
Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2026, Vol. 67 ›› Issue (1): 99-104.DOI: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20240770
Previous Articles Next Articles
YANG Xinyao1,2(
), WEN Chao1,*(
)
Received:2024-09-26
Online:2026-01-11
Published:2026-01-19
Contact:
WEN Chao
CLC Number:
YANG Xinyao, WEN Chao. Heredity analysis of leaf characters in Chrysanthemum morifolium[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(1): 99-104.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnykx.cn/EN/10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20240770
| 指标 | 平均值 | 标准差 | 最大值 | 最小值 | 极差 | 变异系数/% | 偏度 | 峰度 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 叶长/cm | 7.45 | 1.19 | 9.93 | 4.10 | 5.83 | 16.01 | -0.28 | -0.29 |
| 叶宽/cm | 5.82 | 1.00 | 8.69 | 3.58 | 5.11 | 17.24 | 0.20 | -0.14 |
| 叶最宽处所在位置/cm | 4.84 | 0.90 | 6.80 | 2.85 | 3.95 | 18.65 | -0.07 | -0.62 |
| 叶柄长/cm | 2.58 | 0.53 | 4.24 | 1.31 | 2.93 | 20.64 | 0.32 | 0.09 |
| 顶裂片长/cm | 2.53 | 0.67 | 4.70 | 0.83 | 3.87 | 26.48 | 0.24 | 0.37 |
| 左上裂片长/cm | 1.20 | 0.45 | 2.62 | 0.28 | 2.34 | 37.72 | 0.50 | 0.02 |
| 左下裂片长/cm | 1.68 | 0.57 | 3.21 | 0.25 | 2.96 | 33.94 | 0.06 | -0.47 |
| 右上裂片长/cm | 1.19 | 0.43 | 2.60 | 0.29 | 2.31 | 36.33 | 0.28 | -0.14 |
| 右下裂片长/cm | 1.59 | 0.55 | 3.19 | 0.24 | 2.95 | 34.91 | 0.18 | -0.24 |
| 顶裂片宽/cm | 2.06 | 0.43 | 3.44 | 1.03 | 2.41 | 20.72 | 0.46 | 0.64 |
| 左上裂片宽/cm | 1.59 | 0.33 | 2.63 | 0.66 | 1.97 | 20.76 | 0.33 | 0.38 |
| 左下裂片宽/cm | 1.87 | 0.48 | 3.82 | 0.40 | 3.42 | 25.58 | 0.44 | 1.49 |
| 右上裂片宽/cm | 1.49 | 0.30 | 2.49 | 0.67 | 1.82 | 20.29 | 0.34 | 0.34 |
| 右下裂片宽/cm | 1.72 | 0.48 | 4.01 | 0.69 | 3.32 | 27.81 | 0.75 | 1.93 |
| 左上叶脉长/cm | 3.93 | 0.71 | 6.21 | 2.42 | 3.79 | 17.98 | 0.19 | -0.05 |
| 左下叶脉长/cm | 3.87 | 0.72 | 5.89 | 1.91 | 3.98 | 18.66 | 0.00 | -0.30 |
| 右上叶脉长/cm | 4.00 | 0.68 | 5.92 | 2.08 | 3.84 | 17.02 | 0.01 | -0.14 |
| 右下叶脉长/cm | 3.82 | 0.70 | 5.77 | 2.19 | 3.58 | 18.43 | 0.17 | -0.32 |
| 锯齿数 | 36.49 | 8.66 | 69.00 | 14.00 | 55.00 | 23.72 | 0.34 | 0.78 |
| 叶长/叶宽 | 1.29 | 0.14 | 1.73 | 0.97 | 0.76 | 11.16 | 0.32 | -0.12 |
| 叶最宽处所在位置/叶长 | 0.65 | 0.07 | 0.83 | 0.41 | 0.42 | 10.79 | -0.45 | 0.66 |
| 顶裂片长/叶长 | 0.34 | 0.06 | 0.51 | 0.16 | 0.35 | 18.31 | 0.18 | 0.25 |
| 顶裂片长/顶裂片宽 | 1.26 | 0.38 | 2.77 | 0.47 | 2.30 | 29.78 | 1.16 | 2.30 |
| 左上裂片长/左上裂片宽 | 0.75 | 0.25 | 1.96 | 0.28 | 1.68 | 32.78 | 1.13 | 2.67 |
| 左下裂片长/左下裂片宽 | 0.92 | 0.32 | 2.67 | 0.30 | 2.37 | 35.22 | 1.62 | 5.12 |
| 右上裂片长/右上裂片宽 | 0.81 | 0.29 | 1.63 | 0.28 | 1.35 | 35.75 | 0.74 | 0.38 |
| 右下裂片长/右下裂片宽 | 0.95 | 0.34 | 2.29 | 0.34 | 1.95 | 35.48 | 1.01 | 1.75 |
| 左上裂片长/左上叶脉长 | 0.30 | 0.09 | 0.60 | 0.11 | 0.49 | 28.34 | 0.19 | 0.03 |
| 左下裂片长/左下叶脉长 | 0.43 | 0.11 | 0.71 | 0.09 | 0.62 | 25.48 | -0.08 | -0.07 |
| 右上裂片长/右上叶脉长 | 0.29 | 0.08 | 0.53 | 0.09 | 0.44 | 28.70 | -0.03 | -0.41 |
| 右下裂片长/右下叶脉长 | 0.41 | 0.11 | 0.71 | 0.09 | 0.62 | 26.60 | -0.04 | 0.24 |
Table 1 Statistics of leaf traits of F1 offspring population of Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat.
| 指标 | 平均值 | 标准差 | 最大值 | 最小值 | 极差 | 变异系数/% | 偏度 | 峰度 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 叶长/cm | 7.45 | 1.19 | 9.93 | 4.10 | 5.83 | 16.01 | -0.28 | -0.29 |
| 叶宽/cm | 5.82 | 1.00 | 8.69 | 3.58 | 5.11 | 17.24 | 0.20 | -0.14 |
| 叶最宽处所在位置/cm | 4.84 | 0.90 | 6.80 | 2.85 | 3.95 | 18.65 | -0.07 | -0.62 |
| 叶柄长/cm | 2.58 | 0.53 | 4.24 | 1.31 | 2.93 | 20.64 | 0.32 | 0.09 |
| 顶裂片长/cm | 2.53 | 0.67 | 4.70 | 0.83 | 3.87 | 26.48 | 0.24 | 0.37 |
| 左上裂片长/cm | 1.20 | 0.45 | 2.62 | 0.28 | 2.34 | 37.72 | 0.50 | 0.02 |
| 左下裂片长/cm | 1.68 | 0.57 | 3.21 | 0.25 | 2.96 | 33.94 | 0.06 | -0.47 |
| 右上裂片长/cm | 1.19 | 0.43 | 2.60 | 0.29 | 2.31 | 36.33 | 0.28 | -0.14 |
| 右下裂片长/cm | 1.59 | 0.55 | 3.19 | 0.24 | 2.95 | 34.91 | 0.18 | -0.24 |
| 顶裂片宽/cm | 2.06 | 0.43 | 3.44 | 1.03 | 2.41 | 20.72 | 0.46 | 0.64 |
| 左上裂片宽/cm | 1.59 | 0.33 | 2.63 | 0.66 | 1.97 | 20.76 | 0.33 | 0.38 |
| 左下裂片宽/cm | 1.87 | 0.48 | 3.82 | 0.40 | 3.42 | 25.58 | 0.44 | 1.49 |
| 右上裂片宽/cm | 1.49 | 0.30 | 2.49 | 0.67 | 1.82 | 20.29 | 0.34 | 0.34 |
| 右下裂片宽/cm | 1.72 | 0.48 | 4.01 | 0.69 | 3.32 | 27.81 | 0.75 | 1.93 |
| 左上叶脉长/cm | 3.93 | 0.71 | 6.21 | 2.42 | 3.79 | 17.98 | 0.19 | -0.05 |
| 左下叶脉长/cm | 3.87 | 0.72 | 5.89 | 1.91 | 3.98 | 18.66 | 0.00 | -0.30 |
| 右上叶脉长/cm | 4.00 | 0.68 | 5.92 | 2.08 | 3.84 | 17.02 | 0.01 | -0.14 |
| 右下叶脉长/cm | 3.82 | 0.70 | 5.77 | 2.19 | 3.58 | 18.43 | 0.17 | -0.32 |
| 锯齿数 | 36.49 | 8.66 | 69.00 | 14.00 | 55.00 | 23.72 | 0.34 | 0.78 |
| 叶长/叶宽 | 1.29 | 0.14 | 1.73 | 0.97 | 0.76 | 11.16 | 0.32 | -0.12 |
| 叶最宽处所在位置/叶长 | 0.65 | 0.07 | 0.83 | 0.41 | 0.42 | 10.79 | -0.45 | 0.66 |
| 顶裂片长/叶长 | 0.34 | 0.06 | 0.51 | 0.16 | 0.35 | 18.31 | 0.18 | 0.25 |
| 顶裂片长/顶裂片宽 | 1.26 | 0.38 | 2.77 | 0.47 | 2.30 | 29.78 | 1.16 | 2.30 |
| 左上裂片长/左上裂片宽 | 0.75 | 0.25 | 1.96 | 0.28 | 1.68 | 32.78 | 1.13 | 2.67 |
| 左下裂片长/左下裂片宽 | 0.92 | 0.32 | 2.67 | 0.30 | 2.37 | 35.22 | 1.62 | 5.12 |
| 右上裂片长/右上裂片宽 | 0.81 | 0.29 | 1.63 | 0.28 | 1.35 | 35.75 | 0.74 | 0.38 |
| 右下裂片长/右下裂片宽 | 0.95 | 0.34 | 2.29 | 0.34 | 1.95 | 35.48 | 1.01 | 1.75 |
| 左上裂片长/左上叶脉长 | 0.30 | 0.09 | 0.60 | 0.11 | 0.49 | 28.34 | 0.19 | 0.03 |
| 左下裂片长/左下叶脉长 | 0.43 | 0.11 | 0.71 | 0.09 | 0.62 | 25.48 | -0.08 | -0.07 |
| 右上裂片长/右上叶脉长 | 0.29 | 0.08 | 0.53 | 0.09 | 0.44 | 28.70 | -0.03 | -0.41 |
| 右下裂片长/右下叶脉长 | 0.41 | 0.11 | 0.71 | 0.09 | 0.62 | 26.60 | -0.04 | 0.24 |
| 指标 | 亲本叶片 | F1代叶片 | F1代平均值占亲 本中值的比例/% | 分布比例/% | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 母本 | 父本 | 亲本中值 | 平均值 | 变异系数/% | 极值 | 超低亲 | 双亲之间 | 超高亲 | ||
| 叶长/叶宽 | 1.53 | 1.34 | 1.44 | 1.29 | 11.16 | 0.97~1.73 | 90 | 64.74 | 30.00 | 5.26 |
| 叶最宽处所在位置/叶长 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.65 | 10.79 | 0.41~0.83 | 103 | 30.00 | 10.53 | 59.47 |
| 顶裂片长/叶长 | 0.38 | 0.34 | 0.36 | 0.34 | 18.31 | 0.16~0.51 | 94 | 54.21 | 23.16 | 22.63 |
| 顶裂片长/顶裂片宽 | 1.44 | 1.34 | 1.39 | 1.26 | 29.78 | 0.47~2.77 | 91 | 65.79 | 8.95 | 25.26 |
| 左上裂片长/左上裂片宽 | 0.70 | 0.84 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 32.78 | 0.28~1.96 | 97 | 45.26 | 22.63 | 32.11 |
| 左下裂片长/左下裂片宽 | 0.82 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.92 | 35.22 | 0.30~2.67 | 111 | 42.11 | 0 | 57.89 |
| 右上裂片长/右上裂片宽 | 0.82 | 0.79 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 35.75 | 0.28~1.63 | 100 | 55.26 | 2.63 | 42.11 |
| 右下裂片长/右下裂片宽 | 0.94 | 1.09 | 1.02 | 0.95 | 35.48 | 0.34~2.29 | 93 | 55.79 | 17.37 | 26.84 |
| 左上裂片长/左上叶脉长 | 0.30 | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.30 | 28.34 | 0.11~0.60 | 97 | 47.89 | 5.79 | 46.32 |
| 左下裂片长/左下叶脉长 | 0.38 | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.43 | 25.48 | 0.09~0.71 | 110 | 38.42 | 1.58 | 60.00 |
| 右上裂片长/右上叶脉长 | 0.32 | 0.27 | 0.30 | 0.29 | 28.70 | 0.09~0.53 | 97 | 34.21 | 28.95 | 36.84 |
| 右下裂片长/右下叶脉长 | 0.41 | 0.43 | 0.42 | 0.41 | 26.60 | 0.09~0.71 | 98 | 50.00 | 5.79 | 44.21 |
| 总体 | 98 | 48.64 | 13.11 | 38.25 | ||||||
Table 2 Heredity characteristics of structural parameters of leaf in F1 offspring population of Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat.
| 指标 | 亲本叶片 | F1代叶片 | F1代平均值占亲 本中值的比例/% | 分布比例/% | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 母本 | 父本 | 亲本中值 | 平均值 | 变异系数/% | 极值 | 超低亲 | 双亲之间 | 超高亲 | ||
| 叶长/叶宽 | 1.53 | 1.34 | 1.44 | 1.29 | 11.16 | 0.97~1.73 | 90 | 64.74 | 30.00 | 5.26 |
| 叶最宽处所在位置/叶长 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.65 | 10.79 | 0.41~0.83 | 103 | 30.00 | 10.53 | 59.47 |
| 顶裂片长/叶长 | 0.38 | 0.34 | 0.36 | 0.34 | 18.31 | 0.16~0.51 | 94 | 54.21 | 23.16 | 22.63 |
| 顶裂片长/顶裂片宽 | 1.44 | 1.34 | 1.39 | 1.26 | 29.78 | 0.47~2.77 | 91 | 65.79 | 8.95 | 25.26 |
| 左上裂片长/左上裂片宽 | 0.70 | 0.84 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 32.78 | 0.28~1.96 | 97 | 45.26 | 22.63 | 32.11 |
| 左下裂片长/左下裂片宽 | 0.82 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.92 | 35.22 | 0.30~2.67 | 111 | 42.11 | 0 | 57.89 |
| 右上裂片长/右上裂片宽 | 0.82 | 0.79 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 35.75 | 0.28~1.63 | 100 | 55.26 | 2.63 | 42.11 |
| 右下裂片长/右下裂片宽 | 0.94 | 1.09 | 1.02 | 0.95 | 35.48 | 0.34~2.29 | 93 | 55.79 | 17.37 | 26.84 |
| 左上裂片长/左上叶脉长 | 0.30 | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.30 | 28.34 | 0.11~0.60 | 97 | 47.89 | 5.79 | 46.32 |
| 左下裂片长/左下叶脉长 | 0.38 | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.43 | 25.48 | 0.09~0.71 | 110 | 38.42 | 1.58 | 60.00 |
| 右上裂片长/右上叶脉长 | 0.32 | 0.27 | 0.30 | 0.29 | 28.70 | 0.09~0.53 | 97 | 34.21 | 28.95 | 36.84 |
| 右下裂片长/右下叶脉长 | 0.41 | 0.43 | 0.42 | 0.41 | 26.60 | 0.09~0.71 | 98 | 50.00 | 5.79 | 44.21 |
| 总体 | 98 | 48.64 | 13.11 | 38.25 | ||||||
| 性状 | 叶长 | 叶宽 | 叶最宽处 所在位置 | 叶柄长 | 锯齿数 | 叶长/叶宽 | 叶最宽处所在 位置/叶长 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 叶宽 | 0.783** | ||||||
| 叶最宽处所在位置 | 0.815** | 0.748** | |||||
| 叶柄长 | 0.211** | 0.245** | 0.185* | ||||
| 锯齿数 | 0.437** | 0.365** | 0.407** | -0.029 | |||
| 叶长/叶宽 | 0.251** | -0.395** | 0.032 | -0.082 | 0.067 | ||
| 叶最宽处所在位置/叶长 | -0.087 | 0.128 | 0.500** | 0 | 0.055 | -0.339** | |
| 叶柄长/叶长 | -0.532** | -0.346** | -0.425** | 0.698** | -0.354** | -0.260** | 0.060 |
Table 3 Correleation of 8 characters in F1 offspring population of Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat.
| 性状 | 叶长 | 叶宽 | 叶最宽处 所在位置 | 叶柄长 | 锯齿数 | 叶长/叶宽 | 叶最宽处所在 位置/叶长 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 叶宽 | 0.783** | ||||||
| 叶最宽处所在位置 | 0.815** | 0.748** | |||||
| 叶柄长 | 0.211** | 0.245** | 0.185* | ||||
| 锯齿数 | 0.437** | 0.365** | 0.407** | -0.029 | |||
| 叶长/叶宽 | 0.251** | -0.395** | 0.032 | -0.082 | 0.067 | ||
| 叶最宽处所在位置/叶长 | -0.087 | 0.128 | 0.500** | 0 | 0.055 | -0.339** | |
| 叶柄长/叶长 | -0.532** | -0.346** | -0.425** | 0.698** | -0.354** | -0.260** | 0.060 |
| [1] | 董燕. 2022年花卉进出口增长创新高: 全国花卉进出口数据分析[J]. 中国花卉园艺, 2023(4): 30-33. |
| DONG Y. The growth of flower import and export reached a new high in 2022: analysis of national flower import and export data[J]. China Flowers & Horticulture, 2023(4): 30-33. | |
| [2] | 温超, 刘美娟, 施敬恬, 等. 菊花侧枝形成与调控研究进展[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2017, 22(12): 45-52. |
| WEN C, LIU M J, SHI J T, et al. Research progress on the formation and regulation of shoot branching in chrysanthemum[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2017, 22(12): 45-52. | |
| [3] | 王江民, 陈发棣, 房伟民, 等. 基于叶形特征的切花菊品种鉴别[J]. 植物学报, 2013, 48(6): 608-615. |
| WANG J M, CHEN F D, FANG W M, et al. Differentiation of cut chrysanthemum cultivars based on multiple foliar morphological parameters[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2013, 48(6): 608-615. | |
| [4] | 郭春晓, 孔德元, 马海燕, 等. 菊花杂交一代叶片形态数量性状分析[J]. 山东林业科技, 2022, 52(3): 1-6. |
| GUO C X, KONG D Y, MA H Y, et al. Analysis of leaf quantitative characters of chrysanthemum hybrid generation[J]. Journal of Shandong Forestry Science and Technology, 2022, 52(3): 1-6. | |
| [5] | 徐旭, 苏江硕, 邓波, 等. 菊花新品种DUS测试指南测试性状的选择[J]. 中国种业, 2024(3): 108-113. |
| XU X, SU J S, DENG B, et al. Selection of test characters in DUS test guideline for new chrysanthemum varieties[J]. China Seed Industry, 2024(3): 108-113. | |
| [6] | 韦立台, 姜新强, 石秀兰. 基于叶部特征的地被菊分类研究[J]. 仲恺农业工程学院学报, 2018, 31(4): 7-14. |
| WEI L T, JIANG X Q, SHI X L. Classification of ground cover chrysanthemum based on leaf's features[J]. Journal of Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, 2018, 31(4): 7-14. | |
| [7] | 沈凤, 蒋逍逍, 房伟民, 等. 切花菊叶片的遗传多样性分析[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2018, 41(2): 275-285. |
| SHEN F, JIANG X X, FANG W M, et al. Genetic diversity analysis of cut chrysanthemum leaves[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2018, 41(2): 275-285. | |
| [8] | 宋雪彬, 高康, 黄河, 等. 中国传统大菊叶片形态的数量化定义与分类[J]. 植物学报, 2021, 56(1): 10-24. |
| SONG X B, GAO K, HUANG H, et al. Quantitative definition and classification of leaves in large-flowered Chinese chrysanthemum based on the morphological traits[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2021, 56(1): 10-24. | |
| [9] | 杨云燕, 温超, 王珂永, 等. 切花菊杂交F1代若干性状的遗传分析[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2015, 20(5): 179-187. |
| YANG Y Y, WEN C, WANG K Y, et al. Heredity analysis of several characters in F1 hybrid generation of cut-flower chrysanthemums[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2015, 20(5): 179-187. | |
| [10] | 国家市场监督管理总局, 国家标准化管理委员会. 植物品种特异性、一致性和稳定性测试指南菊花: GB/T 19557.19—2018[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2018. |
| [11] | 徐晓帆. 切花菊叶、花形态多样性与关联性分析[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2019. |
| XU X F. Morphological diversity and correlation analysis of cut chrysanthemum leaves and flowers[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2019. | |
| [12] | 陈乐, 刘引, 陈昌婕, 等. 药用及茶用菊花种质资源农艺性状的遗传多样性分析[J]. 分子植物育种, 2022, 20(15): 5172-5188. |
| CHEN L, LIU Y, CHEN C J, et al. Analysis on genetic diversity of agronomic traits in chrysanthemum germplasm for medicinal and tea use[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2022, 20(15): 5172-5188. | |
| [13] | 陈晓蕾, 邵伟丽, 厉思源, 等. 6个铁线莲品种杂交F1代表型性状遗传分析[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2023, 40(1): 72-80. |
| CHEN X L, SHAO W L, LI S Y, et al. Genetic analysis of phenotypic traits in F1 hybrids of 6 clematis cultivars[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2023, 40(1): 72-80. | |
| [14] | 姜自红, 卢漫, 叶传跃. 菊花杂交后代总黄酮含量与叶片和花性状分析[J]. 湖南文理学院学报(自然科学版), 2023, 35(2): 53-56. |
| JIANG Z H, LU M, YE C Y. Analysis of flavonoids content and characters of leaves and flowers in hybrid progenies of Chrysanthemum morifolium[J]. Journal of Hunan University of Arts and Science (Science and Technology), 2023, 35(2): 53-56. | |
| [15] | 姜自红, 卢漫. 金丝皇菊与阴歧油菊杂交F1代的部分遗传表现[J]. 文山学院学报, 2020, 33(6): 15-18. |
| JIANG Z H, LU M. Genetic performance of hybrid F1 between Chrysanthemum morifolium ‘Huangju’×C. okiense and the parents[J]. Journal of Wenshan University, 2020, 33(6): 15-18. | |
| [16] | 冯晴云. 切花菊表型性状遗传多样性分析及初选核心种质构建[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2015. |
| FENG Q Y. Genetic diversity analysis of phenotypic traits in cut chrysanthemum and preliminary construction of a core germplasm[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2015. | |
| [17] | 奥妮, 仰小东, 李晨曦, 等. 菊花正反交F1代株高和叶形相关性状的遗传差异[J]. 分子植物育种, 2020, 18(17): 5852-5859. |
| AO N, YANG X D, LI C X, et al. Genetic divergence of plant height and leaf shape related traits in reciprocal F1 progenies of Chrysanthemum[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2020, 18(17): 5852-5859. | |
| [18] | 许兰杰, 梁慧珍, 余永亮, 等. 菊花种质综合评价体系构建及优异种质筛选[J]. 北方园艺, 2022(12): 55-63. |
| XU L J, LIANG H Z, YU Y L, et al. Establishment of comprehensive evaluation of chrysanthemum germplasm and selection of elite resource[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2022(12): 55-63. | |
| [19] | 丁丁, 郑伶杰, 王红宝, 等. 滨海地区不同茶菊品种农艺性状及有效成分综合评价[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(10): 45-53. |
| DING D, ZHENG L J, WANG H B, et al. Agronomic traits and effective components of different tea chrysanthemum varieties in coastal area[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(10): 45-53. | |
| [20] | 裴晓娜, 张秦徽, 张世凯, 等. 核桃楸无性系叶片性状变异分析[J]. 分子植物育种, 2021, 19(6): 2030-2036. |
| PEI X N, ZHANG Q H, ZHANG S K, et al. Variation analysis of leaf characters of Juglans mandshurica clones[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2021, 19(6): 2030-2036. |
| [1] | ZHANG Peng, LIU Shuo, OUYANG Yu, LI Mengmin. Apple leaf disease recognition based on improved EfficientNetV2 model [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(1): 115-124. |
| [2] | FENG Yifu, NI Ming, WANG Zhizhou, CHEN Hong, FANG Hui. Several types of stem and leaf herbicides for the control effect of weeds in wheat fields in southern Zhejiang [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(9): 2230-2234. |
| [3] | LIU Yan, LIN Tianbao, WEI Jia, LIU Peigang, ZHU Yan, LYU Zhiqiang. Comprehensive evaluation of nutritional quality of 12 mulberry leaves in Zhejiang Province [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(9): 2253-2259. |
| [4] | ZHU Pengfei, WU Mingming, ZHAI Rongrong, YE Jing, ZHU Guofu, YU Faming, ZHANG Xiaoming, LI Mengyang, YE Shenghai, WANG Jian. Analysis of major agronomic traits in late japonica rice varieties released in Zhejiang Province over the years [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(7): 1565-1569. |
| [5] | MA Yuan, XU Dongmei, LI Yongkang, SA Chunning, CHANG Yiran, KANG Rulong. Effect of mixed sowing on component allocation and phenotypic traits of Agropyron mongolicum [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(6): 1404-1411. |
| [6] | ZHANG Yuqing, WU Jun, FANG Li, JIN Wenxuan, WANG Hanrong. Pathogen identification, biological characteristics and fungicides screening of leaf spot disease of Saccharum officinarum [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(6): 1429-1432. |
| [7] | LIU Aichun, ZHA Yan, BAI Junhui, HE Xin, LIU Chao. Characterization of quinolone residues in leafy vegetables from growing areas around chicken farms [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(3): 719-723. |
| [8] | GUO Ziqing, ZHOU Qin, LOU Tingting, SHENG Ke, ZHOU Wanguan, XU Cheng, ZHU Siyi, ZHU Pu. Comprehensive evaluation of 11 varieties of fast-growing leafy vegetables in early spring based on the membership function method [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(2): 349-353. |
| [9] | CAO Mengjiao, YAO Zhangliang, WANG Yeqing, YE Liping, YING Chao, CHEN Yiping. Control effect of commonly used pesticides on Chilo suppressalis Walker and leaf roller borer in early rice [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(2): 421-424. |
| [10] | ZENG Wei, GAO Xiteng, DENG Lizhang, HUANG Yechang, YUE Gaohong, PAN Binrong, LIU Yongan. Effects of detasseling time and number of top leaves removed on ear traits of maize cultivar Wenkenuo 1 [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(11): 2552-2555. |
| [11] | JIANG Yuliang, WU Jun, WANG Hanrong. Study on the occurrence symptoms and control techniques of watermelon leaf spot disease [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(11): 2708-2711. |
| [12] | LI Wenqing, YANG Zhengwei, MENG Geng, WANG Yiyi, HOU Juan, WANG Zhihao, SUN Kaile. Preliminary screening of leaf regeneration systems of five cultivated strawberry varieties [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(1): 120-126. |
| [13] | ZHANG Kunchang, LI Yongquan, LYU Yuzhou, WANG Chuan, WU Jinyi, WU Hongfei, CEN Yingyuan, LIAO Boyong, TU Panfeng. Effect of different proportion of foliar fertilizer on the growth and fruit setting of Camellia oleifera [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(1): 62-71. |
| [14] | PANG Minxia, YAO Guoxiang, JIN Bo, QI Yong, XIE Xiongjie. Genetic diversity analysis of 48 accessions of Dendrobium germplasms based on SCoT markers [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(9): 2093-2099. |
| [15] | LIU Jianwei, SHI Guangliang, WEI Jiangwen, LI Jinfeng, HAN Juhong, LI Qingmei, ZHAO Zhihui, JIANG Yanjun. Evaluation of the control efficiency of nanofungicides in the field on apple leaf diseases [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(9): 2160-2164. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||