
Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2025, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (10): 2340-2346.DOI: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20240821
Previous Articles Next Articles
LI Xia(
), CHENG Zhimin, YANG Ping, CAI Yi, LI Youhui, HUANG Sheng, TANG Ming
Received:2024-10-25
Online:2025-10-11
Published:2025-10-21
CLC Number:
LI Xia, CHENG Zhimin, YANG Ping, CAI Yi, LI Youhui, HUANG Sheng, TANG Ming. Effect of different intercropping patterns of maize and peanut on system yield[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(10): 2340-2346.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnykx.cn/EN/10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20240821
| 处理 | 667 m2种植密度/株 | 行距/cm | 株距/cm | 玉米-花生间距/ cm | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 玉米 | 花生 | 玉米 | 花生 | 玉米 | 花生 | ||
| SM | 3 144 | — | 80.0 | — | 53.0 | — | 60.0 |
| SP | — | 8 888 | — | 30.0 | — | 25.0 | 60.0 |
| M2P4 | 3 134 | 5 333 | 55.0 | 25.0 | 34.0 | 20.0 | 60.0 |
| M2P6 | 3 118 | 6 667 | 55.0 | 25.0 | 28.5 | 20.0 | 60.0 |
| M3P4 | 3 123 | 4 372 | 55.0 | 25.0 | 42.0 | 20.0 | 60.0 |
| M3P8 | 3 115 | 6 583 | 55.0 | 25.0 | 31.7 | 20.0 | 60.0 |
Table 1 Maize-peanut field planting density, row spacing, and plant spacing
| 处理 | 667 m2种植密度/株 | 行距/cm | 株距/cm | 玉米-花生间距/ cm | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 玉米 | 花生 | 玉米 | 花生 | 玉米 | 花生 | ||
| SM | 3 144 | — | 80.0 | — | 53.0 | — | 60.0 |
| SP | — | 8 888 | — | 30.0 | — | 25.0 | 60.0 |
| M2P4 | 3 134 | 5 333 | 55.0 | 25.0 | 34.0 | 20.0 | 60.0 |
| M2P6 | 3 118 | 6 667 | 55.0 | 25.0 | 28.5 | 20.0 | 60.0 |
| M3P4 | 3 123 | 4 372 | 55.0 | 25.0 | 42.0 | 20.0 | 60.0 |
| M3P8 | 3 115 | 6 583 | 55.0 | 25.0 | 31.7 | 20.0 | 60.0 |
| 处理 | 播种期 (月-日) | 出苗期 (月-日) | 拔节期 (月-日) | 大喇叭口期 (月-日) | 吐丝期 (月-日) | 灌浆期 (月-日) | 成熟期 (月-日) | 生育期/ d | 出苗率/ % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM | 03-19 | 03-29 | 04-21 | 05-16 | 05-26 | 06-04 | 07-13 | 116 a | 98 a |
| M2P4 | 03-19 | 03-29 | 04-21 | 05-17 | 05-26 | 06-04 | 07-13 | 116 a | 97 ab |
| M2P6 | 03-19 | 03-29 | 04-22 | 05-17 | 05-26 | 06-05 | 07-14 | 117 a | 97 ab |
| M3P4 | 03-19 | 03-29 | 04-21 | 05-17 | 05-26 | 06-04 | 07-13 | 116 a | 96 b |
| M3P8 | 03-19 | 03-29 | 04-22 | 05-16 | 05-26 | 06-05 | 07-14 | 117 a | 98 a |
Table 2 Effects of different intercropping row ratios on maize growth stages
| 处理 | 播种期 (月-日) | 出苗期 (月-日) | 拔节期 (月-日) | 大喇叭口期 (月-日) | 吐丝期 (月-日) | 灌浆期 (月-日) | 成熟期 (月-日) | 生育期/ d | 出苗率/ % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM | 03-19 | 03-29 | 04-21 | 05-16 | 05-26 | 06-04 | 07-13 | 116 a | 98 a |
| M2P4 | 03-19 | 03-29 | 04-21 | 05-17 | 05-26 | 06-04 | 07-13 | 116 a | 97 ab |
| M2P6 | 03-19 | 03-29 | 04-22 | 05-17 | 05-26 | 06-05 | 07-14 | 117 a | 97 ab |
| M3P4 | 03-19 | 03-29 | 04-21 | 05-17 | 05-26 | 06-04 | 07-13 | 116 a | 96 b |
| M3P8 | 03-19 | 03-29 | 04-22 | 05-16 | 05-26 | 06-05 | 07-14 | 117 a | 98 a |
| 处理 | 播种期 (月-日) | 出苗期 (月-日) | 开花期 (月-日) | 结荚期 (月-日) | 成熟期 (月-日) | 生育期/ d | 出苗率/ % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 03-19 | 04-03 | 05-09 | 06-11 | 07-20 | 123 c | 96 ab |
| M2P4 | 03-19 | 04-04 | 05-11 | 06-14 | 07-24 | 127 ab | 95 b |
| M2P6 | 03-19 | 04-03 | 05-11 | 06-13 | 07-23 | 126 b | 97 a |
| M3P4 | 03-19 | 04-04 | 05-12 | 06-15 | 07-25 | 128 a | 96 ab |
| M3P8 | 03-19 | 04-03 | 05-11 | 06-13 | 07-23 | 126 b | 96 ab |
Table 3 Effect of different intercropping row ratios on peanut growth stages
| 处理 | 播种期 (月-日) | 出苗期 (月-日) | 开花期 (月-日) | 结荚期 (月-日) | 成熟期 (月-日) | 生育期/ d | 出苗率/ % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 03-19 | 04-03 | 05-09 | 06-11 | 07-20 | 123 c | 96 ab |
| M2P4 | 03-19 | 04-04 | 05-11 | 06-14 | 07-24 | 127 ab | 95 b |
| M2P6 | 03-19 | 04-03 | 05-11 | 06-13 | 07-23 | 126 b | 97 a |
| M3P4 | 03-19 | 04-04 | 05-12 | 06-15 | 07-25 | 128 a | 96 ab |
| M3P8 | 03-19 | 04-03 | 05-11 | 06-13 | 07-23 | 126 b | 96 ab |
| 处理 | 株高/cm | 穗位高/cm | 茎粗/cm | 穗长/cm | 秃尖长/cm | 行粒数/粒 | 穗行数/行 | 百粒重/g |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM | 262.1 a | 111.5 a | 3.0 a | 21.0 a | 0.4 a | 40.7 a | 14.0 a | 41.8 a |
| M2P4 | 222.5 d | 96.2 bc | 2.5 b | 18.0 b | 0.9 a | 37.7 a | 13.3 a | 39.1 b |
| M2P6 | 221.0 d | 89.8 c | 2.6 ab | 19.2 ab | 0.5 a | 40.0 a | 16.0 a | 39.4 b |
| M3P4 | 233.0 c | 83.4 c | 2.6 ab | 18.9 ab | 0.8 a | 39.7 a | 15.3 a | 32.2 d |
| M3P8 | 248.9 b | 108.8 ab | 3.0 a | 19.5 ab | 1.2 a | 39.0 a | 15.3 a | 36.8 c |
Table 4 Effects of different intercropping row ratios on maize agronomic traits
| 处理 | 株高/cm | 穗位高/cm | 茎粗/cm | 穗长/cm | 秃尖长/cm | 行粒数/粒 | 穗行数/行 | 百粒重/g |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM | 262.1 a | 111.5 a | 3.0 a | 21.0 a | 0.4 a | 40.7 a | 14.0 a | 41.8 a |
| M2P4 | 222.5 d | 96.2 bc | 2.5 b | 18.0 b | 0.9 a | 37.7 a | 13.3 a | 39.1 b |
| M2P6 | 221.0 d | 89.8 c | 2.6 ab | 19.2 ab | 0.5 a | 40.0 a | 16.0 a | 39.4 b |
| M3P4 | 233.0 c | 83.4 c | 2.6 ab | 18.9 ab | 0.8 a | 39.7 a | 15.3 a | 32.2 d |
| M3P8 | 248.9 b | 108.8 ab | 3.0 a | 19.5 ab | 1.2 a | 39.0 a | 15.3 a | 36.8 c |
| 处理 | 主茎长/ cm | 侧枝长/ cm | 总分枝数/ 条 | 结果枝数/ 条 | 单株荚果数/ 个 | 百果重/ g | 百仁重/ g | 饱果率/ % | 出仁率/ % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 35.2 a | 39.0 a | 9.8 a | 9.2 a | 9.8 a | 181.0 a | 78.3 a | 90.48 a | 72.64 b |
| M2P4 | 34.4 a | 33.0 ab | 8.0 a | 6.6 c | 6.6 b | 134.1 d | 69.8 b | 87.80 b | 70.91 c |
| M2P6 | 33.8 a | 31.6 b | 8.2 a | 7.0 bc | 7.6 b | 145.8 c | 65.9 c | 80.00 c | 74.25 b |
| M3P4 | 32.2 a | 31.4 b | 9.2 a | 8.4 abc | 8.4 ab | 149.0 c | 62.5 d | 89.47 ab | 76.53 a |
| M3P8 | 34.1 a | 33.6 ab | 9.6 a | 8.6 ab | 8.6 ab | 170.8 b | 77.3 a | 90.14 a | 76.89 a |
Table 5 Effects of different intercropping row ratios on peanut agronomic traits
| 处理 | 主茎长/ cm | 侧枝长/ cm | 总分枝数/ 条 | 结果枝数/ 条 | 单株荚果数/ 个 | 百果重/ g | 百仁重/ g | 饱果率/ % | 出仁率/ % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 35.2 a | 39.0 a | 9.8 a | 9.2 a | 9.8 a | 181.0 a | 78.3 a | 90.48 a | 72.64 b |
| M2P4 | 34.4 a | 33.0 ab | 8.0 a | 6.6 c | 6.6 b | 134.1 d | 69.8 b | 87.80 b | 70.91 c |
| M2P6 | 33.8 a | 31.6 b | 8.2 a | 7.0 bc | 7.6 b | 145.8 c | 65.9 c | 80.00 c | 74.25 b |
| M3P4 | 32.2 a | 31.4 b | 9.2 a | 8.4 abc | 8.4 ab | 149.0 c | 62.5 d | 89.47 ab | 76.53 a |
| M3P8 | 34.1 a | 33.6 ab | 9.6 a | 8.6 ab | 8.6 ab | 170.8 b | 77.3 a | 90.14 a | 76.89 a |
| 处理 | 玉米产量/ (kg·hm-2) | 花生产量/ (kg·hm-2) | 群体产量/ (kg·hm-2) |
|---|---|---|---|
| SM | 9 132.0 a | — | 9 132.0 b |
| SP | — | 3 225.0 a | 3 225.0 f |
| M2P4 | 6 072.0 d | 1 273.5 d | 7 345.5 e |
| M2P6 | 8 784.0 b | 1 606.5 c | 10 390.5 a |
| M3P4 | 7 144.5 c | 1 527.0 c | 8 671.5 c |
| M3P8 | 6 091.5 d | 2 299.5 b | 8 391.0 d |
Table 6 Effect of different intercropping row ratios on the yield of maize and peanut intercropping
| 处理 | 玉米产量/ (kg·hm-2) | 花生产量/ (kg·hm-2) | 群体产量/ (kg·hm-2) |
|---|---|---|---|
| SM | 9 132.0 a | — | 9 132.0 b |
| SP | — | 3 225.0 a | 3 225.0 f |
| M2P4 | 6 072.0 d | 1 273.5 d | 7 345.5 e |
| M2P6 | 8 784.0 b | 1 606.5 c | 10 390.5 a |
| M3P4 | 7 144.5 c | 1 527.0 c | 8 671.5 c |
| M3P8 | 6 091.5 d | 2 299.5 b | 8 391.0 d |
| [1] | 王顺才, 姚才奎, 尹红升, 等. 云南省大豆间套作种植现状及发展对策[J]. 南方农业, 2022, 16(16): 23-25, 35. |
| [2] | 肖特, 崔阔澍, 黄文娟, 等. 玉米/大豆不同种植模式对土壤有机质和全氮空间分布的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(7): 1801-1810. |
| [3] | 郭笑恒. 不同种植模式对土壤理化性质及烤烟产质量的影响[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2021. |
| [4] | 武晶, 陈梦, 汪直华, 等. 带状间作不同带间距对玉米光能利用的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(23): 4648-4659. |
| [5] | 李双伟, 朱俊奇, EVERS J B, 等. 基于植物功能-结构模型的玉米-大豆条带间作光截获行间差异研究[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2022, 4(1): 97-109. |
| [6] | 赵婷婷, 伊淼, 王建国, 等. 不同玉米Ⅱ花生模式对花生产量及氮和钙养分吸收的影响[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2024, 46(3): 575-585. |
| [7] | 冯晨, 黄波, 冯良山, 等. 不同配置对辽西玉米||花生间作系统氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(1): 61-73. |
| [8] | 孟维伟, 高华鑫, 张正, 等. 不同玉米花生间作模式对系统产量及土地当量比的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2016, 48(12): 32-36. |
| [9] | 胡莎莎, 王飞, 李亚辉, 等. 玉米-花生间作行比与磷肥施用对玉米干物质积累及产量的影响[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2019, 47(8): 18-22. |
| [10] | 杨顺国. 玉米与花生不同间作模式研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2016, 44(35): 70-72. |
| [11] | 梁满, 沈一, 刘永惠, 等. 等带宽间作模式下不同玉米花生行比对花生光合特性和系统产量的影响[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2024, 42(1): 39-45. |
| [12] | 罗晓棉, 林文雄. 福建山区玉米与花生不同间作比例对产量的影响及其生态机制[J]. 福建农业学报, 2016, 31(4): 338-344. |
| [13] | WANG Q, SUN Z X, BAI W, et al. Light interception and use efficiency differ with maize plant density in maize-peanut intercropping[J]. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 2021, 8(3): 432-446. |
| [14] | 乔月彤, 蒋曦龙, 李晓靖, 等. 间作和施氮水平对玉米和花生农艺性状及花生结瘤的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2022, 54(6): 35-41. |
| [15] | 杨东. 旱作农田花生玉米间-轮作对作物生长发育及产量的影响研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2022. |
| [16] | 姬社林. 玉米花生适宜间作种植模式的研究[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2024(7): 73-75, 121. |
| [17] | 程亮, 贾振东, 黄慧, 等. 花生/玉米间作对花生生长发育的影响[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2019, 47(6): 30-32. |
| [18] | 李美, 孙智明, 李朦朦, 等. 不同比例玉米花生间作对花生生长及产量品质的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2013, 27(3): 391-397. |
| [19] | 张晓娜, 陈平, 庞婷, 等. 玉米/豆科间作种植模式对作物干物质积累、分配及产量的影响[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2017, 35(4): 484-490. |
| [20] | 朱冠雄, 高祺, 华方静, 等. 鲁西北地区大豆玉米间作不同行比配置对大豆生长、产量及间作系统的影响[J/OL]. 中国油料作物学报, 2025, 47(4):970-979. |
| [21] | 赵凤艳, 张勇勇, 冯晨, 等. 不同施氮量下玉米花生间作不同玉米行对土地当量比和产量贡献的研究[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2023(6): 129-137. |
| [1] | HU Tiejun, ZHOU Fei, JIN Shuquan, WANG Feng, CHEN Yutiao. Selection and evaluation of water-saving and drought-resistant rice adaptability in newly (reclaimed) cultivated land in mountainous and hilly areas [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(9): 2084-2089. |
| [2] | LI Chengwei, WEI Haimin, LIU Sheng, MENG Denghui, ZHOU Chenhui. Effects of chemical fertilizer replaced by biogas slurry on the agronomic traits and yield of rice [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(9): 2090-2095. |
| [3] | LI Tianqi, YUAN Qian, ZHAO Yongtao, ZHANG Zhongzhou, ZHEN Shicong, WANG Junsen, ZHANG Feng, SUN Xianye, LU Xiangdong, MEI Ning. Breeding innovation and high yield analysis of new wheat variety Luomai 76 with large grain and high yield [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(9): 2096-2101. |
| [4] | HU Ji, WENG Liqing, ZHENG Huazhang, YANG Yangyang, WANG Huanmiao, FAN Douwen, ZHOU Jieping. Key technologies for green, high-yield and efficient cultivation of overwintering cherry tomatoes in Ningbo Area [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(8): 1910-1914. |
| [5] | LI Chunlin, ZHANG Huiyu, LI Changjian, LI Yuling, XU Guoju, REN Li, LU Ruiqian, WANG Liangfa. Evaluation of lodging resistance and yield of two ethephon compound agents on maize varieties [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(8): 1962-1970. |
| [6] | HUANG Xin, LI Jinbing, JIANG Junfang, ZHENG Kaizhi, YANG Bo, ZHENG Huichao. Growth performance of forage grass intercropped in young tea plantations and its effects on soil properties [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(8): 1998-2001. |
| [7] | ZHU Pengfei, WU Mingming, ZHAI Rongrong, YE Jing, ZHU Guofu, YU Faming, ZHANG Xiaoming, LI Mengyang, YE Shenghai, WANG Jian. Analysis of major agronomic traits in late japonica rice varieties released in Zhejiang Province over the years [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(7): 1565-1569. |
| [8] | ZHANG Wenbin, REN Junkai, YE Shenghai, ZHANG Guoping. Variety characteristics of Zhejingyou 4 and exploration of its high-yield cultivation techniques [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(7): 1583-1586. |
| [9] | ZHAO Hanwei, CHENG Rundong, JI Hongting, WANG Shihong, WANG Yong, ZHAO Hejuan, ZENG Yannan. Effects of different fertilizer treatments on growth characteristics and yield of sweet potato [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(7): 1592-1597. |
| [10] | ZHOU Yao, ZHOU Enqiang, ZHU Yuxiang, YAO Mengnan, MIAO Yamei, LI Bo, ZHAO Na, WEI Libin, WANG Yongqiang, WANG Xuejun. Variety screening of spring soybean in soybean-maize strip intercropping system in Huainan ecological zone [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(7): 1598-1602. |
| [11] | YANG Yangyang, HU Ji, FAN Douwen, LI Nenghui, LI Zhongwei, WENG Liqing. Effect of different fertilizer treatments on the yield and quality of Zizania latifolia in saline alkali soil [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(7): 1632-1635. |
| [12] | WANG Xuefeng, MA Liya, HU Zefan, HUANG Yimian, LI Xiao, YE Tingyun, YE Xuezhu, CHEN De. Effects of optimizing fertilization on the yield and nutrient utilization efficiency of Yongyou 1540 [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(6): 1328-1332. |
| [13] | WANG Nuan, SHAO Ting, WU Meijuan, HUANG Hongming, ZHANG Yanan. Effects of different fertilization dose before and after topping on yield and quality of rapeseed [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(6): 1333-1337. |
| [14] | WU Zhaohui, WANG Mengmeng, DONG Ningyu, SONG Yandan, WANG Dian, LIU Qiaozhen, XU Wenzheng, HAN Huige, CHEN Guangqing. Study on harvesting methods of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) shoots for vegetable and green manure dual-use in winter fallow fields [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(6): 1338-1343. |
| [15] | JIN Ruo, GONG Jun, CHAI Weidong, KONG Wei, ZHOU Hanyue, ZHENG Jianbin. Effects of 6 soil treatments on continuous cropping obstacle of pepper in greenhouse [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(6): 1381-1384. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||