
Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2026, Vol. 67 ›› Issue (3): 652-661.DOI: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20240906
Previous Articles Next Articles
HUANG Ting1,2(
), PAN Zhanbing1,2, ZUO Zhong1(
), ZHAO Zidan3, FAN Jinxin1, YANG Hui1
Received:2024-11-29
Online:2026-03-11
Published:2026-03-30
Contact:
ZUO Zhong
CLC Number:
HUANG Ting, PAN Zhanbing, ZUO Zhong, ZHAO Zidan, FAN Jinxin, YANG Hui. Response patterns and quality evaluation of main medicinal components in different honeysuckle varieties under drought stress[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(3): 652-661.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnykx.cn/EN/10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20240906
| 药用成分 | 干旱胁迫处理 | 品种 | 干旱胁迫处理×品种 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F值 | p | F值 | p | F值 | p | |
| 绿原酸 | 7.437 | 0.258 | 37.972 | <0.001 | 1.042 | 0.432 |
| 新绿原酸 | 35.585 | <0.001 | 255.270 | <0.001 | 6.093 | <0.001 |
| 异绿原酸A | 3.027 | 0.026 | 8.111 | <0.001 | 0.384 | 0.981 |
| 异绿原酸C | 15.152 | <0.001 | 44.171 | <0.001 | 2.116 | 0.022 |
| 木犀草苷 | 3.310 | 0.018 | 19.781 | <0.001 | 0.508 | 0.931 |
| 忍冬苷 | 7.707 | <0.001 | 1.285 | 0.289 | 0.290 | 0.996 |
| 断氧化马钱子苷 | 4 720.913 | 0.037 | 278 011.318 | <0.001 | 228.006 | 0.986 |
| 断马钱子酸 | 19.896 | 0.614 | 265.271 | 0.035 | 3.408 | 0.522 |
Table 1 Two-factor analysis of variance
| 药用成分 | 干旱胁迫处理 | 品种 | 干旱胁迫处理×品种 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F值 | p | F值 | p | F值 | p | |
| 绿原酸 | 7.437 | 0.258 | 37.972 | <0.001 | 1.042 | 0.432 |
| 新绿原酸 | 35.585 | <0.001 | 255.270 | <0.001 | 6.093 | <0.001 |
| 异绿原酸A | 3.027 | 0.026 | 8.111 | <0.001 | 0.384 | 0.981 |
| 异绿原酸C | 15.152 | <0.001 | 44.171 | <0.001 | 2.116 | 0.022 |
| 木犀草苷 | 3.310 | 0.018 | 19.781 | <0.001 | 0.508 | 0.931 |
| 忍冬苷 | 7.707 | <0.001 | 1.285 | 0.289 | 0.290 | 0.996 |
| 断氧化马钱子苷 | 4 720.913 | 0.037 | 278 011.318 | <0.001 | 228.006 | 0.986 |
| 断马钱子酸 | 19.896 | 0.614 | 265.271 | 0.035 | 3.408 | 0.522 |
| 药用成分 | 绿原酸 | 新绿原酸 | 异绿原酸A | 异绿原酸C | 木犀草苷 | 忍冬苷 | 断氧化马钱子苷 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 新绿原酸 | 0.008 | ||||||
| 异绿原酸A | 0.025 | 0.944** | |||||
| 异绿原酸C | 0.340* | 0.598** | 0.658** | ||||
| 木犀草苷 | 0.603** | -0.560** | -0.461* | 0.034 | |||
| 忍冬苷 | 0.475** | 0.476** | 0.549** | 0.381* | 0.282 | ||
| 断氧化马钱子苷 | 0.512** | -0.696** | -0.637** | -0.071 | 0.923 | 0.066 | |
| 断马钱子酸 | -0.391* | 0.844** | 0.880** | 0.420* | -0.732 | 0.258 | -0.868** |
Table 2 Correlation coefficient matrix of main medicinal components in honeysuckle
| 药用成分 | 绿原酸 | 新绿原酸 | 异绿原酸A | 异绿原酸C | 木犀草苷 | 忍冬苷 | 断氧化马钱子苷 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 新绿原酸 | 0.008 | ||||||
| 异绿原酸A | 0.025 | 0.944** | |||||
| 异绿原酸C | 0.340* | 0.598** | 0.658** | ||||
| 木犀草苷 | 0.603** | -0.560** | -0.461* | 0.034 | |||
| 忍冬苷 | 0.475** | 0.476** | 0.549** | 0.381* | 0.282 | ||
| 断氧化马钱子苷 | 0.512** | -0.696** | -0.637** | -0.071 | 0.923 | 0.066 | |
| 断马钱子酸 | -0.391* | 0.844** | 0.880** | 0.420* | -0.732 | 0.258 | -0.868** |
| 主成分 | 初始特征值 | 旋转结果 | 主成分权重 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 特征值 | 方差贡献率/% | 累积贡献率/% | 特征值 | 方差贡献率/% | 累积贡献率/% | ||
| 1 | 4.373 | 54.665 | 54.665 | 3.804 | 47.552 | 47.552 | 0.640 |
| 2 | 2.461 | 30.762 | 85.428 | 3.030 | 37.876 | 85.428 | 0.360 |
| 3 | 0.602 | 7.526 | 92.954 | ||||
| 4 | 0.389 | 4.858 | 97.812 | ||||
| 5 | 0.085 | 1.059 | 98.871 | ||||
| 6 | 0.047 | 0.582 | 99.453 | ||||
| 7 | 0.035 | 0.438 | 99.891 | ||||
| 8 | 0.009 | 0.109 | 100.000 | ||||
Table 3 Explained total variance of principal component scores
| 主成分 | 初始特征值 | 旋转结果 | 主成分权重 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 特征值 | 方差贡献率/% | 累积贡献率/% | 特征值 | 方差贡献率/% | 累积贡献率/% | ||
| 1 | 4.373 | 54.665 | 54.665 | 3.804 | 47.552 | 47.552 | 0.640 |
| 2 | 2.461 | 30.762 | 85.428 | 3.030 | 37.876 | 85.428 | 0.360 |
| 3 | 0.602 | 7.526 | 92.954 | ||||
| 4 | 0.389 | 4.858 | 97.812 | ||||
| 5 | 0.085 | 1.059 | 98.871 | ||||
| 6 | 0.047 | 0.582 | 99.453 | ||||
| 7 | 0.035 | 0.438 | 99.891 | ||||
| 8 | 0.009 | 0.109 | 100.000 | ||||
| 品种 | 处理 | 主成分1得分 | 主成分2得分 | 综合得分 | 排序 | 处理 | 品种 | 主成分1得分 | 主成分2得分 | 综合得分 | 排序 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | B1 | -0.60 | -0.96 | -0.73 | 5 | B1 | A1 | -0.60 | -0.96 | -0.73 | 2 | |
| B2 | -0.43 | 0.05 | -0.25 | 4 | A2 | 1.20 | -1.06 | 0.39 | 1 | |||
| B3 | -0.36 | 0.44 | -0.07 | 3 | A3 | -0.78 | -1.98 | -1.22 | 5 | |||
| B4 | -0.26 | 0.48 | 0.01 | 2 | A4 | -1.06 | -0.91 | -1.00 | 4 | |||
| B5 | -0.21 | 1.75 | 0.49 | 1 | A5 | -0.58 | -1.62 | -0.95 | 3 | |||
| A2 | B1 | 1.20 | -1.06 | 0.39 | 5 | B2 | A1 | -0.43 | 0.05 | -0.25 | 3 | |
| B2 | 1.63 | -0.27 | 0.95 | 4 | A2 | 1.63 | -0.27 | 0.95 | 1 | |||
| B3 | 1.94 | -0.07 | 1.22 | 3 | A3 | -0.38 | -0.05 | -0.26 | 4 | |||
| B4 | 2.11 | 0.09 | 1.38 | 2 | A4 | -0.66 | 0.54 | -0.23 | 2 | |||
| B5 | 2.43 | 0.14 | 1.61 | 1 | A5 | -0.36 | -0.71 | -0.49 | 5 | |||
| A3 | B1 | -0.78 | -1.98 | -1.22 | 5 | B3 | A1 | -0.36 | 0.44 | -0.07 | 3 | |
| B2 | -0.38 | -0.05 | -0.26 | 4 | A2 | 1.94 | -0.07 | 1.22 | 1 | |||
| B3 | -0.01 | 1.17 | 0.07 | 3 | A3 | -0.01 | 1.17 | 0.42 | 2 | |||
| B4 | -0.25 | 0.65 | 0.42 | 2 | A4 | -0.78 | 0.97 | -0.15 | 4 | |||
| B5 | 0.01 | 1.32 | 0.48 | 1 | A5 | -0.37 | -0.83 | -0.54 | 5 | |||
| A4 | B1 | -1.06 | -0.91 | -1.00 | 5 | B4 | A1 | -0.26 | 0.48 | 0.01 | 3 | |
| B2 | -0.66 | 0.54 | -0.23 | 4 | A2 | 2.11 | 0.09 | 1.38 | 1 | |||
| B3 | -0.78 | 0.97 | -0.15 | 3 | A3 | -0.25 | 0.65 | 0.07 | 2 | |||
| B4 | -0.83 | 1.18 | -0.11 | 2 | A4 | -0.83 | 1.18 | -0.11 | 4 | |||
| B5 | -0.71 | 1.42 | 0.06 | 1 | A5 | -0.36 | -1.07 | -0.62 | 5 | |||
| A5 | B1 | -0.58 | -1.62 | -0.95 | 5 | B5 | A1 | -0.21 | 1.75 | 0.49 | 2 | |
| B2 | -0.36 | -0.71 | -0.49 | 2 | A2 | 2.43 | 0.14 | 1.61 | 1 | |||
| B3 | -0.37 | -0.83 | -0.54 | 3 | A3 | 0.01 | 1.32 | 0.48 | 3 | |||
| B4 | -0.36 | -1.07 | -0.62 | 4 | A4 | -0.71 | 1.42 | 0.06 | 4 | |||
| B5 | -0.33 | -0.67 | -0.46 | 1 | A5 | -0.33 | -0.67 | -0.46 | 5 |
Table 4 Comprehensive scores and ranking of different varieties under different drought stress treatments
| 品种 | 处理 | 主成分1得分 | 主成分2得分 | 综合得分 | 排序 | 处理 | 品种 | 主成分1得分 | 主成分2得分 | 综合得分 | 排序 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | B1 | -0.60 | -0.96 | -0.73 | 5 | B1 | A1 | -0.60 | -0.96 | -0.73 | 2 | |
| B2 | -0.43 | 0.05 | -0.25 | 4 | A2 | 1.20 | -1.06 | 0.39 | 1 | |||
| B3 | -0.36 | 0.44 | -0.07 | 3 | A3 | -0.78 | -1.98 | -1.22 | 5 | |||
| B4 | -0.26 | 0.48 | 0.01 | 2 | A4 | -1.06 | -0.91 | -1.00 | 4 | |||
| B5 | -0.21 | 1.75 | 0.49 | 1 | A5 | -0.58 | -1.62 | -0.95 | 3 | |||
| A2 | B1 | 1.20 | -1.06 | 0.39 | 5 | B2 | A1 | -0.43 | 0.05 | -0.25 | 3 | |
| B2 | 1.63 | -0.27 | 0.95 | 4 | A2 | 1.63 | -0.27 | 0.95 | 1 | |||
| B3 | 1.94 | -0.07 | 1.22 | 3 | A3 | -0.38 | -0.05 | -0.26 | 4 | |||
| B4 | 2.11 | 0.09 | 1.38 | 2 | A4 | -0.66 | 0.54 | -0.23 | 2 | |||
| B5 | 2.43 | 0.14 | 1.61 | 1 | A5 | -0.36 | -0.71 | -0.49 | 5 | |||
| A3 | B1 | -0.78 | -1.98 | -1.22 | 5 | B3 | A1 | -0.36 | 0.44 | -0.07 | 3 | |
| B2 | -0.38 | -0.05 | -0.26 | 4 | A2 | 1.94 | -0.07 | 1.22 | 1 | |||
| B3 | -0.01 | 1.17 | 0.07 | 3 | A3 | -0.01 | 1.17 | 0.42 | 2 | |||
| B4 | -0.25 | 0.65 | 0.42 | 2 | A4 | -0.78 | 0.97 | -0.15 | 4 | |||
| B5 | 0.01 | 1.32 | 0.48 | 1 | A5 | -0.37 | -0.83 | -0.54 | 5 | |||
| A4 | B1 | -1.06 | -0.91 | -1.00 | 5 | B4 | A1 | -0.26 | 0.48 | 0.01 | 3 | |
| B2 | -0.66 | 0.54 | -0.23 | 4 | A2 | 2.11 | 0.09 | 1.38 | 1 | |||
| B3 | -0.78 | 0.97 | -0.15 | 3 | A3 | -0.25 | 0.65 | 0.07 | 2 | |||
| B4 | -0.83 | 1.18 | -0.11 | 2 | A4 | -0.83 | 1.18 | -0.11 | 4 | |||
| B5 | -0.71 | 1.42 | 0.06 | 1 | A5 | -0.36 | -1.07 | -0.62 | 5 | |||
| A5 | B1 | -0.58 | -1.62 | -0.95 | 5 | B5 | A1 | -0.21 | 1.75 | 0.49 | 2 | |
| B2 | -0.36 | -0.71 | -0.49 | 2 | A2 | 2.43 | 0.14 | 1.61 | 1 | |||
| B3 | -0.37 | -0.83 | -0.54 | 3 | A3 | 0.01 | 1.32 | 0.48 | 3 | |||
| B4 | -0.36 | -1.07 | -0.62 | 4 | A4 | -0.71 | 1.42 | 0.06 | 4 | |||
| B5 | -0.33 | -0.67 | -0.46 | 1 | A5 | -0.33 | -0.67 | -0.46 | 5 |
| [1] | ZHANG Y Z. Analysis of medicinal composition and pharmacological action of Chinese medicine honeysuckle[J]. IOP Conference Series:Materials Science and Engineering,2019,569(2):022030. |
| [2] | YUAN Y, SONG L P, LI M H,et al. Genetic variation and metabolic pathway intricacy govern the active compound content and quality of the Chinese medicinal plant Lonicera japonica thunb[J]. BMC Genomics,2012,13:195. |
| [3] | CLIFFORD M N, JAGANATH I B, LUDWIG I A,et al. Chlorogenic acids and the acyl-quinic acids:discovery,biosynthesis,bioavailability and bioactivity[J]. Natural Product Reports,2017,34(12):1391-1421. |
| [4] | 林启寿. 中草药成分化学[M]. 北京:科学出版社,1977:146. |
| [5] | WU L. Effect of chlorogenic acid on antioxidant activity of Flos Lonicerae extracts[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B,2007,8(9):673-679. |
| [6] | KU S K, SEO B I, PARK J H,et al. Effect of Lonicerae Flos extracts on reflux esophagitis with antioxidant activity[J]. World Journal of Gastroenterology,2009,15(38):4799-4805. |
| [7] | 席利莎,木泰华,孙红男. 绿原酸类物质的国内外研究进展[J]. 核农学报,2014,28(2):292-301. |
| XI L S, MU T H, SUN H N. Progresses in the research of chlorogenic acids[J]. Acta Agriculturae Nucleatae Sinica,2014,28(2):292-301. | |
| [8] | 管仁伟,曲永胜,顾正位,等. 木犀草苷的药理作用研究[J]. 中国野生植物资源,2014(1):1-3. |
| GUAN R W, QU Y S, GU Z W,et al. Studies on pharmacological effects of luteoloside[J]. Chinese Wild Plant Resources,2014(1):1-3. | |
| [9] | 宋亚玲,倪付勇,赵祎武,等. 金银花化学成分研究进展[J]. 中草药,2014,45(24):3656-3664. |
| SONG Y L, NI F Y, ZHAO Y W,et al. Research progress on chemical constituents from Lonicerae Flos [J]. Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs,2014,45(24):3656-3664. | |
| [10] | OKU H, OGAWA Y, IWAOKA E,et al. Allergy-preventive effects of chlorogenic acid and iridoid derivatives from flower buds of Lonicera japonica [J]. Biological & Pharmaceutical Bulletin,2011,34(8):1330-1333. |
| [11] | RECIO M C, GINER R M, MÁÑEZ S,et al. Structural considerations on the iridoids as anti-inflammatory agents[J]. Planta Medica,1994,60(3):232-234. |
| [12] | 包杨梅,刘华,李明,等. 硼肥对宁夏压砂地金银花产量及绿原酸含量的影响[J]. 北方园艺,2022(15):113-120. |
| BAO Y M, LIU H, LI M,et al. Effects of boron fertilizer on the yield and chlorogenic acid content of Lonicera japonica Thunb. in Ningxia gravel-sand mulched field[J]. Northern Horticulture,2022(15):113-120. | |
| [13] | 李姝瑾,马俊凯,焦娇,等. HPLC法同时测定武当山地区金银花中绿原酸和木犀草苷含量[J]. 中兽医医药杂志,2019,38(1):63-65. |
| LI S J, MA J K, JIAO J,et al. Determination of chlorogenic acid and galuteolin in Flos Lonicerae in Wudang mountain region by HPLC[J]. Journal of Traditional Chinese Veterinary Medicine,2019,38(1):63-65. | |
| [14] | 梁爽. 不同产地金银花主要活性成分的含量比较[J]. 中国民族民间医药,2014,23(9):4-5. |
| LIANG S. Comparative study on the main active ingredient content of lonicerae flos from different oroducing areas[J]. Chinese Journal of Ethnomedicine and Ethnopharmacy,2014,23(9):4-5. | |
| [15] | 师凤华,赵祥升,莫乔程,等. 不同产地不同种质金银花中绿原酸和木犀草苷的含量分析[J]. 中药材,2014,37(7):1145-1148. |
| SHI F H, ZHAO X S, MO Q C,et al. Determination of chlorogenic acid and luteoloside in Lonicerae Flos of different habitats and germplasms[J]. Journal of Chinese Medicinal Materials,2014,37(7):1145-1148. | |
| [16] | 杨欣欣,王帅,包永睿,等. 不同产地金银花指纹图谱研究[J]. 亚太传统医药,2015,11(5):17-20. |
| YANG X X, WANG S, BAO Y R,et al. Study on fingerprints of Flos Lonicerae from different regions[J]. Asia-Pacific Traditional Medicine,2015,11(5):17-20. | |
| [17] | 李云聪,牛志平,徐美利,等. 甜叶菊与其他植物中绿原酸类成分对比分析[J]. 中国食品添加剂,2021,32(1):1-6. |
| LI Y C, NIU Z P, XU M L,et al. Comparative analysis of chlorogenic acids in stevia and other plants[J]. China Food Additives,2021,32(1):1-6. | |
| [18] | 谭政委,夏伟,许兰杰,等. 不同品系金银花质量评价[J]. 安徽农业科学,2018,46(25):168-171. |
| TAN Z W, XIA W, XU L J,et al. Quality evaluation of honeysuckle in different strains[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences,2018,46(25):168-171. | |
| [19] | 赵磊,张会敏,徐美利,等. 甜叶菊废渣提取物及其主要成分异绿原酸的抗炎作用[J]. 中国食品学报,2021,21(5):117-124. |
| ZHAO L, ZHANG H M, XU M L,et al. Anti-inflammatory effect of stevia residue extract and its main components isochlorogenic acids[J]. Journal of Chinese Institute of Food Science and Technology,2021,21(5):117-124. | |
| [20] | 黄文静,熊乐文,张龙霏,等. 不同种质金银花发育过程中黄酮类成分含量变化规律研究[J]. 中草药,2022,53(10):3156-3164. |
| HUANG W J, XIONG L W, ZHANG L F,et al. Study on content variation of flavonoids in different germplasm during development of Lonicerae Japonicae Flos [J]. Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs,2022,53(10):3156-3164. | |
| [21] | 郑国成,李汉天,庞丽华,等. 不同产地、采收期及加工方法金银花中木犀草苷含量分析[J]. 亚太传统医药,2019,15(6):97-99. |
| ZHENG G C, LI H T, PANG L H,et al. Analysis of the content of galuteolin in Lonicerae Japonicae Flos by different producing areas,harvesting periods and processing methods[J]. Asia-Pacific Traditional Medicine,2019,15(6):97-99. | |
| [22] | 朱文卿,任汉书,郑媛媛,等. 金银花的功能性成分及其生物活性研究进展[J]. 食品工业科技,2021,42(13):412-426. |
| ZHU W Q, REN H S, ZHENG Y Y,et al. Research progress in functional components and bioactivity of honeysuckle[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry,2021,42(13):412-426. | |
| [23] | BARTO E K, CIPOLLINI D. Testing the optimal defense theory and the growth-differentiation balance hypothesis in Arabidopsis thaliana [J]. Oecologia,2005,146(2):169-178. |
| [24] | 杨云富,郭巧生,张守栋,等. 水分胁迫对药用白菊花抗干旱生理及药材内在品质的影响[J]. 中国中药杂志,2009,34(4):486-487. |
| YANG Y F, GUO Q S, ZHANG S D,et al. Effects of water stress on drought resistance physiology and intrinsic quality of medicinal Chrysanthemum morifolium [J]. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica,2009,34(4):486-487. | |
| [25] | TANG C S, CAI W F, KOHL K,et al. Plant stress and allelopathy[M]//Allelopathy. Washington,DC:American Chemical Society,1994:142-157. |
| [26] | 于浩滢,徐志超,闵伟红,等. 干旱胁迫影响药用植物品质的分子机制研究[J]. 世界科学技术:中医药现代化,2018,20(9):1650-1658. |
| YU H Y, XU Z C, MIN W H,et al. Molecular mechanism for the quality of medicinal plants affected by drought stress[J]. Modernization of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Materia Medica:World Science and Technology,2018,20(9):1650-1658. | |
| [27] | 王玲娜,苏征,刘星劼,等. 金银花活性成分与生态因子相关性研究[J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志,2016,22(17):27-31. |
| WANG L N, SU Z, LIU X J,et al. Correlation between bioactive components of Lonicerae Japonicae Flos and ecological factors[J]. Chinese Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical Formulae,2016,22(17):27-31. |
| [1] | HUANG Zhongqin, LI Xiaoshan, SU Zaixing. Breeding and application of Xunong 5,a new maize variety with high yield and multiple resistance [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(3): 562-565. |
| [2] | GU Kami, ZHANG Hao, FEI Wei, XU Feng, ZHANG Xiaoli, LI Fuzhen. Comparison experiment of spring sowing peanut varieties in Daishan County [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(3): 580-584. |
| [3] | MAO Wenlong, CHEN Mingxiang, YING Jianping, CHU Sijie, LIU Tao, WANG Guirong. Preliminary report on the cultivation performance of 13 new rapeseed varieties in Hangzhou City [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(3): 595-599. |
| [4] | MAO Wenlong, YING Jianping, CHENG Dajun, SHENTU Lanxin, XU Shouzeng, SHI Yijun. Characteristics of 33 winter rapeseed varieties and recommendations of superior varieties [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(3): 623-628. |
| [5] | YANG Nianfu, WU Shaojun, MENG Jiali, SHEN Hong, YU Xiang. Breeding of a new watermelon variety Suxiu 2924 [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(3): 662-665. |
| [6] | GAO Bingke, CHEN Yanfang, CHEN Lunlin, WU Jie, DU Hongxia, GUAN Zhong, DING Ge, SHEN Shaohua, JING Xue, YUAN Zhihua, XIE Guoqiang. Preliminary study on the screening experiment of late sowing rapeseed varieties in northern Jiangxi region of China [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(2): 356-360. |
| [7] | XU Ming, SONG Yan, HU Longfei, LIU Xiaowei. Comparative trial of different thick⁃peeled melon cultivars in Suqian City of China [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(2): 390-393. |
| [8] | ZHANG Jinrui, LIU Zeliang, LUO Lei, PU Kairui, WANG Fei, JIANG Zihang, WANG Huadun, CHEN Xinhong, ZHANG Linqing. Mitigative effect of exogenous choline chloride on wheat seedlings under drought stress [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(1): 18-25. |
| [9] | LYU Jingfang, SUN Qiumin, DAI Fen, ZHU Zuoyi. Comprehensive quality evaluation of japonica rice based on principal component and cluster analysis [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(1): 26-33. |
| [10] | YUE Zhichen, ZHAO Yanting, TAO Peng, LEI Juanli, LI Biyuan, HU Qizan. Screening of excellent heat-resistant and fast-growing varieties of Chinese cabbage and their green cultivation techniques [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(8): 1877-1881. |
| [11] | ZHOU Min, WENG Renjun. Breeding of a new muskmelon variety Jinyan 2 [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(8): 1897-1900. |
| [12] | LI Chaosen, ZHANG Ting, WANG Xueyan, GUO Qinwei, WEI Jing, FANG Pingping, XIE Lifen, YI Xiaolei, ZHAO Dongfeng. Breeding of a new variety of ornamental pepper Yuzijiao [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(8): 1920-1923. |
| [13] | ZHANG Huaijie, SONG Yang. Screening of waxy fresh maize varieties in Yuyao City [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(7): 1578-1582. |
| [14] | ZHOU Yao, ZHOU Enqiang, ZHU Yuxiang, YAO Mengnan, MIAO Yamei, LI Bo, ZHAO Na, WEI Libin, WANG Yongqiang, WANG Xuejun. Variety screening of spring soybean in soybean-maize strip intercropping system in Huainan ecological zone [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(7): 1598-1602. |
| [15] | SUO Wenlong, LI Longxi, NIU Yongzhi, GUAN Yajing, ZHENG Yunye. Principal component analysis and comprehensive evaluation of cold and hypoxia resistance of different tobacco varieties at the seedling stage [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(6): 1355-1362. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||