Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2025, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (8): 1962-1970.DOI: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20250359
Previous Articles Next Articles
LI Chunlin1(), ZHANG Huiyu1,*(
), LI Changjian1, LI Yuling2, XU Guoju1, REN Li2, LU Ruiqian1, WANG Liangfa1
Received:
2025-05-19
Online:
2025-08-11
Published:
2025-09-04
CLC Number:
LI Chunlin, ZHANG Huiyu, LI Changjian, LI Yuling, XU Guoju, REN Li, LU Ruiqian, WANG Liangfa. Evaluation of lodging resistance and yield of two ethephon compound agents on maize varieties[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(8): 1962-1970.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zjnykx.cn/EN/10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20250359
年份 | 品种 | 处理 | 穗长/cm | 穗粗/cm | 穗行数/行 | 行粒数/粒 | 千粒重/kg | 667 m2产量/kg |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2022 | 浚单20 | DTA-6·ETH | 16.39±1.19 a | 4.88±0.37 a | 15.40±0.72 a | 32.04±1.29 b | 323.92±33.46 a | 640.52±88.44 a |
6-BA·ETH | 16.47±1.56 a | 4.86±0.30 a | 15.40±0.41 a | 33.86±1.54 a | 319.88±18.35 b | 667.77±78.11 a | ||
清水CK | 16.37±1.16 a | 4.80±0.38 a | 15.60±0.37 a | 30.96±2.12 b | 315.52±31.71 c | 607.52±92.40 b | ||
先玉335 | DTA-6·ETH | 18.56±1.29 a | 4.57±0.37 a | 15.20±0.83 a | 29.08±0.90 b | 341.18±31.83 a | 670.57±43.21 a | |
6-BA·ETH | 18.69±0.73 a | 4.61±0.40 a | 15.40±0.54 a | 30.98±1.71 a | 339.37±31.77 a | 662.95±61.86 a | ||
清水CK | 18.15±1.87 a | 4.51±0.44 a | 15.40±0.82 a | 29.81±1.74 b | 337.80±31.32 a | 635.70±64.89 b | ||
豫单132 | DTA-6·ETH | 18.32±1.33 a | 4.60±0.29 a | 15.00±0.60 a | 33.22±1.90 a | 330.60±33.73 ab | 664.97±82.12 a | |
6-BA·ETH | 17.87±1.16 a | 4.47±0.20 a | 15.20±0.41 a | 32.50±1.54 ab | 332.47±35.20 a | 672.35±65.97 a | ||
清水CK | 17.31±1.75 a | 4.61±0.25 a | 15.00±0.62 a | 30.84±1.95 b | 319.50±34.01 b | 624.85±69.70 b | ||
联创808 | DTA-6·ETH | 18.68±0.97 a | 4.64±0.23 a | 15.20±0.41 a | 33.24±2.51 a | 341.93±33.06 a | 628.83±74.74 a | |
6-BA·ETH | 19.10±1.41 a | 4.46±0.26 a | 15.00±0.53 a | 33.52±2.29 a | 338.22±36.63 ab | 628.08±92.63 a | ||
清水CK | 17.99±1.65 a | 4.66±0.20 a | 14.80±0.78 a | 33.11±2.15 a | 322.27±36.14 b | 607.08±86.02 a | ||
鼎优163 | DTA-6·ETH | 15.32±1.27 a | 4.37±0.36 a | 15.60±0.65 a | 28.13±1.82 b | 316.45±25.10 a | 615.57±30.54 a | |
6-BA·ETH | 16.14±0.94 a | 4.43±0.30 a | 16.00±0.76 a | 30.20±1.41 a | 315.40±20.75 a | 621.07±39.02 a | ||
清水CK | 16.14±1.85 a | 4.33±0.24 a | 15.60±0.83 a | 29.73±1.13 ab | 312.02±24.55 a | 579.28±34.19 b | ||
郑单958 | DTA-6·ETH | 17.11±1.32 a | 4.76±0.21 a | 14.80±0.74 a | 31.25±1.74 a | 330.88±35.62 a | 628.83±74.74 a | |
6-BA·ETH | 16.74±1.35 a | 4.76±0.25 a | 14.80±0.66 a | 32.53±2.31 a | 325.85±32.78 a | 631.42±86.62 a | ||
清水CK | 17.04±1.29 a | 4.78±0.17 a | 14.80±0.63 a | 31.83±1.65 a | 325.62±35.43 a | 607.08±86.02 a | ||
2023 | 浚单20 | DTA-6·ETH | 16.34±1.43 a | 4.82±0.11 a | 15.40±0.48 a | 32.58±2.35 a | 310.15±21.52 a | 611.32±44.31 a |
6-BA·ETH | 16.04±1.28 a | 4.85±0.16 a | 15.60±0.44 a | 32.89±1.67 a | 308.13±17.07 a | 607.92±43.07 a | ||
清水CK | 16.34±1.32 a | 4.83±0.15 a | 15.60±0.84 a | 32.60±1.99 a | 307.30±26.85 a | 573.33±39.59 b | ||
先玉335 | DTA-6·ETH | 18.01±1.64 a | 4.45±0.25 a | 15.40±0.60 a | 31.15±2.25 b | 329.07±23.64 a | 622.53±53.83 ab | |
6-BA·ETH | 19.06±1.26 a | 4.62±0.29 a | 15.60±0.60 a | 33.20±1.43 a | 320.83±23.61 a | 632.45±86.81 a | ||
清水CK | 18.84±1.70 a | 4.50±0.39 a | 15.60±0.51 a | 31.28±2.04 b | 321.18±26.83 a | 578.93±82.18 b | ||
豫单132 | DTA-6·ETH | 18.10±1.12 a | 4.43±0.15 a | 14.60±0.51 a | 32.02±2.00 b | 316.73±25.72 a | 600.68±58.03 a | |
6-BA·ETH | 18.14±1.37 a | 4.52±0.15 a | 14.80±0.78 a | 33.02±2.16 a | 318.88±19.33 a | 586.98±47.91 a | ||
清水CK | 17.96±1.32 a | 4.62±0.13 a | 14.80±0.86 a | 32.54±2.19 a | 316.35±32.76 a | 562.40±56.12 b | ||
联创808 | DTA-6·ETH | 19.03±0.97 a | 4.54±0.12 a | 15.20±0.27 a | 33.60±1.61 a | 324.48±34.46 a | 646.92±77.05 a | |
6-BA·ETH | 19.47±1.31 a | 4.48±0.13 a | 14.60±0.29 a | 33.97±2.17 a | 316.67±29.20 ab | 633.22±74.78 ab | ||
清水CK | 19.28±1.08 a | 4.67±0.12 a | 14.80±0.44 a | 33.38±2.19 a | 317.37±34.13 ab | 611.30±80.32 b | ||
鼎优163 | DTA-6·ETH | 16.74±1.26 a | 4.47±0.24 a | 15.80±0.77 a | 30.91±2.11 a | 307.82±31.09 a | 597.25±71.61 a | |
6-BA·ETH | 16.23±1.14 a | 4.45±0.16 a | 16.00±0.61 a | 31.10±1.52 a | 301.50±34.43 a | 588.53±66.64 a | ||
清水CK | 16.15±1.67 a | 4.50±0.17 a | 15.80±0.77 a | 30.83±2.28 a | 298.47±34.94 a | 556.93±62.34 b | ||
郑单958 | DTA-6·ETH | 17.14±1.05 a | 4.83±0.14 a | 15.20±0.52 a | 32.89±2.09 a | 324.02±20.40 a | 557.32±61.50 a | |
6-BA·ETH | 17.22±1.05 a | 4.85±0.16 a | 15.20±0.82 a | 33.63±1.99 a | 316.47±23.40 b | 550.22±54.10 a | ||
清水CK | 17.20±0.78 a | 4.78±0.16 a | 15.00±0.41 a | 32.60±1.60 a | 312.15±22.32 b | 544.35±59.17 a | ||
变异来源 | 穗长 | 穗粗 | 穗行数 | 行粒数 | 千粒重 | 产量 | ||
年份(Y) | NS | NS | NS | ** | ** | ** | ||
品种(H) | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ||
处理(T) | NS | NS | NS | * | ** | ** | ||
Y×H | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | ||
Y×T | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | ||
H×T | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | ||
Y×H×T | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS |
Table 1 Effects of two ethephon compound agents on the yield traits of six maize varieties in different regions
年份 | 品种 | 处理 | 穗长/cm | 穗粗/cm | 穗行数/行 | 行粒数/粒 | 千粒重/kg | 667 m2产量/kg |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2022 | 浚单20 | DTA-6·ETH | 16.39±1.19 a | 4.88±0.37 a | 15.40±0.72 a | 32.04±1.29 b | 323.92±33.46 a | 640.52±88.44 a |
6-BA·ETH | 16.47±1.56 a | 4.86±0.30 a | 15.40±0.41 a | 33.86±1.54 a | 319.88±18.35 b | 667.77±78.11 a | ||
清水CK | 16.37±1.16 a | 4.80±0.38 a | 15.60±0.37 a | 30.96±2.12 b | 315.52±31.71 c | 607.52±92.40 b | ||
先玉335 | DTA-6·ETH | 18.56±1.29 a | 4.57±0.37 a | 15.20±0.83 a | 29.08±0.90 b | 341.18±31.83 a | 670.57±43.21 a | |
6-BA·ETH | 18.69±0.73 a | 4.61±0.40 a | 15.40±0.54 a | 30.98±1.71 a | 339.37±31.77 a | 662.95±61.86 a | ||
清水CK | 18.15±1.87 a | 4.51±0.44 a | 15.40±0.82 a | 29.81±1.74 b | 337.80±31.32 a | 635.70±64.89 b | ||
豫单132 | DTA-6·ETH | 18.32±1.33 a | 4.60±0.29 a | 15.00±0.60 a | 33.22±1.90 a | 330.60±33.73 ab | 664.97±82.12 a | |
6-BA·ETH | 17.87±1.16 a | 4.47±0.20 a | 15.20±0.41 a | 32.50±1.54 ab | 332.47±35.20 a | 672.35±65.97 a | ||
清水CK | 17.31±1.75 a | 4.61±0.25 a | 15.00±0.62 a | 30.84±1.95 b | 319.50±34.01 b | 624.85±69.70 b | ||
联创808 | DTA-6·ETH | 18.68±0.97 a | 4.64±0.23 a | 15.20±0.41 a | 33.24±2.51 a | 341.93±33.06 a | 628.83±74.74 a | |
6-BA·ETH | 19.10±1.41 a | 4.46±0.26 a | 15.00±0.53 a | 33.52±2.29 a | 338.22±36.63 ab | 628.08±92.63 a | ||
清水CK | 17.99±1.65 a | 4.66±0.20 a | 14.80±0.78 a | 33.11±2.15 a | 322.27±36.14 b | 607.08±86.02 a | ||
鼎优163 | DTA-6·ETH | 15.32±1.27 a | 4.37±0.36 a | 15.60±0.65 a | 28.13±1.82 b | 316.45±25.10 a | 615.57±30.54 a | |
6-BA·ETH | 16.14±0.94 a | 4.43±0.30 a | 16.00±0.76 a | 30.20±1.41 a | 315.40±20.75 a | 621.07±39.02 a | ||
清水CK | 16.14±1.85 a | 4.33±0.24 a | 15.60±0.83 a | 29.73±1.13 ab | 312.02±24.55 a | 579.28±34.19 b | ||
郑单958 | DTA-6·ETH | 17.11±1.32 a | 4.76±0.21 a | 14.80±0.74 a | 31.25±1.74 a | 330.88±35.62 a | 628.83±74.74 a | |
6-BA·ETH | 16.74±1.35 a | 4.76±0.25 a | 14.80±0.66 a | 32.53±2.31 a | 325.85±32.78 a | 631.42±86.62 a | ||
清水CK | 17.04±1.29 a | 4.78±0.17 a | 14.80±0.63 a | 31.83±1.65 a | 325.62±35.43 a | 607.08±86.02 a | ||
2023 | 浚单20 | DTA-6·ETH | 16.34±1.43 a | 4.82±0.11 a | 15.40±0.48 a | 32.58±2.35 a | 310.15±21.52 a | 611.32±44.31 a |
6-BA·ETH | 16.04±1.28 a | 4.85±0.16 a | 15.60±0.44 a | 32.89±1.67 a | 308.13±17.07 a | 607.92±43.07 a | ||
清水CK | 16.34±1.32 a | 4.83±0.15 a | 15.60±0.84 a | 32.60±1.99 a | 307.30±26.85 a | 573.33±39.59 b | ||
先玉335 | DTA-6·ETH | 18.01±1.64 a | 4.45±0.25 a | 15.40±0.60 a | 31.15±2.25 b | 329.07±23.64 a | 622.53±53.83 ab | |
6-BA·ETH | 19.06±1.26 a | 4.62±0.29 a | 15.60±0.60 a | 33.20±1.43 a | 320.83±23.61 a | 632.45±86.81 a | ||
清水CK | 18.84±1.70 a | 4.50±0.39 a | 15.60±0.51 a | 31.28±2.04 b | 321.18±26.83 a | 578.93±82.18 b | ||
豫单132 | DTA-6·ETH | 18.10±1.12 a | 4.43±0.15 a | 14.60±0.51 a | 32.02±2.00 b | 316.73±25.72 a | 600.68±58.03 a | |
6-BA·ETH | 18.14±1.37 a | 4.52±0.15 a | 14.80±0.78 a | 33.02±2.16 a | 318.88±19.33 a | 586.98±47.91 a | ||
清水CK | 17.96±1.32 a | 4.62±0.13 a | 14.80±0.86 a | 32.54±2.19 a | 316.35±32.76 a | 562.40±56.12 b | ||
联创808 | DTA-6·ETH | 19.03±0.97 a | 4.54±0.12 a | 15.20±0.27 a | 33.60±1.61 a | 324.48±34.46 a | 646.92±77.05 a | |
6-BA·ETH | 19.47±1.31 a | 4.48±0.13 a | 14.60±0.29 a | 33.97±2.17 a | 316.67±29.20 ab | 633.22±74.78 ab | ||
清水CK | 19.28±1.08 a | 4.67±0.12 a | 14.80±0.44 a | 33.38±2.19 a | 317.37±34.13 ab | 611.30±80.32 b | ||
鼎优163 | DTA-6·ETH | 16.74±1.26 a | 4.47±0.24 a | 15.80±0.77 a | 30.91±2.11 a | 307.82±31.09 a | 597.25±71.61 a | |
6-BA·ETH | 16.23±1.14 a | 4.45±0.16 a | 16.00±0.61 a | 31.10±1.52 a | 301.50±34.43 a | 588.53±66.64 a | ||
清水CK | 16.15±1.67 a | 4.50±0.17 a | 15.80±0.77 a | 30.83±2.28 a | 298.47±34.94 a | 556.93±62.34 b | ||
郑单958 | DTA-6·ETH | 17.14±1.05 a | 4.83±0.14 a | 15.20±0.52 a | 32.89±2.09 a | 324.02±20.40 a | 557.32±61.50 a | |
6-BA·ETH | 17.22±1.05 a | 4.85±0.16 a | 15.20±0.82 a | 33.63±1.99 a | 316.47±23.40 b | 550.22±54.10 a | ||
清水CK | 17.20±0.78 a | 4.78±0.16 a | 15.00±0.41 a | 32.60±1.60 a | 312.15±22.32 b | 544.35±59.17 a | ||
变异来源 | 穗长 | 穗粗 | 穗行数 | 行粒数 | 千粒重 | 产量 | ||
年份(Y) | NS | NS | NS | ** | ** | ** | ||
品种(H) | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ||
处理(T) | NS | NS | NS | * | ** | ** | ||
Y×H | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | ||
Y×T | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | ||
H×T | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | ||
Y×H×T | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS |
[1] | 董庆, 王芳, 王俊, 等. 中国化学调控技术对玉米产量效应的Meta分析[J]. 分子植物育种, 2021, 19(14): 4864-4872. |
[2] | 高兴祥, 姜兴印, 李美, 等. 植物生长调节剂的应用现状与建议[J]. 农药科学与管理, 2024, 45(9): 5-10. |
[3] | 徐月明, 辛海滨, 胡秋倩, 等. 化控药剂下大豆玉米带状复合种植农艺性状及产量分析[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2025, 66(1): 86-91. |
[4] | 许晅, 李小艳, 张占芳, 等. 乙烯利-甜菜碱复配剂对玉米生长发育的影响[J]. 玉米科学, 2014, 22(5): 71-75. |
[5] | 张子学, 朱仕燕, 李文阳, 等. 化控剂-乙烯利对玉米植株主要性状和产量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(3): 209-213. |
[6] | 刘文彬, 冯乃杰, 张盼盼, 等. 乙烯利和激动素对玉米茎秆抗倒伏和产量的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2017, 25(9): 1326-1334. |
[7] | 边大红, 张瑞栋, 段留生, 等. 局部化控夏玉米冠层结构、荧光特性及产量研究[J]. 华北农学报, 2011, 26(3): 139-145. |
[8] | 刘晓双, 顾万荣, 朴琳, 等. 噻苯隆-乙烯利复配对春玉米籽粒灌浆特性的影响及其激素调控机理[J]. 生态学杂志, 2017, 36(12): 3526-3534. |
[9] | 袁晓婷, 罗凯, 刘姗姗, 等. 化控对玉米带状间作大豆主茎分枝光合特性、物质积累及产量的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2024, 38(4): 776-784. |
[10] | 李姝彤, 边大红, 何璐, 等. 黄淮海夏玉米倒伏及化控抗倒技术研究进展[J]. 玉米科学, 2018, 26(3): 95-101. |
[11] | 李瑞杰, 唐会会, 王庆燕, 等. 5-氨基乙酰丙酸和乙烯利对东北春玉米源库碳平衡的调控效应[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(7): 1063-1075. |
[12] | 李建民, 董学会, 何钟佩, 等. 乙烯利-甲哌鎓复配剂对夏玉米生育及产量的影响[J]. 农药学学报, 2004, 6(4): 83-88. |
[13] | 刘晓双, 顾万荣, 张立国, 等. 噻苯隆-乙烯利复配剂对玉米子粒脱水效果及产量品质的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2018, 31(5): 934-940. |
[14] | 李建民, 董学会, 何钟佩, 等. 乙烯利-缩节安复配剂对夏玉米根系伤流液的影响[J]. 玉米科学, 2005, 13(3): 78-80, 83. |
[15] | 杨可攀, 顾万荣, 李丽杰, 等. DCPTA和ETH复配剂对玉米茎秆力学特性及籽粒产量的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2017, 31(4): 809-820. |
[16] | 郭丽英, 莫洁欣, 李冰虹, 等. 乙烯利在果蔬上的应用研究进展[J]. 南方农业, 2024, 18(17): 81-85. |
[17] | 张守林. 玉米栽培与植保技术精编[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2022: 169-171. |
[18] | 杨德光, 宫磊, 王迎博, 等. 外源6-苄氨基嘌呤(6-BA)对玉米幼苗抗冷性影响研究[J]. 玉米科学, 2023, 31(5): 74-82. |
[19] | GU Y, CHEN Y, YUE X, et al. LF-NMR/MRI determination of different 6-benzylaminopurine concentrations and their effects on soybean moisture[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2022, 13: 885804. |
[20] | 李凌雨, 周琦锐, 李洋, 等. 外源6-BA调控孕穗期低温后小麦幼穗发育的转录组分析[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(7): 1808-1817. |
[21] | 阎晓光, 杜艳伟, 李洪, 等. 不同浓度胺鲜酯处理吐丝期玉米自交系对种子活力的影响[J]. 种子, 2020, 39(11): 11-13. |
[22] | 李昊胜. DA-6处理对玉米自交系种子活力的影响[D]. 山东农业大学, 2019. |
[23] | 樊海潮, 顾万荣, 尉菊萍, 等. 植物生长调节剂增强玉米抗倒伏能力的机制[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2017, 33(2): 253-262. |
[24] | 张凤启, 张君, 马智艳, 等. 玉米茎秆穿刺强度及其相关性状QTL定位[J]. 玉米科学, 2024, 32(8): 17-22. |
[25] | 程云, 王枟刘, 杨静, 等. 种植密度对夏玉米基部节间性状与倒伏的影响[J]. 玉米科学, 2015, 23(5): 112-116. |
[26] | 周宝元, 葛均筑, 孙雪芳, 等. 黄淮海麦玉两熟区周年光温资源优化配置研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(10): 1843-1853. |
[27] | XUE J, GOU L, ZHAO Y S, et al. Effects of light intensity within the canopy on maize lodging[J]. Field Crops Research, 2016, 188: 133-141. |
[28] | 陈永强, 王雅菲, 谢惠玲, 等. 黄淮海地区夏玉米育种目标与策略[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(12): 2917-2924. |
[29] | 田再民, 黄智鸿, 赵海超, 等. 玉黄金化控对不同种植密度下玉米抗倒伏性和产量构成因素的影响[J]. 河北农业科学, 2019, 23(5): 51-55, 82. |
[30] | 樊海潮, 顾万荣, 杨德光, 等. 化控剂对东北春玉米茎秆理化特性及抗倒伏的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(6): 909-919. |
[31] | 马栋, 梁玉清, 郑荣, 等. 化控措施下氮肥用量对玉米干物质积累、抗倒伏能力及产量的影响[J]. 山西农业科学, 2022, 50(6): 830-835. |
[32] | 王利锋, 马娟, 王浩, 等. 不同生长调节剂处理对玉米农艺性状及产量的影响[J]. 分子植物育种, 2022, 20(10): 3465-3474. |
[33] | 吴思, 陶明德, 周迎鑫, 等. 化控对夏玉米产量与茎秆抗倒伏性状的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2023, 51(1): 91-98. |
[34] | 张能, 王春莲, 黄雅妮, 等. 化控剂对不同耐密基因型玉米品种农艺性状的影响[J]. 种子, 2019, 38(8): 141-144. |
[35] | 王更新, 李静, 孙华丽, 等. “玉黄金”对玉米品种穗部性状及产量的影响[J]. 河南科技学院学报(自然科学版), 2013, 41(5): 10-12. |
[36] | 程永钢, 段宏凯, 闫建宾, 等. 不同玉米品种在不同化控剂作用下产量的差异分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(9): 47-51. |
[37] | 于玮淇, 王芙臣, 杜伟嘉, 等. 种植密度与化学调控对春玉米茎秆性状及抗倒伏能力的影响[J]. 玉米科学, 2022, 30(5): 71-79. |
[38] | 王广明, 冯乃杰, 刘忠福, 等. 生长调节剂与密度对玉米光合性能及产量的影响[J]. 黑龙江八一农垦大学学报, 2017, 29(1): 1-5, 21. |
[39] | 李超, 王吉, 朱敏, 等. 增密条件下化控处理对春玉米光合特性、叶片衰老及产量的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2021, 50(3): 33-41. |
[1] | HU Ji, WENG Liqing, ZHENG Huazhang, YANG Yangyang, WANG Huanmiao, FAN Douwen, ZHOU Jieping. Key technologies for green, high-yield and efficient cultivation of overwintering cherry tomatoes in Ningbo Area [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(8): 1910-1914. |
[2] | LI Tonghua, LIU Xuecai, LIANG Aixin, ZHAN Shuai, WANG Zihao, QIN Yuejun. Effect of combined application of herbicides and biostimulants on maize [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(8): 1933-1937. |
[3] | HUANG Xin, LI Jinbing, JIANG Junfang, ZHENG Kaizhi, YANG Bo, ZHENG Huichao. Growth performance of forage grass intercropped in young tea plantations and its effects on soil properties [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(8): 1998-2001. |
[4] | ZHU Pengfei, WU Mingming, ZHAI Rongrong, YE Jing, ZHU Guofu, YU Faming, ZHANG Xiaoming, LI Mengyang, YE Shenghai, WANG Jian. Analysis of major agronomic traits in late japonica rice varieties released in Zhejiang Province over the years [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(7): 1565-1569. |
[5] | ZHANG Huaijie, SONG Yang. Screening of waxy fresh maize varieties in Yuyao City [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(7): 1578-1582. |
[6] | ZHANG Wenbin, REN Junkai, YE Shenghai, ZHANG Guoping. Variety characteristics of Zhejingyou 4 and exploration of its high-yield cultivation techniques [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(7): 1583-1586. |
[7] | ZHAO Hanwei, CHENG Rundong, JI Hongting, WANG Shihong, WANG Yong, ZHAO Hejuan, ZENG Yannan. Effects of different fertilizer treatments on growth characteristics and yield of sweet potato [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(7): 1592-1597. |
[8] | ZHOU Yao, ZHOU Enqiang, ZHU Yuxiang, YAO Mengnan, MIAO Yamei, LI Bo, ZHAO Na, WEI Libin, WANG Yongqiang, WANG Xuejun. Variety screening of spring soybean in soybean-maize strip intercropping system in Huainan ecological zone [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(7): 1598-1602. |
[9] | YANG Yangyang, HU Ji, FAN Douwen, LI Nenghui, LI Zhongwei, WENG Liqing. Effect of different fertilizer treatments on the yield and quality of Zizania latifolia in saline alkali soil [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(7): 1632-1635. |
[10] | WANG Xuefeng, MA Liya, HU Zefan, HUANG Yimian, LI Xiao, YE Tingyun, YE Xuezhu, CHEN De. Effects of optimizing fertilization on the yield and nutrient utilization efficiency of Yongyou 1540 [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(6): 1328-1332. |
[11] | WANG Nuan, SHAO Ting, WU Meijuan, HUANG Hongming, ZHANG Yanan. Effects of different fertilization dose before and after topping on yield and quality of rapeseed [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(6): 1333-1337. |
[12] | WU Zhaohui, WANG Mengmeng, DONG Ningyu, SONG Yandan, WANG Dian, LIU Qiaozhen, XU Wenzheng, HAN Huige, CHEN Guangqing. Study on harvesting methods of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) shoots for vegetable and green manure dual-use in winter fallow fields [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(6): 1338-1343. |
[13] | JIN Ruo, GONG Jun, CHAI Weidong, KONG Wei, ZHOU Hanyue, ZHENG Jianbin. Effects of 6 soil treatments on continuous cropping obstacle of pepper in greenhouse [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(6): 1381-1384. |
[14] | WANG Weiwei, WU Yongcheng, MEI Yi, YOU Chun, ZU Yanxia, SHEN Feng, LIU Zhe, ZHANG Lina, FENG Ruchao, ZHENG Jiaqiu. Impacts of organic fertilizer replacing chemical fertilizer on yield and soil properties of pepper [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(5): 1062-1065. |
[15] | TENG Liyao, FAN Chenggen, ZHANG Zuqing, LI Yun, LIU Yang, XIAO Peng, HUA Liqin, OUYANG Weiwei, XU Xiaojuan, CHEN Ronghua. Comprehensive agronomic traits and yield analysis of new peanut varieties [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 66(5): 1066-1071. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||