biochar improves soil physicochemical properties, promotes the absorption of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium and the growth of Curcuma wenyujin Y.H.Chen & C.Ling. This study provides an effective way and theoretical basis for alleviating the continuous cropping obstacles of Curcuma wenyujin Y.H.Chen & C.Ling.

Key words: Curcuma wenyujin Y.H.Chen &, C.Ling, biochar, continuous cropping obstacle, soil enzyme activity

CLC Number:

S567

GU Xueping, ZHANG Yiqun, LI Yaping, SUN Jian, DUAN Xiaojing, LIU Yingying, TAO Zhengming, JIANG Wu, CHEN Jiadong. Study of the effect of biochar on alleviating the continuous cropping obstacle of Curcuma wenyujin Y.H. Chen & C. Ling[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(7): 1616-1620.

Figures/Tables 7

References 18

[1]	吴志刚, 陶正明, 徐杰. 温郁金GAP栽培技术标准操作规程[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2008, 49(2): 165-167.
[2]	李帆, 赵祺, 任仙樱, 等. 温郁金规范化生产研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2020, 48(10): 19-20,35.
[3]	汤璐璐, 孙贝贝, 李小宁, 等. 基于GC-MS技术比较分析温郁金源一株三药中挥发油成分[J]. 中药材, 2021, 44(7): 1675-1679.
[4]	顾薇, 毛春芹, 张季, 等. 加工炮制过程对温莪术活血化瘀功效的影响[J]. 中成药, 2018, 40(7): 1576-1580.
[5]	林敬祯, 黄鼎, 谭勇, 等. 中药莪术本草考证[J]. 亚太传统医药, 2023, 19(3): 189-192.
[6]	袁玮, 秦宇雯, 陆兔林, 等. 温郁金、温莪术、片姜黄饮片的炮制工艺沿革及现代研究[J]. 中草药, 2018, 49(5): 1192-1200.
[7]	姜程曦, 熊伟, 陶正明, 等. 瑞安陶山温郁金规范化种植基地适宜性研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2010, 38(4):1807-1810.
[8]	翁佩莹, 郑红艳. 作物连作障碍的成因与机制及其消减策略[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2020, 49(2): 157-162.
[9]	何婧娜, 程晓辉. 蔬菜设施土壤连作障碍危害及防治技术[J]. 西北园艺(蔬菜), 2014(5): 40-42.
[10]	毛亦卉, 谭亮萍. 蔬菜连作障碍及其防控措施[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2011(16): 26-27.
[11]	吕丰娟, 肖运萍, 魏林根, 等. 根系分泌物的生态效应与作物连作障碍关系研究进展[J]. 江西农业学报, 2016, 28(10): 8-14.
[12]	宋延静, 龚骏. 施用生物质炭对土壤生态系统功能的影响[J]. 鲁东大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 26(4):361-365.
[13]	谭淑端, 朱明勇, 张克荣, 等. 深淹对狗牙根根际土壤酶活性及肥力的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2011, 19(1): 8-12.
[14]	邓满民, 蒋成爱. 不同热解温度生物炭对土壤和菜心生长的影响[J]. 农业与技术, 2023, 43(13):93-97.
[15]	韩光明, 孟军, 曹婷, 等. 生物炭对菠菜根际微生物及土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2012, 43(5):515-520.
[16]	唐光木, 葛春辉, 徐万里, 等. 施用生物黑炭对新疆灰漠土肥力与玉米生长的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2011, 30(9):1797-1802.
[17]	姚彤, 胡晓龙, 贾永红, 等. 玉米秸秆生物炭对天人菊土壤理化性质及根际土壤真菌群落结构的影响[J]. 南方农业学报, 2021, 52(4):942-950.
[18]	汪瑞, 李泽成, 王豪吉, 等. 烟秆炭对白及连作地的改良效果研究[J]. 云南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 40(1):68-73.

处理	株高/m	叶片长度/cm	分蘖数/个	单株块茎质量/kg	单株块根质量/kg
A	1.41±0.16 b	57.22±4.19 c	5.66±0.57 a	1.03±0.21 c	0.38±0.06 b
B	1.73±0.14 a	70.55±5.24 a	6.50±1.29 a	1.32±0.16 b	0.49±0.11 a
C	1.83±0.11 a	83.64±2.58 a	6.00±1.00 a	1.59±0.12 a	0.55±0.11 a
D	1.62±0.11 b	73.34±3.81 b	6.33±0.57 a	1.46±0.11 ab	0.48±0.07 a

处理	株高/m	叶片长度/cm	分蘖数/个	单株块茎质量/kg	单株块根质量/kg
A	1.41±0.16 b	57.22±4.19 c	5.66±0.57 a	1.03±0.21 c	0.38±0.06 b
B	1.73±0.14 a	70.55±5.24 a	6.50±1.29 a	1.32±0.16 b	0.49±0.11 a
C	1.83±0.11 a	83.64±2.58 a	6.00±1.00 a	1.59±0.12 a	0.55±0.11 a
D	1.62±0.11 b	73.34±3.81 b	6.33±0.57 a	1.46±0.11 ab	0.48±0.07 a

处理	叶片挥发油含量	莪术挥发油含量	姜黄挥发油含量
A	0.24±0.06 b	0.89±0.11 b	0.77±0.07 b
B	0.33±0.07 a	1.03±0.08 a	0.91±0.09 a
C	0.41±0.11 a	1.21±0.11 a	0.97±0.11 a
D	0.34±0.09 a	1.14±0.09 a	0.88±0.05 a

处理	叶片挥发油含量	莪术挥发油含量	姜黄挥发油含量
A	0.24±0.06 b	0.89±0.11 b	0.77±0.07 b
B	0.33±0.07 a	1.03±0.08 a	0.91±0.09 a
C	0.41±0.11 a	1.21±0.11 a	0.97±0.11 a
D	0.34±0.09 a	1.14±0.09 a	0.88±0.05 a

处理	地上部	块茎	块根
A	0.45±0.07 c	1.91±0.09 b	0.61±0.09 c
B	0.63±0.08 ab	2.01±0.12 b	0.73±0.11 bc
C	0.73±0.11 a	2.44±0.18 a	0.81±0.05 a
D	0.56±0.12 bc	2.12±0.11 b	0.77±0.07 b