
Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2026, Vol. 67 ›› Issue (9): 2200-2204.DOI: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20250298
Previous Articles Next Articles
GAO Yuanyuan(
), TAN He, LI Siqi, ZHU Chunyu, HE Junya, LIU Guowei, REN Yanyun(
)
Received:2025-04-26
Online:2026-09-11
Published:2026-09-24
Contact:
REN Yanyun
CLC Number:
GAO Yuanyuan, TAN He, LI Siqi, ZHU Chunyu, HE Junya, LIU Guowei, REN Yanyun. Effects of 10 kinds of microbial inoculants on the growth,development and yield of garlic[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(9): 2200-2204.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnykx.cn/EN/10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20250298
| 处理 | 株高/cm | 假茎高/cm | 株幅/cm | 叶长/cm | 叶宽/cm | 假茎粗/cm | 叶片数 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 62.77±0.47 abc | 30.50±0.95 abc | 52.37±3.73 a | 59.70±0.74 abc | 3.73±0.09 ab | 2.10±0.06 abc | 13.00±0 a |
| 解淀粉芽孢杆菌 | 58.73±2.46 abc | 34.70±0.46 a | 55.33±6.04 a | 63.63±1.79 a | 4.10±0.10 a | 2.40±0.15 ab | 14.67±0.88 a |
| 哈茨木霉菌 | 63.57±3.20 abc | 33.53±1.57 ab | 51.13±4.21 a | 61.56±0.69 ab | 4.03±0.22 a | 2.43±0.15 a | 14.67±1.20 a |
| 枯草芽孢杆菌 | 65.57±4.59 ab | 31.10±1.90 abc | 55.33±3.17 a | 59.53±2.26 abc | 3.73±0.09 ab | 2.13±0.07 abc | 14.33±0.33 a |
| 50%申嗪霉素 | 64.17±6.92 abc | 30.17±2.54 abc | 57.47±2.54 a | 58.57±2.69 abc | 3.80±0.15 ab | 2.07±0.07 bc | 13.33±0.33 a |
| 多抗霉素 | 69.10±4.90 a | 31.80±0.74 abc | 52.67±2.84 a | 59.64±2.15 abc | 3.77±0.23 ab | 2.13±0.19 abc | 15.00±0.58 a |
| 春雷霉素 | 52.80±4.87 c | 27.90±2.50 c | 32.37±1.62 b | 57.50±1.86 bc | 3.13±0.09 c | 1.83±0.09 c | 13.33±0.33 a |
| 荧光假单胞杆菌 | 55.54±0.90 bc | 30.87±2.03 abc | 50.70±3.83 a | 56.50±1.35 bc | 3.43±0.03 bc | 1.87±0.07 c | 14.00±0.58 a |
| 井冈霉素 | 64.50±0.67 abc | 34.13±1.16 ab | 53.23±1.29 a | 63.87±0.73 a | 4.13±0.09 a | 2.17±0.03 abc | 14.00±0 a |
| 中生菌素 | 58.97±3.42 abc | 29.74±1.58 abc | 47.90±2.29 a | 63.67±2.32 a | 3.97±0.12 a | 2.07±0.09 bc | 13.67±0.33 a |
| 香菇多糖 | 55.47±2.64 bc | 29.30±0.49 bc | 51.43±3.89 a | 55.70±1.19 c | 3.30±0.21 bc | 1.87±0.07 c | 13.67±0.88 a |
Table 1 Effects of different microbial agents on the growth and development of garlic plants
| 处理 | 株高/cm | 假茎高/cm | 株幅/cm | 叶长/cm | 叶宽/cm | 假茎粗/cm | 叶片数 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 62.77±0.47 abc | 30.50±0.95 abc | 52.37±3.73 a | 59.70±0.74 abc | 3.73±0.09 ab | 2.10±0.06 abc | 13.00±0 a |
| 解淀粉芽孢杆菌 | 58.73±2.46 abc | 34.70±0.46 a | 55.33±6.04 a | 63.63±1.79 a | 4.10±0.10 a | 2.40±0.15 ab | 14.67±0.88 a |
| 哈茨木霉菌 | 63.57±3.20 abc | 33.53±1.57 ab | 51.13±4.21 a | 61.56±0.69 ab | 4.03±0.22 a | 2.43±0.15 a | 14.67±1.20 a |
| 枯草芽孢杆菌 | 65.57±4.59 ab | 31.10±1.90 abc | 55.33±3.17 a | 59.53±2.26 abc | 3.73±0.09 ab | 2.13±0.07 abc | 14.33±0.33 a |
| 50%申嗪霉素 | 64.17±6.92 abc | 30.17±2.54 abc | 57.47±2.54 a | 58.57±2.69 abc | 3.80±0.15 ab | 2.07±0.07 bc | 13.33±0.33 a |
| 多抗霉素 | 69.10±4.90 a | 31.80±0.74 abc | 52.67±2.84 a | 59.64±2.15 abc | 3.77±0.23 ab | 2.13±0.19 abc | 15.00±0.58 a |
| 春雷霉素 | 52.80±4.87 c | 27.90±2.50 c | 32.37±1.62 b | 57.50±1.86 bc | 3.13±0.09 c | 1.83±0.09 c | 13.33±0.33 a |
| 荧光假单胞杆菌 | 55.54±0.90 bc | 30.87±2.03 abc | 50.70±3.83 a | 56.50±1.35 bc | 3.43±0.03 bc | 1.87±0.07 c | 14.00±0.58 a |
| 井冈霉素 | 64.50±0.67 abc | 34.13±1.16 ab | 53.23±1.29 a | 63.87±0.73 a | 4.13±0.09 a | 2.17±0.03 abc | 14.00±0 a |
| 中生菌素 | 58.97±3.42 abc | 29.74±1.58 abc | 47.90±2.29 a | 63.67±2.32 a | 3.97±0.12 a | 2.07±0.09 bc | 13.67±0.33 a |
| 香菇多糖 | 55.47±2.64 bc | 29.30±0.49 bc | 51.43±3.89 a | 55.70±1.19 c | 3.30±0.21 bc | 1.87±0.07 c | 13.67±0.88 a |
| 处理 | 单薹重/g | 薹茎长/cm | 花苞长/cm | 花苞宽/cm | 薹茎基部粗/cm | 薹茎中部粗/cm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 13.18±0.59 cd | 59.90±3.45 cd | 19.42±0.50 a | 0.80±0.02 a | 0.69±0.01 ab | 0.56±0 ab |
| 解淀粉芽孢杆菌 | 16.22±1.65 abc | 67.90±2.84 abc | 20.50±0.67 a | 0.86±0.04 a | 0.65±0.02 ab | 0.52±0.01 bc |
| 哈茨木霉菌 | 19.32±1.16 a | 70.68±2.62 a | 19.80±0.55 a | 0.94±0.03 a | 0.70±0.02 a | 0.58±0.01 a |
| 枯草芽孢杆菌 | 13.50±0.75 bcd | 61.08±2.14 bcd | 20.40±0.26 a | 0.83±0.03 a | 0.69±0.01 ab | 0.51±0.01 bc |
| 50%申嗪霉素 | 17.18±1.84 ab | 68.08±2.47 abc | 19.84±0.56 a | 0.83±0.05 a | 0.71±0.04 a | 0.56±0.02 ab |
| 多抗霉素 | 14.48±1.35 bcd | 63.48±2.37 abcd | 19.62±0.83 a | 0.87±0.03 a | 0.72±0.03 a | 0.51±0.02 bc |
| 春雷霉素 | 15.50±1.18 bc | 63.88±2.19 abcd | 19.22±0.88 a | 0.89±0.05 a | 0.73±0.02 a | 0.56±0.02 ab |
| 荧光假单胞杆菌 | 14.94±0.57 bcd | 65.78±0.93 abc | 20.02±1.62 a | 0.92±0.12 a | 0.71±0.01 a | 0.54±0.02 abc |
| 井冈霉素 | 15.94±1.26 abc | 69.06±2.69 ab | 19.60±0.59 a | 0.91±0.01 a | 0.69±0.04 ab | 0.51±0.02 bc |
| 中生菌素 | 16.54±0.72 abc | 63.94±1.92 abcd | 18.62±0.36 a | 0.93±0.02 a | 0.73±0.02 a | 0.55±0.02 abc |
| 香菇多糖 | 11.58±1.04 d | 57.14±3.01 d | 19.68±0.47 a | 0.82±0.03 a | 0.62±0.03 b | 0.49±0.02 c |
Table 2 Effects of different microbial agents on the growth and development of garlic sprouts
| 处理 | 单薹重/g | 薹茎长/cm | 花苞长/cm | 花苞宽/cm | 薹茎基部粗/cm | 薹茎中部粗/cm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 13.18±0.59 cd | 59.90±3.45 cd | 19.42±0.50 a | 0.80±0.02 a | 0.69±0.01 ab | 0.56±0 ab |
| 解淀粉芽孢杆菌 | 16.22±1.65 abc | 67.90±2.84 abc | 20.50±0.67 a | 0.86±0.04 a | 0.65±0.02 ab | 0.52±0.01 bc |
| 哈茨木霉菌 | 19.32±1.16 a | 70.68±2.62 a | 19.80±0.55 a | 0.94±0.03 a | 0.70±0.02 a | 0.58±0.01 a |
| 枯草芽孢杆菌 | 13.50±0.75 bcd | 61.08±2.14 bcd | 20.40±0.26 a | 0.83±0.03 a | 0.69±0.01 ab | 0.51±0.01 bc |
| 50%申嗪霉素 | 17.18±1.84 ab | 68.08±2.47 abc | 19.84±0.56 a | 0.83±0.05 a | 0.71±0.04 a | 0.56±0.02 ab |
| 多抗霉素 | 14.48±1.35 bcd | 63.48±2.37 abcd | 19.62±0.83 a | 0.87±0.03 a | 0.72±0.03 a | 0.51±0.02 bc |
| 春雷霉素 | 15.50±1.18 bc | 63.88±2.19 abcd | 19.22±0.88 a | 0.89±0.05 a | 0.73±0.02 a | 0.56±0.02 ab |
| 荧光假单胞杆菌 | 14.94±0.57 bcd | 65.78±0.93 abc | 20.02±1.62 a | 0.92±0.12 a | 0.71±0.01 a | 0.54±0.02 abc |
| 井冈霉素 | 15.94±1.26 abc | 69.06±2.69 ab | 19.60±0.59 a | 0.91±0.01 a | 0.69±0.04 ab | 0.51±0.02 bc |
| 中生菌素 | 16.54±0.72 abc | 63.94±1.92 abcd | 18.62±0.36 a | 0.93±0.02 a | 0.73±0.02 a | 0.55±0.02 abc |
| 香菇多糖 | 11.58±1.04 d | 57.14±3.01 d | 19.68±0.47 a | 0.82±0.03 a | 0.62±0.03 b | 0.49±0.02 c |
| 处理 | 鳞茎高/cm | 鳞茎横径/cm | 单头鳞茎重/g | 鳞芽高/cm | 鳞芽背宽/cm | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 3.36±0.06 d | 5.68±0.04 bc | 54.76±1.03 bcd | 3.08±0.06 bc | 1.64±0.07 a | ||
| 解淀粉芽孢杆菌 | 3.62±0.13 abc | 5.87±0.06 ab | 61.33±3.01 a | 3.02±0.07 bc | 1.69±0.03 a | ||
| 哈茨木霉菌 | 3.70±0.04 a | 5.90±0.05 a | 59.13±1.10 ab | 3.09±0.05 bc | 1.77±0.06 a | ||
| 枯草芽孢杆菌 | 3.54±0.01 abcd | 5.90±0.14 a | 60.18±2.10 ab | 2.93±0.05 c | 1.80±0.03 a | ||
| 50%申嗪霉素 | 3.61±0.08 abc | 5.85±0.06 ab | 59.47±1.81 ab | 3.19±0.02 ab | 1.62±0.07 a | ||
| 多抗霉素 | 3.41±0.05 cd | 5.87±0.09 ab | 58.93±1.33 abc | 3.12±0.03 ab | 1.65±0.06 a | ||
| 春雷霉素 | 3.51±0.07 abcd | 5.53±0.04 c | 52.15±1.83 d | 3.27±0.12 a | 1.63±0.09 a | ||
| 荧光假单胞杆菌 | 3.43±0.08 bcd | 5.70±0.01 ab | 54.87±2.25 bcd | 3.05±0.04 bc | 1.55±0.06 a | ||
| 井冈霉素 | 3.64±0.07 ab | 5.74±0.04 ab | 59.96±1.25 ab | 3.19±0.02 ab | 1.67±0.07 a | ||
| 中生菌素 | 3.47±0.09 bcd | 5.87±0.04 ab | 62.54±1.41 a | 3.09±0.04 bc | 1.71±0.09 a | ||
| 香菇多糖 | 3.38±0.05 d | 5.68±0.07 bc | 53.67±1.61 cd | 3.07±0.03 bc | 1.68±0.08 a | ||
| 处理 | 鳞芽数 | 鳞茎盘厚/cm | 鳞茎盘直径/cm | 每667 m2产量/kg | |||
| CK | 14.8±0.6 ab | 0.54±0.02 bc | 2.64±0.13 b | 1 367.54±6.43 d | |||
| 解淀粉芽孢杆菌 | 14.8±0.4 ab | 0.54±0.02 bc | 2.63±0.08 b | 14 24.26±6.61 c | |||
| 哈茨木霉菌 | 14.6±0.7 ab | 0.57±0.03 bc | 2.73±0.09 b | 1 446.83±6.31 b | |||
| 枯草芽孢杆菌 | 13.2±0.7 b | 0.51±0.02 c | 2.69±0.11 b | 1 456.13±6.82 b | |||
| 50%申嗪霉素 | 14.2±0.4 ab | 0.58±0.01 abc | 2.77±0.07 b | 1 466.69±8.38 b | |||
| 多抗霉素 | 15.8±0.6 a | 0.55±0.02 bc | 2.71±0.07 b | 1 414.98±6.02 c | |||
| 春雷霉素 | 13.8±0.3 b | 0.61±0.01 ab | 2.91±0.08 b | 1 343.23±5.68 d | |||
| 荧光假单胞杆菌 | 14.6±0.4 ab | 0.53±0.03 bc | 2.82±0.11 b | 1 347.17±5.58 d | |||
| 井冈霉素 | 14.8±0.8 ab | 0.66±0.04 a | 2.69±0.06 b | 1 503.56±9.20 a | |||
| 中生菌素 | 16.0±0.3 a | 0.58±0.03 abc | 3.74±0.77 a | 1 500.02±9.21 a | |||
| 香菇多糖 | 14.6±0.5 ab | 0.52±0.05 bc | 2.59±0.16 b | 1 342.77±4.58 d | |||
Table 3 Effects of different microbial agents on garlic bulb and yield
| 处理 | 鳞茎高/cm | 鳞茎横径/cm | 单头鳞茎重/g | 鳞芽高/cm | 鳞芽背宽/cm | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 3.36±0.06 d | 5.68±0.04 bc | 54.76±1.03 bcd | 3.08±0.06 bc | 1.64±0.07 a | ||
| 解淀粉芽孢杆菌 | 3.62±0.13 abc | 5.87±0.06 ab | 61.33±3.01 a | 3.02±0.07 bc | 1.69±0.03 a | ||
| 哈茨木霉菌 | 3.70±0.04 a | 5.90±0.05 a | 59.13±1.10 ab | 3.09±0.05 bc | 1.77±0.06 a | ||
| 枯草芽孢杆菌 | 3.54±0.01 abcd | 5.90±0.14 a | 60.18±2.10 ab | 2.93±0.05 c | 1.80±0.03 a | ||
| 50%申嗪霉素 | 3.61±0.08 abc | 5.85±0.06 ab | 59.47±1.81 ab | 3.19±0.02 ab | 1.62±0.07 a | ||
| 多抗霉素 | 3.41±0.05 cd | 5.87±0.09 ab | 58.93±1.33 abc | 3.12±0.03 ab | 1.65±0.06 a | ||
| 春雷霉素 | 3.51±0.07 abcd | 5.53±0.04 c | 52.15±1.83 d | 3.27±0.12 a | 1.63±0.09 a | ||
| 荧光假单胞杆菌 | 3.43±0.08 bcd | 5.70±0.01 ab | 54.87±2.25 bcd | 3.05±0.04 bc | 1.55±0.06 a | ||
| 井冈霉素 | 3.64±0.07 ab | 5.74±0.04 ab | 59.96±1.25 ab | 3.19±0.02 ab | 1.67±0.07 a | ||
| 中生菌素 | 3.47±0.09 bcd | 5.87±0.04 ab | 62.54±1.41 a | 3.09±0.04 bc | 1.71±0.09 a | ||
| 香菇多糖 | 3.38±0.05 d | 5.68±0.07 bc | 53.67±1.61 cd | 3.07±0.03 bc | 1.68±0.08 a | ||
| 处理 | 鳞芽数 | 鳞茎盘厚/cm | 鳞茎盘直径/cm | 每667 m2产量/kg | |||
| CK | 14.8±0.6 ab | 0.54±0.02 bc | 2.64±0.13 b | 1 367.54±6.43 d | |||
| 解淀粉芽孢杆菌 | 14.8±0.4 ab | 0.54±0.02 bc | 2.63±0.08 b | 14 24.26±6.61 c | |||
| 哈茨木霉菌 | 14.6±0.7 ab | 0.57±0.03 bc | 2.73±0.09 b | 1 446.83±6.31 b | |||
| 枯草芽孢杆菌 | 13.2±0.7 b | 0.51±0.02 c | 2.69±0.11 b | 1 456.13±6.82 b | |||
| 50%申嗪霉素 | 14.2±0.4 ab | 0.58±0.01 abc | 2.77±0.07 b | 1 466.69±8.38 b | |||
| 多抗霉素 | 15.8±0.6 a | 0.55±0.02 bc | 2.71±0.07 b | 1 414.98±6.02 c | |||
| 春雷霉素 | 13.8±0.3 b | 0.61±0.01 ab | 2.91±0.08 b | 1 343.23±5.68 d | |||
| 荧光假单胞杆菌 | 14.6±0.4 ab | 0.53±0.03 bc | 2.82±0.11 b | 1 347.17±5.58 d | |||
| 井冈霉素 | 14.8±0.8 ab | 0.66±0.04 a | 2.69±0.06 b | 1 503.56±9.20 a | |||
| 中生菌素 | 16.0±0.3 a | 0.58±0.03 abc | 3.74±0.77 a | 1 500.02±9.21 a | |||
| 香菇多糖 | 14.6±0.5 ab | 0.52±0.05 bc | 2.59±0.16 b | 1 342.77±4.58 d | |||
| [1] | 葛洁,杨峰,陆信娟,等. 温度对大蒜花形态建成和花粉活力的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报,2024,40(7):1297-1304. |
| [2] | 张国莉,周倩怡,余小奎,等. 基于转录组的大蒜水通道蛋白基因家族的鉴定与分析[J]. 分子植物育种,2024,24(22):8034-8047. |
| [3] | 莫亚明. 大蒜叶枯病的发生症状及综合防治技术[J]. 上海蔬菜,2024(5):35-36. |
| [4] | 高园园,刘国伟,张成刚,等. 鳞芽朝向播种方式对大蒜主要农艺性状的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学,2020,61(5):945-946. |
| [5] | 石朝鹏,尹姗姗,王丹,等. 山东大蒜迟眼蕈蚊的发生与绿色防控技术[J]. 中国蔬菜,2021(4):117-119. |
| [6] | 刘欣玲,张新玉,马倩. 大蒜根腐病的发生规律与综合防治技术[J].吉林蔬菜,2013(5):37. |
| [7] | 张睿哲,史伟,高晓静. 植物微生态制剂在大蒜上的应用[J]. 中国微生态学杂志,2022,34(7):781-783. |
| [8] | 郑子桢,李秀娟,周伟,等. 微生物菌剂在药用植物病害防治中的应用进展[J]. 浙江农业科学,2024,65(5):1236-1241. |
| [9] | 关耀兵,张倩男,王克雄,等. 不同微生物菌剂对连作地芹菜生长、产量及经济效益影响的综合评价[J]. 宁夏农林科技,2023,64(12):9-14. |
| [10] | 祝虹钰,刘闯,李蓬勃,等. 微生物菌剂的应用及其研究进展[J]. 湖北农业科学,2017,56(5):805-808. |
| [11] | 王俊铎,龚照龙,梁亚军,等. 3种微生物菌剂对源棉8号生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 中国棉花,2024(2):4-9. |
| [12] | 朱明,张越,张明科. 5种菌剂处理对黄瓜生长及果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学,2024,65(3):680-684. |
| [13] | 孔祥馨,王丽娟. 不同微生物菌剂对草莓植株生长及种苗繁育的影响[J]. 果树资源学报,2025,6(1):33-37. |
| [14] | 刘爱华,徐保民,陈燕. 不同配方施肥及微生物菌肥对大蒜重茬病防治效果[J]. 山东农业科学,2009,41(6):91-92. |
| [15] | 贺维昭,温国昌,张连成,等. 秸秆还田和微生物菌剂对大蒜产量及肥料利用率的影响[J]. 陕西农业科学,2024,70(9):15-19. |
| [16] | 王立辉,何志学,李静,等. 生物有机肥配施微生物菌剂对蒜苗生长、生理、产量及品质的影响[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报,2023,58(5):63-70. |
| [17] | 邵秀丽,王吉庆,张慎璞,等. 微生物菌剂与尿素配施对大蒜氮吸收及产量的影响[J]. 北方园艺,2013(16):199-202. |
| [18] | 夏渝静,卢树,张迎珂. 微生物菌剂施用对设施萝卜产量、品质与土壤性状影响研究[J]. 天津农学院学报,2024,31(4):1-7. |
| [19] | 周欣,耿银民,邙光伟,等. 微生物菌剂替代部分化肥对冀北春大豆农艺性状及产量和品质的影响[J]. 河北农业科学,2024,28(5):57-61. |
| [20] | 李青璞,白建海,姚拓,等. 微生物菌剂与氮肥配施对紫花苜蓿生长及土壤性质的影响[J]. 草地学报,2024,32(1):314-321. |
| [21] | 罗林毅,陈瑞杰,阮向阳,等. 微生物菌剂对滴灌棉田土壤养分和棉花产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学,2024(1):26-33. |
| [22] | 陈芳,李字辉,王兵跃,等. 微生物菌剂对冬小麦生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学,2024,61(8):1853-1860. |
| [23] | 李百云,许泽华,郭鑫年,等. 不同微生物菌剂对土壤肥力及苹果果实品质的影响[J]. 果树资源学报,2024,5(6):55-60. |
| [1] | CHEN Jun, XU Qiangqiang, YU Pengcheng, DING Yangdong, BAO Zuda. High-efficiency cultivation techniques for early rice variety Zhongzu 18 in the coastal region of Taizhou [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(9): 2109-2112. |
| [2] | LUO Chunhong, SHI Yong, LYU Zhiwei, JIN Meijuan, ZHANG Yanhui, WANG Haihou. Effect of “one-basal-one-topdressing” fertilization mode on rice yield and nutrient uptake and utilization [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(9): 2119-2123. |
| [3] | WANG Wu, WANG Jingjing, ZHANG Peng, ZHANG Yanbing, WANG Kangkang, MAO Xiaoye. Screening test of herbicide-resistant rice varieties in Huaibei region of Jiangsu Province in 2024 [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(9): 2124-2127. |
| [4] | ZHANG Liangcheng, XU Jun, HUAI Yan, MENG Zhonglei, ZHANG Yao, WANG Junmei, YUE Wenhao, LIU Lei, LI Yong, CAI Kangfeng. Integration and application of high-yield and high-efficiency cultivation technique for feed barley [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(9): 2140-2142. |
| [5] | ZHU Zhizhong, GE Zixuan, DUAN Weidong, WANG Xinzhong, GUO Fangyang, WU Zhaohui, XU Wenzheng. Effects of organic fertilizer formulations on oil content,yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco leaves [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(9): 2143-2148. |
| [6] | YE Xiongfang, CHEN Ke, HE Dongping, RONG Song, XIANG Tao, GU Likai, YU Yongqi, FAN Anli, YANG Zhe, ZHANG Yulong, WANG Huaying. Comparative study of six taste-oriented tomato varieties under greenhouse substrate cultivation [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(9): 2172-2176. |
| [7] | MA Chuangju, WANG Dengliang, SUN Jiancheng, CHEN Jun, XU Yanhui, TONG Lu, LIU Lili. Effects of spraying plant growth regulator and foliar fertilizer on the fruit cracking and quality of hybrid citrus Yangguang 1 [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(9): 2177-2182. |
| [8] | WANG Lili, ZHU Shijun. Effects of Trichoderma microbial agent on grape quality,yield and soil microorganisms [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(9): 2193-2195. |
| [9] | GUO Lianjun, WANG Yajing, LI Teng, CUI Kai, DONG Zhan. Identification and pathogenicity of pathogens of garlic(Allium sativum L.) root rot [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(9): 2235-2239. |
| [10] | HE Jie, ZHANG Juefeng, LI Fang, YU Kaili, LI Linhan, WANG Jia, ZHONG Haiying. Effects of different fertilizer treatments on Pomacea canaliculata and Oryza sativa [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(9): 2250-2254. |
| [11] | ZHANG Kun, ZHONG Qunbin, WU Hao, LI Jun, SHEN Yutian, WANG Yongxia. Effects of selenomethionine on the growth performance,immune function and serum biochemical indicators of yellow-feathered broilers induced by high fluoride exposure [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(9): 2279-2284. |
| [12] | CAI Meiyan, MAO Lingrong, LIN Guiping, LIN Yi, XIAO Wenduo. Effects of different biodegradable mulching films on growth,yield and soil environment of taro [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(9): 2294-2297. |
| [13] | XU Haimin, YU Pengcheng, SHI Tongwu, XU Qiangqiang, CHEN Wei, YE Zhengqian. Effect of different amounts of meal residue organic fertilizer on the growth of cabbage and soil improvement [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(9): 2298-2303. |
| [14] | CHEN Jinfei, LI Pengquan, LIU Weicheng, DING Wenyong, JI Dewei, CHEN Chen. Effects of fermented feed as a replacement for trash fish on growth performance,digestive enzyme activity,and flesh quality of Bostrychus sinensis [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(8): 1848-1854. |
| [15] | WANG Li, SONG Lingen, CHEN Zhe, JIANG Luxin, SHI Like, YE Jian, FAN Peng, LI Tingyi, TANG Jinyu. Comparison of growth performance and muscle nutritional components between Taihu No. 3 and native stock of Macrobrachium nipponense under rice-prawn rotation system [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(8): 1882-1887. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||