不同育苗基质对草莓粉玉2号扦插苗生长的影响

doi:10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20250341

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本研究旨在明确不同育苗基质对草莓扦插苗的应用效果，为草炭和椰糠在草莓扦插苗中的精准混合施用提供理论依据。以粉玉2号品种作为研究对象，测定不同配比基质的理化性质和草莓扦插苗的生长指标，分析不同基质对草莓扦插苗生长的影响。结果表明，在各类基质配比中，由椰糠、珍珠岩、蛭石按质量比4∶1∶1配制而成的基质，其总孔隙度和持水孔隙度相较于草炭、珍珠岩、蛭石质量比4∶1∶1配制的基质表现更优。采用椰糠、珍珠岩、蛭石质量比4∶1∶1配制的基质，草莓的地下部鲜重、地上部干重、地下部干重以及全株干重均优于其他处理。与此同时，该基质处理的草莓扦插苗叶片气孔导度、胞间CO?浓度和蒸腾速率也处于较高水平。

关键词: 草莓, 扦插苗, 基质, 生物量, 光合作用

Abstract:

This research aimed to elucidate the application effects of different substrates on strawberry cutting seedlings，thereby providing a theoretical foundation for the precise mixed application of peat and coir on strawberry cutting seedlings. Using the strawberry cultivar Fenyu 2 as the research material，the physicochemical properties of substrates with different ratios and the growth indicators of strawberry cutting seedlings were determined. The effects of different substrates on seedling growth were analyzed. The results indicated that the substrate composed of coir，perlite，and vermiculite at a mass ratio of 4∶1∶1 demonstrated higher total porosity and water-holding porosity compared with the substrate composed of peat，perlite，and vermiculite at the same mass ratio. Strawberry seedlings grown in the substrate composed of coir，perlite，and vermiculite at a mass ratio of 4∶1∶1 exhibited superior underground fresh weight，above-ground dry weight，underground dry weight，and whole-plant dry weight compared with other treatments. Meanwhile，strawberry cutting seedlings in this substrate treatment maintained relatively high levels of leaf stomatal conductance，intercellular CO? concentration，and transpiration rate.

Key words: strawberry, cutting seedling, substrate, biomass, photosynthesis

中图分类号:

S668.4

来文国, 李晓媛, 柳爱春, 汪建荣, 肖文斐, 余红, 查燕. 不同育苗基质对草莓粉玉2号扦插苗生长的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2026, 67(7): 1710-1713.

LAI Wenguo, LI Xiaoyuan, LIU Aichun, WANG Jianrong, XIAO Wenfei, YU Hong, ZHA Yan. Effects of different substrates on growth of cutting seedlings of strawberry Fenyu 2[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2026, 67(7): 1710-1713.

图/表 5

参考文献 9

[1]	Gruda N， Bisbis M， Tanny J. Impacts of protected vegetable cultivation on climate change and adaptation strategies for cleaner production：a review［J］. Journal of Cleaner Production，2019，225：324-339.
[2]	Barrett G E， Alexander P D， Robinson J S，et al. Achieving environmentally sustainable growing media for soilless plant cultivation systems：a review［J］. Scientia Horticulturae，2016，212：220-234.
[3]	Zhang P， Wei T， Jia Z，et al. Effects of different substrate compositions on growth and water use efficiency of tomato seedlings［J］. Agronomy，2020，10（5）：634.
[4]	Savvas D， Gruda N. Application of soilless culture technologies in the modern greenhouse industry：a review［J］. European Journal of Horticultural Science，2018，83（5）：280-293.
[5]	朱丽，殷敏，任荣荣，等. 3种微生物菌剂对基质栽培草莓生长发育、果实产量品质和病害的影响［J］. 江苏农业科学，2023，51（1）：155-160.
[6]	高婷，沙毓沧，陆琳，等. 不同基质配比对白菜幼苗生长的影响［J］. 北方园艺，2021（7）：33-37.
[7]	王娟，陈立新，刘力勇，等. 不同复合基质理化性质对草莓产量的影响及其主成分分析［J］. 北方园艺，2018（20）：52-57.
[8]	汤柔颖，邱志豪，韩莹琰，等. 不同椰糠混配基质对生菜生长的影响［J］. 安徽农业科学，2019，47（21）：45-47.
[9]	刘景霞. 不同温度、光照和基质对辣椒幼苗生长的影响［D］.长沙：湖南农业大学，2010.

处理	容重/（g·cm^-3）	总孔隙度/%	持水孔隙度/%	通气孔隙度/%	pH值	EC/（mS·cm^-1）
T1	0.155±0.03 a	59.64±1.32 d	32.96±3.47 b	24.15±1.16 a	6.57±0.01 a	0.14±0.02 a
T2	0.162±0.04 a	63.95±1.45 c	36.71±2.18 b	28.62±1.75 a	6.67±0.01 a	0.15±0.06 a
T3	0.158±0.05 a	76.36±2.37 b	56.42±1.64 a	16.95±2.19 b	6.52±0.01 a	0.12±0.04 a
T4	0.164±0.06 a	83.38±2.68 a	59.65±3.75 a	23.88±2.26 a	6.59±0.01 a	0.13±0.07 a

处理	容重/（g·cm^-3）	总孔隙度/%	持水孔隙度/%	通气孔隙度/%	pH值	EC/（mS·cm^-1）
T1	0.155±0.03 a	59.64±1.32 d	32.96±3.47 b	24.15±1.16 a	6.57±0.01 a	0.14±0.02 a
T2	0.162±0.04 a	63.95±1.45 c	36.71±2.18 b	28.62±1.75 a	6.67±0.01 a	0.15±0.06 a
T3	0.158±0.05 a	76.36±2.37 b	56.42±1.64 a	16.95±2.19 b	6.52±0.01 a	0.12±0.04 a
T4	0.164±0.06 a	83.38±2.68 a	59.65±3.75 a	23.88±2.26 a	6.59±0.01 a	0.13±0.07 a

处理	成活率/%	叶柄粗/cm	叶柄长/cm	叶长/cm	叶宽/cm
T1	97.64±4.25 a	3.56±0.32 a	8.46±1.52 b	11.85±1.07 b	8.48±0.94 b
T2	98.06±5.13 a	3.51±0.41 a	11.96±1.75 a	11.54±0.96 b	8.37±0.92 b
T3	97.26±6.92 a	3.28±0.23 a	12.05±1.87 a	12.85±1.34 a	9.13±0.87 a
T4	97.11±4.46 a	3.54±0.63 a	12.17±1.19 a	13.43±1.53 a	9.25±0.85 a

处理	成活率/%	叶柄粗/cm	叶柄长/cm	叶长/cm	叶宽/cm
T1	97.64±4.25 a	3.56±0.32 a	8.46±1.52 b	11.85±1.07 b	8.48±0.94 b
T2	98.06±5.13 a	3.51±0.41 a	11.96±1.75 a	11.54±0.96 b	8.37±0.92 b
T3	97.26±6.92 a	3.28±0.23 a	12.05±1.87 a	12.85±1.34 a	9.13±0.87 a
T4	97.11±4.46 a	3.54±0.63 a	12.17±1.19 a	13.43±1.53 a	9.25±0.85 a

处理	地上部鲜重	地下部鲜重	全株鲜重	地上部干重	地下部干重	全株干重
T1	6.84±0.85 a	4.86±0.47 b	11.65±0.98 b	1.32±0.25 b	0.49±0.06 b	1.79±0.18 b
T2	6.92±0.92 a	5.39±0.51 b	12.37±1.04 a	1.38±0.37 b	0.42±0.04 b	1.81±0.21 b
T3	5.37±0.67 a	4.97±0.43 b	10.32±1.05 b	1.04±0.41 c	0.53±0.07 b	1.58±0.16 c
T4	5.95±0.59 a	7.49±0.59 a	13.47±0.94 a	1.52±0.23 a	0.79±0.11 a	2.43±0.22 a