Effects of different formula fertilization on physicochemical properties and yield of lotus root soil and surface water

doi:10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20230365

Abstract

Abstract:

In view of the potential non-point source pollution of lotus pond fertilizer, the screening of green and efficient lotus root functional fertilizer and fertilizer quota system were studied. The results showed that the soil pH value, organic carbon and total nitrogen content of the soil were significantly increased when the total nutrient was kept at 795 kg·hm^-2 and carbon-based fertilizer was applied, but the total phosphorus and total potassium were not significantly increased. In addition to total phosphorus, the physicochemical indexes of surface water decreased significantly with the extension of growth cycle, and the values of physicochemical indexes were the highest at seedling stage. In the treatment of replacing conventional fertilization with 20% carbon-based organic fertilizer, the number of roots, total output of lotus root and weight of single root were significantly increased by 20.2%, 31.2% and 9.16%, respectively. In general, the maximum fertilization limit of lotus root is set as 795 kg·hm^-2 of total nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium and 375 kg·hm^-2 of pure nitrogen, which is scientific, reasonable and feasible, and can fully meet the needs of green and efficient production of lotus root.

Key words: lotus root, formulated fertilizer, carbon-based fertilizer, non-point source pollution, yield

CLC Number:

S645.1
S153

HUANG Xizhi, WANG Zhaoli, YUAN Xin, FENG Minfang, ZHU Yan, TANG Hongli, WANG Xiaoxuan. Effects of different formula fertilization on physicochemical properties and yield of lotus root soil and surface water[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(10): 2266-2272.

Figures/Tables 13

Table 1 The physical and chemical properties of lotus pond sediment samples

处理	pH值	有机碳含量/ (g·kg^-1)	全氮含量/ (g·kg^-1)	全磷含量/ (g·kg^-1)	全钾含量/ (g·kg^-1)
T1	5.52	20.7	2.08	0.96	7.61
T2	5.75	20.6	2.04	0.89	16.17
T3	5.46	22.0	2.12	1.04	20.12
T4	5.86	21.7	2.12	1.08	16.20
T5	5.60	22.8	2.54	0.92	6.55
T6	5.78	27.0	2.91	1.21	13.72
T7	6.16	27.8	2.67	1.20	16.38

Table 2 The physical and chemical properties of lotus field water samples

处理	pH值	电导率/ (μS·cm^-1)	总氮含量/ (mg·L^-1)	总磷含量/ (mg·L^-1)	总钾含量/ (mg·L^-1)
T1	7.33	515.5	8.42	0.09	13.8
T2	7.23	559.5	13.19	0.09	16.0
T3	7.10	429.0	9.02	0.14	11.7
T4	7.55	514.0	8.76	0.08	12.6
T5	7.62	445.5	8.88	0.12	14.5
T6	7.36	509.0	8.91	0.18	12.9
T7	7.28	464.5	5.81	0.16	14.9

Fig.1 The change in soil pH value of lotus plants at different growth stages

Fig.2 The change in soil organic carbon content of lotus plants at different growth stages

Fig.3 The change in soil total nitrogen content of lotus plants at different growth stages

Fig.4 The change in soil total phosphorus content of lotus plants at different growth stages

Fig.5 The change in soil total potassium content of lotus plants at different growth stages

Fig.6 The change in surface water pH value of lotus plants at different growth stages

Fig.7 The change in surface water conductivity of lotus plants at different growth stages

Fig.8 The change in surface water total nitrogen content of lotus plants at different growth stages

Fig.9 The change in surface water total phosphorus content of lotus plants at different growth stages

Fig.10 The change in surface water total potassium content of lotus plants at different growth stages

Table 3 The number and yield of lotus roots

处理	结藕根数	莲藕总产量/kg	单根藕质量/kg
T1	143	126.8	0.886
T2	104	81.4	0.783
T3	110	86.5	0.786
T4	101	80.4	0.796
T5	136	115.6	0.850
T6	69	33.4	0.484
T7	125	106.8	0.854

References 12

[1]	鲍锐, 孔令明, 普建文, 等. 施用不同配比化肥与有机肥对莲藕植物学性状、产量及品质的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2019, 32(4): 911-915.
[2]	柯卫东, 黄新芳, 李建洪, 等. 我国水生蔬菜科研与生产发展概况[J]. 长江蔬菜, 2015(14): 33-37.
[3]	李通, 佟静, 王丽萍, 等. 不同缓释肥对莲藕光合特性、产量及品质的影响[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2021, 34(5): 76-81.
[4]	刘玉学, 陈立天, 戴美松, 等. 浙江省梨主产区梨园土壤理化性质及重金属状况调查分析[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2022, 63(11): 2587-2591, 2594.
[5]	鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 2000.
[6]	王晓港. 生物质炭基肥对旱区土壤性状及玉米生长的影响[D]. 银川: 宁夏大学, 2022.
[7]	范声浓, 王烁衡, 于良君, 等. 生物炭对杧果根系生长、土壤养分和微生物群落的影响[J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2022, 37(4): 692-702.
[8]	吕永强, 郑铭洁, 吴家森, 等. 不同减量氮肥配施紫云英对田面水氮磷流失及水稻生长的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022, 36(6): 148-155.
[9]	张成兰, 刘春增, 吕玉虎, 等. 减量化肥配施不同量紫云英对土壤磷素形态及水稻产量的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2020(1): 100-106.
[10]	焦婷. 增施有机肥对莲藕品质的影响: 以安徽省颍上县为例[J]. 种子科技, 2023, 41(10): 22-24.
[11]	丁嘉仪, 张子怡, 邓康明, 等. 不同缓释氮肥施用量对莲藕产量和淀粉品质的影响[J]. 植物生理学报, 2023, 59(9): 1793-1802.
[12]	傅志强, 刘祯, 马春花, 等. 生物炭及炭基肥对土壤质量与植物生长的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(7): 1634-1645.

[1]	WANG Jianjun, SONG Jian, CUI Yongtao, FAN Honghuan, TANG Liqun. Breeding and cultivation techniques of super-high yield, high-quality and early-maturity indica-japonica hybrid rice Zheyou 915 [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(9): 2014-2018.
[2]	XIE Xiaocong, XU Xinxin, WANG Huirong, SHI Liyun, CHEN Kai, CHEN Jianmin, CAO Xuexian. Effect of different proportions of organic fertilizer nitrogen replacing inorganic nitrogen fertilizer on rice growth and fertilizer efficiency [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(9): 2028-2032.
[3]	HE Yuehua, DENG Fei, ZHOU Jianxia, LU Aiguo, CHEN Liping, DAI Rongfu, WANG Kongjian. Comparative analysis on direct seeding cultivation of 20 early rice varieties in Jinhua [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(9): 2037-2041.
[4]	SONG Youliang, ZHOU Xingyuan, ZHANG Kan. Screening of suitable regenerative rice varieties and their supporting cultivation technology in Shaoxing [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(9): 2042-2045.
[5]	LU Yanhua, SHENG Dingjian, ZHOU Jianwu, YE Wangping, YANG Huanqing, TAO Kaizhan, LIU Yongan. Comparison of agronomic traits and yield of different waxy wheat lines in Yongjia County [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(9): 2061-2063.
[6]	ZHANG Weiling, GE Furong, XU Jinggao, ZHENG Xuqian, YE Zhengqian. Study on the effect of soil conditioner combined with organic fertilizer on soil fertility and tea safety production in tea garden [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(9): 2069-2074.
[7]	YANG Jianqiang, GAO Jiarui, LIU Chaochao, WANG Qiaoling. Effects of different dosages of soil conditioner on the growth of Puccinellia tenuiflora and soil nutrients [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(9): 2138-2142.
[8]	ZHENG Bigu, LI Zhongyuan, ZHENG Guoming, WANG Hao, SHEN Bo, LU Yunfeng. Effects of different cultivation modes on the yield and nutritional components of Abelmoschus sagittifolius [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(8): 1755-1758.
[9]	SHEN Fangqin, ZHANG Weijiang. Comparison and analysis evaluation of rice varieties [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(8): 1856-1859.
[10]	LI Mengni, WU Lujie, YE Zhengqian. Effects of zinc fertilizer spraying on rice growth and zinc content in rice under the condition of chemical fertilizer reduction [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(8): 1873-1878.
[11]	DING Li, ZHANG Lin, DU Guanghui, ZHANG Lixia, SHI Pengfei, NIE Liangpeng, LING Jingwei, PAN Ziliang, LYU Yuhu. Selection of summer green manure varieties and winter wheat rotation in southern Henan [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(8): 1957-1962.
[12]	PAN Xinrui, WANG Xian, HU Zhongze, YI Zhengwei, YANG Daliu. Comparison of yield and composition factors of different japonica rice varieties under rice-shrimp co-cultivation mode [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(7): 1543-1546.
[13]	ZHANG Wenyong, CHEN Guanghui, CHEN Zhaoming. Effects of different fertilization patterns on yield and soil fertility of double cropping rice [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(7): 1547-1550.
[14]	XU Xinyan. Effect of chemical regulators on plant growth and yield of maize variety Luning 184 for grain and forage [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(7): 1559-1562.
[15]	ZHANG Xiaomeng, XU Jie, LIU Guiliang, MIAO Wentao. Effects of various new fungicides on damage control and economic traits of rice [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(7): 1667-1670.