
Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2026, Vol. 67 ›› Issue (9): 2177-2182.DOI: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20250414
Previous Articles Next Articles
MA Chuangju1(
), WANG Dengliang1, SUN Jiancheng1, CHEN Jun1, XU Yanhui1, TONG Lu2, LIU Lili1(
)
Received:2025-06-10
Online:2026-09-11
Published:2026-09-24
Contact:
LIU Lili
CLC Number:
MA Chuangju, WANG Dengliang, SUN Jiancheng, CHEN Jun, XU Yanhui, TONG Lu, LIU Lili. Effects of spraying plant growth regulator and foliar fertilizer on the fruit cracking and quality of hybrid citrus Yangguang 1[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(9): 2177-2182.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnykx.cn/EN/10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20250414
| 处理 | 初花期 | 盛花期 | 果实膨大期 |
|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 清水 | 清水 | 清水 |
| T1 | 30 μg·L-1 6-BA+50 μg·L-1 GA3 | 50 μg·L-1 GA3 | 500倍磷酸二氢钾 |
| T2 | 30 μg·L-1 6-BA+50 μg·L-1 GA3 | 50 μg·L-1 GA3 | 800倍钙镁硼锌铁 |
| T3 | 30 μg·L-1 6-BA+50 μg·L-1 GA3 | 100 μg·L-1 GA3 | 500倍磷酸二氢钾 |
| T4 | 30 μg·L-1 6-BA+50 μg·L-1 GA3 | 100 μg·L-1 GA3 | 800倍钙镁硼锌铁 |
| T5 | 30 μg·L-1 6-BA+50 μg·L-1 GA3 | 200 μg·L-1 GA3 | 500倍磷酸二氢钾 |
| T6 | 30 μg·L-1 6-BA+50 μg·L-1 GA3 | 200 μg·L-1 GA3 | 800倍钙镁硼锌铁 |
| T7 | 清水 | 清水 | 200 μg·L-1 GA3+500倍磷酸二氢钾 |
| T8 | 清水 | 清水 | 200 μg·L-1 GA3+800倍钙镁硼锌铁 |
Table 1 Combined treatments of different plant growth regulators and foliar fertilizers
| 处理 | 初花期 | 盛花期 | 果实膨大期 |
|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 清水 | 清水 | 清水 |
| T1 | 30 μg·L-1 6-BA+50 μg·L-1 GA3 | 50 μg·L-1 GA3 | 500倍磷酸二氢钾 |
| T2 | 30 μg·L-1 6-BA+50 μg·L-1 GA3 | 50 μg·L-1 GA3 | 800倍钙镁硼锌铁 |
| T3 | 30 μg·L-1 6-BA+50 μg·L-1 GA3 | 100 μg·L-1 GA3 | 500倍磷酸二氢钾 |
| T4 | 30 μg·L-1 6-BA+50 μg·L-1 GA3 | 100 μg·L-1 GA3 | 800倍钙镁硼锌铁 |
| T5 | 30 μg·L-1 6-BA+50 μg·L-1 GA3 | 200 μg·L-1 GA3 | 500倍磷酸二氢钾 |
| T6 | 30 μg·L-1 6-BA+50 μg·L-1 GA3 | 200 μg·L-1 GA3 | 800倍钙镁硼锌铁 |
| T7 | 清水 | 清水 | 200 μg·L-1 GA3+500倍磷酸二氢钾 |
| T8 | 清水 | 清水 | 200 μg·L-1 GA3+800倍钙镁硼锌铁 |
| 处理 | 单果重/g | 果皮重/g | 可食率/% | 果皮厚度/mm | 果实纵径/mm | 果实横径/mm | 果形指数 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 243.52±1.35 e | 37.33±1.54 c | 85.00±0.58 ab | 2.18±0.07 ab | 70.83±0.76 c | 78.23±0.55 f | 0.91±0.01 a |
| T1 | 278.21±1.03 d | 42.94±0.49 ab | 84.67±0.33 b | 2.18±0.14 ab | 76.42±0.75 a | 82.03±0.29 cd | 0.93±0.01 a |
| T2 | 306.94±5.90 b | 40.14±0.53 bc | 86.67±0.33 ab | 2.04±0.04 bc | 77.67±0.43 a | 83.89±0.95 b | 0.93±0.02 a |
| T3 | 270.17±4.54 d | 40.98±1.34 abc | 86.33±1.86 ab | 2.18±0.11 ab | 72.98±0.96 bc | 79.93±0.89 ef | 0.91±0.01 a |
| T4 | 334.96±2.42 a | 41.83±0.71 ab | 87.33±0.33 a | 1.91±0.08 c | 77.17±0.78 a | 85.86±0.45 a | 0.90±0.01 a |
| T5 | 292.80±2.42 c | 44.01±1.42 a | 85.00±0.58 ab | 2.32±0.03 a | 75.40±0.94 ab | 81.32±0.45 de | 0.93±0.01 a |
| T6 | 307.00±2.14 b | 41.33±1.01 ab | 86.67±0.33 ab | 2.22±0.06 ab | 76.69±0.82 a | 83.28±0.32 bc | 0.92±0.01 a |
| T7 | 271.72±0.80 d | 39.19±1.31 bc | 85.67±0.33 ab | 2.17±0.14 ab | 71.86±0.52 c | 79.25±0.36 f | 0.91±0.01 a |
| T8 | 291.57±2.80 c | 42.63±1.32 ab | 85.33±0.67 ab | 2.30±0.09 a | 73.46±1.20 bc | 81.77±0.56 cd | 0.90±0.01 a |
Table 2 Appearance of Yangguang 1 under different treatments
| 处理 | 单果重/g | 果皮重/g | 可食率/% | 果皮厚度/mm | 果实纵径/mm | 果实横径/mm | 果形指数 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 243.52±1.35 e | 37.33±1.54 c | 85.00±0.58 ab | 2.18±0.07 ab | 70.83±0.76 c | 78.23±0.55 f | 0.91±0.01 a |
| T1 | 278.21±1.03 d | 42.94±0.49 ab | 84.67±0.33 b | 2.18±0.14 ab | 76.42±0.75 a | 82.03±0.29 cd | 0.93±0.01 a |
| T2 | 306.94±5.90 b | 40.14±0.53 bc | 86.67±0.33 ab | 2.04±0.04 bc | 77.67±0.43 a | 83.89±0.95 b | 0.93±0.02 a |
| T3 | 270.17±4.54 d | 40.98±1.34 abc | 86.33±1.86 ab | 2.18±0.11 ab | 72.98±0.96 bc | 79.93±0.89 ef | 0.91±0.01 a |
| T4 | 334.96±2.42 a | 41.83±0.71 ab | 87.33±0.33 a | 1.91±0.08 c | 77.17±0.78 a | 85.86±0.45 a | 0.90±0.01 a |
| T5 | 292.80±2.42 c | 44.01±1.42 a | 85.00±0.58 ab | 2.32±0.03 a | 75.40±0.94 ab | 81.32±0.45 de | 0.93±0.01 a |
| T6 | 307.00±2.14 b | 41.33±1.01 ab | 86.67±0.33 ab | 2.22±0.06 ab | 76.69±0.82 a | 83.28±0.32 bc | 0.92±0.01 a |
| T7 | 271.72±0.80 d | 39.19±1.31 bc | 85.67±0.33 ab | 2.17±0.14 ab | 71.86±0.52 c | 79.25±0.36 f | 0.91±0.01 a |
| T8 | 291.57±2.80 c | 42.63±1.32 ab | 85.33±0.67 ab | 2.30±0.09 a | 73.46±1.20 bc | 81.77±0.56 cd | 0.90±0.01 a |
| 处理 | L* | a* | b* | CCI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 67.84±0.18 a | 4.35±0.07 b | 70.99±0.43 a | 0.88±0.03 b |
| T1 | 65.56±0.30 cd | 1.68±0.08 de | 69.61±0.16 ab | 0.37±0.02 c |
| T2 | 65.70±0.40 cd | 0.09±0.02 f | 70.70±0.66 a | 0.01±0.10 d |
| T3 | 66.06±0.09 bcd | 6.32±0.56 a | 70.71±0.67 a | 1.34±0.10 a |
| T4 | 65.46±0.65 cd | 5.96±0.71 a | 70.28±1.08 a | 1.29±0.12 a |
| T5 | 63.54±0.75 e | 2.60±0.42 cd | 67.53±0.95 b | 0.59±0.09 bc |
| T6 | 64.69±0.51 de | 0.28±0.54 ef | 68.99±0.99 ab | 0.04±0.12 d |
| T7 | 67.49±0.79 ab | 3.99±0.47 bc | 71.52±0.86 a | 0.82±0.08 b |
| T8 | 66.92±0.47 abc | 4.15±0.57 b | 69.96±0.79 ab | 0.87±0.11 b |
Table 3 Color of Yangguang 1 under different treatments
| 处理 | L* | a* | b* | CCI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 67.84±0.18 a | 4.35±0.07 b | 70.99±0.43 a | 0.88±0.03 b |
| T1 | 65.56±0.30 cd | 1.68±0.08 de | 69.61±0.16 ab | 0.37±0.02 c |
| T2 | 65.70±0.40 cd | 0.09±0.02 f | 70.70±0.66 a | 0.01±0.10 d |
| T3 | 66.06±0.09 bcd | 6.32±0.56 a | 70.71±0.67 a | 1.34±0.10 a |
| T4 | 65.46±0.65 cd | 5.96±0.71 a | 70.28±1.08 a | 1.29±0.12 a |
| T5 | 63.54±0.75 e | 2.60±0.42 cd | 67.53±0.95 b | 0.59±0.09 bc |
| T6 | 64.69±0.51 de | 0.28±0.54 ef | 68.99±0.99 ab | 0.04±0.12 d |
| T7 | 67.49±0.79 ab | 3.99±0.47 bc | 71.52±0.86 a | 0.82±0.08 b |
| T8 | 66.92±0.47 abc | 4.15±0.57 b | 69.96±0.79 ab | 0.87±0.11 b |
| 处理 | 可溶性固形物(TSS)含量/% | 可滴定酸(TA)含量/(g·L-1) | 固酸比 | 维生素C含量/(mg·kg-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 11.33±0.23 abc | 7.0±0.3 bc | 16.30±0.37 a | 289.1±11.7 a |
| T1 | 10.47±0.07 d | 6.7±0.2 c | 15.67±0.63 ab | 276.6±19.4 a |
| T2 | 10.47±0.12 d | 6.7±0.1 c | 15.63±0.33 ab | 281.1±14.0 a |
| T3 | 11.77±0.07 a | 7.1±0.2 bc | 16.59±0.34 a | 296.8±22.1 a |
| T4 | 11.53±0.03 ab | 7.3±0.3 abc | 15.91±0.59 ab | 291.2±9.8 a |
| T5 | 11.03±0.30 bc | 7.2±0.1 abc | 15.40±0.48 ab | 290.0±16.3 a |
| T6 | 10.83±0.09 cd | 6.6±0.4 c | 16.58±0.78 a | 303.3±5.7 a |
| T7 | 11.33±0.18 abc | 7.9±0.2 a | 14.30±0.22 b | 299.7±3.4 a |
| T8 | 11.37±0.15 ab | 7.6±0.6 ab | 14.96±0.82 ab | 302.3±7.7 a |
Table 4 Fruit quality of Yangguang 1 under different treatments
| 处理 | 可溶性固形物(TSS)含量/% | 可滴定酸(TA)含量/(g·L-1) | 固酸比 | 维生素C含量/(mg·kg-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 11.33±0.23 abc | 7.0±0.3 bc | 16.30±0.37 a | 289.1±11.7 a |
| T1 | 10.47±0.07 d | 6.7±0.2 c | 15.67±0.63 ab | 276.6±19.4 a |
| T2 | 10.47±0.12 d | 6.7±0.1 c | 15.63±0.33 ab | 281.1±14.0 a |
| T3 | 11.77±0.07 a | 7.1±0.2 bc | 16.59±0.34 a | 296.8±22.1 a |
| T4 | 11.53±0.03 ab | 7.3±0.3 abc | 15.91±0.59 ab | 291.2±9.8 a |
| T5 | 11.03±0.30 bc | 7.2±0.1 abc | 15.40±0.48 ab | 290.0±16.3 a |
| T6 | 10.83±0.09 cd | 6.6±0.4 c | 16.58±0.78 a | 303.3±5.7 a |
| T7 | 11.33±0.18 abc | 7.9±0.2 a | 14.30±0.22 b | 299.7±3.4 a |
| T8 | 11.37±0.15 ab | 7.6±0.6 ab | 14.96±0.82 ab | 302.3±7.7 a |
| 主成分 | 特征值 | 方差贡献率/% | 累计方差贡献率/% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.015 | 33.500 | 33.500 |
| 2 | 2.287 | 25.406 | 58.906 |
| 3 | 1.609 | 17.879 | 76.785 |
| 4 | 1.042 | 11.575 | 88.360 |
| 5 | 0.924 | 10.269 | 98.629 |
| 6 | 0.106 | 1.178 | 99.807 |
| 7 | 0.016 | 0.181 | 99.988 |
| 8 | 0.001 | 0.012 | 100.000 |
Table 5 Eigenvalues,variance contribution rates,and cumulative variance contribution rates of each principal component for different treatments
| 主成分 | 特征值 | 方差贡献率/% | 累计方差贡献率/% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.015 | 33.500 | 33.500 |
| 2 | 2.287 | 25.406 | 58.906 |
| 3 | 1.609 | 17.879 | 76.785 |
| 4 | 1.042 | 11.575 | 88.360 |
| 5 | 0.924 | 10.269 | 98.629 |
| 6 | 0.106 | 1.178 | 99.807 |
| 7 | 0.016 | 0.181 | 99.988 |
| 8 | 0.001 | 0.012 | 100.000 |
| 变量 | 主成分1 | 主成分2 | 主成分3 | 主成分4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 裂果率 | -0.061 | 0.127 | 0.493 | -0.429 |
| 单果重 | -0.254 | 0.466 | -0.333 | 0.283 |
| 可食率 | -0.266 | 0.553 | -0.143 | 0.047 |
| 果皮厚度 | 0.218 | -0.510 | -0.175 | 0.343 |
| CCI | 0.434 | 0.255 | 0.258 | -0.055 |
| TSS含量 | 0.476 | 0.271 | 0.266 | 0.141 |
| TA含量 | 0.483 | 0.179 | -0.292 | -0.278 |
| 固酸比 | -0.209 | 0.014 | 0.607 | 0.501 |
| 维生素C含量 | 0.349 | 0.175 | -0.071 | 0.514 |
Table 6 Eigenvectors of principal components for different treatments
| 变量 | 主成分1 | 主成分2 | 主成分3 | 主成分4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 裂果率 | -0.061 | 0.127 | 0.493 | -0.429 |
| 单果重 | -0.254 | 0.466 | -0.333 | 0.283 |
| 可食率 | -0.266 | 0.553 | -0.143 | 0.047 |
| 果皮厚度 | 0.218 | -0.510 | -0.175 | 0.343 |
| CCI | 0.434 | 0.255 | 0.258 | -0.055 |
| TSS含量 | 0.476 | 0.271 | 0.266 | 0.141 |
| TA含量 | 0.483 | 0.179 | -0.292 | -0.278 |
| 固酸比 | -0.209 | 0.014 | 0.607 | 0.501 |
| 维生素C含量 | 0.349 | 0.175 | -0.071 | 0.514 |
| 处理 | Y1 | Y2 | Y3 | Y4 | Y | 排名 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 0.556 | -1.011 | 2.544 | -1.057 | 0.296 | 5 |
| T1 | -1.570 | -1.939 | -0.375 | -0.515 | -1.296 | 9 |
| T2 | -2.896 | 0.412 | -0.486 | -0.769 | -1.179 | 8 |
| T3 | 1.595 | -0.050 | 1.329 | 1.117 | 1.005 | 1 |
| T4 | -0.302 | 3.454 | 0.325 | -0.265 | 0.910 | 2 |
| T5 | 0.346 | -1.136 | -1.041 | 0.453 | -0.347 | 7 |
| T6 | -1.619 | 0.094 | 0.169 | 1.778 | -0.319 | 6 |
| T7 | 2.033 | 0.307 | -1.222 | -1.207 | 0.454 | 4 |
| T8 | 1.857 | -0.132 | -1.244 | 0.466 | 0.476 | 3 |
Table 7 Principal component scores and rankings of fruit quality of Yangguang 1 under different treatments
| 处理 | Y1 | Y2 | Y3 | Y4 | Y | 排名 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 0.556 | -1.011 | 2.544 | -1.057 | 0.296 | 5 |
| T1 | -1.570 | -1.939 | -0.375 | -0.515 | -1.296 | 9 |
| T2 | -2.896 | 0.412 | -0.486 | -0.769 | -1.179 | 8 |
| T3 | 1.595 | -0.050 | 1.329 | 1.117 | 1.005 | 1 |
| T4 | -0.302 | 3.454 | 0.325 | -0.265 | 0.910 | 2 |
| T5 | 0.346 | -1.136 | -1.041 | 0.453 | -0.347 | 7 |
| T6 | -1.619 | 0.094 | 0.169 | 1.778 | -0.319 | 6 |
| T7 | 2.033 | 0.307 | -1.222 | -1.207 | 0.454 | 4 |
| T8 | 1.857 | -0.132 | -1.244 | 0.466 | 0.476 | 3 |
| [1] | 时静,王文光,戚飞. 柑橘废弃物在食品包装膜中的应用与展望[J]. 热带农业科学,2024,44(11):135-140. |
| [2] | 余克琴,刘襄河,李秋佳,等. 柑橘果实类胡萝卜素代谢研究进展[J]. 中国果树,2024(10):7-13. |
| [3] | 张文龙,万润楚,郑妮,等. 柑橘不育系新品种‘阳光1号’[J]. 园艺学报,2024,51(9):2221-2222. |
| [4] | 童璐,马创举,孙建城,等. 不同栽培设施对‘阳光1号’果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江柑桔,2024,41(2):21-23. |
| [5] | 李彩,彭良志,党江波,等. 高温久旱降雨后不同柑橘品种裂果比较[J]. 中国南方果树,2012,41(1):42-44. |
| [6] | 段朝辉,谭叙平,李论. 如何防治柑橘类水果裂果[J]. 湖南农业,2024(9):10-11. |
| [7] | 叶正文,叶兰香,张学英. “朋娜”等脐橙的裂果规律及赤霉素防裂效果[J]. 上海农业学报,2002,18(4):52-57. |
| [8] | 郑元勋. 授粉和生长调节剂对南部脆香甜柚裂果及果实品质的影响研究[D]. 北京:中国农业科学院,2013. |
| [9] | 黄美菱. 不同处理对甘平裂果的影响研究[J]. 四川农业科技,2024(2):24-26. |
| [10] | 林燕金,卢艳清,卢新坤. 喷施不同矿质元素对度尾文旦柚裂果的影响[J]. 东南园艺,2021,9(6):44-46. |
| [11] | 代琳. 外源赤霉素、氨基酸钙处理对‘明日见’柑橘裂果的影响[J]. 中国农学通报,2024,40(7):49-55. |
| [12] | 罗莎莎,王如月,甄紫怡,等. 采前水分处理对杏李‘风味皇后’裂果及果实品质的影响[J]. 经济林研究,2024,42(2):81-90. |
| [13] | 孙双双,杜晓云,王欢,等. 甜樱桃裂果与果实主要性状的相关性研究[J]. 中国果树,2023(6):26-32. |
| [14] | 朱绍坤,乔军,马丽,等. 外源钙对巨峰葡萄裂果及其代谢物质的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学,2024,52(4):163-168. |
| [15] | 王引,倪海枝,颜帮国,等. 白沙枇杷裂果的钙素调控生理研究[J]. 果树学报,2022,39(5):826-835. |
| [16] | 周秋蓉. Ca+GA3处理对预防芦柑裂果的作用及其机理研究[D]. 福州:福建农林大学,2023. |
| [17] | 徐跃兴. 塔罗科血橙新系裂果成因与调控研究[D]. 北京:中国农业科学院,2010. |
| [18] | 陈骏,刘丽丽,王登亮,等. 生长调节剂和叶面营养对早熟椪柑裂果的防治效果研究[J]. 浙江柑桔,2021,38(4):15-17. |
| [19] | 刘萍,武晓晓,马小萍,等. 不同生长调节剂处理对桂橘一号裂果及果实品质的影响[J]. 南方园艺,2024,35(5):16-19. |
| [20] | 李慧,李百云,魏天军. 以色列叶面肥和赤霉素对同心圆枣坐果率及产量的影响[J]. 宁夏农林科技,2016,57(4):24-26. |
| [21] | 陈棕林,周岐伟,崔芸瑜,等. 植物生长调节剂处理对金弹类金柑幼果生长发育的影响[J]. 中国南方果树,2023,52(6):14-19. |
| [22] | 刘昔,江帮富,杨俊. 三种植物生长调节剂促进柑橘增产效果比较[J]. 四川农业科技,2019(11):28-30. |
| [23] | 姚瑞赟,白茹,于庆帆,等. 基于主成分分析法研究不同植物生长调节剂对苹果果实品质的影响[J]. 黑龙江农业科学,2023(3):56-63. |
| [1] | HAO Wanjun, WU Zaogui, HE Weijun. Analysis of current status and quality improvement strategies of seed quality in Zhejiang Province [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(9): 2105-2108. |
| [2] | ZHAO Haiying, LI Gexing, GU Mengxuan, FENG Daqing, YU Guilong, ZHANG Qiang, LIU Xiangchen, FU Qiang, LIU Yali. Effects of different seedling raising agents on seedling vigor and stress resistance of ratoon rice under early spring low-temperature stress in southern Henan rice region [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(9): 2113-2118. |
| [3] | ZHU Zhizhong, GE Zixuan, DUAN Weidong, WANG Xinzhong, GUO Fangyang, WU Zhaohui, XU Wenzheng. Effects of organic fertilizer formulations on oil content,yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco leaves [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(9): 2143-2148. |
| [4] | LI Peiyan, WEI Yuewei, XU Shizhen, LI Yanzhou, YIN Quanyu, REN Tianbao, GENG Zongze, LIU Guoshun. Distribution characteristics of chemical components and quality traits in different leaf zones of tobacco based on fractal theory [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(9): 2149-2156. |
| [5] | SUN Li, WANG Rong, ZHANG Shuwen, YU Zheping, ZHANG Yang, QU Jing, ZHANG Qi. Effects of calcium and boron on fruit quality and storage tolerance of Chinese bayberry [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(9): 2163-2167. |
| [6] | YE Xiongfang, CHEN Ke, HE Dongping, RONG Song, XIANG Tao, GU Likai, YU Yongqi, FAN Anli, YANG Zhe, ZHANG Yulong, WANG Huaying. Comparative study of six taste-oriented tomato varieties under greenhouse substrate cultivation [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(9): 2172-2176. |
| [7] | FAN Mingliang, FENG Kongjun, ZHOU Kaile, YANG Shuai, HE Bing, ZHOU Yong, PAN Feiyun, ZHENG Lin, LAN Liyan, FU Ruijie, DAI Fen. Effects of chemical fertilizer replacement by bio-nano-selenium fertilizer on fruit quality of Hongmeiren citrus and soil nutrients [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(9): 2183-2186. |
| [8] | WANG Lili, ZHU Shijun. Effects of Trichoderma microbial agent on grape quality,yield and soil microorganisms [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(9): 2193-2195. |
| [9] | YANG Jifeng, WU Yong, FU Linhua, GUO Kefan, JIANG Qinghua, HUANG Fuyong, TANG Jinyu, JIN Jingzhong. Study and application of key breeding technologies for Whitmania pigra based on analysis of aquatic microorganisms [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(8): 1860-1864. |
| [10] | YANG Yu, FU Jun, DENG Honglin, DENG Tao, WAN Yuting, SUN Bo. Evaluation of tropical adaptability of agronomic and quality traits in fresh maize [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(8): 1928-1932. |
| [11] | WANG Xueying, XU Jingnian, XUE Lin, ZHU Qifa, TANG Jingxiang, ZHU Junjun, MAO Dongping, YIN Long, REN Sihai. Effects of different types of rapeseed-derived organic materials on the growth and leaf quality of flue-cured tobacco [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(8): 1933-1939. |
| [12] | HE Weijun, ZHENG Ting, CHENG Jianhui. Technical specifications for high-quality cultivation of spine grape in Zhejiang Province [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(8): 1945-1948. |
| [13] | LIU Xueping, GU Zhaoshuai, WANG Jing, GAO Fei, ZHAO Li, LIU Yan, XU Minghua, LI Jihui. Comparison of quality characteristics of hawthorn leaves from different varieties at different stages [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(8): 1961-1965. |
| [14] | JIANG Lijun, ZHU Shenghu, JI Yongjin, LIU Zifei, JIN Guangchun, SUN Xiuhui. The foundation,logic,and path of the development of new quality productive forces in fisheries under the goal of modernization [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(8): 2045-2054. |
| [15] | SHENG Yueyue, ZOU Wenxiong, ZHU Wei, CHEN Xiaoyang. Analysis of crop seed quality in Zhejiang Province during the 14 th Five-Year Plan and improvement strategies [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(7): 1581-1586. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||