Effect of fertilization and transplanting methods on the growth and yield quality of cigar tobacco

doi:10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20250221

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to investigate the effects of different fertilization and transplanting methods on the growth and yield quality of cigar tobacco，and to find out the best cultivation method suitable for Suijiang County to improve the quality of tobacco leaves， tobacco variety Yunxue 39 was used as the test material，and a split-area design two-factor experiment was adopted，with a total of four treatments. Among them，A1 and A2 corresponded to the fertilizer application methods of circle application of basic fertilizer and strip application of basic fertilizer，respectively，and B1 and B2 corresponded to the transplanting methods of open furrow transplanting on flat ground and conventional ridge transplanting，respectively. The field growth，economic traits，chemical composition and other indicators were analyzed. The results showed that the growth periods of the different treatments were approximately the same. Treatment A1B2 had the best performance in agronomic and physical properties of tobacco leaves；treatment A2B1 had the highest yield，production value，and the content and ratio of conventional chemical components of dried tobacco leaves were the most harmonized，with a higher content of polyphenolic compounds. And compared with before transplantation，the soil organic matter，available potassium，hydrolyzable nitrogen，total potassium，total phosphorus，and available phosphorus contents in A2B1 treatment all showed significant （p<0.05） increases，with the largest amplitude observed. A1B1 treatment had the highest total amount of volatile aroma substances， while A1B2 was the lowest，and A1B2 had the greatest difference between the aroma components and the other three groups of treatments. Generally，the strip application of basal fertilizer and transplanting in open furrows on the flat ground were the best treatments under the experiment conditions.

Key words: fertilizer method, transplanting method, cigar, growth, yield and quality

CLC Number:

S572

WANG Qiuli, WANG Qingjiang, XU Yongbo. Effect of fertilization and transplanting methods on the growth and yield quality of cigar tobacco[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(6): 1443-1453.

Figures/Tables 13

References 27

[1]	胡婉蓉，李东亮. 国产雪茄烟叶关键生产技术研究进展［J］. 中国烟草学报，2025，31（1）：163-176.
	HU W R， LI D L. Research progress on key production technologies of domestic cigar tobacco leaves［J］. Acta Tabacaria Sinica，2025，31（1）：163-176.
[2]	刘利平，施友志，王剑，等. 不同有机肥对茄衣品种质量的影响［J］. 特产研究，2025，47（5）：43-47.
	LIU L P， SHI Y Z， WANG J，et al. Effects of different organic fertilizer treatments on the quality of cigar wrapper tobacco［J］. Special Wild Economic Animal and Plant Research，2025，47（5）：43-47.
[3]	周潇，何福英，禹紫云，等. 海拔高度对云产雪茄烟叶品质及微生物菌落结构的影响［J］. 中国农学通报，2024，40（34）：8-14.
	ZHOU X， HE F Y， YU Z Y，et al. Influence of altitude on quality and microbial community structure of Yunnan produced cigar tobacco leaves［J］. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin，2024，40（34）：8-14.
[4]	陈泳纬，吴永兵，袁华恩，等. 光照强度对雪茄烟叶光合特性、抗氧化特性及品质的影响［J］. 西南农业学报，2023，36（10）：2175-2182.
	CHEN Y W， WU Y B， YUAN H E，et al. Effect of light intensity on photosynthesis，antioxidation properties and quality of cigar leaves［J］. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences，2023，36（10）：2175-2182.
[5]	贺远，陈国瑀，王浩浩，等. 遮荫强度对海南雪茄烟生长及烟叶品质的影响［J］. 中国烟草科学，2024，45（4）：66-73.
	HE Y， CHEN G Y， WANG H H，et al. Effect of shading intensity on growth and leaf quality of Hainan cigar tobacco［J］. Chinese Tobacco Science，2024，45（4）：66-73.
[6]	王硕立，薛子钟，丁松爽，等. 遮荫栽培条件下茄衣烟田微气候特征及其对烟株生长发育和烟叶质量的影响［J］. 南方农业学报，2023，54（8）：2218-2227.
	WANG S L， XUE Z Z， DING S S，et al. Field microclimate characteristics and their effects on the growth and development and quality of wrapper tobacco leaf under shading cultivation［J］. Journal of Southern Agriculture，2023，54（8）：2218-2227.
[7]	赵松超，田培，刘博远，等. 采收成熟度对雪茄烟叶晾制过程酶促棕色化反应及品质的影响［J］. 中国农业科技导报，2020，22（5）：51-59.
	ZHAO S C， TIAN P， LIU B Y，et al. Effects of air curing of different maturity on enzymatic browning and quality of cigar tobacco leaves［J］. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology，2020，22（5）：51-59.
[8]	邢云飞，刘旭东，覃飚，等. 施氮水平对怀化雪茄烟生长、氮肥吸收利用及烟叶品质的影响［J］. 山东农业科学，2023，55（4）：97-101.
	XING Y F， LIU X D， QIN B，et al. Effects of nitrogen application level on growth，nitrogen absorption and utilization and tobacco quality of Huaihua cigar［J］. Shandong Agricultural Sciences，2023，55（4）：97-101.
[9]	袁新宇. 优化施氮对雪茄烟氮素利用及氮素平衡的影响［D］. 绵阳：西南科技大学，2023.
	YUAN X Y. Effect of optimized fertilization on nitrogen utilization and nitrogen balance in cigar tobacco［D］. Mianyang：Southwest University of Science and Technology，2023.
[10]	高华军，耿召良，贺远，等. 移栽方式和揭膜时期对海南省雪茄烟田杂草控制效果和烟叶产质量的影响［J］. 河南农业科学，2023，52（2）：47-56.
	GAO H J， GENG Z L， HE Y，et al. Effects of different transplanting methods and film uncovering periods on weed control in tobacco field，yield and quality of cigar leaves in Hainan Province［J］. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences，2023，52（2）：47-56.
[11]	邱志丹，郭金平，罗发健. 龙岩烟区不同施肥方式对烟叶产质量的影响［J］. 中国烟草科学，2004，25（3）：46-48.
	QIU Z D， GUO J P， LUO F J. Different fertilization methods on yields and quality of flue-cured tobacco in Longyan［J］. Chinese Tobacco Science，2004，25（3）：46-48.
[12]	吉书文，腾兆波. 烟草物理检测［M］. 郑州：河南科学出版社，1997.
[13]	YUN J， CUI C J， ZHANG S H，et al. Use of headspace GC/MS combined with chemometric analysis to identify the geographic origins of black tea［J］. Food Chemistry，2021，360：130033.
[14]	张华，王晨辉，李炜，等. 固相支持液液萃取-GC-MS结合化学计量学鉴别云南和津巴布韦烟草提取物［J］. 烟草科技，2022，55（12）：33-45.
	ZHANG H， WANG C H， LI W，et al. Identification of Yunnan and Zimbabwe tobacco extracts by solid-phase supported liquid-liquid extraction-GC-MS combined with chemometrics［J］. Tobacco Science & Technology，2022，55（12）：33-45.
[15]	杨夏孟，刘国顺，刘清华，等. 不同施肥方式对烤烟生长发育及品质的影响［J］. 山东农业科学，2012，44（7）：58-60.
	YANG X M， LIU G S， LIU Q H，et al. Effects of different fertilization ways on growth，development and quality of flue-cured tobacco［J］. Shandong Agricultural Sciences，2012，44（7）：58-60.
[16]	何厚民，罗军玲，唐经祥. 肥料形态及施肥方法对烤烟产质量的影响［J］. 安徽农业科学，2001，29（4）：538-541.
	HE H M， LUO J L， TANG J X. Effect of different fertilizers on tobacco yield and quality［J］. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences，2001，29（4）：538-541.
[17]	崔选忠. 农家肥不同施用方式对烟草生长及烤烟品质的影响［J］. 北京农业，2012（27）：57-58.
	CUI X Z. Farmyard manure application of different methods on tobacco growth and influence of flue-cured tobacco quality［J］. Beijing Agriculture，2012（27）：57-58.
[18]	王胱霖，夏翠花，詹琼梅，等. 昆明烟区田烟和地烟适宜起垄高度试验［J］. 农业科技通讯，2010（6）：60-64.
	WANG G L， XIA C H， ZHAN Q M，et al. Experiment on suitable ridge height of field tobacco and ground tobacco in Kunming tobacco-growing area［J］. Bulletin of Agricultural Science and Technology，2010（6）：60-64.
[19]	袁文彬，宗钊辉，谢晋，等. 高垄和膜下移栽对烤烟田间成熟度及产质量的影响［J］. 安徽农业科学，2018，46（27）：45-49.
	YUAN W B， ZONG Z H， XIE J，et al. Effects of high ridge and sub-membrane transplanting on maturity and yield of flue-cured tobacco［J］. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences，2018，46（27）：45-49.
[20]	王德权，王大海，王玉华，等. 灌溉起垄对烤烟上部叶片生长发育及品质的影响［J］. 农学学报，2024，14（10）：6-11.
	WANG D Q， WANG D H， WANG Y H，et al. Effects of irrigation ridging on growth，development and quality of upper leaves of flue-cured tobacco［J］. Journal of Agriculture，2024，14（10）：6-11.
[21]	项安楚，李克志，李群昌. 烤烟起垄栽培效果好［J］. 烟草科技，1987，20（2）：32-33.
	XIANG A C， LI K Z， LI Q C. The ridging cultivation effect of flue-cured tobacco is good［J］. Tobacco Science & Technology，1987，20（2）：32-33.
[22]	辉树光，彭坚强，江皓，等. 不同施肥方式对早植烟生长发育的影响［J］. 热带农业科学，2014，34（12）：14-17.
	HUI S G， PENG J Q， JIANG H，et al. Effects of different fertilization ways on growth and development of early planting flue-cured tobacco［J］. Chinese Journal of Tropical Agriculture，2014，34（12）：14-17.
[23]	陈亚茹，王均宜，赵正雄，等. 基肥施用方式对烤烟钾素累积及产质量的影响［J］. 土壤与作物，2021，10（4）：422-429.
	CHEN Y R， WANG J Y， ZHAO Z X，et al. Effects of basal fertilizer placement on potassium accumulation，yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco［J］. Soils and Crops，2021，10（4）：422-429.
[24]	李旭华，张海伟，叶为民，等. 基肥施用方式对烤烟根系生长及根际微生态环境的影响［J］. 西南农业学报，2017，30（10）：2284-2289.
	LI X H， ZHANG H W， YE W M，et al. Effects of different basal-dressing application methods on flue-cured root growth and rhizosphere microenvironment［J］. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences，2017，30（10）：2284-2289.
[25]	李海龙，赵正雄，于良君，等. 不同施肥方式对烤烟生长发育及产质量的影响［J］. 安徽农业科学，2013，41（17）：7508-7510.
	LI H L， ZHAO Z X， YU L J，et al. Effects of different fertilization methods on growth，yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco［J］. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences，2013，41（17）：7508-7510.
[26]	王寒，李谨成，黄瑞寅，等. 垄高与培土高度对烤烟根系生长和烟碱积累的影响［J］. 作物研究，2024，38（5）：372-378.
	WANG H， LI J C， HUANG R Y，et al. Effects of ridging height and hilling height on root growth of flue-cured tobacco and accumulation of nicotine［J］. Crop Research，2024，38（5）：372-378.
[27]	黄锡春，夏天，丁德盛，等. 不同基肥条施深度对烤烟生长及烟叶产质量的影响［J］. 农业与技术，2024，44（22）：31-35.
	HUANG X C， XIA T， DING D S，et al. Effects of different basal dressing depths on the growth，yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco［J］. Agriculture and Technology，2024，44（22）：31-35.

处理	移栽期（月-日）	团棵期（月-日）	旺长期（月-日）	现蕾期（月-日）	下部叶始采收期（月-日）	上部叶终采收期（月-日）	大田生育期/d
A1B1	04-20	05-20	06-01	06-10	06-28	07-24	95
A1B2	04-20	05-20	06-01	06-14	06-28	07-24	95
A2B1	04-20	05-20	06-01	06-11	06-28	07-24	95
A2B2	04-20	05-20	06-01	06-13	06-28	07-24	95

处理	移栽期（月-日）	团棵期（月-日）	旺长期（月-日）	现蕾期（月-日）	下部叶始采收期（月-日）	上部叶终采收期（月-日）	大田生育期/d
A1B1	04-20	05-20	06-01	06-10	06-28	07-24	95
A1B2	04-20	05-20	06-01	06-14	06-28	07-24	95
A2B1	04-20	05-20	06-01	06-11	06-28	07-24	95
A2B2	04-20	05-20	06-01	06-13	06-28	07-24	95

处理	单株叶片数	株高/cm	节距/cm	茎围/cm	腰叶长/cm	腰叶宽/cm
A1B1	15.65±0.67 b	152.51±5.33 c	9.76±0.56 ab	7.57±0.14 b	56.71±1.69 bc	33.62±1.53 c
A1B2	15.95±0.83 ab	158.67±4.08 a	9.67±0.49 ab	7.68±0.12 a	58.52±2.17 a	34.57±2.00 a
A2B1	15.15±1.09 c	151.84±4.56 c	10.07±0.73 a	7.57±0.15 b	56.34±1.38 c	33.53±1.58 d
A2B2	16.15±0.87 a	155.37±3.35 b	9.63±0.23 b	7.62±0.15 ab	57.78±2.18 ab	34.21±1.62 b

处理	单株叶片数	株高/cm	节距/cm	茎围/cm	腰叶长/cm	腰叶宽/cm
A1B1	15.65±0.67 b	152.51±5.33 c	9.76±0.56 ab	7.57±0.14 b	56.71±1.69 bc	33.62±1.53 c
A1B2	15.95±0.83 ab	158.67±4.08 a	9.67±0.49 ab	7.68±0.12 a	58.52±2.17 a	34.57±2.00 a
A2B1	15.15±1.09 c	151.84±4.56 c	10.07±0.73 a	7.57±0.15 b	56.34±1.38 c	33.53±1.58 d
A2B2	16.15±0.87 a	155.37±3.35 b	9.63±0.23 b	7.62±0.15 ab	57.78±2.18 ab	34.21±1.62 b

处理	拉力/N	平衡含水率/%	叶片厚度/mm	单叶重/g	含梗率/%	优叶率/%
A1B1	1.63±0.01 b	15.92±0.03 a	0.44±0.02 d	4.18±0.28 d	28.32±0.83 b	50.47±0.53 b
A1B2	2.48±0.01 a	15.56±0.03 b	0.52±0.05 b	5.46±0.32 a	26.80±0.48 c	48.93±1.00 c
A2B1	1.32±0.01 d	14.30±0.04 c	0.48±0.04 c	4.87±0.11 c	26.22±0.18 d	57.18±0.58 a
A2B2	1.53±0.01 c	14.04±0.04 d	0.62±0.06 a	5.27±0.25 b	29.22±0.35 a	42.16±0.62 d