
Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2026, Vol. 67 ›› Issue (7): 1581-1586.DOI: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20260299
Previous Articles Next Articles
SHENG Yueyue(
), ZOU Wenxiong, ZHU Wei, CHEN Xiaoyang(
)
Received:2026-04-20
Online:2026-07-11
Published:2026-07-27
Contact:
CHEN Xiaoyang
CLC Number:
SHENG Yueyue, ZOU Wenxiong, ZHU Wei, CHEN Xiaoyang. Analysis of crop seed quality in Zhejiang Province during the 14 th Five-Year Plan and improvement strategies[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(7): 1581-1586.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnykx.cn/EN/10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20260299
| 作物类别 | 作物种类 | 样品数量 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021年 | 2022年 | 2023年 | 2024年 | 2025年 | ||
| 粮油作物 | 水稻 | 245 | 236 | 198 | 212 | 151 |
| 玉米 | 146 | 132 | 122 | 119 | 105 | |
| 大豆 | 24 | 16 | 17 | 17 | 14 | |
| 油菜 | 39 | 27 | 20 | 13 | 47 | |
| 小麦 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 12 | |
| 其他(芝麻、高粱、大麦、蚕豆、花生) | 5 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 9 | |
| 合计 | 461 | 413 | 364 | 370 | 338 | |
| 瓜菜作物 | 不结球白菜 | 137 | 122 | 92 | 103 | 128 |
| 结球白菜 | 76 | 71 | 68 | 52 | 64 | |
| 长豇豆 | 27 | 26 | 23 | 17 | 9 | |
| 菜豆 | 23 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 6 | |
| 苋菜 | 29 | 16 | 21 | 22 | 19 | |
| 萝卜 | 14 | 30 | 15 | 8 | 18 | |
| 其他(豌豆、黄瓜、西瓜、莴苣、花椰菜等) | 66 | 59 | 53 | 51 | 47 | |
| 合计 | 372 | 336 | 285 | 267 | 291 | |
| 其他 | 棉花、紫云英 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| 共计 | 835 | 749 | 651 | 638 | 634 | |
Table 1 Crop supervision seed samples in Zhejiang Province during the 14 th Five-Year Plan
| 作物类别 | 作物种类 | 样品数量 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021年 | 2022年 | 2023年 | 2024年 | 2025年 | ||
| 粮油作物 | 水稻 | 245 | 236 | 198 | 212 | 151 |
| 玉米 | 146 | 132 | 122 | 119 | 105 | |
| 大豆 | 24 | 16 | 17 | 17 | 14 | |
| 油菜 | 39 | 27 | 20 | 13 | 47 | |
| 小麦 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 12 | |
| 其他(芝麻、高粱、大麦、蚕豆、花生) | 5 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 9 | |
| 合计 | 461 | 413 | 364 | 370 | 338 | |
| 瓜菜作物 | 不结球白菜 | 137 | 122 | 92 | 103 | 128 |
| 结球白菜 | 76 | 71 | 68 | 52 | 64 | |
| 长豇豆 | 27 | 26 | 23 | 17 | 9 | |
| 菜豆 | 23 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 6 | |
| 苋菜 | 29 | 16 | 21 | 22 | 19 | |
| 萝卜 | 14 | 30 | 15 | 8 | 18 | |
| 其他(豌豆、黄瓜、西瓜、莴苣、花椰菜等) | 66 | 59 | 53 | 51 | 47 | |
| 合计 | 372 | 336 | 285 | 267 | 291 | |
| 其他 | 棉花、紫云英 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| 共计 | 835 | 749 | 651 | 638 | 634 | |
| 作物类别 | 2021年 | 2022年 | 2023年 | 2024年 | 2025年 | 年均合格率/% | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
样品 数量 | 合格率/% | 样品 数量 | 合格率/% | 样品 数量 | 合格率/% | 样品 数量 | 合格率/% | 样品 数量 | 合格率/% | ||
| 粮油作物 | 461 | 98.5 | 413 | 99.3 | 364 | 97.5 | 370 | 98.1 | 338 | 97.9 | 98.3 |
| 瓜菜作物 | 372 | 86.6 | 336 | 94.1 | 285 | 93.0 | 267 | 86.1 | 291 | 86.3 | 89.2 |
Table 2 Seed quality qualification rates for grain and oil crops and melon and vegetable crops
| 作物类别 | 2021年 | 2022年 | 2023年 | 2024年 | 2025年 | 年均合格率/% | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
样品 数量 | 合格率/% | 样品 数量 | 合格率/% | 样品 数量 | 合格率/% | 样品 数量 | 合格率/% | 样品 数量 | 合格率/% | ||
| 粮油作物 | 461 | 98.5 | 413 | 99.3 | 364 | 97.5 | 370 | 98.1 | 338 | 97.9 | 98.3 |
| 瓜菜作物 | 372 | 86.6 | 336 | 94.1 | 285 | 93.0 | 267 | 86.1 | 291 | 86.3 | 89.2 |
| 年份 | 水稻 | 玉米 | 大豆 | 油菜 | 小麦 | 其他 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
样品 数量 | 合格率/% | 样品 数量 | 合格率/% | 样品 数量 | 合格率/% | 样品 数量 | 合格率/% | 样品 数量 | 合格率/% | 样品 数量 | 合格率/% | |
| 2021 | 245 | 99.6 | 146 | 99.3 | 24 | 83.3 | 39 | 100.0 | 2 | 100.0 | 5 | 80.0 |
| 2022 | 236 | 98.7 | 132 | 100.0 | 16 | 100.0 | 27 | 100.0 | 0 | — | 2 | 100.0 |
| 2023 | 198 | 99.5 | 122 | 98.4 | 17 | 70.6 | 20 | 100.0 | 1 | 100.0 | 6 | 83.3 |
| 2024 | 212 | 100.0 | 119 | 95.8 | 17 | 88.2 | 13 | 100.0 | 7 | 100.0 | 2 | 100.0 |
| 2025 | 151 | 99.3 | 105 | 100.0 | 14 | 78.6 | 47 | 97.9 | 12 | 91.7 | 9 | 88.9 |
Table 3 Seed quality qualification rate of different grain and oil crops
| 年份 | 水稻 | 玉米 | 大豆 | 油菜 | 小麦 | 其他 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
样品 数量 | 合格率/% | 样品 数量 | 合格率/% | 样品 数量 | 合格率/% | 样品 数量 | 合格率/% | 样品 数量 | 合格率/% | 样品 数量 | 合格率/% | |
| 2021 | 245 | 99.6 | 146 | 99.3 | 24 | 83.3 | 39 | 100.0 | 2 | 100.0 | 5 | 80.0 |
| 2022 | 236 | 98.7 | 132 | 100.0 | 16 | 100.0 | 27 | 100.0 | 0 | — | 2 | 100.0 |
| 2023 | 198 | 99.5 | 122 | 98.4 | 17 | 70.6 | 20 | 100.0 | 1 | 100.0 | 6 | 83.3 |
| 2024 | 212 | 100.0 | 119 | 95.8 | 17 | 88.2 | 13 | 100.0 | 7 | 100.0 | 2 | 100.0 |
| 2025 | 151 | 99.3 | 105 | 100.0 | 14 | 78.6 | 47 | 97.9 | 12 | 91.7 | 9 | 88.9 |
| 作物种类 | 指标 | 不同年份的检测结果 | 平均值 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | |||
| 杂交稻 | 净度 | 99.7 | 99.7 | 99.7 | 99.7 | 99.7 | 99.7 |
| 发芽率 | 87.4 | 87.5 | 88.2 | 88.6 | 87.0 | 87.7 | |
| 水分 | 11.5 | 11.6 | 11.4 | 11.8 | 11.7 | 11.6 | |
| 常规稻 | 净度 | 99.8 | 99.7 | 99.7 | 99.7 | 99.7 | 99.7 |
| 发芽率 | 86.6 | 86.3 | 87.9 | 87.1 | 86.0 | 86.8 | |
| 水分 | 12.8 | 12.8 | 12.7 | 12.6 | 12.2 | 12.6 | |
| 玉米(非单粒播种) | 净度 | 99.8 | 99.8 | 99.8 | 99.8 | 99.8 | 99.8 |
| 发芽率 | 90.0 | 92.0 | 91.0 | 91.0 | 91.0 | 91.0 | |
| 水分 | 11.5 | 11.4 | 11.3 | 11.6 | 11.4 | 11.4 | |
| 玉米(单粒播种) | 净度 | 99.8 | 99.8 | 99.9 | 99.8 | 99.8 | 99.8 |
| 发芽率 | 92.0 | 94.0 | 94.0 | 92.0 | 94.0 | 93.2 | |
| 水分 | 12.4 | 11.8 | 11.7 | 12.0 | 12.3 | 12.0 | |
| 大豆 | 净度 | 99.8 | 99.8 | 99.8 | 99.0 | 99.8 | 99.6 |
| 发芽率 | 87.5 | 87.6 | 87.8 | 89.1 | 87.0 | 87.8 | |
| 水分 | 12.2 | 11.9 | 12.9 | 11.9 | 11.9 | 12.2 | |
| 油菜 | 净度 | 99.8 | 99.7 | 99.7 | 98.0 | 99.8 | 99.4 |
| 发芽率 | 89.4 | 87.7 | 90.5 | 88.9 | 88.0 | 88.9 | |
| 水分 | 7.2 | 6.3 | 7.0 | 6.8 | 7.0 | 6.9 | |
Table 4 Purity,germination rate and moisture content results of major grain and oil crops
| 作物种类 | 指标 | 不同年份的检测结果 | 平均值 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | |||
| 杂交稻 | 净度 | 99.7 | 99.7 | 99.7 | 99.7 | 99.7 | 99.7 |
| 发芽率 | 87.4 | 87.5 | 88.2 | 88.6 | 87.0 | 87.7 | |
| 水分 | 11.5 | 11.6 | 11.4 | 11.8 | 11.7 | 11.6 | |
| 常规稻 | 净度 | 99.8 | 99.7 | 99.7 | 99.7 | 99.7 | 99.7 |
| 发芽率 | 86.6 | 86.3 | 87.9 | 87.1 | 86.0 | 86.8 | |
| 水分 | 12.8 | 12.8 | 12.7 | 12.6 | 12.2 | 12.6 | |
| 玉米(非单粒播种) | 净度 | 99.8 | 99.8 | 99.8 | 99.8 | 99.8 | 99.8 |
| 发芽率 | 90.0 | 92.0 | 91.0 | 91.0 | 91.0 | 91.0 | |
| 水分 | 11.5 | 11.4 | 11.3 | 11.6 | 11.4 | 11.4 | |
| 玉米(单粒播种) | 净度 | 99.8 | 99.8 | 99.9 | 99.8 | 99.8 | 99.8 |
| 发芽率 | 92.0 | 94.0 | 94.0 | 92.0 | 94.0 | 93.2 | |
| 水分 | 12.4 | 11.8 | 11.7 | 12.0 | 12.3 | 12.0 | |
| 大豆 | 净度 | 99.8 | 99.8 | 99.8 | 99.0 | 99.8 | 99.6 |
| 发芽率 | 87.5 | 87.6 | 87.8 | 89.1 | 87.0 | 87.8 | |
| 水分 | 12.2 | 11.9 | 12.9 | 11.9 | 11.9 | 12.2 | |
| 油菜 | 净度 | 99.8 | 99.7 | 99.7 | 98.0 | 99.8 | 99.4 |
| 发芽率 | 89.4 | 87.7 | 90.5 | 88.9 | 88.0 | 88.9 | |
| 水分 | 7.2 | 6.3 | 7.0 | 6.8 | 7.0 | 6.9 | |
| 年份 | 白菜类 | 豆类 | 绿叶菜类 | 瓜类 | 萝卜和胡萝卜 | 甘蓝类 | 其他 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
样品 数量 | 合格率/% | 样品 数量 | 合格率/% | 样品 数量 | 合格率/% | 样品 数量 | 合格率/% | 样品 数量 | 合格率/% | 样品 数量 | 合格率/% | 样品 数量 | 合格率/% | |
| 2021 | 213 | 90.6 | 51 | 80.4 | 64 | 70.3 | 18 | 100.0 | 14 | 100.0 | 8 | 100.0 | 4 | 75.0 |
| 2022 | 193 | 96.4 | 39 | 89.7 | 48 | 81.3 | 9 | 100.0 | 30 | 100.0 | 12 | 100.0 | 5 | 100.0 |
| 2023 | 160 | 98.1 | 37 | 94.6 | 42 | 73.8 | 19 | 89.7 | 16 | 100.0 | 5 | 80.0 | 6 | 83.3 |
| 2024 | 155 | 88.4 | 32 | 78.1 | 47 | 74.5 | 14 | 100.0 | 8 | 100.0 | 8 | 100.0 | 3 | 100.0 |
| 2025 | 192 | 85.2 | 16 | 87.5 | 38 | 81.6 | 12 | 83.3 | 19 | 100.0 | 11 | 100.0 | 3 | 66.7 |
Table 5 Seed quality qualification rates of different melon and vegetable crops
| 年份 | 白菜类 | 豆类 | 绿叶菜类 | 瓜类 | 萝卜和胡萝卜 | 甘蓝类 | 其他 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
样品 数量 | 合格率/% | 样品 数量 | 合格率/% | 样品 数量 | 合格率/% | 样品 数量 | 合格率/% | 样品 数量 | 合格率/% | 样品 数量 | 合格率/% | 样品 数量 | 合格率/% | |
| 2021 | 213 | 90.6 | 51 | 80.4 | 64 | 70.3 | 18 | 100.0 | 14 | 100.0 | 8 | 100.0 | 4 | 75.0 |
| 2022 | 193 | 96.4 | 39 | 89.7 | 48 | 81.3 | 9 | 100.0 | 30 | 100.0 | 12 | 100.0 | 5 | 100.0 |
| 2023 | 160 | 98.1 | 37 | 94.6 | 42 | 73.8 | 19 | 89.7 | 16 | 100.0 | 5 | 80.0 | 6 | 83.3 |
| 2024 | 155 | 88.4 | 32 | 78.1 | 47 | 74.5 | 14 | 100.0 | 8 | 100.0 | 8 | 100.0 | 3 | 100.0 |
| 2025 | 192 | 85.2 | 16 | 87.5 | 38 | 81.6 | 12 | 83.3 | 19 | 100.0 | 11 | 100.0 | 3 | 66.7 |
| 作物种类 | 指标 | 不同年份的检测结果 | 平均值 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | |||
| 不结球白菜 | 净度 | 99.2 | 99.4 | 99.5 | 99.4 | 99.6 | 99.4 |
| 发芽率 | 90.3 | 91.4 | 92.0 | 89.9 | 90.0 | 90.7 | |
| 水分 | 6.4 | 6.1 | 6.2 | 6.4 | 6.3 | 6.3 | |
| 结球白菜 | 净度 | 99.7 | 99.7 | 99.6 | 99.7 | 99.7 | 99.7 |
| 发芽率 | 92.3 | 93.5 | 93.5 | 91.5 | 93.0 | 92.8 | |
| 水分 | 6.2 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 6.3 | 6.2 | 6.2 | |
| 长豇豆 | 净度 | 99.8 | 99.7 | 99.8 | 99.7 | 99.5 | 99.7 |
| 发芽率 | 86.2 | 89.5 | 87.6 | 85.6 | 88.0 | 87.4 | |
| 水分 | 11.5 | 11.5 | 11.4 | 11.7 | 11.1 | 11.4 | |
| 菜豆 | 净度 | 99.8 | 99.8 | 99.8 | 99.8 | 99.8 | 99.8 |
| 发芽率 | 90.7 | 91.8 | 92.5 | 90.6 | 91.0 | 91.3 | |
| 水分 | 12.0 | 11.2 | 11.4 | 11.5 | 10.9 | 11.4 | |
| 苋菜 | 净度 | 99.5 | 99.6 | 99.5 | 99.4 | 99.6 | 99.5 |
| 发芽率 | 89.2 | 87.7 | 87.4 | 90.1 | 84.0 | 87.7 | |
| 水分 | 11.4 | 11.0 | 11.0 | 11.8 | 10.8 | 11.2 | |
Table 6 Purity,germination rate and moisture content results of major melon and vegetable crops
| 作物种类 | 指标 | 不同年份的检测结果 | 平均值 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | |||
| 不结球白菜 | 净度 | 99.2 | 99.4 | 99.5 | 99.4 | 99.6 | 99.4 |
| 发芽率 | 90.3 | 91.4 | 92.0 | 89.9 | 90.0 | 90.7 | |
| 水分 | 6.4 | 6.1 | 6.2 | 6.4 | 6.3 | 6.3 | |
| 结球白菜 | 净度 | 99.7 | 99.7 | 99.6 | 99.7 | 99.7 | 99.7 |
| 发芽率 | 92.3 | 93.5 | 93.5 | 91.5 | 93.0 | 92.8 | |
| 水分 | 6.2 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 6.3 | 6.2 | 6.2 | |
| 长豇豆 | 净度 | 99.8 | 99.7 | 99.8 | 99.7 | 99.5 | 99.7 |
| 发芽率 | 86.2 | 89.5 | 87.6 | 85.6 | 88.0 | 87.4 | |
| 水分 | 11.5 | 11.5 | 11.4 | 11.7 | 11.1 | 11.4 | |
| 菜豆 | 净度 | 99.8 | 99.8 | 99.8 | 99.8 | 99.8 | 99.8 |
| 发芽率 | 90.7 | 91.8 | 92.5 | 90.6 | 91.0 | 91.3 | |
| 水分 | 12.0 | 11.2 | 11.4 | 11.5 | 10.9 | 11.4 | |
| 苋菜 | 净度 | 99.5 | 99.6 | 99.5 | 99.4 | 99.6 | 99.5 |
| 发芽率 | 89.2 | 87.7 | 87.4 | 90.1 | 84.0 | 87.7 | |
| 水分 | 11.4 | 11.0 | 11.0 | 11.8 | 10.8 | 11.2 | |
| [1] | 邹文雄,关亚静,湛立伟,等. 浙江省作物种子品质现状与提升对策[J]. 浙江农业科学,2024,65(6):1507-1511. |
| [2] | 职占锋,张兆旭,钱卫红,等. 2002—2007年南京市种子市场种子质量的变化趋势分析[J]. 种子,2010,29(5):88-91. |
| [3] | 蔡芸菲,祝玮,蔡煜铧,等. 浙江省蔬菜种业发展现状及建议对策[J]. 浙江农业科学,2022,63(5):883-886. |
| [4] | 秦叶波,孙健,丁检,等. 浙江省水稻生产现状及绿色生产发展措施建议[J]. 中国稻米,2018,24(3):76-78. |
| [5] | 金峰昌. 沿海地区大豆储藏技术探讨[J]. 齐鲁粮食,2018(7):44-45. |
| [6] | 赵悦晨,李彬. 浅析气候变化对农作物生长的影响及应对策略[J]. 河南农业,2025(14):88-90. |
| [7] | 代明慧,于法稳. 气候变化背景下的我国粮食安全[J]. 甘肃社会科学,2025(4):228-236. |
| [8] | 陈鹏文,胡军. 基于近红外光谱技术的种子检测研究现状[J]. 南方农机,2024,55(22):62-64. |
| [9] | 辛怡诺,邱艳红,罗来鑫,等. 光谱技术在种子健康检测中的应用研究进展[J]. 种子,2025,44(10):105-112. |
| [10] | 李燕,陈小央,王敏,等. 浙江省农作物种业企业发展现状与扶优对策研究[J]. 浙江农业科学,2026,67(1):5-10. |
| [1] | YANG Dong, KONG Haimin, JI Tianwei, LIAN Zhenghua, HUANG Suqing. Achievements and optimal layout of the cultivated land quality monitoring system in Zhejiang Province [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(7): 1812-1815. |
| [2] | ZHANG Chang. Effectiveness,issues,and prospects of artificial intelligence technology application scenarios in future farm in Zhejiang Province [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(7): 1834-1840. |
| [3] | PAN Yueyun, YANG Yujiao, DING Zhengquan, SHI Yang, HUANG Haixiang. Analysis of regional trials of glutinous rice varieties in Zhejiang Province from 2019 to 2023 [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(4): 838-841. |
| [4] | HU Bao, GU Yikang. Zhejiang's practice and enlightenment of promoting rural revitalization through regional cluster development [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(1): 1-4. |
| [5] | RU Shuijiang, KE Fuzhi, HUANG Zhendong, WANG Peng, LU Lianming, CHEN Guoqing, XU Jianguo. Current situation, problems and development countermeasures of citrus industry in Zhejiang Province [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(9): 2169-2175. |
| [6] | QIU Yunfeng, CHEN Yupei, SHAN Yingjie, LU Ruohui. Current situation and countermeasures of citrus fertilization in Zhejiang Province [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(9): 2176-2180. |
| [7] | LIAN Zhenghua, CHEN Yiding, KONG Haimin, CHEN Hongjin. Analysis of the current status and variation trend of the cultivated land quality in Zhejiang Province under long-term location monitoring [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(8): 2002-2007. |
| [8] | CHEN Zhengdao, MA Shitai, GAO Jingwen, WANG Zhonglin, HU Guotao, WANG Feng. Discussion on the green development of agriculture in Zhejiang Province in the new era [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(8): 2054-2059. |
| [9] | CHEN Huijie, YING Chengtong, YANG Hongxun. Analysis of current status and development trends of famous, special, excellent and new agricultural products in Zhejiang Province [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(7): 1779-1783. |
| [10] | WANG Shuwen, SHI Yisen, XIE Shuzhen, LIU Lingmin, SHENG Kai, ZHOU Jiayan, HU Zhangjian. Current situation and development strategies of vegetable industry in Zhejiang Province [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(6): 1559-1564. |
| [11] | ZHAO Yuhe, HU Bao. Exploring the development path of creative agriculture in Zhejiang Province from the perspective of rural revitalization [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(2): 281-287. |
| [12] | REN Xiliang, GAO Tianyi, HUANG Li, GUO Juling, WANG Jie. Progress in breeding of non-heading Chinese cabbage in Zhejiang Province [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(11): 2645-2648. |
| [13] | MAO Xueqin, QIU Haiping, CHAI Rongyao, HAO Zhongna, ZHANG Zhen, WANG Jiaoyu, SUN Guocang, WANG Yanli. Analysis of avirulence genes in Magnaporthe oryzae in Zhejiang Province [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(10): 2426-2431. |
| [14] | WANG Yu, MAO Xiaobao, WANG Jin, FU Linlin, MAO Xiaohong. Practical research on the integrated reform of strengthening rural areas and enriching farmers with collective economy as the core in Zhejiang Province [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(1): 1-10. |
| [15] | TONG Lei, LIN Qianhan, CAO Yirong. Spatial distribution characteristics and development influencing factors of new agricultural business entities in Zhejiang Province [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(1): 11-19. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||