
Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2025, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (2): 502-506.DOI: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20231117
Previous Articles Next Articles
NIU Tianxin1(
), ZHA Yan1, MA Huasheng1, XIONG Wei2, HUANG Yuqing1
Received:2023-11-19
Online:2025-02-11
Published:2025-03-24
CLC Number:
NIU Tianxin, ZHA Yan, MA Huasheng, XIONG Wei, HUANG Yuqing. Effects of different fertilization treatments on biodiversity of soil macrofauna of sweet potato in newly reclaimed mountain land[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(2): 502-506.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnykx.cn/EN/10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20231117
| 土层/cm | 处理1 | 处理2 | 处理3 | 处理4 | 处理5 | 平均值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0~5 | 4.99 | 3.13 | 3.57 | 3.22 | 4.80 | 3.94 |
| >5~10 | 9.60 | 11.15 | 9.63 | 7.48 | 7.56 | 9.08 |
| >10~15 | 11.67 | 12.66 | 11.24 | 8.50 | 11.84 | 11.18 |
Table 1 Soil moisture content in different soil layers under different fertilizer treatments 单位:%
| 土层/cm | 处理1 | 处理2 | 处理3 | 处理4 | 处理5 | 平均值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0~5 | 4.99 | 3.13 | 3.57 | 3.22 | 4.80 | 3.94 |
| >5~10 | 9.60 | 11.15 | 9.63 | 7.48 | 7.56 | 9.08 |
| >10~15 | 11.67 | 12.66 | 11.24 | 8.50 | 11.84 | 11.18 |
| 土层/cm | 处理1 | 处理2 | 处理3 | 处理4 | 处理5 | 平均值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0~5 | 6.47 | 6.29 | 6.04 | 6.13 | 6.12 | 6.21 |
| >5~10 | 6.25 | 6.10 | 5.96 | 6.04 | 6.21 | 6.11 |
| >10~15 | 5.98 | 5.95 | 6.19 | 6.42 | 6.49 | 6.21 |
| 平均 | 6.23 | 6.11 | 6.06 | 6.20 | 6.27 | 6.17 |
Table 2 Changes in pH values of different soil layers under different fertilizer treatments
| 土层/cm | 处理1 | 处理2 | 处理3 | 处理4 | 处理5 | 平均值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0~5 | 6.47 | 6.29 | 6.04 | 6.13 | 6.12 | 6.21 |
| >5~10 | 6.25 | 6.10 | 5.96 | 6.04 | 6.21 | 6.11 |
| >10~15 | 5.98 | 5.95 | 6.19 | 6.42 | 6.49 | 6.21 |
| 平均 | 6.23 | 6.11 | 6.06 | 6.20 | 6.27 | 6.17 |
| 类型 | 处理 | 重复1 | 重复2 | 重复3 | 平均值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 细菌 | 空白 | 27.4×106 | 30.8×106 | 27.3×106 | 28.5×106 |
| 施肥处理 | 40.7×106 | 38.0×106 | 42.8×106 | 40.5×106 | |
| 真菌 | 空白 | 4.11×106 | 5.03×106 | 4.91×106 | 4.68×106 |
| 施肥处理 | 12.32×106 | 14.03×106 | 12.55×106 | 12.97×106 |
Table 3 Number of microbial flora 单位:个
| 类型 | 处理 | 重复1 | 重复2 | 重复3 | 平均值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 细菌 | 空白 | 27.4×106 | 30.8×106 | 27.3×106 | 28.5×106 |
| 施肥处理 | 40.7×106 | 38.0×106 | 42.8×106 | 40.5×106 | |
| 真菌 | 空白 | 4.11×106 | 5.03×106 | 4.91×106 | 4.68×106 |
| 施肥处理 | 12.32×106 | 14.03×106 | 12.55×106 | 12.97×106 |
| 类群 | 0~5 cm | >5~10 cm | >10~15 cm | 总计 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 膜翅目 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| 革翅目 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 蜘蛛目 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| 等翅目 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 鞘翅目 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 直翅目 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 总计 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 6 |
Table 4 Vertical distribution of soil macrofauna in blank treatment 单位:个
| 类群 | 0~5 cm | >5~10 cm | >10~15 cm | 总计 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 膜翅目 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| 革翅目 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 蜘蛛目 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| 等翅目 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 鞘翅目 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 直翅目 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 总计 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 6 |
| 类群 | 0~5 cm | >5~10 cm | >10~15 cm | 总计 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 膜翅目 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 12 |
| 革翅目 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 蜘蛛目 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 等翅目 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 鞘翅目 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 直翅目 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 弹尾目 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 双翅目 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 总计 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 15 |
Table 5 Vertical distribution of soil macrofauna treated with inorganic fertilizer 单位:个
| 类群 | 0~5 cm | >5~10 cm | >10~15 cm | 总计 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 膜翅目 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 12 |
| 革翅目 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 蜘蛛目 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 等翅目 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 鞘翅目 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 直翅目 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 弹尾目 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 双翅目 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 总计 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 15 |
| 类群 | 0~5 cm | >5~10 cm | >10~15 cm | 总计 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 膜翅目 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 11 |
| 革翅目 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 蜘蛛目 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 等翅目 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| 鞘翅目 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 直翅目 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 弹尾目 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 双翅目 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 总计 | 13 | 4 | 0 | 17 |
Table 6 Vertical distribution of soil macrofauna treated with pig manure commercial organic fertilizer 单位:个
| 类群 | 0~5 cm | >5~10 cm | >10~15 cm | 总计 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 膜翅目 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 11 |
| 革翅目 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 蜘蛛目 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 等翅目 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| 鞘翅目 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 直翅目 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 弹尾目 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 双翅目 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 总计 | 13 | 4 | 0 | 17 |
| 类群 | 0~5 cm | >5~10 cm | >10~15 cm | 总计 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 膜翅目 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 革翅目 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| 蜘蛛目 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 等翅目 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| 鞘翅目 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 直翅目 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| 弹尾目 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 双翅目 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| 总计 | 11 | 5 | 0 | 16 |
Table 7 Vertical distribution of soil macrofauna treated with sheep manure organic fertilizer 单位:个
| 类群 | 0~5 cm | >5~10 cm | >10~15 cm | 总计 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 膜翅目 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 革翅目 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| 蜘蛛目 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 等翅目 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| 鞘翅目 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 直翅目 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| 弹尾目 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 双翅目 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| 总计 | 11 | 5 | 0 | 16 |
| 类群 | 0~5 cm | >5~10 cm | >10~15 cm | 总计 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 膜翅目 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 14 |
| 革翅目 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 蜘蛛目 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 等翅目 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| 鞘翅目 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 直翅目 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 弹尾目 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 双翅目 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 总计 | 10 | 7 | 6 | 23 |
Table 8 Vertical distribution of soil macrofauna treated with mushroom residue 单位:个
| 类群 | 0~5 cm | >5~10 cm | >10~15 cm | 总计 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 膜翅目 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 14 |
| 革翅目 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 蜘蛛目 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 等翅目 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| 鞘翅目 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 直翅目 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 弹尾目 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 双翅目 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 总计 | 10 | 7 | 6 | 23 |
| 处理 | 类群数/个 | 个体数/个 | H | J |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | 6 | 1.32 | 0.83 |
| 2 | 4 | 15 | 0.72 | 0.51 |
| 3 | 7 | 17 | 1.86 | 0.96 |
| 4 | 7 | 16 | 1.84 | 0.95 |
| 5 | 6 | 23 | 1.24 | 0.69 |
Table 9 Biodiversity of soil macrofauna
| 处理 | 类群数/个 | 个体数/个 | H | J |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | 6 | 1.32 | 0.83 |
| 2 | 4 | 15 | 0.72 | 0.51 |
| 3 | 7 | 17 | 1.86 | 0.96 |
| 4 | 7 | 16 | 1.84 | 0.95 |
| 5 | 6 | 23 | 1.24 | 0.69 |
| [1] | 宋梦意, 王盛毅, 卫乐乐. 浙江省低丘缓坡土地资源开发利用研究:以工业建设用地为视角[J]. 河南教育学院学报(自然科学版), 2012, 21(3): 52-54. |
| [2] | 郑铭洁, 姜铭北, 章明奎, 等. 浙江省新垦耕地土壤熟化指标研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(10): 1834-1840. |
| [3] | 沈建国, 王忠, 李丹, 等. 余杭区新垦红壤耕地肥力特征及地力评价[J]. 土壤通报, 2018, 49(1): 55-60. |
| [4] | 刘国群, 章明奎, 严建立. 施用高量有机物料对新垦耕地红壤有机碳积累及性态的影响[J]. 安徽农业大学学报, 2021, 48(1): 101-107. |
| [5] | 沈建国, 楼玲, 邵小青, 等. 商品有机肥用量对新垦山地土壤肥力和蔬菜产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2019, 60(8): 1341-1344. |
| [6] | 陶晶, 邬奇峰, 石江, 等. 间作与接种丛枝菌根真菌对新垦山地玉米产量和土壤肥力的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(1): 115-123. |
| [7] | 董炜华, 李晓强, 宋扬. 土壤动物在土壤有机质形成中的作用[J]. 土壤, 2016, 48(2): 211-218. |
| [8] | AYRES E, STELTZER H, BERG S, et al. Soil biota accelerate decomposition in high-elevation forests by specializing in the breakdown of litter produced by the plant species above them[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2009(5): 901-912. |
| [9] | 魏巍, 许艳丽, 朱琳, 等. 长期施肥对黑土农田土壤微生物群落的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2013, 50(2):372-380. |
| [10] | MULDER C, BOIT A, BONKOWSKI M, et al. A belowground perspective on Dutch agroecosystems: how soil organisms interact to support ecosystem services[J]. Advances in Ecological Research, 2011,44:277-357. |
| [11] | 段文学, 张海燕, 解备涛, 等. 化肥和生物有机肥配施对鲜食型甘薯块根产量、品质及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2021, 27(11):1971-1980. |
| [12] | 齐振宇, 蔡盼, 蔡溧聪, 等. 化肥减施与有机肥替代对大蒜生长、产量及品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2021, 62(10): 1984-1987, 1990. |
| [13] | 张伟彬. 有机肥和化肥配施对小麦甘薯轮作土壤腐殖质结合形态及微生物群落结构的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2022, 50(17): 247-252. |
| [14] | 张卫兴, 朱玉祥, 吴勇. 施用有机肥基础上进行化肥减量在水稻甬优1540上的应用效果[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2021, 62(11): 2137-2138, 2140. |
| [1] | YU Yanfang, HU Yang, HE Shijie, XU Hongle, LEI Haixia, WANG Xiaoxiao, LI Huilong, ZHU Junde. Evaluation of control effects and crop safety of six herbicides and their combinations against weeds in direct-seeded rice fields [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(2): 430-436. |
| [2] | BAI Jianping, XU Weidong, LU Qiang, YAO Zhangliang. Field control effect of 40% prothioconazole·tebuconazole mixture on rice sheath blight [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(2): 437-439. |
| [3] | ZHOU Dan, ZHANG Jinpeng, LIU Mei, HU Dayan, YUAN Julin, ZHOU Zhijin. Study on the effect of embedded raceway aquaculture for Micropterus salmoides in rice fields [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(2): 475-482. |
| [4] | HUANG Qian. Control effects of different concentrations of two herbicides, single agent and compound agent on broad-leaved weeds in rapeseed field [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(1): 158-162. |
| [5] | YAN Jiaqi, HONG Leidong, FANG Yuxian, WANG Meiyun, HONG Chunlai, YAO Yanlai. Effects of replacing chemical fertilizers with organic fertilizers on soil properties, yield and quality of Ipomoea batatas [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(1): 57-61. |
| [6] | ZHOU Weiyu, KONG Guanghui, ZHANG Guanghai, ZHAO Gaokun, WU Yuping, LI Wei, LI Yongping, YAO Heng, WANG Na. Effects of different peanut organic fertilizers on the yield, quality, and soil physicochemical properties of Yunxue 38 [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(1): 72-78. |
| [7] | ZHANG Weiling, GE Furong, XU Jinggao, ZHENG Xuqian, YE Zhengqian. Study on the effect of soil conditioner combined with organic fertilizer on soil fertility and tea safety production in tea garden [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(9): 2069-2074. |
| [8] | LIU Pengfei, QIN Weiming, ZHANG Yizhi, WU Yuefu, WANG Hongli, QI He, LOU Binggan. Field efficacy trials of 22 fungicides against pear fire blight [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(9): 2152-2159. |
| [9] | NI Zheng, ZHU Yinchu, SUN Bingbing, YUN Tao, CHEN Liu, XU Hui, YE Weicheng, HUA Jionggang, ZHANG Cun. Evaluation of inactivation effect of commercial disinfectant on African swine fever virus based on model virus [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(8): 1944-1949. |
| [10] | FANG Qijun, CHEN Yinzai. Effect of organic fertilizer application of fish and shrimp scraps on rice production [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(7): 1539-1542. |
| [11] | YU Yining, LIN Cairong, FENG Feng, DING Yan, LAN Zhixin. Effect of TDZ on the proliferation and whitening effect of Spathiphyllum kochii [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(7): 1651-1656. |
| [12] | FANG Tiefei, YAO Xiaoming, ZHOU Yujie. Effect of different spray amounts of plant protection drones on the control effect of the Chilo suppressalis [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(7): 1663-1666. |
| [13] | GU Xiuping, MA Xiaohui. Study on the evaluation index system for the training effect of high-quality farmers under the perspective of common prosperity ——Taking the training of high-quality farmers in Zhejiang Province as an example [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(7): 1737-1744. |
| [14] | LIU Jinkui, ZHAO Meiying, ZHAO Mingjiang, HAN Rumei, WANG Chunfeng, FAN Zhanquan, JIAO Yongkang. Preliminary study on the effect of different nutrient ratios of compound microbial fertilizer containing PASP on the growth of Cucurbita pepo L. [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(6): 1404-1409. |
| [15] | JU Yawen, XU Peng, FU Yousheng, CAO Kaige. Research on the prevention and control of wheat scab by endophytic fungal fermentation broth [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(6): 1429-1433. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||