
Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2026, Vol. 67 ›› Issue (4): 970-975.DOI: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20250237
Previous Articles Next Articles
TANG Yongyu(
), CHEN Guofa, YUAN Jiangcheng, LI Guoping, WANG Yanni, LI Zilin, LUO Yingkun, LI Chengjie, HE Biao
Received:2025-03-31
Online:2026-04-11
Published:2026-04-17
CLC Number:
TANG Yongyu, CHEN Guofa, YUAN Jiangcheng, LI Guoping, WANG Yanni, LI Zilin, LUO Yingkun, LI Chengjie, HE Biao. Evaluation of the control effect of 5 different pesticides on tobacco Meloidogyne disease[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(4): 970-975.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnykx.cn/EN/10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20250237
| 处理 | 药后45 d | 药后90 d | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 虫口密度/g-1 | 线虫减退率/% | 虫口密度/g-1 | 线虫减退率/% | |
| C1 | 191.67±4.41 b | 31.76±2.03 d | 278.33±3.48 b | 37.36±0.52 c |
| C2 | 153.33±4.81 d | 45.39±2.23 b | 232.00±3.61 d | 47.78±1.06 a |
| C3 | 127.00±3.61 e | 54.80±1.19 a | 222.33±1.20 d | 49.95±0.56 a |
| C4 | 171.00±1.15 c | 39.13±0.93 c | 263.33±2.91 c | 40.73±0.91 b |
| C5 | 159.67±1.20 cd | 43.15±1.05 bc | 256.00±2.08 c | 42.38±0.87 b |
| CK | 281.00±3.21 a | — | 444.33±3.28 a | — |
Table 1 Number of root-knot nematodes in the rhizosphere soil of tobacco plants under different chemical treatments
| 处理 | 药后45 d | 药后90 d | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 虫口密度/g-1 | 线虫减退率/% | 虫口密度/g-1 | 线虫减退率/% | |
| C1 | 191.67±4.41 b | 31.76±2.03 d | 278.33±3.48 b | 37.36±0.52 c |
| C2 | 153.33±4.81 d | 45.39±2.23 b | 232.00±3.61 d | 47.78±1.06 a |
| C3 | 127.00±3.61 e | 54.80±1.19 a | 222.33±1.20 d | 49.95±0.56 a |
| C4 | 171.00±1.15 c | 39.13±0.93 c | 263.33±2.91 c | 40.73±0.91 b |
| C5 | 159.67±1.20 cd | 43.15±1.05 bc | 256.00±2.08 c | 42.38±0.87 b |
| CK | 281.00±3.21 a | — | 444.33±3.28 a | — |
Fig. 1 The disease incidence of the above-ground parts of Yunyan 99 tobacco plant after 45 days(left)and 90 days(right)under different chemical treatments
| 处理 | 药后45 d | 药后90 d | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 病情指数 | 防治效果/% | 病情指数 | 防治效果/% | |
| C1 | 5.05±0.08 b | 30.35±1.05 d | 18.73±0.14 b | 23.80±0.58 e |
| C2 | 2.00±0.22 d | 72.41±3.00 b | 5.90±0.24 e | 76.00±0.96 b |
| C3 | 1.15±0.22 e | 84.14±3.01 a | 4.35±0.26 f | 82.31±1.06 a |
| C4 | 4.07±0.25 c | 43.91±3.43 c | 16.45±0.51 c | 33.08±2.08 d |
| C5 | 4.03±0.18 c | 44.37±2.43 c | 14.92±0.42 d | 39.32±1.71 c |
| CK | 7.25±0.24 a | — | 24.58±0.31 a | — |
Table 2 Control effect on Meloidogyne disease of Yunyan 99 under different chemical treatments
| 处理 | 药后45 d | 药后90 d | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 病情指数 | 防治效果/% | 病情指数 | 防治效果/% | |
| C1 | 5.05±0.08 b | 30.35±1.05 d | 18.73±0.14 b | 23.80±0.58 e |
| C2 | 2.00±0.22 d | 72.41±3.00 b | 5.90±0.24 e | 76.00±0.96 b |
| C3 | 1.15±0.22 e | 84.14±3.01 a | 4.35±0.26 f | 82.31±1.06 a |
| C4 | 4.07±0.25 c | 43.91±3.43 c | 16.45±0.51 c | 33.08±2.08 d |
| C5 | 4.03±0.18 c | 44.37±2.43 c | 14.92±0.42 d | 39.32±1.71 c |
| CK | 7.25±0.24 a | — | 24.58±0.31 a | — |
| 时期 | 处理 | 株高/cm | 茎围/cm | 节距/cm | 最大叶长/cm | 最大叶宽/cm | 有效叶数 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 旺长期 | C1 | 48.83±0.29 a | 6.83±0.10 b | 2.84±0.02 b | 46.99±0.40 b | 19.44±0.12 b | 9.00±0.19 b |
| C2 | 49.34±0.25 a | 7.08±0.10 b | 2.75±0.04 b | 48.32±0.19 a | 19.75±0.13 b | 9.70±0.27 ab | |
| C3 | 49.50±0.28 a | 7.49±0.08 a | 3.02±0.04 a | 47.41±0.41 ab | 21.98±0.31 a | 10.07±0.27 a | |
| C4 | 48.84±0.25 a | 6.96±0.08 b | 2.78±0.03 b | 46.15±0.41 bc | 19.59±0.11 b | 9.03±0.16 b | |
| C5 | 48.79±0.20 a | 7.04±0.08 b | 2.86±0.04 b | 45.20±0.29 c | 20.00±0.06 b | 9.33±0.15 ab | |
| CK | 49.02±0.19 a | 7.10±0.11 b | 2.79±0.04 b | 46.49±0.40 bc | 19.89±0.09 b | 9.60±0.23 ab | |
| 成熟期 | C1 | 106.64±0.18 c | 9.52±0.15 a | 6.13±0.10 b | 77.02±0.18 c | 28.38±0.13 c | 18.00±0.25 b |
| C2 | 107.94±0.30 ab | 9.62±0.15 a | 5.78±0.07 c | 78.02±0.19 b | 29.08±0.13 b | 18.30±0.27 b | |
| C3 | 108.77±0.36 a | 9.36±0.14 a | 6.49±0.06 a | 79.49±0.15 a | 29.59±0.14 a | 19.37±0.21 a | |
| C4 | 108.06±0.37 ab | 9.44±0.13 a | 5.90±0.08 bc | 75.77±0.14 d | 28.44±0.14 c | 16.87±0.26 c | |
| C5 | 107.10±0.47 bc | 9.38±0.15 a | 5.91±0.09 bc | 76.13±0.31 d | 29.08±0.12 b | 17.67±0.22 bc | |
| CK | 108.65±0.29 a | 9.28±0.13 a | 6.00±0.07 bc | 78.17±0.18 b | 28.97±0.11 b | 18.37±0.21 b |
Table 3 Agronomic traits of Yunyan 99 under different chemical treatments
| 时期 | 处理 | 株高/cm | 茎围/cm | 节距/cm | 最大叶长/cm | 最大叶宽/cm | 有效叶数 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 旺长期 | C1 | 48.83±0.29 a | 6.83±0.10 b | 2.84±0.02 b | 46.99±0.40 b | 19.44±0.12 b | 9.00±0.19 b |
| C2 | 49.34±0.25 a | 7.08±0.10 b | 2.75±0.04 b | 48.32±0.19 a | 19.75±0.13 b | 9.70±0.27 ab | |
| C3 | 49.50±0.28 a | 7.49±0.08 a | 3.02±0.04 a | 47.41±0.41 ab | 21.98±0.31 a | 10.07±0.27 a | |
| C4 | 48.84±0.25 a | 6.96±0.08 b | 2.78±0.03 b | 46.15±0.41 bc | 19.59±0.11 b | 9.03±0.16 b | |
| C5 | 48.79±0.20 a | 7.04±0.08 b | 2.86±0.04 b | 45.20±0.29 c | 20.00±0.06 b | 9.33±0.15 ab | |
| CK | 49.02±0.19 a | 7.10±0.11 b | 2.79±0.04 b | 46.49±0.40 bc | 19.89±0.09 b | 9.60±0.23 ab | |
| 成熟期 | C1 | 106.64±0.18 c | 9.52±0.15 a | 6.13±0.10 b | 77.02±0.18 c | 28.38±0.13 c | 18.00±0.25 b |
| C2 | 107.94±0.30 ab | 9.62±0.15 a | 5.78±0.07 c | 78.02±0.19 b | 29.08±0.13 b | 18.30±0.27 b | |
| C3 | 108.77±0.36 a | 9.36±0.14 a | 6.49±0.06 a | 79.49±0.15 a | 29.59±0.14 a | 19.37±0.21 a | |
| C4 | 108.06±0.37 ab | 9.44±0.13 a | 5.90±0.08 bc | 75.77±0.14 d | 28.44±0.14 c | 16.87±0.26 c | |
| C5 | 107.10±0.47 bc | 9.38±0.15 a | 5.91±0.09 bc | 76.13±0.31 d | 29.08±0.12 b | 17.67±0.22 bc | |
| CK | 108.65±0.29 a | 9.28±0.13 a | 6.00±0.07 bc | 78.17±0.18 b | 28.97±0.11 b | 18.37±0.21 b |
| 处理 | pH值 | 有机质含量/(g·kg-1) | 全氮含量/(g·kg-1) | 全磷含量/(g·kg-1) | 全钾含量/(g·kg-1) | 水解性氮含量/(mg·kg-1) | 有效磷含量/(mg·kg-1) | 速效钾含量/(mg·kg-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | 6.91±0.09 a | 40.22±1.04 b | 2.19±0.07 a | 2.07±0.06 a | 15.39±0.13 a | 108.61±0.48 c | 47.19±0.59 c | 232.56±1.61 a |
| C2 | 6.81±0.13 a | 44.78±0.30 a | 2.11±0.11 a | 2.06±0.10 a | 15.65±0.05 a | 117.39±1.23 a | 53.30±0.63 a | 231.10±2.61 a |
| C3 | 7.03±0.09 a | 40.49±0.27 b | 2.23±0.16 a | 2.07±0.09 a | 15.77±0.06 a | 103.08±0.87 d | 44.64±0.21 d | 214.66±2.14 b |
| C4 | 6.90±0.06 a | 44.01±0.22 a | 2.11±0.05 a | 2.06±0.06 a | 15.92±0.28 a | 109.31±1.56 bc | 50.04±0.48 b | 236.00±6.43 a |
| C5 | 6.65±0.30 a | 43.79±0.45 a | 2.12±0.04 a | 2.10±0.11 a | 15.95±0.12 a | 112.55±0.78 b | 46.30±0.27 cd | 225.36±3.50 ab |
| CK | 7.01±0.12 a | 40.45±1.25 b | 2.15±0.14 a | 2.04±0.06 a | 15.97±0.23 a | 103.81±1.35 d | 47.90±1.12 bc | 236.10±4.23 a |
Table 4 Soil physical and chemical properties under different chemical treatments
| 处理 | pH值 | 有机质含量/(g·kg-1) | 全氮含量/(g·kg-1) | 全磷含量/(g·kg-1) | 全钾含量/(g·kg-1) | 水解性氮含量/(mg·kg-1) | 有效磷含量/(mg·kg-1) | 速效钾含量/(mg·kg-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | 6.91±0.09 a | 40.22±1.04 b | 2.19±0.07 a | 2.07±0.06 a | 15.39±0.13 a | 108.61±0.48 c | 47.19±0.59 c | 232.56±1.61 a |
| C2 | 6.81±0.13 a | 44.78±0.30 a | 2.11±0.11 a | 2.06±0.10 a | 15.65±0.05 a | 117.39±1.23 a | 53.30±0.63 a | 231.10±2.61 a |
| C3 | 7.03±0.09 a | 40.49±0.27 b | 2.23±0.16 a | 2.07±0.09 a | 15.77±0.06 a | 103.08±0.87 d | 44.64±0.21 d | 214.66±2.14 b |
| C4 | 6.90±0.06 a | 44.01±0.22 a | 2.11±0.05 a | 2.06±0.06 a | 15.92±0.28 a | 109.31±1.56 bc | 50.04±0.48 b | 236.00±6.43 a |
| C5 | 6.65±0.30 a | 43.79±0.45 a | 2.12±0.04 a | 2.10±0.11 a | 15.95±0.12 a | 112.55±0.78 b | 46.30±0.27 cd | 225.36±3.50 ab |
| CK | 7.01±0.12 a | 40.45±1.25 b | 2.15±0.14 a | 2.04±0.06 a | 15.97±0.23 a | 103.81±1.35 d | 47.90±1.12 bc | 236.10±4.23 a |
| [1] | 付博,张洁,张蒙蒙,等. 烟草根结线虫病生防菌株TB-68的鉴定及室内防效测定[J]. 烟草科技,2021,54(7):17-22. |
| FU B, ZHANG J, ZHANG M M,et al. Identification of biocontrol strain TB-68 and its control efficiency against tobacco root knot nematode in greenhouse[J]. Tobacco Science & Technology,2021,54(7):17-22. | |
| [2] | 闫鼎,蔡宪杰,李德文,等. 烟草根结线虫病绿色防控技术研究[J]. 中国农学通报,2023,39(17):86-91. |
| YAN D, CAI X J, LI D W,et al. Research on green prevention and control technology of tobacco root-knot nematode disease[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin,2023,39(17):86-91. | |
| [3] | CAILLAUD M C, DUBREUIL G, QUENTIN M,et al. Root-knot nematodes manipulate plant cell functions during a compatible interaction[J]. Journal of Plant Physiology,2008,165(1):104-113. |
| [4] | 刘阳,李长洋,姚志浩,等. 作物根结线虫病化学防治研究进展[J]. 农药学学报,2024,26(1):8-22. |
| LIU Y, LI C Y, YAO Z H,et al. Advances in chemical control of crop root-knot nematode disease[J]. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science,2024,26(1):8-22. | |
| [5] | 康峥,唐卫迪,杨继利,等. 不同生物菌剂对根结线虫病害地区烟草生长及品质的影响[J]. 中国种业,2024(8):79-86. |
| KANG Z, TANG W D, YANG J L,et al. Effect of various bioagent on the growth and quality of tobacco in nematode-damaged regions[J]. China Seed Industry,2024(8):79-86. | |
| [6] | 李梅云,焦芳婵,曾建敏,等. 不同类型烟草新品种(系)对南方根结线虫的抗性鉴定[J]. 烟草科技,2017,50(11):22-26. |
| LI M Y, JIAO F C, ZENG J M,et al. Characterization of Meloidogyne incognita resistance in new tobacco varieties(lines)[J]. Tobacco Science & Technology,2017,50(11):22-26. | |
| [7] | 夏振远,汪安云,刘春明,等. 烟草根结线虫化学药剂施用技术研究[J]. 安徽农业科学,2014,42(36):13058-13059. |
| XIA Z Y, WANG A Y, LIU C M,et al. Studies on applied technology of chemicals against tobacco root-knot nematode[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences,2014,42(36):13058-13059. | |
| [8] | 胡玉金,冯敏,郭文秀,等. 作物根结线虫病害综合防治技术概述[J]. 山东农业科学,2019,51(4):149-156. |
| HU Y J, FENG M, GUO W X,et al. Overview of integrated control techniques of root-knot nematode disease[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences,2019,51(4):149-156. | |
| [9] | 韩冰洁,张立君,张建君. 作物根结线虫病防治研究进展[J]. 长江蔬菜,2021(22):44-48. |
| HAN B J, ZHANG L J, ZHANG J J. Research progress on control of root-knot nematode disease in crops[J]. Journal of Changjiang Vegetables,2021(22):44-48. | |
| [10] | 张洁,夏明聪,刘红彦,等. 低剂量棉隆熏蒸联合生物菌肥防治黄瓜根结线虫病的应用效果[J]. 植物保护学报,2019,46(4):824-831. |
| ZHANG J, XIA M C, LIU H Y,et al. Efficacy of dazomet fumigation and bioorganic fertilizer in integrated control of cucumber root-knot nematode[J]. Journal of Plant Protection,2019,46(4):824-831. | |
| [11] | 国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会. 烟草病虫害分级及调查方法: [S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2009. |
| [12] | 国家烟草专卖局. 烟草农艺性状调查测量方法: [S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2010. |
| [13] | SANG Y H, REN K, CHEN Y,et al. Integration of soil microbiology and metabolomics to elucidate the mechanism of the accelerated infestation of tobacco by the root-knot nematode[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology,2024,15:1455880. |
| [14] | 闫芳芳,曾庆宾,官宇,等. 猪屎豆与淡紫拟青霉联合防治烟草根结线虫病的效果评价[J]. 中国农学通报,2018,34(9):136-140. |
| YAN F F, ZENG Q B, GUAN Y,et al. Integrated control of tobacco root-knot nematode disease by Crotalaria pallida and Paecilomyces lilacinus [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin,2018,34(9):136-140. | |
| [15] | 查明迪,查友贵,张俊文,等. 4种农药防治烟草根结线虫病田间药效试验[J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学),2021,36(5):783-788. |
| ZHA M D, ZHA Y G, ZHANG J W,et al. Field control efficacy trial of four fungicides against root-knot nematode of tobacco[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University,2021,36(5):783-788. | |
| [16] | 洪发彩,邹倩梅,张敏,等. 药剂对根结线虫病防效及烤烟产质量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报,2024,40(22):131-136. |
| HONG F C, ZOU Q M, ZHANG M,et al. Effect of agents on control of root knot nematode disease and yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin,2024,40(22):131-136. | |
| [17] | 叶田会,闫芳芳,张瑞平,等. 永卫®168与淡紫拟青霉联合防治烟草根结线虫病的效果评价[J]. 安徽农业科学,2020,48(4):132-133. |
| YE T H, YAN F F, ZHANG R P,et al. Integrated control root-knot nematode disease of tobacco by Yongwei® 168 and Paecilomyces lilacinus [J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences,2020,48(4):132-133. | |
| [18] | ZENG R, FANG W S, LI X S,et al. Uniform root layer application at optimal timing can effectively improve root-knot nematode disease control in Rui yam[J]. Agriculture,2022,12(12):2031. |
| [19] | 李琳,刘薇,张倩倩,等. 设施蔬菜根结线虫的综合防治研究进展[J]. 黑龙江农业科学,2024(11):114-120. |
| LI L, LIU W, ZHANG Q Q,et al. Research progress on comprehensive control of root-knot nematodes in facility vegetables[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences,2024(11):114-120. | |
| [20] | 马明敏,李凡,史东. 2种生物农药防治番茄根结线虫田间药效及安全性评价[J]. 农药科学与管理,2023,44(7):51-56. |
| MA M M, LI F, SHI D. Study on the field efficacy and safety of two biopesticide against tomato root-knot nematode[J]. Pesticide Science and Administration,2023,44(7):51-56. |
| [1] | LU Fang, SUN Xie, ZHU Xiaoqun, JIANG Chunyue. Evaluation of contribution rate of plant protection to the prevention and control of wheat disease,pest,and weeds in Haiyan County,2024 [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(4): 976-979. |
| [2] | GU Tianfei, YING Junjie, TANG Sizhong, GU Huifen, CHEN Lingyong, XIANG Jiaqing, ZHU Guiping. Application effect of the key technology of "one spray and three preventions" at the wheat panicle stage in southeast Zhejiang of China [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(2): 449-454. |
| [3] | LIAN Jianjun, XU Hubin, CHENG Ying, ZHANG Junmei, CHEN Xugen, WU Qiqi, DENG Liangdong, JIAO Chen, LI Hongye. Screening of fungicides for control of citrus brown spot caused by Alternaria spp. [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(2): 455-462. |
| [4] | FENG Yifu, NI Ming, WANG Zhizhou, CHEN Hong, FANG Hui. Several types of stem and leaf herbicides for the control effect of weeds in wheat fields in southern Zhejiang [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(9): 2230-2234. |
| [5] | ZHANG Xin, ZHANG Chunhua, WANG Cheng, CHEN Guoqi. Study on the application effect of flufenacet in rice fields [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(9): 2208-2212. |
| [6] | QIAN Cheng, CHEN Zengqian, LIU Xiaotong, WEI Haohua, ZHANG Juan, WANG Ke, YU Xianwen, HUANG Jun. Analysis of the effect of five kinds of chemical agents on the emergency control of Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(6): 1456-1459. |
| [7] | YUAN Zhongqin, GU Guowei. Control effect of different fungicides on wheat scab and prospect for reducing dosage [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(5): 1216-1220. |
| [8] | LUO Qin, YAO Xiaoming, SHOU Menghui, ZHOU Yujie. Evaluation of different adjuvants on the control effect of rice diseases and insect pests by spraying drone [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(4): 986-991. |
| [9] | LIU Min, LIN Ya, ZHANG Jinming. Pathogenicity evaluation of four pathogenic nematodes on Spodoptera exigua at pupal stage [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(4): 1001-1004. |
| [10] | BAI Jianping, XU Weidong, LU Qiang, YAO Zhangliang. Field control effect of 40% prothioconazole·tebuconazole mixture on rice sheath blight [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(2): 437-439. |
| [11] | YU Yanfang, HU Yang, HE Shijie, XU Hongle, LEI Haixia, WANG Xiaoxiao, LI Huilong, ZHU Junde. Evaluation of control effects and crop safety of six herbicides and their combinations against weeds in direct-seeded rice fields [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(2): 430-436. |
| [12] | MAO Jisheng, ZHAO Loujun, ZHANG Xiao, YAO Zhangliang, LU Qiang, XU Weidong. Study on control effects of different compound herbicides against annual weeds in wheat fields [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(10): 2436-2439. |
| [13] | QI Zaihua, CHEN Hong, CAI Jianjun, PAN Wei, FENG Yifu, WANG Enguo. Study of the control effect of 80% monosultap soluble powder against borer pest by unmanned aerial vehicle in early rice [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(10): 2440-2443. |
| [14] | HUANG Qian. Control effects of different concentrations of two herbicides, single agent and compound agent on broad-leaved weeds in rapeseed field [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(1): 158-162. |
| [15] | LIU Pengfei, QIN Weiming, ZHANG Yizhi, WU Yuefu, WANG Hongli, QI He, LOU Binggan. Field efficacy trials of 22 fungicides against pear fire blight [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(9): 2152-2159. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||