
Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2026, Vol. 67 ›› Issue (8): 1933-1939.DOI: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20250233
Previous Articles Next Articles
WANG Xueying1,2(
), XU Jingnian2, XUE Lin1, ZHU Qifa1, TANG Jingxiang2, ZHU Junjun2, MAO Dongping1, YIN Long1, REN Sihai2(
)
Received:2025-03-26
Online:2026-08-11
Published:2026-08-20
Contact:
REN Sihai
CLC Number:
WANG Xueying, XU Jingnian, XUE Lin, ZHU Qifa, TANG Jingxiang, ZHU Junjun, MAO Dongping, YIN Long, REN Sihai. Effects of different types of rapeseed-derived organic materials on the growth and leaf quality of flue-cured tobacco[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(8): 1933-1939.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnykx.cn/EN/10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20250233
| 试验点 | pH值 | 有机质含量/(g·kg-1) | 速效氮含量/(mg·kg-1) | 速效磷含量/(mg·kg-1) | 速效钾含量/(mg·kg-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.97 | 20.2 | 167.65 | 28.38 | 90.39 |
| 2 | 5.04 | 19.6 | 123.07 | 20.08 | 155.08 |
Table 1 Basic information of soil
| 试验点 | pH值 | 有机质含量/(g·kg-1) | 速效氮含量/(mg·kg-1) | 速效磷含量/(mg·kg-1) | 速效钾含量/(mg·kg-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.97 | 20.2 | 167.65 | 28.38 | 90.39 |
| 2 | 5.04 | 19.6 | 123.07 | 20.08 | 155.08 |
| 试验点 | 处理 | 有效叶片数 | 株高/cm | 茎围/mm | 最大中部叶长/cm | 最大中部叶宽/cm | 最大上部叶长/cm | 最大上部叶宽/cm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CK | 13.07 a | 104.84 ab | 100.37 abc | 65.87 a | 24.99 a | 62.26 bc | 17.31 b |
| T1 | 13.07 a | 105.17 ab | 98.93 bc | 64.06 a | 26.97 a | 61.94 c | 17.31 b | |
| T2 | 12.53 a | 102.77 b | 96.38 c | 63.35 a | 24.79 a | 62.63 bc | 17.83 ab | |
| T3 | 13.40 a | 110.72 a | 104.47 a | 66.95 a | 27.87 a | 65.87 ab | 18.94 ab | |
| T4 | 12.53 a | 109.47 ab | 101.13 abc | 64.40 a | 25.79 a | 63.93 abc | 18.43 ab | |
| T5 | 12.27 a | 107.58 ab | 104.33 a | 68.08 a | 27.70 a | 66.38 a | 19.96 a | |
| T6 | 12.93 a | 108.06 ab | 101.93 ab | 66.29 a | 26.07 a | 65.29 abc | 18.23 ab | |
| 2 | CK | 10.80 b | 102.05 bc | 99.80 b | 67.67 a | 27.49 a | 64.32 a | 20.55 a |
| T1 | 12.07 a | 106.17 abc | 99.60 b | 67.66 a | 28.52 a | 62.27 a | 19.03 a | |
| T2 | 11.00 ab | 100.76 c | 99.47 b | 67.93 a | 26.85 a | 65.93 a | 21.23 a | |
| T3 | 12.20 a | 111.07 a | 104.80 a | 71.64 a | 29.17 a | 67.97 a | 21.13 a | |
| T4 | 11.27 ab | 109.49 ab | 101.40 ab | 69.95 a | 28.88 a | 67.39 a | 21.73 a | |
| T5 | 11.27 ab | 100.52 c | 99.67 b | 70.19 a | 27.63 a | 65.49 a | 20.41 a | |
| T6 | 11.93 ab | 101.83 bc | 100.47 ab | 69.63 a | 25.70 a | 65.85 a | 20.09 a |
Table 2 Agronomic traits of tobacco plants under different treatments
| 试验点 | 处理 | 有效叶片数 | 株高/cm | 茎围/mm | 最大中部叶长/cm | 最大中部叶宽/cm | 最大上部叶长/cm | 最大上部叶宽/cm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CK | 13.07 a | 104.84 ab | 100.37 abc | 65.87 a | 24.99 a | 62.26 bc | 17.31 b |
| T1 | 13.07 a | 105.17 ab | 98.93 bc | 64.06 a | 26.97 a | 61.94 c | 17.31 b | |
| T2 | 12.53 a | 102.77 b | 96.38 c | 63.35 a | 24.79 a | 62.63 bc | 17.83 ab | |
| T3 | 13.40 a | 110.72 a | 104.47 a | 66.95 a | 27.87 a | 65.87 ab | 18.94 ab | |
| T4 | 12.53 a | 109.47 ab | 101.13 abc | 64.40 a | 25.79 a | 63.93 abc | 18.43 ab | |
| T5 | 12.27 a | 107.58 ab | 104.33 a | 68.08 a | 27.70 a | 66.38 a | 19.96 a | |
| T6 | 12.93 a | 108.06 ab | 101.93 ab | 66.29 a | 26.07 a | 65.29 abc | 18.23 ab | |
| 2 | CK | 10.80 b | 102.05 bc | 99.80 b | 67.67 a | 27.49 a | 64.32 a | 20.55 a |
| T1 | 12.07 a | 106.17 abc | 99.60 b | 67.66 a | 28.52 a | 62.27 a | 19.03 a | |
| T2 | 11.00 ab | 100.76 c | 99.47 b | 67.93 a | 26.85 a | 65.93 a | 21.23 a | |
| T3 | 12.20 a | 111.07 a | 104.80 a | 71.64 a | 29.17 a | 67.97 a | 21.13 a | |
| T4 | 11.27 ab | 109.49 ab | 101.40 ab | 69.95 a | 28.88 a | 67.39 a | 21.73 a | |
| T5 | 11.27 ab | 100.52 c | 99.67 b | 70.19 a | 27.63 a | 65.49 a | 20.41 a | |
| T6 | 11.93 ab | 101.83 bc | 100.47 ab | 69.63 a | 25.70 a | 65.85 a | 20.09 a |
| 试验点 | 处理 | 均价/(元·kg-1) | 上等烟比例/% | 中等烟比例/% | 667 m2产量/kg | 667 m2产值/元 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CK | 28.71 bcd | 49.87 bcd | 47.22 abc | 128.30 b | 3 695.35 ab |
| T1 | 30.03 abc | 57.01 abc | 42.99 bc | 126.86 b | 3 811.76 ab | |
| T2 | 28.59 cd | 46.36 cd | 51.04 ab | 125.13 b | 3 573.81 b | |
| T3 | 27.97 d | 41.57 d | 56.76 a | 143.95 a | 4 027.08 ab | |
| T4 | 30.87 a | 63.75 a | 35.30 c | 132.52 ab | 4 092.72 a | |
| T5 | 30.52 ab | 61.41 ab | 37.41 c | 125.42 b | 3 830.32 ab | |
| T6 | 30.34 abc | 60.10 abc | 36.39 c | 126.39 b | 3 826.55 ab | |
| 2 | CK | 31.61 a | 67.68 a | 29.97 a | 135.23 a | 4 273.70 a |
| T1 | 30.63 a | 62.63 a | 35.18 a | 134.20 a | 4 111.33 a | |
| T2 | 30.17 a | 55.45 a | 40.53 a | 131.78 a | 3 976.72 a | |
| T3 | 31.17 a | 65.11 a | 32.88 a | 141.95 a | 4 423.26 a | |
| T4 | 31.30 a | 57.85 a | 40.12 a | 136.42 a | 4 269.95 a | |
| T5 | 30.40 a | 61.60 a | 34.29 a | 126.79 a | 3 847.62 a | |
| T6 | 30.78 a | 64.80 a | 31.45 a | 124.39 a | 3 833.75 a |
Table 3 Effects of different treatments on economic traits of flue-cured tobacco
| 试验点 | 处理 | 均价/(元·kg-1) | 上等烟比例/% | 中等烟比例/% | 667 m2产量/kg | 667 m2产值/元 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CK | 28.71 bcd | 49.87 bcd | 47.22 abc | 128.30 b | 3 695.35 ab |
| T1 | 30.03 abc | 57.01 abc | 42.99 bc | 126.86 b | 3 811.76 ab | |
| T2 | 28.59 cd | 46.36 cd | 51.04 ab | 125.13 b | 3 573.81 b | |
| T3 | 27.97 d | 41.57 d | 56.76 a | 143.95 a | 4 027.08 ab | |
| T4 | 30.87 a | 63.75 a | 35.30 c | 132.52 ab | 4 092.72 a | |
| T5 | 30.52 ab | 61.41 ab | 37.41 c | 125.42 b | 3 830.32 ab | |
| T6 | 30.34 abc | 60.10 abc | 36.39 c | 126.39 b | 3 826.55 ab | |
| 2 | CK | 31.61 a | 67.68 a | 29.97 a | 135.23 a | 4 273.70 a |
| T1 | 30.63 a | 62.63 a | 35.18 a | 134.20 a | 4 111.33 a | |
| T2 | 30.17 a | 55.45 a | 40.53 a | 131.78 a | 3 976.72 a | |
| T3 | 31.17 a | 65.11 a | 32.88 a | 141.95 a | 4 423.26 a | |
| T4 | 31.30 a | 57.85 a | 40.12 a | 136.42 a | 4 269.95 a | |
| T5 | 30.40 a | 61.60 a | 34.29 a | 126.79 a | 3 847.62 a | |
| T6 | 30.78 a | 64.80 a | 31.45 a | 124.39 a | 3 833.75 a |
| 试验点 | 处理 | 得分 | 总得分 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 颜色 | 成熟度 | 身份 | 叶片结构 | 油分 | 色度 | |||
| 1 | CK | 8.07 a | 8.17 a | 7.67 a | 7.67 b | 5.83 ab | 5.67 ab | 7.28 ab |
| T1 | 7.67 b | 7.50 c | 8.00 a | 6.83 c | 5.50 b | 5.23 b | 6.92 c | |
| T2 | 8.00 ab | 8.00 ab | 7.83 a | 8.00 ab | 6.10 ab | 5.57 ab | 7.32 ab | |
| T3 | 8.23 a | 8.17 a | 8.10 a | 8.17 a | 6.33 a | 6.00 a | 7.56 a | |
| T4 | 8.17 a | 8.10 ab | 8.00 a | 8.10 ab | 6.00 ab | 5.67 ab | 7.41 a | |
| T5 | 8.00 ab | 7.73 bc | 7.60 a | 7.60 b | 5.60 b | 5.40 ab | 7.06 bc | |
| T6 | 8.07 a | 8.07 ab | 7.67 a | 7.87 ab | 5.83 ab | 5.67 ab | 7.27 ab | |
| 2 | CK | 7.63 a | 7.10 a | 7.63 a | 7.00 a | 5.07 a | 4.73 a | 6.62 a |
| T1 | 8.00 a | 7.57 a | 7.77 a | 7.23 a | 5.53 a | 4.50 a | 6.87 a | |
| T2 | 8.03 a | 7.57 a | 7.90 a | 7.40 a | 5.67 a | 4.93 a | 7.01 a | |
| T3 | 8.07 a | 7.67 a | 8.10 a | 7.77 a | 5.77 a | 5.33 a | 7.19 a | |
| T4 | 7.60 a | 7.40 a | 7.90 a | 7.23 a | 5.37 a | 4.67 a | 6.80 a | |
| T5 | 7.63 a | 7.17 a | 7.77 a | 7.07 a | 5.33 a | 4.83 a | 6.72 a | |
| T6 | 8.07 a | 7.77 a | 7.70 a | 7.43 a | 5.70 a | 5.30 a | 7.09 a | |
Table 4 Appearance quality scores of flue-cured middle leaves under different treatments
| 试验点 | 处理 | 得分 | 总得分 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 颜色 | 成熟度 | 身份 | 叶片结构 | 油分 | 色度 | |||
| 1 | CK | 8.07 a | 8.17 a | 7.67 a | 7.67 b | 5.83 ab | 5.67 ab | 7.28 ab |
| T1 | 7.67 b | 7.50 c | 8.00 a | 6.83 c | 5.50 b | 5.23 b | 6.92 c | |
| T2 | 8.00 ab | 8.00 ab | 7.83 a | 8.00 ab | 6.10 ab | 5.57 ab | 7.32 ab | |
| T3 | 8.23 a | 8.17 a | 8.10 a | 8.17 a | 6.33 a | 6.00 a | 7.56 a | |
| T4 | 8.17 a | 8.10 ab | 8.00 a | 8.10 ab | 6.00 ab | 5.67 ab | 7.41 a | |
| T5 | 8.00 ab | 7.73 bc | 7.60 a | 7.60 b | 5.60 b | 5.40 ab | 7.06 bc | |
| T6 | 8.07 a | 8.07 ab | 7.67 a | 7.87 ab | 5.83 ab | 5.67 ab | 7.27 ab | |
| 2 | CK | 7.63 a | 7.10 a | 7.63 a | 7.00 a | 5.07 a | 4.73 a | 6.62 a |
| T1 | 8.00 a | 7.57 a | 7.77 a | 7.23 a | 5.53 a | 4.50 a | 6.87 a | |
| T2 | 8.03 a | 7.57 a | 7.90 a | 7.40 a | 5.67 a | 4.93 a | 7.01 a | |
| T3 | 8.07 a | 7.67 a | 8.10 a | 7.77 a | 5.77 a | 5.33 a | 7.19 a | |
| T4 | 7.60 a | 7.40 a | 7.90 a | 7.23 a | 5.37 a | 4.67 a | 6.80 a | |
| T5 | 7.63 a | 7.17 a | 7.77 a | 7.07 a | 5.33 a | 4.83 a | 6.72 a | |
| T6 | 8.07 a | 7.77 a | 7.70 a | 7.43 a | 5.70 a | 5.30 a | 7.09 a | |
| 试验点 | 处理 | 得分 | 总得分 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 颜色 | 成熟度 | 身份 | 叶片结构 | 油分 | 色度 | |||
| 1 | CK | 8.10 b | 7.83 c | 5.50 b | 5.07 a | 5.47 b | 5.53 bc | 6.43 c |
| T1 | 8.60 a | 8.60 a | 6.33 a | 5.93 a | 6.40 a | 6.43 a | 7.22 a | |
| T2 | 8.60 a | 8.30 abc | 6.20 a | 5.60 a | 6.40 a | 6.10 abc | 7.04 ab | |
| T3 | 8.47 ab | 8.43 ab | 6.30 a | 5.90 a | 6.03 ab | 6.03 abc | 7.04 ab | |
| T4 | 8.57 a | 8.60 a | 6.13 ab | 5.87 a | 6.33 a | 6.33 ab | 7.15 ab | |
| T5 | 8.27 ab | 8.00 bc | 5.77 ab | 5.17 a | 6.03 ab | 5.40 c | 6.63 bc | |
| T6 | 8.50 ab | 8.27 abc | 6.00 ab | 5.80 a | 6.27 a | 6.27 ab | 7.00 ab | |
| 2 | CK | 7.70 b | 7.67 a | 5.40 a | 3.83 b | 5.07 b | 4.67 b | 6.00 b |
| T1 | 8.40 ab | 7.93 a | 5.77 a | 4.70 ab | 5.87 ab | 5.77 ab | 6.61 ab | |
| T2 | 8.33 ab | 8.27 a | 5.80 a | 4.80 ab | 5.70 ab | 5.47 ab | 6.63 ab | |
| T3 | 8.20 ab | 7.93 a | 5.60 a | 4.43 ab | 5.60 ab | 5.40 ab | 6.43 ab | |
| T4 | 8.27 ab | 8.17 a | 5.87 a | 4.83 ab | 6.00 a | 5.50 ab | 6.57 ab | |
| T5 | 8.00 ab | 8.07 a | 5.73 a | 4.60 ab | 5.87 ab | 5.37 ab | 6.51 ab | |
| T6 | 8.63 a | 8.43 a | 6.33 a | 5.27 a | 6.33 a | 5.93 a | 7.03 a | |
Table 5 Appearance quality scores of flue-cured upper leaves under different treatments
| 试验点 | 处理 | 得分 | 总得分 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 颜色 | 成熟度 | 身份 | 叶片结构 | 油分 | 色度 | |||
| 1 | CK | 8.10 b | 7.83 c | 5.50 b | 5.07 a | 5.47 b | 5.53 bc | 6.43 c |
| T1 | 8.60 a | 8.60 a | 6.33 a | 5.93 a | 6.40 a | 6.43 a | 7.22 a | |
| T2 | 8.60 a | 8.30 abc | 6.20 a | 5.60 a | 6.40 a | 6.10 abc | 7.04 ab | |
| T3 | 8.47 ab | 8.43 ab | 6.30 a | 5.90 a | 6.03 ab | 6.03 abc | 7.04 ab | |
| T4 | 8.57 a | 8.60 a | 6.13 ab | 5.87 a | 6.33 a | 6.33 ab | 7.15 ab | |
| T5 | 8.27 ab | 8.00 bc | 5.77 ab | 5.17 a | 6.03 ab | 5.40 c | 6.63 bc | |
| T6 | 8.50 ab | 8.27 abc | 6.00 ab | 5.80 a | 6.27 a | 6.27 ab | 7.00 ab | |
| 2 | CK | 7.70 b | 7.67 a | 5.40 a | 3.83 b | 5.07 b | 4.67 b | 6.00 b |
| T1 | 8.40 ab | 7.93 a | 5.77 a | 4.70 ab | 5.87 ab | 5.77 ab | 6.61 ab | |
| T2 | 8.33 ab | 8.27 a | 5.80 a | 4.80 ab | 5.70 ab | 5.47 ab | 6.63 ab | |
| T3 | 8.20 ab | 7.93 a | 5.60 a | 4.43 ab | 5.60 ab | 5.40 ab | 6.43 ab | |
| T4 | 8.27 ab | 8.17 a | 5.87 a | 4.83 ab | 6.00 a | 5.50 ab | 6.57 ab | |
| T5 | 8.00 ab | 8.07 a | 5.73 a | 4.60 ab | 5.87 ab | 5.37 ab | 6.51 ab | |
| T6 | 8.63 a | 8.43 a | 6.33 a | 5.27 a | 6.33 a | 5.93 a | 7.03 a | |
| 试验点 | 处理 | 总糖 含量/% | 还原糖 含量/% | 全氮 含量/% | 烟碱 含量/% | 全钾 含量/% | 氯离子 含量/% | 石油醚提取物含量/% | 全磷 含量/% | 糖碱比 | 氮碱比 | 两糖比 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CK | 27.58 a | 23.77 a | 1.60 ab | 2.13 ab | 2.77 ab | 0.56 ab | 6.05 a | 0.81 a | 11.92 ab | 0.76 ab | 0.86 ab |
| T1 | 33.37 a | 26.24 a | 1.42 b | 1.66 ab | 2.41 b | 0.42 b | 6.15 a | 0.86 a | 15.82 ab | 0.86 ab | 0.79 c | |
| T2 | 29.68 a | 24.38 a | 1.45 b | 1.88 ab | 2.62 ab | 0.49 ab | 6.51 a | 0.88 a | 13.94 ab | 0.79 ab | 0.83 abc | |
| T3 | 26.57 a | 22.83 a | 1.50 b | 2.32 a | 2.83 ab | 0.61 ab | 6.72 a | 0.88 a | 9.91 b | 0.65 b | 0.86 ab | |
| T4 | 27.23 a | 24.23 a | 1.77 a | 2.31 ab | 2.92 a | 0.59 ab | 6.57 a | 0.86 a | 10.50 ab | 0.77 ab | 0.89 a | |
| T5 | 33.50 a | 26.65 a | 1.46 b | 1.54 b | 2.68 ab | 0.52 ab | 5.78 a | 0.76 a | 19.76 a | 0.95 a | 0.80 bc | |
| T6 | 30.43 a | 25.40 a | 1.51 ab | 1.77 ab | 2.83 ab | 0.64 a | 6.76 a | 0.78 a | 15.72 ab | 0.88 ab | 0.84 abc | |
| 2 | CK | 30.42 a | 27.03 a | 1.57 a | 2.09 a | 3.16 a | 0.53 a | 5.65 a | 0.77 a | 13.29 a | 0.75 a | 0.89 a |
| T1 | 30.14 a | 26.26 a | 1.57 a | 1.73 a | 2.96 a | 0.47 a | 5.79 a | 0.83 a | 16.48 a | 0.93 a | 0.88 a | |
| T2 | 30.74 a | 26.71 a | 1.64 a | 1.75 a | 3.14 a | 0.38 a | 5.34 a | 0.80 a | 16.10 a | 0.98 a | 0.87 a | |
| T3 | 27.97 a | 24.53 a | 1.61 a | 2.13 a | 3.13 a | 0.47 a | 6.13 a | 0.77 a | 13.22 a | 0.79 a | 0.89 a | |
| T4 | 31.48 a | 26.50 a | 1.44 a | 1.71 a | 2.99 a | 0.52 a | 5.76 a | 0.79 a | 16.66 a | 0.86 a | 0.85 a | |
| T5 | 35.17 a | 28.05 a | 1.37 a | 1.62 a | 2.95 a | 0.52 a | 5.69 a | 0.71 a | 17.71 a | 0.86 a | 0.80 a | |
| T6 | 30.21 a | 25.90 a | 1.67 a | 1.90 a | 3.01 a | 0.52 a | 6.29 a | 0.80 a | 14.89 a | 0.92 a | 0.87 a |
Table 6 Chemical components of flue-cured middle leaves under different treatments
| 试验点 | 处理 | 总糖 含量/% | 还原糖 含量/% | 全氮 含量/% | 烟碱 含量/% | 全钾 含量/% | 氯离子 含量/% | 石油醚提取物含量/% | 全磷 含量/% | 糖碱比 | 氮碱比 | 两糖比 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CK | 27.58 a | 23.77 a | 1.60 ab | 2.13 ab | 2.77 ab | 0.56 ab | 6.05 a | 0.81 a | 11.92 ab | 0.76 ab | 0.86 ab |
| T1 | 33.37 a | 26.24 a | 1.42 b | 1.66 ab | 2.41 b | 0.42 b | 6.15 a | 0.86 a | 15.82 ab | 0.86 ab | 0.79 c | |
| T2 | 29.68 a | 24.38 a | 1.45 b | 1.88 ab | 2.62 ab | 0.49 ab | 6.51 a | 0.88 a | 13.94 ab | 0.79 ab | 0.83 abc | |
| T3 | 26.57 a | 22.83 a | 1.50 b | 2.32 a | 2.83 ab | 0.61 ab | 6.72 a | 0.88 a | 9.91 b | 0.65 b | 0.86 ab | |
| T4 | 27.23 a | 24.23 a | 1.77 a | 2.31 ab | 2.92 a | 0.59 ab | 6.57 a | 0.86 a | 10.50 ab | 0.77 ab | 0.89 a | |
| T5 | 33.50 a | 26.65 a | 1.46 b | 1.54 b | 2.68 ab | 0.52 ab | 5.78 a | 0.76 a | 19.76 a | 0.95 a | 0.80 bc | |
| T6 | 30.43 a | 25.40 a | 1.51 ab | 1.77 ab | 2.83 ab | 0.64 a | 6.76 a | 0.78 a | 15.72 ab | 0.88 ab | 0.84 abc | |
| 2 | CK | 30.42 a | 27.03 a | 1.57 a | 2.09 a | 3.16 a | 0.53 a | 5.65 a | 0.77 a | 13.29 a | 0.75 a | 0.89 a |
| T1 | 30.14 a | 26.26 a | 1.57 a | 1.73 a | 2.96 a | 0.47 a | 5.79 a | 0.83 a | 16.48 a | 0.93 a | 0.88 a | |
| T2 | 30.74 a | 26.71 a | 1.64 a | 1.75 a | 3.14 a | 0.38 a | 5.34 a | 0.80 a | 16.10 a | 0.98 a | 0.87 a | |
| T3 | 27.97 a | 24.53 a | 1.61 a | 2.13 a | 3.13 a | 0.47 a | 6.13 a | 0.77 a | 13.22 a | 0.79 a | 0.89 a | |
| T4 | 31.48 a | 26.50 a | 1.44 a | 1.71 a | 2.99 a | 0.52 a | 5.76 a | 0.79 a | 16.66 a | 0.86 a | 0.85 a | |
| T5 | 35.17 a | 28.05 a | 1.37 a | 1.62 a | 2.95 a | 0.52 a | 5.69 a | 0.71 a | 17.71 a | 0.86 a | 0.80 a | |
| T6 | 30.21 a | 25.90 a | 1.67 a | 1.90 a | 3.01 a | 0.52 a | 6.29 a | 0.80 a | 14.89 a | 0.92 a | 0.87 a |
| 试验点 | 处理 | 总糖 含量/% | 还原糖 含量/% | 全氮 含量/% | 烟碱 含量/% | 全钾 含量/% | 氯离子 含量/% | 石油醚提取物含量/% | 全磷 含量/% | 糖碱比 | 氮碱比 | 两糖比 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CK | 23.21 a | 20.30 a | 1.85 a | 2.95 a | 2.88 a | 0.70 a | 6.22 a | 0.84 a | 7.03 b | 0.63 b | 0.88 a |
| T1 | 24.88 a | 21.89 a | 1.71 a | 2.69 ab | 2.69 ab | 0.64 a | 6.04 a | 0.91 a | 8.16 ab | 0.64 b | 0.88 a | |
| T2 | 25.66 a | 22.83 a | 1.98 a | 2.37 b | 2.49 b | 0.65 a | 6.33 a | 0.86 a | 9.97 a | 0.88 a | 0.89 a | |
| T3 | 25.21 a | 22.23 a | 1.74 a | 2.79 ab | 2.67 ab | 0.57 a | 7.00 a | 0.80 a | 8.06 ab | 0.62 b | 0.88 a | |
| T4 | 26.13 a | 22.69 a | 1.77 a | 2.65 ab | 2.54 ab | 0.59 a | 7.28 a | 0.80 a | 8.59 ab | 0.67 ab | 0.87 a | |
| T5 | 24.47 a | 21.19 a | 1.76 a | 2.74 ab | 2.86 ab | 0.66 a | 6.91 a | 0.82 a | 7.78 ab | 0.64 b | 0.87 a | |
| T6 | 25.61 a | 22.46 a | 1.83 a | 2.80 ab | 2.64 ab | 0.64 a | 6.61 a | 0.88 a | 8.11 ab | 0.66 b | 0.88 a | |
| 2 | CK | 19.62 a | 17.98 a | 1.68 b | 3.24 a | 2.74 c | 0.46 b | 6.78 a | 0.75 a | 5.60 a | 0.52 b | 0.91 a |
| T1 | 19.57 a | 17.84 a | 1.74 b | 2.95 a | 2.81 b | 0.49 b | 7.48 a | 0.82 a | 6.12 a | 0.59 ab | 0.91 a | |
| T2 | 20.05 a | 18.45 a | 2.05 a | 3.19 a | 2.92 ab | 0.50 ab | 7.17 a | 0.85 a | 6.01 a | 0.65 a | 0.92 a | |
| T3 | 18.21 a | 16.57 a | 1.85 ab | 3.29 a | 2.82 b | 0.47 b | 7.83 a | 0.76 a | 5.12 a | 0.56 ab | 0.91 a | |
| T4 | 18.05 a | 16.57 a | 1.65 b | 3.28 a | 3.02 ab | 0.54 ab | 7.70 a | 0.79 a | 5.21 a | 0.51 b | 0.92 a | |
| T5 | 20.44 a | 18.43 a | 1.73 b | 2.83 a | 3.26 a | 0.67 a | 6.48 a | 0.77 a | 7.08 a | 0.63 ab | 0.90 a | |
| T6 | 22.04 a | 20.37 a | 1.80 ab | 2.91 a | 3.16 ab | 0.67 a | 6.78 a | 0.82 a | 7.17 a | 0.62 ab | 0.92 a |
Table 7 Chemical components of flue-cured upper leaves under different treatments
| 试验点 | 处理 | 总糖 含量/% | 还原糖 含量/% | 全氮 含量/% | 烟碱 含量/% | 全钾 含量/% | 氯离子 含量/% | 石油醚提取物含量/% | 全磷 含量/% | 糖碱比 | 氮碱比 | 两糖比 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CK | 23.21 a | 20.30 a | 1.85 a | 2.95 a | 2.88 a | 0.70 a | 6.22 a | 0.84 a | 7.03 b | 0.63 b | 0.88 a |
| T1 | 24.88 a | 21.89 a | 1.71 a | 2.69 ab | 2.69 ab | 0.64 a | 6.04 a | 0.91 a | 8.16 ab | 0.64 b | 0.88 a | |
| T2 | 25.66 a | 22.83 a | 1.98 a | 2.37 b | 2.49 b | 0.65 a | 6.33 a | 0.86 a | 9.97 a | 0.88 a | 0.89 a | |
| T3 | 25.21 a | 22.23 a | 1.74 a | 2.79 ab | 2.67 ab | 0.57 a | 7.00 a | 0.80 a | 8.06 ab | 0.62 b | 0.88 a | |
| T4 | 26.13 a | 22.69 a | 1.77 a | 2.65 ab | 2.54 ab | 0.59 a | 7.28 a | 0.80 a | 8.59 ab | 0.67 ab | 0.87 a | |
| T5 | 24.47 a | 21.19 a | 1.76 a | 2.74 ab | 2.86 ab | 0.66 a | 6.91 a | 0.82 a | 7.78 ab | 0.64 b | 0.87 a | |
| T6 | 25.61 a | 22.46 a | 1.83 a | 2.80 ab | 2.64 ab | 0.64 a | 6.61 a | 0.88 a | 8.11 ab | 0.66 b | 0.88 a | |
| 2 | CK | 19.62 a | 17.98 a | 1.68 b | 3.24 a | 2.74 c | 0.46 b | 6.78 a | 0.75 a | 5.60 a | 0.52 b | 0.91 a |
| T1 | 19.57 a | 17.84 a | 1.74 b | 2.95 a | 2.81 b | 0.49 b | 7.48 a | 0.82 a | 6.12 a | 0.59 ab | 0.91 a | |
| T2 | 20.05 a | 18.45 a | 2.05 a | 3.19 a | 2.92 ab | 0.50 ab | 7.17 a | 0.85 a | 6.01 a | 0.65 a | 0.92 a | |
| T3 | 18.21 a | 16.57 a | 1.85 ab | 3.29 a | 2.82 b | 0.47 b | 7.83 a | 0.76 a | 5.12 a | 0.56 ab | 0.91 a | |
| T4 | 18.05 a | 16.57 a | 1.65 b | 3.28 a | 3.02 ab | 0.54 ab | 7.70 a | 0.79 a | 5.21 a | 0.51 b | 0.92 a | |
| T5 | 20.44 a | 18.43 a | 1.73 b | 2.83 a | 3.26 a | 0.67 a | 6.48 a | 0.77 a | 7.08 a | 0.63 ab | 0.90 a | |
| T6 | 22.04 a | 20.37 a | 1.80 ab | 2.91 a | 3.16 ab | 0.67 a | 6.78 a | 0.82 a | 7.17 a | 0.62 ab | 0.92 a |
| [1] | 孙书斌,程廷明,王家洲,等. 不同用量腐熟菜籽对烟株长势及烟叶油分的影响[J]. 安徽农学通报,2020,26(23):81-83. |
| [2] | 易建华,张新要,李天福,等. 不同有机质土壤饼肥用量对烤烟产量和质量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报,2006,22(10):216-220. |
| [3] | 李孝刚,彭曙光,靳志丽,等. 有机物料对植烟土壤氮素矿化及微生物性质的影响[J]. 土壤学报,2021,58(1):225-234. |
| [4] | 朱经伟,彭友,李志宏,等. 配施菜籽饼对贵州省烟叶氮素和烟碱累积的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料,2016(2):120-125. |
| [5] | 梁洪涛,李莉,孙明辉,等. 菜籽饼肥对漯河烟叶化学成分及其感官质量的影响[J]. 江西农业学报,2015,27(2):71-73. |
| [6] | 夏勇. 施用菜籽饼肥对烟叶产量和质量的影响[J]. 安徽农学通报,2009,15(16):68-69. |
| [7] | 陈剑晖,肖金胜,徐锐,等. 中棵烟高油分烟叶生产技术下的烤烟产质量变化[J]. 中南农业科技,2024,45(3):13-17. |
| [8] | 刘泳乐,刘建丰. 菜籽饼肥对邵阳烟叶品质及经济效益分析[J]. 中国农学通报,2012,28(4):215-219. |
| [9] | 田金云,李世金,杨悦章. 施用烟草专用复混肥及增施有机肥对烤烟生长的影响[J]. 安徽农学通报,2020,26(6):124-125. |
| [10] | 李文科,郭祥,童代伍,等. 不同用量菜子油灌根对烤烟品质的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学,2021,60(S1):216-218. |
| [11] | 李国富. 烟草油分物质基础研究[D]. 郑州:郑州大学,2015. |
| [12] | 梁永进,尚海丽,盘文政,等. 微生物菌肥对‘K326’烤烟生长发育及产质量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报,2021,37(23):45-51. |
| [13] | 马宜林,吴广海,申洪涛,等. 羊粪有机肥与化肥配施对烤烟生长及土壤肥力特性的影响[J]. 核农学报,2021,35(10):2423-2430. |
| [14] | 唐莉娜,张秋芳,陈顺辉. 不同有机肥与化肥配施对植烟土壤微生物群落PLFAs和烤烟品质的影响[J]. 中国烟草学报,2010,16(1):36-40. |
| [15] | 烟草农艺性状调查测量方法 [S]. |
| [16] | 烤烟 [S]. |
| [17] | 烟草及烟草制品 感官评价方法 [S]. |
| [18] | 烟草及烟草制品 水溶性糖的测定连续流动法 [S]. |
| [19] | 烟草及烟草制品 总氮的测定连续流动法 [S]. |
| [20] | 烟草及烟草制品 总植物碱的测定 连续流动(硫氰酸钾)法 [S]. |
| [21] | 烟草及烟草制品 钾的测定 火焰光度法 [S]. |
| [22] | 烟草及烟草制品 氯的测定 连续流动法 [S]. |
| [23] | 王瑞新. 烟草化学[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社,2003. |
| [24] | 烟草及烟草制品 磷酸盐的测定连续流动法 [S]. |
| [25] | 周初跃,邰先常,周寸伟,等. 连作障碍烟田施用油枯有机肥对烤烟生长及品质的影响[J]. 现代农业科技,2023(13):22-25. |
| [26] | 石贤吉,代超,闫寒,等. 饼肥与化肥不同配比对烤烟产量及质量的影响[J]. 延边大学农学学报,2017,39(3):39-43. |
| [27] | 田仁进,马家丽. 菜籽饼肥的不同施用量对普安烤烟品质的影响[J]. 农技服务,2017,34(10):47-49. |
| [28] | 张晓海,杨春江,王绍坤,等. 烤烟施用菜籽饼对烟田土壤后期供氮及烟叶品质的影响[J]. 云南农业大学学报,2004,19(1):95-99. |
| [1] | YANG Jifeng, WU Yong, FU Linhua, GUO Kefan, JIANG Qinghua, HUANG Fuyong, TANG Jinyu, JIN Jingzhong. Study and application of key breeding technologies for Whitmania pigra based on analysis of aquatic microorganisms [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(8): 1860-1864. |
| [2] | ZHOU Jianwu, MA Jiande. Characteristics of Chunchengyou 887 and optimization of nitrogen application rate and transplanting density for high-yielding cultivation [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(8): 1888-1893. |
| [3] | KE Zhen, LIN Mengqin, QI Jie, CAO Xuexian. Effects of reduced nitrogen application combined with organic fertilizer on crop phosphorus uptake efficiency and soil phosphorus supply capacity in a rice-wheat rotation system [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(8): 1894-1899. |
| [4] | GUO Chunjiang, DONG Yun, JIANG Zhikai, FAN Yongsheng, ZHU Hongcai, WANG Shikun. Evaluation on high-yield,stable-yield and wide-adaptability of new wheat variety Xinmai 9813 in the Huang-Huai winter wheat region [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(8): 1900-1904. |
| [5] | WU Xiaowen, WANG Yin, YANG Ling, PAN Zhijun, CHEN Long, LI Junsheng, HU Zhigang, SUN Lianwei, CHE Zhao. Effects of replacement of chemical nitrogen fertilizer by organic fertilizer on post-anthesis nitrogen metabolism and yield of wheat [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(8): 1905-1911. |
| [6] | ZHANG Xincheng, LIU Yan, WANG Zunjie, WANG Ling, MA Shanlin. Effects of sowing date and density on dry matter accumulation,translocation,and yield of Ningfengmai No.6 [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(8): 1912-1921. |
| [7] | YANG Yu, FU Jun, DENG Honglin, DENG Tao, WAN Yuting, SUN Bo. Evaluation of tropical adaptability of agronomic and quality traits in fresh maize [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(8): 1928-1932. |
| [8] | HE Weijun, ZHENG Ting, CHENG Jianhui. Technical specifications for high-quality cultivation of spine grape in Zhejiang Province [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(8): 1945-1948. |
| [9] | LIU Xueping, GU Zhaoshuai, WANG Jing, GAO Fei, ZHAO Li, LIU Yan, XU Minghua, LI Jihui. Comparison of quality characteristics of hawthorn leaves from different varieties at different stages [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(8): 1961-1965. |
| [10] | ZHOU Miao, LIU Xiaoxia, XU Jiezhang, LIN Baoyi. Nutrient accumulation and soil fertility enhancement of major Chinese milk vetch(Astragalus sinicus L.)varieties in Zhejiang Province [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(8): 2015-2019. |
| [11] | JIANG Lijun, ZHU Shenghu, JI Yongjin, LIU Zifei, JIN Guangchun, SUN Xiuhui. The foundation,logic,and path of the development of new quality productive forces in fisheries under the goal of modernization [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(8): 2045-2054. |
| [12] | SHENG Yueyue, ZOU Wenxiong, ZHU Wei, CHEN Xiaoyang. Analysis of crop seed quality in Zhejiang Province during the 14 th Five-Year Plan and improvement strategies [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(7): 1581-1586. |
| [13] | JIANG Qi, PAN Lingjie, HE Bingqing, HU Jijie, YANG Peibo, CHEN Shaojie. Performance and cultivation techniques of Yongyou 4901 as ratooning rice in eastern Zhejiang [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(7): 1587-1591. |
| [14] | WANG Wenjia, FENG Yanyu, WANG Wenjing, ZHU Ze, ZHOU Yujie. Analysis of new double-cropping rice varieties demonstration trials in Zhuji City,Zhejiang Province [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(7): 1592-1596. |
| [15] | YI Jianqun, DONG Zhiyun, LI Yun, LI Chengyong, XU Nanchang, WANG Honghang. Effects of seedling age and planting density on the growth period and yield of indica-japonica hybrid rice Chunyou 801 under machined-transplanting cultivation [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(7): 1601-1606. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||