Application of plant immune elicitors in the green prevention and control of strawberries

doi:10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20250122

Abstract

Abstract:

This research was carried out to ensure the quality and safety of strawberry，explore new ways of green prevention and control in strawberry cultivation，improve the yield and quality of strawberry，and promote the efficient and healthy development of the strawberry industry. In this experiment， strawberry variety Yuexiu were used as the test materials，and two plant immune elicitors，Shouchengwang and Ainuosen，were introduced. By comparing the application of plant immune elicitors with that of conventional fertilizers，the growth indicators，fruit characteristics of strawberries，as well as their different impacts on strawberry disease resistance，were analyzed. The experimental results showed that，compared with conventional fertilization，the two plant immune elicitors could，to a certain extent，promote growth，improve taste and increase yield. Their performance in strawberry pest and disease resistance was similar to that of conventional fertilization. When the two plant immune elicitors were compared，Shouchengwang was more effective in increasing yield，while Ainuosen was more effective in improving taste. This proves that the introduction of plant immune elicitors in the strawberry cultivation process，combined with the reduction of conventional fertilizers and the adoption of green prevention and control technologies，that is，the production mode of "fertilizer reduction + plant immune elicitor + green prevention and control technologies（traps，color plates，predatory mites，etc.）" can，to a certain extent，achieve the effects of fertilizer reduction，environmental friendliness，yield increase and quality improvement，as well as green safety.

Key words: plant immune elicitor, green prevention and control, strawberry

CLC Number:

S567.23⁺9

ZHOU Jinghan. Application of plant immune elicitors in the green prevention and control of strawberries[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(6): 1535-1538.

Figures/Tables 3

References 10

[1]	廖益民，胡美华. 浙江省草莓产业现状、存在问题与发展对策［J］. 浙江农业科学，2018，59（5）：682-684.
	LIAO Y M， HU M H. Current situation，existing problems，and development strategies of the strawberry industry in Zhejiang Province［J］. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences，2018，59（5）：682-684.
[2]	周佳燕，杨新琴，胡美华，等. 浙江省2017年草莓生产发展情况调研［J］. 长江蔬菜，2019（2）：72-75.
	ZHOU J Y， YANG X Q， HU M H，et al. Survey on the development of strawberry production in Zhejiang province in 2017［J］. Journal of Changjiang Vegetables，2019（2）：72-75.
[3]	张钰波，张成义，李思，等. 6个草莓新品种在宁波市奉化区大棚种植表现初报［J］. 浙江农业科学，2024，65（8）：1781-1785.
	ZHANG Y B， ZHANG C Y， LI S，et al. A preliminary report on the performance of six new strawberry varieties grown in greenhouses in Fenghua District，Ningbo City，Zhejiang Province［J］. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences，2024，65（8）：1781-1785.
[4]	忻雅，余红，肖文斐，等. 免疫诱导剂在草莓病虫害绿色防控技术中的应用［J］. 浙江农业科学，2020，61（3）：437-439.
	XIN Y， YU H， XIAO W F，et al. Application of immune inducers in green control techniques for strawberry diseases and pests［J］. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences，2020，61（3）：437-439.
[5]	赵继红，孙淑君，李建中. 植物诱导抗病性与诱抗剂研究进展［J］. 农药市场信息，2003（20）：11-12.
	ZHAO J H， SUN S J， LI J Z. Research progress on plant induced disease resistance and inducers［J］. Pesticide Market News，2003（20）：11-12.
[6]	陈敏洁，杨超超，汪晓菲，等. 免疫诱抗剂对浙贝母生长与抗病的影响［J］. 浙江农业科学，2022，63（12）：2865-2868.
	CHEN M J， YANG C C， WANG X F，et al. Effect of immune elicitors on the growth and disease resistance of Fritillaria thunbergii ［J］. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences，2022，63（12）：2865-2868.
[7]	邱德文. 植物免疫诱抗剂的研究进展与应用前景［J］. 2014（1）：39-45.
	QIU D W. Research progress and application prospects of plant immune elicitors［J］. 2014（1）：39-45.
[8]	丁娟，孙学鹏，俞浙萍，等. 不同免疫诱导剂对杨梅凋萎病抗性的影响［J］. 浙江农业科学，2024（6）：1424-1428.
	DING J， SUN X P， YU Z P，et al. Effects of different resistance inducers on the resistance of Chinese bayberry twig blight disease［J］. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences，2024（6）：1424-1428.
[9]	沈国正，刘辉，肖文斐，等. 免疫诱抗剂保康灵1号对葡萄促生长与抗病的效应［J］. 浙江农业科学，2016，57（8）：1193-1196.
	SHEN G Z， LIU H， XIAO W F，et al. Effect of immune elicitor Baokangling No. 1 on the growth promotion and disease resistance of grapevine［J］. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences，2016，57（8）：1193-1196.
[10]	王晓丹，阮松林，肖文斐，等. 免疫诱抗剂对水稻秧苗生长与产量形成的影响［J］. 浙江农业科学，2019，60（11）：1999-2001.
	WANG X D， RUAN S L， XIAO W F，et al. Effect of immune elicitor on the growth and yield formation of rice seedlings［J］. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences，2019，60（11）：1999-2001.

处理	叶柄长	叶长	叶宽	株高	冠幅
T1（爱诺森组）	15.82±1.24 a	8.53±0.79 a	8.14±0.41 a	20.0±1.41 a	32.3±2.83 b
T2（收成王组）	16.00±1.15 a	8.96±0.98 a	8.14±0.92 a	19.7±2.45 a	34.3±2.16 a
CK（常规施肥组）	14.74±0.80 b	8.25±0.84 a	8.13±0.65 a	19.1±3.12 a	30.8±3.33 b

处理	叶柄长	叶长	叶宽	株高	冠幅
T1（爱诺森组）	15.82±1.24 a	8.53±0.79 a	8.14±0.41 a	20.0±1.41 a	32.3±2.83 b
T2（收成王组）	16.00±1.15 a	8.96±0.98 a	8.14±0.92 a	19.7±2.45 a	34.3±2.16 a
CK（常规施肥组）	14.74±0.80 b	8.25±0.84 a	8.13±0.65 a	19.1±3.12 a	30.8±3.33 b

处理	单果重/g	可溶性糖含量/%	667 m²产量/kg
T1（爱诺森组）	32.9±3.24 a	14.67±1.74 a	1 900
T2（收成王组）	33.5±3.02 a	13.85±0.68 ab	2 000
CK（常规施肥组）	30.6±2.71 b	13.34±1.89 b	1 700

处理	单果重/g	可溶性糖含量/%	667 m²产量/kg
T1（爱诺森组）	32.9±3.24 a	14.67±1.74 a	1 900
T2（收成王组）	33.5±3.02 a	13.85±0.68 ab	2 000
CK（常规施肥组）	30.6±2.71 b	13.34±1.89 b	1 700

处理	每叶螨虫密度	受害叶面积占比/%	灰霉病发病率/%	灰霉病病情指数	白粉病发病率/%	白粉病病情指数
T1（爱诺森组）	1.1	5.3	0	0	5.0	0.30
T2（收成王组）	0.9	5.0	1.0	0.10	6.0	0.33
CK（常规施肥组）	1.2	5.0	0	0	4.0	0.27