Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2024, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (4): 839-843.DOI: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20230546
Previous Articles Next Articles
HE Xiaochan1(
), ZHOU Xiaojun1, ZHU Liyan1, ZHU Hao1, LYU Zhongxian2, XU Hongxing2,*()
Received:2023-05-21
Online:2024-04-11
Published:2024-04-22
CLC Number:
HE Xiaochan, ZHOU Xiaojun, ZHU Liyan, ZHU Hao, LYU Zhongxian, XU Hongxing. Effect of transgenic rice infected with SRBSDV on plant nutrient contents[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(4): 839-843.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnykx.cn/EN/10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20230546
| 植株 | MH63/cm | T1C-19/cm | T2A-1/cm |
|---|---|---|---|
| 正常水稻 | 126.13±2.03 | 128.00±1.67 | 129.63±1.58 |
| SRBSDV | 107.33±6.04 | 98.83±5.76 | 109.83±4.91 |
| P | 0.025 | 0.003 | 0.008 |
Table 1 Effect of SRBSDV-infected plants on plant height of transgenic rice
| 植株 | MH63/cm | T1C-19/cm | T2A-1/cm |
|---|---|---|---|
| 正常水稻 | 126.13±2.03 | 128.00±1.67 | 129.63±1.58 |
| SRBSDV | 107.33±6.04 | 98.83±5.76 | 109.83±4.91 |
| P | 0.025 | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| 植株 | MH63/% | T1C-19/% | T2A-1/% |
|---|---|---|---|
| SRBSDV | 1.90±0.02 | 2.09±0.06 | 2.19±0.14 |
| 正常水稻 | 2.10±0.10 | 2.12±0.05 | 1.89±0.01 |
| P | 0.137 | 0.742 | 0.116 |
Table 2 Effect of SRBSDV-infected plants on soluble sugar contents of transgenic rice
| 植株 | MH63/% | T1C-19/% | T2A-1/% |
|---|---|---|---|
| SRBSDV | 1.90±0.02 | 2.09±0.06 | 2.19±0.14 |
| 正常水稻 | 2.10±0.10 | 2.12±0.05 | 1.89±0.01 |
| P | 0.137 | 0.742 | 0.116 |
| 植株 | MH63 | T2A-1 | T1C-19 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N含量/% | C含量/% | N含量/% | C含量/% | N含量/% | C含量/% | |
| SRBSDV | 3.04±0.02 | 39.46±0.01 | 2.49±0.02 | 40.00±0.05 | 2.86±0.01 | 39.76±0.51 |
| 正常水稻 | 2.48±0.03 | 39.08±0.09 | 2.64±0.04 | 38.51±0.09 | 2.53±0.02 | 38.30±0.05 |
| P | 0.005 | 0.134 | 0.742 | 0.014 | 0.014 | 0.209 |
Table 3 Effects of SRBSDV-infected plants on carbon and nitrogen content of transgenic rice
| 植株 | MH63 | T2A-1 | T1C-19 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N含量/% | C含量/% | N含量/% | C含量/% | N含量/% | C含量/% | |
| SRBSDV | 3.04±0.02 | 39.46±0.01 | 2.49±0.02 | 40.00±0.05 | 2.86±0.01 | 39.76±0.51 |
| 正常水稻 | 2.48±0.03 | 39.08±0.09 | 2.64±0.04 | 38.51±0.09 | 2.53±0.02 | 38.30±0.05 |
| P | 0.005 | 0.134 | 0.742 | 0.014 | 0.014 | 0.209 |
| 氨基酸 | 正常植株/% | 病株/% | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| 天门冬氨酸 | 0.63±0.00 | 1.09±0.01 | 0.002 |
| 苏氨酸 | 0.31±0.00 | 0.46±0.00 | 0.001 |
| 丝氨酸 | 0.32±0.00 | 0.49±0.00 | 0.001 |
| 谷氨酸 | 0.72±0.00 | 1.12±0.00 | 0.027 |
| 脯氨酸 | 0.36±0.00 | 0.49±0.00 | 0.001 |
| 甘氨酸 | 0.35±0.00 | 0.46±0.02 | 0.109 |
| 丙氨酸 | 0.45±0.01 | 0.57±0.01 | 0.013 |
| 缬氨酸 | 0.33±0.01 | 0.48±0.00 | 0.030 |
| 蛋氨酸 | 0.03±0.00 | 0.03±0.00 | 0.348 |
| 异亮氨酸 | 0.25±0.01 | 0.38±0.00 | 0.052 |
| 亮氨酸 | 0.53±0.02 | 0.78±0.00 | 0.054 |
| 酪氨酸 | 0.07±0.00 | 0.13±0.00 | 0.039 |
| 苯丙氨酸 | 0.32±0.00 | 0.48±0.01 | 0.018 |
| 组氨酸 | 0.29±0.01 | 0.44±0.01 | 0.029 |
| 赖氨酸 | 0.33±0.01 | 0.51±0.00 | 0.026 |
| 精氨酸 | 0.24±0.00 | 0.41±0.00 | 0.009 |
| 总氨基酸 | 5.53±0.06 | 8.33±0.05 | 0.001 |
Table 4 Changes in amino acid contents in SRBSDV-infected rice plants of MH63
| 氨基酸 | 正常植株/% | 病株/% | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| 天门冬氨酸 | 0.63±0.00 | 1.09±0.01 | 0.002 |
| 苏氨酸 | 0.31±0.00 | 0.46±0.00 | 0.001 |
| 丝氨酸 | 0.32±0.00 | 0.49±0.00 | 0.001 |
| 谷氨酸 | 0.72±0.00 | 1.12±0.00 | 0.027 |
| 脯氨酸 | 0.36±0.00 | 0.49±0.00 | 0.001 |
| 甘氨酸 | 0.35±0.00 | 0.46±0.02 | 0.109 |
| 丙氨酸 | 0.45±0.01 | 0.57±0.01 | 0.013 |
| 缬氨酸 | 0.33±0.01 | 0.48±0.00 | 0.030 |
| 蛋氨酸 | 0.03±0.00 | 0.03±0.00 | 0.348 |
| 异亮氨酸 | 0.25±0.01 | 0.38±0.00 | 0.052 |
| 亮氨酸 | 0.53±0.02 | 0.78±0.00 | 0.054 |
| 酪氨酸 | 0.07±0.00 | 0.13±0.00 | 0.039 |
| 苯丙氨酸 | 0.32±0.00 | 0.48±0.01 | 0.018 |
| 组氨酸 | 0.29±0.01 | 0.44±0.01 | 0.029 |
| 赖氨酸 | 0.33±0.01 | 0.51±0.00 | 0.026 |
| 精氨酸 | 0.24±0.00 | 0.41±0.00 | 0.009 |
| 总氨基酸 | 5.53±0.06 | 8.33±0.05 | 0.001 |
| 氨基酸 | 正常植株/% | 病株/% | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| 天门冬氨酸 | 0.75±0.01 | 0.95±0.01 | 0.010 |
| 苏氨酸 | 0.37±0.00 | 0.43±0.00 | 0.020 |
| 丝氨酸 | 0.37±0.01 | 0.43±0.00 | 0.022 |
| 谷氨酸 | 0.88±0.01 | 1.00±0.01 | 0.020 |
| 脯氨酸 | 0.44±0.01 | 0.46±0.02 | 0.368 |
| 甘氨酸 | 0.43±0.00 | 0.47±0.00 | 0.023 |
| 丙氨酸 | 0.54±0.01 | 0.57±0.00 | 0.103 |
| 缬氨酸 | 0.41±0.00 | 0.45±0.00 | 0.014 |
| 蛋氨酸 | 0.03±0.01 | 0.02±0.00 | 0.682 |
| 异亮氨酸 | 0.32±0.00 | 0.35±0.00 | 0.019 |
| 亮氨酸 | 0.69±0.00 | 0.74±0.00 | 0.010 |
| 酪氨酸 | 0.10±0.00 | 0.12±0.00 | 0.002 |
| 苯丙氨酸 | 0.41±0.00 | 0.44±0.00 | 0.052 |
| 组氨酸 | 0.33±0.01 | 0.39±0.01 | 0.035 |
| 赖氨酸 | 0.40±0.00 | 0.47±0.01 | 0.028 |
| 精氨酸 | 0.35±0.00 | 0.38±0.00 | 0.005 |
| 总氨基酸 | 6.81±0.01 | 7.65±0.04 | 0.021 |
Table 5 Changes in amino acid contents in SRBSDV-infected rice plants of T1C-19
| 氨基酸 | 正常植株/% | 病株/% | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| 天门冬氨酸 | 0.75±0.01 | 0.95±0.01 | 0.010 |
| 苏氨酸 | 0.37±0.00 | 0.43±0.00 | 0.020 |
| 丝氨酸 | 0.37±0.01 | 0.43±0.00 | 0.022 |
| 谷氨酸 | 0.88±0.01 | 1.00±0.01 | 0.020 |
| 脯氨酸 | 0.44±0.01 | 0.46±0.02 | 0.368 |
| 甘氨酸 | 0.43±0.00 | 0.47±0.00 | 0.023 |
| 丙氨酸 | 0.54±0.01 | 0.57±0.00 | 0.103 |
| 缬氨酸 | 0.41±0.00 | 0.45±0.00 | 0.014 |
| 蛋氨酸 | 0.03±0.01 | 0.02±0.00 | 0.682 |
| 异亮氨酸 | 0.32±0.00 | 0.35±0.00 | 0.019 |
| 亮氨酸 | 0.69±0.00 | 0.74±0.00 | 0.010 |
| 酪氨酸 | 0.10±0.00 | 0.12±0.00 | 0.002 |
| 苯丙氨酸 | 0.41±0.00 | 0.44±0.00 | 0.052 |
| 组氨酸 | 0.33±0.01 | 0.39±0.01 | 0.035 |
| 赖氨酸 | 0.40±0.00 | 0.47±0.01 | 0.028 |
| 精氨酸 | 0.35±0.00 | 0.38±0.00 | 0.005 |
| 总氨基酸 | 6.81±0.01 | 7.65±0.04 | 0.021 |
| 氨基酸 | 正常植株/% | 病株/% | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| 天门冬氨酸 | 0.80±0.00 | 0.89±0.01 | 0.035 |
| 苏氨酸 | 0.39±0.00 | 0.42±0.00 | 0.023 |
| 丝氨酸 | 0.39±0.00 | 0.43±0.01 | 0.099 |
| 谷氨酸 | 0.89±0.01 | 0.98±0.00 | 0.020 |
| 脯氨酸 | 0.42±0.01 | 0.46±0.01 | 0.054 |
| 甘氨酸 | 0.43±0.01 | 0.46±0.01 | 0.132 |
| 丙氨酸 | 0.55±0.00 | 0.57±0.01 | 0.329 |
| 缬氨酸 | 0.41±0.00 | 0.45±0.00 | 0.065 |
| 蛋氨酸 | 0.03±0.00 | 0.03±0.00 | 0.625 |
| 异亮氨酸 | 0.32±0.00 | 0.35±0.00 | 0.006 |
| 亮氨酸 | 0.68±0.00 | 0.74±0.00 | 0.009 |
| 酪氨酸 | 0.11±0.00 | 0.11±0.00 | 0.293 |
| 苯丙氨酸 | 0.42±0.01 | 0.45±0.00 | 0.194 |
| 组氨酸 | 0.32±0.00 | 0.38±0.00 | 0.025 |
| 赖氨酸 | 0.41±0.00 | 0.45±0.00 | 0.008 |
| 精氨酸 | 0.35±0.00 | 0.37±0.01 | 0.255 |
| 总氨基酸 | 6.92±0.03 | 7.53±0.04 | 0.010 |
Table 6 Changes in amino acid contents in SRBSDV-infected rice plants of T2A-1
| 氨基酸 | 正常植株/% | 病株/% | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| 天门冬氨酸 | 0.80±0.00 | 0.89±0.01 | 0.035 |
| 苏氨酸 | 0.39±0.00 | 0.42±0.00 | 0.023 |
| 丝氨酸 | 0.39±0.00 | 0.43±0.01 | 0.099 |
| 谷氨酸 | 0.89±0.01 | 0.98±0.00 | 0.020 |
| 脯氨酸 | 0.42±0.01 | 0.46±0.01 | 0.054 |
| 甘氨酸 | 0.43±0.01 | 0.46±0.01 | 0.132 |
| 丙氨酸 | 0.55±0.00 | 0.57±0.01 | 0.329 |
| 缬氨酸 | 0.41±0.00 | 0.45±0.00 | 0.065 |
| 蛋氨酸 | 0.03±0.00 | 0.03±0.00 | 0.625 |
| 异亮氨酸 | 0.32±0.00 | 0.35±0.00 | 0.006 |
| 亮氨酸 | 0.68±0.00 | 0.74±0.00 | 0.009 |
| 酪氨酸 | 0.11±0.00 | 0.11±0.00 | 0.293 |
| 苯丙氨酸 | 0.42±0.01 | 0.45±0.00 | 0.194 |
| 组氨酸 | 0.32±0.00 | 0.38±0.00 | 0.025 |
| 赖氨酸 | 0.41±0.00 | 0.45±0.00 | 0.008 |
| 精氨酸 | 0.35±0.00 | 0.37±0.01 | 0.255 |
| 总氨基酸 | 6.92±0.03 | 7.53±0.04 | 0.010 |
| [1] | ZHANG H M, YANG J, CHEN J P, et al. A black-streaked dwarf disease on rice in China is caused by a novel Fijivirus[J]. Archives of Vriology, 2008, 153(10): 1893-1898. |
| [2] | ZHOU G H, WEN J, CAI D J, et al. Southern rice black-streaked dwarf virus: a new proposed Fijivirus species in the family Reoviridae[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2008, 53(23): 3677-3685. |
| [3] | 张彤, 周国辉. 南方水稻黑条矮缩病研究进展[J]. 植物保护学报, 2017, 44(6): 896-904. |
| [4] | 李照会, 郭兴启, 叶保华, 等. 感染玉米粗缩病毒后玉米植株的超微结构病变研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2002, 35(3): 264-266, 350-351. |
| [5] | 周国辉, 张曙光, 邹寿发, 等. 水稻新病害南方水稻黑条矮缩病发生特点及危害趋势分析[J]. 植物保护, 2010, 36(2): 144-146. |
| [6] | COLVIN J, OMONGO C A, GOVINDAPPA M R, et al. Host-plant viral infection effects on arthropod-vector population growth, development and behaviour: management and epidemiological implications[J]. Advances in Virus Research, 2006, 67: 419-452. |
| [7] | XU H X, HE X C, ZHENG X S, et al. Influence of rice black streaked dwarf virus on the ecological fitness of non-vector planthopper Nilaparvata lugens (Hemiptera: Delphacidae)[J]. Insect Science, 2014, 21(4): 507-514. |
| [8] | MAUCK K E, DE MORAES C M, MESCHER M C. Deceptive chemical signals induced by a plant virus attract insect vectors to inferior hosts[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010, 107(8): 3600-3605. |
| [9] | MAUCK K E, DE MORAES C M, MESCHER M C. Biochemical and physiological mechanisms underlying effects of Cucumber mosaic virus on host-plant traits that mediate transmission by aphid vectors[J]. Plant, Cell & Environment, 2014, 37(6): 1427-1439. |
| [10] | 张泽龙, 张蓓蓓, 何海芳, 等. 瓜类褪绿黄化病毒对黄瓜叶片营养及防御反应的影响[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2021, 55(2): 281-286. |
| [11] | 张超, 龚前园, 张永强, 等. 介导植物病毒病症状发生的病毒元件与寄主因子[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2014, 16(2): 44-49. |
| [12] | ZHU S F, GAO F, CAO X S, et al. The rice dwarf virus P2 protein interacts with ent-kaurene oxidases in vivo, leading to reduced biosynthesis of gibberellins and rice dwarf symptoms[J]. Plant Physiology, 2005, 139(4): 1935-1945. |
| [13] | PADMANABHAN M S, GOREGAOKER S P, GOLEM S, et al. Interaction of the tobacco mosaic virus replicase protein with the Aux/IAA protein PAP1/IAA26 is associated with disease development[J]. Journal of Virology, 2005, 79(4): 2549-2558. |
| [14] | 洪健, 徐颖, 黎军英, 等. 芜菁花叶病毒(TuMV)侵染对寄主植物光合作用的影响[J]. 电子显微学报, 2002, 21(2): 110-113. |
| [15] | 吕仲贤, 胡萃, 杨樟法. 氮和糖对亚洲玉米螟幼虫生长发育的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 1996, 8(4): 222-225. |
| [16] | YIN X, XU F F, ZHENG F Q, et al. Molecular characterization of segments S7 to S10 of a southern rice black-streaked dwarf virus isolate from maize in Northern China[J]. Virologica Sinica, 2011, 26(1): 47-53. |
| [17] | DÖRING T F, CHITTKA L. Visual ecology of aphids:a critical review on the role of colours in host finding[J]. Arthropod-Plant Interactions, 2007, 1(1): 3-16. |
| [18] | MEDINA-ORTEGA K J, BOSQUE-PÉREZ N A, NGUMBI E, et al. Rhopalosiphum padi (Hemiptera:Aphididae) responses to volatile cues from barley yellow dwarf virus-infected wheat[J]. Environmental Entomology, 2009, 38(3): 836-845. |
| [19] | 丁天波, 周雪, 杨楠, 等. ToCV单独侵染和TYLCV&ToCV复合侵染番茄植株上烟粉虱寄主适应性及寄主植物营养成分含量和防御反应变化[J]. 昆虫学报, 2021, 64(3): 384-391. |
| [20] | 闫慧娟, 韩玉杰, 周小梅, 等. 不同抗性玉米接种矮花叶病毒后的生理生化变化研究[J]. 山西大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 33(3): 458-462. |
| [21] | 陈茜, 刘英杰, 董勇浩, 等. 黄瓜花叶病毒侵染烟草对烟蚜生长发育、取食和选择行为的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(8): 1673-1683. |
| [22] | 何晓婵, 徐红星, 郑许松, 等. 水稻黑条矮缩病毒对非介体稻飞虱:白背飞虱适应性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2011, 25(6): 654-658. |
| [23] | 陆京杰, 陈永萱. 大豆花叶病毒的侵染对大豆碳氨化合物代谢的影响[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 1994, 17 (2): 43-47. |
| [24] | 陈茜, 刘金燕, 徐蓬军, 等. PVY侵染后烟草营养成分的变化及其对介体烟蚜生长发育的影响[J]. 昆虫学报, 2020, 63(2): 181-190. |
| [25] | 杨熙彬, 蒋德春, 杨洪, 等. 南方水稻黑条矮缩病对水稻营养物质和两种稻飞虱解毒酶活性的影响[J]. 山地农业生物学报, 2019, 38(4): 13-18. |
| [1] | YANG Sen, KONG Lingjuan, ZHANG Qi, WANG Qing, LUO Zhongming, ZHANG Xiaohong, JIN Sijiu, YUAN Gongping. Comparative study on regeneration ability and yield of rationing rice cultivation with different hybrid medium rice [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(4): 749-755. |
| [2] | GUO Ying, LI Zhiying, ZHAI Rongrong, YE Jing, WANG Wenpo, YE Shenghai, WANG Jian. Analysis of agronomic traits of 9 representative varieties of late japonica rice in Zhejiang Province [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(4): 756-759. |
| [3] | SONG Youliang, ZHANG Kan, ZHOU Xingyuan. Selection of high quality late japonica rice new lines suitable for Yujiang Region in Jiangxi Province [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(4): 767-770. |
| [4] | ZHU Lijuan, ZHOU Jianxia, ZHENG Nengwen, QI Xue. Characteristics and high yield cultivation techniques of Huazhong You 1 under continuous late cultivation [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(4): 771-775. |
| [5] | YU Faming, ZHANG Zhihong, ZHU Guofu, ZHAI Rongrong, YE Jing, WU Mingming, YANG Shudong. Breeding of early indica rice variety Zhezao 33 with high amylose content and soft gel consistency [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(4): 776-779. |
| [6] | JIN Haojing, CAO Yuqing, ZHENG Lixin, LI Weishan, MA Qiang, DONG Guojun. Breeding and seed production technology of a indica-japonica hybrid rice variety Jiafengyou 3 with high-yield and high-quality [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(4): 780-784. |
| [7] | JIN Haojing, ZHOU Qiaoyu, LI Weishan, ZHENG Lixin, DONG Guojun. Breeding and seed production technology of a indica-japonica hybrid rice variety Jiaheyou 7245 with high-yield and high-quality [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(4): 785-789. |
| [8] | BAO Miaoqing, DU Jia, CHEN Peng. Comparison of different new early indica rice varieties in Jinhua Area [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(4): 799-801. |
| [9] | FAN Feijun, ZHU Dawei, DENG Xiajun, CAI Binqi, SHANG Zishuai, ZHAO Xiaoxia, LIU Bo. Study on the selection of high quality indica rice varieties in the southwest mountain area of Zhejiang Province [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(4): 802-807. |
| [10] | GU Shuwen, XU Hongcheng, LI Zhe, CHEN Jinzhu, WU Haifeng, YANG Shicai, PAN Zhudong, ZHU Kongzhi. Effect of different harvest periods on the quality of F1 hybrid rice seeds [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(4): 808-811. |
| [11] | LI Chengyong, XIA Ying, LI Yun, LI Zhengquan, XU Nanchang, WANG Honghang, YUAN Minliang. “Rice-soybean-rape” three-cropping water-upland rotation green and efficient cultivation technology [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(4): 812-816. |
| [12] | XU Youxiang, ZHU Zhenling, WANG Yufei, TONG Lu, ZHOU Lingxiao, ZHANG Yan, SHAO Guosheng, YIN Xianyuan. Effect of organic fertilizer instead of partial chemical fertilizer on rice yield and soil physicochemical properties [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(4): 817-822. |
| [13] | SUN Jianlong, ZHANG Xincheng, REN Yun, WANG Fengying, LU Hongying, QIAN Weihong, MA Shanlin. Effects of nitrogen rate on yield and accumulation of storage protein in indica-japonica hybrid rice [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(4): 823-829. |
| [14] | DI Aifang, LI Jianqiang. Comparative test of fertilizer efficiency of different slow-release fertilizers in rice with equal nitrogen applications [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(4): 830-833. |
| [15] | XIE Changyan, LI Qing, CHEN Chuan, DONG Qingjun, ZHANG Miao, ZHANG Ankang. Effect of dredging river mud and plant ash residue as substrate on rice seedling quality [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(4): 834-838. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
