
Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2025, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (9): 2271-2279.DOI: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20240686
Previous Articles Next Articles
XU Jiezhang1(
), YE Chenshuai2, ZHOU Qingwei2, WU Weihong2, TONG Xiaocui1,*(
)
Received:2024-08-30
Online:2025-09-11
Published:2025-10-14
CLC Number:
XU Jiezhang, YE Chenshuai, ZHOU Qingwei, WU Weihong, TONG Xiaocui. Study on soil fertility characteristics in the low mountain and hilly areas of central Zhejiang[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(9): 2271-2279.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnykx.cn/EN/10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20240686
| 特征值 | 全氮含量/ (g·kg-1) | 有效磷含量/ (mg·kg-1) | 速效钾含量/ (mg·kg-1) | 有机质含量/ (g·kg-1) | pH值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 平均值 | 1.62 | 43.00 | 107.34 | 27.64 | 5.27 |
| 标准差 | 0.41 | 65.63 | 69.11 | 6.80 | 0.44 |
| 变异系数/% | 25.40 | 152.62 | 64.38 | 24.59 | 8.29 |
Table 1 Status of overall soil fertility in Yongkang City
| 特征值 | 全氮含量/ (g·kg-1) | 有效磷含量/ (mg·kg-1) | 速效钾含量/ (mg·kg-1) | 有机质含量/ (g·kg-1) | pH值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 平均值 | 1.62 | 43.00 | 107.34 | 27.64 | 5.27 |
| 标准差 | 0.41 | 65.63 | 69.11 | 6.80 | 0.44 |
| 变异系数/% | 25.40 | 152.62 | 64.38 | 24.59 | 8.29 |
| 区域 | 指标 | 肥力指标 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 全氮含量/ (g·kg-1) | 有效磷含量/ (mg·kg-1) | 速效钾含量/ (mg·kg-1) | 有机质含量/ (g·kg-1) | pH值 | ||
| 城西新区 | 平均值 | 1.66 | 25.64 | 90.83 | 28.08 | 5.32 |
| 变异系数/% | 23.75 | 118.41 | 66.71 | 27.54 | 5.11 | |
| 东城街道 | 平均值 | 1.68 | 74.45 | 123.03 | 27.59 | 5.40 |
| 变异系数/% | 32.26 | 105.88 | 60.29 | 26.62 | 10.43 | |
| 方岩镇 | 平均值 | 1.53 | 86.61 | 96.86 | 24.99 | 4.72 |
| 变异系数/% | 29.89 | 104.27 | 45.71 | 28.29 | 6.83 | |
| 古山镇 | 平均值 | 1.72 | 19.60 | 92.55 | 29.07 | 5.14 |
| 变异系数/% | 22.04 | 123.61 | 50.45 | 22.62 | 6.67 | |
| 花街镇 | 平均值 | 1.55 | 42.74 | 87.59 | 26.78 | 5.28 |
| 变异系数/% | 27.14 | 107.09 | 61.53 | 26.34 | 9.84 | |
| 江南街道 | 平均值 | 1.70 | 98.21 | 184.06 | 29.53 | 5.33 |
| 变异系数/% | 24.04 | 68.71 | 70.07 | 21.97 | 10.94 | |
| 开发区 | 平均值 | 1.43 | 21.10 | 71.00 | 23.50 | 5.64 |
| 变异系数/% | 19.35 | 38.20 | 7.97 | 13.24 | 2.89 | |
| 龙山镇 | 平均值 | 1.65 | 16.47 | 83.94 | 28.67 | 5.23 |
| 变异系数/% | 23.62 | 160.82 | 43.70 | 23.87 | 9.88 | |
| 前仓镇 | 平均值 | 1.49 | 52.22 | 91.78 | 25.47 | 5.17 |
| 变异系数/% | 21.90 | 154.01 | 68.33 | 21.35 | 4.55 | |
| 石柱镇 | 平均值 | 1.46 | 39.48 | 126.36 | 24.57 | 5.25 |
| 变异系数/% | 26.70 | 61.75 | 53.60 | 25.72 | 6.06 | |
| 唐先镇 | 平均值 | 1.60 | 75.96 | 128.87 | 27.69 | 5.44 |
| 变异系数/% | 28.31 | 168.43 | 72.47 | 24.09 | 11.01 | |
| 西城街道 | 平均值 | 1.62 | 39.88 | 108.47 | 27.40 | 5.41 |
| 变异系数/% | 30.93 | 78.57 | 53.41 | 27.65 | 10.92 | |
| 西溪镇 | 平均值 | 1.72 | 85.30 | 114.27 | 31.20 | 5.14 |
| 变异系数/% | 17.26 | 151.21 | 68.20 | 17.14 | 8.28 | |
| 象珠镇 | 平均值 | 1.61 | 26.26 | 100.27 | 27.87 | 5.32 |
| 变异系数/% | 23.94 | 117.59 | 62.60 | 22.26 | 7.87 | |
| 芝英镇 | 平均值 | 1.74 | 22.90 | 90.15 | 29.35 | 5.28 |
| 变异系数/% | 20.72 | 106.17 | 53.51 | 20.65 | 7.00 | |
| 舟山镇 | 平均值 | 1.59 | 39.52 | 95.24 | 26.91 | 5.21 |
| 变异系数/% | 23.82 | 215.62 | 50.19 | 27.31 | 7.94 | |
Table 2 Comparison of soil fertility status in different towns (sub-districts)
| 区域 | 指标 | 肥力指标 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 全氮含量/ (g·kg-1) | 有效磷含量/ (mg·kg-1) | 速效钾含量/ (mg·kg-1) | 有机质含量/ (g·kg-1) | pH值 | ||
| 城西新区 | 平均值 | 1.66 | 25.64 | 90.83 | 28.08 | 5.32 |
| 变异系数/% | 23.75 | 118.41 | 66.71 | 27.54 | 5.11 | |
| 东城街道 | 平均值 | 1.68 | 74.45 | 123.03 | 27.59 | 5.40 |
| 变异系数/% | 32.26 | 105.88 | 60.29 | 26.62 | 10.43 | |
| 方岩镇 | 平均值 | 1.53 | 86.61 | 96.86 | 24.99 | 4.72 |
| 变异系数/% | 29.89 | 104.27 | 45.71 | 28.29 | 6.83 | |
| 古山镇 | 平均值 | 1.72 | 19.60 | 92.55 | 29.07 | 5.14 |
| 变异系数/% | 22.04 | 123.61 | 50.45 | 22.62 | 6.67 | |
| 花街镇 | 平均值 | 1.55 | 42.74 | 87.59 | 26.78 | 5.28 |
| 变异系数/% | 27.14 | 107.09 | 61.53 | 26.34 | 9.84 | |
| 江南街道 | 平均值 | 1.70 | 98.21 | 184.06 | 29.53 | 5.33 |
| 变异系数/% | 24.04 | 68.71 | 70.07 | 21.97 | 10.94 | |
| 开发区 | 平均值 | 1.43 | 21.10 | 71.00 | 23.50 | 5.64 |
| 变异系数/% | 19.35 | 38.20 | 7.97 | 13.24 | 2.89 | |
| 龙山镇 | 平均值 | 1.65 | 16.47 | 83.94 | 28.67 | 5.23 |
| 变异系数/% | 23.62 | 160.82 | 43.70 | 23.87 | 9.88 | |
| 前仓镇 | 平均值 | 1.49 | 52.22 | 91.78 | 25.47 | 5.17 |
| 变异系数/% | 21.90 | 154.01 | 68.33 | 21.35 | 4.55 | |
| 石柱镇 | 平均值 | 1.46 | 39.48 | 126.36 | 24.57 | 5.25 |
| 变异系数/% | 26.70 | 61.75 | 53.60 | 25.72 | 6.06 | |
| 唐先镇 | 平均值 | 1.60 | 75.96 | 128.87 | 27.69 | 5.44 |
| 变异系数/% | 28.31 | 168.43 | 72.47 | 24.09 | 11.01 | |
| 西城街道 | 平均值 | 1.62 | 39.88 | 108.47 | 27.40 | 5.41 |
| 变异系数/% | 30.93 | 78.57 | 53.41 | 27.65 | 10.92 | |
| 西溪镇 | 平均值 | 1.72 | 85.30 | 114.27 | 31.20 | 5.14 |
| 变异系数/% | 17.26 | 151.21 | 68.20 | 17.14 | 8.28 | |
| 象珠镇 | 平均值 | 1.61 | 26.26 | 100.27 | 27.87 | 5.32 |
| 变异系数/% | 23.94 | 117.59 | 62.60 | 22.26 | 7.87 | |
| 芝英镇 | 平均值 | 1.74 | 22.90 | 90.15 | 29.35 | 5.28 |
| 变异系数/% | 20.72 | 106.17 | 53.51 | 20.65 | 7.00 | |
| 舟山镇 | 平均值 | 1.59 | 39.52 | 95.24 | 26.91 | 5.21 |
| 变异系数/% | 23.82 | 215.62 | 50.19 | 27.31 | 7.94 | |
| 指标 | pH值 | 有机质含量 | 全氮含量 | 速效磷含量 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 有机质含量 | 0.018 2** | |||
| 全氮含量 | 0.016 8** | 0.883 0** | ||
| 速效磷含量 | 0.012 8** | 0.035 7** | 0.028 9** | |
| 速效钾含量 | -0.001 1 | 0.003 3 | 0.003 7* | 0.311 1** |
Table 3 Correlation analysis of various physical and chemical properties of cultivated soil in Yongkang City
| 指标 | pH值 | 有机质含量 | 全氮含量 | 速效磷含量 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 有机质含量 | 0.018 2** | |||
| 全氮含量 | 0.016 8** | 0.883 0** | ||
| 速效磷含量 | 0.012 8** | 0.035 7** | 0.028 9** | |
| 速效钾含量 | -0.001 1 | 0.003 3 | 0.003 7* | 0.311 1** |
| [1] | 廖永松. 我国流域尺度上的灌溉水平衡与粮食安全保障[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2003. |
| [2] | 王军, 李萍, 詹韵秋, 等. 中国耕地质量保护与提升问题研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2019, 29(4): 87-93. |
| [3] | 陈印军, 王晋臣, 肖碧林, 等. 我国耕地质量变化态势分析[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2011, 32(2): 1-5. |
| [4] | 王晓凌, 陈明灿, 张雷. 不同耕作方式对土壤微生物量和土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2007, 13(12): 28-30. |
| [5] | 于洋. 陕西省耕地土壤养分状况及耕地地力评价研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2016. |
| [6] | 杨帆, 徐洋, 崔勇, 等. 近30年中国农田耕层土壤有机质含量变化[J]. 土壤学报, 2017, 54(5): 1047-1056. |
| [7] | 李志鹏. 渭河平原县域农田土壤养分肥力空间特征研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2014. |
| [8] | 黄健, 张惠琳, 傅文玉, 等. 东北黑土区土壤肥力变化特征的分析[J]. 土壤通报, 2005, 36(5): 659-663. |
| [9] | 陈远利, 陈义, 吴良欢. 永康市水稻田地力状况分析及其提升技术[J]. 中国稻米, 2012, 18(5): 82-84. |
| [10] | 王新溪, 陆若辉, 唐良梁, 等. 永康市标准农田地力提升试验[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2018, 59(7): 1294-1296. |
| [11] | 刘晓霞, 陈正道, 陈一定, 等. 浙江省耕地质量信息化建设现状分析及对策研究[J]. 中国农技推广, 2020, 36(11): 9-10, 8. |
| [12] | 鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2000. |
| [13] | 倪中应, 刘永红, 石一珺, 等. 桐庐县农地土壤肥力现状及其变化特征分析[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2015, 56(7): 1107-1109. |
| [14] | 李丹, 倪中应, 章林英, 等. 桐庐县旱地土壤肥力现状及其培肥对策[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2014, 55(11): 1767-1770. |
| [15] | GAO J C, ZHANG X Z, LUO J F, et al. Changes in soil fertility under partial organic substitution of chemical fertilizer: a 33-year trial[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2023, 103(15): 7424-7433. |
| [16] | 吴嘉平, 荆长伟, 支俊俊. 浙江省土壤数据库及其应用[M]. 杭州: 浙江大学出版社, 2014. |
| [17] | ASIRIFI I, KAETZL K, WERNER S, et al. Biochar for wastewater treatment and soil improvement in irrigated urban agriculture: single and combined effects on crop yields and soil fertility[J]. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 2023, 23(1): 1408-1420. |
| [18] | 周富忠. 利川市耕地酸化的成因及治理措施研究[D]. 荆州: 长江大学, 2012. |
| [19] | 鲁洪娟, 周德林, 叶文玲, 等. 生物有机肥在土壤改良和重金属污染修复中的研究进展[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2019, 41(11): 1378-1383. |
| [20] | 王丹丹, 岳书平, 林芬芳, 等. 东北地区旱地土壤全氮空间变异性对幅度拓展的响应[J]. 土壤学报, 2012, 49(4): 625-635. |
| [21] | 鲁如坤, 刘鸿翔, 闻大中, 等. 我国典型地区农业生态系统养分循环和平衡研究: Ⅴ.农田养分平衡和土壤有效磷、钾消长规律[J]. 土壤通报, 1996, 27(6): 241-242. |
| [22] | 姚静, 张永娥, 王瑞良, 等. 不同利用方式对鲁南地区耕地土壤养分状况的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2010, 38(14): 7431-7434. |
| [23] | 尤琛. 水分梯度上不同灌木生长对干旱河谷土壤理化和生物学性质的影响[D]. 成都: 中国科学院研究生院(成都生物研究所), 2007. |
| [24] | 姬佳旗. 牡蛎壳粉调节土壤pH及控制烟草青枯病的效果研究[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2020. |
| [25] | 陆景冈, 吴建军, 赵东, 等. 我国古红土与茶叶生长[J]. 茶叶科学, 2006, 26(2): 87-90. |
| [26] | 季卫英, 汪洁, 黄苏庆, 等. 浙江省酸化耕地现状、治理成效及对策建议[J]. 中国农业综合开发, 2023(9): 29-31. |
| [27] | 赵燕洲. 鸡粪有机肥和无机肥配施对烟叶产量及品质的影响[J]. 安徽农学通报(上半月刊), 2012, 18(7): 91-92. |
| [28] | 宋阳. 南京紫金山坡地、草地、茶园土壤有机质与全氮的关系[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2012, 40(9): 326-328. |
| [29] | 杨海明. 丰镇市农田土壤有机质与全氮含量关系分析[J]. 现代农业, 2016(3): 57. |
| [30] | 徐明岗. 陕西土壤有机质与全氮量的关系[J]. 陕西林业科技, 1993, 21(2): 9-10, 37. |
| [31] | 文永莉. 不同施肥条件下旱地红壤铁铝氧化物转化与固碳机理研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2017. |
| [32] | 王龙, 马杰, 邓迎璇, 等. 金属离子在铁(氢)氧化物与腐殖质微界面上的吸附机理和模型研究进展[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2017, 34(5): 405-413. |
| [1] | ZHENG Shenghua, XU Kai, ZHOU Jin, CHEN Honglin, MA Mingkun, YANG Zepeng, AO Yuqin, LIU Dinghui. Study on the path of improving soil fertility and efficient planting models in reclaimed land—A case study of ecological zone of Shuangliu District, Chengdu City [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(9): 2287-2291. |
| [2] | YIN Beibei, HUANG Jinsheng, WANG Lei, ZHOU Liuqiang, ZHU Xiaohui, PENG Jiayu, XIE Rulin, ZENG Yan, OU Huiping, LI Zhongning, LU Hongmei, MO Wenbin, HE Dongqiu, LIU Lijun, ZHANG Xian. Relationship between soil acidity and exchangeable hydrogen and aluminum in tea gardens of Guangxi [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(6): 1349-1354. |
| [3] | MA Liang, JIN Xinmei, ZHANG Weixing, FANG Yunfeng. Effects of biochar and organic fertilizer on soil properties and rice growth [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(3): 580-584. |
| [4] | WEN Mingxia, HUANG Bei, WANG Peng, WU Shaohui. Effects of different green manures on soil fertility and plant growth in citrus orchards [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(3): 662-666. |
| [5] | JIANG Shenyue, XUE Zhaokun, JIANG Huaqin, MENG Qingjiu, SHAO Sainan, DIAO Zhihan, YU Keru, YE Zhengqian, JIANG Yugen. Discussion on the rapid fertilization technology for the restoration of non-grain cultivated land [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(1): 218-223. |
| [6] | ZHANG Weiling, GE Furong, XU Jinggao, ZHENG Xuqian, YE Zhengqian. Study on the effect of soil conditioner combined with organic fertilizer on soil fertility and tea safety production in tea garden [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(9): 2069-2074. |
| [7] | WEN Wei, PAN Jianqing, YU Bo, XIE Jing, MA Junwei, YANG Yan, WANG Feng. Study on the application effect of the main acidification management model for grape cultivated land in Changxing County [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(8): 1838-1842. |
| [8] | SHEN Jianguo, ZHENG Dongming, LOU Ling, WANG Jingwen, GU Wanfan, LI Agen. Effects of microbial compound fertilizer substitution of conventional chemical fertilizer and its reduced application on rice growth and soil fertility [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(8): 1867-1872. |
| [9] | ZHANG Wenyong, CHEN Guanghui, CHEN Zhaoming. Effects of different fertilization patterns on yield and soil fertility of double cropping rice [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(7): 1547-1550. |
| [10] | WU Lintu, XU Huozhong, LI Guisong, YE Chunfu, HE Jinfa, WANG Yunxiang, PAN Yingjie, WANG Yueyuan, YE Zhengqian. Effects of different passivators on soil and tea quality in tea plantations [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(7): 1571-1577. |
| [11] | XU Jianfeng, WU Jiale, JIN Yuqing, CAI Jianjun, YE Zhengqian. Effects of side-deep placement of fertilizer on rice yield and nutrient absorption [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(6): 1297-1301. |
| [12] | XU Youxiang, ZHU Zhenling, WANG Yufei, ZHOU Lingxiao. Effects of organic substitution of chemical fertilizers on yield, quality and soil fertility of fresh maize [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(6): 1329-1332. |
| [13] | HU Litao, LI Hang, SU Mengdi, ZHAO Longjie, AO Fei, HUANG Langping, FU Chunmei, LUO Junzhao, CHEN Junhua, MA Xiao, ZHANG Songtao. Comprehensive evaluation of tobacco soil fertility in Fengdu County of Chongqing [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(6): 1358-1363. |
| [14] | XIANG Shuyan, ZHAN Lichuan, ZHOU Qingwei, JIN Meiqing, WU Weihong, FU Li. Study on the difference of soil properties in different tea planting years [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(6): 1364-1369. |
| [15] | LI Guisong, WU Lintu, XU Huozhong, WANG Yunxiang, ZHOU Ling'ai, TANG Shiqin, LIU Qiming, HE Jinfa, CHI Yongqing. Effects of different microbial fertilizer and its dosage on soil and tea quality in tea garden [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(5): 1208-1214. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||