
Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2025, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (12): 3002-3007.DOI: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20250546
Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHU Mengfei1(
), ZHOU Pingping2, ZHENG Ting3, WU Jiang3,*(
)
Received:2025-07-30
Online:2025-12-11
Published:2025-12-17
CLC Number:
ZHU Mengfei, ZHOU Pingping, ZHENG Ting, WU Jiang. Effects of growth regulator treatments on fruit quality of Vitis davidii Foëx[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(12): 3002-3007.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnykx.cn/EN/10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20250546
| 处理 | 果穗重/ g | 果穗纵径/ cm | 果穗横径/ cm | 单粒重/ g | 果粒纵径/ cm | 果粒横径/ cm | 种子数目 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 盛花期处理 | T0 | 273.10±51.03 g | 18.40±1.78 d | 11.13±0.95 c | 3.84±0.02 g | 2.05±0.01 d | 1.83±0.01 g | 2.83 b |
| T1 | 286.77±71.11 d | 17.03±4.06 g | 14.27±2.98 a | 5.02±0.02 e | 2.15±0.01 c | 2.06±0.01 d | 3.42 a | |
| T2 | 283.37±18.19 e | 17.23±0.94 f | 9.60±0.63 g | 5.38±0.21 c | 2.27±0.01 b | 2.07±0.02 c | 2.55 f | |
| T3 | 274.37±8.03 f | 19.70±1.12 c | 10.67±1.39 d | 5.51±0.01 b | 2.27±0.01 b | 2.17±0.05 a | 2.63 e | |
| T4 | 303.20±17.86 b | 20.87±0.81 a | 11.90±0.56 b | 5.61±0.18 a | 2.30±0.02 a | 2.09±0.05 b | 2.78 d | |
| T5 | 301.57±20.16 c | 17.87±4.87 e | 9.83±1.01 f | 5.09±0.28 d | 2.13±0.03 c | 2.05±0.05 e | 2.23 g | |
| T6 | 367.30±38.50 a | 19.87±3.63 b | 10.33±0.85 e | 4.42±0.20 f | 2.07±0.01 d | 1.97±0.04 f | 2.80 c | |
| 终花期处理 | T0 | 266.10±29.68 g | 18.70±0.88 e | 10.73±1.21 e | 3.81±0.12 g | 2.17±0.01 d | 1.85±0.02 e | 3.11 b |
| T1 | 296.50±61.89 e | 19.70±4.80 c | 11.73±4.01 d | 4.82±0.23 f | 2.14±0.02 e | 2.03±0.03 d | 2.66 g | |
| T2 | 293.07±44.93 f | 19.40±0.98 d | 10.13±0.68 g | 6.13±0.30 a | 2.26±0.10 b | 2.06±0.09 b | 2.84 c | |
| T3 | 327.17±54.58 c | 20.67±3.84 a | 10.67±2.27 f | 5.74±0.11 b | 2.32±0.04 a | 2.15±0.04 a | 2.76 e | |
| T4 | 309.53±70.79 d | 18.33±5.11 f | 12.07±1.68 b | 5.18±0.06 c | 2.22±0.07 c | 2.06±0.02 b | 2.69 f | |
| T5 | 507.75±98.55 a | 19.75±1.91 b | 13.05±3.18 a | 4.84±0.19 e | 2.12±0.02 f | 2.04±0.01 c | 2.80 d | |
| T6 | 389.70±72.63 b | 17.70±0.69 g | 11.85±0.52 c | 4.91±0.24 d | 2.11±0.04 f | 2.04±0.01 c | 3.40 a | |
Table 1 Appearance quality of Vitis davidii Foëx fruit under seedless expansion treatment
| 处理 | 果穗重/ g | 果穗纵径/ cm | 果穗横径/ cm | 单粒重/ g | 果粒纵径/ cm | 果粒横径/ cm | 种子数目 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 盛花期处理 | T0 | 273.10±51.03 g | 18.40±1.78 d | 11.13±0.95 c | 3.84±0.02 g | 2.05±0.01 d | 1.83±0.01 g | 2.83 b |
| T1 | 286.77±71.11 d | 17.03±4.06 g | 14.27±2.98 a | 5.02±0.02 e | 2.15±0.01 c | 2.06±0.01 d | 3.42 a | |
| T2 | 283.37±18.19 e | 17.23±0.94 f | 9.60±0.63 g | 5.38±0.21 c | 2.27±0.01 b | 2.07±0.02 c | 2.55 f | |
| T3 | 274.37±8.03 f | 19.70±1.12 c | 10.67±1.39 d | 5.51±0.01 b | 2.27±0.01 b | 2.17±0.05 a | 2.63 e | |
| T4 | 303.20±17.86 b | 20.87±0.81 a | 11.90±0.56 b | 5.61±0.18 a | 2.30±0.02 a | 2.09±0.05 b | 2.78 d | |
| T5 | 301.57±20.16 c | 17.87±4.87 e | 9.83±1.01 f | 5.09±0.28 d | 2.13±0.03 c | 2.05±0.05 e | 2.23 g | |
| T6 | 367.30±38.50 a | 19.87±3.63 b | 10.33±0.85 e | 4.42±0.20 f | 2.07±0.01 d | 1.97±0.04 f | 2.80 c | |
| 终花期处理 | T0 | 266.10±29.68 g | 18.70±0.88 e | 10.73±1.21 e | 3.81±0.12 g | 2.17±0.01 d | 1.85±0.02 e | 3.11 b |
| T1 | 296.50±61.89 e | 19.70±4.80 c | 11.73±4.01 d | 4.82±0.23 f | 2.14±0.02 e | 2.03±0.03 d | 2.66 g | |
| T2 | 293.07±44.93 f | 19.40±0.98 d | 10.13±0.68 g | 6.13±0.30 a | 2.26±0.10 b | 2.06±0.09 b | 2.84 c | |
| T3 | 327.17±54.58 c | 20.67±3.84 a | 10.67±2.27 f | 5.74±0.11 b | 2.32±0.04 a | 2.15±0.04 a | 2.76 e | |
| T4 | 309.53±70.79 d | 18.33±5.11 f | 12.07±1.68 b | 5.18±0.06 c | 2.22±0.07 c | 2.06±0.02 b | 2.69 f | |
| T5 | 507.75±98.55 a | 19.75±1.91 b | 13.05±3.18 a | 4.84±0.19 e | 2.12±0.02 f | 2.04±0.01 c | 2.80 d | |
| T6 | 389.70±72.63 b | 17.70±0.69 g | 11.85±0.52 c | 4.91±0.24 d | 2.11±0.04 f | 2.04±0.01 c | 3.40 a | |
| 处理 | 角质层 厚度/ mm | 表皮 厚度/ mm | 亚表皮 厚度/ mm | 果肉 细胞 数量 | 果肉细胞 平均面积/ mm2 | 表皮细胞 数量 | 表皮细胞 总面积/ mm2 | 表皮细胞 平均面积/ mm2 | 亚表皮 细胞 数量 | 亚表皮 细胞总 面积/mm2 | 亚表皮 细胞平均 面积/mm2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 盛花期处理 | T0 | 0.008 80 | 0.009 90 | 0.702 62 | 31.00 | 0.016 38 | 44.00 | 0.010 07 | 0.000 23 | 161.67 | 0.414 74 | 0.002 64 |
| T1 | 0.009 91 | 0.011 50 | 0.812 59 | 47.67 | 0.010 30 | 46.33 | 0.012 31 | 0.000 27 | 167.00 | 0.377 86 | 0.002 27 | |
| T2 | 0.009 71 | 0.012 93 | 0.788 82 | 26.67 | 0.020 29 | 63.67 | 0.012 12 | 0.000 19 | 232.00 | 0.416 02 | 0.001 83 | |
| T3 | 0.010 11 | 0.011 61 | 0.765 46 | 40.67 | 0.012 02 | 47.67 | 0.012 09 | 0.000 25 | 176.67 | 0.409 43 | 0.002 36 | |
| T4 | 0.010 31 | 0.011 80 | 0.755 03 | 37.67 | 0.013 06 | 47.00 | 0.010 76 | 0.000 23 | 156.33 | 0.417 31 | 0.002 69 | |
| T5 | 0.010 25 | 0.013 61 | 0.850 98 | 31.33 | 0.016 55 | 45.33 | 0.013 27 | 0.000 29 | 174.33 | 0.420 29 | 0.002 43 | |
| T6 | 0.012 22 | 0.012 31 | 0.944 17 | 39.00 | 0.012 80 | 47.00 | 0.012 57 | 0.000 27 | 195.67 | 0.421 33 | 0.002 25 | |
| 终花期处理 | T0 | 0.007 41 | 0.010 81 | 0.715 17 | 34.33 | 0.016 14 | 47.67 | 0.010 30 | 0.000 21 | 170.67 | 0.425 15 | 0.002 53 |
| T1 | 0.008 33 | 0.013 31 | 0.866 12 | 53.00 | 0.009 59 | 52.00 | 0.013 15 | 0.000 26 | 237.67 | 0.411 30 | 0.001 80 | |
| T2 | 0.009 30 | 0.012 10 | 0.841 27 | 49.67 | 0.009 90 | 50.00 | 0.011 87 | 0.000 24 | 153.67 | 0.416 09 | 0.002 73 | |
| T3 | 0.007 82 | 0.011 11 | 0.775 37 | 38.67 | 0.012 65 | 47.33 | 0.011 87 | 0.000 25 | 169.33 | 0.421 78 | 0.002 49 | |
| T4 | 0.010 71 | 0.011 84 | 0.711 60 | 42.00 | 0.011 65 | 48.33 | 0.012 39 | 0.000 26 | 236.33 | 0.418 75 | 0.001 85 | |
| T5 | 0.010 00 | 0.012 02 | 1.034 33 | 30.00 | 0.016 31 | 41.67 | 0.011 83 | 0.000 29 | 191.00 | 0.428 13 | 0.002 31 | |
| T6 | 0.009 63 | 0.013 61 | 0.989 83 | 34.00 | 0.014 83 | 44.33 | 0.011 51 | 0.000 26 | 213.67 | 0.414 99 | 0.002 01 | |
Table 2 Cell related indicators of Vitis davidii Foëx fruit under seedless expansion treatment
| 处理 | 角质层 厚度/ mm | 表皮 厚度/ mm | 亚表皮 厚度/ mm | 果肉 细胞 数量 | 果肉细胞 平均面积/ mm2 | 表皮细胞 数量 | 表皮细胞 总面积/ mm2 | 表皮细胞 平均面积/ mm2 | 亚表皮 细胞 数量 | 亚表皮 细胞总 面积/mm2 | 亚表皮 细胞平均 面积/mm2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 盛花期处理 | T0 | 0.008 80 | 0.009 90 | 0.702 62 | 31.00 | 0.016 38 | 44.00 | 0.010 07 | 0.000 23 | 161.67 | 0.414 74 | 0.002 64 |
| T1 | 0.009 91 | 0.011 50 | 0.812 59 | 47.67 | 0.010 30 | 46.33 | 0.012 31 | 0.000 27 | 167.00 | 0.377 86 | 0.002 27 | |
| T2 | 0.009 71 | 0.012 93 | 0.788 82 | 26.67 | 0.020 29 | 63.67 | 0.012 12 | 0.000 19 | 232.00 | 0.416 02 | 0.001 83 | |
| T3 | 0.010 11 | 0.011 61 | 0.765 46 | 40.67 | 0.012 02 | 47.67 | 0.012 09 | 0.000 25 | 176.67 | 0.409 43 | 0.002 36 | |
| T4 | 0.010 31 | 0.011 80 | 0.755 03 | 37.67 | 0.013 06 | 47.00 | 0.010 76 | 0.000 23 | 156.33 | 0.417 31 | 0.002 69 | |
| T5 | 0.010 25 | 0.013 61 | 0.850 98 | 31.33 | 0.016 55 | 45.33 | 0.013 27 | 0.000 29 | 174.33 | 0.420 29 | 0.002 43 | |
| T6 | 0.012 22 | 0.012 31 | 0.944 17 | 39.00 | 0.012 80 | 47.00 | 0.012 57 | 0.000 27 | 195.67 | 0.421 33 | 0.002 25 | |
| 终花期处理 | T0 | 0.007 41 | 0.010 81 | 0.715 17 | 34.33 | 0.016 14 | 47.67 | 0.010 30 | 0.000 21 | 170.67 | 0.425 15 | 0.002 53 |
| T1 | 0.008 33 | 0.013 31 | 0.866 12 | 53.00 | 0.009 59 | 52.00 | 0.013 15 | 0.000 26 | 237.67 | 0.411 30 | 0.001 80 | |
| T2 | 0.009 30 | 0.012 10 | 0.841 27 | 49.67 | 0.009 90 | 50.00 | 0.011 87 | 0.000 24 | 153.67 | 0.416 09 | 0.002 73 | |
| T3 | 0.007 82 | 0.011 11 | 0.775 37 | 38.67 | 0.012 65 | 47.33 | 0.011 87 | 0.000 25 | 169.33 | 0.421 78 | 0.002 49 | |
| T4 | 0.010 71 | 0.011 84 | 0.711 60 | 42.00 | 0.011 65 | 48.33 | 0.012 39 | 0.000 26 | 236.33 | 0.418 75 | 0.001 85 | |
| T5 | 0.010 00 | 0.012 02 | 1.034 33 | 30.00 | 0.016 31 | 41.67 | 0.011 83 | 0.000 29 | 191.00 | 0.428 13 | 0.002 31 | |
| T6 | 0.009 63 | 0.013 61 | 0.989 83 | 34.00 | 0.014 83 | 44.33 | 0.011 51 | 0.000 26 | 213.67 | 0.414 99 | 0.002 01 | |
| 处理 | TSS含量/ (°Bx) | 白藜芦醇含量/ (mg·g-1) | 单宁含量/ (mg·g-1) | 总酚含量/ (μg·g-1) | 总黄酮含量/ (mg·g-1) | 花色苷含量/ (mg·kg-1) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 盛花期处理 | T0 | 14.52±0.32 a | 0.18±0.01 a | 1.10±0.12 b | 0.15±0.01 b | 3.17±0.02 b | 2.49±0.30 a |
| T1 | 12.93±0.57 d | 0.10±0.01 e | 0.35±0.05 e | 0.10±0.02 d | 2.77±0.06 f | 1.52±0.24 d | |
| T2 | 12.72±0.50 f | 0.10±0.01 e | 0.30±0.04 f | 0.16±0.02 a | 3.09±0.06 c | 0.85±0.04 f | |
| T3 | 13.22±0.61 b | 0.11±0.01 d | 0.25±0.03 g | 0.10±0.01 d | 3.25±0.08 a | 1.58±0.09 c | |
| T4 | 12.86±0.31 e | 0.09±0.01 f | 1.21±0.20 a | 0.10±0.01 d | 3.00±0.87 d | 1.60±0.08 b | |
| T5 | 12.07±0.53 g | 0.14±0.01 b | 0.58±0.03 c | 0.11±0.02 c | 2.98±0.06 e | 1.23±0.32 e | |
| T6 | 13.03±0.90 c | 0.13±0.01 c | 0.48±0.08 d | 0.06±0.01 e | 2.74±0.08 g | 0.63±0.21 g | |
| 终花期处理 | T0 | 13.77±0.27 a | 0.18±0.01 a | 0.67±0.13 a | 0.13±0.01 b | 3.01±0.01 d | 1.94±0.43 b |
| T1 | 12.46±0.50 d | 0.13±0.01 c | 0.38±0.10 f | 0.11±0.01 c | 2.80±0.06 e | 1.21±0.05 d | |
| T2 | 12.78±0.28 b | 0.14±0.01 b | 0.43±0.10 d | 0.13±0.01 b | 2.73±0.01 f | 0.51±0.06 e | |
| T3 | 12.67±0.35 c | 0.12±0.01 d | 0.42±0.06 e | 0.03±0.02 e | 3.28±0.12 a | 1.80±0.31 c | |
| T4 | 12.46±0.32 d | 0.12±0.01 d | 0.47±0.12 c | 0.13±0.01 b | 3.17±0.06 b | 1.98±0.17 b | |
| T5 | 11.98±0.36 e | 0.12±0.01 d | 0.59±0.04 b | 0.15±0.02 a | 3.11±0.04 c | 2.04±0.68 a | |
| T6 | 12.80±0.58 b | 0.12±0.01 d | 0.30±0.04 g | 0.04±0.02 d | 3.02±0.04 d | 2.02±0.18 a | |
Table 3 Intrinsic quality of Vitis davidii Foëx fruit under seedless expansion treatment
| 处理 | TSS含量/ (°Bx) | 白藜芦醇含量/ (mg·g-1) | 单宁含量/ (mg·g-1) | 总酚含量/ (μg·g-1) | 总黄酮含量/ (mg·g-1) | 花色苷含量/ (mg·kg-1) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 盛花期处理 | T0 | 14.52±0.32 a | 0.18±0.01 a | 1.10±0.12 b | 0.15±0.01 b | 3.17±0.02 b | 2.49±0.30 a |
| T1 | 12.93±0.57 d | 0.10±0.01 e | 0.35±0.05 e | 0.10±0.02 d | 2.77±0.06 f | 1.52±0.24 d | |
| T2 | 12.72±0.50 f | 0.10±0.01 e | 0.30±0.04 f | 0.16±0.02 a | 3.09±0.06 c | 0.85±0.04 f | |
| T3 | 13.22±0.61 b | 0.11±0.01 d | 0.25±0.03 g | 0.10±0.01 d | 3.25±0.08 a | 1.58±0.09 c | |
| T4 | 12.86±0.31 e | 0.09±0.01 f | 1.21±0.20 a | 0.10±0.01 d | 3.00±0.87 d | 1.60±0.08 b | |
| T5 | 12.07±0.53 g | 0.14±0.01 b | 0.58±0.03 c | 0.11±0.02 c | 2.98±0.06 e | 1.23±0.32 e | |
| T6 | 13.03±0.90 c | 0.13±0.01 c | 0.48±0.08 d | 0.06±0.01 e | 2.74±0.08 g | 0.63±0.21 g | |
| 终花期处理 | T0 | 13.77±0.27 a | 0.18±0.01 a | 0.67±0.13 a | 0.13±0.01 b | 3.01±0.01 d | 1.94±0.43 b |
| T1 | 12.46±0.50 d | 0.13±0.01 c | 0.38±0.10 f | 0.11±0.01 c | 2.80±0.06 e | 1.21±0.05 d | |
| T2 | 12.78±0.28 b | 0.14±0.01 b | 0.43±0.10 d | 0.13±0.01 b | 2.73±0.01 f | 0.51±0.06 e | |
| T3 | 12.67±0.35 c | 0.12±0.01 d | 0.42±0.06 e | 0.03±0.02 e | 3.28±0.12 a | 1.80±0.31 c | |
| T4 | 12.46±0.32 d | 0.12±0.01 d | 0.47±0.12 c | 0.13±0.01 b | 3.17±0.06 b | 1.98±0.17 b | |
| T5 | 11.98±0.36 e | 0.12±0.01 d | 0.59±0.04 b | 0.15±0.02 a | 3.11±0.04 c | 2.04±0.68 a | |
| T6 | 12.80±0.58 b | 0.12±0.01 d | 0.30±0.04 g | 0.04±0.02 d | 3.02±0.04 d | 2.02±0.18 a | |
| 设施条件 | 果穗重/ g | 果穗纵径/ cm | 果穗横径/ cm | 单粒重/ g | 果粒纵径/ cm | 果粒横径/ cm | 种子数目 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 长廊 | 264.65±16.28 b | 19.70±1.84 a | 10.25±0.74 b | 4.60±0.11 a | 2.06±0.13 b | 1.87±0.12 b | 2.90 b |
| 大棚 | 282.88±46.77 a | 18.30±1.52 b | 11.25±0.83 a | 4.41±0.09 b | 2.15±0.02 a | 1.94±0.06 a | 3.30 a |
| 设施条件 | TSS含量/ (°Bx) | 白藜芦醇含量/ (mg·g-1) | 单宁含量/ (mg·g-1) | 总酚含量/ (μg·g-1) | 总黄酮含量/ (mg·g-1) | 花色苷含量/ (mg·kg-1) | |
| 长廊 | 12.95±0.22 b | 0.13±0.01 b | 0.25±0.06 b | 0.13±0.01 b | 2.77±0.05 b | 1.30±0.33 b | |
| 大棚 | 14.14±0.41 a | 0.16±0.01 a | 0.51±0.07 a | 0.23±0.06 a | 2.95±0.06 a | 2.80±0.13 a |
Table 4 Quality indicators of Vitis davidii Foëx under different facility cultivation conditions
| 设施条件 | 果穗重/ g | 果穗纵径/ cm | 果穗横径/ cm | 单粒重/ g | 果粒纵径/ cm | 果粒横径/ cm | 种子数目 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 长廊 | 264.65±16.28 b | 19.70±1.84 a | 10.25±0.74 b | 4.60±0.11 a | 2.06±0.13 b | 1.87±0.12 b | 2.90 b |
| 大棚 | 282.88±46.77 a | 18.30±1.52 b | 11.25±0.83 a | 4.41±0.09 b | 2.15±0.02 a | 1.94±0.06 a | 3.30 a |
| 设施条件 | TSS含量/ (°Bx) | 白藜芦醇含量/ (mg·g-1) | 单宁含量/ (mg·g-1) | 总酚含量/ (μg·g-1) | 总黄酮含量/ (mg·g-1) | 花色苷含量/ (mg·kg-1) | |
| 长廊 | 12.95±0.22 b | 0.13±0.01 b | 0.25±0.06 b | 0.13±0.01 b | 2.77±0.05 b | 1.30±0.33 b | |
| 大棚 | 14.14±0.41 a | 0.16±0.01 a | 0.51±0.07 a | 0.23±0.06 a | 2.95±0.06 a | 2.80±0.13 a |
| 处理 | 果穗重/ g | 果穗纵径/ cm | 果穗横径/ cm | 单粒重/ g | 果粒纵径/ cm | 果粒横径/ cm | 种子数目 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABA | 184.90±34.25 c | 16.23±3.13 d | 7.68±0.81 d | 4.48±0.07 c | 2.18±0.03 b | 1.94±0.01 c | 3.20 c |
| BR | 201.43±37.38 b | 17.75±2.76 b | 7.83±0.90 c | 4.67±0.06 b | 2.19±0.01 a | 1.96±0.01 b | 3.80 a |
| MeJA | 250.45±20.50 a | 18.75±1.86 a | 9.28±1.34 a | 4.79±0.27 a | 2.18±0.03 b | 2.00±0.04 a | 3.40 b |
| CK | 181.53±17.26 d | 16.28±1.44 c | 8.30±0.55 b | 4.30±0.12 d | 2.14±0.02 c | 1.91±0.02 d | 2.70 d |
| 处理 | TSS含量/ (°Bx) | 白藜芦醇含量/ (mg·g-1) | 单宁含量/ (mg·g-1) | 总酚含量/ (μg·g-1) | 总黄酮含量/ (mg·g-1) | 花色苷含量/ (mg·kg-1) | |
| ABA | 12.54±0.47 d | 0.12±0.01 b | 0.10±0.06 d | 0.13±0.03 b | 2.88±0.04 a | 1.50±0.20 b | |
| BR | 12.76±0.19 b | 0.20±0.01 a | 0.55±0.01 a | 0.08±0.01 c | 2.83±0.04 b | 2.40±0.17 a | |
| MeJA | 13.01±0.26 a | 0.12±0.01 b | 0.16±0.05 c | 0.08±0.01 c | 2.77±0.13 c | 1.20±0.11 c | |
| CK | 12.61±0.32 c | 0.11±0.01 c | 0.29±0.04 b | 0.23±0.06 a | 2.83±0.13 b | 1.50±0.33 b | |
Table 5 Quality indicators of Vitis davidii Foëx under different hormone treatments
| 处理 | 果穗重/ g | 果穗纵径/ cm | 果穗横径/ cm | 单粒重/ g | 果粒纵径/ cm | 果粒横径/ cm | 种子数目 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABA | 184.90±34.25 c | 16.23±3.13 d | 7.68±0.81 d | 4.48±0.07 c | 2.18±0.03 b | 1.94±0.01 c | 3.20 c |
| BR | 201.43±37.38 b | 17.75±2.76 b | 7.83±0.90 c | 4.67±0.06 b | 2.19±0.01 a | 1.96±0.01 b | 3.80 a |
| MeJA | 250.45±20.50 a | 18.75±1.86 a | 9.28±1.34 a | 4.79±0.27 a | 2.18±0.03 b | 2.00±0.04 a | 3.40 b |
| CK | 181.53±17.26 d | 16.28±1.44 c | 8.30±0.55 b | 4.30±0.12 d | 2.14±0.02 c | 1.91±0.02 d | 2.70 d |
| 处理 | TSS含量/ (°Bx) | 白藜芦醇含量/ (mg·g-1) | 单宁含量/ (mg·g-1) | 总酚含量/ (μg·g-1) | 总黄酮含量/ (mg·g-1) | 花色苷含量/ (mg·kg-1) | |
| ABA | 12.54±0.47 d | 0.12±0.01 b | 0.10±0.06 d | 0.13±0.03 b | 2.88±0.04 a | 1.50±0.20 b | |
| BR | 12.76±0.19 b | 0.20±0.01 a | 0.55±0.01 a | 0.08±0.01 c | 2.83±0.04 b | 2.40±0.17 a | |
| MeJA | 13.01±0.26 a | 0.12±0.01 b | 0.16±0.05 c | 0.08±0.01 c | 2.77±0.13 c | 1.20±0.11 c | |
| CK | 12.61±0.32 c | 0.11±0.01 c | 0.29±0.04 b | 0.23±0.06 a | 2.83±0.13 b | 1.50±0.33 b | |
| [1] | 郑婷, 魏灵珠, 罗飞雄, 等. 浙江8份特异刺葡萄种质资源植物学特征及扦插特点分析[J]. 中外葡萄与葡萄酒, 2024(4): 53-58. |
| [2] | 廖凯强. 不同架式对刺葡萄生长结果特性、生理特性变化和酿酒品质的影响[D]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2017. |
| [3] | 苏聪聪, 廖凯强, 陈星星, 等. 不同架式对刺葡萄果实品质的影响[J]. 中外葡萄与葡萄酒, 2017(5): 10-13. |
| [4] | CHENG J H, XIANG J, WEI L Z, et al. Metabolomic profiling and assessment of phenolic compounds derived from Vitis davidii foex cane and stem extracts[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2022, 23: 14873. |
| [5] | 石雪晖, 杨国顺, 刘昆玉, 等. 湖南省刺葡萄种质资源研究进展[J]. 中外葡萄与葡萄酒, 2014 (4): 47-49. |
| [6] | 梁静怡, 蔡晓月, 张剑侠. 植物生长调节剂处理对阳光玫瑰葡萄果实香气含量的影响[J]. 中国果树, 2024(9): 30-36. |
| [7] | ZHENG T, ZHAO P C, XIANG J, et al. Integrated transcriptomic and metabolomic analysis reveals the effects of forchlorfenuron and thidiazuron on flavonoid biosynthesis in table grape skins[J]. Current Plant Biology, 2024, 40: 100417. |
| [8] | WANG W, KHALIL-UR-REHMAN M, FENG J, et al. RNA-seq based transcriptomic analysis of CPPU treated grape berries and emission of volatile compounds[J]. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2017, 218: 155-166. |
| [9] | WANG W, KHALIL-UR-REHMAN M, WEI L L, et al. Effect of thidiazuron on terpene volatile constituents and terpenoid biosynthesis pathway gene expression of Shine Muscat (Vitis labrusca×V. vinifera) grape berries[J]. Molecules, 2020, 25(11): 2578. |
| [10] | ZHENG T, DONG T Y, HAIDER M S, et al. Brassinosteroid regulates 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA reductase to promote grape fruit development[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2020, 68(43):11987-11996. |
| [11] | 金欢淳, 金联宇, 陈亦雅, 等. 不同栽培措施对改善妮娜皇后葡萄果实着色与品质的效果[J]. 果树学报, 2024, 41(10): 2051-2066. |
| [12] | 任俊鹏, 郑焕, 江楠, 等. 脱落酸浸果对夏黑葡萄果实着色及品质的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2012, 40(11): 156-158. |
| [13] | 王继源, 冯娇, 侯旭东, 等. CPPU对‘阳光玫瑰’葡萄品质及香气合成相关基因表达的影响[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2016, 39(6): 915-923. |
| [14] | 魏玲玲. TDZ和留果量对‘阳光玫瑰’葡萄果实香气物质组分及含量的影响及DXS基因的功能分析[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2019. |
| [15] | 郑婷, 向江, 魏灵珠, 等. 基于WGCNA分析CPPU和TDZ对天工墨玉葡萄香气影响及关键基因挖掘[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2025, 37(2): 311-320. |
| [16] | JU Y L, LIU B C, XU X L, et al. Targeted metabolomic and transcript level analysis reveals the effects of exogenous strigolactone and methyl jasmonate on grape quality[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2022(299): 111009. |
| [17] | 谭欣宇, 禅和霖, 竺锡武. 茉莉酸甲酯浸果对刺葡萄果实花色苷含量的影响[J]. 现代园艺, 2025, 48(13): 32-35. |
| [18] | 李含晰. 不同类型刺葡萄及刺葡萄酒中白藜芦醇含量和变化规律研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2018. |
| [19] | 赵亚蒙, 尹春晓, 梁攀, 等. GA3与CPPU对刺葡萄无核化及果实品质的影响[J]. 中外葡萄与葡萄酒, 2018(1): 9-13. |
| [20] | 魏晓羽, 王跃进. 中国野生葡萄果皮解剖结构与白粉病抗性的相关性研究[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(6): 1200-1212. |
| [21] | 马丽, 高圣华, 朱绍坤, 等. 钙处理对‘巨峰’葡萄果实品质及果皮解剖结构的影响[J]. 北方果树, 2024(6): 23-26. |
| [22] | 薄流齐洋. 避雨栽培对刺葡萄生长发育及果实品质的影响[D]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2021. |
| [1] | JIANG Linfang, DONG Jun, CHEN Linghui, WANG Yuyang, HONG Li. Performance and evaluation of fruit quality for southern sweet cherry under double-film early-promotion cultivation [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(7): 1659-1663. |
| [2] | CUN Daize, LI Jing, DONG Jianmei, LAI Xinpu, YANG Di, PAN Li, DU Yuxia. Study on the quality change of citrus fruit at mature stage in hot and humid area of Yunnan [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(2): 386-394. |
| [3] | ZHU Longming, DENG Ping, YANG Qinghua, FU Xujun, LIU Bei, YUAN Fengjie. Identification of key traits affecting mechanized harvesting effect of vegetable soybeans [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(12): 2894-2900. |
| [4] | LIANG Senmiao, YU Zheping, SONG Yang, ZHOU Shu, ZHANG Shuwen. Effect of full steel pipe vertical trellis on the yield and fruit quality of Chinese bayberry [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(12): 2952-2955. |
| [5] | SHAO Zhiyong, WANG Tonglin, NIE Zhixing, GUO Saisai, WANG Hong, ZHENG Jirong. Effects of two substrate cultivation methods on growth, yield and quality of cherry tomatoes in winter facilities [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(11): 2627-2631. |
| [6] | LI Tonghua, ZHU Wenguo, LIANG Aixin, WANG Zihao, QIN Yuejun. Effect of amino acid organic water-soluble fertilizer on strawberry coloration, yield, and quality [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(11): 2663-2667. |
| [7] | LI Chenhao, KONG Haimin, LI Gang, HAO Yue, REN Haiying, WANG Jing, CHEN Yupei, YAN Jun, LIN Baoyi. Study on the effects of rapeseed cake organic fertilizer on soil fertility regulation and tree vigor improvement in facility cultivation bayberry orchards [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(11): 2668-2674. |
| [8] | WANG Liru, FANG Congling, SHEN Qunchao, FAN Linjie, HU Zhiming, PAN Zaiping, ZHOU Shuyi. Introduction performance of eleven fresh grape cultivars in Cixi City [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(10): 2381-2387. |
| [9] | LU Tao, LI Juan, CHEN Xuankuang, LI Hui, ZHUANG Huacai, HUANG Huixiang, ZHONG Wenhua, LI Caiqin, FAN Yan. Effects of different substrate ratios on growth and fruit quality of blueberry [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(10): 2405-2411. |
| [10] | YE Qingqing, YANG Jinbo, XIE Fanghao, MAO Xinhua. Influence of BioAg biological agent on composting efficiency [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(10): 2498-2501. |
| [11] | ZHENG Xiliang, SUN Li, QI Xingjiang, LIANG Senmiao, YU Zheping, ZHANG Qi, ZHANG Shuwen. Correlation analysis between fruit quality indicators and soil fertility factors in Chinese bayberry [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(9): 2112-2118. |
| [12] | FENG Renfang, WU Shaohui, LAN Liuxin. Study on the effect of water-soluble fertilizer on the quality of early-maturing Citrus unshiu Marc. cv. Miyagawa Wase [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(8): 1776-1780. |
| [13] | ZHANG Yubo, ZHANG Chengyi, LI Si, HE Yong, HE Yongchoulin, HU Meihua. Preliminary report of six new strawberry varieties planted in greenhouses in Fenghua District, Ningbo City [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(8): 1781-1785. |
| [14] | WEI Jiafeng, MA Xinyuan, ZHANG Ruiping. Effects of different application amount of silicon fertilizer on growth and fruit quality of apple [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(8): 1814-1820. |
| [15] | DI Huatao, LI Jinfeng, WAN Chunyan, CHEN Xueping, HUO Hengzhi, CHEN Bingyi. Effect of different composite substrate on growth and fruit quality of strawberry cultivar Benihoppe [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(8): 1821-1825. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||