Effects of tobacco-sweet potato intercropping on rhizosphere microbial diversity

doi:10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20240100

Abstract

Abstract:

To investigate the effects of intercropping sweet potato with tobacco on the tobacco rhizosphere soil microbial diversity and to provide a theoretical basis for the promotion of this cropping pattern, Illumina MiSeq high-throughput sequencing technology was employed to compare the microbial diversity and community composition in the tobacco rhizosphere soil under two treatments: tobacco-sweet potato intercropping and tobacco monoculture. The results showed that, compared with tobacco monoculture, intercropping with sweet potato reduced the α-diversity of the fungal community in the rhizosphere soil. At the bacterial phylum level, the relative abundances of Acidobacteriota and Firmicutes increased by 3.29 and 1.82 percentage points, respectively, under intercropping, while those of Actinobacteriota, Proteobacteria, and Chloroflexi decreased by 2.70, 1.16, and 1.82 percentage points, respectively. At the fungal phylum level, the relative abundances of Mortierellomycota, Basidiomycota, and unclassified_k_Fungi increased by 3.01, 1.94, and 0.91 percentage points, respectively, whereas that of Ascomycota decreased by 5.92 percentage points. At the bacterial genus level, the relative abundances of norank_f_Vicinamibacteraceae, norank_f_norank_o_Vicinamibacterales, Bacillus, RB41, and norank_f_norank_o_Gaiellales increased by 0.67, 0.86, 1.47, 0.67, and 0.15 percentage points, respectively, under intercropping. In contrast, the relative abundances of norank_f_JG30-KF-CM45, norank_f_67-14, norank_f_Gemmatimonadaceae, norank_f_norank_o_ norank_c_KD4-96, Blastococcus, Streptomyces, and Solirubrobacter decreased by 0.43, 0.01, 0.37, 0.21, 0.31, 0.25, and 0.15 percentage points, respectively. Correlation analysis indicated that soil pH value significantly influenced the rhizosphere microbial community, exerting notable effects on Firmicutes, Chloroflexi, Ascomycota, and Mortierellomycota. This study provides a theoretical foundation for the promotion and application of the tobacco-sweet potato intercropping pattern.

Key words: high-throughput sequencing, tobacco-sweet potato intercropping, rhizosphere soil, tobacco, microbial diversity

CLC Number:

S572

HUANG Haixia, HUANG Kunpeng, YANG Zaijun, CAO Kexin, PAN Hengde, WEI Xueping, LU Fuyong, LI Junlin, LUO Qinzhan. Effects of tobacco-sweet potato intercropping on rhizosphere microbial diversity[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(12): 2901-2909.

Figures/Tables 6

Table 1 Soil bacterial and fungal richness and diversity index under different treatments

分类	处理	Shannon指数	Simpson指数	Ace指数	Chao1指数	覆盖范围/%
细菌	T	6.93±0.05 a	0.002 4±0.000 1 a	4 895.38±193.88 a	4 907.71±219.22 a	96.61
	CK	6.95±0.06 a	0.002 4±0.000 2 a	5 000.40±259.13 a	4 958.98±236.00 a	96.56
真菌	T	4.58±0.16 a	0.026 0±0.010 0 a	779.41±39.25 b	787.72±36.23 b	99.77
	CK	4.64±0.30 a	0.029 8±0.020 0 a	1 043.02±155.05 a	1 047.47±164.17 a	99.59

Fig.1 The operational taxonomic unit(OTU) number of bacteria (left) and fungi (right)

Fig.2 Relative abundance of rhizosphere soil bacteria (left) and fungi (right) at phylum level under different treatments

Fig.3 Relative abundance of rhizosphere soil bacteria (left) and fungi (right) in different treatments at the genus level

Fig.4 Principle coordinates analyssi (PCoA) and non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) analysis of rhizosphere soil bacteria (left) and fungi (right)

Fig.5 Correlation between physical and chemical properties of rhizosphere soil and relative abundance of bacteria (left) and fungi (right)

References 56

[1]	阳显斌, 李廷轩, 张锡洲, 等. 烟蒜轮作与套作对土壤微生物类群数量的影响[J]. 土壤, 2016, 48(4): 698-704.
[2]	刘巧真, 郭芳阳, 吴照辉, 等. 烤烟连作土壤障碍因子及防治措施[J]. 中国农学通报, 2012, 28(10): 87-90.
[3]	姚小东, 李孝刚, 丁昌峰, 等. 连作和轮作模式下花生土壤微生物群落不同微域分布特征[J]. 土壤学报, 2019, 56(4): 975-985.
[4]	凌爱芬, 肖丽霞, 孙延国, 等. 轮间套作种植模式消除烟草连作障碍的机理研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2022, 50(24): 1-4.
[5]	ODUM E P. 生态学基础[M]. 孙儒泳,译. 北京: 人民教育出版社, 1981: 56-81.
[6]	贾健, 朱金峰, 杜修智, 等. 不同种植模式对烤烟根际土壤微生物、土壤养分和烟叶质量的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2016, 29(10): 2300-2306.
[7]	张开虹, 桑维钧, 何世芳, 等. 不同作物间作对烤烟根际土壤细菌群落组成及功能的影响[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2020, 48(4): 80-86.
[8]	鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
[9]	常昊. 垄畦类型与规格对设施栽培番茄生长及产量的影响[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2022.
[10]	王彩云, 武春成, 曹霞, 等. 生物炭对温室黄瓜不同连作年限土壤养分和微生物群落多样性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(4): 1359-1366.
[11]	何晓冰, 黄昆鹏, 李俊营, 等. 烟草镰刀菌根腐病根际土壤微生物群落结构及多样性[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2025, 66(2):411-420.
[12]	许艺, 李红, 巩雪峰, 等. 基于高通量测序分析辣椒/玉米套作对辣椒根际土壤细菌多样性的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2022, 35(4): 772-779.
[13]	黄昆鹏, 董昆乐, 李芳芳, 等. 烟草抗病嫁接对根际土壤微生物多样性的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2023, 51(20): 239-247.
[14]	陈尧, 郑华, 石俊雄, 等. 施用化肥和菜籽粕对烤烟根际微生物的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2012, 49(1): 198-203.
[15]	徐阳春, 沈其荣, 冉炜. 长期免耕与施用有机肥对土壤微生物生物量碳、氮、磷的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2002, 39(1): 83-90.
[16]	魏甲彬, 李有清. 生物炭添加对根际土壤微生物群落影响研究进展[J]. 湖南生态科学学报, 2023, 10(2): 101-108.
[17]	贾方方, 许跃奇, 阎海涛, 等. 烟草镰刀菌根腐病(Fusarium spp.)拮抗菌L210的鉴定及生防潜力评价[J]. 烟草科技, 2023, 56(10): 40-48.
[18]	吴寿明, 高正锋, 白茂军, 等. 烟草黑胫病不同发病程度与根际微生物间的响应关系[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2023(7): 223-231.
[19]	吴小军, 汪汉成, 孙美丽, 等. 烟草角斑病叶际微生物群落结构与多样性分析[J]. 烟草科技, 2023, 56(10): 1-10.
[20]	龚姝. 烟草青枯病防治研究进展[J]. 热带农业科技, 2023, 46(3): 68-72.
[21]	尹睿, 张华勇, 黄锦法, 等. 保护地菜田与稻麦轮作田土壤微生物学特征的比较[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2004, 10(1): 57-62.
[22]	盘莫谊, 张杨珠, 肖嫩群, 等. 烟草连作对旱地土壤微生物及酶活性的影响[J]. 世界科技研究与发展, 2008, 30(3): 295-297.
[23]	刘岳飞. 基于传统和高通量测序技术研究地膜对辣椒土壤特性及微生物多样性的影响[D]. 南宁: 广西大学, 2018.
[24]	孙建平, 刘雅辉, 左永梅, 等. 盐地碱蓬根际土壤细菌群落结构及其功能[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2020, 28(10): 1618-1629.
[25]	PANKRATOV T A, IVANOVA A O, DEDYSH S N, et al. Bacterial populations and environmental factors controlling cellulose degradation in an acidic sphagnum peat[J]. Environmental Microbiology, 2011, 13(7): 1800-1814.
[26]	李益. 森林土壤磷循环功能基因变化特征及其影响因素[D]. 西安: 西北大学, 2022.
[27]	赵晶晶, 杨明, 李宪臻, 等. 一个纤维素降解菌群的多样性分析[J]. 大连工业大学学报, 2022, 41(4): 235-241.
[28]	徐丹阳, 杨鹏, 杨章明, 等. 生物农药防治烟草黑胫病及烟草根黑腐病研究进展[J]. 农业与技术, 2022, 42(8): 9-12.
[29]	安依凡, 杨照, 林波, 等. 黑胫病烟株真菌分离鉴定与芽孢杆菌拮抗比较[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2023(6): 45-49.
[30]	罗云艳, 安航, 何佶弦, 等. 烟草根黑腐病根际拮抗菌的筛选、鉴定及其促生防病效果[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2021, 42(3): 57-64.
[31]	白雪花, 陈晓蓉, 陈新范, 等. 连作与非连作苎麻根际微生物的多样性研究[J]. 中国麻业科学, 2021, 43(5): 222-230.
[32]	KERNEY K R, SCHUERGER A C. Survival of Bacillus subtilis endospores on ultraviolet-irradiated rover wheels and Mars regolith under simulated Martian conditions[J]. Astrobiology, 2011, 11(5): 477-485.
[33]	安依凡, 韩猛, 姚峰, 等. 贝莱斯芽孢杆菌RJW-5-5对烟草赤星病菌的拮抗研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2021, 49(6): 130-133.
[34]	沈会芳, 杨祁云, 张景欣, 等. 贝莱斯芽孢杆菌GDND-2对烟草镰孢根腐病菌生长发育的影响[J]. 微生物学通报, 2023, 50(7): 2876-2891.
[35]	刘志培, 刘双江. 硝化作用微生物的分子生物学研究进展[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2004, 10(4): 521-525.
[36]	王峰, 陈玉真, 尤志明, 等. 不同施氮量对两种茶园土壤硝化作用和pH值的影响[J]. 茶叶科学, 2015, 35(1): 82-90.
[37]	李平, 郎漫, 李煜姗, 等. 不同施肥处理对黑土硝化作用和矿化作用的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2015, 34(7): 1326-1332.
[38]	史文燕, 张健. 硝化杆菌(Nitrobacte)和硝化螺菌(Nitrospira)在脱氮系统中的研究进展[J]. 应用化工, 2020, 49(10): 2581-2585.
[39]	WAGG C, DUDENHÖFFER J H, WIDMER F, et al. Linking diversity, synchrony and stability in soil microbial communities[J]. Functional Ecology, 2018, 32(5): 1280-1292.
[40]	鲜文东, 张潇橦, 李文均. 绿弯菌的研究现状及展望[J]. 微生物学报, 2020, 60(9): 1801-1820.
[41]	BEIMFORDE C, FELDBERG K, NYLINDER S, et al. Estimating the Phanerozoic history of the Ascomycota lineages: Combining fossil and molecular data[J]. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 2014, 78: 386-398.
[42]	YELLE D J, RALPH J, LU F C, et al. Evidence for cleavage of lignin by a brown rot basidiomycete[J]. Environmental Microbiology, 2008, 10(7): 1844-1849.
[43]	ROSAS-MEDINA M, MACIÁ-VICENTE J G, PIEPENBRING M. Diversity of fungi in soils with different degrees of degradation in Germany and Panama[J]. Mycobiology, 2020, 48(1): 20-28.
[44]	林春英, 李希来, 张玉欣, 等. 黄河源区高寒沼泽湿地土壤微生物群落结构对不同退化的响应[J]. 环境科学, 2021, 42(8): 3971-3984.
[45]	宁琪, 陈林, 李芳, 等. 被孢霉对土壤养分有效性和秸秆降解的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2022, 59(1): 206-217.
[46]	TAMAYO-VÉLEZ Á, OSORIO N W. Soil fertility improvement by litter decomposition and inoculation with the fungus Mortierella sp. in avocado plantations of Colombia[J]. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 2018, 49(2): 139-147.
[47]	徐惠昌, 尤龙辉, 游惠明, 等. 不同土壤管理模式对锥栗园土壤真菌群组成的影响[J]. 果树学报, 2021, 38(11): 1942-1955.
[48]	章行远, 吴奇飞, 卯婷婷, 等. 辣椒枯萎病拮抗木霉菌的筛选及鉴定[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2022, 50(6): 24-30, 2.
[49]	易龙, 邱妙文, 陈永明, 等. 烟草黑胫病的生物防治研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017, 33(25): 146-151.
[50]	饶清琳, 钱发聪, 张廷金, 等. 哈茨木霉菌LTR-2对烟草黑胫病的田间防治效果[J]. 昆明学院学报, 2021, 43(3): 16-19.
[51]	张良, 刘好宝, 顾金刚, 等. 长柄木霉和泾阳链霉菌复配对烟苗生长及其抗病性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24(10): 2961-2969.
[52]	徐全智. 宁夏枸杞内生真菌多样性及其生防作用评价[D]. 银川: 宁夏大学, 2017.
[53]	蒙盼盼, 冯欢, 陈伟, 等. 楸树实生苗和嫁接苗根相关真菌群落结构和多样性[J]. 菌物学报, 2021, 40(8): 1965-1979.
[54]	赵立君, 刘云根, 王妍, 等. 典型高原湖滨带底泥细菌群落结构及多样性特征[J]. 微生物学通报, 2020, 47(2): 401-410.
[55]	王鹏, 陈波, 张华. 基于高通量测序的鄱阳湖典型湿地土壤细菌群落特征分析[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(5): 1650-1658.
[56]	KLATT C G, LIU Z F, LUDWIG M, et al. Temporal metatranscriptomic patterning in phototrophic Chloroflexi inhabiting a microbial mat in a geothermal spring[J]. The ISME Journal, 2013, 7(9): 1775-1789.