浙江农业科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (10): 2340-2346.DOI: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20240821

• 粮食作物 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同玉米花生间作模式对系统产量的影响

李霞(), 程智敏, 杨苹, 蔡毅, 李有辉, 黄胜, 唐明   

  1. 宜宾市农业科学院,四川 宜宾 644600
  • 收稿日期:2024-10-25 出版日期:2025-10-11 发布日期:2025-10-21
  • 通讯作者: 唐明(1986—),男,四川乐山人,副研究员,硕士,主要从事花生和烟草育种与栽培研究,498001110@qq.com。
  • 作者简介:李霞(1996—),女,四川内江人,研究实习员,硕士,主要从事花生和烟草育种与栽培研究,2383550719@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    宜宾市2023年农业科技专项

Effect of different intercropping patterns of maize and peanut on system yield

LI Xia(), CHENG Zhimin, YANG Ping, CAI Yi, LI Youhui, HUANG Sheng, TANG Ming   

  1. Yibin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Yibin 644600, Sichuan
  • Received:2024-10-25 Online:2025-10-11 Published:2025-10-21

摘要:

为明确玉米花生间作不同行比配置下玉米和花生的生育期、农艺性状和产量、土地当量比的差异,探究最佳的玉米花生间作模式,进一步促进玉米花生间作种植技术的推广应用,本试验设置6种种植模式,即玉米单作(SM)、花生单作(SP)、玉米花生间作行比2∶4(M2P4)、2∶6(M2P6)、3∶4(M3P4)、3∶8(M3P8)。结果表明,与单作相比,间作玉米生育期无差异,间作花生生育期有所延长;间作玉米的株高、穗位高、穗长、行粒数、百粒重均小于单作,间作花生主茎长、侧枝长、总分枝数、结果枝数、单株荚果数、百果重、百仁重和饱果率均小于单作;间作玉米和花生产量均低于单作,但4种间作模式的土地当量比均大于1,其中M2P6最高,且群体产量最大。综上,M2P6即2行玉米//6行花生模式具有明显的间作优势。

关键词: 玉米花生间作, 行比配置, 产量, 土地当量比, 间作优势

Abstract:

To clarify the differences in the growth period, agronomic traits, yield and land equivalent ratio of maize and peanut under different row ratio configurations in maize and peanut intercropping, explore the optimal maize and peanut intercropping model, and further promote the popularization and application of maize and peanut intercropping planting technology, this experiment established six planting patterns: monoculture of maize (SM), monoculture of peanut (SP), and maize-peanut intercropping with row ratios of 2∶4 (M2P4), 2∶6 (M2P6), 3∶4 (M3P4), and 3∶8 (M3P8). The results indicated that, compared with monoculture, the growth period of intercropped maize remained unchanged, while the growth period of intercropped peanut was extended. The plant height, ear height, ear length, kernal number per row, and 100-grain weight of intercropped maize were all lower than those of monoculture. The main stem, lateral branch lengths, the total number of branches, number of fruiting branches, number of pods per plant, 100-fruit weight, 100-kernel weight, and full fruit rate of intercropped peanut were all lower than those of monoculture. The yields of both maize and peanut in intercropping were lower than those in monoculture. However, the land equivalent ratios of the four intercropping patterns were all greater than 1, among which M2P6 was the highest and the group yield was the largest. In conclusion, the M2P6 (2 rows of maize/6 rows of peanut) intercropping pattern has obvious intercropping advantages.

Key words: maize-peanut intercropping, row ratio configuration, yield, land equivalent ratio, intercropping advantage

中图分类号: