
Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2025, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (9): 2253-2259.DOI: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20240613
Previous Articles Next Articles
LIU Yan(
), LIN Tianbao, WEI Jia, LIU Peigang, ZHU Yan, LYU Zhiqiang*(
)
Received:2024-07-25
Online:2025-09-11
Published:2025-10-14
CLC Number:
LIU Yan, LIN Tianbao, WEI Jia, LIU Peigang, ZHU Yan, LYU Zhiqiang. Comprehensive evaluation of nutritional quality of 12 mulberry leaves in Zhejiang Province[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(9): 2253-2259.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnykx.cn/EN/10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20240613
| 品种编号 | 桑树品种 | 品种编号 | 桑树品种 |
|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | 强桑1号 | S7 | 农桑14号 |
| S2 | 强桑2号 | S8 | 丰田2号 |
| S3 | 强桑3号 | S9 | 盛东1号 |
| S4 | 强桑5号 | S10 | 薪一圆 |
| S5 | 农桑8号 | S11 | 荷叶白 |
| S6 | 农桑12号 | S12 | 团头荷叶白 |
Table 1 Varieties and number of mulberries
| 品种编号 | 桑树品种 | 品种编号 | 桑树品种 |
|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | 强桑1号 | S7 | 农桑14号 |
| S2 | 强桑2号 | S8 | 丰田2号 |
| S3 | 强桑3号 | S9 | 盛东1号 |
| S4 | 强桑5号 | S10 | 薪一圆 |
| S5 | 农桑8号 | S11 | 荷叶白 |
| S6 | 农桑12号 | S12 | 团头荷叶白 |
| 品种 编号 | 粗蛋白含量 (x1)/% | 粗纤维含量 (x2)/% | 粗脂肪含量 (x3)/% | 总多糖含量 (x4)/(mg·g-1) | 生物碱含量 (x5)/(mg·g-1) | 蛋氨酸含量 (x6)/% | 赖氨酸含量 (x7)/% | 粗灰分含量 (x8)/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | 19.17±0.02 | 9.20±0.03 | 1.96±0.02 | 20.10±0.03 | 0.84±0.04 | 0.12±0.02 | 0.79±0.03 | 6.71±0.02 |
| S2 | 18.83±0.02 | 8.65±0.07 | 2.07±0.03 | 19.61±0.03 | 0.76±0.05 | 0.11±0.01 | 0.81±0.04 | 7.02±0.16 |
| S3 | 18.99±0.01 | 8.35±0.05 | 2.07±0.04 | 19.39±0.05 | 0.93±0.05 | 0.13±0.01 | 0.79±0.03 | 6.92±002 |
| S4 | 19.21±0.02 | 9.16±0.04 | 1.94±0.04 | 19.28±0.05 | 0.87±0.02 | 0.13±0.02 | 0.81±0.03 | 6.81±0.05 |
| S5 | 21.98±0.04 | 10.06±0.05 | 1.44±0.02 | 15.26±0.10 | 0.98±0.07 | 0.14±0.01 | 0.83±0.02 | 6.58±0.02 |
| S6 | 21.40±0.04 | 11.14±0.07 | 1.57±0.01 | 17.17±0.06 | 1.20±0.05 | 0.13±0.02 | 0.82±0.04 | 6.35±0.05 |
| S7 | 21.27±0.08 | 9.18±0.03 | 1.64±0.01 | 17.08±0.08 | 1.04±0.02 | 0.11±0.02 | 0.79±0.03 | 6.70±0.03 |
| S8 | 20.22±0.10 | 9.00±0.05 | 1.80±0.02 | 20.40±0.05 | 1.12±0.01 | 0.12±0.01 | 0.76±0.03 | 7.06±0.04 |
| S9 | 18.98±0.01 | 11.20±0.04 | 2.02±0.03 | 21.32±0.28 | 0.95±0.01 | 0.12±0.01 | 0.78±0.04 | 7.51±0.05 |
| S10 | 18.87±0.06 | 10.17±0.03 | 1.67±0.01 | 20.73±0.01 | 0.87±0.06 | 0.11±0.01 | 0.80±0.04 | 7.95±1.40 |
| S11 | 18.82±0.02 | 13.13±0.07 | 1.85±0.03 | 18.69±1.41 | 0.87±0.07 | 0.12±0.02 | 0.82±0.03 | 6.37±0.06 |
| S12 | 19.24±0.02 | 12.43±0.17 | 1.72±0.01 | 18.80±0.03 | 0.97±0.06 | 0.12±0.01 | 0.79±0.03 | 7.11±0.04 |
| 平均值 | 19.75 | 10.14 | 1.81 | 18.99 | 0.95 | 0.12 | 0.80 | 6.93 |
| 最大值 | 21.98 | 13.13 | 2.07 | 21.32 | 1.20 | 0.14 | 0.83 | 7.95 |
| 最小值 | 18.82 | 8.35 | 1.44 | 15.26 | 0.76 | 0.11 | 0.76 | 6.35 |
| SD | 1.16 | 1.53 | 0.21 | 1.74 | 0.12 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.46 |
| CV/% | 5.60 | 14.50 | 10.90 | 8.80 | 12.60 | 7.90 | 2.40 | 6.30 |
Table 2 Contents of nutrients of 12 mulberry leaves
| 品种 编号 | 粗蛋白含量 (x1)/% | 粗纤维含量 (x2)/% | 粗脂肪含量 (x3)/% | 总多糖含量 (x4)/(mg·g-1) | 生物碱含量 (x5)/(mg·g-1) | 蛋氨酸含量 (x6)/% | 赖氨酸含量 (x7)/% | 粗灰分含量 (x8)/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | 19.17±0.02 | 9.20±0.03 | 1.96±0.02 | 20.10±0.03 | 0.84±0.04 | 0.12±0.02 | 0.79±0.03 | 6.71±0.02 |
| S2 | 18.83±0.02 | 8.65±0.07 | 2.07±0.03 | 19.61±0.03 | 0.76±0.05 | 0.11±0.01 | 0.81±0.04 | 7.02±0.16 |
| S3 | 18.99±0.01 | 8.35±0.05 | 2.07±0.04 | 19.39±0.05 | 0.93±0.05 | 0.13±0.01 | 0.79±0.03 | 6.92±002 |
| S4 | 19.21±0.02 | 9.16±0.04 | 1.94±0.04 | 19.28±0.05 | 0.87±0.02 | 0.13±0.02 | 0.81±0.03 | 6.81±0.05 |
| S5 | 21.98±0.04 | 10.06±0.05 | 1.44±0.02 | 15.26±0.10 | 0.98±0.07 | 0.14±0.01 | 0.83±0.02 | 6.58±0.02 |
| S6 | 21.40±0.04 | 11.14±0.07 | 1.57±0.01 | 17.17±0.06 | 1.20±0.05 | 0.13±0.02 | 0.82±0.04 | 6.35±0.05 |
| S7 | 21.27±0.08 | 9.18±0.03 | 1.64±0.01 | 17.08±0.08 | 1.04±0.02 | 0.11±0.02 | 0.79±0.03 | 6.70±0.03 |
| S8 | 20.22±0.10 | 9.00±0.05 | 1.80±0.02 | 20.40±0.05 | 1.12±0.01 | 0.12±0.01 | 0.76±0.03 | 7.06±0.04 |
| S9 | 18.98±0.01 | 11.20±0.04 | 2.02±0.03 | 21.32±0.28 | 0.95±0.01 | 0.12±0.01 | 0.78±0.04 | 7.51±0.05 |
| S10 | 18.87±0.06 | 10.17±0.03 | 1.67±0.01 | 20.73±0.01 | 0.87±0.06 | 0.11±0.01 | 0.80±0.04 | 7.95±1.40 |
| S11 | 18.82±0.02 | 13.13±0.07 | 1.85±0.03 | 18.69±1.41 | 0.87±0.07 | 0.12±0.02 | 0.82±0.03 | 6.37±0.06 |
| S12 | 19.24±0.02 | 12.43±0.17 | 1.72±0.01 | 18.80±0.03 | 0.97±0.06 | 0.12±0.01 | 0.79±0.03 | 7.11±0.04 |
| 平均值 | 19.75 | 10.14 | 1.81 | 18.99 | 0.95 | 0.12 | 0.80 | 6.93 |
| 最大值 | 21.98 | 13.13 | 2.07 | 21.32 | 1.20 | 0.14 | 0.83 | 7.95 |
| 最小值 | 18.82 | 8.35 | 1.44 | 15.26 | 0.76 | 0.11 | 0.76 | 6.35 |
| SD | 1.16 | 1.53 | 0.21 | 1.74 | 0.12 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.46 |
| CV/% | 5.60 | 14.50 | 10.90 | 8.80 | 12.60 | 7.90 | 2.40 | 6.30 |
| 营养成分 | 粗蛋白含量 (x1) | 粗纤维含量 (x2) | 粗脂肪含量 (x3) | 总多糖含量 (x4) | 生物碱含量 (x5) | 蛋氨酸含量 (x6) | 赖氨酸含量 (x7) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 粗纤维含量(x2) | -0.077 | ||||||
| 粗脂肪含量(x3) | -0.799** | -0.291 | |||||
| 总多糖含量(x4) | -0.823** | -0.106 | 0.718** | ||||
| 生物碱含量(x5) | 0.711** | 0.136 | -0.585* | -0.379 | |||
| 蛋氨酸含量(x6) | 0.446 | -0.003 | -0.157 | -0.469 | 0.309 | ||
| 赖氨酸含量(x7) | 0.288 | 0.279 | -0.403 | -0.640* | -0.170 | 0.368 | |
| 粗灰分含量(x8) | -0.480 | -0.116 | 0.207 | 0.684** | -0.274 | 0.561* | -0.438 |
Table 3 Correlation coefficients between different nutrients contents in different varieties of mulberry leaves
| 营养成分 | 粗蛋白含量 (x1) | 粗纤维含量 (x2) | 粗脂肪含量 (x3) | 总多糖含量 (x4) | 生物碱含量 (x5) | 蛋氨酸含量 (x6) | 赖氨酸含量 (x7) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 粗纤维含量(x2) | -0.077 | ||||||
| 粗脂肪含量(x3) | -0.799** | -0.291 | |||||
| 总多糖含量(x4) | -0.823** | -0.106 | 0.718** | ||||
| 生物碱含量(x5) | 0.711** | 0.136 | -0.585* | -0.379 | |||
| 蛋氨酸含量(x6) | 0.446 | -0.003 | -0.157 | -0.469 | 0.309 | ||
| 赖氨酸含量(x7) | 0.288 | 0.279 | -0.403 | -0.640* | -0.170 | 0.368 | |
| 粗灰分含量(x8) | -0.480 | -0.116 | 0.207 | 0.684** | -0.274 | 0.561* | -0.438 |
| 指标 | 初始特征值 | 提取平方和载入 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 特征值 | 方差贡献率/% | 累计方差贡献率/% | 特征值 | 方差贡献率/% | 累计方差贡献率/% | |
| x1 | 3.883 | 48.543 | 48.543 | 3.883 | 48.543 | 48.543 |
| x2 | 1.419 | 17.737 | 66.280 | 1.419 | 17.737 | 66.280 |
| x3 | 1.193 | 14.907 | 81.187 | 1.193 | 14.907 | 81.187 |
| x4 | 0.827 | 10.343 | 91.530 | |||
| x5 | 0.455 | 5.690 | 97.220 | |||
| x6 | 0.125 | 1.561 | 98.780 | |||
| x7 | 0.061 | 0.763 | 99.543 | |||
| x8 | 0.037 | 0.457 | 100.000 | |||
Table 4 Characteristic values of principal component and variance contribution rates of nutrients contents in mulberry leaves
| 指标 | 初始特征值 | 提取平方和载入 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 特征值 | 方差贡献率/% | 累计方差贡献率/% | 特征值 | 方差贡献率/% | 累计方差贡献率/% | |
| x1 | 3.883 | 48.543 | 48.543 | 3.883 | 48.543 | 48.543 |
| x2 | 1.419 | 17.737 | 66.280 | 1.419 | 17.737 | 66.280 |
| x3 | 1.193 | 14.907 | 81.187 | 1.193 | 14.907 | 81.187 |
| x4 | 0.827 | 10.343 | 91.530 | |||
| x5 | 0.455 | 5.690 | 97.220 | |||
| x6 | 0.125 | 1.561 | 98.780 | |||
| x7 | 0.061 | 0.763 | 99.543 | |||
| x8 | 0.037 | 0.457 | 100.000 | |||
| 指标 | 主成分1 | 主成分2 | 主成分3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| x1 | 0.059 | 0.324 | -0.128 |
| x2 | -0.152 | 0.003 | 0.678 |
| x3 | 0.128 | -0.333 | -0.289 |
| x4 | -0.232 | -0.088 | -0.079 |
| x5 | -0.177 | 0.459 | -0.127 |
| x6 | 0.373 | -0.068 | -0.254 |
| x7 | 0.318 | -0.235 | 0.365 |
| x8 | -0.376 | 0.090 | 0.099 |
Table 5 Load matrix of principal component factors of nutrients contents in mulberry leaves
| 指标 | 主成分1 | 主成分2 | 主成分3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| x1 | 0.059 | 0.324 | -0.128 |
| x2 | -0.152 | 0.003 | 0.678 |
| x3 | 0.128 | -0.333 | -0.289 |
| x4 | -0.232 | -0.088 | -0.079 |
| x5 | -0.177 | 0.459 | -0.127 |
| x6 | 0.373 | -0.068 | -0.254 |
| x7 | 0.318 | -0.235 | 0.365 |
| x8 | -0.376 | 0.090 | 0.099 |
| 营养成分 | 信息熵值 | 信息效用值 | 权重系数/% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 粗蛋白含量 | 0.727 6 | 0.272 4 | 58.26 |
| 粗纤维含量 | 0.861 2 | 0.138 8 | 29.68 |
| 总多糖含量 | 0.943 6 | -0.056 4 | 12.06 |
Table 6 Weight of core indicators of nutrients contents in mulberry leaves
| 营养成分 | 信息熵值 | 信息效用值 | 权重系数/% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 粗蛋白含量 | 0.727 6 | 0.272 4 | 58.26 |
| 粗纤维含量 | 0.861 2 | 0.138 8 | 29.68 |
| 总多糖含量 | 0.943 6 | -0.056 4 | 12.06 |
| 品种 编号 | 灰色关联系数 | 加权关 联度 | 排序 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 粗蛋白 含量 | 粗纤维 含量 | 总多糖 含量 | |||
| S1 | 0.623 9 | 0.737 2 | 0.786 5 | 0.677 2 | 7 |
| S2 | 0.596 8 | 0.888 7 | 0.723 4 | 0.698 7 | 6 |
| S3 | 0.609 5 | 0.999 9 | 0.699 0 | 0.736 2 | 4 |
| S4 | 0.627 6 | 0.746 4 | 0.687 6 | 0.670 1 | 8 |
| S5 | 1.000 0 | 0.582 3 | 0.425 0 | 0.806 7 | 1 |
| S6 | 0.888 8 | 0.461 7 | 0.519 2 | 0.717 5 | 5 |
| S7 | 0.867 8 | 0.741 8 | 0.514 1 | 0.787 7 | 2 |
| S8 | 0.725 6 | 0.786 5 | 0.829 2 | 0.756 1 | 3 |
| S9 | 0.608 4 | 0.456 5 | 1.000 0 | 0.610 6 | 10 |
| S10 | 0.599 8 | 0.568 1 | 0.883 1 | 0.624 6 | 9 |
| S11 | 0.595 7 | 0.333 3 | 0.630 2 | 0.522 0 | 12 |
| S12 | 0.629 8 | 0.369 3 | 0.640 4 | 0.553 8 | 11 |
Table 7 Grey correlation analysis of nutrients contents in different varieties of mulberry leaves
| 品种 编号 | 灰色关联系数 | 加权关 联度 | 排序 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 粗蛋白 含量 | 粗纤维 含量 | 总多糖 含量 | |||
| S1 | 0.623 9 | 0.737 2 | 0.786 5 | 0.677 2 | 7 |
| S2 | 0.596 8 | 0.888 7 | 0.723 4 | 0.698 7 | 6 |
| S3 | 0.609 5 | 0.999 9 | 0.699 0 | 0.736 2 | 4 |
| S4 | 0.627 6 | 0.746 4 | 0.687 6 | 0.670 1 | 8 |
| S5 | 1.000 0 | 0.582 3 | 0.425 0 | 0.806 7 | 1 |
| S6 | 0.888 8 | 0.461 7 | 0.519 2 | 0.717 5 | 5 |
| S7 | 0.867 8 | 0.741 8 | 0.514 1 | 0.787 7 | 2 |
| S8 | 0.725 6 | 0.786 5 | 0.829 2 | 0.756 1 | 3 |
| S9 | 0.608 4 | 0.456 5 | 1.000 0 | 0.610 6 | 10 |
| S10 | 0.599 8 | 0.568 1 | 0.883 1 | 0.624 6 | 9 |
| S11 | 0.595 7 | 0.333 3 | 0.630 2 | 0.522 0 | 12 |
| S12 | 0.629 8 | 0.369 3 | 0.640 4 | 0.553 8 | 11 |
| [1] | 颜书锐, 曾珠, 陈代文, 等. 桑叶的营养价值及其在畜牧生产中的应用[J]. 蚕学通讯, 2024, 44(2):47-60. |
| [2] | 吕志强, 朱燕, 吴云翔. 浙江省桑树种质资源对我国蚕业的贡献[J]. 蚕桑通报, 2005, 36(3):5-9. |
| [3] | 叶爱红, 周文林, 孟智启, 等. 工厂化全龄人工饲料育专用蚕品种中2016×日2016的育成[J]. 蚕业科学, 2021, 47(6): 537-544. |
| [4] | 冯永德. 桑叶茶功效与养生应用研究进展[J]. 四川蚕业, 2012, 40(4):52-56. |
| [5] | 王娜, 褚衍亮, 方荣俊, 等. 几种桑树品种和叶位主要营养及可利用分析[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2008, 29(8): 146-150. |
| [6] | 敬成俊, 代方银, 杜木英, 等. 10份不同地理来源桑种质资源冬桑叶中的营养与活性成分含量测定[J]. 蚕业科学, 2014, 40(2): 339-343. |
| [7] | 万永辉, 阿不都赛买提·艾买提, 龚明, 等. 30份桑种质资源叶的营养品质分析评价[J]. 蚕桑通报, 2023, 54(3): 21-24. |
| [8] | 梁贵秋, 祁广军, 何雪梅, 等. 广西蚕区21个桑树品种的桑叶营养与保健品质评价[J]. 蚕业科学, 2015, 41(4): 701-709. |
| [9] | 梁昕景, 夏玲, 王学林, 等. 基于隶属函数法对34份黄皮厚皮甜瓜种质资源的综合评价[J]. 热带农业科学, 2022, 42(3):39-44. |
| [10] | 文海朝, 张溪芸, 李红姣. 基于主成分分析法对不同杀青方式桑叶品质影响的综合评价[J]. 蚕业科学, 2022, 48(3):247-260. |
| [11] | 薛天源, 鲁金春子, 何思晓, 等. 286份甘蓝型油菜种质苗期耐盐碱性综合评价[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2024, 25(3):356-372. |
| [12] | 于艳奇, 杨明源, 吕春茂, 等. 基于主成分及聚类分析的板栗品质综合评价[J]. 食品工业科技, 2025, 46(2): 280-291. |
| [13] | 饶庆琳, 姜敏, 刘选轶, 等. 贵州296份花生种质资源遗传多样性及综合评价[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2024, 25(3): 373-385. |
| [14] | JIAO J Q, JIN M J, LIU H, et al. Application of melatonin in kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis) alleviated chilling injury during cold storage[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2022, 296: 110876. |
| [15] | 吕伟, 文飞, 韩俊梅, 等. 芝麻种质资源苗期抗旱性鉴定及灰色关联度分析[J]. 种子, 2022, 41(12): 106-112. |
| [16] | 吴鹏鑫, 王胜男, 王嘉麟, 等. 基于主成分分析和隶属函数分析研究刈割期和留茬高度对全株玉米青贮饲用价值的影响[J/OL]. 动物营养学报, 2024: 1-14. (2024-06-05). |
| [17] | ZHAO T, PAN X J, OU Z G, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of waterlogging tolerance of eleven Canna cultivars at flowering stage[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2022, 296:110890. |
| [18] | 崔梦迪, 王军, 陈丹, 等. 陕西4个主栽品种桑叶品质评价[J]. 食品工业科技, 2022, 43(3): 275-283. |
| [19] | 刘军, 肖更生, 廖森泰, 等. 不同品种桑叶的营养组成与品质评价[J]. 现代食品科技, 2011, 27(12): 1520-1523,1526. |
| [20] | 张钰瑶, 李灵, 邢慧子, 等. 四川省主要栽种桑树品种的桑叶药用活性成分含量评价[J]. 中国蚕业, 2023, 44(3): 1-4. |
| [21] | 蒋子洁, 侯启瑞, 侯文玉, 等. 桑叶、构树叶、榆树叶营养价值、抗营养因子及其在畜牧生产中的应用[J]. 饲料工业, 2023, 44(18): 25-29. |
| [1] | HU Tiejun, ZHOU Fei, JIN Shuquan, WANG Feng, CHEN Yutiao. Selection and evaluation of water-saving and drought-resistant rice adaptability in newly (reclaimed) cultivated land in mountainous and hilly areas [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(9): 2084-2089. |
| [2] | WANG Huilai, WANG Yin, WU Dongtao, YE Zhengqian. Evaluation of cultivated land fertility in typical hilly mountainous areas of Southwestern Zhejiang [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(8): 2008-2014. |
| [3] | ZHANG Jinjun, CHEN Yaqing, ZHU Huanzhi, XIA Huili. Quality differences of Polygonatum filipes in different growth years [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(7): 1612-1615. |
| [4] | ZHANG Yunhong, REN Ziwen, MAO Jiawei, YANG Yonghui, GAO Cuimin, HAN Weifeng, LIU Xiaoqi. Effects of humic acids on the growth and drought resistance of wheat seedlings [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(4): 885-892. |
| [5] | NIU Zhe, ZHAI Tongtong, YU Lu, LIU Wei, HAO Liyuan, ZHANG Leixiao, YE Xiaorui. Comprehensive evaluation of 26 varieties of Hydrangea macrophylla in coastal area of Tianjin [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(3): 667-673. |
| [6] | YANG Chunya, WU Dongyang, TAN Huiling, YE Yu, ZHAO Zhongqiu, LI Yongtao, XU Huijuan. Effects of pig manure instead of partial nitrogen fertilizer on soil quality, yield and vitamin C content of Chinese flowering cabbage [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(2): 354-362. |
| [7] | LI Jinlong, LONG Yaqin, YIN Liqiong, TONG Jiayin, LUO Ziwen, QU Hao, LIU Fuqiao, CHEN Linbo. Differential analysis of internal substances in tea under different tree management modes [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(7): 1567-1570. |
| [8] | YI Bo, XU Yunchen, WU Yun, YU Xiaohua, YUAN Can, LYU Qundan, XIA Yiping. Evaluation of ornamental and edible LA lily cultivars based on principal component and cluster analyses [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(7): 1639-1645. |
| [9] | CAI Jinhua. Correlation and cluster analysis of agronomic traits of wheat germplasm resources [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(6): 1316-1319. |
| [10] | CAI Yi, YANG Jian, YANG Yang, CHENG Zhimin, XIE Bing, TANG Ming, YANG Yide, YAN Min. Comprehensive evaluation of new flue-cured tobacco varieties in Yibin [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(6): 1346-1350. |
| [11] | JI Zhenmeng, SHEN Yesong, YIN Min, ZHU Li, LI Yafang, SUN Kouzhong. Principal component analysis of yield and traits of sweet corn varieties in Yancheng City [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(4): 908-912. |
| [12] | Jingyang QIAN, Qin LI, Lili LU, Jiasong MENG, Jun TAO, Daqiu ZHAO. Diversity analysis of lateral branch traits among different Paeonia lactiflora Pall. varieties [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(2): 362-370. |
| [13] | SU Siyuan, ZHANG Zhiyong, HU Chunmei, LIU Binbin, LIU Junfeng, WANG Honglin, KOU Jing, WU Jianmei. Effects of disease and insect pests on nutrient composition of mulberry leaves and economic characters of silkworm [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(11): 2733-2737. |
| [14] | HUANG Ting, ZUO Zhong, FAN Jinxin. Comprehensive evaluation of 7 salt tolerant greening tree species based on grey correlation analysis method [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(10): 2443-2446. |
| [15] | WANG Anjie, HUA Lifeng, ZHOU Lixia, ZHANG Fenglin, WANG Zhaohong. Factor and cluster analysis of quantitative characters in Bombyx mori germplasm resources [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(10): 2470-2476. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||