Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2024, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (7): 1687-1694.DOI: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20230629
Previous Articles Next Articles
XU Huan1(), GUO Zuchuang2, LIU Ruimin1, SHAO Shengzhi2, YUAN Yuwei2, LI Chunlin2,*(
)
Received:
2023-06-07
Online:
2024-07-11
Published:
2024-07-17
CLC Number:
XU Huan, GUO Zuchuang, LIU Ruimin, SHAO Shengzhi, YUAN Yuwei, LI Chunlin. Quality and stable isotope characteristics and identification of Wuyi organic tea[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(7): 1687-1694.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnykx.cn/EN/10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20230629
栽培方式 | 肥料种类 | 早春 | 晚春 | 小计 |
---|---|---|---|---|
常规栽培 | 化肥 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
有机栽培 | 菜籽饼 | 3 | 3 | 18 |
商品有机肥(0~5 a) | 3 | 3 | ||
商品有机肥(>5~10 a) | 0 | 3 | ||
商品有机肥(>10 a) | 0 | 3 | ||
合计 | 9 | 15 | 24 |
Table 1 Tea sampling information
栽培方式 | 肥料种类 | 早春 | 晚春 | 小计 |
---|---|---|---|---|
常规栽培 | 化肥 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
有机栽培 | 菜籽饼 | 3 | 3 | 18 |
商品有机肥(0~5 a) | 3 | 3 | ||
商品有机肥(>5~10 a) | 0 | 3 | ||
商品有机肥(>10 a) | 0 | 3 | ||
合计 | 9 | 15 | 24 |
肥料种类 | 早春 | 晚春 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
水浸出物含量 | 茶多酚含量 | 游离氨基酸含量 | 水浸出物含量 | 茶多酚含量 | 游离氨基酸含量 | ||
化肥 | 50.7±0.2 | 20.3±0.1 | 4.8±0.0 | 45.6±0.3 | 15.2±0.0 | 2.4±0.2 | |
菜籽饼 | 50.1±0.3 | 16.3±0.1 | 5.2±0.2 | 48.5±1.3 | 17.2±0.9 | 3.1±0.3 | |
商品有机肥 | 49.5±0.3 | 18.0±0.1 | 6.1±0.2 | 47.2±0.3 | 15.5±0.5 | 3.2±0.3 |
Table 2 Content of quality chemical composition of early spring tea and late spring tea with different fertilizer types 单位:%
肥料种类 | 早春 | 晚春 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
水浸出物含量 | 茶多酚含量 | 游离氨基酸含量 | 水浸出物含量 | 茶多酚含量 | 游离氨基酸含量 | ||
化肥 | 50.7±0.2 | 20.3±0.1 | 4.8±0.0 | 45.6±0.3 | 15.2±0.0 | 2.4±0.2 | |
菜籽饼 | 50.1±0.3 | 16.3±0.1 | 5.2±0.2 | 48.5±1.3 | 17.2±0.9 | 3.1±0.3 | |
商品有机肥 | 49.5±0.3 | 18.0±0.1 | 6.1±0.2 | 47.2±0.3 | 15.5±0.5 | 3.2±0.3 |
肥料种类 | 外形 | 汤色 | 香气 | 滋味 | 叶底 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
化肥 | 条索紧结,略曲,有毫,略有锋苗,稍带朴,深绿稍偏黄尚润 | 较嫩绿明亮 | 较高,略有嫩香 | 尚醇,微涩(欠鲜爽) | 较嫩软,有芽,有嫩茎、摊张,较绿亮 |
菜籽饼 | 条索紧实,略曲,带茎梗、朴片,深绿稍偏黄尚润 | 尚绿亮 | 较高爽,尚鲜,有嫩香,略有花香 | 较醇,尚厚,较清鲜 | 尚嫩,多嫩茎、摊张,尚绿亮 |
商品有机肥 | 条索紧结,较壮,显毫,有锋苗,深绿稍偏黄尚润 | 尚嫩绿(偏黄)明亮 | 较高,有嫩香,略有花香,略熟闷 | 醇厚,尚鲜,微熟甜 | 较细嫩,多芽,较嫩绿亮 |
Table 3 Sensory evaluation results of early spring tea with different fertilizer types
肥料种类 | 外形 | 汤色 | 香气 | 滋味 | 叶底 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
化肥 | 条索紧结,略曲,有毫,略有锋苗,稍带朴,深绿稍偏黄尚润 | 较嫩绿明亮 | 较高,略有嫩香 | 尚醇,微涩(欠鲜爽) | 较嫩软,有芽,有嫩茎、摊张,较绿亮 |
菜籽饼 | 条索紧实,略曲,带茎梗、朴片,深绿稍偏黄尚润 | 尚绿亮 | 较高爽,尚鲜,有嫩香,略有花香 | 较醇,尚厚,较清鲜 | 尚嫩,多嫩茎、摊张,尚绿亮 |
商品有机肥 | 条索紧结,较壮,显毫,有锋苗,深绿稍偏黄尚润 | 尚嫩绿(偏黄)明亮 | 较高,有嫩香,略有花香,略熟闷 | 醇厚,尚鲜,微熟甜 | 较细嫩,多芽,较嫩绿亮 |
肥料种类 | 早春 | 晚春 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C含量/% | N含量/% | δ13C含量/‰ | δ15N含量/‰ | C含量/% | N含量/% | δ13C含量/‰ | δ15N含量/‰ | ||
化肥 | 47.83±0.31 | 5.17±0.15 | -27.07±0.21 | 1.10±0.44 | 47.57±0.21 | 3.20±0.10 | -26.80±0.10 | -0.73±0.06 | |
菜籽饼 | 48.03±0.40 | 5.87±0.06 | -28.37±0.06 | 2.70±0.10 | 48.03±0.35 | 4.27±0.12 | -27.57±0.06 | 4.47±0.15 | |
商品有机肥 | 47.20±0.10 | 6.07±0.12 | -24.47±0.40 | 1.87±0.21 | 48.13±0.23 | 3.97±0.06 | -26.47±0.12 | 2.30±0.52 |
Table 4 Carbon and nitrogen element composition of early spring tea and late spring tea with different fertilizer types
肥料种类 | 早春 | 晚春 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C含量/% | N含量/% | δ13C含量/‰ | δ15N含量/‰ | C含量/% | N含量/% | δ13C含量/‰ | δ15N含量/‰ | ||
化肥 | 47.83±0.31 | 5.17±0.15 | -27.07±0.21 | 1.10±0.44 | 47.57±0.21 | 3.20±0.10 | -26.80±0.10 | -0.73±0.06 | |
菜籽饼 | 48.03±0.40 | 5.87±0.06 | -28.37±0.06 | 2.70±0.10 | 48.03±0.35 | 4.27±0.12 | -27.57±0.06 | 4.47±0.15 | |
商品有机肥 | 47.20±0.10 | 6.07±0.12 | -24.47±0.40 | 1.87±0.21 | 48.13±0.23 | 3.97±0.06 | -26.47±0.12 | 2.30±0.52 |
有机栽培 年限/a | 水浸出物含量/ % | 茶多酚含量/ % | 游离氨基酸 含量/% | C含量/ % | N含量/ % | δ13C含量/ ‰ | δ15N含量/ ‰ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0~5 | 47.2±0.3 a | 15.5±0.5 b | 3.2±0.3 ab | 48.13±0.23 a | 3.97±0.06 b | -26.47±0.12 a | 2.30±0.52 a |
>5~10 | 48.8±0.8 a | 17.3±0.8 a | 3.4±0.2 a | 48.10±0.52 a | 4.27±0.06 a | -27.47±0.15 b | 2.50±0.46 a |
>10 | 44.6±1.9 b | 15.0±1.0 b | 2.8±0.3 b | 47.67±0.47 a | 3.27±0.06 c | -28.83±0.06 c | 2.93±0.12 a |
Table 5 Quality chemical composition and carbon and nitrogen composition of samples from different organic cultivation years
有机栽培 年限/a | 水浸出物含量/ % | 茶多酚含量/ % | 游离氨基酸 含量/% | C含量/ % | N含量/ % | δ13C含量/ ‰ | δ15N含量/ ‰ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0~5 | 47.2±0.3 a | 15.5±0.5 b | 3.2±0.3 ab | 48.13±0.23 a | 3.97±0.06 b | -26.47±0.12 a | 2.30±0.52 a |
>5~10 | 48.8±0.8 a | 17.3±0.8 a | 3.4±0.2 a | 48.10±0.52 a | 4.27±0.06 a | -27.47±0.15 b | 2.50±0.46 a |
>10 | 44.6±1.9 b | 15.0±1.0 b | 2.8±0.3 b | 47.67±0.47 a | 3.27±0.06 c | -28.83±0.06 c | 2.93±0.12 a |
真实/预测 | 常规栽培 | 有机栽培 | 合计 | 准确率/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
常规栽培 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 100.00 |
有机栽培 | 0 | 18 | 18 | 100.00 |
全部 | 6 | 18 | 24 | 100.00 |
Table 6 Organic tea discrimination model results
真实/预测 | 常规栽培 | 有机栽培 | 合计 | 准确率/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
常规栽培 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 100.00 |
有机栽培 | 0 | 18 | 18 | 100.00 |
全部 | 6 | 18 | 24 | 100.00 |
[1] | 周小芬, 徐文武. 武义有机茶产业特色与发展对策[J]. 新农村, 2022(4):13-15. |
[2] | 祝凌平, 胡强. 武义县茶产业可持续发展分析[J]. 中国茶叶, 2019, 41(4):52-56. |
[3] | 邹婷婷. 农产品区域品牌形象和企业有机品牌形象对有机品牌信任的影响: 以英德红茶和T三品牌为例[D]. 广州: 广东外语外贸大学, 2018. |
[4] | 李刚, 王磊, 肖兴基, 等. 有机茶与常规茶中主要口感与功能成分的测定与比较[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2015, 43(27):251-253. |
[5] | 陈检锋, 杨向德, 马立锋, 等. 有机肥替代部分化肥对云南大叶茶产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国茶叶, 2022, 44(10):49-54. |
[6] | 孙洁. 饮茶与中老年人健康[J]. 福建茶叶, 2021, 43(6):46-47. |
[7] | 李阳, 吕品, 姚星, 等. 有机茶与普通茶中主要功能成分的测定与比较[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2013, 52(1):180-183. |
[8] | LIU Z, YUAN Y W, XIE T Z, et al. Long-term agricultural effects on the authentication accuracy of organic, green, and conventional rice using isotopic and elemental chemometric analyses[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2020, 68(5):1213-1225. |
[9] | NAKANO A, JOHKAN M, UEHARA Y. Identification of cultivation methods and the geographical origin of sweet pepper based on δ15N values and mineral contents[J]. Bulletin of the National Institute of Vegetable & Tea Science, 2010. |
[10] | RAPISARDA P, CALABRETTA M L, ROMANO G, et al. Nitrogen metabolism components as a tool to discriminate between organic and conventional citrus fruits[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2005, 53(7): 2664-2669. |
[11] | BENINCASA C, PELLEGRINO M, PERRI E. The use of nitrogen stable isotope ratios to discriminate between organic and conventional olive cultivation[J]. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture, 2018, 30(7):638-643. |
[12] | BATEMAN A S, KELLY S D, JICKELLS T D. Nitrogen isotope relationships between crops and fertilizer: implications for using nitrogen isotope analysis as an indicator of agricultural regime[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2005, 53(14): 5760-5765. |
[13] | 袁玉伟, 张志恒, 杨桂玲, 等. 氮稳定同位素的印迹规律与有机食品鉴别[J]. 核农学报, 2009, 23(4):659-663. |
[14] | BATEMAN A S, KELLY S D, WOOLFE M. Nitrogen isotope composition of organically and conventionally grown crops[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2007, 55(7): 2664-2670. |
[15] | HAYASHI N, UJIHARA T, TANAKA E, et al. Annual variation of natural 15N abundance in tea leaves and its practicality as an organic tea indicator[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2011, 59(18): 10317-10321. |
[16] | CORNWELL W K, WRIGHT I J, TURNER J, et al. Climate and soils together regulate photosynthetic carbon isotope discrimination within C3 plants worldwide[J]. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2018, 27(9): 1056-1067. |
[17] | 李维, 向芬, 周凌云, 等. 氮素减施对茶树光合作用和氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(1):93-98. |
[18] | YUAN Y W, ZHANG W X, ZHANG Y Z, et al. Differentiating organically farmed rice from conventional and green rice harvested from an experimental field trial using stable isotopes and multi-element chemometrics[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2018, 66(11): 2607-2615. |
[19] | 陈彦峰, 吴晓蓉, 刘展良, 等. 有机单丛茶与常规单丛茶感官与品质成分分析研究[J]. 广东茶业, 2021(4):18-20. |
[20] | 刘健伟. 基于组学技术研究氮素对于茶树碳氮代谢及主要品质成分生物合成的影响[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2016. |
[21] | ROGERS K M. Nitrogen isotopes as a screening tool to determine the growing regimen of some organic and nonorganic supermarket produce from New Zealand[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2008, 56(11): 4078-4083. |
[22] | YUAN Y W, HU G X, CHEN T J, et al. Improved discrimination for Brassica vegetables treated with agricultural fertilizers using a combined chemometric approach[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2016, 64(28): 5633-5643. |
[1] | LI Jinlong, LONG Yaqin, YIN Liqiong, TONG Jiayin, LUO Ziwen, QU Hao, LIU Fuqiao, CHEN Linbo. Differential analysis of internal substances in tea under different tree management modes [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(7): 1567-1570. |
[2] | WU Lintu, XU Huozhong, LI Guisong, YE Chunfu, HE Jinfa, WANG Yunxiang, PAN Yingjie, WANG Yueyuan, YE Zhengqian. Effects of different passivators on soil and tea quality in tea plantations [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(7): 1571-1577. |
[3] | XIANG Shuyan, ZHAN Lichuan, ZHOU Qingwei, JIN Meiqing, WU Weihong, FU Li. Study on the difference of soil properties in different tea planting years [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(6): 1364-1369. |
[4] | QIU Xiaoying, CAO Siyu, CHEN Haodong, LIN Jie, LIANG Xiuhua. Digital analysis of the color space of strip- and spiral-shaped black tea made from Huangjinya and population resources [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(6): 1445-1450. |
[5] | NING Jianmei, XU Xiaoan, TANG Shiqin, PAN Yingjie. Simultaneous determination of 16 elements in tea by nitric acid extraction inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(6): 1457-1462. |
[6] | LI Guisong, WU Lintu, XU Huozhong, WANG Yunxiang, ZHOU Ling'ai, TANG Shiqin, LIU Qiming, HE Jinfa, CHI Yongqing. Effects of different microbial fertilizer and its dosage on soil and tea quality in tea garden [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(5): 1208-1214. |
[7] | QIU Xiaoying. Tea cultivars registration status and main characteristics of high-quality germplasm resources of tea plants in China [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(5): 1215-1223. |
[8] | CHEN Junrui, SHI Yuanzhi, HU Junming, WEI Xianghua, ZHANG Junhui, ZHENG Fuhai, SUO Guangli. Transformation path and current situation of science and technology support in Guangxi tea industry [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(5): 1224-1231. |
[9] | Dongxing WANG, Juanhua TAO, Qiwei SHI, Yanan WANG, Jinchuan MA. Effects of different combinations of organic fertilizers and chemical fertilizers on tea yield and quality [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(2): 296-300. |
[10] | . [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 64(12): 2875-2878. |
[11] | . [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 64(10): 2474-2477. |
[12] | . [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 64(10): 2505-2509. |
[13] | . [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 64(10): 2525-2532. |
[14] | . [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 64(9): 2266-2269. |
[15] | . [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 64(8): 1854-1857. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||